so well, what is the solemn ceremony in the kremlin over? let's then do it as follows, so we have time until 18:00, again we are working live. and as i understand it, we are now watching in all regions simply in connection with the significance of the event. so we can safely say that we have a special edition of the meeting place program. so, our uh, sources

turned out to be, uh, more accurate, uh, the president's speech, in general, lasted about 43-44 minutes, and hmm for me, maybe not even the president's speech, it turns out a little less, because together with the signing for me, maybe not uh. well, i think unexpectedly, because i thought that it would be longer, but i'll tell you, but we had a conversation with you just now. i would like you to share your first impressions now too. i would not say, well, it would be practically the end of the president's speech. i'm speaking as far as i understand. that is, this is what i always put in and at the beginning of the program today i said there will be no statement from putin today. that is, it was a speech that once again explained to us why we actually act in this way now. and you said that, ah , you agree with this, but very, very tough

emotionally, which is not easy. why do we act this way. and why and with whom we are not afraid of this word, it seemed to you more, uh, i am describing my own impressions. i'm on my mind now. this is one of the most emotional and one of the toughest speeches of vladimir putin that sounded for as long as he is in power. again, i heard so many warnings about that side in this. to be honest, at some point we were listening here behind the scenes to some whispering something else, and then everyone froze. i don’t know, because i took it somehow differently as a doctor, because i told you that i was some kind of such a threat there, yes, always there, that russia hasn’t left, we don’t need russia, we need me i didn't hear it, but i said that the performance inspires confidence, it's just that you feel, i don’t know how it is with you , the blood starts to run faster somehow, because, apparently, it has been accumulating for so long. this is the desire to

hear the supreme commander-in-chief with such a speech. and so it happened and so, let's have you now then we will analyze all this in detail. here are some of your impressions. let's come for antonchenko. well obviously the message is the main message of this speech. he was ideological so he wasn't specific about what we'd do yeah and it's obvious why because you can't was to announce any? specific stomach realized that, perhaps, it would be strange, but a solemn ceremony either for specific actions. e at the front or learn about some decisions later. that is tomorrow the day after tomorrow. but what vanya says is very tough, and i absolutely and directly agree that a super tough performance in relation to. west west, in fact called the enemy of the west brought. and just as historical uh things are crimes here, so because of the

modern ones it is built into a logical chain. that there is this rather frank speech, because politicians of this level usually try to smooth things over, because they always think that there are still some grounds for further dialogues. and those angles can get in the way. and when in this case he said that we are ready for negotiations we are ready for negotiations, but in this case there are no illusions that and now we are corners, but these battles with the bed, that for this they will not talk to us, and was it possible to smooth them out at all anton valerievich when in the country of partial mobilization, but firstly, of course, it was inexpensive and absolutely objective. uh, and ah, the picture and assessment that was given by the president in this case, well, the situation is indeed difficult to some extent, difficult to some extent. this is an existential choice. the country is faced with the question of the existence of the country; in fact, it does not mean that tomorrow russia will not be under this. well

, this means that the fork in this way has already gone through all the points so, uh, all the rubicons have been passed in such a way that yes. what next it's either this or that. so, of course, a very clear assessment with the eyes. you, uh, emphasized our conditions. you said that the president said very calmly that we are ready for negotiations, but on our terms. this means that those of our new territories that russia has grown today are today a historic day. i congratulate you all. congratulations on this event, which is a discussion about territorial integrity. russia is out of the question. she's on our terms. we will discuss how interact between the russian state and ukraine if she finally does not understand that she is now not just a vassal, but she is just a place, that is, our negotiating position has become so much stronger and absolutely. although more severely. moreover , i want to say that i today, uh, well, to

be honest, i felt quite proud. you know such a strong one inside yourself, because i see a worthy president. these are our countries, which very clearly explain our position from a historical point of view from an economic point of view from fundamental point of view. and today we saw and for the first time heard an assessment of our past. after all , we, in fact, vladimir vladimirovich said, we were in fact a colony since the nineties. hmm, and now, in fact, it was said, and now you just need to recover, you need to stand up and say firmly that now we are another russia that must be reckoned with and russia that ready for negotiations in parallel in parallel while listening to all sorts of telegram channels, i don’t remember now where i came across this one, they didn’t want to listen munich speech. here, listen to what was said. thank you for this speech. vladimir alexander nikolaevich was very impressed. well, if we

talk about some nostalgic feelings, if they can be allowed, otherwise i heard something similar in the second. e mid-second half of the eighties. uh, when uh, for a number of reasons , was forced to study the materials of the congresses of communist parties 24-25, tonality, in principle. the same tonality of andropov in 1983, and when it was said about the need to confront the west and when the world for some time stood on the brink of nuclear war, what did it seem to me? e hmm in general, it’s quite important, but the president practically doesn’t mention ukraine. so, therefore, this means a new round and a new stage.

the president doesn’t even mention, practically, europe. a certain beacon of liberation from american dependence. if i lived in america and would be an american political analyst. i would take it as an announcement america’s wars are veiled, whether or not it’s direct yes, not in the sense that tomorrow a submarine will sail somewhere and some kind of missile will be launched, but in fact we can try to save suffering europe from these sufferings, but comrades from washington hope, a here on the site of kiev well, here i would have heard some options, here i agree with you. it seems to me that the negotiation is fundamentally not a mention. ukraine is better than any mention, when the negotiations are all clear. well, there is another problem here. eh, even if in kiev, for example, if there were forces and people, uh,

who would be ready to negotiate territorial concessions, then i think that these people would not live 24 hours after their statements, they would simply be torn apart. let's wait, because andrey vladimirovich says that at 17 moscow time, the national security council will meet there, and in kiev, the national security council. and if they get together at 17, maybe even dance that you're on the air, let's not get something from the news. here we are, uh, the most, as it were, here are the main main ones to take such a piece, but we took it out of president's speeches. and now we'll show it to you, it 's big, but this is just hmm, the fragment that can be used. trying to determine, here we really are today let not literally, but presented some kind of ultimatum e, or not yet. give us, please, this whole piece, where there is no soviet union and before, uh, the possibility of negotiations

. we do not strive for this. well, there is nothing stronger than the determination of millions of people who, in their own way, culture faith traditions language consider themselves part of russia whose ancestors lived in the united state for centuries there is nothing stronger than the determination of these people to return to their true historical fatherland for a long 8 years people in the donbass were subjected to genocide by shelling and blaming, and in kherson and zaporozhye they were tried criminally nurture hatred for russia for everything russian. already in the course of referendums, the kiev regime threatened to kill school teachers , women who worked in the election commission, intimidated with repression millions of people who came to express their will, but not broken people

of donbass zaporozhye kherson said their word. i want the kiev authorities and their real masters in the west to hear me, so that all the people living in lugansk, donetsk, kherson and zaporozhye will remember this and become our citizens forever. we call on the kiev regime to immediately cease fire all hostilities in the war that it unleashed back in 2014 and return to the negotiating table. we are ready for this it has been said more than once, but the choice of the peoples of donetsk luhansk zaporozhye kherson will not be discussed. it's done. russia will not betray him. not all greetings, because

here i am sure that now this performance was watched, everywhere, of course, but several times. even in this fragment, the president repeats there the inhabitants of donetsk lugansk e-e kherson zaporozhye and the inhabitants of nikolaev. you saw the pictures now the guys are running around nikolaev behind closed faces and hanging up such, and chips, and on october 10, 5:00 am. wagner, our oxidizers, now they are listening and asking themselves questions. i want too return to their historical homeland in my real president's speech, this was not, probably, again intentionally. well, nevertheless, the possibility of different interpretations. i wouldn't say that i'm presiding in speech. it wasn't, but he doesn't name those uh, what does he refer to? well

, yes, where we have the novorossiysk university is located in odessa the word novorossiya, which he returned the political volume for the first time, he is the last. yes, yes, the second time he returned it to the political. uh, as if explaining the turnover to everyone, how normal our claims, we all know the map of the novorossiysk province. in the fourteenth year, thousands of times and published in every way different colors, as for nikolaev, second in the negotiations, so that no one would have illusions very easily. and politically correct. talk about readiness for negotiations, when it is known, you know? this is very correct. this is a good pressure tool. he perfectly understands that kiev will even disobey washington but will not go to beregovaya, especially in such circumstances. vladimir vladimirovich

usually promise keeps he warned. each next offer of negotiations will be tougher than the first offer of negotiations was. the second proposal for negotiations was out of brackets, crimea donbass dpr lpr. this is a negotiation proposal outside the brackets, crimea, donbass republics , kherson region, zaporozhye, the next proposal, coastal well, it will probably be without kiev, it promised and is doing. eh, i'll be honest about my impressions. i agree this is an informal declaration of war by the west, because here, if you summarize the content e political speech of vladimir vladimirovich under one line. that he declared a confrontation with western hegemony, that's how alexander nikolayevich

is a little bit europe to europe is this confrontation, in fact, with one perfect state? i agree with this. yes. moreover, you will notice that not only ukraine was not enough, although from what i have said just now, it is quite enough. there was still very little fight against neo-nazism. the main pathos of today's speech is the fight against non- colonialism. in this sense, this speech is addressed to the whole world, except for the western one, to the same extent as to us, that is, explaining to us our people against whom we are fighting for nothing, we are fighting for freedom justice against dictate. the same proposal was again broadcast to the entire non-western world, which is our potential ally. in this sense, a very ideological river, of course, to give to the question the

word novorossiya was absolutely correctly noticed. here, there was another term big historical russia more yes historically big historical russia yes. so it means that i interpret the president’s words a little differently. we are looking for elena nikolaeva. but the fact is that until now, russia has never been a colony of the west until the nineties, nor in the 90s, and the president spoke about this, that this is russia’s ability to defend its sovereignty and different in the case difficult conditions at different times in different periods of history. it evoked anger and resentment. west it was him who focused on this several times; he said it in various forms, recalling the colonial non-colonial policy of the western countries and western former empires invasions regarding china e, africa, latin america and other regions. and here the president is very clear. here

he outlined the fact that russia for russia is the main point - this is the preservation of its sovereignty, despite the constant and ever-increasing pressure from western countries, and he also used words. here, a rather large historical russia even used the pro anglo-saxon countries. there was a phrase there. great britain is the core, which is the engine of the collective west this is an important point president also, it seems to me that you have such a slightly insignificant objection, because it seems to me that there is no need here. here, look right here officially, i don’t know such a formal status, like colonies. he said, you understand us as friends, yes, even i was not going to argue, in fact, even in the nineties, russia had a missile nuclear shield. russia had a voice. it is this and the nineties, russia tried from its rather weak positions to resist the advancement of nato to the east. we have

it was in everything else vector zhozevch. no nuclear shield. our nuclear potential did not interfere there. eh, the west is with us somehow. the moment regarding e joining the four regions, because they are joining, er, officially in their e within the borders of the regions. yes, this means that we have to hope that the russian army will be able to hopefully solve rather ambitious military tasks in the near future, this is the capture of the city, zaporozhye, a considerable, not a small city in the zaporozhye region, which is not located now, under our control. this taking forty percent of the donetsk region of the dpr which is currently not under russian control is a very ambitious task. and in order for this accession to take place de facto, a lot more forces of the russian army and actions will be required. in short, look, i can say what

the record will definitely catch on in the first place. this is an economic mention of hiroshimegasaki. how to define money? uh-huh although it was said almost as a joke, but knowing the reaction of the westerners there, of course, they will cling to it because of this moment. e. e, that the word in this speech cannot but rejoice me, is that about what? i have repeatedly said here that these are references to the referendum of the ninety-first year and the wrist will of the citizens of the soviet union, which was violated voluntaristically, respectively, people who do not feel like citizens within the borders of new states. whose rights are being violated. they. naturally have the right to protect them to go where their right will be protected. here it is actually. this right is the main thing, which generally is joining donetsk luhansk kherson, zaporozhye and also as you say in the future, perhaps new territories. there is a very simple question here. we continue the operation, if the ukrainian authorities restore the russian language in the city of nikolaev, rights will not be violated there as the state language.