here is igor kovitsky. everything acquired by overwork was not allowed to be withdrawn by the hungarian border guards, demanding to declare the cash, it turned out that the wife of the people's choice was carrying 28 million dollars and almost 1.5 million euros with her. where does such an astronomical amount come from ? deputy kavitsky has more than once been accused of having connections with foreign companies, to which he helped to withdraw capital from the country for substantial kickbacks. find me at least one of the rulers of ukraine who would not be corruption corrupt, but uh. this also applies to the united states gets the impression that both for the kiev authorities and for the ukrainian oligarchs. the concept of motherland is just an empty phrase, because it was not sold for money. and even now it is a difficult time for the country, and i feel sorry for not the state, nor its citizens. they are ready. for any meanness. even those that cost people their lives, and all this is done with the sole purpose of pleasing their western curators, so that those same

multimillion-dollar tranches that are then skillfully continued do not stop. between ourselves and to remain ours in the first place for europe and america and not for their people. spiteful critics are doing everything to exclude russia from world sports. by what means will we defend our interests? should we feel sorry for the athletes who change their citizenship and legionnaires fleeing from our teams? how to hold international competitions so that they ignite the audience and allow athletes to earn status, what will happen to sports, vertical infrastructure and import substitution, we will talk about this with the relevant minister oleg well, here is one of the topics that everyone is discussing quite sharply. this is change

some of our nationality athletes. and going abroad. someone right now condemns very harshly, someone calls for understanding, after all, athletes. well, people for the sake of sports have worked all their lives. but how many athletes are we talking about. in this case, first of all, for me, in a certain world, a surprise that everyone is discussing. uh, probably in some community everyone is discussed by the sports community, as in the case of this topic. uh, in my opinion. today, it doesn’t sound sharp, uh, official appeals from national sports federations to the ministry of sports personally, there were no reports from athletes, probably, there is such a potential hmm danger and, probably, someone is thinking that if there are completely, limited opportunities for participation in international competitions for russian athletes and athletes. short enough, we know, but nevertheless, i am absolutely sure that the hmm response measures to the sanctions actions of the international federations, which are now developed by

the ministry of sports by the government, will provide. uh, the preservation of at least uh, those, uh guarantees that were provided for russian sports for athletes, this is also material. e, stimulation is also the provision of a social competition calendar, e, guarantees from the state, whether it is the provision of work, like all members of the national team and the coach. they bet on the sports ministry and we provide for them. uh, repeating here's wages. it will not be reduced in any way; moreover, we are now working on the issue of the ministry of finance on whether in order to index, according to the level of inflation, the same voices are heard demanding exclusively russia and sports in general. yes, we understand that this, of course, is not the entire sports community, but nevertheless there are such people. and we have today. what are the opportunities to defend their interest in the arbitration of international federations. and by the way, i want to note. uh, one of the lawsuits was successful. a-a satisfied, e

from the russian luge federation about the illegality of the removal of athletes and the exclusion of the federation from among the members of the international federations a. this is such a very good precedent signal we have i believe, er, strong russian lawyers. e disagrees. e individual people who say that only foreign colleagues lawyers with extensive experience in the practice of interaction with international structures are able to protect russian athletes. no, we have good law schools. we must trust them now in all spheres of our life one way or another under the influence of the so-called hellish ones. uh, the sanctions are changing. and probably undergo certain changes and some kind of sports relations there, i don’t know, but now the sports industry, but what we can change quickly, we understand sports by

sanctions, but this does not reduce us. uh, the answer is our responsibility for the implementation of strategies for the development of physical culture and sports until the thirtieth year. of course, certain adjustments will probably be made to it, taking into account the pandemic, as it was adopted in 1920 and the current situation. but er the goals of the strategy, they remain the same, and basically. they are of course associated with infrastructure with training. e. this is a long-term task, we quickly respond to the economic situation on the security of athletes, and the competition calendar. e. well, and quickly, of course, this issue cannot be resolved, related to import substitution, because, well, there were also situations when uh hmm for certain positions. uh, certain sports. uh, they turned out to be blocked because equipment and inventory were tied up there. a. well, nevertheless, the work is going on. we are even before, let's say, the

crisis period. uh, agreed and signed the strategy, together with the ministry of industry and trade, up to 35 is designed for the thirty-fifth year of import substitution in the field of sports, that is, sports science, probably, should absolutely say, so we are also attracting workers from the manufacturing industry, and research institutes, which is very important now for us to quickly solve. this is an issue related to the provision of training camps for national teams of regional teams, since we understand that travel abroad is actually limited, as of today . uh, to the fullest, we don't have enough bases sports bases, and somewhere it requires reconstruction, somewhere it needs a major overhaul, but for a certain range of sports, such a long-term sufficient program is required and the decision of the government's prompt decision on this issue. and won’t it be and you know, maybe it’s such a m-th assumption, or something, too bold to say

that right now we will see our youth olympic football teams in hockey, and in such quite traditional our competitions. i don’t know, there in the khl all of a sudden, how once our national team appears. well, so that they don't lose practice, we are now considering with the federations. uh, the maximum possible format for holding competitions in order to give athletes the opportunity to participate on the one hand, and on the other hand, the russian spectator of the hospital to see these athletes. and, for example, we plan to hold grand prix in figure skating in gymnastics for others. uh, sporting under another sport at this time seems to be the most active couple let's say for wow, revival was taken into account to the russian domestic sport. uh that we are so modest something here is the grand prix and why are the world series anything competitions? do not call overseas colleagues are not ashamed to know there is a baseball championship. here they have the

world series winner world champions it's not about embarrassment. the fact is that, despite the sanctions pressure, we continue to remain, uh, faithful to, shall we say, the international standard of conduct. yes, if some competitions are approved by the international federation, er, there world series, well, we do not pretend to name, but in content, if we return to figure skating again, but the world championship, which we took place in france and at the same time throughout, in fact our championship was held, but there are enough of them in terms of competition in terms of entertainment, er, obviously our competitions and our participants are almost all olympic champions. eh, surpassed that level. and the name to call it the world league, but you can, as you know, like his ostap bender yes , we can we already have, but we have, for example, in the

chelyabinsk region and the paris marathon knows, there is paris there is a small eiffel tower, so we can organize a run between paris and berlin on the territory of the russian federation , you mentioned that e some operational decisions related to social support are made. but is it really worth thinking about some additional solutions, because the athletes do not receive enough. there fees status. uh, what is important for athletes also remains like this gap. uh, what concerns e status. uh, the format of the competition that will be offered now will in no way, i repeat, reduce the chances of obtaining ranks and titles based on the results of participation. here in these competitions. here is the international class. will it be possible to get? yes, as far as it's concerned. it's fees and support again. yes, we are also working with a number of russian

companies and chinese companies. e for those athletes who, for a number of reasons, to whom the order of reasons was denied the continuation of contracts. i'm absolutely sure that we'll find decision and our athletes will not suffer materially. you know, here, uh, i'm not a deep person, immersed in our sports hierarchy, in general. it's hard for me to name a specific word. that's what is happening now, because a huge number of organizations departments of the ministry and so on. here, maybe now we just have the opportunity to establish some order to build some kind of more harmonious one. is it vertical? sports, so that it is clear where we are going with student sports , school sports, and so on. i am absolutely with agree with you. and now we are also preparing our proposals related precisely to building such a clear understanding of the hierarchy of the relationship of responsibility of public interaction organizations. who is responsible for mass sports? for

university sports, an important issue is related to interaction with the regions. e, and. we would also like to see the regional ministries integrated into this structure. there are difficulties of a certain nature. but now we are preparing an offer. in particular, to amend the federal law. e, which would provide us the ability to coordinate this activity we are talking about some kind of total control. right here. eh, we are talking about some rules of the game, only with the maximum consideration of the interests of the state and the maximum possible coordination on the part of the state is it possible to overcome this period and the successful development and stable development of society. whatever industry it concerns, from the point of view of the sports infra. over the past 3 years, we haven’t built anything seemingly significant of this kind, yes, or you’ll correct me. uh huh i can't agree. what and what does the iconic, of course, 12 stadiums for the world cup mean. uh, we haven't

built 12 more stadiums yet. uh, here we are actively working to improve the efficiency of using these stadiums, but rather large facilities built in omsk, novosibirsk , more than 120 facilities of the so-called sports and health complexes have been put into operation, and in the ranks on the territory of the russian federation , because only what concerns within the framework of the federal project of federal support, they are now actively working and building electricity in the regions at the expense of regional budget. uh, and to be honest, and we came to the conclusion that it is more important for people. these are the structures of the infrastructure, uh, which is understandable from the point of view of operation. eh? it is understandable, affordable and designed for maximum functionality. that is why it is absolutely expensive to maintain the stadium now. so, for this reason, the communal

apartment is the first question we ask when planning and coordinating projects - who will operate it? this is this stadium and how much it will cost and started the shoulders will be a burden in this regard, of course, the program that we have now proposed has been approved by the government for the federal business print program, the construction of sports fields. eh, it meets these interests as much as possible. pros. it actively involves the public-private partnership mechanism, plus now the program for concessional lending to e-business, which invests in construction and i hope that it will give a result of about 3 billion rubles. there will be federal budgets for the implementation of this program. well, in addition, at the expense of the funds that were. and so to speak, if possible. due to the non-participation of our athletes in the international calendar, all funds are redirected. what mikhail vladimirovich said, uh, mishustin is reoriented just to an additional site, uh,

sports grounds in the regions of the russian federation, and therefore here, probably hmm, the question is not of scale. and the question is, taking into account the time in which we live and the interests of people, stadiums were built, the olympic games were held there, the world cup was held, now it's time. let's take up the development of mass sports. and this, moreover, does not mean that we, some kind of scales outweigh for us both sports above achievements and mass sports. equally important. they are to be in harmony with the court. it should be some kind of separately autonomous. it should be, as we say, the norm of life. thank you very much for the conversation. thank you what

is happening now on the field in the newspapers will write only tomorrow the debriefing will be tomorrow talk at the cooler about the match all tomorrow, but win. you can right now on the site and in the application tomorrow. hello, i'm vladimir anatohin , ntv television company, a project of the state corporation rosatom about people endowed with knowledge and homosize technologies, present the science program and we are a program about how science will change our lives in the next 10 years. hello, i'm ekaterina shugaeva, digital communism will come in 10 years. just like that , she confidently said in such a printed style. i don't think it has been built yet. and now it's digital. well, let's deal with this well, because i invited optimists who think that through digital communism will really come in 10 years, this is anton kuznetsov good evening, good and pavel

zaitsev, a specialist in information measurement systems. hello mm. well, no, by tradition, skeptics are visiting me. we have already decided something will not come. and konstantin shurnov is a specialist in the field of information security pressure and alexander is an economist. yes good evening. at the end of the program of our guests, optimists will make a forecast. what is the probability of digital communism in 10 years? about history of cybercommunism will be told by our expert professor kapustin the main communist slogan from each according to his ability to each according to his needs, and here you need to pay attention to the word to each. and what does everyone have today, every schoolchild, every pensioner, and other other devices with which you can access the internet or chat, even though we have already tried to build communism across the ocean. now let 's build cybercommunism. although such attempts

were already in 1959. a huge building was built in moscow and packed to capacity computing machines great-grandfathers of modern computers main purpose was the distribution of everything and everyone food clothing workforce. and even the distribution of graduates in universities, an attempt to manage everything and everything failed, but at least it became clear where to move, but in china, the social rating system has been successfully working for 10 years, distributes abilities to whom, and who needs? a little bit of time was not enough. we would have done it too. well, let's see, we'll find out this question during our program, but i have to see you while the other, and you yourself would like to live under communism. what is the philosophical question? mm, perhaps i would like to, but i don’t like to share so much

that it seems to me that they won’t take me, i have to think about whether i should take it or not. and how did it change? well , after all, communism is, in theory, we probably share everything. but here is how people's attitudes towards private property have changed historically. you can go to the blackboard in more detail. that is, everyone, like me, does not like to share how we used to think about the history of mankind, the marxist model that we are told in school that at first was slavery. it was from ancient times until there about the sixth century bc and later, then came feudalism.

conditionally from about the sixth century until the sixteenth century, in some places until the 19th centuries, then capitalism came. capitalism was again about 16 and up to the present. and finally, socialism. introduced in the 20th century, right? okay, we know. somehow he briefly was yes, yes, well, here we are somewhere here yes, well, according to the research of modern historians. everything, in fact, was not at all like that. well, for example, slavery, we were told that in ancient rome, ancient greece, most people were slaves, and they actually produced everything, according to modern research. even in the city of rome itself, there were 30% of slaves; in general,

slaves in the roman empire. it was less than ten, the same percentage as the all-odd middle ages. less than in the so-called capitalist american state of virginia in the 18th century. there was an even greater percentage of slaves than in ancient rome in the roman empire about feudalism too accordingly, relations, if there were less than 10% of slaves, were basically feudal relations, just as feudal remnants of capitalism still exist today. it is said to have appeared in the 16th century. in fact, there were banks and insurance companies in italy in the thirteenth century. it's just that they weren't called insurance companies by banks, but there was also business lending and fract insurance. one of the most famous assassins of julius caesar, brutus in ancient rome was a typical financial oligarch who

lent money to municipalities. actually capitalism. again, it has always been. yes he was about always, that is, what is socialism as they say now, is there a state share in the economy of about half or more, this is called hospitalism, what is hospitalism when the state owns 100% socialism, that is, there is no clear, no clear boundary between capitalism and socialism. this is the question of dolly the state in the economy. socialism is just one hundred percent hospitalism. that is, which of these i want to emphasize the history of mankind has been much more homogeneous than us. seems like people change much slower than we think, so the relevance remains. as if shakespeare's nothing that dostoevsky wrote a hundred and a half years ago, as it was written yesterday. yes, and it seems that about us and

the attitude to property has not changed either. no matter how the property was, as it remained, well, in the soviet union, the state owned 100% of the private property in the business. was banned. but in everything that did not concern the means of production, the private was banned; the personal was introduced. what is the difference? yes, nothing, nothing how vladimir vysotsky laughed at it in the song, the bespectacled private owner of the green gray white zhiguli what is the difference between the private owner of the zhiguli and the personal owner of the zhiguli ? thanks alexander alexandrovich if the conversation turned to the soviet union well, well, not in the zhiguli so not in the zhiguli but in the soviet union private property. well, whatever it was, she was a person. that, apparently, is why we were the second economy in the world. but no, but seriously, if , for example, honest property would be in in the soviet union we would have been the first economy in the world. well, in fact, if we

remember about socialism, yes, then after all, socialism is only the soviet union well, a lot of other eastern european countries, and if you remember how the economy was arranged in these countries and partly in the soviet union, too, then we had everything - some entrepreneurial elements. yes, well, the same artels. yes, there are miners who can be remembered there in the seventies, for example, even in the eighties it is, if we say medium small business, then hungary poland czech republic it perfectly existed at that time in this sense it is clear that socialism is such a form where yes, uh, in large enterprises, and that means, uh, capital, uh, and means of production. they are in the possession of the state, but at the same time, there are elements of private property, first of all, of course, the private property of citizens, because citizens, as it was said, so to speak, in many films, including. yes they have the right to have money machines. well, and so on. yes in this connection it is clear that no one canceled private property in the soviet union and the transition to

communism. these are some of the stories about what was said from each according to his ability to each according to his need and the key question arises. but actually, what are the needs of each person, they are their own, that is, if you can, so to speak, talk about this, there are different ways for someone and a bowl of soup is a need, but someone needs a yacht and of course, communism suggests that so to speak, they give one a yacht, and the other there is art. well, according to his needs. this is some kind of story about the fact that the basic needs of a person are satisfied. here is first of all. and then the problems began. problems there were already dealt with by political economists. socialism and so on. and this is a very complicated story, which in general, even to most modern economists. well, like me, it's hard to understand, because these are very difficult arguments about what real communism should look like, but the main thing is that we lived in some. this is a society in which private property was still preserved, so this is very important to understand. yes, of course it's a problem. we'll probably

talk again, but in ancient times we'll talk too, yes, but after the ads, ads on ntv exclusive interview with lyubov uspenskaya and her daughter tanya, these family secrets never revealed family secrets, and grandmother knew herself that you would be such a geek, i would have drowned you in the trough of an unhappy marriage. and when it didn’t help me, on the contrary, he killed confidence in me, she was out the window. once wanted throw away. and tanechka screamed and cried. dad tragic fate of his daughter. i was only the enemy of the people who tried to destroy me but were manipulated by my daughter. they just felt like i'd caused her enough grief to say goodbye daughter, but that wasn't the case, of course, and the life that goes on. i learned what happiness is,

i experience happiness, i have the opportunity today to do tanya on saturday at 0.5 on ntv on the air program science and we are a program about how science will change our lives, the next 10 years in 10 years digital communism will come, we will find out, because at the end of the program of our guests, optimists and skeptics will make a forecast of what probability digital communism will really come in 10 years, and our expert professor kapustin argues about the shortcomings of the digital world. in the novel big brother establishes total surveillance and control over the people, but if in the novel every citizen is under the supervision of the authorities with the help of telegrams, then today's authorities have much more opportunities. already in 2011, a system was created taking into account your shopping priorities, most countries today store information about

each of their inhabitants, and the european union, of course, strongly objects to this political views and preferences. but it is also the first to introduce continuous surveillance of all residents. well, it is clear that in connection with the influx of migrants, this is now especially relevant. you see, everything is already invented and thought out by pavel aleksandrovich but , really, why is it important for a person to own something at all? this is mine, this is mine, yes, this is mine this is mine, yes, i will not give it to anyone. it is inherent in the nature of the person himself. but uh, indeed, in my opinion, human nature has a need for possession of some kind of property that is not always material, maybe not of a material nature. all this is clear by the fact that, well, each of us or most of us would still like to be a person, a unique person, not like the other. and here are those things of a property nature. not only those professional knowledge that you individually. could get a person.

they could position us, as if in a team , position us in society. in general, we use such elements of everyday life, as there are cars, it means that there are unique unique apartments there, some household items there. generally. well , let's say stand out in the good sense of the word, and what about? this is confirmed by a huge list of goods that are present on the market today, and a huge list of goods within one segment. when you can choose for every taste and color, and at the same time even order some unique things. there, a suit is sewn to an individual order by marketers. it has long been understood that they are going down this path. for example, when ordering a car, in addition to the basic options. you can also choose additional options to collect, in fact, one that no one else will have. all this makes a person stand out and make him unique. but there is one more main point that i would like to point out. well, possessing in general some kind of property. there again material material character. in general, sooner or late, each person comes to a situation in

which this property has to be parted , and this is not always the case. well, let's say for some good reason it is connected with a new upgrade by buying a new flat car, and sometimes it just acts like an airbag. and the desire to possess and live in such security has such a pillow. in general, let's say a person too. so somewhere at the genetic level. copper, in addition, having the appropriate knowledge and professional skills, a person also comes to of his life to a certain moment when he would like to share them, so that those works that, in general, thanks to which he achieved such knowledge and despondency, were, in general, and therefore, well, given to the new generation to the generation. uh, new scientists, uh, students, graduate students, and so forth, that is, through the procedure mentoring through the procedure. there some teaching lectures and so on. this is very important for a person, indeed, inherent in his nature, we do not like to share things, but we love to share knowledge very much. we love to share. can at least yes i would like to add that yes, uh, the child does not need to be explained what mine is, the child has

to be explained that this is not your ball. not your word. yes? all this is an adult. it is also necessary to explain that this is nothing, yes, yes, one of the first words that children learn, and so that the possession of yes is in us from birth, in addition, people. you take possession of not just something, but more than anyone else. and this is a manifestation of the general universal principle of kiso.