they put on a map in ukrainian indicating eighteen potential targets, the publication's experts called the choice of targets natural, because oil depots help supply russian military equipment with fuel, it does not lag behind forbes and cnn michaeling. i'll show you. here we see, belgorod is even further away there are bases in voronezh and kursk, this is still approximately 200 km deep into russia, how ukraine could show its increased power, combat capability and access range western officials are also active, especially the british are trying. there, ukrainian strikes on objects in russia are justified in everything, the hammer will disrupt the supply chains. and in general, in war, all means. good in war. ukraine has the right to strike to attack its logistical lines of fuel supplies. frets

of ammunition are part of the war, and the british minister of defense went even further and announced her readiness to supply ukrainians with weapons to destroy the russian fleet. in the black sea, the next 2 weeks are critical now is not the time to talk about how to help ukraine defend itself. if we put everything on pause and russia mobilizes moscow can gain a foothold in ukraine for a long time and we can all be in great danger. so one small addition. before we move on again, to the discussion on the eve of vladimir putin spoke before the council of legislators, but the federal assembly. here he raised this topic there and issued such a warning to everyone who wanted to intervene in the events. i will emphasize again if someone intends to interfere in the ongoing events from the outside. then they should know, yes, and they will create for russia unacceptable for us

strategic threat. they must know that our response to counter strikes will be lightning fast. we have all the tools for this that no one can boast of now. and we won't brag, we 'll use them if necessary. well, here's a fragment from the speech of the president of the western press. naturally accepted. as there is another proof of escalation on our part. although we, in my opinion, are responding to the escalation from the other side. abbas or am i wrong. and well, look, first of all, it's not a threat. this is a warning. secondly, the third party, about which putin e speaks, is not going to interfere. i'm teasing for now. yes, i see so far, only incitement and this is meanness on the part of the british, well, weapons, yes, we will hit weapons, this is logical and we talked about it at all levels,

there, it turns out we will give you weapons, and you will always use it. . well , look, there is cancer, syria is there, afghanistan before that. you always give up weapons as soon as the american creatures are attacked by those to whom the americans supply weapons. uh-huh. or something happens to them, the americans themselves do not interfere. and then the biggest qur'an what are you talking about was not once again they do not interfere themselves. but they don't go. here the syrian kurds were flooded with weapons, as soon as the turks, uh, ganged up on them, what did the americans answer. wait syrian chords. come on, yes, i think it’s a big meanness on the part of the british, to incite not to collect, while answering their own heads. look you are talking the americans do not intervene at the moment when some kind of

military action is taking place. an american reconnaissance aircraft is flying from europe. this is non-intervention. this is interference. it's a direct sound interference, so we can't say here that they're in the country live. and what did putin say alexander yuryevich putin said about strategic threats. it is, in fact, actually it is a term. it is putin who does not use journalistic language. e he is a lawyer and always based on terms. even when he talks about lightning. answer no one in the west e did not take it, because the talk about a nuclear strike, because, well, these are journalists. here is a strategic threat. the level is also not the most i will say now that there is no the most important issue today, which well, we are not discussing, it is being discussed behind closed doors. where is the border when we define the participation of the west in the events in ukraine as

interference now in an obvious way, we we do not determine as long as these are arms deliveries. it doesn't count yet. quite right. that is, there should be. there goes further gradation. a. let's try to help you bring. uh, the ship's missiles are the speeches of the head of the mead of the british track sheet. uh-huh, and there are six of them, or what? here is a you choose then. that's what of these crises let there be that's such a strategic threat. i'm just right here means the first russian troops. during the war, they should be expelled, including from the crimea and the donbass republics. this is the second in ukraine. this is a total war. since the victory of ukraine is a strategic imperative. for all of us, the third is heavy weapons. tanks and planes need to look deeper, we need to increase production of the fourth in our reserves. it is necessary to use all available economic levers to oust russia from

western markets. fifth. the west should help build up the defense capabilities of moldova and georgia, and sixth, it should deprive president putin of the opportunity to declare his victory in ukraine to use this war as a catalyst for establishing a new world order. there is not a single word of british intervention in this conflict, especially the creation of a strategic threat, it is all about ukraine and about providing assistance remotely. look in order to achieve the goals that britain needs to achieve by proxy. yes, i understand, there is no direct intervention. see. this is a story that lasts for many, many decades and most of the military trained literate military. i can't say that about the streets, well, its ledge, literate military in this paradigm still think it is the doctrine of deterrence. uh-huh, the concept of limited war is nothing. that is, the competent military at headquarters still consider the

current situation in ukraine within the framework of the concept of nuclear deterrence and limited war. if that's why i say, the main thing is the border, where the red line is somewhere. ok then. explain to me where it's different can you tell? what do you think this is just i can assume, that is, that the approach to this red line. eh, that is to step on it is in ukraine there is heavy weapons with a nato crew, not only. and if his heavy weapons are not only ukrainians before that. one more moment. they say that several hundred aircraft should appear there, which will not, so to speak, fight on the territory of the pilots. no, it doesn't matter, but even if the very fact of actions appears, let's say the airfield of polish airfields well, from these aircraft. in our territory, yes, this is already a factor in the participation of poland in the war, which they have, they are not

based in ukraine. no, they are not based. yes, a if fighting is opposed in ukraine. that is, if there are military battles with poland, yes, that they are red, so there are no questions about it, it means that ukraine’s strikes on russian territory means that i want to say, generally speaking, i don’t see anything criminal here. these are not terrorist acts. these are completely legal actions on the part of the armed forces of ukraine. that's the fact that they could not and did not do this before. this this was due to a large extent to the fact that, firstly, apparently, there was no complete information received by the united states where, in general, it is expedient to delete, and secondly, uh, apparently. so wait. i'll stop right now. so, it means that there was no information coming from the united states; now we know that such information exists, because there is a special map indicating the targets on the body of the russian territory in ukrainian. wait cards, as i understand it , received from the american. nowhere is this an interfering

fact of introduction. yes, participation in hostilities. no, no, no, no, some americans. that's what yes i am i ask. no, convince me further the simple thing, er, there was the vietnam war. we didn't say that we are at war with the usa, we shot down 5,800 american planes there in this vietnam war by our famous vietnamese. yes, that the korean war of the fifty-third year was further, that how much we had, we supplied weapons, even ours participated. there are many thieves in the israeli wars, where to participate? i had a friend, he was not in the usa, so there are no questions here. here the matter is different. that's where the line is when we say. e taste. on purpose, but the connection of the united states of america to europe or someone else

there on the same howitzers, two or three. you can judge for a long time. yes, wait for this, if if, god forbid, of course, this is the line that you represent here and and i don’t yet. it will be translated our response to nato infrastructure facilities so, if more so, the first thing that should have followed in this case, after diplomatic curtsy began with such facilities on the territory of ukraine, is stop. if we say is located, you see, and then it will not switch to this red, if there is an airfield located on the territory of a nato country with which aviation operates against ukrainian aviation on the territory of e, then ukraine is against our troops. so the first thing that will happen after all the type of diplomatic reverses is a blow, therefore, an airfield. yes, this is accuracy. this is what konstantin vasiliev ramms is talking about now, if you look again at their western publications, the statements of politicians, they generally understand this,

maybe they don’t always say it, but they are afraid let's take a look at these possibilities. well, no goals, no goals, but here are the points, for which they are more afraid, let's see, yes, the german edition of the compact writes that a big conflict between russia and nato could begin as early as may, when active deliveries begin to ukraine, promised heavy weapons with a trigger, as i believe, analytical buildings, could be a blow to hubs in poland where these weapons will be collected for further shipment. what has been supplied so far has been easy to hide anti-aircraft missiles, such as stingers fit in the trunk of a car, and machine guns can be hidden in a wagon with humanitarian aid, but tanks with heavy artillery. everything is much more complicated, military tactics suggest that russian troops destroy these things even in the process of transportation, accompanying nato personnel may die or a border crossing in poland may be blown up in addition to the polish city of rzeszow, which nato uses as a hub for the transfer of mercenaries and weapons to

ukraine more one military target was suggested by the minister defense of great britain ben wales is the military airbase of mikhail kogalychanu of romania, it was used for a long time as a transit point for operations in afghanistan, but not so long ago it was repurposed for nato operations in the black sea, according to some reports, nato planes take off from there scouts coordinating the actions of the ukrainian armed forces along with support ukraine, we support nato's collective defense capability in the short and long term. we attach special importance to the eastern flank, we increased our presence in the sky by sending typhoon fighters to romania this means that we have the ability and instant response to support the operations of the alliance , the rammstein base can play a special role in addition to being the main stronghold of the us air force in europe - this is also the largest nato logistics complex, it is involved in conducting reconnaissance and delivering goods to kiev, germany, according to reuters, has

signed up to supply kiev with heavy weapons , they will carry on the principle of circular deliveries, hiding behind eastern european partners, although germany continues to assure that it will not be a party to the conflict. i have made it very clear that we will not be a party to the conflict. sometimes at 3:00 am. you wake up and think, god, why can't we ensure the safety of the sky, and in a minute you understand, then we would become a party to the conflict making such decisions all the time. this is my responsibility, according to the oath that i took here. in the danish press, in case of an aggravation , they remembered the danger of the seizure of russia by the suvolk the corridor of the way to kaliningrad through lithuania and poland , according to the forecasts of the american analytical center for rent, if it were occupied by russian troops. estonia latvia and lithuania would suddenly be cut off from other nato countries in the west, we believe that the history of this dead past and the distant suwalki corridor raises a question. will washington respond with anything other than loud protests

if russia divides nato into two parts with one unexpected nighttime maneuver, the german press itself names the possible targets that could become it is really the goal to be subjected to some kind of our blow if they themselves perfectly understand that they are walking along the red lines, that the red lines, in fact, are not one red line. a number of them have red lines. we e, which means that any action it gives rise to, in principle, an equal reaction. if the west is now in the present or in the near future, it will also be set on the absolute defeat of russia in ukraine and will be ready to take risky steps to achieve this goal. what steps might these be? for example, organization of the blockade of the leningrad region? this is one step use of the romanian army. only volunteers of some army army itself to destabilize or somehow capture transnistria is another potential step, uh, and direct inclusion. yes

, in some kind of confrontation with the russian peacekeeping contingent. there, the use of polish troops, for example, in western ukraine or in some other parts of the country, in opposition to russia, all these steps and a number of others will lead to opposition from russia already at a completely different level in russia there is russia has uh, strategy. it's called escalation for the sake of discolation. here it is just for the sake of such events and was, uh, conceived what it is. this implies that if the enemy in this case is the nato countries, the entire nato military bloc is ready to go ahead, create existential threats, threaten the existence of the russian federation , then russia is ready. in this case, use the weapon in such a way and in such a way, to cool the enemy down, so that the enemy understands that this is the last opportunity to stop here now, because if you don’t stop in this moment, the irreparable will happen between

russia and the united states, as you think, viktorovich, the concentration of heavy weapons. you are somewhere in the zheva region with the approval of the government of the nato countries sending to this city the so-called volunteers a. maybe nato servicemen who, yes, they cross the border with ukraine, but are there and are with clear goals, this can become. uh, the trigger is on the trigger, that is, no, so for now. they are standing there. i don't think so, but if nato forces themselves are used for their delivery to ukraine, these forces must also be subjected to. here. eh, let's put it this way , fire will behave on them, and they will somehow respond. yes , this can create the prerequisites for a new caribbean crisis. i remind you that the caribbean crisis. in fact, it began, with which the americans deployed medium-range missiles in turkey, these missiles threatened directly the south of the ussr. beyond the caucasus, armenia, georgia, the south of there regions in the southern regions of the rsfsr, and in response to this, the ussr took

appropriate actions to deploy missiles in cuba in the end. uh, the leaders of the two kennedy countries and khrushchev agreed the soviet union does not deploy missiles near the us withdraws them and on the other hand, the united states is very quiet. they did not tell their own population about this during the silent collapse of the ussr was expelled. we really are. we can approach in the coming months . there are a number of reasons that can lead us to this. yes, we may be witnessing a new new form in the cuban missile crisis. dmitry viktorovich well, i just wanted to say that in the end the caribbean crisis somehow led to peace, it turns out we were so long-term peace resolution. our problem was solved by the americans. had to take your threat missiles out on the planet. if we treat the very concept of a crisis there from a medical point of view, then yes, after this fracture you or you recover, as it was impossible before

about this situation. i just wanted to add, but this is actually what the brit said, open secret. uh, the same flight radar constantly needs to determine three weeks shows how rammstein is like with britain. here they go to romania is coming in our e, c-17 and 130 aircraft, that is, a continuous flow of two fuel tankers, three somewhere on the average reconnaissance aircraft, one constantly swedish, by the way, sweden is wrong with us, like a country. yes, here he is constantly hanging from their side. that is, this flow of cargo flows continuously. they go in transponders with nothing to hide. if we know all this business, what is there. i drank, i also think he knows the question is precisely the red lines. e. well, i don’t know what’s in the head of the supreme chief commander where he will draw this red line and i am afraid that this is not known in the west, and to some extent they already have a certain panic, because they have already crossed a lot. they don't know what they've crossed. what will be the answer, therefore, judging by the statement, they sometimes have some kind of panic stanislav ollegch. eh, that's it, ivan

sergeevich looked very sad. i listened to the last story, what victor said, i had such an idea, how wild we all have become over the past 2 months with a little more than two months. if i alone answered it would be half the trouble, that's all wild. you know when we waited there for 2 months, they will disconnect us from swift and there whether some company from russia will leave or not, and so somehow half-death. we have discussed this now , we are discussing whether it is a clash between russia and nato or some kind of nuclear variable. and we are already talking about the fact that this is, in general, not some kind of prospect that everyone is praying that they do not happen, but already somehow let's discuss what will happen in this, that we first discussed some abnormal discuss things calmly, not them, but because it takes two to tango. sorry please. so, what is next? so maybe they are wild. we have been for a long time. well, let's get started. maybe i woke up, finally. this is very bad.

awakening is important. you can still think, as returning, here we are used to the fact that we perceive the west as such hypocritical people, and when there are some western leaders or military figures there, they say cynically. that is, they say it like it is. can ukraine hit any targets in russia in the context of the conflict? can we somehow perceive that see finally, they opened. eh, so to speak, my true face. well, this is cynicism, people behave hypocritically and lie, impudent. well, we've given you some examples . i how should handle er, perceive then from the statement. that is, when actually pronouncing without hypocrisy, then we begin to somehow continue to understand? well, i hope maybe you can tell me or find the logic of the actions of western leaders now, after all, they have completely dulled the feeling of any danger, it seems to them that they are in a kind of soap bubble and that's it, that they are now doing everything in ukraine that they

are trying to build against us, as if it does not concern them. well, does this really concern the years of this prosperity of the european union, they are so gone. these banal human primitive feelings that they are ready to really unleash a war with russia now. well, i heard a lot of opinions here and somehow all my colleagues got away from this, that they are now a party to the conflict. they are not just a side, they are involved in this conflict, 2/3 of europe, all of north america is mercenaries, this is technologies. it’s even elon musk, his mother, this weaponry, including heavy weapons, even a tiny peacekeeper mokron, supplies artillery mounts that can completely destroy half of the belgorod region there, and so on. we somehow close our eyes to this. and what are we afraid of in the west, no one hides anything and no one.

we recognize parity in military defense, we recognize and respected, and we never pretend to be ourselves. here, uh, some very yes, too strong, ready to strike first. yes, that's a big mistake to recognize the opposite reasons for the war, with regard to

participation participation, is different. i can stab. maybe take a little. well, i can stab. and i can give a knife to a friend. here, yes, my enemy lives there, go. yes, i'm guilty, and i participated, i'm participating, and but, yes, this is the site, but the one on whom the attempt is made has the right to force the attacker, but does not have the right, then find the customers will run away as soon as it should be me and hit . well done round if you give the knife it’s one thing, if these guns are here, then you can come to you, then they will come. and you will become an employee of this man cannot be shot. here's the man who attacked with a gun friends by law ca n't find me. yes, defending myself, i can shoot the one who came to me with a gun. well, i can't then take his gun and go look for orders. it's not.

it is he of the russian federation can find the court now very much and so on. here i am an example, for example, i wrote what is the direct part, what is the indirect and sanctions against one and the other different though everyone is involved group time let's have this legislative discussion. let's continue in a few minutes so we twist it in the other direction, that they said time is up. do not miss the central television of pridnestrovie declared a red level of terrorist threat, but who and why is blowing up the situation in this heavenly republic? who owns the information owns the world. is elon musk, who bought the social network, wants to become the future president of the united states or the eccentric billionaire, decided to take a swing at something more palm oil. now an unaffordable luxury, the people of all countries demanded to

ban it, but it just ended. and now what? why the dream of fans of a healthy lifestyle can turn into a food apocalypse for the entire planet. this will be your central television on saturday at 19:00 on ntv mask for the anniversary of philip kirkorov april 30 at 20:15 on ntv stay energetic, bright and self-confident vitaser is an easily accessible iron and vitamins for its better assimilation vitafer. be on the rise and in these days put the house clean and tidy without unnecessary hassle and do not forget to take time for yourself, meet spring beautifully. buy tokam motor oil on wildberries in continuous motion with full return. this is how the engine should work, such a hole, original japanese quality for your car, when a sharp pain makes you climb on the wall, like sanal in a big red package rushes to your aid the staff is charged against

pain the magnet takes care of you and offers discounts on your favorite products discounts up to 40% on coffee berries magnet. time passes, but the joints remain in great shape revolutionary composition for joints with new generation collagen. art neo. let the joints remain young dinosaur, the new season from may 4 at 20:00 on ntv, the imperial mint presents a medal in honor of the 140th anniversary of the birth of the matrona of moscow, illuminated during the solemn ceremony, patron saints play an important role in our lives and matrona is one of the most famous matrona nikonov was born blind with a birthmark in the form. christ's mother wanted to give the girl to shelter, but when she saw a white room in a dream, she decided that this was a divine sign and left her daughter in the family all her

life. matrona received people, healed them and helped with advice. today. each of us needs such a holy patron and this medal is a real gift for the russians - a medal for you. absolutely free of charge, you only pay for packaging and shipping. call the toll-free number or go to the matron.rf medal. order now and receive an illuminated face medal. mothers, protect yourself and your loved ones. may all day on ntv, where we have the authority of legend, our favorite tv series came to its fullest, the dinosaur

concept of justice and fables to catch thieves. no matter how the monkey ends again, it remains only to develop an implementation plan, a dinosaur, a new season. you again fit together from may 4 at 20:00 on ntv there will be no need to deal with six thousand people around putin as navalny's companions began compiling execution lists by order from the west. you russians, you are the aggressors, get out of here. what to do with those who changed their minds and decided to return to russia, i say which it specialist would choose to go to moscow and why the rushing sergey lazarev was pecked by his own colleagues in the shop, now they all showed their true colors about this

right now. this is the meeting place on ntv, the place where everything becomes clear, and we continue. so i said about the legislative discussion, which means that these are the laws we should have in this difficult time. i'm not talking about military laws. that's what we said. according to what law can we carry out such a military action there. no, i'm talking about how would be quite peaceful and our life is here by you twice. well , it seemed to me, a stopped galina mikhailovna just a step away, but from the article. it seemed to me already for the red twice became. so, twice galina mikhailovna made a statement that, in principle, can be interpreted, if desired, as a violation of the law of existing ones. so i am absolutely sure that many of you dear viewers. and you also felt this, and now

you will joyfully demand this in order to call gallit mikhailovna to account. galina mikhailovna is not alone in our country, does this mean that people like galina mikhailovna do not have the right to their own statements, these are the law. they have no right to violate. this is an obvious story, but there is simply a risk that we will expand this and all this. here is this circle although it seems to me that there is no other way out. this is probably because under these conditions, probably, and maybe there should be some restrictions. freedom there of the media, censorship, and so on and so forth, because there are people which are spreading in some kind of cancer. and there are people who are already turning to threats themselves. right now, in the announcement, we were talking about different lists in general, compiling a list of illustrative lists or execution lists, as they say, this is a favorite pastime.