i'm in denial, there is currently no easy way to find a diplomatic solution to how the us is forcing allies to cross red lines. russia must not win this war. can ukraine join the european union with special rights ukraine should be at the center of a new security system in the world and why the west is in no hurry to give kiev any guarantees, the national idea of ​​ukraine is one the central national idea of ​​ukraine is to lie to yourself as many people as possible about this today in our program. hello this is the meeting point at ntv is the place where everything becomes clear. and i'm andrey norkin my colleague ivan trushkin. we are working live very revealing statements. here it is. e of the adviser to the office of the president of ukraine a is an emergency aristovich. there is also a sequel, why you need to lie to yourself and others, because if you tell the truth, everything will collapse. eh, he said, but nonetheless even so outspoken. well, it's

true, he probably said that sometimes i didn't lie. yes, despite such statements. ah, allies. uh, ukrainian they pretend they don't hear in general, western friends of ukraine and also friends and acquaintances of andrei vladimirovich, and they held this video hmm conference, which discussed the next sanctions against us and the supply of weapons ukrainians to andrey vladimirovich i understand that i myself was not present at the meeting, but they know all the details and now tell us all about it. in short, sorry, the americans said that they would supply weapons for 800 million oe, however, in my opinion, they did not decipher what exactly and heavy artillery is one of the points there zelensky’s lists of which he compiled heavy artillery, it seems, as they will, uh, are ready to supply canada to the uk and the germans complained that they had nothing, but it was all over, that is, everything that they had in stocks that they could give away, but this really not the first. well, he proposed to

turn the strengthening of kiev into a long-term goal, since the solution of the situation is diplomatic. the british themselves have blocked the long-term goal of nato should be to strengthen and strengthen ukraine to such a level that russia will never decided to invade again, heavy artillery for ukraine has already been promised by the canadian prime minister trudeau. and here is the german chancellor scholls. he admitted that germany had almost exhausted the volume of military assistance from the available reserves of the bundeslen, while schultz was ready to finance the creation of the necessary for the ukrainians. first of all, ukraine asked germany for anti-tank guns and air defense systems, we can talk about long-range artillery, germany and ukraine are studying a list of weapons that can be supplied by our military-industrial complex. after approval. it will be paid immediately berlin together with our partners in the european union and nato we are absolutely unanimous

in our opinion that russia should not win this war schultz once again repeated the thesis. they are unwilling to take part in military operations in ukraine, but the united states decided to increase the number of its contingent in europe to the already existing 120,000 us military will deploy reinforcements to bulgaria romania slovakia and hungary four more groupings of troops are going to be deployed in poland and the baltic countries reported us representative in estonia brian rorr. at the same time, threats to europe from outside. and according to him practically non-existent. well, it’s nothing , we haven’t missed or missed, nothing, nothing. it’s just that the volume of military assistance is much higher than 800 million, but only the united states provides 800 m 1 billion 300 million. this includes, among other things, the supply of aviation equipment. norway will supply 100 zenith missile systems and so on. i mean,

it's very serious indeed. e military supplies, which, of course, will strengthen, but ukrainian army and on the issue is that, as i just yesterday, it turned out completely that, and that because you don’t find out enough because. and part of these deliveries will go by air, yes, well, well, then they will be transported by us air force aircraft. how will they be directly to ukraine and so on? i understand correctly that this is the first time that the strange aircraft will land now during a special operation at a military maternity hospital. now that's just what we're talking about it's a matter of red lines cause if ah will go, this transfer is already here. uh, vssha weapons, then this, of course, for us already. uh, a completely new situation. e, and. uh, there can be completely unforeseen problems here. for us and for everyone. well, you see, when you say that the

americans are ready to land their plane somewhere on the airfield. i don't know when leo ivan frankovsky and so on. they are aware that this airfield, it can be the target of the russian armed forces and be destroyed, they will recognize. well , you know, he now confessed he found out by accident. yes if e missiles are inflicted, well, yes, on an american military aircraft, they are on an american aircraft. this is directly the problem of the american aircraft, that it was in that zone at that moment, we warned everyone. let them revise vladimir putin's february 24 address. i explained to you all what will happen. in case someone tries to intervene, i would really hate this scenario, because an attack on an american military cargo plane. this is a completely different doubt, in general, being in this very fact, you know, let's assume that e biden tomorrow will be on red square, let's go now to discuss. here, let's take these words on a serious level, or as, in fact, rusty, ready to accept any

aviation, by the way, flights - this is not so, far from the border with ukraine and no one plans to come to the city of lviv or vovan-frankivsk the airport. at the same time, talk about the fact that the americans will come, and this will be a new species. yes, no one will come. if he arrives, then this is a military task of a different level, and everyone knows very well that the nuclear button is cocked and no one is trying to tease russia in this context. and you suppose there you know, so mythical is something speculated on this topic. this means deliveries to polish airports. they go on they didn't end they. they go around the clock plus rail deliveries from germany are on. these are just such military echelons. and in the same way they are railway, and what you say from beginning to end. this is a hoax, i don't understand. where can you see it for yourself? i'm just then we're on the verge of a third world war more or less, why is that unclear? uh, lately, i've

been agreeing more and more, andrey vladimirovich. yes, this is worrying. not well, life is like that. sorry, but this is where i disagree. i can't understand why it's americans? indeed, as volodya said , deliveries are safely carried out through poland , if it is necessary through words, we will not be able to prevent this, why risk them? and? and what do they need it for? so you see, they believe that and so the situation is developing in the right way for them for them the keys. i enjoyed the interview very much. the interesting thing in today's newspaper mont with british minister of the armed forces james happy is very frank and very unpleasant for us, but it allows us to understand, uh, what our opponents are thinking now. they believe that ukraine is winning the war without any of these escalations, that

we are bogged down in the donbass, that we can’t take the fifty-sixth day, mariupol, everything is normal for them anyway, why should they now give us the opportunity to transfer the confrontation to some new level. they are convinced that we i'm going to lose. why is he really, i would like to know something else. not why they are substituted there, something is not substituted for me and no, a couple of words about this interview for a maximum longer. uh, this is the most, because the maximum comrade. i also interview video. i only saw the title i i i smiled, i'll explain to you why, because it would be strange for me, it's good that you read in general, you confirmed absolutely all my thoughts on this score, it would be strange for me if the minister of armaments great britain would tell to its citizens in the newspaper that we are now armed to the side that is actually losing. well , we give weapons there, we supply there what is made there at the expense of british taxpayers. well, maybe

someday some money will ideally be received for this, we send it here so that it all perishes. no dear, the british assure us the minister of armaments. we are sending it there, because our allies, the wonderful ukrainians, howl wonderfully and with these weapons they will even reach voronezh and rostov. i'm in yours, i'm in your retelling and listened to me can i also for me maxim is absolutely understandable, a story, an excellent propaganda story. tomorrow i will read it on a jellyfish e foreign agent to block russia in a brief retelling of the battle sheet. are you interested in me? and then you read everything, you retold the fragment about which he said that this person understands very well what is happening in our armed forces, when he said that a very big problem for the russian military is pride , you understand that we are listening now , there four out of five patriotic experts. they already then the search for borders reach one mp.

you see, it's hard for him to go quietly and quietly win. come on, this is not the history of the law obeyed. and suddenly the headline, firstly, about the pride of a colleague. e of this minister, whose last name i don’t know, the minister of defense, in general, it does n’t really matter to us. and yes, very happy. yes, ben wallis, secretary of defense did. meals here not so long ago i was talking about pride, and i talked about how brilliantly great britain defeated russia during the crimean war. in general, right taking over. uh, the successes that the french army then achieved. this is so to the question about the fact that mariupol is the fifty-sixth day, mariupol is practically already under the control of the armed forces, and russia’s dpr has

only azov left there, so, frankly, no more. eh, i like vanya's opinion, but to analyze it in detail. i don't think it's that interesting. i am interested in something else, if we are talking about problems, and the supply of weapons, which in general, everyone admits alexander means why we should be there now to argue whether an american plane with weapons will arrive, a on ukrainian territory, or it will land on polish territory, a will reload all this into echelons. all this will go and come and get everything there , until when will we allow to receive these weapons on ukrainian territory, that is, this question, to which i personally have no answer yet, communication communications, transport are preserved railways roads . well, for starters, i want to remind you of the fact to this dispute about the plane that last week a plane was shot down in odessa, which

transported weapons it doesn't matter, but it's a fact, it's a fact that shows. what is the fate of the armament of the western, which is translated with the air route, so that part of the discussion is over, with regard to your question. and the question, of course, in general, is not a civilian expert, but more, but i can assume, but communications such as bridges across the dnieper will give, railway junctions and interchanges that civilians do not break, just based on the position of the russian federations as a whole carry. what does civil mean if if you have a plot cottage and where is it? well, well, well, well you don't. but you dream about it. now imagine a situation where some neighbor floods you there. well , i don’t know, his plumbing leaked. and here you are, this is the water that pours and pours and pours and pours and erodes the beds there, the greenhouse has already

collapsed there. well, you just run around with a bucket and cross out this water, you probably need to go there and ask him to block this pipe there. this is a completely peaceful household analogy. this stream goes to us, we go to it, which means there is a bunch. uh, why? i myself here supposed to destroy the first step, zheleznodorozhny ilya no andrey who has the opportunity to this question is very deep. what questions are very important, so after all, we are talking together. in our country, as you say, millions are listening, including the military, decision-makers are recognized, so, of course, as a civilian, i understand that, probably, bomb all the railways and all the bridges. but why should you understand, firstly, this is being done and large railway junctions are being destroyed, but this it is being done, as we say, exactly so that

everything is not necessary, let's block it there, but i don't know the road stations and airfields in western ukraine where it all goes. this means that it is necessary to make sure that these railway stations can not receive the silence that vladimir vladimirovich is talking about at the airport. the airfield could not accept a plane with weapons of civilians . there are no bridges either, but also, which well imagines how it happens with calibers, but destroys, for several thousand kilometers, an iron road. this is just a consumption of calibers. caliber consumption. it will be it will be e. the defeat of the railway line will restore quickly . it is possible to destroy only during the bombing of aircraft, you understand, we cannot send aircraft there. we don't risk. uh, to send our planes even now, so that they are subjected to some kind of, i understand, today the ministry of defense gave us, uh, a slightly modified certificate. they didn't just report. how many specific pieces of equipment

were destroyed there, and they are in percentage terms, so i looked at what, for example, was left there. i believe our ministry of defense left ukraine with only 12 planes. yes, there are children, future aircraft killed. yes, and there will be more there with uh, look at multiple rocket launchers. fire, look. they have air defense. they still have almost half of the supply of these anti-aircraft weapons against air defense, which really have already ended up on the territory of ukraine, but i'm not talking about that. here in general. we are talking about some kind of red line from the outside. e, the west yes , in general, as if trying to figure it out. i do not see any kras here, not because they are to us some kind of red book to push no. she she passes by she. sorry like any real line. it passes through some territory. it runs along the border of western ukraine in my opinion. now, what is happening in the west, firstly, uh, does not consider our military to be self-confident at all, they really understand that the military

is not engaged in, not in a war, but in a special military operation, that is, they are working precisely , preserving the civilian population, conducting operations in the interests of some kind of big global goals, not in order to seize territory. and that makes it even more embarrassing. e strategists e iznata, because they themselves never act like that. they want to understand, has putin already given them western ukraine or not? no, this is the fundamental question now. that's when they understand. now wait until they realize what we really are. if you identify the intention of the whole of ukraine, then i’m afraid that we can get aggression from the nato countries, let’s say a few words about the red lines, because not so long ago a few days ago, mr. biden, commenting on what is happening in ukraine, use the word genocide, there, it seems, as they did under the white house , he played a little, but the european leaders got hooked on this word, they began to ask if

you think they started from this somehow deny? why because if they all say in unison that this is supposedly some kind of genocide, then they said, a will have to speak and b let's see. biden used the word genocide when describing events in ukraine during a speech to farmers in iowa, he explained to them. why should they come to terms with the insane prices for gasoline, which, naturally, on the conscience of putin, the farmers were not too interested in the fate of ukraine. but at the exit of biden, journalists attacked with questions, i had to explain myself, i called it genocide, because it becomes clearer. and it is clearer that putin is trying to erase the very idea of ​​ukrainian proof. we learn more and more and the picture is changing better for lawyers, but for me this is so from biden's definition of genocide. stunned. even the general secretary organization antonio guterish said that only professional lawyers can make such conclusions, the choice of expression was advised, and

emmanuel macron, unexpectedly calling ukrainians and russians fraternal peoples, you need to be more careful in terms. why are the ukrainian people and the russian people fraternal peoples? in this sense, talk about genocide. well, they are fraternal peoples. although what is happening is a madness catch and schulze, who until recently laughed at the idea of ​​genocide in the donbass , was frightened by biden's words. he asked for an american president not to make the ukrainian conflict more evil than it is, but again eastern europe is at a terrible war. and i think it should not be downplayed war crimes are being committed by the american edition of the national review. he explains that the european leaders were not in vain, because if we agree with biden's assessment , then the united states, and with them the allies, should discard half measures and turn on in full. although even all-seeing intelligence is a sphere, but in this case we do not obviously affect the vision of negotiations try because they feel they

they are pushing to what is happening here, this red kind of thing is happening, that is, it rises not as soon as they use the conditional german chancellor. do you agree that there is genocide? guide, uh, how do you buy gas and then you have to act completely, as for the scholz, when putin said during one of his insipid conferences together with the schultz, by the way, the fact that the genocide of the scholz is happening in the donbass also did not agree with this . now i do not agree with the statements. baida on the fact that a genocide is taking place in ukraine of course, genocides. on ukraine is not, russia is not going to destroy the ukrainian people and not have such goals. you and i all understand viktor rzhevsky why all these citizens are not ready to sign this, really intentional steps designed to show the settings the american settings are set to what raises the stakes do not make any concessions and continue to act on the continuation of hostilities in ukraine and without bloodshed russian army. a and, a. weakening of russian positions

additionally. i want to say about. here are ideas about the fact that american military transport aircraft will fly to western ukraine to deliver cargo somewhere else. the americans. there is no purpose of believing. to enter to use their own forces their own troops on ukrainian territory against the russian army, they do not want a direct clash between us russian troops do not want to have stated this repeatedly. indeed, this is so, let's simulate the situation, an american military transport plane is flying somewhere in lviv lutsk or somewhere else somewhere even in western ukraine, let's say. there is always a risk of being shot down, something happens so that what the americans should do next is to send in troops in order to somehow, uh, take revenge, for this some kind of action, again, no, they cannot do it. will they be able to enter into the flight zone, and this is the use of american aviation. and this is, uh, a very high risk of direct clashes. they want this, they don’t want it, moreover,

after the first downed plane they will no longer be able to send, even according to elementary military rules, the second such aircraft provides him with some kind of security, so it is not beneficial for them, and so far they do not intend to. in a direct battle with russia, they will not do this, and until they make such a decision, andrey vladimirovich, it’s just some desire in the minds of some of his kiev subscribers that the americans should enter into this as soon as possible, you will see for yourself. all examples. well, when when soon let's two weeks, you will see this, maybe again your kiev opponents are american planes themselves they will shoot us down, then they will organize us so that the americans are ready to directly enter into a direct clash with the russian clash. this is the supply of weapons, by the way, the american side argues all this with nothing more than well-known, so to speak, international rules. uh oh but why not more like it? and the us plane is shot down in

this case, this is after what i'm talking about. you are the most dangerous consequence. i agree, and there is some kind of planning going on. so the next step. what is the next step is the question useless zone, then what is the question to stop sergey sergeevich, that is, in the vision of andrei vladimirovich, the americans turn out, well, it leaves no other options than the beginning of globalization. i have a completely different opinion about mr. i believe that he consistently purposefully and with a very cold mind is pursuing a policy in the interests of the united states and he is not going to destroy the united states in the garrison of a third nuclear war, but at the same time he is interested in aggravating relations between europe and russia as much as possible. these words about genocide and the atlantic are absolutely everything. it

was unfairly said that perhaps the appearance of a military transport aircraft is possible. by the way, i do not deny this, and there may be certain preconditions for what is being said now, but it will not be american. they'll probably try to do it now. uh, some polish aircraft. why would a polish plane. they are already nearby. here i don’t care that i will fly by plane and beyond ostankino from poland, uh, to ukraine, not by rail. and yes, that's exactly right. probe russia's reaction will be brought down or not brought down. if you knock down, then it can be easily, firstly, it's not a pity. it goes without saying. secondly, it can always be easily said that it was an initiative more and therefore the fifth point e does not work nato does not enter into a nuclear war, but at the same time clashes between russia and poland are already starting, the conflict is reaching the next level. well, here's the last thing i wanted to say. in no case is it possible. e to think

that europe in this situation is exceptionally so poor and suffering that from its bad biden drives, and she is only because of her vassalage , what schultz said schultz said that in no case should russia be allowed to win yes, and they will do everything possible for this. and when they supply weapons. they do not do stupid things, these are weapons. they were created for what, for a war with aliens, or something for a war with russia and russians, and now these weapons are at war with russians and russia, but at the same time, uh, ukrainians control weapons and ukrainians die. so they are very happy. they are also interested in break russia only biden is interested that at the same time europe also burned down, and they are not interested in this. yes, quite right the german leader already said many years ago, russia should not win the result we know. yes i think it will also get the same. the result is a few more words about

red and non-red lines, the definition of labels, and so on. washington is now looking for some reason, how much it is noticeable from publications to recognize russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. cnn talks quite a lot about this. so by according to the tv channel , zelensky himself asked biden to recognize russia as a sponsor of terrorism in a recent telephone conversation earlier, the verkhovna rada adopted a resolution according to which russia was recognized as a sponsor of terrorism, and attributed it to the intention of the russian army to commit genocide of the ukrainian people, as determined by the state department of the united states. sponsor of terrorism. this is a country that has repeatedly supported various acts of international terrorism. now on this list syria iran north korea and cuba the adoption of a law on the possible inclusion of russia on this list will allow the state department to introduce new bans, for example, to deprive all representatives of russia whom they can reach of diplomatic immunity. we

carefully study the facts. we are carefully studying the law, if it is possible by law, if it is effective and appropriate, we recognize russia as a country and a sponsor of terrorism. the fact is that russia did not just launch an invasion, it did not just unleash a war. she started a company of terror campaign cruelty campaign vile aggression against the people of ukraine vladimirovich as far as it can be used to give the ukrainian army absolute carte blanche for any actions not to notice any of its crimes, because it will be so beautiful too. they are at war with terrorism. they are at war with a country sponsoring terrorism. well, the card of terrorism is played repeatedly. this is a question of a financial plan, because i will remind you of the story when akhmetov had breakfast that saved the united states in ukraine and he simply told him your organizations will be recognized as sponsors of terrorism. after what akhmetov stopped financing? that his election campaign

just had breakfast and there is no more money, and this is only in the newspapers as soon as they announce it. e russia , those countries sponsoring terrorism, which means that it will confiscate almost everything that is now frozen, these are different things to freeze and confiscate, and in this respect america is proceeding very systematically. why did europe refuse? uh, support for this idea of ​​genocide is very. just. please remember serbia. it was necessary to defend the alliance then he proclaimed himself. this is a self-proclaimed alliance attack, serbia did not attack anyone, could not include the fifth paragraph, and everyone bombs together, germans and americans, serbia so they can attack. and for this you need to create some kind of precedent, there will always be a very simple all genocide, so we can’t watch, he doesn’t do anything , so we introduce, uh, a certain regime, we start bombing, the biden is doing the same now and europe is resisting. she doesn't want to be engaged in direct confrontation. for two reasons. first reason. this is the incapacity of the european armies alone, that is, germany

understands that there are still 3-4 deliveries, and she will no longer defend herself. uh, the second reason is really the future beneficiary of this economic situation only from the united states of america, this is also understood everything. therefore, the conversation is not aimed in the same way as terrorism europe will be bracketed as long as possible until america is to serbia serbia is not russia when yugoslavia was bombed, they could not answer with anything , so this is all talk about genocide. they will not work, because there hmm, as it were, i hope, i hope, that there , after all, people now understand that we have not bluffed and we are not bluffing now and will not bluff further, because then what are you saying, assets were frozen there. and there. eh, what conflicts there are different things. listen, let's be honest. no one will ever let us down. it 's like it's already been confiscated, so it'll be announced. they are we are a sponsor of terrorism and will be taken away or they will not declare

it to tyan frozen, we will not be able to use it, but to say that there is some kind of change in state sponsors of terrorism. it's much wider covering a huge number of areas out there well. good. you are still there sixth seventh eighth tenth 128. we will still live with these sanctions until the end of our lives.