under the editorship of muslik and kapets, if you believe him, then the ancestors of the french, spaniards, portuguese, turks, and even jews came from ukraine. i want to turn to my french colleague. nicolas, you knew that you were actually ukrainian. don't believe. read the textbook. i took it from there in it iron logic, since the ancestors of the french are gals, they came from a quantity that in ukraine is no longer gasoline. he recalled that back in 2015, the then president petro poroshenko announced valeriy bibik as the chief historian of ukraine and even suggested that he head a special ministry for inform policy, for example, in ukraine there is such a historian valery and he is not the only one , so he claims that constantinople was a colony of chersonesus on the territory of modern sevastopol and the progenitor of the scythians. this is a crop from the crimea of ​​hercules, whose roots come from the island of the

famous mongol commander who lived in the 12-13 centuries, as the bebek of genghis khan is convinced , it turns out that his name was actually baghdada. well, from this it is clear that i can’t do anything either mongol a there is a ukrainian or a ukrainian, moreover, he fought , as he is sure, with the ukrainian trident and arson with some black signs. well, and finally, its main ukraine is generally the cradle of world civilization, and even jesus christ does not rule out furniture in one of his interviews could be exalted. i'm not kidding. i am quoting his interview in response to a very bright speech, nebenzi, volunteered ukrainian post predoklitsy. i will not apologize for not listening carefully to the nonsense of the russian ambassador, but i want to announce the news

russian delegation. scientific evidence continues to suggest that all modern humans are descendants of the african population of homo sapiens that dispersed from africa 60,000 years ago. i am proud to be one of these people. mom, now i wouldn’t comment on the operator’s voice, but i can’t help expressing it. here is our common satisfaction. due to the fact that these are our calls to somehow reconfigure our diplomatic and this public activity. they obviously find it interesting here is the security council for education in ukraine, please, not just some kind of statement of fact, but details details are good beautiful from the first source, these homosapins from africa can be anything according to the nonsense of the russian ambassador, but this is not the nonsense of the russian ambassador this is the nonsense of official ukrainian representatives , including ukrainian so-called scientists, whom vasily nebenzya

quotes is another matter, which, of course, is not for everyone . this is also given to understand by aleksey gennadievich, since the conclusion was the most noisy, that we misunderstood somehow. you are choosing the right direction. in my opinion. until absolutely brilliant, of course. those object in the hands of an artifact are even more emotions, so to speak, and more. or maybe like this, and more sarcastic and more, well, that is, it’s clear that it’s not for me to give advice to our diplomats, but, in principle, yes, the path is absolutely right, more sarcasm of causticity, and not feel free to put on a show, don’t be shy to hype. how will this help? eh? wait e. at least before i give you a word, right? and, because we have here, although the show, but nothing to think about, my position, which i have said repeatedly, is the following, if we fail to reach out to the officials, then we

need to work with the audience. and such a message , such a manner works precisely and is the impact and building communications with the audience with ordinary people who will see it and, of course, they will laugh. i don’t know, i don’t know, there is jean-paul, when he hears that his ancestors, so to speak, because of galina there or or from near lvov of course, he will twist his finger, and whisk's finger is absolutely effective work, effective influence on the formation. yes, to confirm, you don’t think that this is correct, and the technique is extremely, it seems against the background of the so-called special operations, yes , to conduct such entertainments like this for simple french. well, what the official kiev authorities of vladimir zelensky are doing is not a show. you won't tell me that this is a show of different perceptions. why alexander and for one

simple reason now and for ukraine and ukrainians. uh, they're trying to portray a shakespearean drama to us. but at the core, i would say, still ancient greek. with all sorts of nuances to argue, at the heart of this drama lies. it’s not even a comedy, but on the threshold, and in order to counteract this exaltation of neo-nazis and the call, as ancient heroes, it is necessary to show that they descended from heaven is also such a phrase that ukrainians in europe perceive as gods descended from heaven, i don’t know. how, by the way, speaking of yesterday, maybe you saw the footage that was filmed in warsaw where drunk ukrainian refugees beat to death the inhabitants of the epollian capital, who interceded, er, interceded for the girl. these drunken gods began to

molest some girls there, too, and the guy stood up, and they beat him, using edged weapons. all this was filmed not only by men. there were ukrainian women, so -called refugees, who stood in the background. here is a dying man neighing and they said, what are we going to talk about ? there you will also give this here, these are the gods who descended from the sky to the european reaction of the polish ministry of internal affairs on this divine behavior seen no there is such restraint, i do not understand, of course, of course, left dear mr. just does not see anything that is judgmental is the restraint of the reaction. the search for the vvd was dictated by just creating and we are the myth of these newly-minted ones, which, therefore, stebalova over them removes this paphos, this is very important right now. let's hmm i've never been a supporter. uh, pr well, i confess, pr is a

useful thing, but it's always auxiliary, but everything is decided by tanks, that is, no. i like it beautifully done can only be applauded. i'm just not suggesting not to exaggerate. no, i ’ll let you disagree here that the polish police reacted this way because they perceive these refugees somehow special or something else, it’s their business that they were inspired that these are the gods descended because it’s just profitable and need to. excuse me for not noticing that a crowd has now appeared all over europe. these refugees are refugees millions of refugees who fled, and there are special young refugees. not in excellent condition among them there are a lot of young men who allegedly are not allowed to leave the territory. these are professional refugees. again, i refer to the

video. uh, i don't remember now in some european club. so, when they go there all covered in blood, there they are all smeared with blood, and, uh, it means that everything is filmed and one lady. well, this is preparation for this, how to say performances. yes , she says on camera it is necessary to cry, that is. yes, it's ok, that's right. these are professional refugees. they were brought there precisely in order to terrorize all those who, uh, supports in one way or another russia’s word said to deal with you, and the police stand and say, it’s not us, it’s not us, it’s refugees, it ’s, uh, they were offended by the russians there, uh, they blew up the house, so they can afford it. this is an instrument for carrying out the policy of the european union on the territory of the european union in the fight against dissent. there they began to talk about not exaggerating the effectiveness. this is me coming back. you started to nebenze yes igor the fact is that it is perfectly clear that not other representatives are representatives other countries at the security council, neither other diplomats nor

leaders of other states, of course, uh, their opinion will not change due to the fact that, because of the speech of e, not benzia or polyansky, other representatives of russia at the un but he is and the security council is a platform that is currently open for russia to speak in order to voice its position, and this is very important, as has already been said here. this position concerns not only, uh, to show the farce yes, ukrainian society and the education system, the way they present is that the history of europe is yes for the same french. this can be heard by ordinary people in the west, even if you hear not a million or 100,000. and whoever hears this will reach out to someone . this is already some kind of effect it does not need to be exaggerated really. but what is the effect of what concerns nazi manifestations in ukraine , not on such radical manifestations of which western prizes practically do not speak, again, it is one of those platforms that are currently open to russia and as many russia will remain a member of the united nations, but it will

remain a member of the un, this platform must continue to be used in this sense and to speak directly, not only to speak to other members, but to talk to the security council, try to use it in order to talk to those who can do it at this time, at which the statement of non-benzia appeared, another interview with his castle was also circulated, like polyansky it can not be so spectacular, which they interrupt a few days ago, behaved approximately the same way when e was given an interview with sky and yes, i explained to our respected british colleague that the photo with a dead head, which was posted by the ukrainian presidents. it is necessary to perceive a few, otherwise it is then. as you remember it came and respected. uh, the sky news anchor quickly wrapped up the interview. oh, and our time has changed brit. there were no elements of some kind of show or something like that. but it was said absolutely clearly and clearly. russia has changed its attitude towards ukraine's accession to the european union,

and from now on they treat it in the same way as accession to nato, that is, negatively, because the european union has been supplying ukraine with weapons for the last month. well, there was a long time ago, so to speak, such a warning regarding the initiative of sweden and finland to join the north atlantic agent polyansky urged to remember that the appearance of the nato armed forces on the territory of finland and sweden would mean in the event of a conflict. they will become a target for the russian military. in addition, when threatening russia , one should remember that we are talking about a state with nuclear weapons instead of finland uh and sweden at one point from neutral countries are moving into an old enemy. they carry the same risks as all other military economic ones, but it is up to them and their populations to decide. such a step would be the worst decision for them. but not for russia, finnish president saule furiously and the prime minister of the san-marine country had earlier announced that they wanted to enter the north atlantic alliance as soon as possible and this would benefit the other and the entire bloc. finland should

immediately apply for nato membership we hope that steps at the national level, the decisions necessary to implement this decision will be quickly taken in the coming days, the finnish parliament will discuss the issue of accession and apparently vote on may 16. on the same day, discussion is scheduled in sweden in nato. of course, everything. this only welcomes general secretary jens stoltenberg, promised that the recruits would be warmly received, and the process of their entry would be smooth. and they expect to settle all the formalities quickly by the july nato summit in madrid in such a procedure. will these procedures be settled in the near future? i think, that this goal is in time for nato itself, which will take place soon returned and london prime minister boris johnson has already signed a declaration on security guarantees with finland and sweden in case of any aggravation, it looks belligerent and one can say selflessly at the same time in the best british traditions in the document. there is correspondence

that this is only a declaration of intent and it has no binding legal force. i think this solemn declaration is clear in itself, it says that in the event of a catastrophe or an attack on any of us. we will provide each other with assistance, including military, but the nature of this assistance, of course, will depend on the request, the other side of the main beneficiaries of the new expansion. nato appointed themselves the baltic states. so the president of estonia advised this holm and helsinki not to be afraid of russia's reaction, since moscow does not have sufficient resources for a military response, and the lithuanian ministry of defense rushed to calculate how much all this would weaken moscow and what can be drunk from this if the russian military strategies will indeed work not only on political orders, as in the case of ukraine, but they will realistically assess the situation. they will understand that the kaliningrad region in this

case will be. and completely blocked. how much this will increase the security of sweden, finland, because, frankly, i don’t understand this logic, there is a nato bloc that indirectly understands all of mine, is trying to fight russia in ukraine, and at the moment when all this flares up more and more, two countries and up to this neutral. well, it is clear that there is somehow necessary to help them decide. and let's just throw ourselves into the hole, but this does not increase security, it kind of speaks of some kind of ideological orientation, it speaks of where the political leaders are looking, but this does not speak of security. well, it's not about security at all. this is a conversation that some firms will be enriched by the military-industrial complex of the us military-industrial complex germany, those who supply in advance receive contracts. this is not talk about security. it's a conversation of acquisition. they get richer these farms. there ran a 30% rise in the metal, shares will now be observed, that is, these are already forecasts, because it does not receive

orders for a year, that something is being produced in finland or sweden . that's what their security may not increase , they will be required to pay 2% of gdp prescribed by nato, and hmm, you know how much i miss when they say politicians, foreign ministry officials. they speak in very specific text. this is linguistics, bureaucratic from the other side. here i am i think it's a completely naive statement. it is necessary to use the un platform. yes, it has been used for so many years that it’s useless to read this bureaucratic language from a piece of paper there all the time, no one understood it in the media, only in russia they heard it. if not benzia said something in the west, a complete occupation is taking place and going on. there's no show to help. a completely different linguistics will help when the same swedes. the same hair dryer is here to explain, guys, you don’t think that because you placed 200 tanks there. you threw some prz there own stories, actually. so you think that there will be one single missile, you don’t need more power than one small nuclear bomb, which will 15 years of radiation on your land, your

farmers will suffer. this is the kind of linguistics that needs to be explained to these people in a primitive language, what awaits them just right. and why do we need to be quiet, lord. why do we need to intimidate them, because , uh, these are the same activities the same now, but in the ministry of defense, as far as i am correct. and if i remember correctly, and it was stated that we do not see any signs of a military threat from russia. therefore, a completely logical question arises from the outside. why then and why a wife? because if we say now, well, here's how, for example, evgeny alekseevich uh, fedorov, yes. e is from russia because he's now we're fucking whatever he wanted texas now we're dropping a nuke on the couch. well, here it is somehow. it seems to me that there is absolutely no logic here. today, all the finns do not

feel any danger. statement tomorrow they they provide their territory for those who pose a danger to russia, and russia will have to respond military-technically. let's break it down, because we'll say, this is not bullying. this is, firstly, an opinion about the bureaucratic bureaucratic lexicon. it seems to me mm. we may soon forget, because there is a fix for the bugs, but the rhetoric that you offer. well, i strongly disagree with this. let's look, and again the story from finland, you're right. say it's not about security, of course, it's about politics opportunistic moment, because now we need to climb into nato because there is supposedly a certain threat, some kind of challenge, and the finns believed in it, they believe in anti-russian propaganda, they believe, but at the same time they do not see it. they don't see. yes, there have always been

moods cooled. not in nato there was a priority were the political forces that were driven to finland in nato there was pressure from officials. nato was pressured by the estonians. they were promoters in the way of finland estonia estonia year after year no one crushed in finland yes. year after year estonian diplomats meet, follow us. go to the alliance, we said, the finnish model of neutrality is not bad. we need finnishization. the baltic states, on the contrary, came out with the re-butization of finland, and therefore now , against the background of the military special operation of russia, those groups inside the political finland that e advocated this path, they began to dominate ideologically. now they tell me, do you agree with vladimir vladimirovich's proposal to talk to them in such a way that they will

take a step when you talk about bombs for 15 years tell me, he says, they will sit down and say. here you are sometimes. american bases, then you become an automatic target for super super weapons, and you already know it, sweden and finland have already accepted, in fact. the solution is not to build illusions here. they are essentially directions to join nato, it has already been determined, and in this situation, russia has nothing to lose for moscow's security. victor, as this will increase their security, that i will answer the question. how is it about their safety until the ninety-first year was the same state, then ukraine and estonia and latvia or two were part of a single state, and we were all members, which means a member of the warsaw pact, and then and and by the way, and when the

country was vot ira, whose members until the ninth year and in those at that time 40 years 40 years after the second world war, finland did not feel enough threat to act then in us oh now, when all these countries are members of nato in finland declares a threat from russia , it does not feel a threat . so one more time if uh, then they apply to join nato while not feeling any further military threats from russia. what should our territory be like once again i will quote the gentleman on polyansky who we have now opened this story to finland sweden at one moment from neutral countries go to the camp of the enemy. they bear the same risks as everyone else, the rest of the economic military risks are up to them and their population. such a step would be the worst decision for them, but not for russia, it's right enough. everything is clear. no need.

there is no need to say anything else like that, because the finns are now really after they accepted it. this is the solution, they immediately began to think. what can be? uh, russia's next steps there are not only gas stories. there they have many different assumptions. we will now have time to consider some of them. the iltalehti publication is frightening, as if russia will stop gas supplies in the coming days, finland is called the last date on may 23, when the time will come to pay for our gas in rubles. what are the finns to do? they flatly refuse, and the authorities until they shrug their hands. i cannot verify this data in this format. it is known that, in general, europe is discussing the future of gas supplies from russia to the west, according to the finnish national defense university. russia is preparing hybrid attacks, will secretly drop its military under the guise of rescuers, and, as if by accident, hit one of the regions of finland with a live missile in order to intimidate

finland would be forced to act, but how an unclear situation can lead to a split in unity the finns will return the understanding that everything needs to be negotiated about not provoking the finnish authorities. now they are preparing the population for a possible escalation immediately after the decision to apply to nato in helsinki journalists. they called me for a tour. in bomb shelters. they are designed for 4 1/2 million people. inside there are playgrounds cafe car parks. and even the stadiums are curious that the presentation was launched on the american cnbc channel. we are ready to repel any attack repel any kind of weapon, gas bomb shelter, impenetrable protects against radiation and poisonous chemists but bbc journalists believe that russia's military-technical response will manifest itself in overloading the border from finland with troops and missiles, which, out of respect for the neutral status of helsinki, moscow at one time, took as much as 1,500 km from the border, and then in particular says

vladimir putin in 2016. what do you think, we will continue to act on one and a half thousand troops withdrew our troops so they will remain there, or something, but we are in any case. we will respect any choice of the finnish people on how to defend their the independence of their security to ensure it is the choice of the finns, of course, we value, uh, the neutral status of finland with respect, this question was respected, paraphrasing the statement of one of my finnish friends. i could say that the nato organization would probably be happy to fight with russia to the last finnish soldier. you need it so we value finnish neutrality very much , finnish neutrality is disappearing, so we will take some steps mathias. you as a representative of germany now should act as the main expert in the field. here is the russian gas trade there for rubles for euros. not

well, with the germans somehow everything somehow develops. here. oh, by the way, the kremlin called a duck newspaper. right away finn turned off the gas. although maybe at the end of the month we will turn it off if they want to pay. yes, what do you think, what kind of further development of the situation is there. maybe i think the strong picture doesn't change either because it was, sorry we've been getting for how many years. e narrow voice. if not more and in this respect, i think we going to just see that driving is very strong on words. and in status, of course we will see that some bottlenecks often approach the border of finland - this is the only situation. i also react the same way, if i were a russian general, but nothing changes, because both sides understand that the image is now in the background. i am containment. now it is already impossible to solve some from the floor,

because they will bring it right away. i probably have a war and this war and not the finns you are playing and schmidding. you won't win, so it basically doesn't change. even if it was, if they were not part of nato, they are still standing in the war, so they are now scared, yes, well, you know, when you bring one version of the version you can make money on it yes do not play them. you don't have to be scared to start. they are now i second second. i think it's completely wrong and generally unacceptable all this talk about where we want to go with a nuclear charge. it's enough that the president said that we have nuclear weapons. and when necessary we apply it. but when we are everywhere and everywhere on every broadcast, we say that we are zhahne back and forth, it's not good, it suits us. this is the first second hmm i also think it’s completely strange to talk about the

security of finland the security of sweden and nothing became neutral, but from the fact that the world fell in love or from the fact that they felt safe in finland was an independent state from the eighteenth to the thirty-ninth year before this independent there was no such state. all these years - it was the enemy of our country, then they became white and fluffy friendly. why? yes, because received. so they didn’t want to discourage them for a long time. yes, absolutely true with the swedes. we have been at war for centuries. uh-huh when in the end they got it under alexander i. so after that, they said everything. we are neutral we are no longer involved, then. by the way, they lost finland. the very one it belonged to sweden. but now you need to understand that in the west they really think that this fight will end with our defeat. they are sure that they will manage to

break us, and they feel about the guys. it's time to reset all these clothes of neutrality are now to come. uh, dividing up the booty, how would we not be left on the sidelines. that's what's in their brains. and this also needs to be taken into account and must be taken into account. the acquisitions that got out there, and i remind you that in the thirty-ninth year it was britain who provoked finland so that the soviet-finnish war erupted in finland, there were a lot of supporters to agree. e with moscow but it was british influence that did not allow it to be done and now mr. johnson is jumping out of the snuffbox like the devil signs the relevant documents, you guys are completely safe, in general, yes, they didn’t help him then britain. it seems to me that you contradict yourself a little at the beginning. and you, he said you about tanks, because zhaknut, of course i want to say it is necessary. just scale hot started

talking, you know? no need to threaten him with a rush there, a rush here. on the whole, i agree with you to sometimes overwhelm emotions, but we’ll threaten you. no need on the other side. you immediately cited two historical examples that by neutrally friendly these countries we mean sweden with finland there can be only one case, if they understand that now the russian dash, the soviet troops will reach their capital, well, it’s not, of course, it’s not hot, but in general it’s about the same thing, but uh, throwing words about nuclear strikes - these are completely different things with you. yes, oksana yuryevich should gasp, not talk. yes, but they threaten those who are thirsty even in ukraine, you also hear this, so you need to look in the history from finland. eh, move back a little from today . we are sometimes too immersed in the current there is no trip today, but in order to evaluate these events, we need to step back a little, which means that

the kremlin should properly evaluate this story, which is most likely. yes, it has already taken place, so, uh, and of course. uh, there will be a military-technical answer, but let's remember what will come after a specially military operation is victoriously completed. after that, negotiations will begin on the same, that is we return to december last year there will be a new architecture for 5 euros per one of the key issues will be discussed within the framework of these negotiations. the return to the military infrastructure of nato to the state of the ninety- seventh year, that is, neither in finland nor in sweden will there appear either american or german shells , nothing of the kind will appear. they will be politically

in some kind of union and pay well. why is it excluded? well, it's easy to say or generally easy to return. in december last year, yes, against the background, again, of this so-called special operation. and when it is against you, the new western world. yes, you see, they are convinced that they will break us. no, desktop world that's how many times here to talk to the west. yes, i'll bring about right now in the czech republic. yes, you know about the president. eh, i generally like it recently . no , that's right, he never was.