then zhirinovsky died on the air. this was announced today by the chairman of the state duma , vyacheslav volodin. you know, i knew vladimir volfovich personally, but i think that every russian citizen. uh, we can say that he also knew zhirinovsky because he did not leave anyone indifferent in my humble opinion. it certainly was the brightest politician. e in our country, and throughout the entire duration of his political career. many admired him, his statement and actions amused someone, on the contrary outraged, and i must say that zhirinovsky really had something to criticize, and on the case, but that's what he could not be presented, probably never. this is that he was engaged in some kind of two-handedness and not consistently enough. defending the interests of our country is the best proof of that, the sabbath that now reigns in the ukrainian so-called media over the death of vladimir zhirinovsky, well, you know

the stories, will certainly put everything in its place. and although one more moment is completely unique for perhaps not a single russian politician possessed zhirinovsky. eh, with such a gift of foresight, he predicted what is happening in ukraine many, many years ago, including saying that crimea would return to the russian federation , it’s a pity that now, in these conditions, we don’t have such a fiery tribune, who really in the literal sense of the word could live by the verb our enemies and provocateurs, with whom we are dealing. well, let's talk about a provocation, then let's move on, and i called the events in bucha a provocation our foreign minister. sergei lavrov he said that the provocation was committed at the moment when the russian-ukrainian. negotiations i quote sergeevich for the dawning light. well, you remember, yes, in istanbul, ukrainians for the first time set out their obligations on paper, in particular, they

were ready to abandon their nuclear status from nuclear weapons from uh. it means agreeing to a non-bloc status to ban, and conducting military exercises without the permission of the guarantor countries, including russia, and so on and so forth. well, here's how as soon as these photographs appeared, the ukrainian negotiators immediately stopped. any kind of forward movement. and? well, and international reactions too. in general, it is quite obvious that the security council, like you, you remember, twice refused to meet on our initiative regarding the storm. as soon as the ukrainian application was received. held the meeting right there. well, let's actually take a look. yes, why? because the uk is currently chairing it, so there are difficulties. let's. we will start the meeting of the security council with this. the meeting of the security council began with a call to the secretary general, antonio guteres, to conduct an independent investigation into the events in bucha. the

president of the european commission, ursula fonderlein, spoke to her in a similar way, then, via video link, with a long accusatory speech against the russian military , the president of ukraine zelensky delivered a tough ultimatum to the un security council who are you? can you have two ways either to eliminate russia as a source of war, so that russia does not block the decision related to its own aggression, and then we will do everything to establish a quieter world, the second the option to eliminate yourself, if, apart from talking, you are not capable of anything, then there is no other option left. our permanent representative vasily nebenzya pointed out the obvious inconsistencies in the fake about the storm, explaining that this story is being promoted to demonize russia and did not rule out new provocations from the ukrainian security forces. then he directly turned to zelensky, we leave it on your conscience without evidentiary needles about blaming e against the russian military,

which is not supported by any evidence eyewitnesses. we have hundreds, if not thousands, not thousands of video testimonies of people who are ready to testify to the cruelty of ukrainian nationalists. china demanded that all accusations against the russian military on the events be confirmed by facts, and the british representatives who chair the security council promised. henceforth. no, the country is helping the country to hold council meetings, the statement was made after she twice refused russia in austria on the butch, but the us ambassador reacted to zelensky's ultimatum simply wounding russia security councils the security council is the result of the creation of the united nations after the second world war. they are members of the security council. their

security council we can make their presence in this body very uncomfortable. and we have already done it. let me quote again. uh, mr. zelensky, this is what he addresses to the security council, if you are not capable of anything other than talking, then maksim anatolyevich and what the security council is capable of besides talking, we can still count on for some adequate investigation of what happened near kiev, we don't, i think, because there, but two against 13. if china is on our side, then it's not a fact. i think that one against thirteen, russia, and that is, the call, including mrs. funderlein, who is clearly not for us, and we should not somehow consider with hope. well actually the chinese position. it is clear that an examination is always necessary, if someone will conduct it. the head of our military has an internal conviction that they are right, then

one should be afraid of no investigations, but it is also understandable, obviously, these should not be those countries that the united nations can somehow contribute to. at least the beginning of preparations for conducting there, purely theoretically, if among those who will conduct the investigation on the spot, there are chinese, indians, there are conditional brazilians. i think this will not cause, and the kazakhs will not cause an objection from the russian federation canadians, you understand, now wait, there anton valeryevich immediately had an important question. yes question. and who exactly are those investigators, firstly, the judges, who is the key question already? actually the first century. and who are the prosecutor's investigators? the fact is that even the presence of the

chinese and all the others there does not guarantee that the investigation will be correct, not because there is something somehow chinese or kazakhstan. yes, no, because they are something bad, but because it is extremely difficult to investigate the territory is under the control of kiev, respectively, they are there they will find anyone, who will tell anything, which means that bodies can be any anywhere, and here i don’t understand at all how to investigate this as a whole. and, of course, there should be russian thoughts on this topic in general. and we have no other way. of course, we should also speak to them first of all, demand this investigation, but make sure that at least our representatives also appear. you can no, no, if this is some kind of mandate will be jointly under the guarantee. you can bring some example, when an investigation, really such an international one, established that the one about whom they were shouting at the beginning is not really to blame, but that side that was

shouting is to blame. i just can't imagine even in history. here is the security council to execute, when when it really turned out that they were different, but when they collectively investigated the collective court was coached by the latter. after that, i read i can't remember, everything was already there, i see. because i return to the question. and who are the investigators, who is to investigate? well, look, nuremberg is really an exception, what i can tell you now is, of course, not the results of an investigation. it just takes some time. uh-huh and the people once who made the decisions of the western side. yes, they suddenly talk about what actually happened, we can remember a lot of examples of javier salahu. we can remember tony blair, who was the first to say that there were no chemical weapons of mass destruction in iraq; we can remember carla ponti, who was the general the prosecutor for yugoslavia, who later wrote about the fact that trafficking in human organs was indeed and completely a proposal, and on the

american side that this case would be referred to the international criminal court. this uselessness is absolutely true, that's the point, but the problem is that everyone understands perfectly well that such a transfer resolution is made by the international court of justice of russia, it's all flown, so this is an impasse when you need to create some kind of separate, if we really want investigate, because we again have andrey vladimirovich, we again have an example of how this international criminal court works. this same court worked in relation to the crimes of the serbs in relation. to correctly i say everything in other mechanisms. no, that's all. so you need to either come up with them, or even abandon this more or less objective system. the north to the west have already blamed the military conflict for these war crimes. it continues to imagine that in the course of a military conflict, when significant

part of the countries, but already in essence. uh, the opinion about what happened there was expressed and it is against russia, yes, that is, the accused country, the accused is russia to imagine that these countries will refuse to go to the temple as part of any investigation in any format during the military conflict from these accusations. yeah, it just can't be like that, it won't be like that. come on let's say it directly, so there will be no investigation now that can be conducted in an international format. right now, on which all parties will agree, it won’t come to such a result, where with russia with him this accusation is the point. because then just then understand here, either one or the other, or russia is to blame, or , accordingly, a monstrous provocation. it was ukraine , if we refuse to accuse russia, this means that in relation to ukraine, all support programs, all cooperation programs, should be curtailed. all military support and

more, but they certainly won't go in between . actually. what are those? well, here are those the bodies that were, and they had been lying there for several weeks, which was recorded from satellites. they were not killed, targeted by the russian military. they died as a result of the resettlement on this street, respectively, these were not the military then. forgive na vera those photos that were published by the new york times, were not there yesterday. that 's just why the story with white huskies, and where there is syria, was then completely disowned, but nothing has changed, and white huskies even became a bunch of some kind and ukrainians shot everyone. after they entered and laid down the bodies. here we are now standing on this one in vegas maksim anatolyevich , i’m standing on this version, i’ll explain to you why, because a day before this whole story with gucci was published with photographs of the bodies, the national police of ukraine published a video of how it enters the city of buchu, how calmly her these national guardsmen us

policemen walk the streets, the city of bucha i have already repeated. this i will repeat the statement of the moscow sleeping districts. this is a very small area. don't find those bodies there for the time who these tell us. it was impossible to walk there, moreover , there were still residents who would instantly show us to these policemen what was happening, but a day passed us, the police published an absolutely peaceful video. and then they brought it there. after that, there was a statement . also that there will now be conception to you. now let me give you just a few examples. why no investigation in this regard? it seems to me that they will not help, because i can still understand when they pay attention to the fury and do not pay attention to the atrocities in regarding our e soldiers, well, just refuse these commercials a second to help. what might help . and if this is falsified data from a satellite, then after that, what date did they set there, the tenth of march, after that, uh,

russian representatives of the russian military show footage taken, for example, on march 15, when bucha was sold. this street, there are no villages, so they say that this will be proof, which is in reality until february 24th. when there were still illusions that these people were interested in reading the fourth of february violinists, when and so on, i will now give you examples of sounds. it is possible for civilians, citizens of russia, who are essentially taken hostage to them, no one here, all these lovers of human rights, no one pays attention to them. so our human rights ombudsman tatyana moskalkova. she said that the list of 86 prisoners who were exchanged for horsemen did not include civilians. ukraine has actually taken hostage ordinary people who have nothing to do with the special operation, people who do not have citizens and who have russian passports. and now they are denied

to exchange, because a certain principle of mirroring must. among them are four employees, rosatom, 90 truckers. 10 fishermen. fishermen. these were engaged in fishing in the black sea, in fact. e, in violation of all possible international legal norms, they turned out to be actually hostages. now we are working to return the truckers of more than 10 sailors. today , a new number of prisoners were taken. you can say this because they do not give the opportunity to return to their homeland. i don't overdo it. i am not citing here any facts that there are people with russian passport. the same trucker was driving, it turned out that he was on ukrainian territory, they don’t let him out. well, this is, in fact, the hostage of the state of ukraine takes russian citizens hostage. we now only well at least 100 people have listed for what is known.

well, what is surprising here, someone expected, what else are you here, this indignation is not very clear to me, just as it is incomprehensible. e our indignation. that's how they can behave like this in the security council. sorry, i think it's only for kids. sada, first of all, fairy tales about some kind of supranational international bodies that are guided by the truth by the truth and nothing but the truth of any national interests are suitable. these organs are functioning normally. only when there is a balance of power after our surrender in the ninety-first year, all these structures are controlled by the west. we are now de facto. in a state of hybrid let it be hybrid, but wars from the west and therefore all international bodies will do exactly what the west needs to destroy us. this is the first. secondly, i do not understand again our desire

to prove them wrong. so i don’t understand how it is possible, in principle, just imagine a situation, how you can prove to a slanderer in no way that he is telling a lie about slander. if he himself knows well what it is. eh, not true. he can't prove it. he can be made not to slander any other option. there is no need to build any structures here. these will come there. they will have some authority to guarantee the security council. these are all fairy tales about this territory. it is necessary to hold an investigation to punish the perpetrators themselves for this crime, and slanderers. there, in the event of a successful completion of our operation with all the goals that the president has set, they will quickly bring. wait, sergeyevich, this is very good. i just like it too. but how can we again be in this position, including the president.

ah, today peskov reminded us that we are not going to occupy ukraine and never intended to do so. it is clear that if ours were standing in a bucha, these photographs would not have appeared, if we had not left from there, but we had left from there, because it was, as it was said again, and not just a gesture of sand. good will. today, the presidential press secretary said that it was a personal order, and we demonstrated our goodwill to the supreme commander-in-chief. well , the truth is received, as always, so the saying goes does not . i didn't receive the welcome, but we can't do that. i don't see the contradiction in occupying these territories. we came out of there now , just because we came out of there does not mean that we are going there we won't be back. this is the first. secondly, from the fact that the president said that we will not occupy ukraine, it does not follow that we will not return there again. open textbooks on international law. you will learn what is occupation occupation -

is the temporary occupation of someone else's territory. we are not going to temporarily occupy someone else's territory. this is what the president said, and i absolutely agree with him, therefore, if this operation is carried out, it is possible to successfully conduct an investigation. i think we will have more than enough. good? i want to say peskov again, wait. i want to get back to speaking again. uh, sergey lavrov who i myself am at the beginning of today. i have already mentioned that buch's provocations were carried out. that's right, but the chosen moment. and show us, please, in the opinion of the russian foreign minister, the purpose of this fake buchinsky is to disrupt the negotiation process, during which the kiev emissaries informed the russian side in writing about their readiness to make ukraine, i repeat, neutral, non-nuclear , non-bloc deployment of foreign military bases on its territory from conducting military exercises without the consent of the guarantor countries, in the same proposals ukraine was

spelled out by ukraine, and the thesis that security guarantees for this country do not apply to crimea and donbass, and now instead of continuing to work in this, as sergei lavrov said, in a positive direction, and the ruling forces in kiev staged this provocation. let him hear that the ukrainian side has decided to demand that in the event of a treaty, oh, which i am now talking about, within a few days all russian hostilities were stopped. forces have left ukraine and after that a referendum is to be ratified in parliament, we do not want to play such cat and mouse. well, i will add that the kiev regime again tried to evacuate the leaders of the battalion from mariupol. azov is an attempt. it turned out to be unsuccessful again, this was told in our ministry of defense by two ukrainian helicopters trying to break through to the city

from the sea and they were shot down. previously, we repeated our proposal was brought to the kiev regime through all available channels, and the possibility of the exit of the units of the ukrainian armed forces voluntarily laid down their arms from mariupol. however, these proposals by the kiev regime are constantly ignored, taking into account their lack of interest. kiev , in order to save the lives of its servicemen, mariupol will be liberated from nationalists by units of the russian armed forces. and the donetsk people's republic it means exactly, if sergey lavrov, uh, says that ukraine first began to demand immediately after, uh, the provocation of the immediate withdrawal of russian troops, there is a referral, and so on and so forth, does this mean that a provocation - this meant an attempt to refuse their own

proposals, which have already been drawn up in writing in istanbul quite, perhaps quite perhaps, but i do not see any progress at all in these negotiations, because even those proposals that were voiced with the ukrainian side and looked at least to some extent realistic. they were all the same for russia in this case categorically insufficiently unacceptable. i would put it this way. and even anatoly shariy, who, by the way, does not believe in anything, does not believe in this provocation in the bucha . he's such a rather unbelieving approach. here, those present special operation race refers to the extremely negative writes that e dear residents of bucci. confirm the information that they have written to me many times already, that on march 30 the troops. the russian federation left from 31 in the evening to april 3 there were terrible machine gun bursts. uh, someone there tells him that this has never happened before. side centers bullish, then subsided. so he asks for this information, which many of us send izbuchi to confirm other residents. they are there immediately

it is used as a pressure factor. a case with mh17 was used by this downed god, which no one remembers now, and many others for history, in principle, war crimes of the west and various kinds of provocations. well, this is a banality, in fact, anyone at all now remembers there about the village of sanguine, for example, well, lord, about the village of sanguine. nobody no longer remembers. it just does not know yes, yes, yes, thank you, victor appreciate your significance of aggression against the wonders of the american fighter. he destroyed the train that was on the bridge; in my opinion, 200 people died there, and no one suffered for it. as far as i understand, even as if it were not. now let's play a little garage. yes, let's be quiet, film garage, let's play a little soul our viewers look like no viewers could miss it. andrey vladimirovich was sitting with a sign today that is not right, what is wrong. first ukraine in negotiations tambule, did not promise anything. she uh, that is, you

want to say that the minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation sergey lavrov is lying? no i like i want to say that i now give it. i just watched yesterday what a little video from our telegram program was called confrontation with e. yes, no, yes, yes, i poked, andrey vladimirovich did not promise anything, how does lavrov then say that it was written on paper, so he gives uh one uh, correct picture from his point of view, what was there? in fact, the ukrainian side she gave on paper, indeed. she said she could, she didn't promise anything. she said that she could agree to consider the question of the monkey. there is a status of neutrality and so on and so forth under a number of conditions, one of the first conditions is the rejection of the position of the russian side that this should be a peace treaty? and this can only be from the ukrainian side an agreement on

guarantees, uh security, this is the integrity of ukraine once, twice. so they really said that everything that was said cannot be accepted by ukraine and the treaty will not have any direct effect until the referendum is held, the referendum must pass said months. that is, in fact, in fact, there was no breakthrough there and there is no need. uh, again, to give rise to hopes that in our viewers, that there is some kind of there then say say exactly what you are trying to say in a veiled way ukraine first makes some sentences written on paper. albeit not completely, suiting russia, but already some proposals that move us some there to some kind of final after which ukraine sabotages its own. the paper presented by them. this means that ukraine these mr. rahami in a cap and stuff they sabotage. they also submitted proposals. here

again, come on, come on, well they didn't offer anything. they said we could consider. that's it, there were no proposals to negotiate their leaflet at all. if they wrote we can consider. and now the offer we can no longer consider. i'm talking about this the problem is that they know what they put on paper. these were obviously impassable options, on which they correctly treat the process of the ukrainian side taking a pen and paper and writing something positive. these are also different contracts, because there is such an anecdote that we are worms. remember son. there is nothing worse than the light at the end of the tunnel. so, in short, it has now been confirmed, that is, the doubt that our population generally visits regarding. what generally happens on these negotiations, because we see some two

mutually exclusive realities. this is some kind of reality there are ukrainian negotiators. which, apparently somewhere with closed trees , make some sincere promises and guarantees, from which we are ready to go, but completely. perhaps, perhaps, we don’t know this, we haven’t seen it, because when they come out of there, they say completely different things, mr. zelensky has already promised to imprison all of us, or even worse, here the other day, as you know. we were promised. yes you understand, this is a promise. well, apparently, somewhere something is happening that you can make sweeping gestures, and take and withdraw troops from the kiev region from the chernihiv region, yes, and after that, what should happen happen because a nazi remains a nazi. let me remind you that we can try to say something here, but there the negotiator from the ukrainian side was killed in kiev under unclear circumstances, and there are such a number of deaths that the ukrainian side of people, absolutely strangers, confirmed most go to the top ten. and when we speak but how could it really happen here on the ukrainian

side? it's natural, as in this video. and there are boys without blue ribbons, you can shoot at them. yes, all the time for some reason we are surprised that a nazi behaves like a nazi. in our country, in general, the negotiating line is inverted, because the first point should be denocification, because all other promises are without it. it’s generally they refused to turn off those conspiracies and refused to turn on the non-nuclear status , and then they themselves offer a short pause a little. we stalled. this is where you need to break. don't miss the sanctions on central television, the states are going to bring things to default, and europe will fence itself off from russia with the great european wall, but how will they do it? a split in european unity why european elections are won by politicians who are ready to be friends with russia transport blockade of

kaliningrad why could europe's possible decision to close the borders of the russian enclave be a weighty reason for war? it will be yours central television on saturday at 19:00 on ntv chingachguk premiere today at 20:00 on ntv magnet takes care of you and offers discounts on your favorite servelatvin products. papa can 129.90 magnit family of stores we are close we are with you julia at the banquet. there are so many places in the world where it is more fun than standing in the toilet. hurray full protection of the bladder. buy diapers for newborns and our softest panties premium kea diapers for wiles in magnet stores for any pet. there are always products in magnet stores.

temporary tomorrow will save you from the problem of excuses, viardo forte man magnet takes care of you and offers discounts on your favorite products, bulmen hot stuff 79.90 magnet family of stores we are nearby. we are with you ntv always works for you. stay in touch. watch live broadcasts of live news when you need them programs for every taste tv series anytime and anywhere all day long on the website www.ntv.ru and ntv applications and today ntv works for you. is our earth flat seeing this, anyone, you know doubt aliens exist. this is definitely not computer graphics, and psychics really treat for the sake of truth. we don't care about

money. we hope someone will surprise us sergey malozemov goes to see a fortuneteller. i took such tales. he studies an alternative history, which batu naturally, i said, did not burn, looking for fantastic creatures against the forest. and checks with a scientific method all unknown phenomena deceive the new scientific investigations of sergey malozemov on saturday at 15:00 on ntv meeting place on ntv place, where everything becomes clear we continue, but some believe that