tv [untitled] March 28, 2022 2:00pm-2:31pm MSK
2:00 pm
program hello is the meeting place on ntv the place where everything becomes clear? i'm andrey norkin . my colleague is ivan trushkin. we are working live . so, on sunday, the date of the next round of consultations between the russian and ukrainians was announced, and the delegations will hold these consultations on march 29-30, that is, on tuesday and wednesday, vladimir medinsky, who heads our delegation, the turkish side, spoke about this, then it was added that the meeting would be take place in istanbul in istanbul in my opinion, in such composition for the first time. if i remember correctly, another thing is that moscow already officially announced on monday that there will be no negotiations between putin and zelensky, because now it is counterproductive, but i think that uh, there is uh, the contribution and rather big contribution of the president of the united states biden , whose recently completed european tour turned out to be, well, without
2:01 pm
exaggeration, a scandalous slander, there are a huge amount of everything and it's true. i had to, and somehow rebut all this and reconfigure biden himself, including, but as we know the word is not a sparrow, you won’t catch a flight, what flew out of the president of the united states, let's listen. you interact with vladimir putin every day, see what he did with these people, what do you think of him? he's the butcher that's what i think, all biden's rhetoric in poland was in the spirit of the cold war, the american president again called putin a war criminal and said in plain text that he did not belong in the kremlin a dictator who wants to revive a long-dead the empire will never be able to achieve this free people. this will never be supported as free people refuse to live in a world where kings are darkness we
2:02 pm
strive for light for democracy for freedom of opportunity. this man can't stay in power in the mikhailovna category is still the thought of you and the generals and nato so the former commander of the allied joint force in europe wesley clark the other day scared of a potential russian nuclear strike on poland if putin really wants to contain. nato if he believes that he can destroy it, he must can use tactical nuclear weapons, where he will use them, perhaps not in ukraine, but somewhere in a crowded place in poland, clarke made this warning just before biden arrived in poland, where he spent 2 days, but as the press writes, the visit had to be interrupted ahead of schedule and return and to america , after russian missiles successfully hit military targets in lvov on saturday, the poles are confident that it was moscow's signal of personal health. are the rocket strikes on lviv signals that the visit of the american leader poland has been noticed by the kremlin for sure. yes, i do not
2:03 pm
undoubtedly take this as a signal from the kremlin, joe biden's visit to poland is important, as it demonstrates the unity of the north atlantic alliance, it shows the russians that nato is determined to protect the state of the members to defend poland. so about the protection of the members later, which means i said that these are the statements of the baidan. first there were clarifications from the press service of the white house, then there were clarifications from the state department. then he canoe also said a little differently, there is one interesting point. now, as for this passage, that this person should not be in power about putin when he and the american press writes here, you can probably believe them that this phrase was not in the text of the speech of the american president. biden spoke by prompter. and i put this phrase from myself and there, in
2:04 pm
general, somehow because of this there was a special inconvenience. it was necessary to somehow explain that they really understood him differently, like, uh, it was necessary to understand, andrey nikolaevich a. how should we understand, but the president of the united states even if he made a reservation there or there in some kind of courage, but this is one time. and this is not the first time, and on this trip it is generally three or four times. there's just one epithet more beautiful than another. so he does it consciously, for what? what do you think, well, we're talking about a direct confrontation between russia and the united states. well, it does not happen in a direct clash of military forces, but from the point of view of the united states, they do war against russia, as they call it, it is not so fundamental. the fact is that he declares what they want to hear from him, he came to poland poland is at the peak of russophobia. what is there to say? well , the war criminal will turn off the president of russia, that is, the person played in public, then he had to live a little in a kindergarten. what do you understand? now i'm going to scream some
2:05 pm
hurtful words there. you understand the hurtful words there. well , it's not even a matter of offense, because if you go to this level of swearing, well, we we have every reason to say that joe biden is an old senile. moreover, when a person begins to speak, i talked with kosygin there. and something else i was talking to him yesterday. true , when you hear about such things from the president, you understand the sensations, and he understands exactly where he is at what time, because here is a sense of reality and he is somehow sadly displaced. it's sad, but for us the situation is something. in general, in no way should any conclusions be drawn . uh, don't know if we're special or we really write off the fact that well, no. well, the experts did not get enough sleep should do in one we should not think, well, we are our senior leadership's diplomacy that here at this stage, some kind of compromise is possible. this is a very tough confrontation that the united states wants , the bands are constantly trying to make it even more dangerous , it must be assumed that a compromise in the near
2:06 pm
future is impossible to pay attention to. for us , the situation does not change. we must protect our interests because they are so frank. oh, thanks, in our country, any people disappear, even here, but if we move away this beautiful and generally convenient version that we are dealing with the old there, we don’t move this story away, it’s just convenient to write off everything then. i meet the version of viktorazavich. i don't know if it's true or not, that biden just utters a rumor that he usually doesn't utter. uh, it's some kind of closed briefing papers that they discuss the leadership of the white house among themselves. it breaks out of him, then in public what usually remains there closed doors. no, biden, intentionally sends signals to andrei vladimirovich correctly said that this is not the first time. yes. he says this, he says the same thing in different versions, signals can be sent in different ways. and here, in plain text, it was said that the signal should not remain. the signal is not the signal, and a very harsh signal for whom the signal is, firstly, a signal for, uh, allies, what
2:07 pm
is she? and outside of nato, this is also a signal for those countries, such as india, a number of other countries that, in general, have not chosen sides and remain for the moment moment. so to speak, neutral in this situation, the americans thus make it clear that this story is for them, firstly. they don’t intend to retreat, in no case will they continue to push, they intend to push russia, this is the first, and the second they make it clear that the situation for them is in how they see the world. it is black and white, that is, either e with them or freedom, and such harsh rhetoric. here it is the biden administration, the white house clarifies something all the time, but uh, they would leave this harsh signal without comment. they are each once they start talking. oh, they publish it back, what are we calling the people of russia blah blah blah the whole thing. here's the bottom line. the thing is, who is targeted by
2:08 pm
each signal, this is the signal that biden sends with his uh, tough, perhaps very tough statements. it's aimed at who i've been talking to, but here's what you call playing back, it 's aimed at slightly different points. after all, one way or another in some format. the negotiation process will take place. the americans are determined to push through their goals, but the negotiation process there will be some kind of conversations, yes, between washington and moscow they still take place and will take place, and in this sense they have to play back purely formally like this, to make it clear, no, they say, they do not intend to overthrow the government in russia, that is, because that otherwise there would be no negotiation process at all, by the way, and peskov said that each such statement narrows the possibilities for negotiations between moscow and washington, which is why this is such a subtle game of duration. and we now let's give you a listen to the ambassador of the united states of moscow, mr. salinov, so in general, if you listen to him like that, he goes against this general line of the party about the butcher there,
2:09 pm
he should not remain in power. no, he says, it means that i may not live at the moment. or maybe you will live, but relations between moscow and washington will improve. let's replenish. i am absolutely not able to predict the future, but i will make one prediction. yes, this is not a prediction. i just know that, after all, russians and americans will resume normal relations. maybe not this year, maybe not next, but it will happen. i believe it is important that the united states and russia continue to discuss the most basic security issues, including the terrible weapons of mass destruction that both countries have today in the current context, it is difficult to start these negotiations. but i hope and expect that eventually we will resume them for the benefit of all mankind. our predecessors led them during the cold war, the same line. to no small surprise many experts are also supported by jens stoltenberg, who is so much a norwegian accountant. the central bank did not go continues to remain. yes, even a year, at least the secretary general of nato, he also
2:10 pm
reflects on what could be the relationship of the alliance with moscow. let's listen to him too. in my opinion, it is still too early to say what our relationship with russia will be like in the future. they definitely won't stay. the same as before. we will not return to what could be called the former normality of the impossible. return to how our relationship has been before, but there is a need to maintain some engagement with russia on issues such as arms control, risk reduction and conflict resolution. igor vladimirovich turns out biden sets a certain bar quite high, but there is nowhere higher. putin should not govern russia , they then correct him. but nevertheless, there are some individual people of a lower rank who, in general, say that it is necessary to negotiate. some kind of negotiations are needed new normality there will be no normality, but it is necessary come to some new normal. these are two polar points. okay, so, well, first of all, no one, uh,
2:11 pm
a huge amount of the american establishment hopes to count on the fact that sanctions are gathering their role. in russia , there will be a coup d'etat and again, the liberals who came to power from the nineties. of course, they will build other relations with america, little they understand about russia in general. we have already talked about this on this network many times, then in any case among the american hawks there are also hawks and hawks. now we understand that democrats are republicans by and large, there are other hawks, but, nevertheless, different tactics are present, and when and then the senator only corrects his president, well, half-heartedly, half-seriously saying that, well, you need to act according to the scenario . yes, that is, do not lag behind - do not retreat. step away from paper. yes, that is, this suggests that, of course, of course, he expresses his point of view or tried to express his point of view, but the speechwriters tried to put him in his charter to a different point vision. a little more so calm, so we see, firstly, two two two two american tactics, one such a more affectionate
2:12 pm
policeman, and the other a tough policeman, and on the other hand. still, this is the hope that these stations will succeed in changing the power of russia and, of course, again with the power. this is for an appeal to those who have fled or have not yet fled. take putin and we will agree with you, we will agree. yes, i continue. in general, this idea , including, of course, biden, addressed directly to the russian people. he said exactly that. here are the russian people. you, we are not your enemies , you are ours, they are the russian people, you have a dollar for 200 rubles. order rules looks at the courses thinks, well, grandfather is something, and you already know, yes, the fbi instructed to find the person who sold the bide dollar feat, and it's very convenient to change it, but then they say to change the shepherd. yes, they say that the chubais already have options. yes , listen, well, the name of the bideno is from powerlessness, in fact, but from powerlessness, and i now agree with victor about black and white. for them, now
2:13 pm
for the entire western world there is black and white, and calling names is a simplification, listen, well, nobody needs it and it’s not their interests to tell the story of the russian empire of kievan rus of the soviet union in order to, well, somehow more fully cover relationship history. yes , there is no ukraine and russia, here you have to call names. this is a simplification and should be adopted. and why in the sense of grandfather or like a and, by the way, it seems to me that once many, many years ago there was one film that then it was found to be fake and glued together from many pieces. well, there were very bright epithets, there george is a fucking cowboy. yes, that is, we somehow get, yes, weapons. blimey. i think. yes, of course, i offer you. why once again dmitrievich peskov, and not necessarily a lot of people in russian politics, then i think a lot of
2:14 pm
people is one story, and people who govern why this is important, because they work with emotions. we have problems with emotions of the electorate, we do not convey our truth to them, they do not understand ours position. we cannot explain to them about prince vladimir, and certain restrictions on the part of roskomnadzor are my emotions. we cannot verbally understand and spoil such a channel of communication if such a channel of communication appears, of course, a fantasy, but nevertheless it appears. and after that we will begin to understand. i think listen to us, if it is important for us to be understood by ordinary ordinary europeans americans. yes , they will begin to understand us, we need to talk to people. and when you say so, in a tie, jacket broadcasts something very long in detail. nobody will be for you aleksey genovich, kuzkina suggests. that's all and all urgent, but they work with it, they succeed, why do we
2:15 pm
reject it? so? well, why let's alexander yuryevich, i won't tell a joke about two tankers again. either in warsaw, or on khreshchatyk , or in low or rural fields, what the baidan is doing, it is absolutely conscious that this should not be imagined by the razmatiks. in this case, it's verified. it definitely works for different audience, knowing that there is his team, while knowing that if he or and his team are talking, multidirectional vectors. he perfectly understands what headlines will be tomorrow in the newspapers in poland , while others in poland will not notice the white house comment that he didn’t mean it, but we will say, here, he didn’t mean it, because they understand perfectly. we are not ready to live out the situation and break off relations. they stepped on very thin ice, they know about it and they are afraid of stolten stoltenberg 100%. they knocked. we are afraid he is coming and how they are already afraid for
2:16 pm
life. he is afraid of not surviving in the central bank on the red line, and all these speeches can lead to completely different reactions on our part. and in general, all this together. this is one of the two. one of the two main directions of the us strike against russia. the first is the economics of sanctions, the second is the absorption. these are information-psychological operations, and they, by the way, are the best specialists in the world today. eh, everything. this is verified, each information stuffing is designed for audience. where everything will go, they even predict reactions, and by the way, for the sake of parallel, one of the most successful units of the ukrainian so -called army of the former ukraine, and here, too, chick is also informational. i'm trying feverishly now to succumb to provocations to pick up some epithets. well, well, i understand that i, well, i’ll probably be able to pick up something, but then it will still be impossible to translate it into a foreign language, and the
2:17 pm
imagery, which therefore, we won’t be able to add emotion in this way, well, about special operations, i don’t know, but although i confirm that when on some foreign media, let’s say , they are invited to discuss ukraine, then, from the ukrainian side, as a rule, it’s beautiful from beautiful english girls whom i don’t know, that is, these are not some . these are the acquaintances of the police, because of this. i, on the contrary, do not get upset, i just say that, well, it means that people work, because i remember, i still tracked epochs in epochs. maidan western media also appeared there, as if maidan activists were there with perfect english language on one side sit beautiful girls with english and on the other side. yes, with english they will probably choose the girl. well, that's it, if you watch without sound, that's the point. if we talk about the parameters, you understand, we, unfortunately, have been there for the last months and years. we live in such an atmosphere, and mutual uh, means insults on the international line, that when we
2:18 pm
see a statement is quite normal. not but a typical for a diplomat statement by the american ambassador of such a restrained optimistic or statement, stoltenberg responsible we are surprised. wow, man does his job man works fine. actually. he would have trained as a diplomat. he says diplomatically in this problem that we already perceive normality as something like a discovery of heroism and about biden's speech. i listened to it carefully in its entirety. here. uh, in my opinion, this is one of the most emotional, such charged and pathos speeches that he made, at least as president, and there are many of them to hear these speeches. but it's kind of, well, that is, it is perceived, beautifully interesting, but that's the problem, because here i agree with my colleagues. by the way, in the west, too, these are celebrated by many. including such a public intellectual, neil ferguson, who can hardly be accused of sympathizing with russia, but he wrote a column in bloomberge, where i said that, uh, such an approach to the ukrainian crisis, when you, on the one hand, say what are you you want, and a ceasefire is right there, but at the same time you are pushing ukraine and saying that
2:19 pm
you will succeed. we will supply you with weapons now. win, including militarily. this, of course, leads to a prolongation of the conflict and to the question of an ambassador, to the question of a message to the british intellectuals. i understand what kind of alifergin should i talk about today? he wrote many different books, but world history yes yes yes yes yes yes yes and here is the last moment about the ambassadors, as they are sent by a sensible person to the layer of the smoker. here i am carefully with uh, i read on the blocked twitter a of the former ambassador of the united states in michael's russia is small, but it's a pleasure and, accordingly, recently, uh, gave an interview or somehow commented saying that in ukraine, and russia will receive for itself, but in afghanistan, but the problem is, if we, of course, don't want anyone in afghanistan to have this on our border, but if we turn it over, it’s like a table and look from the side of the ukrainians. do ukrainians really want to see their country as afghanistan, which has been here for decades, it was hard for me to understand, even in previous years. just when i looked at the presidential elections before ukraine
2:20 pm
even then about uh, how to say public? and the intellectual yes, british, well, not called intellectuals, well, obviously intellectuals, but because only such people can work in the main english-language print organ, and the global times is what the main chinese newspaper in english is, here's what they write about the americans and nato well, the us and nato instead of taking practical steps to end the conflict. they escalate contradictions and aggravate confrontation, creating obstacles for negotiations between moscow and kiev. give me a little more detail. the russian-ukrainian conflict is the result of an escalating conflict between the us and russia, and the key to solving the problem lies in the hands of the us if washington really wants the hard days of the ukrainian people not to continue, why has it chosen to coordinate with europe to send weapons to ukraine more and more europeans , are aware that the blind shipment of weapons to ukraine leads
2:21 pm
in the opposite direction of the security goals they are pursuing, in addition to the result long-term extreme sanctions should be that the us will get rich in europe will have to pay the bills, and ukraine will bleed. washington cannot hide these petty ideas. well, here it is written that more and more europeans are realizing, and so years igor sergeevich i think that the europeans perfectly understand what is happening, but here they will not be able to play their game. speaking of what was said here from what biden said and all the following, there are simply a few practical things, which we must take into account the first thing that the united states, led by the west, has taken a course on the contrary, the elimination of russia, led by the united states, is understandable. yes. it was at the head of the united states that they headed for the liquidation of russia, the second thing they again continue to
2:22 pm
cherish on clothes is that it can be done from the inside, hence his appeal to the people that the whole problem is in putin and not aside as a whole. we have already gone through this when we said that a bad autocracy is a good people. remove autocracy and all problems will disappear february 17th and what did we have after that then there was bad communism. remove the communists, and everything will be fine. in the ninety-first they did it, that is, they succeeded twice, and therefore they think that they will succeed the third time. and here again, the chinese are absolutely right when they say that what is happening in ukraine is only one of the theaters of military operations. let the hybrid war between the west and russia here, in no case, need to be deceived that it is possible to find some kind of compromise, to explain something to someone, to reach out to something consciousness. putin not so long ago
2:23 pm
well and clearly said that now we are talking about the end of the 500-year domination of western civilization over the world. who did not allow western civilization to establish power over the whole world twice. russia who gave western civilization almost all power over the world russia in the ninety- first year of their capitulations, respectively, now for the west the most important danger is not china is now standing on the sidelines smoking nervously and watching something happen between us and the americans. if we stand now, then about no western a civilization that owns the whole world of speech cannot be now the question is to be or not to be both for them and for us. that's what biden and everyone else is talking about, just a tactician, how to do it, and we need to understand, this is what lies on the scales? nikolaevich well, pay attention
2:24 pm
that a month has already passed. and so far no serious progress towards changes in the overall security situation in the world is the reason for this misunderstanding that on the part of people in russia who make decisions about what they think, the west and in the west what they think is what is happening in russia well, the idea has just been voiced that the collective west wants the collapse of russia only some inadequate people in the collective west may want the collapse of the world's largest nuclear power plant. ah, powers. the biggest powers did not want to return. i believe that no, and for them, and for them, it was a serious danger, and the fact that in the ninety-first year nothing worse happened that could happen, there is no need to repeat it, this is the second time and those who are responsible for national security, who took the flow crashed listen to the soviet union, even if i never
2:25 pm
finish telling you. they said that the west did not seek, the soviet union read a national security doctor or not? if you haven’t read it, then you have n’t read it again, i repeat to you that surely there are inadequate people who really want to consider inadequate people force such documents that now quote documents did not designate cities of the soviet union as targets for nuclear strikes, these are also real documents which even the americans now do not hide. we have there were also corresponding schemes. everyone counted on a nuclear war. we have already served. yes, that's why, by the way, they remembered. yes, i looked, you didn’t mean it to me, they sent some kind of hand. what you sent
2:26 pm
was talking about the fact that in the soviet union there was a project that had already been brought to the testing stage, when in the event of the destruction of the soviet leadership, i simplify it very simply, it means that a command is given, such a special rocket flies over the territory of the ussr, sends all sorts of signals there and automatically everything takes off and flies with us then the dispute here was due to the fact that you said that the soviet leadership, and counted on the fact that it will survive in all of this. don't repeat. us is wrong. it is not right. well, of course it's wrong. yes, so if a month has passed, and uh, we see a statement from the united states embassy that someday relations will normalize. this means that this statement can be deleted in only two ways, or it will really normalize. this is inevitable, or
2:27 pm
no one will be able to verify this statement, because there really will be a nuclear war. here that is, for a month no one sat down at the negotiating table, where negotiations, of course, were held by president putin, as from your point of view. we don't understand. eh, west. but explain to me what the west does not understand us. i have already said many times that there were proposals. there were russia to join nato and that they did not accept their proposals. it is not true. no, it wasn't going to. wait. i’m really like this, i would say from the russian side it was understood in the west they didn’t understand they weren’t going to they weren’t going to understood, because they do not understand what is real, because it is really impossible for the largest not to perceive such that, but as a bloc that, in order to fight on our part, can seriously consider accepting our country. that was the
2:28 pm
fucking soviet union. there was no by the time vladimir putin came in the ninety-first year, it should have dissolved itself, since it ceased to exist, but the peace-loving bloc continued to move towards our nikolai well, at the beginning, this topic began to discuss the 2000s, the initiative. strictly speaking, putin and guessed. after we put up against the bombing of yugoslavia after the well-known situation at the airport neurodrome. all of this could be done, a prishtina. yes, we just need to take a break, and then let's move on to my favorite topic of the last days, gas for rubles. here it is. my name is oleg. i'm an alcoholic so i've been driving through life no bandits.
2:29 pm
then call the fighters as a loader. we try to pack it, then at the construction site. now i'm teaching carpentry to children, are you the son of a general so are you sure this is your sister tatyana vladimirovna khmelny? it's tanya, you're to blame. it is necessary that you cut off his oxygen through your channels, and do not hide much forever. that's not my fault. today i have a warrant. i've been ordered to take you to queue 00 on the ntv premiere on friday at 21:00.
2:30 pm
i'm willing to spend days and nights on a recipe for truffle caramel ice cream, but you know what i'm not ready to put my business on pause, get free service for 6 months and 15% on the opening bank account balance when hemorrhoids are inconvenient sitting is uncomfortable to drive. but it is convenient to treat hemorrhoids when one complex remedy can help relieve pain, itching and burning. hepatrombin d. a convenient treatment for an uncomfortable disease.
12 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
NTVUploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1858874842)