my ordinary citizens, who also have their own cockroaches , which means that some people are bohemia, they are actors , they are writers, musicians, the second category is businessmen who are now under sanctions, who you need to save money and so on and so on. let's now discuss this in two parts and divide it. but in fact, what to do with these people, and in some regions now, uh, they are already taking the initiative to punish such people for, in general, committed in fact a betrayal, and one of the first is coming, crimea that they offered. actually. this is an initiative of the state council of the republic, it consists in the following, and there a decision was made to deprive state awards, and seven people express anti-russian and russophobic activities for their quote, for example, leonid kravchuk, the former president of ukraine, the ex-governor of sevastopol, sergey kunitsyn

, the current boxers alexander usyk the title of honorary mchanin was taken away from leonid kuchma, also the former president of ukraine well, here is some kind of singer zlata her firebrand. i don't know, here she is a well-deserved artist. she ceased to be her, but she is also a politician. it turns out that she was a deputy of the verkhovna rada. perhaps you will be surprised from the radical party there was such lyashko there, this is how the crimean authorities explain their decision. for us today it is very important here from ourselves. what kind of false heroes will we have to adopt a decision to deprive the crimean awards for discrediting the russian federation and the republic of crimea, a whole group of characters who have taken the side of the enemy, and i have a place among those who work for the good of crimea ensures his safety and well-being. well , to be honest, i don’t really understand how they have worked for the benefit of the crimeans lately. well , i understand some back, yes, they are still inherited. yes, from the crimea as part of ukraine, these are, as

it were, the first. uh, the first swallow. it tells me that someone from the regions will still be there. i think it 's not just about the regions. but look here to explain it all. for example, is it possible to deprive a reward at all? and there is such a general discussion, right? well, you did it, i don’t know, you will save, there you also received there's a medal for that. now it is called differently. by the way, you died for salvation, and then, well, you betrayed your homeland, roughly speaking, carefully you have a medal. of course not. but this fact of this deed is certain. well, because you saved this dead person, after all, when committing a certain kind of crime, a person loses his state. yes, listen andrey, this is exactly what i want to talk about. but, for example, e. you are a well-deserved uh, artist you are a well-deserved artist either way or there people this is public recognition. you are your fact betrayal. you betrayed this society. you betrayed the people. and you are rewards. you must be of that

rank. you should be deprived, like most orders and awards, which, however, does not testify to your fact of personal feat there. yes, you don't understand. it will be very hard to share. why in the first case comrades andrey the fact is that the court does not deprive everyone either. but it is precisely those same orders that are publicly recognized that there is still a certain part in the crimea now in the crimea now very briefly. yes now in crimea there is a lot about poklonskaya. they say. that's in connection with her interview with a new project. echo of moscow called live breasts, i have said more than once about some actresses, yes, but worship, simply. sorry fool. i don’t know if we can then, lord, are a fool and that’s all, because bohemia is always more interesting than. well, to be honest, than about e, it means oleksandr usyk, who is there for loyalty to the duty of certain representatives, bohemians, actors, actresses, singers at the moment after the special operation.

they spoke out somehow, well, anti-state again the operation was condemned. after that, a proposal began even in the state duma, it appeared to deprive the titles of awards of those who now oppose themselves to the state in such a way. the fact that chulpan khamatova left russia and moved to latvia became known a month ago, the actress has since given several interviews last week khamatova was invited to latvian television by the actress. there she spoke about the persecution and threats not according to artists in russia and answered the claims of the presenter, which happened in crimea after 2014 of the year. i was sitting in moscow did not support. well, uh, this was not officially announced, of course, but after the bong, for example, it became obvious to me that we are to blame for this and that we are feeding these separatists who started fighting in the donbass and i will now find out here, to be honest, here for the first time, because not from the ukrainians. no ukrainian friends. hmm, there was nothing like that. i didn't even

remember it right away. yes, yes, i was in the crimea, the latvian journalist did not let up, they say. and what to do with the title of people's artist? i am to be honest, this is never serious. well, that is, this is some kind of nonsense, somehow some kind of soviet, but such is the soviet. well, if they take it away , i'll give it back, as if it's like i don't even know that i don't even know where it is. i don’t know what it gives people’s artist of russia chulpan nailevna khamatova , the name chulpan khamatova has become a symbol of true mercy and indifference. he tirelessly comments on the current situation and another people’s andrey makarevich compares ukrainians with jews, and the operation to protect donbass with a single. myself musician. now in israel, russians are being told

some fairy tales about fascists and nazis, but for some reason civilians have been bombed for a long time; the mass consciousness of people has been preparing for six years to eat no more terrible poison every day through tv. and the lies are incredibly one of the first to condemn russia's actions in ukraine was valery meladze, by the way, also a people's artist appeal in social networks. he published back in february and left russia . although then it seems like he returned, according to the concert director. meladze in november at the artist's a concert is scheduled in kazan and in early april, the singer was noticed at a private party in st. petersburg , for example, he has also known him for a long time. here he is not silent. yes, uh, and accordingly, he lost everything. well, that's how repression works. it's closed right there. that is, valera miladze, who is a favorite artist there, i don’t know all of russia, he is crazy and ukraine, by the way, too. well

, georgia tatyana grigoryevna how do you like this duma initiative is deprived of awards of titles such artists who performed after february 24 have an attitude to this. this is, of course, very disgusting. what i there, here i am, being a people's artist, for me, this is not a trifle, and i went to this. basically, all my life. i'm not not in order not to get this title, but uh, it's all going to that. this is my work - this is. well, it would be strange if, uh, like, well, here, i wouldn't have it. i would have been somehow deprived, probably, but if for people, it means nothing, and if it is more than that, such an attitude. eh, how to what it is generally not necessary. and why do i need you, what does it mean, and what does it mean, and if they got some kind of a large amount of money, because they would be so

easy it would be women, i interrupt you, i have such a materialistic question. isn't there some kind of bonus for the title? she's just like that, i'm sorry. she then lies. if she says she doesn't know what it gives. she, as a folk artist, was supposed to receive additional payments. just money, anyway. the project just wanted you to say this to me, so that our viewers understand this very seriously for the salary. these are big perks. first, you fly business class. here you live in luxury good five-star hotels while on tour. yes, you have a lot of privileges. uh, so chulpan nailevna would not have been on your part. what do you think is more correct, if, for example, an artist, a scoop khamatova, a people's artist, who received the title and awards from the state, when that day and hour came and her position from the position of the state diverged cardinally, it would not be fair for

the artist herself to say i return these awards i refuse titles, because we parted ways with the state. it happens. it would be fair. how are you believe, i believe yes, take away somehow giving back. this is somehow incomprehensible. give him his toys. mine, so to speak, and that's it. it's a little kindergarten. and disgustingly you sink to this level. give back. well, i would probably, god forbid, of course, be somewhere not in russia, but i would, of course, give it away. i apologized for the question. in general, the same would not be more moral to refuse themselves. well, you know that this is certainly the personal position of each person here after her words. in general, i kind of thought about if she has a conscience, how such, yes, but firstly, in the very name of the people's artist. everything is enclosed. yes, that is, this is the recognition of the people and the response, including respect for the people, as such, when an

artist is sitting, i don’t understand why i need it here, and then pathetically enters the kremlin, as if we see it. uh, how it looked before respectively, but it's pure water? she didn't know anything. now she knows everything, she can say whatever she wants. well, if that's why the question is such a state, then the state should be a person. she thanked, including, uh, some such, well, with moral or something, strange your position, when designate? yes, i think that here you need to understand, er, at this point in time. after a person has left the country, does the privilege continue to operate , if the privileges continue to operate then it is necessary to unconditionally restrict, but to take it back from the point of view of purely saying such a moral act, i would not, why because is it right? you say it allows. uh, the state to the level, but such pettiness. e the same person. why? if the states you

do you think that the title of people's artist is for you from the state? well, of course, or from the audience, it's just necessary here. so this title is not for the audience to argue. yes, i heard the argument that it is not the state that gives me, but the audience rewards me so from the point of view. again, some mercantile interests. does it give uh, and now i have to relate to this already gives me more money, i understand, first of all. it 's honorably good. i saw that, uh, in one hiv like this , right there with the head. well, just a second. now we will finish you off, perhaps, finally petrovna's film. you come out with such a legislative initiative, if i understand correctly, but not by law. and as i, firstly, i would like to say nothing about politics here, probably, as ordinary people who admire talents, and whose people we just watched on tv. and to begin with, i would like to say, i am from the rostov region and live there and my district, from which i chose to confine myself to the lpr. dpr from my house to the border with the

lugansk region is less than 60 km. and here in this the situation that we are now discussing. yes, i've been here since 2014. i see the refugees keep seeing the stars that have been coming to the refugees since 1914 . i saw yulia chicherin and i saw others who came and helped, people who were bombed by none of these people. i have not seen and when you know idols. they are for love. here you love their talent. he is your idol. you are everything to you and you want to be with him in love. oh, in joy, and in sorrow. and here is a difficult situation. those people say, these people say, wait wait you you can see for yourself, you stay here yourself, and you left and create and there will be no such problem. we are all fans of talents and idols, it turns out that now you want these idols, yes, not erupt. here they are disappointed in their civilian. let's have them, i expressed my opinion about the cultural figures who left and badly tell him. i

received hundreds of comments from ordinary residents of our citizens of our country, who began to say much more radical things. they, otherwise i just looked like a deputy. how about what is it possible to decide a person gost awards or premiums? no, it’s impossible, it’s possible only in one case, if he committed a serious criminal offense , it’s no longer possible, but in my understanding, i agree that the state award is the order of merit for the fatherland, the title of people’s artist. this is the ideological component of this recognition of talent. and not only on paper and not only at the expense of benefits, this is public recognition. and if a person betrayed me, but i would really like him to understand this too, that he is behaving incorrectly not very spectators. i don't need to watch the beginnings of punk anymore. i’m a second, after all, she says, i understood everything in the fourteenth year, i’m

not with the country and we see footage of 2015, where she goes to the president, but you understand, yes, it’s so quiet in this story, i didn’t agree with the sound, yes, and therefore i will explain why well, firstly , regarding state awards. i don't know any . but the artist of the union of soviet socialist republics who would refuse this title. this time. although, the country no longer exists a path to all kinds of housing improvements there are no conditions for the opportunity to pay off you one step, chulpan khamatologist does not directly act. yes, wait. yes, you know, you know, a city man was awarded the order of merit to transfer the fatherland. after a while, the man says the spit. i am the fatherland yes, the fatherland, yes, it has the right to take this cake from him and, accordingly, he has the privileges of a part of

the people of the people. no what does what we just showed here mean, maybe this was not said, but in general, andrei vladimirovich has other statements, by the way, in my opinion, out of service to the fatherland. listen, what is there to say? yes, i would now be in this period when everything is on emotions. some offer to take away the title , others are going to almost refuse, while he calmed down and exhaled, because, it turns out, as long as no one is going to go to the fishermen conditionally and will ban zakhar prilepin, we will support. i think that so far the fishermen are not given power. he will ban all remaining members of the apple party and he will have no one to come to power with, because they clean their ranks there cleaner, excuse me, they clean cleaner, so you pulled your hand there, when i had the name of petrushevskaya, you happily washed down something. do you remember, when she refused state awards, she was told, she said about the award, in my opinion, i return it. yes, well, this is state-owned, yes, but there, by the way, there is no mechanism. they said that there is no mechanism, but

initially. she couldn't say it after some years. this, of course, is good, but initially , if it is like that, i try to be regulated. as a result, they didn’t take her back, because they said that there is no mechanism, what is happening now, but it is possible. another week would have passed and a wave would have arisen when chulpan khamatova and that means lady hidzhakova and many others would themselves refuse, so it is very important to offer to deprive them of their awards, as we have blocked. some social networks, before they block us , you understand, it’s me who is leaving you, and not you, it ’s just that they don’t refuse me. here is. you probably know about her, except for her last name, i don’t know anything. e creative julia aug. here. i know that she swears a lot and speaks very actively on political topics. that's what i know, like what kind of actress she doesn't know

empresses very well, by the way, so they mean, look, she left some time ago. uh, history, right? well, where are you the baltic country. here i performed there again, because people send me. i also read like this. i had fun thinking about suddenly i find out that she is coming to moscow because she will play a performance here, as in the stanislavsky electrotheatre, i won’t lie know. you recognize him. in the end. this performance was canceled so delicately for technical reasons, the story is what yerevanevich is like. there, not only did you find out about it, but also, for example, aleksandrovich einstein, who turned, so to speak, to the supervising issue was canceled for technical reasons. this is a different issue. why because why the front to the fact that there khinshtein, uh, conducted some kind of investigation. thank him for what he does. she refuses nothing. and she comes back here, what are her statuses in order to be here

to earn, you see, we are talking about people's artists, a people's artist legitimizes the recognition of the public. therefore, if now someone wants to take something away from these artists, they need to be legitimized. this is including through the public , they are only through the decision of the authorities. i will give it was a brush, namely the law according to i will give one such example many, many years ago, the composer beethoven decided to dedicate his third symphony to the emperor, then not yet the emperor napoleon, and then napoleon declares himself a monarch beethoven in anger, crosses out the title page and removes the dedication of napoleon, we know about it. i know about this, it’s like the events of history, but we don’t know how napoleon reacted to dimash beethoven. here the artists can speak they have much more maneuvers and in general they are allowed words. but being napoleon, it’s useless to react to beethoven and contemporaries, but it seems to me that if

every composer were a beethovend, every singer would be a scammer, and we will find out that every rice by tatyana vasilyeva agreed about the artists and you say, wait a second now there, in which it has just become a maneuver. now we are talking less about ukrainian citizens, who we have such ukrainians, right? yes, we have here, uh, earning. actually, quite a lot of money is also representatives of bohemia, so it became the day before. it is known that several dozen ukrainian celebrities at once. banned. entry into our country was banned for 50 years. the complete list is published by the izvestia newspapers in this list, leading eagle and tails. anton ptushkin andrey bednyakov nikolay serga also leading the world inside out dmitry komarov. in addition, musicians alexei potapenko and anastasia kamenskikh svetlana loboda dmitry monatik svyatoslav vakarchuk andrey danilka and actress mila sivatskaya will no longer be able to enter russia. all these stars have previously criticized russia, well, of course, for what

reason for the special operation in ukraine. this is a war for you to be afraid, this is a war for you, so that you have nothing to compare almost the entire free world with. condemned this war. even neutral switzerland, which is generally an unprecedented case for a whole generation russians. in the need to never again go beyond the borders of russia, a whole generation of russians will live with the stigma of this war. you may not realize it now, but it will, because this is not a war of liberation. she is predatory and criminal tatyana grigorievna, we often said in the studio that the artists and that valery is a sheep. today it is partly said that they are such emotional people as artists. they are easy to pick up. one day is not like the previous one. well, that is, what they did on emotions, as if, if you accept this position, do we need these ukrainian comrades, who, in general, are not our comrades, should be punished for this. you need emotions here at all, it's not about that, history and emotions. we are on stage, please, as much as you want, and here i

perceive it. it's just like a personal insult , they insult me ​​all the time. they show me that i'm not on the same level as a russian? well, what am i going to tell? still , it's understandable. this is, uh, how can you explain it then, what exactly is in the creative environment? well maybe it’s just that we are all actors, as if we know, you are in full view and we pay attention to this. well, there are so many people here who allow themselves such public statements, some comments at all. well, i think that it’s not even a matter of the mind, not of stupidity, but that apparently they have some bad dividends from this, they definitely have the same boorish one. this is visible. everything is how she came to this studio and it dawned on her how she should now live. and what should she say in order for her to get settled there, to work, so as not to leave the profession, so as not to be driven from there with a filthy broom from there. they

wouldn’t drive this people’s artist so that i could do it instantly instantly. here are all these faces that look at us with contempt, which they call names. e that we are not people, that we, i will not also speak obscenely, as they say about us, representatives, bohemia i just remember your interviews with state duty. and you recalled there, if i remember correctly josephalgauz, with which you have certain contradictions, including on the ideological parts. if it's so rude to say, and you're somehow meeting or maybe intersecting. eh, you discuss it with him or not with him. or maybe with someone with whom you have a conflict, how does it look like? or do you try in the acting environment in general for these, do not touch on this, because this can lead to mutual there. throwing stools at each other. yes, it can be like this, there can be such an ending in a relationship, but i'm not interested in such endings. uh, there's a director that i

'm working with that i'm interested in, and we're doing good performances, but i know that joseph is extremely e applies. well, on the contrary, let's say. to my attitude completely we do not coincide with him, and we start a terrible terrible skirmish. and we need to stop in time, which is what we actually do. we do not touch this topic. i know that he has a. well , i can’t accept this position, i can’t and will never accept it, just like him, he is very emotional. he's just scared of him because of him. it seems to me that he will die when he begins to prove the opposite to me if the reichelgauz speaks in the same way as they did. here are those whom we have now called these mugs, you will also mug him, rank them, or you will have a different attitude due to a long acquaintance, good question e, spinning, i will list it and have already listed it. but this does not mean that i will not

work with him and make a performance, what does it mean? we'll just never touch it. i don't respect his position. still, you know how to separate professional people from the need for personal communication. you know the same. excuse me please, maybe i'll say now what like this has nothing to do with our meeting. but, most likely, i went to inspections that minuses. yeah, i went to the play karbaus. and here, and i watched, i really don’t like it, but there were full halls, it was just complete worship before these greatest directors. i have watched. a performance about tolstoy, where tolstoy is just a goat and a freak tolstoy and the whole family were just waiting for him to die, and then they sit down at the end of the performance to eat borscht, and everything is fine. is that what i was watching eugene onegin who sits in the corner and all the time spiteful and bilious person. this is eugene onegin,

if our guys, who haven’t read very much now , it’s possible, uh, one or the other and they will come to watch these performances, what are they, they will understand there. well, what is it, that's why you ask me, i don't have an answer, there are no questions, it's just that this is a long-standing story, which, it seemed to me, began to somehow come to naught. bam, oleg kulik brings his monster parody to his mother's homeland. you may have heard from the scandal in gostiny dvor. this is what it is and it really is enjoys. here i am, uh, subsided, yes, that is, for one second the most interesting thing is that the same minus is here. well, i heard. this hmm rocket at the kremlin there in moscow and he says, well, as it goes, most likely, i will return, who will let them in here. you know, in general, amazingly, we have already managed to paste these labels, which actually have absolutely legal, uh, meaning. what does traitor mean? eh, it's not entirely clear to me. yes?

let me mean that in the criminal code there is an article for treason, there are certain facts, when you got something there really passed on secret information and so on. we, then, have already called everyone a traitor, who is a traitor here, the term mug was introduced, yes, after the term of legends such andreyevich sounded, i once again understandably disgusting weapon, as they say in the case of some artist, of course, it is better to remain silent. well, it doesn’t agree, it’s silent, if no one pulls by the tongue, they want to drag it away by the tongue, whoever ran into her , this is the host, so to speak. but i leave it to my conscience. i don't agree with her. when you come to us here, i have professional duties to pull you a statement, it does not need to be restored. first, betrayal. there is a legal side. yes, none of them was a court , and none of them was called a traitor. this is the first

second constitution of the russian federation, and here, uh, the deputy, of course, must confirm my point of view. uh, guarantees freedom of opinion and freedom of conscience. and if in this case, we let's go further and consider the position to the actions of the authorities, not in this particular situation not in relation to the military special operation, but in relation to the pension reform, for example, in force. but should all artists advocate for pension reform, if the state and the authorities have made this decision. and if you do not agree with this pension reform, when he is in the military, pirate again. listen again, the authorities make a decision, and my e right, as a citizen, evaluate this decision again whether it meets my standards of conscience in the coordinate system

that i live or does not meet. and you say all anyone. let's interfere again, which we listened to, when there are a huge number of debatable issues. and you pony once again a huge number of players. how did you get started right away? and because i'm right. i am absolutely not. aleksey genna doesn't always turn on when you're right. sometimes they get turned on when they're hearing, because i'm telling the truth, i don't stand in any pair. that is, you want to say that alexey gennadievich is different from everyone else present in the studio today. they say i'm lying, as they say, if everything those present will be consistent, then they will have to recognize that one must agree with any actions people that i manage to do with this

chorus. now you know how i made it burn, so to speak. that's what should be screaming. let's give it to you after a pause. yes, just like that go-ahead. halva just one card for everything everyone absolutely conquered such a light. we were brought today simply incredible it was impossible to stop smiling mask, the decisive semi-final on sunday at 20:40 on ntv police brotherhood premiere today at 20:00 on ntv new models of casual shoes.