introduce such a term into circulation and not only a term, this whole concept, behind this there is a very colossal work. i call it information vaccinations. and it's not a pandemic that pushed me. it was i who actively engaged in this information vaccination. when i was still involved in elections, for example, we take a specific information block. well, the same fake, for example, since we touched them. let's not leave them. and on the example of this fake, we show how it is built, what is its depravity, that is, we need to do training. yes, and you can call it education, in principle, of course, of course, but this must be done in such a way that our young people are interested in it. so that they do not say, but this is complete nonsense. let's figure it out ourselves. i

very often have discussions with my eldest grandson, my fellow students, second-year students and some institutes in the city of moscow. and here i am, as it were, trying to hone the technology of information vaccinations on this micromodel. in some ways it turns out in some ways not always andrei's objectivity. i agree. i want to add about technology information injections, how they work, and information vaccination is such a counter-throw, which allows you to instill e in a person who is just in the center of the audience, which is affected by immunity to those throws that will be carried out by the organizers of the information operation or attack. the fact is that a-a is the scheme underlying e, practically without exception, information operations. it is very simple by sequential. gently lead a person imperceptibly for his creation to certain conclusion and create the illusion that he

came to this conclusion himself. here are his portioned technologies . yes, at the same time, and this takes time, that is, these should be portions, small, which are dumped at certain intervals and the person must be under the influence all the time, and one injection is superimposed on another. uh, then another throw-in is applied to him, an immune effect is obtained, and he comes to the conclusion that we actually put in here, if at some point in the middle this chain to break it with the help of information vaccination said that we know how it will end what. eh? what kind of conclusion will be drawn, then the chain will break and the informational action. it's an interesting defense. and about technology. we'll talk more, but after the commercials , the ads on ntv you've been bad for too long. the first time i heard larisa was in the year 1900. oh, my god, and many years ago, we young impudent people came to look at

a girl who sings jazz very well, it's nothing, but my age is here, well, 35 maximum birthday of larisa dolina ah, on saturday at 0:45 i managed to have a flat at margulis's on ntv who called a friend from a past life? i'm tired of these calls of yours from a past life coming back, that he escaped from prison, some, so he is my ex co-serving. why the murderer of alexander ursulyak? what time is 48 hours? i want this bastard to pay for everything, in full, otherwise your wife

will not live. the vet i once knew would never raise a hand against a woman, vladimir epifantsev once again you smell this thing near my face, i love you i'll kill you, understand? black dog new season next friday at 20:00 on ntv year of science and technology on the air program science and we are a program about how science will change in our lives, the next 10 years in 10 years science will make information wars impossible. well, i would like our expert professor kapustin to talk about the information war against russia. information wars can be compared to the zombie apocalypse; there are no dead, but each victim joins the enemy and the enemy becomes stronger. the weakest point in the information war. this is our mind main task information wars destroy the national

values ​​of the state through the media through the cinema, but especially through the internet. same-sex marriages and mitoelbt hatred for their country and its history are being imposed on us. this is how the color revolutions begin . don't wait. precisely andrey viktorovich is in the information war of technology under attack. what are used, what are this spoon, what are social networks, where, how is it all , these aggregates are used as a channel for bringing the control action. and in order to show what technologies affect. let me draw better. yes, please. for cockroaches, i'll remember you. so well, let's start, well, with cockroaches, the helmet was perfect, by the way, protection. here i put it all on, and you're

like in a tank. it didn't get through to you to get through so there is. let's go technology. ah, because any information operation. this is the first line of operational combinations that are carried out by special services, or even e scheme there today, any information operation consists of a sequence of information question. separated by periods of silence absolutely, and here's how, a day before the election, to cite as an example one person with blue shorts, he is just something, and then silence, there is nothing and that's it, this is combined into a recursive sequence of withdrawal, that is, stuffing pause stuffing , a pause always just follows consecutively never they are thrown randomly. and that's why the attribute, by the way, determines information operations.

if, uh, if stuffing hits the object, the impact is chaotic from all sides. it's rather total. this is most likely not an information operation. it's just that it's just an information company, which means hundreds of times dozens, or hundreds of times less dangerous if you throw one. that it is usually called informational if the stuffing is in 2 3, 4 then, as a rule, this is an operational game, all intelligence and operational games are played. the game, if the stuffing is more than six, then this is usually a strategic information operation. now the technology of influence, which means that the first trick is catching a lie. this is when it affects, on politics

he throws in some, for example, compromising evidence, he begins to react, and, moreover, he reacts to emotions there, it is he who begins to deny that they catch him, and thereby builds a scheme according to his discretization. he can frustrate several times, justifying himself catches him several times, it becomes pleasing to him. on anything. so what, yes, a person has a clitoris in the closet. and if he lives dishonestly, then, of course, he can be removed. but, don't get caught. so, the second trick is live bait fishing, for example, which was arrested. yes, something flies her help out, the next trick. this is the so-called driven hunt. this is when the object of the information operation, that is, the one the politician is going to break, yes, or win over to his side, puts up flags, as when hunting for wolves

, and they drive him along this corridor, that is, with the help of the same stuffing, he draws in some some skirmish. he starts making excuses. and each time denying something, he narrows the corridor for himself. and in the end. this corridor narrows to such an extent that it has no operational space and it obediently follows. she those numbers where the hunter is already standing, and the hunters with weapons are finishing him off . something else is blackmail and ultimatums its movement is ultimatums. and with the nomination, well, here is a typical example - this is the case of the violinists, when theresa may, uh, at a certain moment, said that you are to blame for this russia and uh, the russian federation is given a day to admit to this game . and if this does not happen, and in a day the uk will consider this incident as some kind of military aggression, but there was, uh, more colorful episode. i'm asking, uh, slide number one to show

the headlines. this is a case about a dick. in november 2018. uh, so there should have been a change in the head of interpol and, uh, our general should have become the head of interpol. prokopchuk. yeah, with an impeccable, by the way, reputation, but by this time everyone was with a bandarage demon of skripals and against, uh, a prokopchik, but they organized a persecution. the united states formed a coalition. which, by the way, india also entered, with which we have never fought and we consider it our friend. they announced that if the russian candidate becomes the head of interpol. all these countries will leave the interpols will cease to exist. as a result, today the head of interpol is a south korean candidate. here are four lines. thank you about protection, let's talk that it will not always help, but with this, mikhailovich, how can you defend yourself there? from this horror

in general from the information war. at least some technologies can be there, from what has already been said today, it is clear what the protection of sovereignty consists in. if the achievian union had enough sovereignty, they would not care what about they think, the roman senate, if india had enough sovereignty, india would not get into the information war against russia. what is sovereignty? let's see what a calendar is - people have a need to measure time. and people are starting to celebrate this time somehow. the more people use this calendar. the more legitimate it is, the more people use it. that is, this is for a ring for a ring on nothing, not hanging. the same power people have a need to be in power structures to obey to command and over this need arises for ringing, legitimization of power, legitimization, clergy and etimization of orders

dissimilization of money all our knowledge is for ringing what we call knowledge and distinguish from faith this is for ringing hanging in the void over the basic needs of a biological species to do their habitat more predictable. and where do we need to loop the committee, these rings, they are already starting to childize each other, so that this structure of loops, which legitimize each other so that it is strong, so that it is in people's heads, so that people perceive it as something durable, this is sovereignty. still, it's the first and second. well , just because of the peculiarities of the national character, we need an idea, we need the luck of the future, and we have it. that is, now russia is being accused of having nothing to offer in the international arena. but in fact, russia already offers this here

, you mentioned morality. uh-huh what is morality morality is an evolutionary mechanism. at morals. there is one principle, do not do it to another person. if you don't want morality to be done to you - this is a characteristic of society, either society adheres to this principle - a moral society, or it does not adhere, but a moral society, and then it turns into do it to another, before they managed to do it to you and history shows that an immoral society lose the civilizational race to the moral city of teotion, as it is now called on the territory of modern mexico, was a contemporary of ancient rome and equal to it in the number of inhabitants, or even the civilization with which we all live, teotihuacan has disappeared without a trace. there were no fortress walls, each quarter was a fortress. it was an immoral society. and finally the

viewer. uh residents. they just knocked each other out and what russia is now offering to the international arena is a community of sovereign states that do not do to each other what they do not want the russian kremlin of the ministry of foreign affairs to do to them. they are trying to offer to build a moral international community. here russia's offer today, otherwise without building such a community. we can't conquer space. russians, as usual, look into space, if we convey this to the youth , sovereignty and this picture of the future, like the conquest of space. we will not be afraid of information wars. okay, let's take a little while. let's take a break and get rid of cockroaches, at least these advertisements on ntv. forest fires arise through the fault of a person to stop and defeat the fire. a

strong vocation, forest firefighters of the protection of the federal forestry agency, 90 years on guard of the forests of russia on the air new unreal show avatar welcome to the new worlds i was here somewhere in that cosmic because of the underwater reality, where instead of the stars they sing their fabulous avatars with a light angelic voice, and the shrewd members of the jury sorcerer sounds like a spell i don’t know- i don't understand how

it is, but enjoy this voice of the premiere of a new original music show. it seems to me that this is the female avatar show you want to declassify right now. premiere on saturday 210 on ntv year of science and technology on the air program about how science will change our lives in the next 10 years in 10 years science is making information wars. well, our expert professor kapustin doubts this, the best tool in information wars is true. well, here's the problem. how to distinguish truth from lies? as doctor house said, everyone lies, never

trust one source of information, check the most dangerous source differently. these are not controlled media. this is an anonymous author. that is, you think that they are not controlled, in fact, they are sitting at the top, the puppeteer pulls the strings. a little more you can trust those sources that have many years of experience and are time-tested. the best is scientific publications that have been peer-reviewed and peer-reviewed. but here's the problem, it takes time to check. and we want to know the news every second, nevertheless, the means for separating lies and propaganda already exist. this system for processing large amounts of data, they allow you to separate the lies from the truth of the lambs from the kazlishch. one side. information. it pours, it pours, no one has time to think with the other sides. and such echoes are not difficult to deceive me. in general, i myself will be deceived here with pleasure anatoly ivanovich and why do people still so

unconditionally believe what is written, what is shown, especially if it is generally bad and stupid or terrible, well, yes, i argue all the time when he starts to warm. why is everyone yes eurasia all the many majority of americans? a typo and, or, so to speak, some manifestations of a stereotype, instilled in you over the years of training, it poured into me. of course, we are all products of someone's influence. we all impact products. and, for example, when we say to be deceived. yes, for example, i am a supporter of writing to her, as if from a tripod, on this topic, to develop a system of school discussion clubs. they bring different topics for discussion by schoolchildren with children, including high school students. but i would just like to bring in our problem with you, our problem with you

. the same informational inoculations should be made through the discussion of the institute of the school discussion club. and how to cut off the grains peeled off. here they don't know either, that's what we're talking about. today we already talked about the need for counter information and mandatory and our expert said, this is the key word. yes, true, true, when i looked into our russian history textbooks. not a single one in my hair moved, because it's a horror . we open a turn. here i am as a psychologist. yes, i do peer review on two pages up to 12 independent blocks of information that

are not interconnected. but this is for a ninth grader. this is me pro tutorial it's about my extensible well. here, for example, with this mikhalych i have a suggestion then, to get rid of this rubbish of the information flow, because you can just remove it then. uh, there is no information, information, no information war, chick, trump has no twitter, well , there is no such virus either. unfortunately. today it is impossible. there is such an option that will not help, it will not help at all, people are communicators. here first. what does the child learn. they just closed the child in kindergarten. misha, take the ball, tell the secret, people got something. they want it to spread the network - it's just a convenient way

to do it, it won't be something else on the network. what are people most interested in? you all know homer's odyssey, homer's poem about the return of odysseus home, and you know the legend of sweet pig sirens. yes, yes, with their songs they make the sailors lose their will, forget about everything, and the sailors' ships crash on the rocks, but what did the sirens sing. they are we promised the sailors that they would return home delighted and learned a lot, we know all the labors that the argives suffered three times by the vast will of the gods, just like the trojans know events that take place all over the world in modern siren languages. this is a news agency, that is, this period is almost 3,000

years old. well, how much people have changed in any way at all, in any way, do you think, like this, the chick and the hands will stop the same somehow no. well yes to us local device. this chik interrupts information flows, but nothing more, well then, andrey viktorovich and what modern technologies may appear in the next 10 years to make information wars, but become impossible, after all, before, for example, but how information was conveyed exactly by the depths. i caught it and closed it. and no information war for you. what will you do, what will help us, again, two categories of technology. the first is the technology of conducting counter-information operations, with the help of which states must protect their citizens from e -information operations. uh, opponents opponents. we are usually away from the operation of foreign intelligence agencies. they are built by and large , just like the operations used for

the attack, but the right moment is selected when these counter-information operations are launched into action and they hit weak points. these are the schemes that implement the second - this is psychological protection, and which again, first of all, the state should provide, but for its citizens, because only it can counter this aggression. and the more people will be protected than, and hmm, the more they will cultivate psychological stability information hygiene, and the better it will be good vyacheslav aleksandrovich well, look, it is believed that at the time of creation. ah, atomic weapons, yes, led to the fact that, a balance arose in the world and the third world war did not take place at all, because everyone understood that science could create a gift so that we already have information parity. and this was said by professor kapustin in

he said his speech, firstly, let's begin. the fact that information inoculations are nothing more than the result of conducting military actions of counter-war actions, the second, that is, uh, by managing information inoculations by limiting the information space. in my opinion, the problem is not solved. here in my opinion, this is because the information field. this is an analogue of a weapon of mass destruction only for the psyche, not for the biological. we have with you several examples of weapons of mass destruction in the first place, of course nuclear weapons, biological chemical everything was banned. as for nuclear weapons. it says agreed. it is not distribution and not application not application. otherwise it will be very responsible to make information dependence. we bombarded you with all the simple solution, it seems

to be a simple solution, and we forgot about your information. you call then the mass of weapons of the mass nickname is impossible the only way to agree. this unified information space is what the professor was talking about. what kind of unity is it, if everything belongs to us socially, and space is a single people live in the real world. you need to have huge systems. the internet allows you to remove a large amount of untruth. and lying is not enough. not enough yet. it is necessary to develop the moral aspects of absolutely correct filters that process this information and quite people. ok then. i have just a question for our guests, optimists from a skeptic to everyone. and today we talked about the information war well, against russia, but russia is katya, it’s me, it’s you, that is, in fact, it’s the information war is against

each of us. how is it necessary to create specially? well, i don’t know any organizations, i don’t know, public discussion clubs, where any person can come, please, an information war is being waged against him. or he believes that an information war is being waged against him, so that they would teach him somehow here what to do with it. you understand what's the matter. the fact is that the information operations that are carried out by foreign security companies, as a rule, rarely concern ordinary people. they are always aimed up to some decision-making leaders and in this respect, the information war is selective. you know, i don’t want to see you here the leader of the decision maker playing in one football club is attacking, against him a good attack against not just our sport and our football is an attack, i agree, i agree. so, uh, in order to effectively counteract the information warriors, a state system is needed, in addition to surgical attacks. there is also a war over the

squares. i speak as a witness now very there is a myth that the information war against russia started after crimea is a myth. i used to be there in december 2013, it so happened that i was in london copenhagen, not florida, and i saw how, within one week, all the western media exploded with russophobia. during the sochi olympics, winter russophobia was on the rise . yes, of course, sanctions against the russian ring, that's all. i yelled with a good obscenity, about this for the last 5 years. i am very happy that i finally found a society that recognizes the fact that against us the information war is going on. look here. i live in this state. we can say that if an information war is waged against us, it is waged. i am a citizen of this state. well , we had to take me somewhere, i need to go to be taught. so what about during the war? yes, if

a person suddenly felt uncomfortable fear. or a phobia arose in him about the informational impact that he experiences on himself , he must have opportunities. somewhere to come somewhere. call the helpline. yes psychologists. yes, first of all psychologists to lawyers. i would have pulled the blanket over myself a little. here , here i am, a psychologist spoiled by a legal education. so here, but in fact, in fact, this work should be, first of all , the system. secondly, it must be prolonged and, unfortunately, the state policy in this direction. i don't see yet. yes, we do not understand someone that a war is being waged, for some reason many shy away from the word ideology. and what is bad about it is good, the most important thing, what is useful here

science, and science is useful in that it puts terrible and informational operations on the shelves shows that at the heart of e, each of these operations lies. in general, very simple primitive schemes and, uh, these schemes are simple baits. uh, stimulants are very simple psychological effects, that is, uh, divorce john of people, they are actually built in combinations that are played literally on the fingers, but they are well disguised. and when you don't see it, i don't know, and you see, only the external entourage of some scandal, and you you come to a puddle and think that all e evil forces of the world. uh, now he will attack you when he analyzes the anatomy of fakes or the anatomy of an operation, such as the scandal with the panama dossiers or with the violins, it becomes clear that everything is very simple, but if you know how it is done, you won’t be bought into it and you won’t be hooked. and so you are protected. i still, of course, were still skeptical, our guests said today that

we are ordinary people participating in this information war. unfortunately. we are here and now, except for ourselves us. in general, unfortunately not, against there a particular politician or eminent person we are you so -called collateral damage. unfortunately, here dear guests are optimistic. well, what would we do, and the conclusion, but hmm in your opinion. what is the probability that information wars will still be impossible in 10 years thanks to science regarding mihajlovic, do you have a forecast? save and transfer, i would say 0 percent, but vyacheslav aleksandrovich shifted me by, say, 10%, because ideology determines the image of a person who should give education and maybe science in the next 20 e, 10 years will be able to give this image and i give 20% for this