because he was speaking very low. just so that i could hear it. and earlier i had told him if he supports darrell issa's bill to reform the post office that 200,000 jobs could be lost. 20% of those employees are veterans. and mr. walsh came up to me. he said, "i do not care about the loss of public sector jobs." >> there you have it. melissa rakestraw, great to have you with us tonight. you tell a great story. >> thanks a lot. >> that's who they are. they're called republicans. that's "the ed show." i'm ed schultz. rachel maddow starts right now tonight. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, ed. spectacular show tonight. i love you that got her on the air tonight. when i saw her in that video, i could not believe how cool under pressure she was. that was great. >> thank you. >> thanks, man. all right. and thanks to you at home for joining us for the next hour. are you ready for the worst analogy that's ever been acted out on television? all right. here's the scene.

where are we? we are on a street. here, wait. what was i doing? i was driving a car. what's that? person i just ran over in a crosswalk. now, what is the herman cain argument in this situation? listen, officer, listen, i know -- i know. but look at all these other people walking around safely, safe and sound in this street scene. i drove right past them, and they're all fine. i mean, yeah. but the vast majority of people in the street who i drove by have not been hit by my car. officer. that's the herman cain argument. >> for every one person that comes forward with a false accusation there are probably -- there are thousands who would say none of that sort of activity ever came from herman cain. >> so says herman cain.

even for the worst crimes, you know what? it is not a great defense to make the proportion argument, as in, you know, most people i've met, most people i've driven past in the street, i didn't kill them. but even if you believe that there's no chance that herman cain will win the republican combination or come anywhere near being elected president, the scandal around him has now become a national phenomenon in its own right. we are now having a big national fight about not just harassment but about accountability, about how we handle serious allegations about powerful people, about prominent people. very little of the cain campaign and now the conservative movement's response to the allegations surrounding his candidacy have had to do with the substance of the allegations, with answering whether or not herman cain actually did harass anybody. talking points memo has been putting together a list titled "things that don't affect whether herman cain sexually harassed two women in the 1990s." it's now actually a giant two-part omnibus list. here's another one. "more things that don't affect whether herman cain sexually

harassed several women in the '90s." when asked about these sexual harassment charges, we've heard a lot of stuff. >> the lady didn't even work for the company. >> i've also seen situations where women have sexually -- attempted to sexually harass men. >> the machine to keep a businessman out of the white house is going to be relentless. >> a lot of people have a fact -- have a problem with the fact that i'm doing so well and i'm so likeable. >> they ought to be asking questions about president obama and his relationship with bill ayers. >> to one of the women and we've come to find out her son works at political. the organization -- >> have you confirmed that? i've been hearing that all day, rumors about that. you've confirmed that now, right? >> we confirmed it with -- that he does indeed work at political and that's his mother, yes. >> actually, that last thing, that has nothing to do with whether or not herman cain

actually sexually harassed women in the 1990s. that last one also was just flat out not true. the reporter, who is not related to the accuser, also does not work at politico. but nice try. and you know, for what it's worth, the national restaurant association, when some of this stuff allegedly took place, i mean, i don't know what they think about bill ayers or politico or whatever, but the national restaurant association seemed at the time to think that these were not just wild accusations against herman cain. to the extent that matters, right? at least they took these allegations seriously enough at the time that the organization decided to pay tens of thousands of dollars out to the women who made these allegations so they wouldn't take them any further. now, the cain campaign of course maintains that he didn't do any of these things, that he has never acted inappropriately toward anyone. but there's not just anonymous allegations. there's named allegations. and there's evidence of paid settlements to resolve past allegations. the reason this scandal has entered a whole new level today is not because the cain campaign says they've raised more than $9 million since october 1st and

they're chalking that up to the awesome fund-raising power of being accused of sexual harassment. it's not just because the republican debate audience in michigan last night distinguished itself by applauding mr. cain when the sexual harassment allegations were raised. no, the reason this is important today is because of the question that's at the root of this whole scandal. did herman cain sexually harass anybody? if herman cain did sexually harass women in the workplace in the past, consider what his campaign lawyer has just done. his attorney has just given an interview to the "atlanta journal-constitution" in which he says, "to any other women who might think about making allegations about mr. cain and sexual harassment," the attorney says, "they should think twice." so if herman cain's actually done any of this stuff, if you are a woman out there and you have ever been sexually harass the by herman cain, his campaign is saying shut up, think twice

before you say anything about it. it's kind of an accountability moment. not so much in that anybody's being held accountable. but because this is a pretty remarkable moment for what it means to be held accountable in america. if you have been sexually harassed by herman cain, think twice before you say anything about it. and the threat does not appear to be idle. the day after one woman publicly accused mr. cain of sexual harassment, mr. cain's campaign set up a website dedicated to attacking her career and her personal life. "new york post" columnist andrea peyser made fun of her hair and her makeup, calling her face heavily painted, saying she would need a new tube of eyeliner soon and referring to her as a bleached blond. here's what tv host bill curtis had to say about the same woman on talk radio. >> you're already hearing from some people who may have worked with this woman or know this woman and aren't surprised that she'd be making these types of allegations or that she's someone want to exaggeration. is that what you're saying?

>> let's put herman and sharon in the car at the same time and the roles may even have been reversed, given the track record. >> who would know? >> ooh. you know what i'm hearing. that's what's happening to the first woman who went public. another woman who accused herman cain of sexual harassment and who was outed as an accuser this week had this item posted about week had this item posted about

i mean, if the end of this exercise is not to make herman cain president of the united states, there are two things that this is doing right now, two types of work that this is doing right now in the american mind and in the american polity. one is to model how we deal with sexual harassment as americans and whether who the alleged perpetrator is of that harassment makes a difference as to whether you're allowed to blow the whistle on him. whether who the alleged

perpetrator is affects whether you are allowed to speak out about it. the other thing that's happening here more directly is that the republican party and the conservative movement and conservative media in particular is marketing itself to the lady voters of america. >> do they want to synchronize their menstrual periods? why appear together? >> the lady didn't even work for the company. >> the day of the fire storm of these accusations we had the highest fund-raising day online in the history of this campaign, and it has not stopped. >> do you think the other candidates will follow suit and hire women to charge them with sexual harassment? >> if they're smart, they will. >> joining us now is dolly lithwaite, slate magazine's legal editor. dahlia, good to have you on the show. thanks for being here. >> hey, rachel. >> you have written about this recently, that republicans in part are just essentially denying the existence of a thing called sexual harassment. are we now even beyond that now where it's being claimed as an asset, being accused of sexual harassment is actually a point of pride in some way? >> right. first of all, just from your setup there, don't you feel like

the entire country is run by 8 1/2-year-old boys? it's just an amazing -- you know, that here we are in 2011 and we're having a conversation that we thought we put behind us decades ago. i think the most striking thing is if you think about the architecture of sexual harassment law in this country it used to be the case that it was impossible for a woman to come forward and say, i am the subordinate, someone powerful and important harassed me. it would ruin her life. it is amazing that we've put into place an entire legal system that encourages her to come forward, that protects her from being called a hooker and a gold digger for coming forward, and yet still she's a hooker and a gold digger despite this legal architecture. so it's really an amazing thing, that having acknowledged that we have a problem, put into place a legal system that's supposed to protect women. now when women come forward men are still the victims. they're more the victims than ever before.

and women are subjected to the exact kind of completely hideous, insulting, sexist stereotyping that used to happen 50 years ago before we even talked about this. it's really an amazing thing that we have a system in place that protects women not at all. >> you know, the reason that i wanted to lead the show with this tonight, the reason i felt like this was literally the most important thing in politics today is because i felt actually shocked -- i'm shocked by very little in politics. i was actually shocked to read the think twice comments from the herman cain lawyer. and it occurs to me, and the reason i wanted to talk to you about it, is maybe this is actually sort of normal in sexual harassment litigation and sexual harassment legal politics right now that there is open intimidation of accusers now, that if you say somebody has harassed you you should expect to be intimidated, to be told overtly even publicly that you will be dragged through the mud for doing it. is that true? is that normal?

or did that just used to be normal in the '50s and we thought we outgrew it? >> no, it's insane. your shocked response is exactly the right response. no lawyer in this current regime that we have can appropriately say don't bring a claim. you know, you've genuinely been harassed. think twice about coming forward. as i said before, the entire system is set up to smoke out harassment. it's predicated on the idea, rachel, that there's a huge imbalance of power and that the harasser is not the one that needs to be served by the system. and so for an attorney to come forward who knows this and to say i'm going to use the force of my legal wisdom and this system that's in place to intimidate women from reporting, the chilling effect is horrifying. and so i think you're quite right. it's worse than having no system at all when you have a system, and you're discouraged from using it.

>> let me ask you a sort of pseudohypothetical on this. i don't believe the herman cain campaign poses any risk of nominating him to -- making him the republican party's nominee or making him president. but i do think what's happened around the sexual harassment issue now is a very big issue for the country because it's essentially a demonstration project of how to deal with that. given that, if you were herman cain's campaign manager or if you were herman cain and these allegations were made and you legitimately felt that you had not done anything wrong, that those settlements were just to make them go away, they were handled as a legal matter, there was not an admission of guilt and all of these accusations are false, which is what the cain campaign maintains. what would be a more responsible way to move forward in the political arena if that's what you felt? given the fact this is being acted out on a national stage and will really affect how the country feels about this. >> i mean, i guess i can only respond by saying what i wouldn't do is impugn the accusers. i wouldn't call them, you know,

tramps and pole dancers. i wouldn't suggest that they're litigious gold diggers. i think that what you try to do is say look, this was resolved on the merits. you don't call them anonymous accusers when they're in fact circumscribed by a settlement agreement, they cannot come forward. in other words, i think that every characterization that's been made in this -- by this campaign has been to create a box whereby if a woman reports she's a gold digger, if she doesn't report, she's also a gold digger. if she comes forward, she's a liar. if she doesn't come forward, she's also a liar. so the point has to be let's address this on the merits, let's not start from the assumption that every single woman is desperate, desperate to speed-dial a plaintiff's attorney and humiliate the candidate. let's start from the assumption that we have two competing narratives and we need to sort it out. but not under the assumption that the narrative from the accuser is tainted by the fact she's a woman and a lie sxr

looking to get rich and get a book deal. >> dahlia lithwick, legal editor from slate magazine. thanks for writing about this so clearly recently, dahlia. it's a very -- it's a topic that's sort of very easy to go off the rails and you've been very clear about it. thanks for talking to us tonight. i appreciate it. >> thanks, rachel. >> all right. funny thing happened while everyone else was watching herman cain and rick perry say some astonishing things. some actual stuff got done in washington. stuff that's good enough to tha i'm a little afraid to talk about it because i might jinx it. the host of msnbc's excellent new weekend show "up", "up with chris hayes," will join us next. eny al eblllutho

p. is n n anstngmere do anhaca't

veterans day is tomorrow. which sort of makes this veterans week. and on this veterans day, veterans week, spare a particular thought for republican senator jim demint of south carolina. not because he's a veteran. i don't think that he is. but because rather jim demint apparently has a frigging problem. today on capitol hill there was a vote on a hiring bill for our nation's veterans. right now our national unemployment rate's about 9% for iraq and afghanistan veterans. it is 12.1%. which is both miserable and sort of astonishing because iraq and afghanistan veterans are a ferociously competent group of americans. they have spent the last decade doing incredibly difficult, complex, exhausting, tireless,

underappreciated work. i'm not being romantic about this. i mean it in practical terms. this is an impressive, professional class of americans with a lot to offer. they really did do more before 9:00 a.m. than most of us did all day. and they did it all decade long, and they are still doing it. for us as a country our iraq and afghanistan vets are a huge asset. if you are hiring people at your company, you should be looking for them for hiring. that said, they have trouble in the job market in part because while the people they're competing against for jobs have been working here veterans have been working and great experience but they have been doing it out of sight and out of mind in, say, landlocked central asia. so they are this very impressive group. they are underperforming in the job market. and we know why. and oh, by the way, we do kind of owe them as a country. and so today the world's least controversial bill came before the senate, the vow to hire heroes act of 2011. a tax credit for businesses to hire new veterans. congress is debating all sorts

of different tax credits to hire people. this one is to hire veterans. and it does not even add to the deficit. they moved money around from other veterans programs to pay for this one. this is in the running for least controversial thing in washington. it is good for the economy. it is good for our souls quite frankly. it is practically helpful to people who need practical help in a way that also helps all the rest of us too because it is a jobs program. the vote on this thing today was 94-1. the bill passed 94-1. the 1 was senator jim demint. why is senator jim demint against this? is it some cockamamie jim demint tea party fetishistic states' rights idea about gold bullion or something? no, not in this case. it wasn't anything like this. jim demint's reasoning for voting against this was that veterans don't deserve it. >> i cannot support this tax credit because i do not believe the government should privilege one american over another when it comes to work. >> yeah, those greedy veterans,

wanting all this special treatment. greedy veterans expecting everything to be handed to them. yeah, happy veterans day, senator demint. i would salute you, but the way i want you is not something that's allowed on television. it almost makes me want to sit on my hands. the veterans bill, aside from the blistering astonishment that is jim demint, is an example of things sort of secretly actually getting done in d.c. right now. here's another example. yesterday the fcc announced that the nation's biggest cable companies will start offering high-speed internet service to low-income families for the reduced price of $9.95 a month. any family that has a kid who qualifies for the free school lunch program will be eligible to get broadband internet service that they otherwise probably would not be able to afford. this is a real concrete step. it is connecting the poorest americans to the 21st century economic backbone of our country. so this week alone, veterans jobs bill, check. minus jim demint.

broadband internet for low-income families, check. here's one more. putting people back to work building roads and bridges. check. maybe? yeah. one of the other secret things that took a giant step forward toward getting done this week was a long-term infrastructure bill to fund highway projects across the country. yesterday the senate environment and public works committee advanced the highway bill by a unanimous vote of 18-0. every single democrat and every single republican voted for this infrastructure bill. i feel like i'm jinxing it by even reporting on it. listen in the hearing room. this is a quick clip. listen to what it sounded like right after they took the vote in that committee yesterday. here's what happened right afterwards until they turned the mikes off. >> the bill as amended is reported favorably to the united states senate. my thanks to everyone. we stand adjourned. >> okay. >> oh, my. >> we did it. >> okay, we did it. oh, my.

i think what we just heard democratic senator barbara boxer saying there before the mike was cut out was "oh, my god, we did it." oh, my god, is this really happening? joining us is chris hayes, host of msnbc's excellent new weekend show called "up with chris hayes." chris, it's great to see you. >> it's great to see you, rachel. >> do i have the soft bigotry of low expectations? am i applauding things that -- >> you need to come in and rain on the parade. no, i thought the senate -- i thought there was a sort of vestigial senatorial functionality that we saw in those two bills you mentioned. the fact that mcconnell put out a good press release on it. this is the kind of thing that as you said is non-controversial, it's almost routine and programatic. it's the kind of thing that the senate and the house should be able to come together and do. and we have been in such a horribly dysfunctional knot since the 2010 mid-terms they haven't been able to do it. i think there's something about that and the bill getting out of the senate. the other part of the story, the highway bill, is the house has its own version of the highway bill which does not reconcile

very well with the senate version of the highway bill and spends a lot less money and the house is really where the kind of stopping gap is right now. there are things you can get in the senate with the democratic majority and with the sort of vestigial kind of collegiality. it's the house i think that's the really worrisome roadblock right now. >> that said, when we had just an infrastructure bill put forward by senator amy clobeshar, who is not known for her partisan legislating at all, put forward with joe manchin, who is maybe one of the most conservative democrats, definitely one of the most conservative democrats in the senate last week, ben nelson and joe lieberman voted against it and republicans were able to successfully filibuster it. but now we're able to see some more roads and bridges stuff move forward in another way. so why do we get to move forward on the highway bill and we don't get to move forward on the one that's attached to president obama's jobs bill? >> well, i think implied in your question is the fact that it is

clearly the case that -- it's a little like groundhog day reporting on it, right? because every day the republicans come in and every day they want to block what the president is doing. in fact, the veterans bill had to be so non-controversial that it could pass 94-1. and that's the threshold? you know? things can either pass 94-1, you're naming a post office, you're giving tax savings to veterans, or they can get blocked. it's those two options. there's nothing in the middle. there's nothing in this current political terrain that can pass by a five vote margin or vix-vote margin or two-vote margin in the senate. because the habitual use of the filibuster and the political commitment on the part of the minority caucus to politically destroy the president in the run-up to the election is so strong it means going after everything the president has his name attached to. >> even in that environment do you have a veterans day wish for senator demint? >> veterans day wish for senator demint. i will say is this to senator demint. it was -- he displayed a genuine fidelity to his cockamamie principles. >> what principles? if he'd come one some crazy tenth amendment like gold standard, like we shouldn't

legally elect senators thing, fine. but veterans don't deserve it? really, jim? really? >> but here's the thing. look, the argument that that part of the republican caucus is making and that is clearly taking over the republican caucus is that everything is distortion. and so when you come to view every single thing the government does as distortion, as some sort of pure and natural state of the market, then it's very easy to view a tax credit to hire veterans as a distortion, as something unnatural, as opposed to the thing that is unnatural, being the 12% unemployment rate of veterans themselves. and that exactly is the kind of through the looking glass perspective that i think we see broadly from the base of the republican party and the most ideological members, is that the crisis we are in right now, the crisis of joblessness, the crisis of unemployment and foreclosures and personal bankruptcies is the natural state and the interventions to change them and fix them is unnatural. >> is unnatural and -- is unnatural and should not even be evaluated on its merits because -- >> because it is ideologically

offensive. >> well, i will just say, jim, if anybody runs into jim demint at a veterans day parade, please tell him hi for me. chris hayes, host of "up with chris hayes," which you really are doing great work. i knew you would, but you are doing great work. the show is so good. >> it means so much to me. >> thanks, chris, appreciate it. spinal tap still ahead. and rick perry's amazing brain freeze. and what's important about it. and what to do with that pesky 30-foot crack in your nuclear reactor, ohio. that's all ahead.

it's three agencies of government when i get there that are gone. commerce, education, and the -- what's the third one there? let's see. >> you need five. >> oh, five. okay. commerce, education, and the -- >> epa? >> epa. there you go. >> seriously? is epa the one you were talking about or -- >> no, sir. we were talking about the agencies of government -- the epa needs to be rebuilt. no doubt about that. >> but you can't name the third one? >> the third agency of government i would do away with, the education, the -- >> commerce. >> commerce. and let's see. >> oh, my. >> i can't. the third one i can't. sorry. oops. >> okay. in the last 24 hours there have been two huge deals in american politics about energy.

first, after months of sometimes really big protests against it the obama administration's expected approval of a tar sands pipeline right through one of the biggest sources of fresh water in our country has been at least delayed for at least a year. the obama administration saying that one source of the delay in the decision on the keystone xl pipeline is that they're considering alternate routes for it. the other major energy development over the last 24 hours is of course the energy department's good fortune that rick perry plum forgot his plan to kill them. that's coming up.

it's three agencies of government when i get there that are gone. commerce, education, and the -- what's the third one there? let's see. >> you need five. >> oh, five. okay. so commerce, education, and -- the -- >> we have done everything that we could possibly do.

we have -- did what was right for arizona. >> was it before he was before the social programs from the standpoint of he was for standing up for roe versus wade before he was against verse -- roe versus wade. he was for race to the top. he's for obama care, and now he's against it. >> under secretary of defense douglas fife seldom in my life have i met a dumber man. >> the coolest thing happens. i roll in here, and i get to meet a real live angel. in the form of christopher duffly.

and then i get to meet a real-life hero in katherine adair. i mean, my life -- today has been awesome, girl. >> some people out there in our nation don't have that. and i believe that our education, like such as in south africa and the iraq, everywhere such as, i believe that they should -- our education over here in the u.s. should help the u.s. -- or should help south africa. >> you can't name the third one? >> the third agency of government -- >> yeah. >> -- i would do away with the education, the -- >> commerce. >> commerce. and let's see. i can't. the third one i can't. i'm sorry. oops. >> the pantheon of very public long pauses, deliberate and not deliberate. amazing political brain freezes and pregnant pauses done for

effect. a dumber man. the pantheon of those things is chock full of rick perry. that cup runneth over. last night what governor perry was trying mightily to remember is that the third government agency he would abolish if he were president is this one, the department of energy, d.o.e. the energy department operates almost 40 facilities across the nation. so hard we would have had to triple our graphics department to name them all on this map. the sites include the los alamos national laboratory. ring a bell? during world war ii that's where robert oppenheimer and company became death, the destroyer of worlds. los alamos is where we built the world's first atomic bomb. los alamos is one of two stilts in the country that still works on designing nuclear weapons and a million other things. it's got a $2 billion budget. it spans 36 square miles. roughly 10,000 employees there. what rick perry couldn't remember last night is that he wants to abolish that. same goes for the oakridge facility in tennessee.

there they do awe-inspiring specialized work like studying matter at the atomic, nuclear, and subnuclear levels. if you don't know what that means, don't worry, because the scientists at oakridge do know what that means, and thank god for that. experimental nuclear physics is not for the faint of heart, nor is it for some local town's budget. but if rick perry were president and he could remember to do it, that would be gone. we don't need it. and in akin, south carolina it's the energy department's savannah river national lab, working on perfecting the art of detecting weapons of mass destruction. please keep working on that one. they also work on the cleanup of contaminated groundwater and soils, the development of hydrogen as a safe energy source. savannah river also works with the wounded warrior care project to retrain america's wounded vets. governor perry thinks, he can't quite remember, but he thinks he wants to abolish all of that too. which would be amazing even if he hadn't forgotten it and said "oops."

but as long as that's the most amazing tape of the day and we're talking about the forgotten energy department because rick perry had a hilarious brain freeze about it, there is something i would like to talk about about this because at the energy department's idaho national lab in idaho falls this week, 16 people were apparently just accidentally exposed to plutonium. two of them have evidence of plutonium in their tissue. four of them were given intravenous flushing of their systems to try to get radioactive material out. others had confirmed contamination of their skin, which could indicate internal exposure. the accidental plutonium exposure apparently happened while the workers were handling spent nuclear fuel at this lab. and if it is okay to talk nukes because rick perry had his hilarious brain freeze while he was trying to remember he wanted to abolish the department of energy, i have another question about nuclear energy while we're on the subject because on the shores of lake erie in ohio the davis bessie nuclear power plant has been shut down since october 1st. that's when inspectors accidentally discovered a

30-foot-long crack in the concrete wall around one of the reactors. inspectors decided to do some more testing. they took concrete samples. that's when they found more cracks. they found hairline cracks they say in 15 out of the 16 design components of the building. the union of concerned scientists says in a letter this week they're very concerned about the structural problems at davis-besse, which makes me want to ask clarifying questions of all of these things of a senior staff scientist in the union of concerned scientists. so joining us tonight for "the interview" is dr. ed wyman. dr. wyman, thanks very much for being here. >> thanks for having me again. >> the company that's operates the davis-besse plant is saying that the cracks in the wall around these reactors is not dangerous because those walls are just, in their words, architectural parts of the building. what is your response to that? >> well, the containment structure in a nuclear power plant is only really needed in the event of a severe accident. and if you recall, before

fukushima we thought that severe accidents were so improbable that we really didn't have to worry too much about them. but in the case where do you have an event where the core overheats, melts, and potentially causes a large radiological release, you do need that containment building to be as structurally intact as possible. so the fact that there are large cracks in it now again doesn't matter unless we have an accident. >> in terms of how this was discovered, as far as i can tell from the narrative that we've got, the press around this and the information that's been released by the company, we know about all of the cracks in all of the other parts of this reactor facility because of the big giant 30-foot-long one that they couldn't ignore. it wasn't like somebody was doing inspections anyway. they only found these because they went looking for them, almost by accident. does that concern you, just about the systematic inspection and maintenance issues here? >> well, this is a genuine problem.

as the nation's nuclear reactors age, you really do need to do more intensive maintenance and inspections because you can't assume that you know everything that's going on with these aging processes. so but of course the more inspections that you do the more expensive it gets. so there's a constant struggle between, you know, how much you actually have to search for things that you don't necessarily know will be there. and so it's this struggle that's one of the major problems that we worry about with regard to aging plants. how do you discover things that you really don't expect before they cause a major problem? >> aging seems to be one of the issues that was relevant in the idaho plutonium exposure case as well. they're describing a container for some spent nuclear fuel that may have been corroded. 16 people there potentially exposed to plutonium. how scary a situation is that? can you put that into in-some context for us? >> well, the larger context is that the department of energy oversees a complex of

facilities, many of which are, again, aging. they're cold war era facilities. they were used for decades to process radioactive materials and the production of nuclear weapons. and the cleanup of those facilities and the maintenance of that legacy is one of the huge burdens that the department of energy has. that is one good reason why we really can't abolish the department of energy, is because there's no other agency that would be willing or able to manage these sites and deal with the radioactive contamination. and as this incident shows, even the department of energy doesn't always know what it's doing. so this is a problem across the complex. we do have a wide variety of radioactive materials, of aging facilities that need to be managed in the most careful way possible to avoid contamination of the environment, exposure to the worker population, and potential contamination and expoeshz of the public.

>> ed lyman, senior staff scientist from the union of concerned scientists, thanks for your time in helping us to understand this. i'm glad we could talk to you about it. >> thank you. >> right after this show on "the last word" tonight lawrence o'donnell's guest to break down last night's debate is a man named tim pawlenty. just as a sidebar if anyone could convince tim pawlenty to get back in the race it's lawrence o'donnell. i'm very much looking forward to that. and here still to come, spinal tap.

[ male announcer ] new vis nature fusion cold & flu syrup. flavored with real honey. powerful cold medicine that leaves out artificial flavors and dyes and instead uses something more natural, honey. new vicks nature fusion cold & flu. ♪

moscow, we have a problem. i don't mean to be alarming, but right now, there is a 30,000-pound russian rocket circling the earth loaded with roughly 11 tons of toxic fuel called nitrogen titroxide. it is a probe that is on top of the big dumb rocket was to scoop this up and bring it back once it got to mars's moon, but sut -- but it is not getting there. and it is slowly falling inexorably down to earth when the booster engines of the rocket failed to fire. they were supposed to send it out of the earth's atmosphere to

get up to mars's moon and the engines were going to use all of the hydrogene and send it to mars, but this is purportedly shot at noon on tuesday when the first engine is to fire. but that little dot is the rocket doing what is it not supposed to be doing. the reason that brazil were looking for this rocket at the time is that the russian space program crowd sourced the launch. instead of sending a reconnaissance ship to south america to monitor the rocket's expense, they asked amateur sky watchers to help them out. the last time nasa tried a deep space mission, it did not work out then either. this is nbc news at sunrise with linda vester. >> good morning, everyone. the world of science and nation of russia have suffered a setback. the exploration of mars have come to an end.

pieces of a probe have fell back to earth plunging into ocean southeast of easter island and some 1,800 miles northwest of santiago, chile. it boosted off from kazakhstan, and one of the rocket boosters failed to ignite properly. they lost ground contact, and the rocket got stuck in earth's orbit. >> as you can tell from the hairdo, it was in 1996, and what is happening now is amazingly similar but this one at least does not have plutonium, but it is tons and tons and tons of rocket fuel. you can be one of the work for free space trackers of this thing, of the rocket if you want to be according to the live track online, it is somewhere west of indonesia, vaguely. my eyes are not good enough to tell. well, west of australia, yep. while it is still up there, the russian rocket scientists do have time to figure out what the

problem is and maybe fix it, but they probably have a few days left before its batteries die. mission controllers say they have a few attempts to send commands, but so far not which means tons of these chemicals may be heading back home to earth one of these days in a rather uncontrolled fashion. today i learned the phrase bojamoi, and correct me on this, but that is russian for omg.

introducing the perfect situp. invented by the u.s. navy seal who brought you the perfect pushup, the perfect situp re-invents the situp by combining the upper ab crunch with the lower ab leg lift. then the perfect situp adds an audible coach. you'll hear a click when you've done the exercise correctly. you hear it and you'll feel it.

it's this one-two punch that gets you better faster results. traditional situps and crunches are hard to do, and only effectively work half your abs -- the upper half. but the perfect situp targets and tones the upper abs and the lower abs. the secret is the combination of perfect position and resistance. with the addition of the patent pending perfect situp leg blades you'll activate all your abs. the inner obliques, the outer obliques, the upper abs, and the hard to reach deep lower abs. in fact, a university study shows the perfect situp double crunch delivers a significantly more effective abdominal contraction than a regular crunch. and when you flatten the abs below the belt that sucks in the gut and helps you get into those skinny jeans. and that's what helps get fantastic results like this for kara, and chris and elliott and the perfect situp makes it all easy. your head is fully supported and there's no strain on your neck. you can even use the perfect situp in a chair. just remove the leg blades and use it seated. and when you're done with your workout the perfect situp stores away. it hangs in a closet.

so don't work half your abs. get a flat, toned stomach. work all your abs with the perfect situp. so here's the deal. get the perfect situp in your home for just 4 easy payments of $19.95 when you order you'll receive the perfect situp complete with adjustable head rest, adjustable and upgradeable 10 pound resistance leg blades, comfortable gym quality foam pad, the essential perfect situp cardio workout guide and reduced calorie meal plan and the ab crunching and perfect situp workout chart. but wait! if you call right now we'll take away one payment. that's right, get the original perfect situp, for just 3 easy payments of $19.95! but you've got to call right now. carve away inches from your stomach. get a perfect situp. call now.

today, november 10th, 2011, and hello ancient mayans we are on the way. tomorrow is digital clock styling is a perfect paladrone, and it is 11-11-11 and it is also an inverted palindrome as well. and apparently a lot of people are planning to get married on 11-11-11 and maybe those people love the palindromes as much as each other. and the new york times reports that the corduroy fans prepare for the fabric's day of all days days. they picked the date that most looks like corduroy, the parallel ridges. they say that the grandest

appreciation of the corduroy club is sold out, but you can buy one of the celebratory things. including the corduroy honey badger which i am buying for a gift for maybe senator david vitter, the hooker guy. you can buy the numbers 11-11-11 made in corduroy which makes the idea to 11. and tomorrow is also nigel tufnel day, the guitar guy in "spinal tap." >> you can see that the numbers go to 11 across the board to 11-11-11. >> h and the amps up to ten. is that meaning it is louder? >> well, it is one louder, isn't it? >> and 11 is louder than 10. well, this november 11th is like every november 11th, veterans day which is a celebratory

holiday and not the same as memorial day a when we remember those who gave their lives for the country. veterans day is a day to honor those who served in the military and it is the day to clap and cheer and tip our hats for those who celebrate. and in particular if you are not a veteran, it is time to think about what to do for veterans day tomorrow. and your town might have a veterans day parade and small towns have them. you should go and you could thank somebody who served the country. call them up. write a note. knock on the door. reach out to a family who has a loved one overseas and offer to walk the dog or run an errand or ways to donate old cell phone for a soldier can call home, or make one of the tiny trees from wisconsin every year or write a letter of thank you, and join the v.a. and in pausing at 11:11 a.m. and stop and remember the troops in the privacy of your own head. there are link