ex-es about get money out and that will do it for us today. i'm dylan ratigan. i'll do the same thing. up next, "hardball" right here on msnbc with chris matthews. send out the clowns. let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm chris matthews in washington. leading off tonight, clown show. that's what the republican field is amounting to. michele bachmann starts talking about the sign of the beast during a presidential debate. rick perry says the american revolution happened in the 16th century, and newt gingrich says chris dodd and barney frank should be imprisoned for writing legislation he disagrees with. no wonder mitt romney never, quote, loses a debate. how could he in this crowd? barney frank is here to deal with newt's bomb-throwing at the top of the show.

also, mitt romney turns out to be the movie you see when the movie you wanted to see is sold out. as roberta flack and donny hathaway sang "where is the love." polls show romney treading water while republicans keep picking a new flavor of the month. plus, joe biden said today it won't happen. hillary clinton said today it won't happen, and i have no evidence that it will, so why do some people keep stirring the pot saying a desperate president obama will dump biden and put hillary on the ticket? and what do you make of that alleged plot to assassinate the saudi arabian ambassador here in washington? was it a rogue operation or a plant at the top in iran? finally, let me finish with the sorry display we saw last night. as miss peggy lee would say, is that all there is? we start with the clown show that the republican field has become, as we saw last night in that debate. u.s. congressman barney frank is a democrat of massachusetts, david corn, of course, is an msnbc political analyst and washington bureau chief for "mother jones" magazine. congressman frank, a lot of

respect for you, as you know. i want you to listen, if you didn't catch it last night, here was newt gingrich last night talking about you and former senator chris dodd saying you should both be in prison. let's watch. >> if they want to really change things, the first person to fire is bernanke who is a disaster as chairman of the federal reserve. the second person to fire is geithner. if you want to put people in jail, i want to second what michele said, start with barney frank and chris dodd and let's look at the politicians who created the environment. the politicians who profited from the environment, and the politicians who put this country in trouble. >> clearly you're not saying they should go to jail. >> well in chris dodd's case go back and look at the countryside deal and barney frank look at the lobbyists he was close to at freddie mac. >> well, that was a portrait of male violence. congressman frank, what do you make of in? is this libel? i don't know what to make of it. >> first of all, you have to understand, when you think you're the intellectual leader of the free world and you find

yourself struggling to pass michele bachmann in a poll in iowa, it is unsettling, i understand, that the poor man isn't getting his due, but what was particularly extraordinary was he was talking about a period when he was in charge, not me. you know, the run up to this crisis, the crisis began to bubble over in 2007 and 2008. the republicans controlled the congress from 1995 through 2006. newt was himself speaker for four years, did nothing about the problems he accuses me and chris of causing and then accuses tom delay. i'm regretful, chris. apparently i had some secret influence over the republican leadership i didn't know about, because if i had i would have told them not to impeach president clinton. i would have told them not to go to war in iraq. i would have told them a lot of things that i would have done. the second thing, what he then is objecting to, the bill that we passed. they don't like independent consumer agency and the work

that elizabeth warren did. they don't want derivatives regulated. they want to go back to a situation where aig was able to get in all this trouble. they don't want a fiduciary responsibility of people who advise investors. as i said, first of all, he's talking about the period when his party was in control. in 2007 when we took over, we began to make el legal these subprime loans, et cetera, and as i said, poor newt is just beside himself. he thought he was a great gift to the country, and he finds himself being taken back to the return window, not at tiffany you're i guess, and he can't deal with it. >> let me such that behind the maleviolent comment of newt gingrich of you and senator dodd was a grim effort to try to raise a few bucks in this campaign. as you must know, congressman frank, as everybody in business knows it, you did something to regulate those people, ais this

the way to pass the tin cup around and get money for what's already a cash-strapped campaign, not only a ludicrous one but a poor one? >> i suppose there are a great de number of people who made money and if you read the journals and whatever, there are people complaining that because of what we did they can't do as much. by the way what, we did was to restrict some of the activity that added nothing to the real economy, trading paper back and forth. i mean, these people had -- they were engaged in economic transactions that had as much relationship to the real economy as fantasy football has to sunday afternoon, except they were making money off of it. and people were very angry at us because they are not making the trading profits they used to make, and, yes, i'm sure newt does make some money off of it. >> what do you make of the republican party? you grew up in massachusetts and new jersey way before that. you know there used to be a clifford case republican party, a party of governor sargent and reasonable people. what happened to that? last night, i want you to start

and look at this. here's rick perry who actually is a governor of one of the states, maybe a secessionist governor but a governor, and here he is talking about the revolutionary war. of course, massachusetts had much to do with it. here he is talking about when it was fought, not about when the earth was founded 5,000 years ago, according to these people, but when we fought our revolution, that part. let's listen. >> our founding fathers never meant for washington, d.c. to be the fountain of all wisdom. as a matter of fact, they were very much afraid of that. it was actually the reason that we fought the revolution in the 16th century was to -- to get away from that type of onerous crown, if you will. >> how do you describe this knucklehead history? i mean, this guy is the guy that said texas has the right to secede from the union. i think we fought a war over that. now he's placed, well, they always have problems with the history of the universe, he had problems with that. here he is saying our country

was founded back in the 1500s. >> i'll be honest, i think rick perry is jealous of me and here's why. he signed a book that someone wrote and said he could never live in massachusetts because they vote for ted kennedy, a great senator, john kerry and me, even after they know what we stand for. he was appalled that people would vote for us even after they know what we stand for. the reason i think he's jealous is as people in the republican party have found out what he stands for, they are not voting for him, so he's very jealous that someone can tell people what he thinks and not have to repudiate it or go back on it. the floundering around, yeah, it's discouraging, but to go back to your main point. i was very bipartisan when i was in the legislature. there were some differences, but we could work together, i think. you have a group of people now. the republican party today is in the grips of the most rigid ideological splinter we've seen, and the problem is that they don't represent the whole country. they represent the people who vote in republican primaries and

that's driven all of them further right, so mitt romney, for example, is in a mode of repudiating position after position. i notice in the debate last night they quoted his having supported the -- the bush administration's efforts to deal with the financial crisis in 2008. he's now repudiating that. he of course has repudiated the health care. there has never been a time in american history when so rigidly ideologically extremist a group has controlled one of the major parties. >> and he was the sober one last night. let's look at rick santorum. i want david to get in here. rick santorum advocating basically getting rid of all corporate taxes for manufacturers. just get rid of them all. don't pay for. it just get rid of it. let's listen. >> what happened was he became uncompetitive so we need to be competitive. that's why i proposed taking the corporate tax for manufacturers and processors, taking it from 35% and eliminate, it 0% tax, allow this to be the

manufacturing capital of the world again. >> this is just in line with what bachmann said the other night in the last debate saying we shouldn't have to pay any taxes. >> first i think i should say that i'm here to make a citizens arrest of barney frank, if i have a chance. i mean, they are bidding down. pretty soon it's going to be negative numbers on taxation. i mean, her main cane's plan would raise taxes on the poor? michele bachmann says we shouldn't pay taxes. he doesn't want taxes on any manufacturing, but his headline was i want to go to war with china. >> yeah. >> he meant an economic war, but it's like the war language, the rhetoric has to be as excessive as it can for any of these guys to have a chance of winning over those republican primary voters that barney was talking about. >> can i add, by the way, you're talking about not raising taxes. they have backed away from savaging social security and medicare but these are all, they all want to increase military

spending. we're spending at cold war rates of military spending and going all over the world. you cut taxes, you claim that you're going to protect social security and medicare and you increase military spending. they are going to really make the military the volunteers, volunteers in a sense that we won't be able to pay anybody. we'll have to volunteer for people to give us bullets and volunteer people to fly planes. the illogic is incredible. how do you justify that and cut taxes and say social security and medicare will be fine? >> last night, congressman, david they were supposed to stick to economic and, of course, michele bachmann couldn't avoid religious concerns. here she is passing what even my producers think was a joke. i don't think so, talking about the sign of the beast which i learned from some of these characters is apparently 999, herman cane's economic program turned upside down, 666.

let's hear her brand of humor. these michele bachmann desperate. >> when you take the 999 plan and you turn it upside down, i think the devil's in the details. >> yeah. >> what would you say if you are debating a person like that if w.h.o. shifted the topic to the strange far right christian notions about the devil and the sign of the beast? she can't resist that catnip. >> i guess if i were debating her, not just debating her, and i was losing in the polls, i would do exactly what newt gingrich d.you'id. i'd start to say outlandish things and change the subject. >> barney is as outrageous at newt thinks he is. your thoughts? >> i think there's a slight chance, maybe more than slight, that michele bachmann really believes this. >> the sign of the beast. >> that herman cane is the anti-christ. >> she's said so many outlandish

things over the year and she has a very fundamental view of the world. she has a very conspiratorial view of the world. next thing she gets on the show ask her about agenda 21. she believes in black helicopters and everything leading up to the rapture. >> i know. >> so it's not inconceivable that this wasn't a joke. >> let me go back to square one. congressman frank, again, besides being a liberal and a progressive supporter of your interests in your district up there in massachusetts, and you do study politics and history, what has happened to the republican party? why does it look like a tea party-fueled party looks like it's giving up and finding a candidate it likes and looks like it's willing to go with one it doesn't like? >> it's a combination. i think the fact is the economy went very sour during a republican regime, and i want to stress this again. the republicans have had that great success in saying oh, the democrats caused the problem. for six years, 2000 through 2006, which is clearly the time when the economic problems festered and got worse and were ready to blow up, we had

republican control of the presidency, the house and the senate, that's unusual. the last time we had a six-year period of one party controlling all three branches was lyndon johnson so they had control, and it went terribly wrong, and here was this problem. they could not deal with that, and they could not deal with the problems that there was too little regulation, too little government intervention, too little of a public sector along with the private sector, so that were literally kind of driven mad by it and the anger just exploded on themselves. so i guess they had to say, look, they couldn't possibly go to the left. if george bush's administration was a failure in this leading up to the economic crisis and, of course, in the iraq war, the greatest mistake in american history that i believe was the single conscious decision, then the only answer is to go further right. they couldn't stick with bush. they are constitutionally unable to move to a more centrist position so they had then the only place they could go is to the right. that's why you have people like

gingrich and romney and a lot of others far to the right of where they were before. again, the model they have of a bush administration became indefensible and they had to find a new model, and given their ideology, the only one they could find was to the right. >> you're invited back on this program any time you would like, especially when you're accused of a felly by newt gingrich. >> it might have been a serious misdemeanor. >> any time, any place. thank you, congressman barney frank of massachusetts who i do believe has the iq that newt in his delusion thinks he might have had at one point in his earlier life. thank you very much, of course, to david corn. if mitt romney is the republican front-runner, the voters didn't get the membero. they don't have a heart for this guy. polls show romney's numbers have been stagnant while bachmann, and they are perry and now cain have shot to the top. why the tea party doesn't love this romney character. maybe because he's not one of them. you're watching "hardball," only on msnbc. so you think your kidse getting enough vegetables?

yeah, maybe not. v8 v-fusion juice gives them a full serving of vegetables plus a full serving of fruit. but it just tastes like fruit. v8. what's your number? but it just tastes like fruit. [ woman announcing ]bsite there's an easier way. create your own small-business site... with intuit websites. choose a style, customize, publish and get found... from just $7.99 a month. get a 30-day free trial... at intuit.com. is non-stop to seattle? just carry new preparation h totables. discreet, little tubes packed with big relief. from the brand doctors recommend most by name. new preparation h totables. the anywhere preparation h.

we've got new poll numbers in two of the hottest senate races out there. let's check the "hardball" scoreboard. first, massachusetts republican where senator scott brown faces a well-funded challenge from consumer advocate elizabeth warren. right now brown leads but not by much. he's up by 47-42. that's within the reach. good for elizabeth warren up there. next for virginia, for the senate for the seat of the retiring jim webb, governor tim kaine up against former senator george allen, kaine has a one-point lead, 45-44. what a great race. two premiere matchups we'll be watching all the way up to election day. we'll be rooting for one of these candidates.

welcome back to "hardball." for a supposed front-runner, mitt romney still having trouble gaining traction with actual

republican voters n.poll after poll his support has stayed virtually unchanged as other candidates have battled to fill anti-romney, if you will, position. last month it was rick perry in that position. now it appears to be herman cane challenging him. this is despite the fact that he's been strong in debates, mitt romney has, and has racked up a number of impressive endorsements, but what's wrong with mitt romney? will his numbers begin to move now, and here's what we can tell from what the results of the newest nbc news/"wall street journal" poll tells us and that's just out today. compare how republican voters vee mitt romney compared to herman cane. 16% of voters are very positive, 16%, one in 6 are very positive while 28% are very positive towards cain. romney has stronger negative numbers though it's also true more people know who he is having run for so many more news and cain is a newcomer. for more on this we're joined by nicole wallace, a former senior mccain/palin adviser and author

of the book, there it is, and i've been talking to you, jennifer, so i want to start with you about this recently, and i get this sense that there's two fights going on in the republican party. romney is one of those fights, the more establishment republican wing and eastern wing historically and always one of the wings of the republican party, always is and still is the dominant party. conservatives, very anti-government people. they don't have a candidate yet and it is not romney. your thoughts. that's my thought. what's yours? >> i agree with your thoughts. i think one of the reasons that people aren't really talking about that much in a nonsensational way is the fact that romney is a mormon. i think in iowa, for example, where 44% of gop primary voters are evangelical, 42% say they know people -- that the people they know would not vote for romney. that's like saying i won't vote for romney >> i know it does. >> you know, that is a huge obstacle for romney.

that means that the evangelical vote as it moves to iowa, maybe not so much in new hampshire but then as it hits in south carolina and the southern states, if he's got almost half of republican primary voters questioning whether his religion is a cult, he's got a huge problem on his hands. >> well, let me go to nicole on that. i didn't want to start on that. i wanted to start on what seems to be this tissue rejection of romney by the tea party conservative wing of the republican party. address that question raised by jennifer. will his lds religion end up forcing the republicans to look to another candidate between now and next year? >> i don't think so, and i think, chris, you know that every candidate in both parties always has to bring some burden with them on the campaign trail. for john mccain, who is was last candidate i worked for, it was his position on immigration. he had once supported comprehensive immigration reform with the late ted kennedy, so

george w. bush brought some positions that were suspect to the republican base when he ran in the primary in 2000, things he had done in texas with the late lieutenant governor bullock, so every nominee brings a burden of some positions and obstacles. i don't thinkur analysis of what's been going on with the republican side is entirely unfair, but i do think we're seeing a transition. i think as we speak together tonight i think that romney may be -- i think people may be settling in with romney. i think they may be getting more comfortable with the idea that this lusting after all these other guys who have shown no interest in running for president has been detrimental, has been a waste of time, and has been a disservice to the guys who were on the field. whatever you think of our eight nominees, the business of running for president is excruciating, and i think it has been a disservice to the eight candidates who are in the field for our party -- i've called it dysfunctional dating, but it's that age-old phenomenon of wanting what you can't have, so

i'm happy for the party that period seems to be over. >> okay. well then i want to go back to jennifer on this. apart -- let's talk about his lds religion for one more back and forth here. if it is -- well, certainly it's more than a position he holds. it's who he is religiously, and the question is if they are happy two-thirds or three-quarters of evangelicals with the notion that he's a cultist, will they ever put a cultist in the white house? will they have a hand in it? even come november when the choice is obama, now my question to you, jennifer, it's a tough one. if they have to choose between a cultist and obama, who are they going to put in the white house? >> i think that if people believe he's a cultist they will have a lot of trouble turning out for him. what we saw in '96 with dole, what we saw in 2008 with mccain is centrist candidates who couldn't produce a turnout works couldn't win, and they weren't mormons. they weren't a first, so you have to ask yourself in the

middle of a huge recession, in the middle of a time where people are very critical of government, are they going to take the step of electing another first right now in 2012, and is the turnout going to be there for a centrist and a centrist who is moralon, and i don't think we should be afraid to talk about the subject. if romney and another candidate were jewish, we would certainly be talking about whether this country was ready for the first jewish president. i don't think this is off limits, but i do think it goes much beyond romney's religion. he's flip-flopped on issues that evangelicals care about. he's flip-flopped on the life issue. that really resonates. there's still a lot of single-issue voters out there. he's flip-flopped on the issue of gay marriage, and i don't think that people have gotten past the flip-flopping. i don't think nicolle is right that people have accepted romney and settled in. three months out from the elections that begin, i think people will go back to perry. they may go back to bachmann. they may go back to ron paul. they are going to look for a nominee that represents their

ideology. >> let me ask you, nicolle, about this race. two ways it could end right now. it could end slowly over months and months of back and forth with perry coming back, or romney can decide to shoot the moon and go to iowa and say i can beat herman cane who is now the front-runner. i can beat that guy in iowa. what would you recommend, he go for the kill, knock off herman cane and win the whole thing early on? what would you recommend? you sound like you're optimistic about romney winning this thing so i'm asking you the big question, can he win it early? >> look, i am optimistic. i think more of the country than both of you. i don't think that the country only looks at someone's religion. >> i'm not taking a position on this. don't put me in a box. >> so i don't think that's the impediment that -- that we are making. >> the polling numbers keep coming up to say that he's a cultist, that these people in the conservative christian world don't see him as a christian. isn't that a problem, or isn't it?

if they don't think he's a christian, do you think they will vote for him nicolle? if they don't think he's a christian, will they vote for him? >> i think that republicans, tea party members and independents are united in wanting to see president obama and his economic policies which have been so detrimental for the middle class and for the vast majority of this country voted out of office so i think that there will be bigger themes and ideas that unite the country around a candidate like mitt romney. back in 2003, in the democratic party, we were looking at howard dean and wesley clark. all three of us may be talking about the entirely wrong cast of characters so i'm not ready to count anybody out >> i need to -- i need to check in with you, haven't talk with you for a while, nicolle, do you think herman cane would be a great president? >> he would be a great nom thee for our party. how can you ever know? no one can predict. the job issy is extraordinary. that's why i write a novel about

the presidency. it's so extraordinary. you can't predict what kind of president anybody will be until they are in that office. >> that's a wise assessment actually. thank you, nicolle wallace, i think all of better of you, i mean, madam. thank you, jennifer. jennifer, you're strong tonight, very strong. you don't like romney tonight. up next, we've got the final word on herman cane's 999 plan. next in the sideshow. i don't get this anyway. i think it's better than 666 from what i've heard. you're watching "hardball," only on msnbc. ♪ [ cellphone rings ]

cut! [ monica ] i have a small part in a big movie. i thought we'd be on location for 3 days, it's been 3 weeks. so, i used my citi simplicity card to pick up a few things. and i don't have to worry about a late fee. which is good... no! bigger! bigger! [ monica ] ...because i don't think we're going anywhere for a while. [ male announcer ] write your story with the new citi simplicity card. no late fees. no penalty rate. no worries. get started at citisimplicity.com. i have to be a tree in the school play. good. you like trees. well, i like climbing them, but i've never been one. good point. ( captain ) this is your captain speaking. annie gets to be the princess. oh... but she has to kiss a boy. and he's dressed up like a big green frog ! ewww. ( announcer ) fly without putting your life on pause. be yourself nonstop. american airlines.

and here's what we did today: supported nearly 3 million steady jobs across our country... ... scientists, technicians, engineers, machinists... ... adding nearly 400 billion dollars to our economy... we're at work providing power to almost a quarter of our homes and businesses... ... and giving us cleaner rides to work and school... and tomorrow, we could do even more. cleaner, domestic, abundant and creating jobs now. we're america's natural gas. the smarter power, today. learn more at anga.us. delivering mail, medicine and packages.

yet they're closing thousands of offices, slashing service, and want to lay off over 100,000 workers. the postal service is recording financial losses, but not for reasons you might think. the problem ? a burden no other agency or company bears. a 2006 law that drains 5 billion a year from post-office revenue while the postal service is forced to overpay billions more into federal accounts. congress created this problem, and congress can fix it. back to heche. now for the sideshow. first up, giving it all you've got. vice president joe biden is not pleased with last night's defeat of president obama's jobs bill in the u.s. senate. far from it. in an interview on "the "today"" show biden was asked why the president did not launch a bipartisan jobs bill many months

ago? get ready for his no holds barred response. >> he not only rolled up his sleeve, we rolled up our sleeves, our pant legs, we were in our gym shorts working like a devil. they made it clear. that under no circumstances are they prepared to pay for anything that we need to do now so we don't raise the debt further in order to help people have jobs. >> well, who got at this jobs bill who is not too big for the republicans to swallow. he made that point. it was meant to be bite-sized and no wonder the frustrations that republicans didn't bite. next up, how is this for a winning endorsement or not? all starts with tennessee today senator kerry todd, a leading sponsor of a law down that to allow handguns in barrooms. there he is. things went sour for him late last night when he was pulled over and arrested for a dui and what was right next to him as he sat in the driver's seat, a loaded gun, holstered right next to him, according to the police

affidavit. he was, quote, very unsteady on his feet, almost falling down at times. his speech was slurred. his eyes were red, watery and bloodshot. the subject, that's him, was obviously very impaired and not in any condition to be carrying a loaded handgun. well, think he might want to take a back seat now, i would say, in this legislative fight to let people like him carry guns into barrooms. and now for the big number. it's all about that 999. jon huntsman may have joked that he first thought the term referred to the price of a pizza. that didn't push herman cane's economic plan far from front and center throughout the debate last night, mostly thanks to cain himself. let's listen. >> i have put my 999 plan on the table. the 999 plan that i have proposed is simple. 999 is bold, and what 999 does it expands the base. i have proposed 999. put it in the 999 plan. 999 plan. 999 will pass. 999. remember, 99 plan.

999. my top priority is 999. and jobs, jobs, jobs. >> well repetition is the mother of memory. at the very least you can't say he's not trying to get it in there. how many times did mr. cain say 999 during that debate, 25 times. no surprise, 16 of those times came from the former godfather's pizza ceo himself, 999 times 25, that's the big number. that's a big number. vice president joe biden says there's no way president obama will replace him and put hillary clinton on the presidential ticket. any push by any democrat, i can't find them, to make hillary the running mate? that's ahead. you're watching "hardball," only on msnbc.

[ male announcer ] little owen wanted to play, but his nose was raw and sore. achoo! [ male announcer ] and common tissue made it burn even more. ♪ puffs plus lotion is more soothing than common tissue, and it delivers our most soothing lotion for every nose issue. a nose in need deserves puffs plus lotion indeed. to give your cold a comforting scent, try puffs plus lotion with the scent of vicks.

how about the beat of a healthy heart? campbell's healthy request soup is delicious, and earned this heart, for being heart healthy. ♪ feel the beat? it's amazing what soup can do.

i'm veronica de la cruz in the msnbc newsroom with breaking news. here's what's happening. police in california say a gunman wearing body armor shot and killed at least six people at a hair salon in the town of seal beach. three others were critically wounded. police do have a suspect in custody. he was arrested at a traffic stop about a half mile away from the scene. again, nine people have been shot at a hair salon in seal beach. we're going to go ahead and continue to track this developing story and bring another update as soon as we get more information. i'm veronica de la cruz. let's get you back to "hardball." now are you, yes or no? are you on the ticket? >> absolutely positively yes. there's never been a question about that. the president has made that clear, and hardly anybody is

raising it anymore. i guess it's parlor game talk but the parlors are bare down here. >> ann curry certainly raised it on the "today" show and that was vice president biden explaining or plainly stating that he's not going anywhere and will be on the ticket as vice president running with president obama for re-election in 2012. however, news stories that biden will step aside and let hillary clinton step in as vice president still show up here and there. for example, today in "the chicago sun times" the columnist out there laura washington phrase it had like this today, quote, an obama/clinton ticket would be a potent and historic lure. it would pander to female voters, but i suspect they will go with it. so why won't this story just go away completely? joan walsh is the editor at large with "salon" and matt cooper with "the national journal." joan and matt, we're all three professionals. we watch these things come and go. >> rate. >> it seems like if you have a column that's nobody has read lately and you want somebody to

read it, this certainly worked for laura washington today. i shouldn't say that. i don't know her column, but let me say we're talking about it so it worked. is this the way to get a column read, to bring up this proposition? >> sure. >> i've known laura -- i've known laura for a long time, i don't think that's what she was doing, chris. she finds it interesting. people find it perennially interesting, but it's just not going to happen. you know, i'm a huge, huge admirer of hillary clinton. i don't think it's a good idea. i don't think it really adds what people think it would add. the groups that she did well with, certainly women, latinos, the white working class in particular, i don't know that hillary as vp necessarily lures them back. she's not running her own candidacy. she becomes part of a team and i don't see president obama doing that to joe biden. i don't see why. >> let's go to matt cooper, your thoughts. is there anything to this besides, and i know i've written columns to stir the pot. it's good to stir the pot. it gets people thinking.

sometimes i say things on this show, laura, if you're watching, to stir things up, although i'm not sure they are true yet because i think they are emerging or they might emerge. your thoughts, matt? >> yeah. i mean, look, it does stir the pot. she's endlessly interesting, and -- and, look, if there was ever anything, god forbid, that happened to biden's help or something, she'd be the obvious next in line to come in for that jeep spot, but if you look at the presidents who have had to dump their jeveeps jerry ford o nelson rockefeller to move to the right or fdr or wallace, they do it for big political reasons that wouldn't be the same if you exchange biden for hillary. hillary was, as joe said, popular with white working class voters. she picked up two-thirds of white voters in the primary against obama in 2008. biden plays well with those voters. maybe not as well, but well, so you wouldn't really get that much with a hillary on the ticket. >> well, the associated press

reports that hillary clinton said this about her future plans, quote, i am looking forward to being out of public life, whether it's high level appointments like this or elected office. i have no interest in or no plans of any sort to pursue that any more than i am really looking forward to returning to private life. you don't have to give a shermanesque speech for the vice presidency because you can't run for it, joan, but i do wonder. >> right. >> here's my question, something you sort of got to. i always felt bad about jerry ford dumping nelson rockefeller because nelson rockefeller, whatever party you're in, is certainly a public servant and a good one all those years as governor of new york and accepting the vice presidency, and to have him dumped in '76 just to sort of lighten the burden of jerry ford certainly didn't help jerry ford much. >> no. he got beaten. >> exactly, and i don't think -- i don't think it helps barack obama. i think that joe biden has been a good vice president. i think he's helped him out. and, you know, as matt says, he

brings some credibility with some of the same groups that hillary does. now, look, i'm a woman. i'm a feminist. i can't deny that certainly in 2008 she just brought a movement feeling, especially at end of the campaign, to her candidacy, and there would be some of that. no doubt there would be a little bit of that, but would that balance out the feeling of desperation and being disloyal to joe biden that such a move would raise, i just don't -- i don't think it balances it out. i think it's a dangerous -- it's one of those things. the beltway giveth and taketh away. we would love this story because it's a good juicy story, and then the next day it would be oh, my god, barack obama, he's desperate. >> yeah. >> jiden, kicked to the curb, you know. the optics on this, as we like to say, are not very good. >> let's take a look. this was laura washington entirely, a great christopher columb columbusnist. bob woodward, one of the great investigative reporters of all time, perhaps the big one, here he is in an interview october a year ago that actually started

this buzz at one point. let's watch. >> it's on the table, and some of hillary clinton's advisers see it as a real possibility in 2012. president obama needs some of the women, latinos, retirees that she did so well with during the 2008 primaries, and so they switch jobs. >> well, matt cooper, it's hard to read exactly what bob meant there when he says the clinton people are talking this up. >> right. >> the clinton people see it on the table. the clinton people see it as a real possibility. they don't make this call. i mean, if sid bloomenthal or one of the guys over there that would like to see this happen is talking this up, it has no consequence, does it? >> no, it doesn't. i mean, look, there's hillary people always go through a lot of what if? what if it had been us? >> yeah. >> no shortage of obama supporters who are thinking maybe she would have been tougher and a little better taking on john boehner, but, you know, where she is right now is

just physically exhausted. i don't think you can underestimate how tired you must be after eight years as first lady, going right to the u.s. senate, being the senator to new york right after 9/11, going right into a presidential campaign and then logging about 1 billion miles as secretary of state. that is a lot for a 63-year-old. >> you know, i have to say personally, on a personal basis, nobody i like to bump into more and meet than hill hi. i get the biggest giggle out of meeting her. she is something else in person. i say that to our worst enemies, meet her and you'll be amazed. thank you joan walsh and matt cooper. got a little chuckle out of joan with that one. >> an alleged terror plot by iran to assassinate the saudi ambassador here in washington. how high up the ladder did that blot go? this is "hardball," only on msnbc. ♪

[ dr. ling ] i need to get the results from the m.r.i. see if the blood work is ready. review ms. cooper's history. and i want to see katie before she goes home. [ male announcer ] with integrated healthcare solutions from dell, every patient file is where dr. ling needs it. now she can spend more time with patients and less time on paperwork. ♪ dell. the power to do more. boy, a lot -- all of us have been watching these anti-wall street, there they are, protests around the country, especially up on wall street. well, now we have our first idea of what americans think of those

demonstrations. our new nbc/"wall street journal" poll out today asked people whether they support or oppose the protests. a plurality tend to support that, something less than 50, but 37% say they tend to support the occupy wall street protests versus 18% who say they oppose them. that 18 is a pretty low number. that suggests the protests might have legs and more importantly political value to the democrats especially. we'll be right back. the kincaids live here. across the street, the padillas. ben and his family live here, too. ben's a re/max agent, and he's a big part of this community. there are lots of reasons why re/max agents average more sales than other agents. experience, certainly.

but maybe it's also because they care about the markets they serve and the neighbors who rely on them. nobody sells more real estate than re/max. visit remax.com today. ♪ that's good morning, veggie style. hmmm [ male announcer ] for half the calories -- plus veggie nutrition. could've had a v8.

the idea that you would assassinate a diplomat, that is something for the whole world, every nation in the world will learn the facts of this will be

outraged. this is all about keeping the world united in opposition to the activities of iran, and we've taken nothing off the table. we will take nothing off the table. >> welcome back to "hardball." that's vice president biden this morning, of course, reacting to the alleged plot to assassinate the saudi ambassador here in washington. so what does this alleged plot tell us about iran's terrorism ambitions and how high up in the iranian government does this plot actually go? we don't know. evan coleman is an msnbc terrorism analyst and robin wright is a fellow at the united states institute of peace and the woodrow wilson center and also author of "rock the casbar." what do we know now? >> the united states has made some very serious allegations about iran's attempt to assassinate the saudi ambassador. this is a fascinating story because iran is capable of so much more. it was engaged in the support role, allegedly, behind the largest loss of u.s. military life in a single incident since

world war ii in the bombing of the marine barracks in lebanon in 1982. it's been involved, allegedly, in bombings of u.s. embassies. it's allegedly been involved in allegedly involved in attacks in iraq and afghanistan, in facilitating, arming, so foust on forth. >> so hezbollah? >> through hezbollah, through proxies. this case doesn't make sense in a lot of ways. if it's true, something dramatic has changed in iran. >> how they got away with it, the assassins, if they would have gotten caught, they would have talked? >> most of the time iran has yew cutouts, and it's been quite effective. the idea of using a car salesman from corpus christi, texas working through the mexican cartel is not clearly in keeping with past operations. >> let me go to an expert. evan coleman, would they risk getting caught? it seems like our fbi would be

able to trace that to them. >> the calculus here is very strange. if you try to imagine this as the product of collective thinking on the part of the iranian government, it seems like this is russian roulette. if you killed the saudi ambassador to the u.s., you would be guaranteeing a very serious u.s. reaction, and i would believe a military one, so it's difficult to understand this as a product of collective thinking. it's much easier to try to understand this as maybe the product of a rogue individual within the sflst guard or the qods force, or maybe something who is powerful and senior. you wonder how much had a fingerprints on this. >> what's the purpose of killing the saudi ambassador here in washington? what would you gain strategically if you're already hated by the united states, under all kinds of embargoes by the west, this would add to the hatred and fear of ran ace troublemaking.

>> yeah, and i think most importantly, especially for the countries involved here, iran desperately needs china to stay out of what's going on at the u.n. security council. if china all of a sudden had a reason, i.e. instability in saudi arabia, to be in favor of greater sanctions against iran, it just doesn't make any sense. the chinese are staying out of this. the last thing iran wants to do is push them in cooperating with the u.s. it's a very strange calculus. >> one thing missing in the debates last night, i want to shift a little because you know this stuff, you would have expected the real right wing candidates like bachmann over there -- i don't think romney is or huntsman -- they would be pushing the iran button right now. why don't we do this for israel? why don't we do this for us? you used to expect that bell to wring. how come that bell hasn't rung yet in the debates. it should be coming up all the

time, you would think. >> romney has talked about a line in the sand, which against is another reason it doesn't make sense, this is a time iran is trying to avoid more sanctions because of his controversial nuclear program. iran doesn't want to be an issue in the american presidential election, so the timing of this doesn't work. the fact that no one has yet talked about iran in more specific terms, it will come. >> do we have a right-wing -- a far -- an extremi government in tehran right know that might support something like an attack here? evan? >> i just don't think so. say what you like about ahmadinejad, i don't think he'll win any award for a nobel peace prize. he of all people wants to avoid a direct confrontation, so it seems very strange. >> thank you very much for coming. i love that assessment, thank you evan kohlmann and robin

wright. when we return, let me return with the clown show. you're watching "hardball," only on msnbc. [ male announcer ] wouldn't it be cool

if you took the top down on a crossover? if there were buttons for this? wouldn't it be cool if your car could handle the kids... ♪ ...and the nurburgring? or what if you built a car in tennessee that could change the world? yeah, that would be cool. nissan. innovation for today. innovation for tomorrow. innovation for all. ♪

let me finish tonight with this -- i don't think the republican party is enjoying a robust competition for its nomination. in a year when you would expect a feisty all-out battle for the nomination, the chance to go one on one with a weakened democratic president, you would

expect to see several serious candidates testing each other's abilities. instead it's been a bizarre pattern of one conservative candidate after another put up his head, then bow it, trump bachmann, perry, christie. the head up now is herman contain, but the pattern is clear. each rises and then fades, each with one main appeal as an alternative to mitt romney. last night this odd ritual of despair on the tea party-led right to what a fair-minded observer might think of a clown show, but for the sober-minded romney, think of what was on display last night, rick perry confessing he came to a debate on the economy without a plan for jobs. did the dog eat his homework? a u.s. congresswoman responding to a proposal by another candidate by saying his 999 tax proposal could be a cover for 666, the sign of the beast.

what did ms. bachmann mean by saying this in a presidential debate? was it a joke? if so, where is the humor in making an off-the-wall reference to the devil or was she simply clowning around? what did she mean when she warned students would be paying a 75% income tax rate? what did former senator santorum mean when he said he wanted to eliminate all together the corporate tax on manufacturing and replace it with what? what kind of conversation was that last night around that table? then in a special category of ma levelens came newt gingrich's charge that senator chris dodd and congressman barney frank should be imprisoned for passing regulation regulating financial institutions. this seemed to actually fit in last night around the strange table, where one person seemed to be the adult, and so many others were simply acting the part of clowns, doing anythi