and now you will happily demand this in order to call galina mikhailovna to account. galina mikhailovna is not alone, but in our country does this mean that uh? such as e galina mikhailovna do not have the right. e on their here these here statements laws. they have no right to violate. it's an obvious story, but it's just that here, uh, there's a risk that we're going to expand this and expand all of this. here is this circle although it seems to me that there is another way out. no. this is probably because under these conditions, probably, and maybe there should be some restrictions. there is freedom of the media , censorship, and so on and so forth, because there are people who spread some kind of cancer there. and there are people who are already turning to threats themselves. right now, here in the announcement, we were talking about different lists in general, compiling a list of illustrative lists or execution lists, as they say, this is their favorite pastime. there are representatives of our opposition, who

especially left here. well, facts remain facts, so what to do with them? these are difficult problems. to me it seems, and let's try to start discussing it today. so let's then ivan sergeevich is the last one on the list. andrey vladimirovich i don't know, you haven't watched it, i don't see you yet watch it six. i give you positions this week the background of the fight against corruption alexei navalny , he is recognized in russia as an extremist organization , published the so-called list of corrupt officials and warmongers. in him. already 6,000 people to the kremlin propagandists. for some reason, they carried oleg kashin and ksenia sobchak, who performed against the special operation in ukraine for a long time, kashin, who lives in london, considered. this is a personal revenge of the fbk employees, and sobchak no scribbled a whole protest manifesto, saying that they are not adding those to the list. the craving of a soviet person for petty informing and settling small scores is probably not indestructible in the beautiful russia of the future in the pre-election

debates that were shown on all federal channels. i said that russia itself needs to join nato every week to my entire audience of millions, i talked about corrupt officials, tyranny and crimes officials about torture and torture in colonies and prisons. in the very first hours. after the start of the special operation. i quite clearly expressed my position. people from the list are divided into categories. propagandists, corrupt officials, public supporters of putin are corrupt celebrities and key officials. the russian president was included in the war organizers section along with him. there are also 30 members of the russian security council and hundreds of military personnel from the ministry of defense . it is curious that a couple of weeks ago, the experiment emotionally talked about just such a list. belgium is now euro-deputies start bikovich, what's yours fifth package of coal sanctions? ridiculous this is only 3% of russia's imports what's next swift funny more than 50% of the financial institutions of the russian federation

have avoided this type of sanctions oligarchs. they have lost almost nothing from your sanctions. you need to take care of the six thousand people around putin, these are real people who work with putin, and we already have a list, obviously, that the list itself was compiled for a very long time. although they also made mistakes , the employees of the federal media fell into the category of the hierarchy of the russian orthodox church. more there turned out to be galina volchek, who died back in 2019 after criticizing her from there, remove one more confirmation that the list was invented a long time ago, this is what appears on it, the hosts of the programs are polite people who appeared on ntv a few years ago, apparently, bulk acted on the principle nobody is forgotten, nothing is forgotten. extreme times call for extreme solutions. we will ensure that all those responsible for this war are punished. there is also. yes? and nikonova

what is there nikonov who is an anti-traveler in general and there written, leading polite people and meeting place. good? why? that's it, since you started why 6,000 is that there are 6,000 people around putin. you are wrong, why did i explain in such a shirt that it was your polite looking for things now that i found stage qualities on you still fastened. here is my jacket. here, explain to me that's six thousand, yes, well, this is a coincidence and no, in europe they say 6,000. here in bc it is 6.000. uh, it's very simple they moved on to the next phase. so the comrades listed everyone who is clean potentially, uh, is, according to their understanding, servants

to the regime, starting with the military with politicians. so, yes, they have it enable, which means those who made this war possible and, therefore, propagandists and all poets under the brush. apparently. they took, therefore, lists from different years. they didn’t clean out anything, did n’t check it, and that’s it. it is you who understood it. antonovich explain to me. why is this needed? because those who ended up on this list. it seems to me that only who knows who wrote to each other congratulated, calmed down on this. calculated calculated to scare someone. i doubt. designed by some to compile a large list. so who else is under personal sanctions. that is, from that side did not hit. look here for names not yet covered. i just don’t understand why i’m explaining this here, everything, everything, everything is extremely clear. inside the country, i understand inside the country, i mean between us it's certainly a certain sign of quality. this means that we are doing something right and maybe the program was closed in 1919 in vain. yes, don't dream. do not dream, you had to. you

had to work so that the ratings were good. now, seriously, they're full of tools. attacks, so we need to break this tool, but to indicate that we know about this tool and not pay no attention to it. come on, i'm already you're not the only one here. especially push in the same place is a serious tool. they will actually achieve sanctions against all these people. by the way, our retaliatory actions, mikhail borisovich to be honest, the first thought when i hear your employees reported that i was there in the lists i had. and where is the reward, where is the reward on the other side. that is, if yes, if the enemies mark us, then on the other hand you should remind the hero of an old jewish joke. remember when the jews sold russia wanted to know where i could

get my share. well old about it. we did not sell it to russia. but now you are demanding this reward . i just think that if we are highly rated, moreover, apparently, this list was really created two or three years ago. that's where i am i even see some people even without a patronymic stuffed. that is, they don’t even know what their middle name is. so it’s just a lot to shove there, there and somehow , apparently, well, i don’t know some, maybe sixes or people and we don’t pay attention to this, what is needed pay attention, first of all, uh, it's our citizens who applied for these 6,000 of our citizens. uh, another country with you sanctions lists. that is, it is a collective denunciation. our citizens on our citizens. we must then ask those who compiled this list, should our citizens remain.

you just understand viktorovich, when they make such lists, there, it means, there is a riot of colors, joy that they didn’t add this, they didn’t . add another one, i know everything about him. and if antonchich and i sit down for a drink and make some list of our own, they told us that we are bloody propagandists, which means they are poisoning good people. yes, you, firstly, they, of course, do not try to scare the tar in this way. prashchenko or you or andrey well, as if already on the list, what to be afraid of, they they are trying in this way to influence other people who are still on these lists, who are not yet, and who maybe they are trying to influence, so to speak, to intimidate those people who are not there, so that these people are somehow afraid, and to act in the interests of russia in the format and in others. this is how they try. this, by the way, is one of the reasons for the sanctions list, in general, in this way, it

tries to prevent those who are not yet on these lists from being afraid and not cooperating not, but somehow more inactively. yes such a person who is afraid to actively cooperate, which i will get, yes, who is affected by this. we see it, we know it, that there are people who take this seriously. the second reason is that it is very easy to make such lists. when you are sitting somewhere in exile. and you, in fact, cannot influence what is happening in russia in any way, then make these lists for years, yes, write 600,000 6,000. you know, what the emigrants did during the white period, well, no matter how you treat them, they also counted on the fact that the soviet power will go, and very soon they thought that it would be another year, two more, three more, and everything will go, and then they will come. and here we see essentially the same colleagues. well, i would agree with andrey, in principle, it’s definitely not

necessary to pay attention to these small-minded people. they got money. they worked it out. i can give you an example. about a year ago, khodorkovsky compiled his lists of followers. putin, i also went there. i was accidentally shown someone heard about these lists. something happened there or not, and everyone forgot about them about these lists. the same will forget someone. they took a reference book, for example, there are other things for the administration of the president of the state duma deputies, they wrote everything, they got money, and that's all they pay attention to and tell that someone will. afraid well, i'm up to eight decomposed no actually agree, but i'm talking about something else. now, if god forbid ivan sergeevich anton valeryevich really get drunk and make some kind of list there, and then we don’t trust us. yes where are you m-m small still you can’t drink a passport at all. show me what i mean, there is a great desire on our part to make such lists. i'm not just a progolid mikhailovna began to say something. i know that there many viewers write different

things about her to us in the telegram channel, of course. i say galina mikhailovna , so if we don’t pay attention to this list, let’s, then we’ll talk. that's about the desire that is, there is, to make some kind of list and get rid of it. there, i'm not i know, or at least somehow rein in, or at least those who seem to us, remember all the names at least. let's start now, probably there with maxim well, yes, because yes, now number one number one, because those are council or lists? they actually put a minus somewhere, it is necessary to put a plus, they discuss maxim galkin a lot in connection with his latest video messages through social networks. well, here are the supporters of mr. navalny, they actually almost want him for the presidency somewhere. so, let me give you a few examples it means that in social networks there is a campaign to support maxim galkin so far, he is settling in hospitable israel yes, they have already stood up for defense, a former partner. mikhail khodorkovsky by yusus. leonid of the germans. he recommends the galstun channel to everyone ksenia sobchak also decided to support comedians

, she wrote that she was under attack because of her posts, in social networks she wished maxim patience , what the former showman has a great political future. what galkin well done i have been telling everyone for a long time that we will someday see him on the lists of candidates for the presidential elections in russia with great chances of winning marion you are on the lists no well, i think that you are the first on the list in which i am not, because they want to execute me tolstoy, then from this side they want to see in such cases. you are a very decent person, because they wet it from all sides, so i subordinate primus, and in general, as if in no way an enemy to anyone, but it seems to me that you are dramatizing, as it were, the history of this list and even promoting it, as it were. no, i'm not talking about this list. and about the one that, well, well, you won’t argue with me what it is. uh, how to

call the irritation there is a request, you see, here are the people who left, who are now saying something like margarita, simonyan said, pouring water there. eh, wash our country. well, i want to answer them somehow. actually, i want to. i think that you are philosophical about this, but i wish i would not have known that such a list exists. of this tradition well, galkin, of course, you understand, is clearly suitable for the presidency, because his wife is older and a humorist, that is, in all respects france france and the president of ukraine i mean, as if what it is. here is a great conglomerate city that sins someone. well, look, it seems to me that this list is usually a pr product, which, as they rightly said, will be forgotten in a week. the day before yesterday there were sneakers for which they were allegedly arrested because the sole was yellow. uh, the sneakers themselves were blue, which allegedly even led some documents died down there, but this was a

story there about i don’t know about the fact that the house was bombed, although another person. not about it. you see there an idea with anton valeryevich and a bottle and making lists. she didn't bother me. so anton valeryevich and i sat down and made up our own. there probably won't be a list of you, but maxim aleksandrovich, i think, will be in the top 3. how do you feel about this list, do we have the moral right to compile such a list. i think that yes, even before the appearance of all this, because i express my position. well, i generally seem to sleep the war of lists unworkable. uh, like an argument and a tool, like bombs fly for women and the war is going on in earnest. yes, mikhail borisovich spoke now quite specifically, we need to look at these people who take such a position as citizens of russia, whether they have the right to remain citizens of russia, there is a list of agents, not a matter of decision. yes , a fanton list, what would you like, what would you

write in the title, we need to accept this a little in order to understand. well, so, that is you brand. my creativity is better on paper. it goes better. if yes, they defined people, uh, without without definitions, that is, of course, said those who water, in my opinion. let's write down the country. yes, i like to offer assistants, yes assistants, what composition and collective letters - this is ukraine - this is the enemy. if he's a fee then refuels there, on any side, it's meanness, it's vulgarly vulgar and low, to be honest, on the one hand it's good. wait. yes, wait, wait, censorship is like some kind of filter, yes, which is allows you to stop everything here. here is a muddy stream of these slops. if we do not compile lists, we simply enter, that is, there are certain restrictions on the ability to express completely uncontrolled statements. i don't know how to

do it technically. i'm just suggesting for now, yes, on the internet there, i don't know. well, here on the air there, okay, that's understandable. here you can do it no, they don’t turn a single one , it’s not galkin’s opinion, it’s not the opinion of someone else from those people whom anto would have brought, they would have brought the list. i don't spin anyone. is it possible that the internet is closed, the question arises, of course, it is impossible. well, of course, we clamp down on our program. we are quoting the same maxim galkin, galina mikhailovna, here we had a speech here today, and alexei gennadievich also sometimes, and to say counter-revolutionary things, for example, one wrote, and about yes, they write to us. you said in a telegram what people write in the comments, like it was about you there was such a joke in the war, letters are written to us. it's not just insults, curses and threats. it's true, so to speak, uh someone out there uh dokapy. he came in yellow socks. he is an enemy of the country of the cell in different socks. you on the basis of this will also

be so, and let's think now exaggerate your socks. in general, i somehow don’t really like that side or not. listen, we all need to understand all of us here, uh, viewers participation and so on, that there may be different points of view, you will be pleased. now, if a person appears under your window from the evening in the evening, who will shout nasty things about you, about your spouse and your children. no. of course i'll do anything as well i will contact the police. so well, so, here we are. we are writing a statement; i have no doubt that there are people who, so to speak, will definitely go to knock, denounce, and so on, there is no doubt about it. but what's going on is an incitement to snitching. this is an incitement. what's great on the internet you understand it on the internet. property cannot be banned. here, let's say it all. so the

party line before the betrayal in relation to him, people have the right to this opinion are alexinted. i would suggest you know how that's censored, that's in person against you to limit your performance. there, one and a half minutes, this was generally called the regulation before. so quiet. yes, ivan sergeevich can talk about military censorship. you remembered, since such proposals are heard, well, in recent days quite often, for example, of course, representatives of fair russia spoke for the truth about some kind of public council. it means that which will work, but they watch us on television and somehow evaluate our work, what is right, what is wrong margarita simon openly said that it is necessary to remove from the constitution the article on the prohibition of censorship, because there are statements that threaten the integrity of our state. i think that's what she says, so on the internet on youtube we have now. well, this is absolutely a platform for all kinds of people, not only maxim

alexandrovich galkin, i mean, there are much more radical gentlemen who openly state their position and , well, there is no criminal code on them. well, or not at all he is, because he found those on whom their entire criminal code. 36 criminal cases, i mean an article about fake actions about the actions of the russian armed forces, but people who expressed things that i don’t want to repeat at all and even quote them, not 36, and not even 100 36. let’s, for example, let's see. this week, the moscow city court arrested for 15 days vladimir karamurza jr., an opposition figure already recognized as a foreign agent, was behind bars for disseminating false information about the russian army, investigators drew attention to the performance of karamurza in the arizona house of representatives in march of this year, cluster bombs on residential areas, explosions of maternity hospitals and schools war crimes. that's what it is like in the us arrests only add

points to him and honor him as if he were already dead. there is an old jewish legend that in each generation there are 36 righteous people, on whose righteousness the fate of the world depends vladimir kara-murza certainly. one of these people, however, many believe that the law on fakes works selectively in this way for spreading false information about the russian army , moscow deputy alexei gorinov was detained for 48 hours. but another prominent opposition politician, ilya yashin, was offered to appear for interrogation voluntarily. but the statement of the deputy of the moscow city duma sergey mitrokhin under the laws of fakes does not fall at all for quite a bit of time and all those who support what is happening today. as a result, this so-called military special operation will be bitterly regretted, because it a special operation will claim more human lives in a hundred, and maybe thousands of times, than those victims who in 8 years. they appeared there. there are proposals

to go further and legalize the famous in some way. now, the call of the actor and director sergei bodrov during the war during the war, you can never speak badly about your own, even if they are wrong. uh, how would even there, if your side is not right in time of war, you do not have to speak, and not bad. i think it's very simple, the principle, it's very old, very primitive, but it's true. uh, when there's nothing threatens, when the war is over, then, yes, then you can say valery vasilyevich what do you think, is it possible somehow by law? this creative proposal was made 30 years ago by sergey bodrov to formalize it. now i don't know whether to call it censorship, whether to call it rules? whether to call it some other word, but nevertheless. well, ah, you know, history shows that everything is possible, so yes, it is probably possible to express it from the legislation. you

, as a citizen of the russian federation, valery valerievich to us. tell me one thing, if you want to be always supported, then, well, according to the laws of today's world, you must always be a victim, if you are not a person, but states and you want to always be supported and not criticized, then you always need to be, not i can support my state, which i want to see strong, powerful and just, and not some kind of victim, of course. well, as you can see, the state today comes to a simple idea, if you want to stop criticism, you need hmm special military operation, or what you already call? chicken no, well, i see what dividends all those people who want to stop criticism extract. they say it turns out we are already at war. they are a special operation. they say stop criticizing because we are in

a difficult situation. that's what they are entitled to. i understand people want people want to ask a question. how will it continue, because yes, military censorship is needed if we have a war and this was answered for a long time? uh-huh no, i'm just saying, vitalya andreevich what about people want order because they want order is not the full right. you know, i'm sitting and listening. now about the war and some kind of censorship, we would change some kind of ordinary censorship, because sometimes i go into ours. rather, in the western social network, which continue to work on the territory of russia, and one of the people involved in this compilation of the list stands on end, by the way, in which i also read yesterday that i’m not lying in our bookstores, you can’t read it. yes, you see, and again, who here allowed this. just know, fuck the collective responsibility, there is collective irresponsibility. are you absolutely right that it is time to introduce some legal norms here in this situation? well, because we are now here a woman who is afraid of rape with the keys to the apartment

argues ah. yes, and now latvia is adopting a law that i can say, well, lovers of freedom we will be freedom, you can say that you have always infringed on the right of russians, you said, like what kind of sarcasm alexey gennadievich please calm down, yes, some kind of incontinence of something. give me please to tell. you want all the time that you've been told and so forth, but you don't know how to behave. you don't even know how to listen to your opponent. at the same time, you always complain about some kind of north korea. pay attention to yourself. north korea, then you youtube - this is north korea i often ask vitaliy and where look at your author's interviews over the past few years, nowhere. and you know why, because youtube took it because it censored and deleted it all, now there is nowhere to go and that's it. look. yeah, it just doesn't work anywhere. northern it turns out that we feel i have a certain weakness of vulnerability, well, in the case of

a perfect description, then we should show it. force, yes, introducing some rules of restriction, censorship of this word, are they afraid or not? when we feel weak in one place, we make up for it with strength elsewhere. can this be compensated? i have a difficult question here. you just need to lie and act now, because in the first place there is time to build up. sorry, we are now going to celebrate demagoguery. we are just again, they don't give me an alcoholic. what is today i say, okay, you're a good alcoholic, at least you're not hiding behind some great. again, we must act now in latvia acting us acting why should we turn the cheek in this situation? immediately, vladimir milov, about whom i said that he is now declaring from somewhere in warsaw that he will return to russia and make you and i use a white and blue red rag to wash the public toilet with him. the main thing you touch you said citizens of the russian federation like this

how those these and so on antonch work. is it necessary to play the role of a bloodthirsty alcoholic who is a bloodsucker ? yes, he came with a phrase that he would believe in it. well, because not so many times they said that today we will have a drink with you and make some lists . in general, in fact, i’m not going to insert a list, because it will very much resemble the peacemaker. and i don’t want to be like this comrade, which means i’ll be alone, but no, we’ll be together, but i won’t force me on the list , but what lists are needed. here, what vitalik correctly said, we have a bunch of laws that are not being enforced. everything. for example, there is now responsibility for the calls for anti-russian sanctions in this constitutional joke. this is really serious on the basis of these sanctions, then i realized the basis of these calls, then the sanctions are introduced so let's give a list of these people who have been bastards for years - this is not the first list of six thousand. they have been there for years, mr. navalny, in my opinion, wrote a letter to the accident some other way. damn, when you see sanctions, means against. eh, those are all exceptions. it

harms both personally and the economy. if it 's some businessman that stands behind people who work as a businessman. first, you took a little away, again, i'm not sure, we just asked you a question. yes, can we act without excluding the current norms, introduce some new norms of the rule, and i will answer, i answer to edit. and i answer. i really want our favorite show to continue to go on the air, because by leading some additional things that we don’t understand. i can't speak for or against. perhaps there will be something there. a reasonable proposal for myself, perhaps it may be unreasonable, but i mean that i will say the last phrase. we have great legislation. you need to learn how to perform it and when these examples are about books about a statement about everything else. well, listen, but it was necessary, but khinshtein. pay attention to and to this exhibition in order for the machine to spin, but so far khinshtein has not paid attention to this. it was all good. and this is not only mikhailovich for you,

in my opinion, no, there is no complexity and censorship. because the state in our e-country, and the government, more precisely, is the only body competent for some kind of repression. yes, within the framework of the laws that are prescribed, so here, if the state does not keep up with the opinions of society, it will not respond to this, i would not call it a request. i would call it bewilderment, yes. regarding certain insults in relation to our society as a whole, which today, uh, participate, in principle, uh in a special operation, but with their feelings with their experiences. e with his support of the army. if there are people who curse all this, and the state will not have time to fulfill its functions. then we can face such civic

actions that will be perceived. well, as some kind of lynching, yes. and this lynching, maybe in a moral sense, that is, some kind of contempt for these people, or maybe quite already with some kind of physical measures, quieter, quieter. let's take a short break, it's short. just one card for everything. april 30 only on ntv golden anniversary 55 bright years, the most popular artist of russia phrases of the judge according to kirkorov congratulate the favorite heroes of past seasons