[000:00:00;00] let me remind you that ukraine does not comply with any of its promises and agreements last week, kiev withdrew, removing the clauses about crimea and donbass from it, and zelensky himself significantly increased russophobic rhetoric. yes , i feel hatred for russia for russian soldiers when i see these images before my eyes killed. children, no legs, no arms. this is an insult. this is horror. and the intention to become security guarantors for ukraine was previously announced by germany, italy, france and turkey. but the united states, great britain, which most of all fit for zelensky while they are silent. although it is up to them in general, according to analysts, the settlement of the conflict in ukraine depends after the end of the cold war, the united states repeatedly tried to transfer the work of ensuring peace in europe to the europeans, but since russia always stands on the threshold of europe, this work is too big for europe alone, it is only on remains committed to nato in words, which

emboldened russia and now the results are evident in ukraine so viktor zhozevich of the country. uh east the middle one is far, which provides some guarantees to zelensky, how realistic it is. well, there are two questions here, firstly, what is meant by security guarantees, this is the key question, because we don’t know ukraine, because we don’t understand what zelensky sees in his head. i say, excuse me, i’ll interrupt you, as a kind of separate mini-nato for ukraine, so that these countries, which guarantee to be ready in case of anything, almost in a military way, so simply speaking for the territorial integrity of security and so on, that means. kiev were different, uh, the signals on this subject were signals that some that, perhaps, indirect indirect there indirect military intervention. something else for other countries, that they want, like , more countries to participate in this. they understand that, of course, ninja not china will never

sign up for the use of their military force to guarantee within the guarantee of ensuring the security of ukraine. but this as it is also a block for a number of western countries, after all, not the americans are not the british, frankly. let's say that the french are not going to use and now they are not using their troops to counter ukraine against russia, uh, the second, and another reason why london and washington are not striving. now, in general, they don’t want to discuss this especially, as if they don’t want to be involved in this topic, but progress is significant in the negotiations at this stage. they believe that it is beneficial for ukraine continued while hostilities. so that kiev does not give up, does not sign any agreements with the russian federation, they believe that what is happening in ukraine is beneficial. now they are for the west to continue. here they are, more or less. and this is where the recent visits

of european leaders, including johnson's, to kiev have stopped. this is exactly what they are talking about - these are support visits, which, in fact, tell the ukrainian leadership that they are continuing to deal with them, you are now coping with them. we will support you. than we can. continue in the same spirit. this is the signal, which is a hypocritical position. viktor dzhezefovich comes to them, the conditional president zelensky, who says, be my husband. be the guarantor of my safety. yes very much you about this process. and what do these imaginary guarantors say to him? no, you still go floundering there. can you make it? here i am , floundering around. well, we'll look further, maybe, find ivan in a week and these are ivan's allies, namely for this the policy that the western countries introduced in the fourteenth year and it is precisely for this that they led it in such a way that they need ukraine, like a battering ram against russia, in fact, they do it in this way, if the western side is really not interested in discussing all this, uh, in one franchise. but uh, the president of belarus

said not so long ago that it is impossible to conduct these negotiations without belarus. and what is the interest? eh? well, i'm not what minsk says there, but let's act as a guarantor of ukraine's security or such an opportunity. well, first of all, we are talking about what a guarantee of security is outside depending on what this restriction of the sovereignty of ukraine is included in, this is what was called the capitulation regime in the 19th century, that is, official kiev quite publicly declares on the international arena we are ready to become an international protectorate of this position. we do not accept what we are interested in. we have over 1,000 km. here with this state that is not controlled by anyone. we want to clearly understand what we will have south of our borders. what will be the regime? what will be the political one? we run who guarantees safety our borders and moreover, the west accuses belarus of some utter sins. actually. we are an ally of the russian federation yes, there are russian troops on our territory, they are in the infrastructure to support the russian special

military operation. and naturally. we have a right to participate. e in determining the future of the territory in which this operation takes place. and you in the previous part we discussed the information war to participate in this not to participate. is it important in non-winning or not? i know you have experience you are on the information front. in ukrainian, you tried to speak live on the ukrainian channel. why true but? how was it, how was it? please tell this story. i don’t know, well, they launched a channel in russian, it specifically broadcasts to a russian-speaking audience. they decided for something. uh, to know my opinion, uh, before that, showing such a rather mocking video to belarus about our information system. well, i started to say what i really think is special. military operation, they stopped at this e began, so we entered into such a dispute, then they turned off the air altogether, they started some kind of polemic among themselves, and then they put it to me in correspondence that it turns out, i set them up, because in their field i began to talk about the things

they didn't like. they expected that you would be the guarantor of their information security. and you, i, you failed antonch. firstly. uh, lavrov has already proposed to include a squad in belarus. uh, it means guarantor countries. it was already an official statement. well, alexander grigorievich said that secondly, listen, this should be treated as a husk that zelensky specially creates no peace treaty zelensky is now interested in any guarantor countries he is not interested, especially since the united have already answered that they most likely will not be ready . this is an official statement, the states spokesman, that they will not be ready to support these means by a guarantor and provide all these guarantees. here, and we are talking about the fact that europe is the west, they are interested in meaning that this is all continued, but we are not just talking about it, mr. barrel first on saturday already told us today, and then today

he said in plain text that the war is up to the last ukrainian. the conflict must be resolved by military means, what kind of peace treaty. in general, we are discussing what he is impossible about, that zelensky is grimacing at the camera and such photos are being taken. you can do this on the internet, while we started the story with this, where he sits on a ladder, there are four light fixtures, there are two photographers, and he means the president of a warring country. take me down chemical list. there is a photo right there. here i show. this is how he sits posing, when he speaks there, he wants to cry, johnson arrives, a bunch of photographs of video materials come neighing merrily, so the delegation will learn, it seems, everything was officially set up there and again neighing all merrily, what are you talking about? these are liars. liars are a stone to me, no zelensky needs any peace treaty. he is playing for time, he understands perfectly well that here is the political and other support that europe provides him, which pumps him up

weapons and will pump even more. well, actually in defense of a little bit of liars and others, but we are also here on the defense of liars, uh, so to speak, everything is strange before our eyes. we also sometimes discuss some kind of tragedy and, accordingly, we mourn on the other side in the same program. someone can joke and everyone laughs, because we are not presidents, we all look at the countries next to the dead. let's recognize it is necessary to juggle the dead here, and we stand and laugh. yeah uh every day, then we probably we will still laugh sometimes, as undertakers, for example, do. you know, they are quite funny people, people who don’t dedicate to protecting zelensky later. indeed, this is the undertaker the undertaker of ukraine - this is a good comparison. let’s get away with this, look no, what’s the card, as for, really don’t see the difference in our discussion, when we discussed one topic

that really evokes emotions alone, and then went to advertising and after 15 minutes discussed somewhere you really don't see the difference here. here between this and mr. zelensky who mean to tell with every interview how he does not sleep, cries and so on, and then appears in front of the cameras, mrs. vonderlein and with the lord johnson and laughs in the voice of truth, you compare it to blue. they don’t see the difference with the eye and saying, we ourselves are so serious now, ivan sergeyevich , firstly, i don’t see the difference that we are all people and in this case we are public people in the sense that we are closer to zelensky than most people who watch us, you are closer to green. i from him we are people public, therefore, well, yes, we sometimes laugh and sometimes. sorry crying. and sometimes, if we are actors, we do something on camera and it’s better than flashing people for whom we really aren’t actors, this is our separation, but an important point about returning to the security guarantee. i've been listening for a long time. since, that is, you want to say that and we say what we think, even if sometimes we

allow ourselves, it may not be quite adequate behavior, adequate to the topic that is being discussed, but since we are not actors. we say what we think about the president of ukraine the actor, so he says what someone needs, and not what he thinks, in fact, i understand you correctly, no? no, no, look at the late zhirinovsky yes, he could make himself, how to say, force him there, how to play some kind of role. he, if this does not mean that he does not agree with what he says, that he was just spurring himself on. yes, somewhere he began to shout, somewhere he began to swear at someone, but this does not mean that he is constantly in paradise, the same applies to living green. yes, of course, he sometimes includes an actor, we see it, there in those frames that are shown here, well, such a person, but if you are an actor and you put the president of a warring country in a situation, then you sometimes turn on an actor to demonstrate your history. although it may be, it is very sad. so, this is not a real president after all.

why because you can yes? yes, turn on the grief. well, it means that when you need to turn on skorik, when you need it, he turns on something else there, but this is real times president. you know, when they kept people hired, that is, women walked who did not know the deceased and cried. and what is that too? well here is what they get too. yes, the old days, when a girl married uh, they also gave out, you know how they cried. so what? yes? well, that is, you see in the fact that vladimir volfovich oddly enough. it will sound about him, but in fact he did not make any decisions about war and peace, and thousands of tens of thousands of corpses are on his conscience. oddly enough, no, even though it seemed to no one, how about him. now the smell did not write, but there is a lot of writing. and zelensky what is the main problem of zelensky in my opinion, do you understand? the president of a warring country, he came to power in a completely different way. he just did, yes, poroshenko

offered the ukrainians the world and that, yes, the series that was before that. it was a series, what does he generally forget about an honest guy who came to power as an indicator to hypocrites that he says what he thinks, and for 3 years 3 years he led ukraine to war. he brought her exactly, laying her just in this ram. and when he is now standing on the corpses , he starts to giggle, and when he is posing. you see, this is a very cynical person, just the most rotten thing that can only be when you hid your family abroad. naturally , you are actually under the protection and guarantees of even the country with which you are at war, according to your own words, because they have repeatedly said about you that you are legitimate and they will not shoot at you. and you sit and pretend. i hate someone. i'm posing for someone. you see, here to this man i want to spit in the face, because this is not even the position of a politician. this is the most infamous thing possible, because on his owls. in general , all the corpses of this story from both sides , and even those whom he calls to die for ukraine , he sent them to be slaughtered, knowing those people who are

now dying. on his side in mariupol, this is also on his conscience. although there is no conscience here at all . this is the very rottenness of zelensky, he is much worse than poroshenko, this is actually the most probably low man in the history of the post-soviet space. that's the thing, two, as mr. peskov says, yes, they are needed for a tank. two, including for hostilities between two countries , you need space immediately about the fact that you need two peskov or lavrov for a tank. you can use it anywhere. and how would you pass for a person who knows some there more than you wait. we will now say a few words. now it is completely closed easier and let's say that he is absolutely inappropriate analogies here. so as if something about the war. come on to the last ukrainians, and the us senate passed a law on lenses conditionally associated with the great patriotic war, but the principle is actually excellent for the american military industry, it is loaded and delivers something to ukraine will pay for it. well, it’s clear on credit themselves, kiev

’s land list allows you to transfer weapons free of charge with the condition that the country pays for it later, for example, russia, the successor to the ussr, paid for us support during world war ii only in 2006, and negotiations on the amount compensations have been going on for many years, in the case of ukraine, the amount of assistance has already approached $ 15 billion, which is interestingly allocated without lend-lease, like all other military equipment and weapons, which did not prevent the western press from presenting the senators of the savior who supported the law peace. the most bureaucratic delays are removed, and payment for supplies is postponed until later . american legislators resort to extraordinary tactics. this is another sign that the us and its european allies believe that russia's actions in ukraine pose an existential threat to the liberal order, the saviors of the world. they are western creditors. now the ukrainian budget is being hastily filled with

billions of dollars, according to the ministry of finance of ukraine , borrowing at the beginning of the year amounted to $5.5 billion , which is already 120% more than planned. although without it at the time of the start of the military special operation. kiev owed the west more than $60 billion . the scale of destruction in ukraine caused by russia's colossal aggression considering this is from our external creditors it is necessary to demand a write-off, debts of international financial organizations should review the debt policy and zero out the debts of ukraine, but, and there is no question of gratuitous assistance from the imf . will be able to, and therefore more and more hysterically demands to send the frozen russian assets to pay off ukraine's debts to the west. three sources of funding are frozen funds for russia, there is confiscation and reparation. the second

one is similar - this is russian property, the third one - this is the means of western partners already. today. we are in talks to set up a recovery fund. we have already received more than $3 billion aleksey gennadievich but when the regime changes in ukraine, and it will obviously change at certain moments. who pays off these debts with you really raises a big question and attracts attention. and the fact that when they say , uh, all western countries, and help for ukraine they everyone says the amount. here. pay attention to this, but it’s impossible not to notice barrel says, we will support ukraine, which is fighting against russian aggression, and the last 500 million another billion and so on. well, yes, and i must say that in addition to credit money , gratuitous money is also allocated as humanitarian aid from the side of

ordinary people from the side of the organization. it capular is a drop in the ocean. compared to what is promised now. yes, they will pay for all this. and again, uh, no one knows how it ends. you, so to speak, ivan sergeevich, are expressing confidence that the regime will change and so on. and i'm not going to predict. now there is very little information there in order to present some kind of full-fledged picture now, and to guess what will be there, and according to the results of military specialists. no , look, uh, again alekseevich yes, why is it important to talk about the informational component again? yes but it's true, well because it's integral also plays. the hurdy-gurdy is an unacceptable part of the war, exactly the same as what happens at the front with victims and murders. exactly, well, maybe not to the same extent, yes, but one way or another, the informatic plays. why because information

allows to legitimize or decimize the assistance of missile weapons of murder and so on. this cannot be overlooked. this is criminal in the current situation, it is criminal viktor rzhavchik. i will predict. who will pay for lend lisa everything supplies, humanitarian military and others will pay and are now paying the western taxpayer, because in any case, you see, when the soviet union won, then, like one of the hedgehogs, it really paid money, but we know one thing that means if we win, then of course, we will not pay for the supply of the weapons that killed our soldiers. this is obvious. if it turns out that kiev somehow wins and they simply don’t have the money to pay, which means or otherwise these the costs will fall on western taxpayers. everyone understands this very well, both in america and in europe and in

other countries that zelensky has now asked for south korea. uh, arms shipments. everyone understands perfectly well that no one will particularly compensate for this. let's go back to your first version for me on something more relevant. as you said , we will win. we in ukraine are changing power, that's all, and there is no husk there. there are some new people, while ukraine remains an independent state. well he just saves some sovereignty. this country will be like money. she won't pay. she will not, but reimburse, uh, the costs that, uh, the actions of the previous movement, of course. all we are talking about, you know, as you advance, including the russian troops, it is formed from already local people. that is, it turns out that with these weapons, which are now being delivered to ukraine, they kill and will kill not only russian soldiers and officers, but also those ukrainians who in one way or another

contribute to the russian forces, therefore they pay to pay for the supply of weapons to kill their own people, of course, the new government in ukraine will not. no there very much i literally you about information about information history three times. they said their time was eaten by alexei gennadiev. alexander nikolaevich is the successor of the current regime. that's all alexander nikolaevich what receivers? what did you try so hard for? yes, shove your cue and immediately learn it. yes, the successor will pay. it will not be anything, of course, western consum- this is the most, the taxpayer pay something. well, all this will be compensated for by confiscated russian assets, that is , the smoogol version. it seems to me, right, this version is perfect. it can be seen that this is not pirated in order to win in the sense in which we talk about not paying for this you need

to win. all nato victory. wait about the reserves. here you just said, i can not no. for example, france, which, as it claims, has frozen, there are 15-20 billion reserves. so you will go voluntarily to get yours already honestly, money stolen from the russian central bank and given away to pay off some ukrainian debts. why is it your pure stolen it will lie down with you, and then how would you like it, yes, yes, and everyone’s hands stood up. no. remember the history of the gold assets of the third reich, kept in switzerland after all. all this went to compensate only the third reich destroyed the state. and here it is not necessary to destroy the state. you already have these assets confiscated. they are no longer yours. honest filibuster alexander nothing who stole your money ivan sergeevich

someone stole your money some frenchman alexei gennadievich we have time. excuse me, let's what is it that they froze it was stolen? i think it was stolen. no, the ukrainians have not yet announced in the process that they will already steal, but have not yet fixed it. it's on paper. let's do a wallet wallet on a string. he's already running away. so naturally, in the event of e-victory, the victorious end of a special military operation. and i am sure that this is what victory will be. someone regime that will appear in ukraine won't and won't pay. for another simple reason, it is not due to the fact that there is an assignee or something else, simply. no. you do n't even care about money. the fact is that the west naturally does not recognize him. uh, there will be a government in exile and , accordingly, this government will owe this time the second money they will not have. yes, but they

don't have money. this, of course, is the second. oh about ours. e assets that this is the correct wording in the process of theft go like this if we fail in this operation and the current regimes save money, it doesn’t have it right, but the west then pays with itself with the money of the vanquished, that is, with our money. but if we win again in this operation, then the west will have to negotiate with us , because they perfectly understand that russia, which emerged victorious from this battle with the west as a whole, because on this field we are fighting with the west as a whole, is simply so you steal more than 300 billion will not allow you to answer. so it won't seem like much. and then suddenly they will remember about international law the past, not-not-nevo, romantically develops no

romance no romance. i will give an example, but small historical examples of how the west of the entente disappeared in our country in the twentieth year. eh, bessarabia, and suddenly this viennese. well, that is, the paris agreement was declared that bessarabia is given to their ally to the russian sphere, but given to romania. violation of all international rules, they were not allies. there was a point there that if the legislative power was restored in russia , the legitimate power, that is, the bolsheviks, then the west will also consider its claims to this territory, but will not return the territory. it was straight. then the thirty-ninth year is recorded there. 48 no, sorry, forty- fortieth year russia puts forward an ultimatum and demands that russia was then called the soviet union. it was the soviet union and what is happening suddenly all

the countries that signed the bessarabian agreements as guarantors remembered international law. they romania rushes to italy says what to do and says. look, you've violated international law. bring back they rush to japanese japanese. they say, yes, you have violated international law. they rush to england, which churchill also signed, says you violated international law, negotiated with the set table yourself and the third reich in the same way, because there was strength and at that moment everyone had to negotiate with russia in exactly the same way here, if we win on battlefield, then they will have to negotiate and return, which is, uh, in front of us now in the process of implementation. i now let's in them is the main task small

let's take a break. information is needed to attack precisely pensioners. who is engaged in no body no case? it's rats and all. just stars the whole eye of 8 people is huge as many as three. well, i'll figure it out and punish, we are looking for a criminal and we will find i promise. everyone stand afraid of weapons lowered. let's talk quietly chingachbuk. vidal premiere today at 20:00 on ntv mask new season on sunday at 20:40 on ntv how long can you wait for the courier? order cosmetics at apteka.ru 20% discount on your first order. have you ever wondered what your

victims. i didn't do it chikatilo the final season. it is important for a large reliable bank to be at arm's length from a person, like sovcombank in three minutes in two clicks on one call, in order to make a deposit and raise the interest rate of sovcombank, come closer to people more often and stay longer. yes, i've been waiting for you for half an hour, san sanych, come in next door adenoma. the prostate, not the best neighbor of parting with prostate adenoma, contributes to the anti-inflammatory properties of the drug longidase longidase. don't tweak life under the elderly we continue to walk through the country of talent in the year of the cultural heritage of the peoples of russia well, tell us where you came from we came from the city of belgorod hello from the kursk nightingales you are

delightful. it's like i'm traveling now. but the power of music made us forget, in general, you were above the ground. how do you do it? to embarrass me on friday at 8:50 pm on ntv, this is the meeting place on ntv, the place where everything becomes clear. we continue so that you do not get the impression that we are a little carried away here, as if we had such a dilage with the skin of a

bear that has not yet been killed, when we talk about what will be there near kiev , we won’t pay with what, and i have such a proposal. eh, actually. we probably never talked about this before. and how are things going with the ukrainian economy and with the ukrainian financial markets in general? uh, let's take advantage of the fact that today we don't have andrei vladimirovich fedorov, because now he would immediately begin to shout that this is all wrong. here. i emphasized once again that these are not our notions of insinuation, we are based on official ukrainian statistics per application. here are the official ukrainian leaders, well, andrey vladimirovich then. well, he wants to be there, then he will refute something. let's see. ah, on saturday, ukraine announced the cessation of trade with russia, which is $8 billion a year for a large amount, the country bought products only from china and germany, while almost half of russian imports came from natural resources. that is , what went into industrial processing, and not on the

shelf in stores, it is precisely such actions that will become our contribution took out the roofing of the russian economy and thus will contribute to our victory from the shelves. essential commodities have already disappeared , large canned goods are sold out for fresh vegetables and meat, there is simply no prospect for next winter. the darkest sowing campaign in ukraine has not really begun yet. but it is already known that the robbed decided to sow the clearing with whimsical peas and buckwheat. at the same time, there is an acute shortage of grain in the country, and the problem was known last year, but since then it has only gotten worse , the main stocks have been taken out. and what's left is according to the state reserve grain twenty years ago. he claims that every ukrainian is already starving. 45% of families worry about finding enough food one in five are forced to use different ways to overcome hunger, including reducing the volume and number of meals. bursts and the banking