and they give a thousand rubles for fuel for the show of the avatarbanist song what is this thing under the roof that no one can hear? i would even say that our heroes are simply masterfully introducing space technology by the nose of a member of the jury. oh, absolutely alive, as if you know this girl marvel at your talent to confuse us at the premiere of a new original music show. adventures of avatar on saturday 21:00 on ntv the man goes under the operational pseudonym as a snake agent from the reels.

oh, listen, unhijacker.

they say the world is ready for a technological parade sovereignties. in what industries? we have almost everything for independence and in which we are still excruciatingly painful. why is the so -called diamond technology fund being created and how is cooperation being rebuilt, where artificial intelligence is already masterfully manipulating people. what social networks. and why not say hello soon, let's talk about it with dmitry dmitry nikolayevich , the president's special representative for digital and technological development that, well, to the fullest extent, it is impossible nowhere in china it is not, in the usa it is not, it will be what you say, it's true. there is not a single party in the world

that could say that it is technologically sovereign, first of all, we are talking about microelectronics. and there are pieces of this technology only in individual countries, for example, the most important e -machine that allows you to print circuit boards. this means the so-called monometers there, which means less than 10, here is the center for the production of such machines and it is distributed between holland and belgium and this here is one place in the world where i can make such meta-graphic machines, and another piece of this technology. it has only two other countries there in japan and israel hmm and the us nile is neither in china nor in russia and taiwan of the whole cycle, which means there is no production cycle, the key technologies of sovereignty, and this technology is associated with the provision of energy. well, we should be fine here. yes, and here we differ

radically from the vast majority of expensive countries, because a for this historical period. even if you stretch on there relatively speaking, 50-70 years ahead and look at the global warming situation to everyone else, then i guess i would say that there are only two countries in the world that have, uh, all the major groups. e energy technologies. this is russia a and the united states a country that claims to be independent, well, in a number of areas, at least, a should have. uh, the necessary set of tools, appropriate in order or something to think about. eh, some tools to tweak some potentials, also increase the potential. it's all right with the tools, of course yes. we either don't have the tools, or they are in

the process of being created. it's not a fast business. well , for example, and for example, that for us, probably, one of the most painful things is machine tool building and mechanical engineering. here is the creation of e tools of production of the means of production, in marxist language. of course, we have it, uh, hmm , the machines that other machines make have practically not developed over the past 30 years. this is probably, but the main strategic deficit, which is impossible, but to close in the short horizon not a year ago and most likely never, and this means that in part, but in mechanical engineering, we need to negotiate with other countries in the same way that other countries need to negotiate with us with other countries. all this will always be a question. and the chains to the operation we are, all the

more so, the world is now divided into friendly and unfriendly to us, strange, too, the potentials of these countries are different, holders of different technologies are correct. now three main processes are actually going on in parallel. the first process is called relocation, the second is a just sovereign, production and the third process is such a restart and operations. for example, for russia, such a process is now extremely typical for civil engineering. uh-huh, that is, here we have some partners. here is il-96,400. yes, we do it ourselves. yes, it means dry superjet. we replace imports by producing in fact or by location using critical technologies. this is american bionics. we refuse french engines. we refused. for example, uh, wide body for the mainline liner, there

cr919 we are designing together with china, here it is example in practice on aircraft. how are these three strategies simultaneously implemented in terms of manipulation, artificial intelligence, a penalty thing, yes. well, the most powerful example. what can be said about such manipulations, probably the biggest manipulation in the world. it happens when we take a photo on the phone, there is a provided artificial intelligence, which firstly takes a photo until the moment you press the button, but in fact these photos have already been taken. he understood what you were filming. yes, this offer was opened, but he has already begun. secondly, he picked. and as for the color reproduction and that's

it. the rest is not how he sees it in reality. and since you like it, you personally, that is, flattering flattering flattering, you bastard. yes, people for what such incentives, so that you like it, so really. uh, i think 95% of the power of artificial intelligence in the world. today works on absolutely primitive. and things like stroking. yes , to please you. today, this is a huge server capacity, frankly spent they say, and we spent them on something more useful. we would already be there, i think about the emblems of the queen of oncology there, or something else, we would have allowed the process of creating a diamond fund and technologies a long time ago. yes. and why is he needed? yes, and what should form the basis in our understanding, yes, that is, there, apparently, this is being created in all countries of the world that strive for their own logic . yes, that means, if something is missing for you,

you can change it, right? and when we talk about a civilization of rapidization, you know what we are, and we refuse to trade, on the contrary, we increase the share of trade, but at the same time this trade is honest, so that some third person. he couldn't do it. it means at some point to call, because he does not like it. he shook hands and agreed, so, uh, exchanged. well, for example, russia is the only vera country that has floating technology there. there are stations there, and this technology has a great future, the ability to deliver energy to the right place at the right time. becomes incredibly important, but we see today the situation in europe is exactly about this, we do not need to reach for those technologies that, as it were, are not our strong point, but look. uh-huh no need to waste energy on this, but he develops what

we do best. here's what you prefer. ah, or do you understand the decision of where to spend the money? yeah, you have a way to order a medicine from a pharmacy, where you pressed the button on the phone, and after 5 minutes they brought you the medicine, one second option is that in the pharmacy you invest that there will be medicine in the pharmacy an easier option, but it guarantees the availability of this drug seemed to be, and this is a key choice. so you either invest money in accessibility, or in what it is in principle. there will be uh-huh and this is a discussion that we have very actively going on among experts among managers, and of various ranks, but in fact, it is about this, uh-huh. in my logic. most importantly,

the consumer quality of the coming decades is reliability and russia is one of the very few countries in the world, as you have already been told, which is able to give its citizens. this is the most reliable digital environment - this is such an environment that is very subject to emotional movements, statements, and so on and so forth, here's how to solve this problem, it was through social networks that fakes were spread, including special military operations about what was happening around them, of course , here the key questions are the question of the controlling algorithm. well, if a simpler normal state cannot afford to exist on its territory, social networks, which a-a, controlling the algorithm, it is foreign. what is the controlling algorithm that forms our news feed, whose messages should be shown in priority? and you open a social

network. and your entire catastrophe feed is gone , which means, but you don’t know if this is really the opinion of your entire social network or is it, uh, an algorithm that artificially selects a polar opinion and shows it to you. we figured it out with one kind of social network, even with two it seems. there are, of course, lovers of vpn services, which one way or another here is banned by tens of millions of people. yes, it's, well, it's kind of normal once again access to information. this is such hmm well, quite a fair desire of a person. yes we are each of us assumes a base. what i wo n’t succumb to manipulations, of course, is his organized being. yes, in fact, practice shows that if you are in this environment there are

comrade boys, then you are being manipulated by the state balancing between the tasks of manipulation and the tasks of access to basic information services. this is a difficult compromise situation in which there is no such uniquely guaranteed solution. so you say you need an algorithm. here we need a domestic algorithm. we are capable of creating this. yes, there are no problems at all, the question is precisely the recruitment of an audience and the fact that they are taken away, which means that what is called being in this social network was easy and pleasant. uh-huh yeah , well, because, of course, but impossible. you know , uh, there, and banned instagram has invested billions of dollars over the years. yes and the best the minds of the world gathered in teams that

created it like this, you can’t replace it with a click, you don’t have to be deceived yourself. there is no need to be extreme, but naive, but this is some path that needs to be taken. china, i have already passed it. in general, quite successfully means, and well, we will pass. well , let's tinker a little. uh-huh, but in general, in principle, e since the social network is such an evil. this can somehow form some kind of public opinion, that yes, guys, is this evil something that needs to be abandoned somehow or is it necessary? just technology some kind of creation of social networks that will not manipulate you like that, of course, the technology itself is neutral, but the question of the value picture of the person who owns the keys to it, well, it’s not the gun that shoots the person that shoots, of course, you are absolutely right. and yes, there is a position that the future belongs to centralized networks. when you yourself control what is happening around you

, it is another matter that right now it is the big five. that's where google sneakers and facebook amazon they gained such strength, they became so big monopolies that they hold on to the end. that's for this advantage. but if you ask what the geopolitical and climate logic is stronger or what means the interests of the shareholders of these five corporations, i would still bet on nation states. therefore, i think that the age is here, but of centralized control over social networks on a global scale. it ends, of course, but it has not yet passed. here is the phase. yes, they are still very strong, of course, of course, but now they are trying to cope with the american national state. let's see how they do. come on wholesale, we will use or chinese experience, of course, the alarm is the largest uh it company in