this is the meeting place on ntv forgive me the place where everything becomes clear. we continue. so now let's talk about our distributors. uh, this is all sorts of information, so to speak, and vyacheslav volodin the other day hmm suggested thinking about introducing a procedure for depriving citizenship and banning entry into russia, uh, for such people. well, for example, and people like uh, ms. ovsyan nobody marina ovsyannikova, you remember this, yes, the former editor of channel one, who was trying to kitten here not so long ago . andrey embarrass him with his dirty a poster, but let's do it, so she is mrs. ovsyannikova now got a new job. she is now in devel, strawberry. let's listen to vyacheslav volodina now, and then i 'll say a few more words. there are also those who behave vilely

, treacherous, they make a statement, presenting them as their personal convictions, as a struggle for peace, but in reality, then all this turns out to be a staged by one of the nato countries, in which the actors, after playing the role, receive state department cookies. think about what would happen if something like this happened. in the united states, at best, they would have made an outcast with the defeat of all rights and opportunities. unfortunately, for such citizens of the russian federation there is no procedure for deprivation of citizenship and a ban on entry into our country. but perhaps it would be right. the fact that ovsyannikova will work as a freelance correspondent for the develt and prepare materials from russia and ukraine was told, in fact, in the management of the publishing house. axel springer. ovsyannikova herself said that she would work for free so as not to fall under the the law on foreigners is usually agents, but the very fact of working in a respected publication, equal in status to a russian businessman. uh, important to her in terms

of career advancement. she has already prepared the first material. the column is called russians are afraid. she writes that the russians are so intimidated that they don’t pick up the phone again, e.g., if there is an unfamiliar number for any word against the special operation, you can get 15 years and go to jail, and the editors highly appreciated this material and are happy there what they got collaborator with and i quote with an unvarnished view of reality. here is a little remark. uh, that means, despite the fact that mrs. ovsyannikova writes that for any word against the special operation, you can get 15 years. here she is. as you remember, i received 30,000 rubles. fine. well, she was fired from the first channel alexander nikolaevich you still remember from the time of the belarusian protests that the government, if it really considers itself a power of ceremony, should not and should respond very harshly to attempts to undermine this power. that's what

do you think about those russian citizens who e. well, here is how marina ovsyannikova is trying to conduct some kind of activity with us. now it really makes a difference. just if you'll excuse me, if you are through the seventeenth entrance, but you come to us here on there for sure. you see, yes has been standing with a poster for many days. well, the difference between the onic and belarusian rebels, let's call them that, is precisely in this they went out into the street, but it went live on telecom. yes, you are a big difference. they wouldn't now either they wouldn't showed physical resistance and carried out acts of violence, and in the m-th representatives of the authorities. there was some person who would have been like that, but here they are, well, this is my personal perception, but they came out with lgbt flags, which is absolutely unpleasant. here,

well, maybe someone likes it. i think it's wrong they dispersed. so they demanded. uh changes in the composition of the government, in fact, as i believe, without offering an alternative, because what they offered was not an alternative. this is some kind of horror. but here you don't see it. and here i am i don't see anything. she came out with a piece of paper saying that this is the same thing, well, to argue, if some kind of marina would run into the air of the belarusian tv channel, during those events, come back to her place. give him twenty or two years. yes, come back to yourself, then you would also be so humane to her. i’m just such humanism from you, to be honest, for a long time. the fact is that i believe that there should be adequate things if people take up arms, this

position was formed back when the dpr appeared with the lpr, if people attempt an attempt relatively power changes, yes. here, as it were, if people, like weapons, go out into the square. or just even throwing stones, they must be even more so by armed means. it is clear that andrei nikolaevich is in the case. well, communicate with him in the form of boots, so mrs. ovsyannikova is that there are two things that overwhelm me inside and what i understand from the point of view of the law. like us what i think they are inside. i won't say this because it shouldn't be broadcast. this is my personal attitude, again, to similar ones there and not only at home. here, as for the law, it was announced to us that the investigative committee was conducting an inspection, if the investigative committee did not find corpus delicti in her actions, then i can’t show the lord to everyone except for my emotions, i can say that we probably have in this situation some imperfect laws. but i say again, if we go out and talk about the

fight against nazism, then oppose the izlum. we can only law, not lynching and anything else. well, volodin offers you a certain legislative changes address citizenship legislation. it must be formulated. clear. we are revoking citizenship. for what specific actions? this form was this for- this norm was in soviet legislation and was criticized very much later, but nevertheless it was. it was formulated and there was a tool, while we do not have a tool, and again. we cannot, mrs. ovsyannikova, apply the law after the fact. therefore, if we say it is necessary to consider, we have a legislature. at us, respectively, there is a minister. consider enact hard not hard, but it will be the law. and here are the cloud castles. it would be nice if, well, plant some oatmeal. on the basis of which the investigative committee decided that there were no grounds. everyone has passed here vyacheslav viktorovich volodin brought the discussion to a slightly different level. i’m just going to give a little information today in the article of the constitution it says that you can’t deprive

, uh, a citizen of the constitution means that yes, citizenship in order to change it is necessary go through the procedure for convening a catatonic assembly of the law on convening a constitutional assembly. still not accepted, so the words. volodin bring us back to what we have been talking about for decades , it is necessary to adopt a law on convening a constitutional assembly. this is the first second now the state duma voted in the second reading for the citizenship law. there is a procedure for the termination of citizenship, but it applies only to those who acquired citizenship not by birth, so part of the problem is solved, relatively speaking, some kind of it. uh, citizen of another country. having received russian citizenship, he committed an act that we consider incompatible with citizenship , history stops him. now with some lady producer, these are different things. she worked with svetlana, here are the terrorists who carried out the attack. in the st. petersburg metro were. these are the citizens of

russia who have received citizenship with all their citizenship. it's not different. yes, but here here. i want to join my colleague in saying that emotional relationships are one after another. well, the procedure for deprivation of citizenship should be, therefore, i think, meetings. this is understandable, but first it seems to me that we need to agree, in general, we are really going to deprive citizenship of some kind of cold. why do it? i don't know what is needed. so far, the meaning of this initiative has not completely changed for me. we have, as i understand it, wait, i understand that deprivation of citizenship should be followed by a type of expulsion. we have one criminal code, a certain experimentalism of terrorism. everything else they are all well spelled out. how does it do it? he's not just sitting. there he sits you in prison, and there you feed for the good of the motherland, who was with the violin. he committed the crime of treason. then he

went to the uk, here he is, if so, give it a second. we have the opportunity to show you the next picture, and the next picture. well, i think, well, come on, yes, yes, in fact, this is a story for him, oh, which we will show you now. it's because yes, yes, it turns out that there is no need to come up with something special, because people who hmm well, they don't behave very well, they leave anyway. in the meantime, andreevich is here, well, not all the characters in which we will now show you, here is a certain one and so on. they suspected the genre well, they suspected that only such people want to discuss now, they want obvious ones, you don’t want obvious ones , too, just what we will show now, there is no texture about the fact that they leave well. no, it still turns into a certain company and why we actually collected it, when we pay attention to what people are looking for there, how they leave citizenship, and so on. this causes a certain reaction in society, in fact,

yes? last weekend, telegram channels sensationally reported the flight to israel of the head of the accounts chamber of russia, alexei kudrin, saying that the official was noticed in one of the hotels. tel aviv, users made an unequivocal conclusion. kudrin left, otherwise he took everything about the check. there were rumors that i had been planning everything for a weekend in tel aviv, not in moscow, and on tuesday i would speak in the federation council to represent the reporting chamber, followed by rumors that showman ivan urgant was allegedly urgently getting rid of elite real estate in russia in order to permanently leave for israel oil in the fire is also added by the fact that urgant himself refuses to comment on this, and not only to journalists, but also to friends, his father explained. i just got sick of israeli citizenship, i can’t say anything, i just don’t know if it’s forbidden for us today, every person, if he has the opportunity and desire, can get a passport of any country. although i can't even say for sure.

does he have israeli citizenship now ivan in russia says it all with tails behind the movements of ksenia sobchak and does resemble some kind of reality show in especially monitors her flights to israel, sobchak herself says that she uses tel aviv as a transfer hub. no more he would like to tell. i am located on the great jordan river in the area of ​​​​the rublevo-uspenskoe highway. well, of course, this is also all murals, because apparently i am now. at least shabbat shalom is crying at the wall, you from the moscow region went to dine with your sons. for now, for everyone, in order to find out which of the russians are interested in obtaining citizenship, israel has even established a kind of surveillance of local centers. mia there noticed the ex-head of the moscow department of culture sergey kakov blogger ilya varlamov and

rapper morgenstern, the fans of the latter immediately unearthed a sensation, they say, the musician’s grandfather took him to the synagogue, and morgenstern himself has long been interested in jewish history and culture and once he even achieved an audience with the chief rabbi of russia what does this strange-looking man have to do with the jews, tories, believing in god, firstly, we open to the world accept everyone who is interested in our values. no, he is not jewish, but he took his last name from grandfather, who at one time took him to the synagogue in ufa when he was little, all these mysterious movements of russian stars, which are called on the net either rest or repatriation, the artists who remained in russia do not approve and draw a disappointing conclusion. all these people. not just traitors to the motherland, they are enemies of the people, such a difficult moment for the country, they decided to leave us to jump back and sit out the storm and quickly apply for israeli citizenship. i am not calling you.

now to discuss morgenstern's personal file. personal case. sobchak we once already spoke. this is not true. interesting. here we are more interested. why even the emerging rumors about this israeli. for some reason, the passport causes in society in social networks. such seething is such indignation, it even borders on hatred, you cannot explain the nature of this. yes, if about perception, then something like this mechanism. eh, those who are not with us are against us. now, if we, by the way, managed to present the same claim to me, but because, in my opinion, on the twenty- fifth of february, i flew to cyprus to pick up. e your was a wife. this was, in my opinion, my last post on social networks. and after that, i have not published anything since then. i instantly received claims from the series. oh, you cattle, and you go there and you mean in israel. you went to cyprus. who cares, just, uh, israel just reinforces it. so to say, jewish issues are here,

israel itself strengthens yes, but in any case, the person who left the russian federation at that moment, uh, instantly began to be perceived by society as a traitor or potential traitor. remember, shortly before a-a february, i managed to say in this studio that we had a laugh 5 minutes from the philosophical steamers. now it's funny now. i'm laughing now, where did you find the philosopher morgenstern philosopher, by the way, why not? i don't know, here, uh, it was zar. when he's with a morning star, i'm here with you photos. it's just that he smeared these satanic pictures with him, which he painted outside, he knew very well what a morgenstern is not a morgen. desk book. she is judaism. you may not believe this. you can laugh about it but it happens. that is, i have to take my doubts back comes my doubts back

morning star. perhaps a real philosopher. i'm up to this not so pass music is playing. well, this is a different ship, so who give bogdan. you see, the words of our malinovsky and all the others, they reflect the mood of the attitude towards these people, who, in this case , you trust your malinovskaya, think that she somehow decided to saddle it, perhaps, but i i know the mood of ordinary people i don’t know the way they how they treated and urganta and uh loved watching the program. eh, they approached and took pictures, shook hands with armor and were always perceived by everyone as something equally alien and as something hostile, but only now it is hostile alien-other. it's taken off the oil. that's all. this is how it is related to this depending. unfortunately, depending on age and some beliefs, because among my acquaintances i have enough people who consider the morning star. a very talented person who considers a morning star to be

some kind of voice, but generations, so like this that's what everyone has always seen that he is not ours, then not everyone. let's go back to ah to distinguish, uh, real traitors from i agree, not the easiest thing to do. explain what a traitor is. uh, for example, the one who directly supports the enemy side, whether it be western countries, various regimes of ukraine and others support financially, materially, ideologically, and in some informational terms support. there are many , many here. form. this lady rider is immediately one traitor. she supported ideological informational. well, the fact is that, as far as mrs. oatmeal is concerned, and she, firstly, violated the law in russia, one can argue about how the punishment under these articles is correct there. actually. there, there was an article on the action, which is at the time that we

live, when it goes directly to the military. no, i'm just to be clear. here it is. yes, and let's say we didn't draw these ones here. here is the same philosopher morgenstern, who seems to have done nothing of the sort, just left. and what is he doing there? i don't know about. e those who are still those who left depends on how they behave. here they support openly or somehow provide some kind of support , uh, to the hostile side. so, we can directly call it a traitor. they betrayed their homeland by posting anti-russian materials in their social networks frankly. well, frankly, they support the kiev regime in their social networks. so this is a traitor. they don’t have them, but they don’t write, there, i support zelensky there slava and we are such they post, for example, a clip, uh, with appeals there to kill russian soldiers there to kill, firstly, then after a while they try to remove it very

simply, if e posted a clip of arrestovich calling for killing russian soldiers, it is obvious that this person is a betrayal, another, another, another. uh, another history of the system. we remember the fifties and the eighties and the beginning of the eighties, when people left, some people squeezed the same lemon, they gave him away, he, in fact, did nothing against the soviet regime, and today, if he were alive, he would then return at the end. here is e at the end of the videos, if lemons are alive today, he would most likely support the russian government. now not only supported the russian authorities. i think that my grandfather would now be in my hands with a machine gun, despite the age of yuri mavleev, who was deprived of soviet citizenship, squeezed out of the country, he later taught, and in the united states he also returned to uh, at the end already soviet citizenship over time. that is, simply because the person left or the person was given away, of course, yes, this is

subtle. yes, everything is clear. here's the reaction to departure and citizenship. i don't quite agree with bogdan anatolyevich here. i believe that the reactions are not from the fact that they were treated this way before, but precisely from the fact that they were seen as idols, they were seen as spokesmen for public opinion, or they occupied very high positions someone and here in a difficult moment for society . they fled from here such a reaction. and the fact that they began to take more. uh, another nationality. and here it doesn’t matter at all, then just for a second. and show us, please, this is a post in social networks. andrey vadimcha makarevich, how he reacts, he, being already in israel, he learned that here is a number of e, there his colleagues left, and how they would be condemned here in russia for the fact that they left. i see yapping about alla maxim chulpan zemfira who left, it is russia that left you, because you are russia,

and why they continue to consider themselves to be spokesmen, but these are already problems of their psyche. i'm talking here about the perception of our citizens. and the fact that they began to take the citizenship of another state. it doesn't matter if israel was sweden or something else. this makes it even worse. here is this painful reaction. this is the first thing i wanted to say the second, but doesn’t this say, but due to some kind of our limitedness, that i can’t do anything like that, for example. well, i live there in some city. uh, out in the countryside, i go to my factory and don't. i have no way not that there citizenship is foreign. and maybe even go there on a tourist trip, there twice a year and we have a lot of such people and we sort of get it, well, wait, i say, well, maybe they really are. this same a. good luck to him, as he said, here the reaction is different. i listened to his songs. i admired them. and when

it became difficult for the country, he, you found out that he wrote these songs, they are all here, about the phrase that malinovskaya used, i don’t know, though, to be honest. so we watched madagascar, she voiced the hippopotamus in the fly, you don’t remember madagascar, she was honestly known, only one thing is important who said it. twice two four important maturation does not interest us. and it is just was at dawn. it is indeed four and an internal enemy. we all need to understand this, this is a reality, and the reality is much more dangerous than all these nazi arresters put together, because our country was destroyed in february of the seventeenth year and in december of the ninety-first year. fortunately, it was not completely the internal enemy that struck from within, and our people paid for this with years of devastation and millions

of blood corpses on this public, more than enough. therefore, what no one could do outwardly the conqueror of the external enemy made the internal enemy this should be taken seriously, respectively, as if igor sergeevich that is, you are also talking about me, this is in a figurative sense about the fact that they have blood. well, what kind of blood they have on their hands, well, what kind of blood. yes , of course, the one who arranged the february of the seventeenth year. he is absolutely not responsible for what happened later in the civil war. he washed his hands and fled to france and sat there writing, by the way, all kinds yeltsin was the head of the first year that shed here , that is, yeltsin was the head of the state, and our musicians were actors there and they took the blood that is now shed . uh, in ukraine, it is on those who destroyed our country in the ninety-first year, therefore, this should be taken extremely, uh, seriously, but

in no case is it possible with such a formal method, this enemy is not an enemy. this is a very serious reason. let's try again. here, probably, except for viktor zhozev, through sergeevich, here are all the others to speak on this topic let's try, if we have time now we'll see. the girl rejected the importunate admirer, and he decided to take revenge on her dousing with armor. he tracked her, ran to the girl and jumped. it is long for her. she touches her face with this dirty snow, and it’s just that the skin from her face remains all in the snow, the chosen one also remains, the injured couple is now in an extremely difficult condition. no eyes, uh sides of the face. hands and feet. what punishment threatens a sadist from a couple who crippled life and a

schoolboy passing by, we will get not one, we will get two criminal cases. and is it possible to save those doused with acid? everything is smoking here, all the clothes are smoking and i didn’t want to accept it i didn’t believe it beyond today at 16:45 on ntv police brotherhood premiere from monday at 20:00 on ntv new models of adidas casual shoes for unique sports images this spring running basketball or tennis silhouette of sneakers, choose navalny the light will always be on. today we light it with russian volunteers for those who need help and

those who want to help our doors are open, for we turn on the light throughout the country to help gennady urgently. come to me prostatitis you are not the boss to fight prostatitis, the drug asked the fibrous property of landidat landidat, do not adjust life to prostatitis today at 16:45 on ntv, a negative result. her friend is very similar to svetlana's sister. but the woman who was born on the same day as svetlana does not believe 152 years ago she could be replaced in the maternity hospital, she did not want to know that the parent is not a pendulum. so will a mother of 81 be able to

see and hug her own daughter for the first time or fate a substitute girl, it will remain unknown. it's all very hard for the soul to know the child's mother, where he is at all and where my parents are. i don't believe. no, it's a sister. it seemed to me that sveta was very similar to me. i hide the dna envelope today 17:50 on ntv country of talents friday at 20:50 on ntv so on ntv the meeting place is traditionally at the end of the program. i remind you that you have the opportunity to join our telegram channel in the right corner of the qr-code screen. you can scan it for your smartphone and right now here to join the discussion. and you can watch our releases in rut,

bim, we are now actively trying to develop our rutile. here, and to the viewers of moscow and the moscow region, i remind you that we have the opportunity to meet in person. this will be saturday, april 16, the place of our meeting with you house of cinema central house of cinema. come tickets can be found, in general, at yandex you will type andrey norkin in a different format and you will find so, about our question. well, in general, we decided to ask you this way today, you anyway, who do we think? we can consider it necessary to consider the enemy of russia let alexander nikolayevich be the one who, on a proven basis , violates the existing articles of the criminal code. everything else is a matter of public discussion and discussion, but public discussion. i don’t attach the slightest importance , i think that this is blah blah blah so bogdan anatolyevich evil tongues scary pistol from my point of view , the enemies of russia are all those who do not share the values ​​of our people, all those who wish their

state to defeat and the one who supports external adversaries. in any conflict, it does not matter whether it is military in nature or not? maxim anatolyevich, who certainly should not be considered enemies of russia from those who have been mentioned all his life, well, pugacheva chulpan khamatova kudrin, that is. actually, the fact that people do not want to walk in formation and, like parrots, repeat primitive propaganda clichés. it doesn’t mean that i understood, but never viktorovich well, the enemies of russia are all those who used to be they were several powers on our planet. all the people it's misled either just instrument vladimir viktorovich i can only consider enemies of russia those who howl against russia only in this way. well, andrei nikolayevich in general , traitors whose actions fall under the criminal code. and there are just crappy little men who have been earning for years on these people, and in labor for well, they just took a minute and dumped them. just make sure that they

never make money from this people again and that their spirit does not exist in the cultural space. that's all. my understanding is that the enemy of russia cannot be called a person who has a russian passport. he can be a bad person, an immoral criminal, russia cannot be called enemies, they are abroad, therefore, for mr. arrestovich. and those who were named for them today, of course. in my opinion, the passport of a russian citizen means half of the cases - these are citizens, in fact. i just pulled the topic. with what i started today, it means that the history of nature is the same, what an elegant city you have. yes, this is because we feed our pigeons with beets. this was the place meeting, which cannot be changed, we meet with you on weekdays at 14:00 on ntv. good luck, goodbye.

hello, you are watching the news on ntv in yegor kolyvanov's studio. do not delay the pace of implementation. increase alternative opportunities for us. options and new windows of opportunity. vladimir putin held a meeting on the development of the arctic zone.