men and women is the obvious desire of so many gay people today wanting to serve their country in uniform at time when such service is extremely perilous. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "countdown with keith olbermann" starts right now. which of these stories will you be talking about tomorrow? how snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. the republicans again hint at filibustering tax cuts for the middle class. >> we think most americans think it's a bad idea to be raising taxes on anybody in the middle of' recession. even the rich? you might be wrong about that. the house democratic caucus meets to decide whether to force the republicans to reveal their toad diing to the rich by forcing republicans to vote against the middle class tax cuts. our special guests caucus chairman chris van holland and

the pollster who addressed the caucus stan greenberg. republican racism mae culpa. last year jim greer led the charge, calling the president's speech to school kids, quote, indoctrination. now an extraordinary admission. i found that many within the gop have racist views, and i apologize to the president for my opposition to his speech last year and my efforts to play indicate the extremists who dominate our party today. who writes economic policy for that party? fox's ad man. >> no new taxes, no new bureaucrats, cut spending, repeal obama care. would you be in favor of those? >> absolutely. not only would i be, we will be in favor. >> our guest congresswoman debbie wasserman schultz. delaware debacle. you might be in trouble if your former campaign manager comes

out against you. >> the palin endorsement i think is destructive and capricious. and what is wrong with this picture? everything. worst persons, her, the team, the league, reporters in locker rooms, and giving her network media passes when their last reporter showed up in a wedding dress and proposed to the quarterback at the super bowl. all the news and commentary now on "countdown." >> i don't see the problem. good evening from new york. with control of both house of congress hanging in the balance, democrats are hungry for something with which to motive their voters and get out and vote there is one issue on the table between now and november that holds the potential to fire up those democratic voters. but in our fifth story tonight, the democrats have not yet decided whether to make it an issue by bringing to it a vote in the house before election day. the issue. republicans are refusing to pass

obama's proposed tax cuts for the middle class unless democrats agree to pass republican tax cuts for incomes over a quarter million. tonight house democrats met to discuss whether bringing the battle to a vote benefits or hurts them at the ballot box. what they decide could very well determine whether the next congress is gavelled into order by speaker pelosi or by speaker boehner. at that meeting tonight was chris van holland, chairman of the democratic campaign committee standing by to brief us on that meeting. also at the meeting sam greenberg, who briefed democrats on what his polling says about the issue, also standing by to join us with what he said. the argument for voting on this similar to the political argument for today's vote in the senate on tax breaks for small businesses. senate democrats got two republicans to break their party's filibuster to give small businesses $12 billion in tax breaks and create a $30 billion fund that will leverage as much as $300 billion in small business lending, which means senate democrats can now argue that republicans tried to block

small business tax cuts in the middle of a recession. the argument against voting on the middle closing arguments tax cuts now? some democratic strategists reportedly are telling members of congress that even saying the word "taxes" helps republicans. that's it. but some republicans seem to understand the prospect of them blocking tax cuts for 98% of the country on behalf of the richest 2% a month before election day. they understand how that might not be a good thing. house republican leader john boehner sunday said of course he would vote for the obama middle class tax cuts if those were the only tax cuts he could still get. today his counterpart in the senate tried to claim falsely that most americans agree with him, but congress should extend tax cuts for everybody. he refused to say whether he like boehner would support the obama middle class tax cuts if those interest only ones he can get. >> i'm not going to answer any of the hypotheticals. that is my position as we go into this debate.

and if the other side thinks this is a great debate to have six weeks before the election to start looking at the politics of it, i assume they want to have the debate now before the election, even though this could be dealt with after the election. the reason they want to have it now, they think it's a good political debate for them. we're happy to have this debate. we think most americans think it's a bad idea to be raising taxes on anybody in the middle of a recession. >> most americans think it's a bad idea to be raising taxes on anybody in the middle of a recession. the plum line blog found a half dozen polls showing just the opposite. most americans support letting the bush tax cuts for the rich expire. pugh research 57%. national journal 56%. gallup 59%. cnn 58%. we asked senator mcconnell's office today to supply a single poll showing majority support for extending bush's tax cuts for the rich. no reply. grover norquist told the newspaper the hill that

republicans would fall into a political trap if they blocked obama's middle class tax cuts. newt gingrich telling voc radio, quote, why would you vote against a tax cut for millions of americans before an election just so the liberal democrats could then attack you? even before mr. boehner, some republicans showed signs they don't know how to proceed. if democrats make them choose between tax cuts for 98% of america or tax cuts for no one. it's kind of a conundrum. i'm not sure i can answer your question. congressman dave camp, quote, i'll probably vote for it. jeb hensarling of texas to politico yesterday, quote, out there in theoretical land might there be something that we vote on that is half a loaf? i suppose to. so. joining us back in actual land, sam greenberg, chairman who does polling for nbc news. thanks for joining us tonight,

sir. >> npr. that's okay. and l.a. times. >> we'll get the whole roster out there. give us your assessment of the caucus tonight and what you told them and how much they listened. >> well, this issue is obviously taken very, very seriously. i actually came over here. the caucus was supposed to be over, but it was still going on discussing this subject with a lot of support for addressing this. i don't want to talk about what members said in the caucus. that's for them to raise. i can talk about, you know, the polling that we did and what i said, which was essentially this is an issue in which about 38% of the country supports the republican position to extend these tax cuts, which is 10 points below the vote that republicans are getting right now. so this is an issue that drags them down. it's an issue that helps democrats. it is an issue i believe democrats want. it creates a framework of choice, and it defines the two parties.

it's a defining issue. democrats need that. both to build turnout, but to create a real choice, not a phony choice. this is a real issue there is real money involved and democrats have the advantage. >> 49 days to go. that time enough to brand these things the obama tax cuts? and did any democrats still think that they would lose if republicans are out there blocking quote/unquote the obama tax cuts? >> again, i can't speak for the members and the caucus, but there is -- clearly there is strong support for extending middle class tax cuts. i don't know what they're actually the other piece of it. but i think people, you know, understand just as the voters are clearly expressing that there is a difference between the parties reflected in this issue. sometimes, you know, you have spin. this is not spin. you know, this is real policy. if you don't do this, there is

$700 billion that you're not going to do for a deficit or investment for jobs. it's 700 billion you're going to take out and some place else. it's a real choice. and what our poll shows, not just that voters agree with the democrats. they shift their vote after hearing the arguments. we get a five-point shift in favor towards the democrats after the tax debate. people often think if it's a tax debate is not good for democrats. i always get that. i get it from other pollsters. i get it from elected officials. a tax debate is good for the democrats. people want the priorities the democrats bring to taxes. barack obama ran on it and won it. bill clinton won on raising taxes on the wealthy and won on it. ross perot wanted to do it as well. democrats should want a tax debate, particularly the kind of choices that are faced on this extension of the bush tax cut. >> does it help to actually brand wit the president's name? is there any indication of that?

>> you know, look, the president has an overall approval rating low to mid-40s. it varies by district. this is not an election about the president. it's fine to bring the president into it. obviously depends on the district. but it's not about the president. his tax cuts could come into play because we listen closely to mitch mcconnell. he is talking about repealing those. and opposing their extensions. so he is talking about raising taxes on the working poor, a lot of middle class people. so obama's name is certainly going to become prominent if that's what you're talking about doing. the bush tax cut, you know, represent trickle-down economics. that's what resonates in our poll. that's the strongest message. this says republicans believe in trickledown economics. you help the people at the top. that's going to help everybody else. people don't believe in that. they don't want to go back to that. >> democratic pollster stan greenberg, who also does polling for nbc news, npr and the l.a. times.

got it all that time. thanks for your time tonight. >> thank you. the message, not surprisingly given the polls we rattled off earlier. a tax debate is good for the democrats, that this issue cutting taxes for 98% of the country, an obama tax cut if you will while letting bush tax cuts for the rich expire is a political winner for the democrats with the majority of americans solidly behind it. we're going to go back to the hill now with congressman chris van holland, fresh from that very same meeting with the democratic caucus. and the congressman is hooked up. and we appreciate you rushing out to do this for us tonight. >> good to be with you keith. >> grover norquist as we quoted him before you arrive think the republicans could be falling into a democratic trap on this exact issue. have your members decided to spring that trap? >> well, as you know, keith, mr. boehner, the republican leader, made it clear from his remarks the other day that he recognizes that the american people will not stand for the idea that 98% of the american people's tax cuts are going to be held hostage to get in a big break

for the top 2%, a break which we know adds $700 billion to the deficit and will slow down long-term economic growth. so this is a very clear and defining issue. stan greenberg talked about that. and i think it does let people know throughout the country whose side are you on. and when you've got mitch mcconnell coming out and saying you know what? 98% of the american people, their tax relief has to wait until we do something for the top 2%, even though it puts it on our national credit card, and we all are going to be paying years and years for those tax cuts for the very wealthy, that's an issue that clearly defines the candidates and the parties. >> congressman, wouldn't calling these tax cuts what they actually are, the obama middle class tax cuts and then forcing republicans to go out there and vote against them in a month before the election, or even in the senate filibuster against them, would that not be manna from political heaven for the democrats, especially the way

the midterms are shaping up 49 days out? >> look, i do think it's worth a fight. i do think it's worth a vote. as to whether we start in the house or the senate, that's obviously something that we have to figure out. but there is no doubt about it. with mitch mcconnell saying he intends to block middle class tax relief, i think we should put them to the test. this whole argument they make about needing to protect small business series absolutely bogus. we now know that the nonpartisan joint tax committee has said only 2% of small businesses fall into that category where they would be affected at all. and what we're learning, and this is an important point, that those 2%, they include a lot of big hedge funds. they include some of the fortune 100 companies. they include bechtel corporation, a major construction firm that does a lot of contracts with the federal government. and the reason is that under the definitions of small businesses, it includes all s corporations. it's not your mom and pops

they're talking about. among those 2% are small businesses they're talking about, it's actually a lot of big lobbying firms in washington, hedge funds on wall street, and some bigger corporations. so we should put to rest this notion that they're out there protecting the small business guy. and we all know that after two bush tax cuts for the very wealthy, what happened? we actually lost 630,000 private sector jobs in the economy eight years later. so this notion that you somehow need it for job growth and economic growth has been proven, it's been proven false by the history of the last eight years. what we do know is that in the long-term doing this and adding $700 billion to the deficit will hurt job growth and slow down the economy. >> mr. greenberg just told us, and one would presume he told the caucus that the middle class tax fight versus the tax cuts for the rich is one that the democrats can win and can

explain and that the voting public is ready to hear that argument. you told plum line today that it's a good issue for your party. was there pushback to any degree at this caucus meeting today by democrats who don't buy into this argument still? >> look, keith, we are now having our members come back to washington from all over the country. and so we're going to have a discussion. but there is no doubt that the overwhelming view was that set forth by the president, which is that it's important to move forward on this issue. you know, the republicans set this ticking time bomb. when they passed these tax cuts way back, they said we're going to have them expire at the end of this year. what we're saying is let's make sure that the middle class gets a continuation of a tax cut, but we can't afford it for the top 2%. and the notion that it is somehow necessary for job growth is just proven wrong. and number 2, their whole approach is betrayed by the fact

that they were over in the senate filibustering the small business lending bill. finally we got voinovich, senator voinovich broke loose. but they're against that. they come out against the president's proposals for direct tax relief to small businesses which really would help the economy. so i think what we're seeing here is a very clear contrast as we go into this election. and, you know, the republican leader, john boehner knows that they're vulnerable on this issue, and he knows the american people are not going to stand for the idea of let's hold back tax relief for the overwhelming majority of americans so that we can help the folks at the top, including as i said, some of these fortune 100 companies. and that's why he said what he said the other day. because he realized at the end of the day, it's untenable to take that position. >> one last finding from mr. greenberg's data, which showed that running on this tax message would improve democratic polling from a seven-point deficit right now to a two-point deficit that

sounds like exactly the kind of tonic the democrats need both in terms of the enthusiasm gap and the get out the vote project. is anybody balking at that, or do those ideas sound good to the members of the caucus? >> i think that the main idea that sounds good, keith, is the notion that we need to provide tax relief for middle income america, that we need to move forward because it all expires at the end of the year, and we need to make sure that that relief is there for 98% of the american people. and that we address our long-term budget deficit there is an agreement with sam about what his numbers are showing. because when you talk to your friends and talk to neighbors around the country, they're telling our members you know what? number one we got to get our budget deficit under control. why should our children and grandchildren be paying the bill to provide this tax break for the folks at the very top, including the fortune 100 companies and the hedge funds and the lobbying firms when in fact we got to get our deficit under control to move our

economy forward? so i think that's why you're seeing this steady migration, including the statement from john boehner about the importance of moving forward on this. >> so with all that as preamble, are you going to take this to the floor? is this going to be a vote in the house and put the republicans on the spot before the election? >> well, i think there will be a vote in the congress. again, this issing? that is under discussion. i think there will be a vote in the congress whether the senate goes first or the house goes first. that's the kind of thing that needs to be resolved. and in the senate, you know, we know that mitch mcconnell, the senate republican leader has said he is going to stand in the way of middle class tax relief. he is going to stand in the way of 98% of the american people getting a tax break, even at this very tough time. so we'll have to see how it plays out. to your answer, i think it's important to move forward on a vote in the congress. the sequencing of that is something to be determined. >> congressman chris van hollen,

chairman of the democratic congressional campaign committee. thank you for joining us tonight. >> god to be with you, keith. >> there it is. i think there will be a vote in the congress, senate or house undecided. just when you begin to think you might be getting a little paranoid about the gop, something like this other thing happens. a year ago he was the chairman of the florida republican party. a year ago he was dismissing the president's speech to school kids as indoctrination and liberal lies. now the same man is admitting there is racism inside the gop, and he is sorry he enabled it. his story next. america's healthcare reforms change lives for the better. to find out how it can help you, visit us at americasfairhealthcare.org [ male announcer ] at ge capital, we're out there every day with clients like jetblue -- financing their fleet, sharing our expertise, and working with people who are changing the face of business in america. after 25 years in the aviation business, i kind of feel like if you're not having fun at what you do, then you've got the wrong job. my landing was better than yours.

no, it wasn't. yes, it was. was not. yes, it was. what do you think? take one of the big ones out? nah. iaiabetes. and i'm worried if i lose my job, i won't be able to afford insurance. not anymore. america's healthcare reforms change lives for the better. to see how it can help you, visit us at americasfairhealthcare.org

who would say many within the gop have racist views? who would talk about efforts to play indicate the extremists who dominate the republican party? the man who was a year ago chairman of the florida republican party, chris hayes on jim greer. so we're all paranoid about fox, when the republican whiz kid on the economy is accepting financial platforms proposed by fox hosts on the air? on her big day in delaware, her former campaign manager supports a robo call against her.

now we know why bp agreed so readily to the $20 billion fund. his plan to use it to outlast those who could go bankrupt before they get to sue bp, ahead. you never take an upgrade for granted. and you rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle. and go. you can even take a full-size or above. and still pay the mid-size price. i deserve this. [ male announcer ] you do, business pro. you do. go national. go like a pro. [ male announcer ] you do, business pro. you do. president obama: yeah, i took a trip to elkhart, indiana, today. elkhart's a place that has lost jobs faster than anywhere else in america, and the people who've lost them have no idea what to do i took a trip to elkhart, indiana today. elkhart is a place that has lost jobs faster than anywhere else in america. that tell people where to find food banks, even as the food banks don't have enough to meet the demand.

today president obama delivered his second annual back to school speech. you know, indoctrinating of the children of america as was charged one year ago. but this time in our fourth story, the right-wing hysterics have been silent, except for one. former florida gop chair jim greer was ousted from his chairmanship who has been indicted on six felony accounts because he allegedly funneled

money from the state's party revenues that man with that credibility caveat has issued this statement. in the years since i issued a prepared statement regarding president obama speaking to the nation's school children, have i learned a great deal about the party i so deeply loved and served. unfortunately i found many within the gop have racist views, and i apologize to the president and for my opposition to his speech last year and my efforts to play indicate the extremists who dominate our party today. my children and i look forward to the president's speech. here is part of mr. greer's five-paragraph diatribe from one year ago. as the father of four children i am absolutely appalled that tax dollars are being used to spread socialist ideology. the idea that school children will be forced to listen to his, increasing taxes on those who create jobs, et cetera. you got the idea. of course, the president didn't do anything like that. he talked about the importance of staying in school and working hard, and he told school kids that they could write their own

destiny. today's speech at the masterman school in philadelphia cued to the same things. while the speech will be shown in classrooms across the nation, this year there is no longer a plea for parents to pull their kids out of school. >> they've got to show up to school on time. you've got to pay attention in your class. you've got to do your homework. you've got to study for exams. you have got to stay out of trouble. you've got to instill a sense of excellence in everything that you do. that kind of discipline, that kind of drive, that kind of hard work is absolutely essential for success. >> one more thing, mr. greer amplified his reference to racism in a text message to the palm beach post. no names, but committee consists of people who fought me on outreach, and i had to discipline state members who promoted racist comments which i was also fought on too. let's bring in the washington editor of the nation, msnbc contributor chris hayes. good evening. >> good evening, keith. >> this is more startling about

what he said a year ago about indoctrination. because of his other troubles do we have to take it with a grain of salt? >> i think there is a certain consider the source here. he is in hot water. he is extremely angry and feels betrayed by the gop establishment. that is part of it. i think what it does reveal is how disingenuous and trumped up so many of these invented scandals are. i was going back through google today. i was trying to even recall them because they'll sort of appear and capture everyone's attention that. >> kick the ball and we all chase after it, and i'm guilty of it as well, and then they're gone there was a week where all we talked about zars, was the president pointing too many czars. it was totally invented. no one talks about it anymore. it went meant to leverage any policy comment, it was to kick up dust. and obviously the complaints about the speech last year are the same way. >> and by the way, in terms of gop figures who criticize and

then are thrown under the bus, i was thinking of paul o'neill and scott mcclellan. >> yeah. >> mr. greer's statement and this text message, they're asserting racism within the party. he did not make a direct cause and effect link between that and the indoctrination hysteria of last year. but is the implication as clear as it seems? >> i thought the most interesting part of that message for him was saying apiecing the extremists within my own party. the fact of the matter is, you know, it's very difficult to get a quantitative sense of, you know, how hard-core or large that kind of extremist fringe is. but the fact is it's dominant right now. it's the center of gravity. i think what you see is every politician in the gop feels right now that those are the people they need to speak to, particularly in primary season, but just generally. you have someone like rick perry talking about succession or people spouting off about socialist indoctrination. you have newt gingrich saying the same things. all this is done because the audience presumably is the most

extremist and zealous and sort of idealogically rigid reactionary element of the coalition. >> you just need excuse. you're not heari ining tim pawl? >> pawlenty is a perfect example. did pawlenty really think this was socialist indoctrination? did he think it was an illegitimate use of taxpayer money? outraged theater and who of it the people have really kind of gotten delusional. they have gotten wrapped up in the fever of the tea party generally. but i think most of it is pretty cynical and disingenuous. particularly people angling their way toward an ultimate primary nomination 2012 in the presidency, that's where they're casting everything that they're saying right now. >> and we now know after hearing george voinovich being the

whistle-blower last week complaining about the blocking of good legislation on small businesses that it takes either time or retirement for republicans to come clean? >> i thought it was interesting today they got two votes to get the small business tax cuts bill through. and they were both from republicans that aren't running from reelection. i think that's very revealing. and that's basically been either you're in this little beachhead of moderate republicans in the northeast, or you're retiring. those are the only ways to vote with the democrats or with the president, no matter what the actual substantive agenda. i think from the beginning, you know, we'll see wisely or not. certainly terribly for the country. but wisely politically. the idea is you just say no. >> nobody retires from the gop family msnbc contributor chris hayes of the nation. thank you, chris. good to talk to you. >> thanks, keith. there was another republican whistle-blower today, this one telling the truth about the

woman whose campaign she once managed. christine o'donnell. or known around here christine "when i think about you i don't touch myself" o'donnell. we're part of nature, and as we destroy nature, we destroy ourselves. it's a selfish thing to want to protect nature. i never intended to be a businessman. we made the world's best climbing equipment out of here. we realized that putting in and taking out of all these pitons was causing damage to the rock. so, i made these little soft aluminum chalks that you just put in with your fingers. and i'm a dam buster.

we've been working for years to take this dam out. the reservoir behind it is only 4 feet deep-- the water gets real warm, kills a lot of the life in the river. when you take out a dam, that's a real victory. i mean, a concrete victory so to speak! when i get an idea to do something, i like to take the first step. if that feels good, i take another step. to do good, you actually have to do something. no matter what you want to do, members project from american express can help you take the first step. vote, volunteer or donate at membersproject.com.

everyone knows a fee is a tax. you raised some taxes during that period, particularly the property tax as well as a lot of fee increases. as you know, there's a big difference between fees and taxes. but...they're the same. it's a tax. it's a tax. it's a tax. it's a tax. there's a big difference between fees and taxes. fees and taxes are one in the same. if it comes out of my pocket, it's a tax. now he says it isn't true. we didn't raise taxes. what? still doing the same thing, paying out more money. typical politician. definitely.

a fox commentator literally writing republican economic policy for the gop's go-to guy on the economy in the house on the air. that's next versus the sanity break and the tweet of the day from lincoln park. middle class girl get tax cut, eats more meat. rich girl gets tax cut, makes dress with meat.

thank you for writing lady gaga's next song for her. let's play "odd ball." >> we begin in singapore. talk about going out in style. welcome to the cutting edge of urn storage. for the bargain price of $22,000, your ashes can collect dust in history and luxury. with such nice surroundings, the regular monks singing won't do. everything is run by an iphone. there is an app for that. a death app. i knew he was planning that. the system utilize as $1.5 million light and sound system. of course, it would not be complete without a laser light show. or as the old saying goes, ashes to ashes, lasers are awesome. and the internet, you see a man getting his car washed. looks like he missed a spot on the windshield. better get out and get that. and boom goes the dynamite. the man escaped unharmed.

not a little soapy. just not sure if he thought the machine was done or he just wanted suicide doors. either way, its worst thing to happen to a car wash since lenny dykstra. given the fact that it's been on the air three years and it has such poor ratings, it has yet to officially reveal any of them. you wouldn't think the fox business channel had a lot of sway, except it is now writing fiscal policy for the gop live on the air. representative debbie wasserman schultz next.

the good news is the republicans actually have plans for the economy. the bad news is they copied them down as they were dictated by a guy on fox. our third story is roger ailes once sent george bush a list of instructions for his presidency. now his minions have given the chief gop guy on the economy his orders live on tv. democratic congresswoman debbie wasserman schultz joins me in a moment. the self-proclaimed youngish gun of the gop. meanwhile, paul ryan in

wisconsin making an appearance on america's nightly scoreboard, believed to be 21 million viewers nationwide. host david asman, after he brushed off minority leader boehner's asorgs. he has a proposal for the congressman. a right wing agenda called the scoreboard contract surprisingly substituting newt gingrich's contract on america. >> you have a clear choice. one ideology or another. >> we have a choice of two futures. let's get on with making that choice. >> scoreboard has our own list, our own contract if you will. the scoreboard contract is no new taxes, no new bureaucrats. cut spending. repeal obama care. would you be in favor of those? >> absolutely. not only would i be in favor of these things, we will be in favor of those things. >> you tell them, asman. meanwhile, fox prime time viewers will be treated to enlightenment. running an ad newscorp gave to the governors association.

the donation received one mention on the self-declared news network. the ad had to be tweaked multiple times before fox deemed it repeatable. between the ad for goldline and the other ad for goldline. joining me now as promised is vice chair representing the florida 20th, congresswoman debbie wasserman schultz. congresswoman, thanks again for your time tonight. >> thank you, keith. >> the last point first. if i am a fox viewer, my reaction to the media matters ad would be so what is wrong with giving money to oppose democratic candidates. does the ad change anything? >> i guess what it changes, i don't know if the ad changes anything, but what seems to have changed is at least fox now seems to be being transparent about being an arm of the republican party. i mean someone who is an occasional guest on that network, i have often struggled to find the neutrality in the interviewers' questions. and at least now they're letting it all hang out there. >> they're fair and balanced.

they have conservatives and republicans. >> and tea party. >> one of your house colleagues, mr. ryne was signing policy pledges put forward by a supposed news organization. is this new or have republicans actively been taking policy from fox and congressman ryne happened to do it in front of tv cameras? >> all kidding aside, it's actually really disturbing. any news network, even one with a particular slant should at least represent themselves as being neutral. and any politician, any candidate, anyone being interviewed on a network should feel like they have a fair shake. republicans and democrats. and on fox, when that host made it clear that they have an agenda, that they're trying to get members of congress to sign on to publicly on the air, they're making contributions to republican organizations, it's unbelievably outrageous that they continue to represent themselves as a neutral television network, news

organization. but at the same time, they're transparently advocating for support and success of republican candidates for office. >> let me revert to the lead story tonight. you may have heard congressman van hollen before talking about whether or not to force the republicans to vote against the middle class tax cuts while trying to preserve their tax cuts for the rich. his answer to us was he expect there's will be a vote in congress. he is not sure if it will go to the house first or the senate would take the lead on this. i guess the question is a two-partner which is a, why on earth would democrats not want to see that vote happen. and b, are you going to call the middle class tax cuts obama tax cuts to differentiate them? >> well, we do want to see them happen. and we want to see them happen sooner rather than later. we want to make sure that of any of the bush tax cuts that are made permanent, the ones that focus on the middle class and working families are the ones we want to make sure are reenacted. the ones that focus on the

wealthiest 2% of americans that would add $700 billion to the deficit should be allowed to expire because they don't do anything to turn the economy around. most wealthy americans simply invest in the stock market, sit on their money, and working families put that money back out into the economy. >> dnc vice chair congresswoman debbie wasserman schultz, as always, thanks for your time. >> thank you, keith. disorder in delaware as an ex-campaign manager campaigns against her and accuses her of not paying her staff and living off her campaign contributions. an exclusive flashback before ms. o'donnell entered the domain of politics, she talked about being master of your domain. unrated under rachel's guests tonight is me. you've all heard the story. now who is at fault? the answer is everybody! ♪ [ male announcer ] every business day, bank of america lends billions of dolls,

toaldividutu institions, schools, organizations and businesses. ♪ working to set opportunity in motion. bank of america. oh no, no! pi just ked ahered ago! a ve me wik, you? with t different gels for softness and support... ...are outrageously comfortable. .. ndn seco,houghtin i thali'll w ou (ann er) are u gellin'? dr. scholl

♪ j♪ dreams of landns meet sea, deliciously ♪ ♪ friskies surfin' and turfin' favorites. ♪ ♪ feed the senses. but these days you need more than the book. you need website development, 1-on-1 marketing advice, search-engine marketing, and direct mail. yellowbook's got all of that. yellowbook360's got a whole spectrum of tools. tools that are going to spark some real connections. visit yellowbook360.com and go beyond yellow. now for the compensation fund of 20 billion. you knew there was a catch. they revealed that catch

tonight. and the tea partier attacked by dick crystal and now her campaign manager from two years ago and how she is doing. a call shortly on "countdown." financing their fleet, sharing our expertise, and working with people who are changing the face of business in america. after 25 years in the aviation business, i kind of feel like if you're not having fun at what you do, then you've got the wrong job. my landing was better than yours. no, it wasn't. yes, it was. was not. yes, it was. what do you think? take one of the big ones out? nah. [ dog barking ] [ sniffing ] [ male announcer ] missing something? like 2 pairs of glasses for $99.99 at sears optical, with bifocal lenses for just $25 more per pair. hurry in to sears optical today and don't miss a thing. no pain medicine is proven to last longer than advil. not tylenol. not aleve. nothing lasts longer than advil. pain relief that lasts.

one more reason to make advil your #1 choice. you want to replant a forest? lasts. maybe you want to rebuild homes for those in need? or, maybe you want to help improve our schools? whatever you want to do, members project from american express can help you take the first step. vote, volunteer or donate for the causes you believe in at membersproject.com. take charge of making a difference. nothing like having your former campaign manager come out against you on election day. christine o'donnell and the tea party. that's next. first, get out your pitchforks. inez sainz, sports reporter at the mexican tv network azteca who covered the sports practice

saturday. she shares with everybody in the world. don't cross me. i'm in a bad mood. the jets coaches ordered that throwing and running plays be directed towards her. the players acted inappropriately towards her in their locker room. national coverage has given her more coverage to show more pictures of her. various media women's groups has thrown their weight behind her even as she undermines every woman sports reporter that knows the game. the bar professionally at a sporting event is only about an eighth of an inch off the ground. she has done this before at a super bowl media day. so the team's media office should have known what was likely to happen. even if they hadn't, it was tv azteca which sent another reporter to the 2008 super bowl, a different inez who showed up in a wedding dress and proposed to patriots quarterback tom brady and jumped in his arms. why do they keep giving credentials? you have to keep team locker rooms and media day open for stunt reporting?

you can't say fine, here are the credentials. no wedding dresses or provocative outfits. and that goes for men too. and ultimately, what the hell are reporters doing in locker rooms tonight. bill has an update from his book pinheads and patriots which is not to be confused with my book pitchforks and torches. he takes shot at two major conservative figures above him in the food chain, reading, my colleague glenn beck thinks that the 44th president of the united states -- that might god help us resemble france. rush limbaugh believe pretty much the same thing, that the president is a force for pernicious change. i am not so sure this scorched earth strategy aimed a at the president is good for the country. hold on there, sparky. you're going to insult lonesome roads beck and limbaugh, i'm going to have to ask you to step outside. the newest winner, dudley,

transocean and halliburton now claim the been fits in the 400 or so lawsuits filed thus far can't sue them yet. bp's court filings say the fishermen, seafood processors, hotel owner, restaurateur, oyster farmers and the like must first apply to relief from the official bp compensation fund, that they must play that game of bureaucratic red tape before they can begin to sue. even the lawyers are saying they should wait until next march before which test cases should proceed to trial and which should not. that's moving too fast for bp. and now we know why bp agreed to the $20 billion fund. because it buys them time for the public to forget, for the remaining oil to dissipate, for them to potentially lose internal memos and e-mails and text messages and other evidence of their culpability, and especially time for the victims to run out of money with which to pay their lawyers. bob dudley of bp, never did figure out what the p really stands for. but the b is clearly for

bastards, today's worst person in the world. s♪ it' lagal mtter bba got men,the rulet's a l bmattery ♪ l whenise's th ard,ngaduatievan be r. harde t buheu can an jose e ths tudentco your unity ma ro it thbyh ngvisiti.ooostup . buheu can an jose e ths tudentco your unity wait r a k.l shoc em i rinber bet aite hospin think i "avould hordone mo te ke carf. mysel ulou sho ha ti's why siexerci w.re no g eatinr.althie aand it o trus heart to nnmale a wncer ] n diet cid exerot are n a piing liher may . it lip is aho c-lsterolmeering

isthat roda appd ucto redskthe ri a heartd ack an at in p vewho haiseart d f riskortors fiseart d orlipiteds back y over s yearrc resea li ntor isve for e in peuding le th wiroiver p d ano men whine nurs na preg, o ecmay bgne pre su needoople bl tests f check p liver y tellorr doctarf you i takr otheondicati i orav you hus any m e pain es weakn mathis igbe a sarof a r iout seref side n deaerll nev orgeta wht he wen tdon't he your lthntr gra. a[ male ]ouncer hhave ahert to t with tour docyoabout ouand abr.lipito 'rweouwith yu'hen yo orving feaour dr. n [ womaouwhen ybaant a veat trayo with h wit yu whenad're re nr the.t move an male ] uncer w thatel w a fargohod wacia av hogcome t her,w it's inu?for yo enprecedngd stre, th itstabil lof the dingco baunity e in th w and00h 12,0 tmsa sa thoubs of ,nches 'r weouwith y wn more s d anhaaces tefever be. h wit yu whenth want mostm frok.ur ban

an male ] uncer rglls fa et togl r we'l

as poll closing times in new york, rhode island and wisconsin approach, those in five other voting venues that have already closed, particularly in delaware where in our number one story, approximately 40,000 primary voters have already determined if there will be new party adventures for old christine o'donnell. she has been increasing her lead as the vote totals have been coming in. we'll update you throughout the night. former tv pundit, who has not held a steady job in years voting today in wilmington. her moderate opponent mike castle the state's lone representative in the house of representatives also voting in wilmington. delaware's republican party today working the phones robo calling voters with testimonial from a woman who said she was

the 2008 campaign manager for o'donnell's failed bid to unseat joe biden. kristin murray calling christine o'donnell a complete fraud. >> this is her third senate race in five years. as o'donnell's manager, i found out she was living on campaign donations, using them for rent and personal expenses while leaving her workers unpaid and piling up thousands in debt. she wasn't concerned about conservative causes. o'donnell just wanted to make a buck. >> after voting today, miss o'donnell was upbeat and vowed to repair her relationship with the republican party. >> come tomorrow, should things go the way they appear, i would like to extend an olive branch to the republican party because there is a lot of work to do. we have a winning message. >> today in washington, john cornyn, head of the national republican snorial committee called o'donnell's chances of beating a democrat come november a quote, serious issue. he called delaware's seat a linchpin to taking back the senate and asked if they would petroleum their money out in the

event of an o'donnell victory. said he would have to have a powwow about it. the split on christine o'donnell. sarah palin endorsed the tea party favorite after meeting her at glenn beck's magic goose rally. this morning on radio, beck, who rarely endorses candidates said of the delaware race, quote, i would vote for what's her face. thank you. on the castle side, charles complaining last night that ms. palin's endorsement was capricious, destructive and irresponsible. bill kristol invoked lloyd benson and dan quayle, quoting kristol, i know sarah palin. i respect sarah palin. and with all due respect, christine o'donnell is no sarah palin. just to clarify, he meant that as an insult. joining me now haired fineman, political columnist and msnbc political analyst. we've got to keep you cleared. >> thank you. >> mitch mcconnell on this network today said he would support either candidate that

comes out of delaware. will republicans spend money in delaware if christine o'donnell is that delegate? >> yes, they'll have to, keith. i was there this afternoon. i was at a polling place in an elementary school in newark, delaware. and trying to talk to voters as they came out of the polls. and i found it pretty evenly split in what was a pretty establishment-oriented neighborhood. pretty evenly politic between castle and o'donnell, which i think is now reflected in the results that you see. she came out of nowhere. and i think that the republicans knowing the numbers in the senate, wanting that seat will grit their teeth and support her down the line. >> the endorsement of o'donnell by palin, was she going kind of rogue on the weekly standard people who essentially put her on the map in the first place? >> to some extent yes. but, you know, there the case of bill kristol, be careful what you wish for, what you help create. sarah palin's a force out there. jim demint is a force out there.

he also endorsed o'donnell, the senator from south carolina. you know, this is energy at the republican grassroots that republicans can't contain because it's more conservative than it is republican. >> the assumption going into this, there was no way this woman, fairly poorly funded and with a dubious track record to say the least would give congressman castle much problem whatsoever. the assumption of victory is that she couldn't possibly give the democratic nominee mr. koontz a problem. is that as bad an assumption as the first one? >> judging by my own track record, i said a few weeks ago she was likely to be one step too far, too much badge, too many concerns over her personal finances and so forth, which are all out there and which mike castle, mr. nice guys i guy in delaware politics used as ammunition in a very, very hard-hitting attack.

but it could be if these results hold up tonight, keith, that mike castle went out of character, and in so doing undermined his own chances of staving this off. because a lot of voters i talked to, several of them, especially women, and women are a big part of the equation here for christine o'donnell, sarah palin for that matter. the women said they were upset at mike castle attacking her. so in the end, he faced a hobson's choice and it might have backfired on him. >> what was the choice in new hampshire? what has gone on in new hampshire? >> well, in new hampshire you have a fascinating situation where sarah palin endorsed the woman candidate, kelly iat, but the manchester union leader and jim demint went with the local guy from manchester. i'm going to have to read his name. ovid la montagne. the union leader has tremendous clout in new hampshire. and they went with la montagne. and they backed him all the way. and they and demint are probably going to take her down