norms and thus the language quickly lives , evolves and changes with how our culture is changing with how our consciousness is changing alekseevich now wait. well, for automatic processing of the language, the rules are certainly needed. there they are. what an amazing role they play, because, to be honest, those who are engaged in automatic language processing, as a rule, are not very well versed in how the language works, i constantly remember as a joke that those who are the authors of breakthrough technologies for understanding the english language existence, in general there is morphology, there are some prefixes in words. well, for the last time. they noticed in 2017. before that, they did not notice for a long time, they completely ignored them, and so they are fundamentally about them. here are the experts in the field of artificial intelligence automatic language processing. they set tasks in a fundamentally different way. they are building magnificent systems. i'm calling the bank. and the robot hears me, understands and answers me. if you're lucky, what you need is not always, but from the individual. well, you can see how he's progressing. nobody

when this robot was created. that's when the basic technologies for it were created, did not teach the machine the rules of the russian language, but here we are, for example, with colleagues at the institute of artificial intelligence. we are engaged in what we look at, and the machine learned what rules itself in an amazing way, in an amazing way, it turns out that such basic things for us as the subject and the predicate did not occur to anyone in the car to tell what they are, but if look at how she behaves. what abstractions does she calculate for herself in order to say something further, for some reason. here, too, there are concepts of parts of speech. i have reasoning about what the proposal is consistent with. should the verb be similar, like the subject or the apple that the cat ate, here the cat ate, and the apple of the neuter gender is the verb of the feminine anyway and these are the patterns that arise on their own. it seems to me, well, another evidence that hmm we are well we are, of course there is, we are picking the language. we come up with some rules and live by them ourselves, but these rules are not the result of the fact that we

invented, but a consequence of how the language is arranged in itself. he can't fundamentally. he cannot function without them. they don't go anywhere, right? this is how anton alekseevich turns out and said that the rules are the language, but look, i understand correctly that if the rules of the russian language are so more complicated, and not still complicated, which i think, even there at the institute and for a lot years it is impossible to learn them, i understand correctly what the process of our thinking means. and that's all that is connected with the russian. here it is so diverse and complex, that it is impossible for the whole world to understand us. this was a very philosophical question to whom now. it seems to me that it’s time to intervene, because we are talking about what language we are talking about, we are talking about the same rules that we have in mind, because something that anton alekseevich spoke about very well, he is absolutely right. this internal rule of the language is the rule of the language, as a system that is mobile, has a mobile structure

that can change, and so on. and when the language already produces speech, and we begin to speak, using language. and this is where other rules come into play. why do we need rules at all so that we a can express our thoughts and understand each other with the least effort. here they are , of course, already being fixed. here's how she got divorced. our speech appeared two definitions of the norm, the first is what is used. eh, it's ubiquitous and not perceived as a mistake. and the second definition is that. he says most of the educated people. today, this is such a meaning, when linguists are already looking at fixing the rules, they, uh, actually talking and watching people talk, but, of course, we are often reproached for the fact that the rules are lagging behind. here is a fixation of these, it seems to me the rules. yes, this is also a very serious question, so and about the neural network, here is the neural network. we are very used to relying on it, and

now our brain is working for about nine, and that's it, that's why on victory day our journalists treat veterinarians with buckwheat from the camp kitchen , celebrate the victory over the polish introverts on november 4, and write about incest with the british destroyer in the black sea. honestly i'm not lying, a rich fantasy. yes you people, it's just an exclusive confused placebo. it's even good with loved ones. you can in defense, right? yes, yes, advertising, probably tv from the cultural heritage of russia on ntv, we just admire what

is necessary for life in the next 10 years, the rules of the russian language will cancel one of the problems of the russian language, our expert professor kapustin argues the main problem of the modern russian language is a relative reduction vocabulary. well, for example, in the 20th century, the lexical stock of the russian language practically did not changed, as it was 150.000 so 150.000 remained

for the example in english during the same time there was an increase in vocabulary, it was also 150.000, but it became 750. what a nightmare olga igorevna and she turns out well, that is, our speech is getting poorer, the rules for this cannot be fixed keep up with the language all the time. so maybe then god is with them really with these rules. and i'll also put things in order a little, because now it was all about vocabulary. they are about e grammatical e, rules and selection rules. here are the rules for choosing words. yes, because you need to know where which one is used often, they differ only in shades of meaning, as well. but eh. yes , we are very scolded for the fact that we are lagging behind and somehow we are not codifying, but and uh, now i have conceived a terrible thing. katya get ready. while they were already cooking. now i'm even going to go to the blackboard. you are dealt with by four. uh,

the fact is that there are many words that have just appeared in our everyday life. so how do you write? uh, it would be better, of course, the other way around, but, well, okay. i am i'll sway a little so you can be seen better youtube youtube good by the way, yes, i'm talking about this all the time, but in this i'm thinking about writing, how i write, write, i try to write, write english as much as possible in russian. well, i don’t know, because i’m writing now. what are we youtube huh? youtube youtube well yes, i you youtube through yes probably through b bravo to british english youtube is an american pronunciation. so says three -quarters of the population, including professionals. what the national corpus of the russian language tells us youtube this is perhaps something that is not necessary, but

now we will watch the hood, it will be and now we are migrating towards youtube because most educated people say so. and now i will write you three words. kat they are very funny this is how can, eh? body belt and the pass now i will ask you to decline. but when we have it in the plural, here, we have a building building building building one number and different buildings. so i know what many say, and we have too. yes, the size, it turns out that pumping the body, well building, yes, if it is one, but if you are all friends , let's pump it, that's how it's the other way around, if people have a search for beautiful pieces

of clothing in the buildings of the building, if you have a lot of them in your collection. this is what this is mine this is mine. come on, let's work it out, but i don't pretend to sort out a lot of belts in my wardrobe, but these are my belts the same way, and the time zones are again the opposite. i got stuck somewhere. i think it's the norm. this is about to change. e at work. we all determined a pass and we all have a lot, and everyone is presented. yes everything already prompted. yes, everyone presents a pass very, in short, the meaning is that and if we have white spots in the text, then this is already a pass. you see that grammatically different meanings are distinguished. everything is terrible. why is oleg alekseevich coming back and what kind of technologies then should be developed in order for people to write and speak and

competently crem, and that's all modern technologies. indeed, they adapt to people in many ways and it’s not that they are engaged in such directly tough police control and i don’t know who they don’t report about when that i'm wrong, but in general, probably in the middle of modern conversational artificial intelligence, just the very one of that person lies. the same program that is called there used to be called t9, which adds words. it turned out to be very convenient. if we suddenly know how to understand very well, and what is needed next or what? there it is necessary to write in a hole in the place of a hole in the text? now, if we solve this problem, then it is very convenient to remake it into most other applied problems, whether it is an offensive classification a sentence or not offensive, then the search for mentions of some geographical places of people or just something interesting in the framework of the conversation, as soon as we better or even better learn how to solve the problem of automatically completing the text. we automatically advance in most of the tasks

in general that we face as a conversational artificial intelligence, but the only thing. we seem to be all the same with grammar. well, you can, of course, grumble here and still say from your feet that this is all wrong, but we seem to be grammar is still manageable. well, probably , we still know how to do it well, and when it comes to subtle meanings about what meaning is contained in the sheet of the text, it’s easy enough to understand what the sentences are about, but it can be very difficult to understand what the whole text is about, although it would seem that it is from sentences , of course. and now, as if now, well, from a practical point of view, they will develop anyway, these were added, added, added the texts that we have on phones, but really a big challenge. it's to learn understand large texts. and about how to correctly answer. i don’t even say to answer complex books at all, they don’t read them, and therefore they ca n’t understand us, the text suggests itself soon or for people, that artificial intelligence, that our dear living wonderful philologists. they are trying to catch those changes in the rules, and which are

developed in a living language. a or catching er, well, in a sense, e even impose these new rules. and to us well, those who use gadgets or some programs, despite the fact that there are rules and unshakable, because the same artificial intelligence has a program that is entirely built on the rules of the language, primarily on grammatical rules there and differentiate meanings, and at this level, that is, uh, i apologize for such a uh such a departure into history, but one of the first programs and lisa - this is the seventies of the last century. she built a dialogue with a person, based precisely on semantic. about sense more than that, specialized. uh, the dialogue of the psychoanalyst doctor with the patient built this dialogue

based on grammatical rules primarily no, on the other hand. i understand. technology is advancing and helping us, perhaps even to comply with the rules. no-no-no, that's not even the point, but i, for example, are those same nine or are there these auto-prompts? i would call it evil, because yes t9 auto hints. what it is now it may be evil, but t9 and the auto- podska a little more, when it finishes, when it becomes a little better, it will help the language not blur the language norms, because what is happening now 30 years ago people saw there are much fewer errors both in written texts and in oral texts, if 30 years ago people saw books written by literate people. people saw the announcer's speech, but now people are counting from the network and listening to podcasts, and there are a huge number of speech errors that lead to the fixation of errors, blurring of the t9 norm, can suggest

a codified correctly option, as if a little bit of a push. unobtrusively, persuading people to use the right options for their look at their children. they stop teaching. as needed because they will automatically insert the correct word when writing a text message and then, when we remove the phone with its auto prompt, the child cannot write anything at all once they see this word on the eighteenth, they will remember it. good. wait, they will tell you, because you will tell me to invite a deer for an interview, for example, by thirteen o'clock and be surprised that he did not come, although his name was? oleg is not a deer. he just took offense or write ads. don't park your car here, because grandfather is here regularly. drops every 15 minutes roofs, i mean, again such ice, and in the total dictation in the text guzee or yakhina and where she was powerful. eh, mighty church with graceful lancet windows on the square. suddenly, a mighty sprat with meeting windows appeared and

a person follows t9, it’s just that his brain is already working. by t9, t9 selects the most frequent word in similar contexts, and the person no longer thinks about the meaning, so i still have a big question. on the other hand, where did he once say that people go crazy from t9 e. eh, on the other hand. trust me, autocorrect is going crazy too. my child texts me. dad and i went to the theatre. well, of course, he writes to the theater, as he hears and writes. he says autocorrect went crazy . she could not understand what to offer him even to offer in response to this theater could not come up with. so, then i have a question for our guests , an optimistic skeptic of the rules of the russian language. they are essentially the same laws. and if punishment inevitably follows for breaking the law, so we can, yes, yes, yes, so it can also be introduced. i dont know

some kind of punishment for violating the rules of the russian language, fines or jail time. and then everyone will write and speak correctly, the same horror. no, of course you don't have to do that. why you can, well, firstly, it seems to me that after all, the rules are not laws, but patterns that we have fixed. still, these are two completely different words. and secondly, the fact that someone is starting to write in a new way, what i am writing to a friend, that i just came home, got carried away under the plaza. turn on and turn on yourself tv series on youtube and the fact that t9 tells me that it’s not on youtube but on youtube, this is actually not evidence that our language has become impoverished or what? with us, i started, he says, cicism to use it. what, on the contrary, is there beauty in this that we took youtube . first of all, we noticed that he still did not go. and youtube probably, and they also said that judging by the fact that there is a predecessor, a serial, he will be a wonderful youtuber and does not deserve

condemnation at all. well, i don’t know, you have an offer, maybe there are no fines to imprison everyone unconditionally. no if to put everyone who is only at their desks with a pen together with notebooks, at best, in fact. you are talking about laws. we have a law on the russian language, as a state language, the media are obliged to comply with it and advertisers are obliged to comply, and to the first, here are all those who write upon arrival upon arrival at the end of negotiations. i would have planted and asked to write 100 times as required by the norm. i think people would remember and no longer broadcast this mistake. they are also the bearers of literary norms. now in a much larger degrees than writers. uh, of course, uh, and the law on the russian language. e. quite right. thank you very much for reminding about it, which concern primarily language professionals, that is, those who not only speak, e with their immediate environment, but speak publicly, and nurture a sense of language in everyone else

. o was invented in the fourth. the last century and there were

many copies in the broken about how it would work, let's go break the spear and watch ads. so you must follow this path. delphic games set their goals by combining creative youth, a good start in a career weekend world scene. so many emotions can not be found anywhere else. this is a unique experience. diversity. statistical experience communication experience april, 21 youth delphic games russia

marie krimbrery incredible, stunning leopard marie krimbrery mask who will be the next favorite game? guess the mask continues, everyone already understands, who is the grandmother, natasha is delighted. he is the man of my dreams, the new season. the science and us program is on air, a program about how science will change our lives in the next 10 years, dear guest optimistic in your opinion. what is the probability that in 10 years the rules of the russian language will still be canceled, who is ready to predict to make a

zero percent probability that all the rules will be forgotten in general, and we will write as we want to speak, as we want it is an exclusively different matter that we will be like that anyway do, but the rules will exist so that we understand each other. we have already shown that sometimes this happens. we need a big thank you now, we find ourselves in a world in which, after all, machines provide, firstly a lot of attention to how we use language and a lot of influence on how we speak, frankly they're everywhere. and now, they are even already watching how we write, so i suspect that the changes are even fundamental. that's it. in what we consider the rules and how they work, most likely will happen and will happen in these very next few years, so i think that, well, what is, as an unshakable system, an unshakable system, will definitely be canceled, of course, that some fundamental things. nowhere will be gone, but the changes will take place, and they will be

very noticeable. i think it's some beautiful one. there must be a chance of that. well let it be 85%. 85% thank you very much. i think, after all, that from zero, but who will cancel them? they ruled personally zero percent. thank you very much, here, but they will change from one hundred percent zero to 0%. thanks a lot. of course, the rules, as such, we talked about it the whole program, and cancel. uh, you can't, in principle, uh, but what will change are the specific rules. eh, here it is announced in our country of the decade of science and technology. it is quite possible that in these 10 years there will be a new reform of the language based on the principle of simplification. simplify spelling. and the simplification of uh, grammar,

and this will be uh, the meaning is not only such a more flexible adaptation to what is now, but it’s quite possible that this could become a tool in the further promotion of the russian language around the world, but the rules, as it were so it is, so it will not be canceled zero percent will change. uh-huh they have changed, but will always be so percent. thank you very much, thank you. god with a probability of only two one there is 25 hundredths of a percent. the rules of the russian language will be canceled no, canceled the russian language. however, let there be many new borrowings. yes, and even youtube but do not simplify the main ones. what really scares me? here is a simplification of the language of its impoverishment. it's terrible, of course, there will be new rules. but most importantly, don't say goodbye. the main thing is that we do not forget that our language. what and mighty

it was a science program and a program about how science will change, including our life with you the next 10 years, and look at us, learn, see you in a week, for now, in russian.

we can't stop, we can't get out.

can you give me a pair of shoes ? bring be a friend

bring the phone. bring a mobile phone. further they took the collector wounded in the shoulder.

who's here cover your head you'll catch a cold. everything is. the crime is covered well, you see, how good it is, a short case, it turned out, maybe, in general, quit your job, it's a killer's button. who is the criminal, judging by the holes, this is very sad. what is there half the country? here same without expertise? it is clear that, well , it is put on, like the last loshara. well done, he caught himself by two buttons. didn't do it.

i have important information. you are an unknown well-wisher. so what, i want to talk about the robbery, but i will only speak with a professional. lucky you. it's me. i can tell you where the evidence is hidden. look in the trash can.

strangely, they are categorically forbidden to stop, let alone get out of the car. it is strange that private collectors was driving, not a driver. why is it strange that your flea is not a damn thing not found. you can relax, i already have all the evidence.