when the religion of orthodoxy became, first of all, a social platform for the unification of pagan russia, why in an atheistic country , it was precisely the religious old believer past that could not become the basis for an ideological turn towards patriotism? but this turn of the state in the thirties cannot be explained by pragmatism alone. perhaps the aspirations of all the power of national values. that's how she pretended in life, once vera was taken away. and now she's back in a new guise. and now, if this line, how to continue, here was such a bishop, nizhny novgorod and kostroma and innokenty usov in the world, who became the metropolitan of the soviet period of time, he ended up in romania not by chance for a dispute with lunacharsky he was sentenced to death row. well, the old believers transported him there and just before the start of world war ii. e romania was on

the side of germany. anton invites lawsuits, blessing all the romanian born to fight against the soviet union. well, what is he printing? no i won't praise you throwing sentenced to death will not against russian. they will never fight against the russians. the fact is that we have up to the first half of the 17th century, inclusive, from ancient times to the first half of the 17th century. we don't have unsound sources. there are very few of them and any new source that would give us, well, some kind of insignificant narrative or other view of events. it's a sensation. they simply do not exist, and since the second half of the 17th century there are archives. they were simply not studied in the 18th century, the studied ones were introduced into scientific circulation, only 30%, 70 are still waiting for their researchers, and the closer we are to today,

the greater the source of his material. it will simply grow, like a snowball, as a result , conditions are created when the researcher today is in this sea of ​​sources. if he is engaged after the seventeenth century. he is forced to take some particular narrow issue to investigate it on some archival material and thereby introduce some kind of clarification. within the framework of a big big problem, but the problem itself, while he usually does not see these facts, which he brings. they are nothing give from the point of view of a holistic understanding of russia and here in this. e, in fact, the phenomenon on pyzhikovoj puts his talent in that, as a researcher who had i don’t know, so to speak, how much rational there is. how much irrationality was in him, apparently, both of them harmoniously combined and allowed him, in general, to claim to be quite original and holistic, i emphasize a holistic vision of the history of russia when we look into the past, it is difficult

not to interfere with the experience of today but to understand the past is to understand this present. xii century played in the collapse of the stalinist system and the ussr in general, and what is the role of western neighbors in the internal three-hundred-year-old confrontation these versions of alexander pyzhikov, in the next series we will also talk about his searches of recent years, and his latest developments, conjectures, theories that remained unfinished, how he lived and worked. iskal was mistaken, was fond of and found new details in the past, which helped him and us to understand the present and think about the future. literally

on the eve of his departure, we talked with him, he, in general, somehow planned to live on, but you know, a person sometimes feels his death. it was as if he came 4 days before his death to his native faculty, where he began to call. and it was some kind of sadness in his voice, indeed. it seemed to me that, probably, he, perhaps, felt something looked like. so it was like he was saying goodbye to me. and in this sense. eh, when he died, this tragedy, of course, became a very difficult topic for me, because it really is such a a person like alexander pyzhikov. eh, vanyusha-pyzhikov , i don’t know any more in my life. he conditionally said goodbye to his native university, as if he knew that he had a few days left to live. alexander bykov left the mass unfinished. in recent years, he was very worried about the fact that his work is often met with hostility in scientific circles. there was such a campaign on the internet that they almost called him an ideological saboteur,

what is sabotage here under the name of skiers? i talked to him on this topic already in the last years of his life, of course, he was very worried. he was very a vulnerable person. he suffered from the fact that, in general, he was so unfairly criticized and, moreover, not just criticized and defamated, but he continued to maintain his point of view and, in general, it must be said that a certain transformation of his views was taking place. on the one hand, there are such liberal conservationist ideas in the direction of such soil-based conservative ideas. he made an impression as a person. well, it might even be the honor of the day, and he's such a big, uh, round man. imi with gentle movements with soft, even with such a half-smile on her face, non-aggressive manner of presentation. well, because in general a deeply pleasant person. i communicated with him with great pleasure, but at the same time, of course, as well as such, i did not know any mercy. if he knew he was right, he, of course, hit back, not trying to create some kind of emotional effect from

a person who apparently understood the finiteness of his human life and understood that there was no time for nods and accuracy. just eat. if there is any idea about something, then you need it state it as clearly as possible. and with us, it often means as clearly as possible as harsh as possible, you talked about the main works of the historian of fawns in previous series. but what kind of person was this and what developments have not yet been completed. she left in a year, he said that he was rethinking many of his previous theories, he was finalizing the hypothesis, finding new documents in the archives and continued to work, despite critics and rejection of the audi part, as he had a chic library in our apartment, he studied. he just wrote out some of the notes in the books were written by hand.

the computer was never used. the notebook was 48 sheets large, and then he cut it all according to files, it was impossible to touch anything from his desk. that is, it was such an inviolable territory. the main thing that alexander pyzhikov tried to do in his works. this is to create a single set of history, to establish cause-and-effect relationships. a secret mechanism that launched a series of events that led russia to fatal turns. in all nodal even non-nodal problems in matters more than enough has been said of national history. this has already been written many times by many historians. touched all this serials. how many have already been filmed if we refer to today's day, all that tradition. e admiration. here are the key problems in

our history, it is based on a clear and definite interpretation, this interpretation was laid down. naturally, the ruling house of the romanovs e, starting from the moment when they, in fact, were on the throne. i mean, of course, the well-known events that went into the history of the naming of the unrest of the early seventeenth century, if collected. in general, karats, if only to gather all russian people for a long time in agreement. they are in a way with their swedes aquarius such a force is very popular, especially recently the topic of many books, as i said, are addressed, but we also decided to turn to it only a little differently e not to repeat everything that has already been heard many times and, in fact in one or another variation it is played out, but try to look at this turmoil

from a completely different, uh, angle of view. and this is possible only in one case, if some details that have eluded attention until now are brought to the fore and even then the very meaning of this stage is some ups and downs of this stage, they will sparkle with completely different colors. but in the last years of his life, the research of alexander pyzhikov led him to new, those, we even new eras. officially historical propaganda, they were more inclined to talk about the unity of the people and the ruling stratum around the throne and the altar. but, if we look at the history of our country through the prism of a split before a completely different story appears in rows, if we follow the course of thought of alexander pyzhikov, we will see that he managed to cover almost all centuries of russian history, and he began in the nineties from the twentieth century with the then fashionable theme of the khrushchev

thaw really. he was very obsessed. e study of these unknown questions. and then it was the time on the eve of perestroika, and then there were many dark spots in history just because they were hiding. this was also connected with the period means the thirties forties of the xx century and national history and with the period of the civil war of the revolution, but alexander was most fascinated by the period. sergeevich khrushchev because the period of sergeevich khrushchev closed certain holders. these are gunners, this is artillery, because, so to speak, they are clearing the way for our infantry, figuratively speaking, clearing the brains of those who have camouflage, so that you gunners brainwash their long-range artillery, but do not load, so the enemy did not shoot at their own. khrushchev

was overthrown at the time by the party leadership soviet union in october 1964, and much has been written about him. in general, he was quite biased and very superficially aware that nikita sergeevich khrushchev was not an easy person, that he was a complex person. this work caused a completely complementary remark, because it was in the spirit of the times, revealed unknown facts of khrushchev's reforms and did not put categorical assessments . this is a question of the fate of the people of the people of the hundreds of people of such a huge state. if you want the fate of our civilization alone, how to get there the process will go on, it will depend on where it will develop and how our entire civilization will develop, and this is not an ambition. it's just the reality of this country. an

atmosphere of uncontrollability and a lot of power arose in the country. everything, this cannot but cause widespread discontent among the population. about 30 in the yard of the nineties in the country large-scale changes and at this moment it is difficult to comprehend the rushing events of our time. well, in order to try to understand them, you can go to the past. where did the soviet project come from? how did he gain strength, how did a superpower arise, well, on this account has not been expressed over the past decades, only lazy full range of opinions are a whole set of different opinions expressed on still, but

the most popular, if i may say so, is such an explanation of the emergence and development of the soviet project, this is a group of e, and peoples and land forces that, by chance, have flown onto russian soil and arranged here such a revolutionary, as well as the russian people. or rather, a part of him , not a firm orthodox faith, supported this foreign one. prophetic grouping and actually saying did. this is a revolutionary coven. perhaps, in fact, such an explanation is popular in various circles. koi ranks himself among the true patriots of russia e. here, in fact, against e of this kind of thinking, they were conceived and made. uh, these books here are the facets of the russian split and the roots of stalin's bolshevism, khrushchev's reforms did not give an answer to the main question. why in russia of the xx century

the country of the russian empire fell apart twice in 1917 and the soviet union in 1991, however, modernity briefly captures the fawn as a whole and forces him to move aside the study of history in the late nineties in early 2000. he works in the government and in the presidential administration, he worked in the government apparatus. e, dealt with the education of science, and i must say that, uh, what impressed me anonich-pyzhikov when he was a high-ranking official compared to an official, that he never held on to this power, usually officials. i myself, also a former civil servant, can say one thing that people strive to get position to get power, and then they strive not to lose it, that is, for any official, a typical official. uh, in fact, first of all, the goal is to keep him in power, and already through this prism of this, through the prism of his fate, political statesmen. they are already solving all the other issues. that is, in general, alexander

vladimirovich did not absolutely hold on to his chair, for his post, at the beginning of the 2000s , such an administrative career began. he became the minister of science education oversaw higher school. and it would seem that he will go exactly on this path. but he had a stroke, which unsettled him. it took him a long time to recover from this stroke. and now, after he had already gone on the mend, he was already able to work. he decided for himself that his administrative career was enough, that he needed to deal with a real serious matter, and in fact, according to his father’s will, he began to study the topic that, in fact, glorified him, like the story of alexander in the early 2000s. pyzhikov leaves the civil service, in order to devote himself to science from khrushchev, he had to go deeper into the

history of pyzhikov, deals with the theme of the split of the 17th century. this, i believe, should be the next stage of research, that is, we are emitted from soviet developments about going to the people. uh, then going into schism we take this old believer old believer plast and study it. here i am, in the face of the russian split, laid the foundation for this, and this is not the last. and then we come to the very show how it was broken, peasant the people's memory was precisely in these years in 1870, then in 1880 - it was simply cleaned up. we need to show this, describe as much as possible, using a variety of sources, and only then a picture of the seventies. she will take her place in our history. here, in fact, these are the scientific horizons that we need to master; his book on the verge of the russian split gives society a new thesis. below me. it would seem a studied issue split. not just a religious conflict.

he divided russia into centuries. russia represented from itself, this is such a ruling stratum, which directed all the attention of researchers and a huge neck of the population, in fact, which researchers were rather little interested in before 1917, comrades of the peasant revolution about the need that the bolsheviks kept saying all the time made 2017 this year, who threw off all the masks and showed what russia is. these are not propaganda mirages of karamzin and other historians, but represent a completely different social landscape. it's not just an argument about how be baptized with two or three fingers. it's about how to position russia whether to let in western influence or to stay in its tradition. and so,

then the idea arose that there is no such stereotyped common path, the so-called civilized development, which embodies the western model from here as well. this is such a revival of interest every time it is a revival of interest. or maybe our specificity is very important. maybe we have some kind of value system that prevents us from actively use. here are these western democratic institutions. there's a lot of partisanship there, and so on and so forth, and that's why they don't work very well, and then a very serious problem arises. and what is our value system, is it really so sharply opposed to this principle of human rights. yes, the principle of democracy, the principles of a multi-party system, the principle of sovereignty of the individual, the sovereignty of the people. and if this is so, then we have a very tough choice before us is the path of exploration in the next century. skiers and follows the socio-economic situation in russia on the eve of the revolution a. then

they deduce the main thesis of their scientific research, anti-systemic and oppositional views. raskolnikov, for almost three centuries , formed a whole layer of anti-monarchist contradictions, and now, after centuries of uh, and. should, too, marveled at how easy it collapsed. uh, people's in quotes monarchy and people's church in quotes, how could this happen? here is the main question. and he suddenly built this line. she became for him, of course, and it really is everything is completely interconnected , nothing happens just like that, and he drew these few lines of force, he drew, and we are very much indebted to him for this. not only did he state some things himself to the utmost. precisely, he, of course, outlined the path along which one should comprehend to move. go there, there, and there, and now go along these paths and increase only from the array of evidence base that confirm the accuracy here. not all researchers agree with the point of view of

alexander pyzhikov, but only in disputes truth is born. that's what concerns speeches against the state machine from my point of view. this is not the main thing in the old believers. this is a forced situation. this is a forced measure. well, they forced me. and here i cannot agree with alexander vladimirovich, the old believers laid down the principle of unity with their state respect for their state. however, there are facts of the report of the synod after the events of 1905, which indicates that in the central provinces the peasants do not particularly revere the unofficial church, nor the sovereign, and on this background marxist ideas of justice penetrate the masses. deeper and deeper, that is, sparks of revolutionary sentiment fell on prepared soil, but pyshikov goes further and publishes a book that, by its very title, provoked attacks on the willow

version of the roots of stalinist bolshevism from various sides. by the way, i do not agree with many of his aspects of his concept, but i understand his fundamental significance, which consists in the fact that he enriched our perception of historical historical reality with what we really not at all today, this factor here is the old believers that, well, we actually remembered it once when we talked about the split, and then it’s clear that further persecution means self-immolation of siberia and that’s it. this factor from russian history disappeared; it simply did not exist, and fawns showed that, firstly, it was not that no one had disappeared. and that he was, perhaps, in the most significant factor in the events of the twentieth century, finally no one's head. i just didn’t even come to see, but these nominees they began to say by origin who? on

the air of ntv, an incredible music show you are super. you are super, new season. i look after her, nothing. and i keep looking young obzor like you come, the third time, stunned only joy. light new season 6 you are super sunday

22:20 on ntv indeed fawns were the first to notice that many stalin's people's commissars grew up in the old believer environment. and although the rites and faith went out by the beginning of the 20th century. the general mood remained evil empire, built on the ashes of true russia, justice is possible and necessary restore in order for russia to become a family again. well, you know odessa, so everyone, including isaiah, were greeks. also well, there lived a lot of bulgarians, therefore those who were not born greeks were born bulgarians, but it’s not serious, he took criticism of the fawns

too close to his heart, but did you manage to break him, this work can also be considered as a step in the implementation of one its important task at one time, was very clearly formulated by the soviet leader andropov in 1983. he noticed how we do not know the country in which we live and urged us to make every effort to understand our historical path today after decades have passed. looking at what happened to our country, it is still clear that russia's cure from the civilizational disease that struck her is not felt without understanding the past. impossible in principle for some, this work of fawn has become just another reason for criticism, but for many it has become a discovery. in it, the historian managed to put the puzzle of russian history into a single picture, otherwise it is difficult to understand why the peasants are so easily bolder. monarchy. why a peasant youth? yesenin raising

his pants to run after the komsomol and many more other facts that the revolution is not just a coup. well, what difference does it make with two or three fingers, by and large, yes, clockwise counterclockwise, etc. here, of course, this is not the question, but people understood that something else was coming after this. that is, the question is the church. she is with the people of the rice state with power. they are old believers, of course , for that original democratic character, defending their freedom to worship. they defended their right to participate in this and be an active participant in church life, too, when nikon began to wrap up and took away. this right, then, of course, through this they felt that a dictatorship is going on here and the church is becoming from an instrument of saving people, an assistant to people, into an instrument of suppressing them, a church that blesses serfdom in russia in the 17th century. it became

obvious bait. at least from peter the alternative in russian history. in general, it disappears, it becomes this story, of course, gloomy. this is history. here is such an uh, full of hopelessness, when there is some real way out of the situation, but only in october. relatives remember fawn, as a happy person, his hobby and work coincided with the best rest. this is the study of new historical documents, finds, new facts and paradoxical coincidences. he liked to invite to a good cafe restaurant to chat, he liked to treat friends. eh, loved it. uh, such friendly parties where he presented his books, where he shared his thoughts and i must say that we always amazed at how locally he gushed with them and communication with him brought great joy, great pleasure. many people loved him, and they loved his kindness for his opinion, his

disinterestedness for his directness. and he really was such a person who did not seek to use people in any way, he sought to help people. he tried to give people what to give, he told me, i’m a little tired, i can’t. so impossible to work. you need to arrange some kind of day off for yourself. well didn't like to rest rest for he had books and i think, sasha how happy he is. now he will sit down at his favorite book at the computer at the paper, and, as it were, he will begin to write new studies. including peter moscow, the fight for russia at the confrontation between two models of capitalism on the eve of the revolution and the rise over the abyss about the economic breakthrough of the russian empire on the eve of the first world war,

the last three decades of imperial russia appear before the reader, here are unresolved centuries-old problems and attempts at an industrial breakthrough and the struggle of aristocratic merchants and governments and finally west for which russia was varnish. the transformation of the beginning of the twentieth century can be qualified as the most ambitious in the entire history of the existence of russia in these books, fawns are again looking for traces of a split in russian society, well, really capitalism. peter and moscow differed greatly in the capital of western banks, the capitals of the concession and the hand of the state. in moscow, the business of merchant communities is predominantly old believer and the merchant's word of honor instead of complex legal contracts. some historians before end disagree. but they don’t agree with the idea that was laid down in my books, what was it worth emphasizing so much? this is the

rivalry between st. petersburg and moscow but this is a relief, it is taken not from desire, not from some other reasons, but from the material, since moscow and st. petersburg are really such two models of russian capitalism that existed together and not just exist. or did st. petersburg really compete - it's more like that, of course, the administrative capital is administrative. uh city uh cosmopolitan, since all foreign entrepreneurial forces, starting from peter i and andovna, when st. petersburg became the capital of the russian empire, concentrated precisely there in the capital, since everyone was tied to court circles to the aristocracy, which, of course, started to hurt , and not anywhere else moscow - it's something, of course different. eh, it's not power. well, here is less pomposity. this is merchant capitalism which has grown from the depths. e russia in the domestic market from here, the growth here he drew his strength. it

again, here is a conflict from the seventeenth century, who is looking to the west, who relies on his own strength, this is still in our days. actually, this is not a religious, but an ideological split, that is, such a dramatic hamletian choice between e. have its e civilizational matrix. and this is the matrix what kind of collectivism that opposes individualism is catholicity, which is understood as something opposing, but hmm to the personal principle, yes, and at the same time, the rejection of e, the principles of human rights, freedoms of democracy and so on. but then accept please, gulag archipelago and all other things. now with a new host. meet iosif prigogine lyudmila gurchenko's granddaughters threaten to deprive her grandmother of her parents, i knew, i'm sorry

. her own daughter. will 14-year-old taisiya be better off in a state-owned house than you love yesterday with your mother? she turned the apartment into a landfill for the heiress of the people's artist, you yourself don't want to clean up all this mess, who was found in the bed of the great-granddaughter, gurchenko, the child sleeps on bedbugs. he does not look, but it will bite. and what will the alcohol test show and prohibited substances. mom needs a psychologist 100%. stars. they agreed on sunday immediately after super ntv in the case of the murder of the head of the menacerechensk, while these people are not in their places in the life of the city for the better, nothing has changed

. he explores russian epics and finds in them the unexpected absence of the people of koschey there are bogatyrs, but they seem to be in the void. they fight with a friend. i believe that pyzhikov is, of course, an outstanding representative patriotic historiography, not in everything. i agreed with him, and some points of his reasoning. they did not convince me very much, but i did not reject them out of hand, because. i believed that he determined, as it were, a new vector for the study of certain issues of certain problems. unfortunately, there are fewer and fewer historians who go into science, namely for the sake of science, who are ready to study these very controversial and very little studied topics, but i hope that this is the direction of his research, it will find its own

successors, and already before his death, about a year before his death, he dealt with completely different issues related. well, how would we say now with the physical aspects of russian. uh, with religious culture, he collected rich material related to the pancake epic with the system of ancient russian or there ancient slavic conspiracies of traditions and rituals, if you do not freshen up the psychology for a lot of decades before the war, then rather only with what was kept in the distant minds of the towns you are looking for white water lakes brightly went for one, that is performance on earth, but you have to go there first. not finding it, of course. this is a

familiar consciousness not only for russian old believers. and for whomever you want, at the heart of any religion is the understanding that then there will be an ideal life, a person always comes up with something beautiful for himself later, and for us this is the first time the appearance of the table in real form.

slavic fault is the name of one of his last works. this is me again, the confrontation between west and east. only this time, don’t see the roots of the schism of the eighteenth-century church, donuts see how he sees the forerunner of civilizational cataclysms on the path of russia, that the reason for the split itself is the penetration into the church and state structures under tsar alexei mikhailovich. natives of the western slavic lands, including from ukraine, which in the middle of the 16th century moscow returned to their native harbor, well, in ukraine for several centuries, who were in the western catholic influence, much has changed during this time and this influence explains a lot of the actions of people not only of the seventeenth century , but also the next centuries will be up to today

days. he, of course, spoke directly, but he did n’t violate the polish-ukrainian invasion, maybe he formulated it radically on thursday. but he designated, as a matter of fact, the problem. uh, what happened, uh, in the 17th century in connection with the split, that is, there was some kind of split. people do not give themselves an account that then, in fact, they were excommunicated from the church, that is, they were turned off from the system, in general, the social life of being, not even the everyday life of being there, plus or minus with half of the population of russia, all those who did not accept nikon's reform of the state reform transformation in the church. they said that well, we turn everything off. everything turned out, half of russia just went on a walk and at the same time a colossal amount of the church apparatus, but it began to call in from the west, including from the territory of present-day ukraine , the administrative structures of russia. diocesan administration were part of the staff of the court clergy, led

theological academies and seminaries, which in for the most part, they were filled with pupils called from little russia. these are extremely curious topics that give completely unexpected shoots and overgrowth after 100-200-300 years and will give us a teleconference program and be surprised there, and it turns out that this is there. well, not straight lines, of course. you can't draw a straight line of force here. here, like this, here, like this, but nonetheless. there, as it were, logic begins to draw its own. you are never inside this logic. you here will reduce begin to be surprised. indeed, he looked differently in many respects. he showed, in general, the role of the old believers as such bearers of the original russian traditions, uh, which, in general, were not, uh, perceived by westerners, and showed that westernism everything came from ukraine at that time, because the kiev mogilyanskaya theological academy was, in general, such a generator of pro-western

ideas that penetrated the territory of what was then russia in the middle of the 17th century, just this coincided with the period of entry, which means eastern ukraine into composition of russia e, the famous russian-polish war movement. cossacks under the leadership of bohdan khmelnitsky and it all went in parallel and soon. after these events, there was a church schism of the reform of patriarch nikon, and then, uh, serfdom intensified, and he ascended from the other side somewhat. he saw the ukrainian world, not a solid business. he saw it in the 17th century, the process of integration we tea little russia, so to speak, here the process of historical restoration is going on in a single family of east slavic peoples territories to mongolian russia, but jesuit-catholic tentacles, there they process turita on the territory, but today you look how western europe influences trying through sanctions on russia, who is the main entertainer there again, poland is brain-set, of course, like

this pitted. here is still there, and in the 16th-17th centuries it was the jesuit school of the catholic protestant then later, that they are to this day from this captivity, and not to escape. shortly before his death, alexander pyzhikov shared with friends the ideas that he wanted to take up the era of leonid brezhnev and this surge of interest is surprising, but not knowledgeable. in fact , in the work of pyzhikov randomness was not, he developed his concept in this concept of the ukrainian origin of the soviet general secretary. his environment played an important role. it is not given to us to predict how convincing pyzhkov's new version would be, and what hypotheses of his own would he subsequently revise or modify? by and large, the task of any scientist is not to give answers to all questions and fawns did not give them in your time. you know, there was such a stupid person. he was his name in the 19th century. karl marx he

once remarked that it was right to ask a question. this is to ensure 80% of the effectiveness of his solution. here is the task of the researcher to correctly pose the problem and stimulate research research by indicating some main directions. here, walking on this one, dear. you will come to true understanding. here the merit of fawn is that it allows us to correctly take into account factors that we did not take into account before, they turn out to be significant and taking into account these factors. it will allow us , in the scientific reflection of historical reflection, to work out the creation of such a new conceptual rethinking of the history of russia on september 17th. in 2019, alexander pyzhikov, as usual, came to the state archives to study new documents. he felt sick at his desk. he died. that same evening, a blood clot broke off. alexander pyzhikov was

only 53 years old, but how much he managed, unfortunately, he did not create his own scientific school. i told him about it . uh, what does sash need? he'll do it later, well there was no time, because he was really a workaholic and did not rest anywhere. in fact, he didn’t travel all the time, he disappeared, sometimes in libraries, sometimes in the archives, of course, with shortcomings, but it has the main thing, it awakens the need to search for research. it becomes a starting point for many. researchers who, even denying this work of pyzhikov, but also i, will come from it to what

was really. in general, we can say that if he didn’t create a complete one, but he outlined, like this, but a new original concept historical development of russia, unfortunately, he did not have time to complete it. well, to formalize, that is, to express it here in such a finished work of the history of russia, nevertheless, in a number, including the transmission of public lectures, he is very active, he is a media person. it is contour and different genre. this is such a holistic vision of the history of russia that he certainly created and emphasizes here today. in fact, there is no one to compare him with. even after leaving , alexander pyzhikov remains with us. quite recently , a book was published that collected his lectures, recorded for the internet. the secret of two revolutions book and current. in it, literally day by day , the events that led russia to the february and then the october revolution are restored, the trail from 1916 of the fawns is counting down the events that made

the seventeenth year an inevitable and turning point in russian history, here are contradictions in the elites and contradictions in the business interests of the oligarchs of the west and domestic businessmen a series of errors of complex games, a betrayal of stupidity and sincere hopes. russia, i formulated it for myself a long time ago that russia forever, that here we are at a certain time, there in 202122. we actually have a context. here are the events of the 9th century, the twelfth, fifteenth, seventeenth and 22nd centuries. it's all up to the moment, here and now we are inside it all. and uh, if we perceive, it's just some kind of storm, it's dark and the sky is covered, then, of course, we won't understand anything, in fact, this has a certain system. and here it is in that sense. personal reasons within russian history, alexander pyzhikov once again proved to us that there is no past, there is a past that constantly lives in the present every day. giving us food for

thought about today teaches us not to make past mistakes. but is bykov capable of teaching, did he believe that he would give knowledge about the past? let us try the ability to go into the future confidently in memory of it.

hello on the air their morals and i am their host dmitry zakharov average life expectancy of 30-35 years mass repressions, torture and executions constant epidemics of war and massacres religious intolerance. i'm talking about no country third world and describe europe only medieval modern country finland. it is extremely comfortable, maybe that's why men just love to plunge into the middle ages with modern people from the past, correspondent kirill

zvyagin spoke to the man of the future middle ages, in front of the priest is an old wagon, followed by nuns merchant knights and other citizens of the times of dragons and castles, the finns walking together sang ditties and shied away from passing public transport, having made a circle in the city center, people from the past went to the turku market square and dispersed in a crowd of modern onlookers. the finnish city of turku, like the rest of the planet, is the 21st century, and the middle ages have come to the old market square in the next four days

. medieval music will be played here, dance medieval dances, play scenes from tajik life, and some will even be able to try on a medieval suit, which is important to sit. once a year, the provincial turku plunges deep into the centuries in the market square of the city, people wander, as if descended from the pages of chivalric novels. trading shops open on the square itself, where they sell souvenirs under the middle ages and put up tents in which they prepare medieval delicacies. howling ideas of the fair to hold such a cultural event for the townspeople, which would not make anyone bored. fighting boredom by any means good residents, turku chose the most extraordinary like people from time to time falling into childhood. once a year they easily and naturally fall into the past to organize such a

fair. clap main bottom 500 years what were the morals what costumes? their participants in the medieval show sew themselves because the people they are creative and law-abiding sneak away, quietly from the local museum. nothing will become theft prefer the needlework of this dress. i bought in tallinn, bought jewelry there, then i came home, sat down and made myself a suit. i had to spend a whole day. the participants of the holiday were not only fashion designers themselves, but also make-up artists in those distant times, people used fists and swords every now and then. bruises and abrasions on their faces were drawn by the participants with their own hands, and so professionally that this mabe seems completely natural. i wish bruises are not needed on the holiday. i am

a large landowner, a feudal lord, and in life a theater actor. charming annie in ordinary life works in one of the local offices of the medieval fair. great chance for her. change environment and profession was an office lady became an oracle predict the future the process of predicting a very simple person. you need to come here to choose one of the cards presented here, call the fortuneteller, who will already tell what awaits in the future. i personally like it here. picture number 18 is with these dogs howling at the moon, please, tell me what this means. that now you are in a transitional period for you, you are on the verge of something very important, therefore, accepting that or any other decision, you must weigh it carefully. for a festival of fairs in the medieval

style, turku is the most suitable place. this city was a major trading center already in the thirteenth century, and the art of steel forging was among the finns and even to this day the ancestors of the blacksmith dynasty exist, which were made by our excellent navels even before batu attacked russia and today they are being made. using the same technologies, craftsmen throw some roots, dried herbs, powders into the molten metal. everyone has their own recipe, they have their own handwriting like this a finnish knife, a real work of art, however, and it costs, accordingly, it is made according to the technologies of the eleventh twelfth century and fantastically sharp. the boy receives the first finnish knife as a gift at the age of 3, the second at the age of 10 and has not parted with it all his life and mind you in a country where every man has a knife with no stabbing. wild expanses of west africa he

is on the paved northern europe the fair is so fascinated that it comes here for the third year in a row. very, very well organised. so great, very interesting and tasty delicious. this is about medieval fast food, pork on a skewer, looking at this fat splendor at once forgetting sho insidious cholesterol and fashionable vegetarian diets, however, fans of the plant menu at the fair will also find something to eat. for example, finnish pancakes are baked, though they are not in a stone oven and not on a fire, but on a dirty gas stove, but such, the truth of modern life does not bother anyone, after all. the main thing is to get plenty of bread and circuses. visitors to the medieval fair can not only buy souvenirs from the middle ages, but also

get pleasure from a butt on the head, by the way, a completely free highlight of the program. the main spectacle of the season is a theatrical performance about the difficult life in the middle ages. everything that happens on the stage is very reminiscent of the rehearsal of performances from the immortal comedy. watch out for the car. the only difference is that all the lines are spoken by the actors in finnish to strangers. the meaning remains inaccessible, even sign language translation does not save. but every viewer. if desired, he can become an actor, since the action of the performance is now and then transferred from the stage to the auditorium during the intermission, instead of pilgrimage to the buffet, the obligatory medieval chants were washed down in the girls' choir. elvira does not rush to the professional stage in ordinary life, she works as a nurse and does not complain about her share. you below just gives the girl pleasure. and improves mood. i like medieval music

i like modern modern music, it's just more sophisticated, and medieval music is more for the soul. for for those who thought the spectacle was not enough, the organizers of the fair for dessert present a real knight's tournament to a dozen local enthusiasts, crammed into dilapidated armor and armed with swords, enters the field, scolding ready to chop each other into a small vinaigrette, only heart-rendingly. the host of the tournament prevents them from doing this. the modest farmer demo-yuri for the duration of the medieval fair reincarnates into the arbiter of the arena of death at the end of the demonstration battle demo-jure showed us the entire knight's arsenal all the weapons the present. here, look at the spear, of course, it's stupid, but the wound can be inflicted. be healthy. for all the time of the knightly tournaments in turku, the turks

did not really hurt anyone, only once one unlucky knight, an accountant by profession , had to go to the local emergency room. poor fellows, accidentally broke a few fingers. but now the modest shield grower has something to remember to get a wound at a knightly tournament of the 21st century - this must be managed, however, there is something to remember for all the other participants and spectators of impressions, enough for a whole year, and exactly 12 months later at the same place, at the same hour. everything will be repeated again in a turku in a small finnish town, the good old, middle ages will come again. our today's program has come to an end. travel with us. travel yourself.