why are we going to sit like this, right? we will not help sana at all. why don't we sit. but for now, yes, you have to wait. what has gribanov already said? let not the fund collect evidence, let's see what he presents is nonsense. somebody needs to sort things out on their own. it won't do anything to itself. he yes for nothing. for others, it might do something .

hello. hello, you are alexander mikhailovich balabin, courier delivery must go through thank you for a second. this is for you. who else did they bring? balabino alexander mikhailovich sign here for receipt. thank you. all the best.

congratulations on your well-deserved rest. wait for new surprises greetings to relatives and friends. i did not understand. what does it mean? i get it, sorry dude. who else is there? your father, i will answer. yes, i’m listening to masha and

vovka have to leave, i won’t explain krasnodar to my mother yet, but believe me, as it should. and you yourself understand no objections, i didn’t come up with it out of the blue. krasnodar tomorrow in the morning i will now buy tickets on the internet crazy why on earth my father asked me so did not explain anything, he is serious trouble. well, only for a week and a half, no more.

we agreed that if the situation changes, i will let you know. well, dad, as i said, you are returning to your missus. once you have reconciled. i'm here without you, i can manage, i need topics and sorrows, my woman will wait. and i have one son and he is dear to me. believe me, i would cry now, but i don’t know how. so go ahead, pack your suitcase. i saw the train in an hour to the waste we'll have time. well, maybe it will quietly eliminate your balabino no.

he needs to be helped. for him dismissal from the police, like a knife through the city this is an evil brother and not an evil life. in principle, i even like our complex plan, a good warm-up before big things. the main thing is to go free. where are we going? you don't have to get used to it. this program is

true, good evening, president zelensky is already openly calling on the western part of a nuclear war against russia, let's listen to the reaction of our world. zelensky called on his western masters to inflict a preemptive nuclear strike on russia, thereby this figure, in fact, presented to the whole world another evidence of those threats that come from the kiev regime and to neutralize, which was launched by a special military operation in the annexed territories, when we will already begin to protect our new citizens in an official way. this is what we will talk about today in detail. in fact, we have already

come to the point where zelensky is simply openly calling for preventive nuclear strikes on the russian federation, and at the same time, how interesting, it means that at the beginning he makes these heroic statements. have you seen it all, then his press secretary appears, who tries to deceive the whole world and say no. you misunderstood him, he's not talking about that at all. he talked about the weather in general. let's listen to zelensky's statement and try to understand whether pre-emptive strikes are needed for him or not for this, so that they know what awaits them if they use nuclear weapons, not vice versa, wait for russia's nuclear strikes to say later. oh you so then get this. in my opinion, everything is very clear, yes, and to what am i talking, this is the second insolence happiness is 100% it’s about these guys that nikiforov, his press secretary, appears again,

who says, yes, you didn’t understand, he’s not pro-nuclear strikes at all, but he’s generally about sanctions. i had a relationship with all of this. by that very twenty-fourth of february, i’m not doing it, and here are sanctions, when in fact his boss directly says that a preemptive strike needs to be carried out, there is our reaction, which means peskov vladimir vladimirovich made a statement that, but these words of zelensky are direct, call to beginning of the third world war. there is also zakharova's reaction. let's see, show us zakharova's statement, here you are, the west is fomenting a nuclear war. every person on the planet must be aware that the puppet and unbalanced character of zelinsky, pumped up with weapons, has turned into a monster with his hands, which can be destroyed, but the planet. mm, and there was also an absolutely wonderful statement by dmitry anatolyevich medvedev; we have it, too, it is wonderful. yes, polite psychiatrists

should give this idiot a preventive craniotomy, until he did even more trouble for his people and everyone else. i have a question, vladimir vladimirovich a. you know what goals mr. zelensky is pursuing, it's all simple. that's how his initiative, or, or it's some kind of multi-move, you know. e. i think now if you ask him, he himself will not tell. after all, in fact, nikiforov for sure, uh, consulted zelensky about what to explain to the public. hey, i looked at this snippet. he really is. eh, i read it on paper. everything seems to be complicated, but ok, when he started answering questions and the hall at this virtual conference in australia, he said, there it is right that the sugar has suffered. yes, at one time he said that a statement for zelensky depends on what state of aggregation he is in at this particular moment, apparently, uh, he was not in the most successful for himself, though and the explanation is not kiforov. you know, it confirms that

this condition is contagious, because, well, excuse me when a person says that only a fragment was shown, and he repeated it there again. yes, what's the point goes? in an intimate nuclear strike on russia insolence is the second happiness, then he goes out and says. no, what do you think? is it blue? no, it's yellow, you understand, and after all, this is the second time this week that he sets up his western masters. first, they played this pantomime coward experienced dunce. yes, when they signed an application for accelerated entry on the street. yes, which is in itself an act of inviting all these nato countries to a global nuclear war. yes? now let's bomb russia with atomic bombs sat up. what what really wait? yes? and of course, this is what i'm looking at. uh, it has already caused some nervous reaction in the west, there have already been notes from the staff there that zelensky is in fact not quite an adequate person. a. well, here is the

statement about a preventive nuclear strike. i don't know if i've been flipping through the western press today as usual, they are alive commenting on something like this now while i'm watching some kind of confusion. a pause, but i think that tomorrow or the day after tomorrow it will also appear in an article in the spirit of who we bet on and with who to work there. you think, i think, because in fact, such statements that zelen makes no, well, they appear after that. that's why you think so to vladimir, because after his application for accelerated entry into nato, such articles appeared again, i say, that is, it caused confusion. this caused surprise, for some this caused irritation, followed by comments that from a number of states. well, the most basic ones, i’m not talking about poland now, like, yes, who , uh, happily supported followed by declaring germans from americans from greasy albert from great britain that we do not consider. now they believe it. and this? well, what about this? well, i see that you believed, of course, they can be

trusted. they don't consider eleven out of thirty states for a second to date. he even named them at the entrance of ukraine, yes, three baltic poles and the largest canada, that's fine. yes, yes, another 12 15 and 18. how do you even, in principle, have confidence that they really, but really no, they don’t want to. they are not ready, unlike many of mine colleagues who, including in this studio, have been convincing for years that nato membership shines for ukraine, i stood here and told you last year and the year before that, of course, they think, of course, they want, of course, this is a threat cannot be discounted. actually, because of this, we have a special operation. yes, including after zelensky’s statement that ukraine needs to withdraw from the budapest weapons and return nuclear weapons, and these words confirm him, but now, of course,

when it is said that let’s give ukraine, uh, we accept nato and automatically nato starts a nuclear war with the russian federation of course. now it's for them, but it seems to me, i understood, but it seems to me, here let's well, i don't know, i just see with you, i'm discussing. yes, maybe you are right, and if you are right, thank god. honestly . i'm just talking. as you can see , the nato press service comes out and makes a statement to the whole world at 19:00 moscow time. wait for stoltenberg's unprecedented statement . you and i were here, in fact, in this studio at that moment, and remember there was such a some kind of us, that after all, now the word was heard from the office of the president of ukraine. and the nato press service said that it was extraordinary. well, or extraordinarily good about blackmailing. we think so.

it is interesting that we, not only we, the whole world thought, what is it to make a statement, mr. stoltenberg, then mr. stoltenberg comes out and the gentleman will obviously do exactly the same thing, that he repeats exactly the same thing that he tells us 28,000 times. but doesn’t it really seem to you that maybe they are trying to lull vigilance on in fact, ours in order to finally get into this conflict on the side of something, but at the same time they keep in mind a fallback option that there will be no nuclear confrontation with russia roman, you know, uh. so i paid attention to the application, how someone flashed so briefly with us. uh, in russia they did not pay much attention to the statement of the british minister of defense wallace. yes, and about when they began to talk to him about the fifth article, he said about poland, listen, of course, the fifth article nato means. yes, uh, team support for defense and stuff, if they attack more, then we

definitely will. it means to protect, but it does not imply a military response, that is, the fifth article does not mean that we are certain. let's take everything like this and start to fight with those who attacked the path. yes, that is yes, yes, i’m talking more, not about ukraine, even about ukraine, we have repeatedly heard such answers, that is, uh. yes , you can indeed wait for the application. but yes, it is you who now want me to apply. i just see that us nuclear weapons may be re-sold as the risk of nuclear war increases. doo-doo-yes. he says give it a long time. yes , the poles for a long time. not only that, i want to say. you know who remembers who last year said that we might put nuclear weapons on the territory of poland stoltenberg, secretary general, and well, and after that it's all on

him. well, how is it, and here is the treaty there, russia nato is still valid then, right? well, it’s understandable that they straightened him up, that’s the point. that's why i wanted to, so to speak, stoltenberg's statement. it quite a political statement. it does not mean that they will fly tomorrow. shells are not stoltenberg, and we know this very well. that is, if there is such a statement that biden will now make an unprecedented statement, or there is someone else in the white house. it is necessary to wait for such decisions stoltenberg, of course, does not take well. sergei borisovich poles are your favorite. that is, it turns out, look , it turns out that zelensky well, there he is in some kind of inadequate state, as vladimir said vladimirovich yes, well, maybe the person made me the mood, that means one statement. duda says, give nuclear weapons himself, so he tells us, that's actually. that's what they say, yes, what are they, that all in unison begin to stay hmm in some kind of abnormal state. or

quietly, really going crazy, what's going on. uh, leadership position. poland is nothing yesterday. and even before the start of the special operation, it was such that they welcome the presence. uh, but new military bases, including with it’s not like it was connected with a special military operation - this is a doctrine. it can be said that the doctrine, although not framed, by some kind of appropriate document, approved and signed, but this has been publicly stated many times in this sense, there is nothing new here, but nato still adheres to and once again confirmed literally. today i confirmed that there are no plans to deploy nuclear weapons. e in the states that joined the nato bloc in the 21st century it is still not assumed, but we do not know how long this position will remain. e. it’s becoming more and more difficult for me, as a peacemaker and a christian pacifist, to preserve, uh,

the principles of my faith. yes, you know, uh, i was educated back in the soviet era and in the soviet era, so to speak, i learned a lot of things and i lived in confidence that there is an armed forces in russia. capable of waging a conventional war with the nato bloc, you understand, and i just wanted to, god forbid, uh, these two terrible forces, mighty, approximately equal, did not collide. yes, and now i'm in some bewilderment and horror. eh, because i i see that in russia there are no armed forces capable of waging a conventional war with the bloc. nato simply does not have them. u if i am mistaken because of my, uh, incompetence in military matters. correct me, but i don’t see any signs of the presence of such russian armed forces, and therefore this, as it were, is a serious blow to my faith, maybe i need to reconsider my christian views, maybe

somehow i need to do other things about this too let's talk sergey borevich. and i just want to understand, but you continue to stay to be in a state of anxiety, because the last time they ruined my mood and say that he was anxious, a week has passed. all the anxiety, the anxiety doesn't go away. uh, really, here's something else that's interesting happened after all these discussions about nuclear weapons. e in the united states of america in the same place, er, no, e of the central committee of the democratic party, which is being held captive there. yes, over there, er, over there, it's different. there's going to be the main sponsors. there is a pool of main sponsors democratic party. there is a pool of main sponsors of the republican party. and the collection of this collection of this bula is a kind of plenum of the central committee of the cpsu yes, there are republicans. what do you think of the democratic party? and he talked. he is closed

. he never, so to speak, covers so much protocol filming, but then there are leaks, and then , uh, uh, the plenum of the main sponsors of the democratic ruling democratic party took place. and judging by the leaks, uh, that means, uh, they reprimanded , put on the look of the bideno, that uh, we, as it were, would give the go-ahead. uh, it means we help ukraine the goodness was given to bring it to some kind of there, it doesn’t mean, but uh, no one gave it to you. kindness, so that you put on the brink of the third world war, kindness was not given for this. the more interesting the war is also documents, but great. here's the problem. i liked the leak, i liked it. there is a man who just recently worked as the chief of the cia. i think that this man probably has some kind of access to certain members of the american politburo. yes? correct is correct, nevertheless, nevertheless the price of his

memoirs is not, e he stuffs the price of his difference. well sergey borisovich is doing there, the man headed the ceira, he has connections. he has exactly the same channels through which he receives information, including the same leak, nevertheless he does not flinch for a second to make a statement. let's listen. nato will destroy all conventional russian weapons that we can see identified on the battlefield in ukraine as well as in the crimea and all ships of the black sea fleet. here you are, please. of course, i can assume anything. sergey boy knocks down his price there or else something to do, nevertheless quite a serious figure. this is not some freak, this is a rather serious person. he openly says that we will do this and that, while again this is a strange story, when they are always trying to

limit themselves to the region of crimea and the black sea. and they, probably, that’s why i’m telling you, vladimir vladimirovich, maybe they still assume that they can do something in the region of the crimea and the black sea, while the russians don’t have enough determination to press everything there buttons, and which largely undermining the northern streams. this is also such a test. yes, we have pressed buttons, which do not yet have a speedometer, what do you think? yes, everyone has gone crazy, or is it such a political preparation, you know. yes, i still want, uh, to respond to the first part, because i think this is very important, and i spoke about sanctions, it’s impossible to deceive sign language or about a preventive nuclear strike, no one is sanctions. you don’t understand like this, yes, no one says like this, so it’s clear that it was a preemptive strike, but i need it like that, i i think i have my own point of view. this is all a little, knowing the ukrainian policy of ukrainian politicians and zelensky uh-huh, i can assume

that this is a kind of defensive reaction of zelensky, you know, he, he, he is a reaction. he is constantly trying to shift the blame off himself and shift the responsibility onto the western partners. these are not words. eh, the warrior of the winner who is confident in his victory is a man. which is not sure of victory and all the time says, give it to us. you remember these groans of zelensky give us weapons, we are not enough weapons. give us weapons. we don't have weapons. we do not have enough weapons to defeat the russians, then he said uh there, i beg your pardon. let's hear. yes we need to literally now, and leave for a minute and in a minute you will return to this studio and continue our very interesting conversation with our guests about what is happening on the field now in the newspapers they will write only tomorrow the debriefing will be tomorrow the conversations at the cooler about the match all tomorrow , but

win. you can right now on the site and in the application 1xbet, play. now the rest tomorrow 12 days. she hid him from the punishers. zelensky help please. i was let down by each of my deaths and our tanker, zhenya, who also died, was killed, yes, how she risks herself, hid him from the nazis, nursed and prayed for our guy. this is what is written here. there you are so cursed by aunts of light who defeated zelensky and found a son. on sunday at 6:00 pm on ntv this program is true, we continue to talk with

our guests, and the situation in ukraine continues. i will continue. this is a defensive reaction of zelensky, he constantly says that he does not he has enough weapons to defeat the russians, he demands, or rather, as he puts it, a request for ukraine to be accepted into nato in an accelerated mode, so further apply preventive energy, too. look at the picture inside the country zelensky shows to his voters that he wants to achieve victory, but there are partners in the west who are not enough, and they help him, they don’t want to put him under the nato umbrella, you don’t want to launch a preemptive strike, and thus they don’t want to help ukraine win russia, he actually behaves like a skunk. satanist. that's all he has in his arsenal. he is trying to protect himself. see. what a story. it turned out after he announced this preemptive strike, the rating collapsed; his

rating collapsed by 10 points. this is a leak directly to the coupe, they themselves write about it. yes of course, why a professional? of course, i beg your pardon, but in a dictatorship. what kind of rating do you talk about in ukraine, who is interested in the chirians in ukraine, when zelensky has none opponent. well, what rating are you talking about, you say that you are trying just like that, somehow yes. why is he trying then? what is the deal? this is where i see the danger for zelensky. here he will inevitably have a conflict, first of all with the europeans, then with the americans, because in fact he is like an actor, he considers himself a very great world-class politician, and western partners themselves. yes, he reads the price of his little faceless dwarf political little political faceless dwarfs, and he is all the time. he wants to save face with his statements, and western

partners, they keep saying you don't have any face, boy. you are what you claim. you should first consult with us, consult, and then make a statement, because in fact i am convinced that this circus with horses, when the three of them signed, the petition, and joining nato it was zelensky’s improvisation, i am convinced of this , but he just embarrassed the western partners, they once again had to say, but we can’t take you into this in parts, yes, and so on. and zelensky, of course, received from this dividends. but i think he called very seriously. who is in charge of whom? explain to me, he said, who really leads whom there, because everyone says , yes, and we all said for many years that he is a puppet there, he does everything you want to do. for example, i think that there are two political groups in the group in ukraine that are working. different countries one political group that works with the americans and another political group

that works with the british zelensky works with the british. uh-huh, there's another group that working with americans. yes for false and his team. that is, this is also a kind of internal competition, and they, of course, uh, certainly have some kind of narrow corridor of opportunities for improvisation, but here you can know how to turn the stick, but in fact there is really nothing behind zelensky no. well, listen, there is no ukraine, there is no economy . you just, well, it doesn't exist. no, yes, it's very important. why did i explain to you that if ukraine requests 38 billion for the next year, external support is, generally speaking, an annual the budget of ukraine that is, this is what the statement is about that we do not have a penny of money, so wait, well, you know how the dad was in ukraine. let's get louder, i'm just running the cossacks. yes, well, where, if you are at the chieftain of the gold reserve? no, they will give him this money, this is not the

first country that had to be thrown to the americans. well, not the first, not the last, those who served the interests of the americans. yes, there have been many times in history when they are faithful, however, they were served. yes, and then came the moment of crisis. they ran to the embassy and said. hear protect me if she is in my family yes. yes, yes, well, the stakes in the game are the other stakes in the game until then we remain the only rulers on this planet , we understand how much it will take so much we will give, if they were, these peppers are going to, if they are sure that the financing of the ukraine project is anti-russia, expedient, but there may come a point when it starts to work in the opposite direction. do you understand what expediency is? yes, this is when one or another

side, which, as they say, the americans, we invested 66 billion dollars in ukraine, that is, in this project, the americans are right. i want to tell you, they invested 66 billion. they got a lot. more. they received practically single-handedly the entire energy market of europe, which, at a gas price of $300, was estimated at $ 400 billion. now, of course, it is much higher. i only ask the americans a question, it is not clear what they invested, what they received not with the europeans. it's not clear don't worry, let them think for themselves, yes, that's all, that's all, but i'm still against it, that's what's left for anyone to think. i keep coming back to nuclear weapons with advanced para-rafael. yes, this story haunts me. and i don't trust these people. i don't believe in their statement that, and we do n't even think about it, but why do we need it, why because well, besides the fact that they already and pepper it we understand everything, besides this. this is what is happening in

their information space, their information space. i see that i see publications, for example, about a loved one, and by sergey borisovich poseidon yes, i see this publication. let's show it here, show it, but not found so far we will show. yes, they talk, they talk. what damage can be done by tests of russian weapons, poseidon is there. yes, if we apply and a nuclear tsunami will cause an impact. everything , everything, i am a reader. here's just an ordinary person sitting there somewhere in some bratislava there, or somewhere in new york. no matter where there, well, by chance. so i take and read, yes, and i see, yeah, here it is, for example, new york, new york can destroy. maybe it's nonsense? let's go further. times putin ordered to send. but there is also see putin ordered to send a nuclear train to the front line, but in ukraine there is a nuclear belt -

as i understand it, this is what the bzhrka means. yes, we do have. but that's okay, we were going to make another barguzin instead of a bzhrk, in my opinion, so far it hasn't been done well, it doesn't stop anyone from writing that any person who sits in prague and bratislava and in some kind of leipzigelmets yes, and sent to ukraine, it means that the nuclear belt is further divisible; russia has six thousand nuclear weapons. and this is the most a large supply, and in the world hmm further ukraine is preparing evacuation centers in kiev because of a possible nuclear strike. or maybe it seems to me, but you know what all this is for. looks like it's like preparing your own population, well, honestly . well, because otherwise, why write all this. rafael, i'm wrong. tell me, unfortunately, you are not mistaken. i would like to start by saying that this rhetoric about a nuclear strike. uh

limited preemptive strike. it arose against the backdrop of our failures. at the front. this appeared just then. this is now appearing and now being exaggerated by the entire anglo-saxon press, here, which i look at, i still have the feeling that we are gradually being accustomed to war. here is the term war. it didn't intimidate us. now we are being introduced at the same time that war is normal, it will be like that. we have a foothold. here we have everything ukraine, we can fight here, and this is being said now against the background of the fact that, well, in fact, according to the principle for animals. who is planning to do it and just i think that all these statements are now addressed to russia . they are just creating, and here are the statements of an unexpected treusa to show us what is happening now. processes when the information space has already broken our consciousness and millions of millions of people around the world people have ceased to be afraid of war, as such it is considered the norm. we are told that the history of this history of wars of wars come in very

beautifully. there is a name. here they are exaggerating. this is a war of scarlet and red roses. this is a war for the beautiful elena , we perceive the war as part of our life already and i don't know, maybe this is correct to some extent, but nevertheless. now it is being introduced and our civilization is now becoming this history of the warrior has been erased already peaceful period. periods. some historians. here, perhaps, wars are known. they say that, uh, we didn’t have time as such even now, if the question arises, of course. and why, let's say? is it being implemented right now? why this is happening now, because the situation that is developing within western society now. that, what is happening now in england in america, those screaming contradictions that are inside america , look what is happening now. look at the crime rate. now look at what level of confrontation and racial ethnic religious all this is being solved and washed away by the war

. they are unable to resolve peacefully . this will be a war. and they want to get into the consciousness of humanity. the beginning of this war was associated with us. and they flip. this too. if i just want to know what is the matter here, the horror is not that this is already happening in the fact that we really are this caricature, not history, not the history of civilization, but the history of wars is a caricature. it has now infiltrated with consciousness in our military consciousness. we have a cartoon of politicians. we have cartoon countries. we have a caricature foreign policy, caricature leaders. look around you, what is happening around the world, with this help, with the help of war, the threats of war are turned into a caricature. and so i say that now in ukraine what is happening, i would like our political leadership to simply realize that we are fighting there, even and not even with the americans, my opinion is that ukraine is already a de facto member of nato, what is being done? everything is absolutely being done, based on this concept that the secretary of defense was saying, let's say, uh, the uk please support the full budget

is provided by armaments. everything is. they are already there , all this is happening already in place. that's it, you see, it really decides, but this is the phrase yes, putin said it, in my opinion, in st. petersburg at the economic forum, the military development of the territory. well listen for years. they are doing this, and we saw it and we knew it, but now look at sergey, and it really feels like the process of demonizing russia is ending in terms of information, that is, they have already explained it there, but to the last one, as they say to the person who is there somewhere - then he sits there with a mug of beer, yes, that russia is simple. horror and everything connected with russia urgently need to get rid of this, right? yes they finished and start the next process. they begin to prepare their own people precisely for this horror of a nuclear strike or an exchange of nuclear strikes, and

at the same time, under what sauce does all this serve that it is we who are preparing to deliver this nuclear strike. and they are forced to just defend themselves, but in their heads, maybe somewhere they keep something that they probably won’t dare not dare the russians, probably there, because we know them, they are kind, what do you think, you know this the number of statements at the media level and at the level politicians in which the keywords appear russia ukraine nuclear weapons, of course. yes of course, of course it is. eh, it’s just going through the roof and the most difficult question arises, what is next for what everyone is preparing for, those present here understand that they are preparing for something. let's try to decipher this situation, apparently preparing for a. the situation where at some point, uh, it will be possible to say that russia has used tactical nuclear weapons against ukraine. is russia making it clear that we are

not going to do this? well, of course, our the statement is reversed. they turn over then arises. listen biden. now the bidens are talking. here i am reacting there to putin's statement about the tactical one. i took it, look, but no one is interested in it. i am now here i have discussed this with many military experts. it is in the air, but i will try now, perhaps, to formulate it for the first time. here. yes, look at what scenario is possible here, and we understand that there is a colossal media demand for the history of russia, which is the instigator of nuclear war on ukraine but russia is not conducted. she understand this, russia does not respond to this provocation, then you can. it's all about directing. how can you look, for example, and from the territory of one of the nato bases in europe to deliver

a small nuclear warhead to the territory of ukraine, yes. yes, it's quiet. yes, that means, and then put it into action, when he said, you see, lech, here it is, finally, zelensky warned the biden, warned anyone of doubt that the current ukrainian leadership. might not do it. see. you can object to me, you can object to me that this is a crazy plan and it is reasonable to say that warheads. sorry, this is not a box, a tomato in a warehouse, they are all registered to be expensive, and not the proliferation of nuclear weapons, which strictly forbids such things to be eaten, but a strict control system. yes, you can’t hide shila in a bag, and finally, if this happens, god forbid, then we will be able to do it even by the nature of the explosion. explain the nature of it, where it was produced and how we would seem to be able to do it, but with on the other hand, taking into account the fact that there are no rules at all. no, we are still living by

inertia, imagine it should not be, because there is an agreement that it should not be like this, that everything is very strictly controlled. yes, so to speak, that's what then we can still explain that this is a provocation. look at the nature of the explosion, and so on and so forth. but no one will delve into these details anymore, you understand, just like right now with this same gas pipeline, the same thing, that is, just a nuclear bull. you see, don't let god will say that you yourself did it in order to make the mood request, but for a nuclear barrel, then, this is the same situation. she, well, repeats, you know, and with all the madness, the madness of this scenario. you know, i am not a supporter of conspiracy theories. i have always despised them. i see how conspiracy theories are coming into our lives becoming a reality. yes , because in bucha there was a conspiracy theory with northern streams, it was also a crazy thing. and now, if today there are no rules, then i do not

exclude that they will not really deliver it, nor blow it up, and then they won't tell. you see, finally. we are zelensky, and zelensky warned with the last of his strength, do something with this russia and that's it. you know, they also talked about it, but you didn't believe us. and so you see, but there is one thing, but it is not difficult to do it, practically it is not even difficult to implement it, but this has its consequences. you can convince yourself as much as you like that russians will not be understood. who did this? what if tomorrow the russians start doing the same all over the world. and what next will you think they they are actually americans, but not idiots, they understand how it all can end, then whatever, but not only, but there is such a thing to see. the expression they are americans far away yes at the same time, look now for a second sergey give me 30 seconds, if you can. no, fine. yes, you

continue literally after the ad. i'm just talking about what you were talking about, look here or this option, you don't even need to import anything. here 's an option. look, at least four or five groups of 100 to 110 people have passed training directly in britain from british military instructors in order to seize a nuclear power plant, the risk is present to us these plans are a well-known statement. rogov does not need to lead anything. here it is zaporizhzhya station, you need to throw the drg there, start hostilities during the retreat or at it doesn’t matter, or blow it up. here you are , and he will say that the russians who are standing at the zaporozhye station are to blame for everything, you will now interrupt, return to this studio in just a minute and continue our conversation with our guests and you will finish sergei yes, we'll be back in a minute. the crime elevated in ukraine to the rank of national policy, i should consult with

the help of the telephone attacking the inhabitants of russia , the information war against russia is overseen by the top criminals of the ukrainian and ukrainian authorities, without this merger it is impossible to work as a call center blackmail direct threats 150 and one method of telephone terrorism. fraudsters. for three months. you are a billion rubles. our citizens. who merges bank bases with operit, where is the largest 20 on tv this program is true we continue to talk with our guests the situation in ukraine sergey we listen to you again i am deeply convinced that the

russian leadership will never take such an adventure as the use of tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine but if you stage this story and give it the appearance of authenticity , then sergey borisovich will turn away from us all china india brazil we will all be strategic autonomy alone. you see, we will become an outcast, and they want to achieve exactly this. they want us get rid of the alternative path, which we successfully implemented after the start of special operations. this is what this colossal informational defeat is designed for, taking into account the fact that we lost the information war, and we do not know how to fight, because we are too honest to understand. yes, we do not know how to fight. that's when it will be very difficult for us. this is the only one. this is a huge reason. yes, with whom will we stay, with whom will we trade, with whom will we conduct investment cooperation, if everyone thinks that i am there and did at least this. do you think this is a small price ?

you completely understand what i'm talking about. uh-huh yes, then your forecast for uh, next year. that's what will happen to what we have so far called uh horizon, sergey now we are renewing, we are not discussing a special military operation. we are now modeling the situation and trying to figure it out. why is the topic heated to the boiling point informational and tactical nuclear weapons. that's all. heated up. after all, the obvious injection is absolutely uh experts, and all the experts who are present in this story, who are not present in this studio that discusses politics is not to add, uh, oil to the car. a balanced attitude to some facts, and the facts one of the facts is the speech of the leaders of other countries who are our rivals there, or enemies after this tirade start i want

to return to the original quote gentleman from zelensky mr. zelensky recommended that the nato countries launch a preemptive strike, or a preventive strike against russia is true, but it’s not true that mr. zelensky suggested that the nato countries launch a preventive nuclear strike, it was about delivering a preventive strike against national weapons in order to stop russia from hunting. e, respectively e, attack first with e using tactical weapons. this is the first second e yes. i really don't think it's very right that the transmission of one's guard is constantly shown quotes to the viewers too. seen with your own eyes and the second in the last one about acetate was very interesting, a quote from petterus, who said that, that, that russia, that nato countries can either be

ready to destroy the fleet. uh, respectively, uh, the black sea and destroy all military forces on the territory of ukraine, but this was the second part of the quote, and the first part of the quote in this interview, unfortunately, was obviously not shown to petros in no less time. by the way, i bring the right one, yes, fedra, and petrius. what to do if russia uses tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine and and this former uh church leader said that nato should not respond with nuclear weapons. nato will respond with conversion weapons, and he said we warned russia about this that if you, uh, use it. i one hit, then we will destroy the conventional weapons. uh, the entire fleet is russian and we will destroy all e russian ones, but i don’t understand, i didn’t understand, he said this, he

answered the question of the contradiction between what they were talking about, we look, no, this story has no end and you will destroy the fleet. and here i go we don’t think about it everything, now, if they ask about it, and we ended up yes, just like this person, that they can destroy some of ours there, and units in the crimea and the black sea, there and more on the territory of ukraine or somewhere else, and this will not lead. yes to nuclear war, once again. yes. okay, from vetom's answer to russia's already use of a tactical nuclear strike. well well, but we will not answer when the fan. you heard my point of view is, yes, and then they said, there russia will use a tactical uncle on weapons not to try on from my point of view, russia has naturally, there is

no desire there for the order. to use toxic uncles on weapons, of course, what i’m just saying, mr. biden, but uh, that means a question that i’ll just insert, if it turns out that with the help of conventional weapons, and the russian armed forces will not be able to, either u achieve, uh, success , with ukraine which nato is helping to arm, and so on, it is clear that they objectively have more potential, that uh, if there is only one alternative left, either uh, lose the constitutional war to ukraine, or there is another nuclear weapon, and there we have the right to use what russia will do and say that under no circumstances will russia use the situation. do you understand it? yes, it will not help, it is rational that russia is ready to accept anything there, in case of emergency. the first

goal is the second, that is, it is not an end in itself, that they definitely use russia in my opinion, and we would all be happy if the war is a war of a special operation, i beg your pardon. that is, i made a reservation to end for for end peacefully agreement with the help of professional weapons. you also don't want to take a weapon, and she said she would use it. i have already repeated. it is in the quote of the former head of the hand how it will react to the use of tactical nuclear weapons. in ukraine, nato will not use nuclear weapons, because they are sponsored, as mr. stankevich said the united states said, we did not sign sponsors. yes, we did not sign up for a world war at all, and no one wants nato to have a world war. simple, yes, now quite possible, but one gets the impression that against the background of the capture of three villages, you think that in fact ukraine is already winning. i just yes, yes, because, well,

you listen like that and you think everything is gone. that is, you have already forgotten the certainty that we can lose ukraine, you have forgotten that the sea of ​​azov has become an inland sea of ​​russia, that crimea has retreated to russia, that just a week ago, the four largest regions were ceded to russia, and you continue to speak. well, what will happen if ukraine wins this war? listen, for me, this question is not worth it at all. i believe that ukraine lost exactly when anti-russia agreed to the implementation of the ukraine project. at that moment, she had already lost. now about the potential of the military and so on. you understand russia until today they are not fighting with their own army or navy. well, this is amazing stuff. i think you have you have the opportunity in the future. write a book how to defeat the nato bloc without using the army fleet. well, it seems to me so, while these are amazing things for me, but the army has not yet fought. you understand what's the matter, and you talk about the topic,

if ukraine's chance for a minute is four legions that became part of russia, this is a mobilization resource of 10 million people 10 million, a person who ukraine does not have. or do you think that in ukraine this e, mobilization resource is endless, therefore, when you talk about the topic? is there a chance to see that there is no chance even with yourself for a hemp, even for a hemp on advice, but you yourself understand the end, it’s not a pity that this is happening in my country, which is headed by absolute the puppets don't understand. what game were they dragged into at all, and how will it all end for the country? what's the trouble here? and one more thing that i drew attention to, maybe not only me, it sounds more and more often, crimea crimea crimea crimea, but look, it means a-la-la pentagon statement for example, if we have a statement from the pentagon and ukraine asks

for missiles, means, uh, with the condition to harmonize with the goal. yes, a rocket needs heights to strike on remote russian air defense logistics lines , ammunition depot bases in eastern southeastern ukraine in in particular in crimea yes, crimea appears in crimea, while about crimea about crimea, we warned everyone a long time ago, a long time ago, from the fourteenth year. they said here, please, assistant minister of defense. uh, usa there is such a position, it turns out that according to our estimates, with the help of which they already have for the hammers. they can hit most targets on the battlefield, including crimea, see and just to be clear, crimea is ukraine a. i mean, it's a license. yes, of course, i even i would even say. well, look, well, just here, yes, but they say, they say they say that dario dugin. they were killed as a result of a terrorist

act, and this decision was made by the authorities of ukraine, they made this statement. right, yes, right , it means that it was an independent decision of the ukrainian ukrainian authorities with us. they did not agree on this, the americans said. now, when they are talking about the crimea and so in detail, painting. what resources does kiev have in order to strike at the crimea; in this way, they not only give them a license for these strikes, they encourage these attacks. although i have been speaking since the fourteenth year. they have already heard everything about the position of russia in the event that something happens with the crimea konstantin how are we and what will happen in this case? here we are now learning how we should respond. if suddenly they do, then what are the americans talking about on their own in practice. here, in fact, they will strike at the crimea. i believe that we must react extremely harshly. clearly and effectively. you see, and

the main goal of this entire western nuclear tantrums. in my opinion is that send russia a simple signal to stop russia. stop running your special military operation. are you really here? that the west will risk everything and start the scenario of a third world nuclear war with russia, this, in fact, will be the last war in the history of mankind. all civilization will be in the stone age. i understand it. well, here's the script, here they did something like that. that's what sergey told us about, or, and some saboteurs took it there, blew up the zaporozhye station, mmm, got almost that the same as if they used tactical weapons, and even worse consequences and they say, and we have nothing to do with it. well, it's not us, you have a showdown with each other. you have a special military operation there in ukraine all claims against

ukraine and ukrainians well done keep it up keep it up. we are still with you, well, firstly , not a fact, turn it on not a fact that this will happen. but the fact that this is what is happening is a policy of bluffing this policy of bluffing from the side of the west and the united states, we have repeatedly forgotten about reagan about the star wars program, soybean strategic defense initiative, in which the soviet union believed, but we believed or wanted to, therefore, we later became so smart after decades, when we realized that, it turns out, this was nothing. and what did they believe then and went and watched all kinds of star wars films, there, and so on and so forth, what is actually happening today in parallel with this escalation process. i now see, in fact, there are already some splits, er, in the american elites. look a week ago trump firstly, he made a statement that he was ready to be a moderator of the negotiation process. after

a few e days, then the brain said that it was also time to start this process, although the mask mask was amazing, of course, last week. especially me know what liked now will continue. yes, just like that, uh, in the beginning, this one here. actually a tweet there, and with offers. yes, and he said almost the same thing, what he just said spiridon pavlovich, igor evgenievich is simply not in the know, and musk wrote that the russian federation has much more mobilization resources and the population there than in ukraine. ukraine has no chance, and therefore i propose, but then when it was bitter, that's it. well, what started there? yes, you remember what started, yes, they crushed this very mask, he is like that. no-no-no, i support our ukraine. so, support for ukraine is worth it. there are so many billions there. yes, russian support costs 0 rubles 0 kopecks. 0 cents 0.2 dollars, and then once again i'm a surprise

and look at the results of the vote. here they are these regions, then, and ukraine that voted for the party of regions, which seem to be about russia, and you see that these are all there. yes , blue says. he this is all that voted for the russian federation what happens to the mask i don’t know, but the biggest question is what will happen to him next yes and after the mask , it should even be before the cia who declared that ukraine is not sleepy synchronizes its activities with us. that is, in fact, some kind of fatigue from ukraine is already beginning, so i don’t want to. by the way, i can't hear it. i’m tired of ukraine here, i don’t believe in any direction, even biden is in a strategic dead end, because on the one hand he wants to be in a strategic dead end of all ages there, except for biden. there are also other people. well, look, well, he exists there, because

on the one hand he wants to inflict a strategic defeat on russia, and on the other hand. it is clear that ukraine has a lot of food, but there is still not enough money and weapons. yes, but he is forced to pump ukraine with weapons. and this there will be a pumping of weapons, huh? continue until they have conviction, victory over russia is possible, so in order for this conviction not to exist, it is necessary not to verbally declare the red lines that they have already crossed all 10 times remember, we said zhiviliny krasnoyar, i understood the idea. i understand you decipher not in words. yeah , for now, how does he react later, ah. now it is already being discussed with delivery at 16. how is it not in words. and how should it be an example? well, for example, a. well start hitting the so-called centers making a decision in kiev yes, in order to at least stop these excursions of western politicians who come there from poland from the baltic states, i

’m glad that even this week, at last, in six months we used the e tu-22, and our strategic bombers, and then russia does not use even 15% of everything, but my potential got out like that, in connection with this there is a big question. i ca n't understand why? we do not use this potential and spiridon pavlovich and you are already like-minded peacekeepers and pacifists. they occupy key posts six months six months. i'm talking about the fact that the guys from the armed forces of the russian federation are not participating in a special military operation. well, because you enter yandex , you drive in the number of the armed forces of the russian federation, more than two million 2.200, but, it says there, there are 250 million military personnel, well 1.250. of this 250 million, we conducted a special military operation with a grouping of 150,000 people. yes

, we had how many from 150 to 200 contract soldiers well? why don't we use armed forces of the russian federation but at the same time we announce mobilization? here's something that doesn't work for me. you have an answer to this question. let's not now. if there is, think, yes, we'll be back in a minute and immediately answer. yes, i want to understand what is happening, just in a minute we will return to the studio. do not miss the events and people of the week on central television elon musk decided to become a peacemaker, what was it? really with the help of an eccentric billionaire. the west launched a trial balloon to test possible ground for negotiations and how to be with the fact that zelensky, having signed a document refusing all negotiations with moscow, essentially cut off all paths to peace emmanuel macron, has already changed his shirt to a warm turtleneck europe is switching to a winter dress code and energy

sobriety. but why, at the same time, no one even tries to investigate the sabotage of the century on the baltic gas pipelines, nothing has been forgotten anymore, demanding reparations from germany following the results of world war ii. is warsaw really opening a pandura box that could lead to a new redistribution of europe's borders? will be your central television tomorrow at 19:00 on ntv this program is our own truth, we continue to talk with our guests about the situation in ukraine . why? let's answer , the question really arises not only why do our armed forces remain somewhere in transbaikalia in the far east in murmansk base in gyumri tajikistan and the state calls for a russian peasant, who is this russian peasant? this is a worker, this is a farmer, this is a teacher who has served, maybe even has

combat experience, but he did it 10 years ago, and he actually already in civilian life. reached some heights. and most importantly, he is an economic unit, that is, we draw this farmer. here is an example of a worker from the national economy. and he goes to defend the motherland honestly sincerely, honor and praise are not hidden anywhere , at the same time people who, by their professional choice, by their vocation, should be engaged in the defense of the motherland who know yut who are in a situation of coordinating yes, the so-called, who understand the vertical hierarchy officer private and in fact, he is constantly on the shooting ranges in good physical shape. they remain somewhere

to guard the distant borders of the motherland. here it is asked for 2 months. a farmer who, uh, was engaged in animal husbandry. and he actually watched football and was not going to prepare better than these people who constantly find it. actually, in combat readiness, the question arises for us that our armed forces or the ministry of defense is some kind of corporation that protects its own, as you know, now some firms demand all the preferences there it firms, there travel companies. yes, but we already have tourists. yes, it has become, but the self-forming question is the generating system, and this is not all, or something tells me that the list will increase, the russian peasant is ready to go to defend his homeland, but the military personnel are security forces. you know, i once rode, uh,

in a taxi and listened to such a humorous program on the radio and they said security guard's day congratulations to our 2 million employees of private security companies. yes, yes, that the employees of the probe, that they are now storming, the upper lars men are all fathers already. yes, there is some the number of pensioners, but in general. we know in schools. they generally sit in their lives, and so on the question arises. why is this happening? after all, it affects the national economic economy, takes out economic ones, i don’t know, i don’t really have an answer , and i reasoned like this. i'm talking. when i tried to understand, it means, and here i was reasoning like this. 1.200.000 is an army. well, you named our bases there. that's all, yes, but you can't bare. as they say, all other directions. this is also understandable, but it does not mean that we have no armed forces except those that are

employed in other directions. they have this people under oath already. yes, these are people armed with an oath, who do not need to explain anything. this is what you were talking about, in addition to this, here i am again trying to argue that there are military schools, a huge number of military schools. these are cadets for a second. these are people who are going to connect their lives with the armed forces. they are all under oath. they are already practically starting from the third year. yearly in many places, apparently it does not matter. they start from the third year already almost ready, junior commanders. is not it so. we are told that we need junior commanders just during the war. and remember, yes, 3 months 3 months as a junior lieutenant and forward. as they say, the team is already a platoon there or a gun and everything else, but they don’t tell us anything about the military school, and the conscripts tell us not to touch the conscripts. i understand everything where this story came from - do not touch the

conscripts. this is a popular story. it's clear, yes echo but, ah, but i was also a conscript, and in my pavlovich was a conscript, our generation fought in afghanistan for a second. yes, we were conscripts. simply, if you are a conscript, well, you are already you are already a military man. and if it happens in the country, that's what happens. well, if we do not use, in fact, our personnel. right now, then why, in principle, we need these advantages, i can’t. here are some of these things, right? now i understand the logic, i understand that you can’t touch it, the sailors, for example, are there from the ships there from underwater oh well, we don’t touch the crew of the strategic missile forces , let’s say you can’t take everyone. there it is, well, we have others. but here we are, somehow, yes, i don’t know, i want to finish, and at the same time, we still don’t need to cancel mobilization. perhaps more

waves of mobilization are needed. we see in this an objective necessity our president spoke about it in his speech and in the st. george hall, but those people about whom we spoke, here, they are already well-coordinated ready. in fact, they should be in the zone of their own, and those who were mobilized. let's send to defend distant borders of the motherland in murmansk to the far east and so on, as an option, when we say, as an option, uh, law enforcement officers, of whom we have a million, who are also constantly on alert. well, let's remember the soviet experience, vigilantes cannot replace them, why not? i already told us on mosfilmovskaya street. the traffic police stop me and the traffic police is standing here the crew is standing exactly across the road a little bit second. this is where the third one stands to the left and captain captain comes up. and he says, now he will drive up, the fourth on

my question. listen, what's going on? why is it that some of our bosses live on one patch of four crews, and here some street racers told us to deal with them. and these are also people liable for military service - these are officers, these are officers, and who, probably, shoot better than the person who is there from a civilian. just pulled it up yesterday. that's right. yes, probably, there are questions, there are questions, as an option. why not send them there so that this is the most basic problem, the most painful topic is, of course, conscripts are those who serve in military service, but i also want to note one point here, for a year, while he serves in the army, which does not fight well. yes, everything is fine, but a year later he is fired from this army, and he automatically falls under mobilization, so those who think that today we need to make sure that the army does not fight, that my son does not go to war. well, of course, well, the meaning loses its meaning, just not only, no, this will inevitably lead to this, how moreover

, this person will end up in the wrong military unit served. everyone knows everyone knows everyone knows, he has a chance that he will survive. 100 times more than if he gets somewhere, it’s not at all clear where, and one more thing you don’t need to think about. for some reason, everyone perceives that you know this, here is the section, go there, it means that everyone on the front line is engaged in assault on the war. look, it's not like that. we don't know newbies yet. there are people there to do this, but they cannot simultaneously keep a thousand kilometers, the border at the same time ensure order in the bodies, and so further and the like, that is, people's perception of war. everyone has their own hence the fears hence the fears. here you can agree with this, you can not agree, but justice. if we are talking about a just society. yes, that hard worker who was standing somewhere at the stove at the plant,

doing something else somewhere, he paid taxes so that the serviceman received a free apartment and received a 50% discount on paying for a communal apartment. received preferences. i want to ask questions. where are the generals now? well, well see. i looked today statistics on the number of generals of the soviet era today. yes, i just don’t even want to voice it all , you understand, but when we have generals with caps that won’t fit through the door all this time, while everything was peaceful. but, probably, they should show themselves during the war. well , it's scary to look where you look, they are the generals of the stripes. well, it must be converted into something. for example, i think that, in principle, when you said about military cadets they taught, if the person i am not right. maybe i don't rights. say what's right. well, it’s just that these are already military people roman if a person has decided for himself to become a military man. only the state is obliged to create conditions and opportunities for self-realization and growth. what

, for example, if he goes to a combat zone , it doesn’t matter if he fights there on the front or provides rear. well, he's officially in a war zone. he was called to be raised once every 4 months. they are once every 4 years, and those who are in the rear, here, let them call for a promotion once every four months and preferences, benefits should be different for people who are fighting on the front lines and who are sitting in the rear. you see, when certain conditions are created and conditions understandable to people. but then you can talk about who wants, who does not want, who, maybe, who cannot, someone will write a report, but it will also be clear. i wrote a post on my telegram channel, a and on the air, he says, moscow. i just, actually, said this. well , look, the situation is also interesting. well, maybe all people are all human yes interesting situation one, honestly went to the army, gave up to the motherland , served, another twisted, all of himself

purely stealing from the factory, turned out to be ill, bought some kind of certificate there or something else, and we know all these ways, and how this is all done gets some then the war ticket, respectively. there is no military service in vus. no, a person who did everything honestly does not get submobilization, he also has a university. and, accordingly, this mowing down again falls under the mobilization. that's what they were called, squinting away from the army, sitting grinning, looking at those who served called them fools who do not understand anything in this life and continues to sit and consider them fools who do not understand anything in this life, and then later the general rector of the university further to other people of the opportunity, because once they are in the same conditions. you are he cannot be by definition. and it definitely needs to be broken. call it whatever you like, but the infringement of

rights, that's for the public who squinted preferences for those who have served this way, you definitely need to go. i insist on this, because otherwise, it's just unfair and our people are about justice. this is a very important story. now vladimir vladimirovich is now rafael, but nonetheless. you understand that this is their activity of these people, i mean in the west, who are all sorts of figures there. this is directly related. actually, with what is happening in the zone, and the military operation is correct, of course, and not only and not only there is a statement by our president. so i want us to listen about the referendum. let's listen to me the results of the referendum, oh who were refused, frankly speaking, i was even somewhat not only pleased or even surprised , nevertheless, in such difficult conditions, people lived, and continue to live, and such a result. trust me. i think that this is what people are seeing, there

was no desire to send something to clean up something or add something. we decided it for ourselves, we decided it would be the way people wanted it to be, if people speak out. that's how people said they would say, that's what we did and here's the result, of course, it's more than convincing and it absolutely uh, absolutely transparent this result and not subject to any doubt. they burned the bus, shot 16 civilians continue to beat these same americans. again, another story. they see it too. yes, here they are transmitting, look, and the title. yes, i have. this is a plaque. show me this frame. here is this horror. yes, the bus with people was burned. and 16 people. they put it right today, that is, yes, that

is, they continue to continue a week ago. we talked to you, remember how they beat, in fact, with grenade launchers and from machine guns absolutely here sergey borisovich you remember, it was sergey borisovich who tried to explain to mike that they beat him, just knowing perfectly well that these were people. and continue to allocate assistance means 625 million for the additional security of ukraine, who spoke about fatigue, there will be no fatigue with the front. well, okay, yes, hammer 150mm howitzers again. you see, 625 million. that 's all that makes a profit, they don't get tired of it. yes, yes, that's why statements appear. so these vushniks who openly tell what commands they receive you saw it 100% let's show everything yes, let's. let's get out of here,

the commander said, shoot everyone at cars at home, throw grenades at mushrooms. there are no civilians there for us, when we went there, we realized that we had no connection, we were abandoned. and we don't know what to do, we couldn't clear every cellar. we decided to concentrate in places of abandoned houses and wait for the morning. the next morning. we saw that people from from a nearby cellar, a young woman came out with a three-month-old baby. we were told, well, what is this war, too. maybe i think it was a criminal order. well, this is a war too. maybe kill everyone. they just didn't improve. we couldn't clean every basement , every cellar. but this is what we have, we need to somehow stop it all. you don't think so. we just need to do something so that these people, about whom the president spoke, would stop. it's so simple. and by the way, you said that it reacts to what is happening on the front line. why did i

say? what yes, everyone was waiting there in the west in ukraine, all these bots were waiting. they were waiting for words of mobilization. you saw how in the first minute after the announcement of partial mobilization. the sea has gone. they were immediately abandoned, abandoned, a bunch. fake, fake order of the governor, there in the belgorod region, some fake orders, fake videos. that's instantly, that is, no, how much did you prepare for that's it for this phase, with regard to these terrible shots? that's why i incidentally and i wanted to draw your attention to the fact that when you cited the words of american leaders here, that we are going to bomb? crimea i wanted to recall that from this wednesday. uh, in general, for us, the bombing of the zaporizhia region, kherson and donetsk - this is the same thing, that is, it is absolutely true an attack on russian territory on the territory of the russian federation to rob citizens of the russian federation while back in the west these shots . uh, they don't

show. this is at best, but more often than not, as it was, let's say. here with the shelling of the column civilians who were traveling, mind you, into the territory controlled by russia of the russian federation, yes. and how do i remember now, the career of de lasser? yes moscow's revenge moscow takes revenge on ukrainian citizens for its defeats in the background. remember, when they published photos from donetsk, these terrible i'm talking about more recent footage. right now yes , simply, because they actually do it. this is the first time i have them there, everything is stable in this and this one. look now to the scandal. there is no such time now. i mean, they've been around for a long time information resources have switched to the mode of hostilities, they already sneeze at everything that our liberals told us about freedom of speech , democracy, facts, and so on. they all equated the pen with the bayonet and absolutely thrashed all of these.

the masks that they said there about the need to check the facts, quotes to verify the photos, then in those fakes that you correctly noticed, once the humanization of the russians has already passed into a new stage. all this has already taken place. now they are sadistic and savor the details of how to tear apart russians. i am quoting this i get pleasure from uh personality from legs and arms, which i see russian and have not seen this article. i have seen other articles. there are others , too, but no. we have seen to decide for ourselves, we are looking at one eye, and now we will not be able to use the other. you didn't hear. they are enjoying the view from the limbs of the russian soldiers, so that i repeat this for the first time to you this was quoted by the times newspaper. you this week. that, i repeat, we will now

interrupt, we will return to this fate in just a minute. we will continue the conversation with our guests. the victim died a week before the trial. it’s impossible to give up on him and there are no clues . and that there weren’t any witnesses, there was one witness, but she refused to testify at the fishery, and then left the country for a long time, they didn’t see her here and that’s it. you have no idea what kind of people they are doing nothing . ekaterina rednikova. marat basharov so it's you dmitry under his nose.

this program is true, we continue to talk with our guests, and finish the situation in ukraine. we are with you. now you have seen yesterday all the british newspapers came out with this story that the russians created me on the oskoltom river in the kharkov region. yes and look, they show the box with gold teeth, which are crowns yes, that's it, here, she pulled out the teeth of the sventsam from dead and living ukrainians. yes, and mind you on wednesday evening on wednesday the day before, the bild had already shown an interview with a local dentist, he is the only one there for everything. cool. yes, this is my box. yes, these are mine. they are not gold metal crowns. well, why did the british already know. what is this fairy what it? of course, well, no one was embarrassed. why because it is necessary to continue this line to the fact that russians are not people. look, you mentioned

british training. sunday is a huge last sunday with a sandetai. uh, a photo report of many strips about what ukrainians are trained for, yes, and they are trained so that they can continue to kill, so the officer says, british the main task is to increase their level of e- lethality so that they are even without hands without legs, could continue to kill and their specially actors hired to show limbs for make-up, no expense was spared, which lie around and so on. that 's what the ukrainians are being prepared for, so that they really die to attack all the ukrainians, but to take as many russian people to the grave as possible. this is what the western press has come to now. yes, there is a statement listraz, leiko, it is legal, annexation. putin in ukrainian territory is the latest act in his campaign to undermine democracy in violation of international law. we should not be led by those who want a conclusion

peaceful deals in exchange for ukrainian territories, they offer to pay with the lives of ukrainians for the illusion of peace, we will stand on the side of our ukrainian friends. no matter how long it takes, ukraine can win ukraine must win and ukraine will win, you know, yes, when i uh hmm watch the tras, i just look at the face. she's vicious. this is visible. yes, no, because i treat her well, yes, in quotation marks, because she is evil and nevertheless, this person here, uh, works now as the prime minister of britain this is her position, and they will continue to do what you talked about, how to stop them? who has the answer, listen to you, it means, two words can be before roman grigorievich georgievich set us the task of finding out. here is the nuclear threat - is it crazy

or is it really acting people who generate this idea, and our discussion led to the understanding that this is real, uh, a thought that has now been thrown into the information space, that is, they have created information and propaganda circuits in europe and uh, the agenda - it will be russia use nuclear weapons, but we did not consider one model against whom they committed terrorist acts on our nord stream strings. it was against europe why did europe become their allies began to get out of subordination, they demand who exactly began to get out of subordination. please remind germany no. e voters from subordination would begin to walk. yeah , those instructions that their leaders receive from

washington and now the government is starting to change, voters do not want to vote for that government, which, uh, is subordinate to washington. this is pre-empting about this already many articles. there is. they want to crush europe to do this, they blew up the pipeline yes, they agree, and now europe needs to be intimidated by the fact that nuclear weapons will now be used. do whatever it takes. and what exactly is needed, and not to vote and not to demand, in order to mitigate sanctions against russia yeah. this is the first we did not consider this model, and it seems to me that it is impossible to drop sochi that washington is worried that the allies are losing control. and they still need to be crushed, so that later they demanded money. and if there is any war between nato and russia, then money will be needed to restore european cities. and this is

the output of the session history. it seems to me to ask for the sake of god. yes, it seems to me that if there is a war between nato and russia, no money will be needed to restore any cities, but it seems to me, or maybe not. we still said that nuclear weapons would not be used. now complete allow colleagues darvalsya. yes, yes to the end to say, of course , a nuclear warhead is difficult to use. and here repeat what was very chernobyl, maybe why uh-huh but still? doesn't rush the uk forces for swiss operations to capture, er, the zaporizhzhya reflection. i was just saying, yes, what kind of groups they are preparing there. yes, to make a nuclear strike out of it, while it is to which nato does not respond. why because we will not answer, we will explain to the whole world that

we did not use it, as always, but they use their resource. they know what they will try to do in the beginning. they are here for us this very thing, and sent mister grosse, and they will simply try to deceive us again. they are the same, they are the world champions in these games. now he will tell us. i was in kiev which means they said this , wow. but you guys, yes, so that this all happens. yes? let's take it anyway. yes, we will make this security zone, and we simply give you a 100% guarantee that nothing will happen in the area of ​​the zaporozhye station. and we will also increase it. we are the presence, and we are still and we will take it there. well , as an example there, i don’t know, let’s take some guys and with weapons there from india from pakistan there or from some or from turkey, which we have, the peacekeeper of a world scale will place them there, and everything will be fine zaporozhye station , i hope that the russians are such fools and now i will go for it. this information and propaganda

circuit may end. the zaporozhye nuclear power plant will be given to the whole world that we are already using tactical nuclear weapons. ugh and turned off. naturally, the last point must be taken into account. this is the third position of the two we played the third position, due to the fact that both sides began active statements in favor of the possibility of negotiations. that is, to translate the conflict into a diplomatic policy, e, we are on the plane, and from our side we are already open today, e matvi. i asked her too, i don't understand. well, to be honest, i just opened this opportunity. tno, yes, wait a minute, we said a lot today that we do not understand. we talked a lot today, but you must agree that from that side, these

fierce body-throwing from that side. this is an attempt to take the position that we will be on the part of ukraine, we will dictate the terms. we are speaking from our positions. here they are in a hurry until the moment when 300,000 arrive on the territory of ukraine, or rather, the southeast is to blame for the territory of russia, the former ukraine is on the territory of ukraine, too. you are probably talking about this, right? and to ukraine, yes, yes, now my friends have now told everyone, yes, i will now. note. now we are talking about our new rhetoric. we are discussing now. i have some incomprehensible negotiations. we we are now discussing a reactive nuclear strike. here, i would like to see a hybrid war now that i constantly repeat. look, this is happening right now and ours is not the failure that we have now suffered. i believe that this is exactly where the competence of our military leadership is for sure, and this is how these questions are asked to our

minister of defense, general shoigu, what is happening there. this is exactly what has now given grounds to speak in this way. this rhetoric was not always rhetoric. well, of course, ukraine say, of course russia will win. well, how can we compare the potential. and now they are this one, by the way, the track is just an example. or maybe we can, or maybe, well, of course, it is . it's obvious. it's obvious. yes, look at the mythology they wrote. so we gave them this, this, i don't know . they did something there. here, look what we are missing now in the information space, so we gave it. yes, they need another. uh, the very story, yes to spend and etc., as they say before death they will try to breathe in there. here is what they will decide. and so i think that this should really be the final one, right? here, what is the reality on

the field today. boy. a strategic impasse with a certain preponderance, for example, temporary in favor of ukraine's actions, because it, e, indicated partial tactical successes in the kharkiv region in the kherson region, but in general, the strategic impasse is a diplomatic impasse, but now we will revive the deformations later, i know , yes, there are no grounds for negotiations, because ukraine decided that there will be no negotiations with the current russian president. the foreign ministry answered, then we will wait for the next president of ukraine. well, all forms are still waiting for the next president of the united states of america. triple expectation is mutual, there is a diplomatic dead end. and now that in this situation, perhaps, uh, practically inevitable, and conflict for trying.

again a turning point, either on one side or the other, on the ukrainian side there is hope for a radical fracture. now they will add. we will receive weapons e patriot e, anti-missile air defense a new himers with a firing range of 300 km will appear, then everything, the fifth tenth tanks will appear in hundreds e yes, and then a radical change on the exact side. ah, from the russian side. what well, in addition to the fact that 300,000, which we have called, we will learn a little about them in 3 months. as you colorfully very correctly described, er, farmers and workers. now let's learn for 3 months. they will appear there and what a radical change happens, so, uh, i want to say again that uh , this is a dead end. uh, it can only be overcome by some very serious arguments, uh, military technical or a powerful diplomatic initiative, but i still don’t see either, or if you

don’t read the diplomatic initiative, uh, then our wonderful mask, to which special thanks, don’t we also have erdogan, who is also trying to come up with the initiative. yes, with the device of opportunity with the americans. i mean russia in relation to ukraine and europe because russia considers the infrastructure of ukraine and europe to be the sphere of its vital interests; the americans do not consider this; they will bomb europe there with atomic weapons for the americans. it did not go, it did not go, but for russia this is an important moment. i’m very happy for johnson’s fights. unlike many, i didn’t worry at all that he would be the worst prime minister of britain. when i saw who the candidate or stras was, i realized that he definitely wouldn’t be the worst prime minister, but i’m the one who will come, after a liter it will be even worse about the general process, i see. well, everything goes, well, now in relation to ukraine, her statement. yes she says that the world in exchange for the territory of this will not. i remember johnson who is in negotiations. and i just spectators who forgot

ukraine had at least four chances to resolve this situation through political and diplomatic means. it was minsk-1. it was minsk-2, then it was paris, remember december 9 , 1919, and the last time. istanbul had two or two chances for president poroshenko and two chances for president zelensky, neither one nor the other took advantage, as a result heeded the advice of fighting johnson western partners. now the overall result. here you think about the comparable consequences for ukraine , just think about the adoption of the minsk agreements, which implied the restoration of the territorial integrity of ukraine, except for crimea, and that's all. what has already happened now is that i am talking about the advice that johnson gives more and she continues to do the same. here is the result. what, then, they said and urged we cannot negotiate. we need to get over you. and speaking positions, i

i'm embarrassed to ask, but the loss of four regions of ukraine is a more advantageous position. better you swung right here swung at the beautiful. well, why are you actually there? i don’t know, they stopped at the minsk agreements. let's rewind a little deeper, which prevented, in general, in principle, from not touching the status of the russian language, which prevented us from staging coup d'état, which prevented us from making a stupid statement about some kind of nato bases in the crimean sevastopol region, if all this was not with the front balych. wouldn't be nothing at all as the president said, he basically said that they tried to shovel there. if you do not know health, back out. in the same place where the entrance came in, as well as come out about the negotiations, friends. in short, here is such a metaphor for very little time. honestly little time is everything, so let's look at the poll results. we spent on the ntv website this as

about the negotiations of these very simple questions with whom to negotiate peace in ukraine and three options three options. look, 93% of people talk to no one for sure. deceived. but tell me that these people are wrong. we are already the rest. here are four here acting three from the future, there and so on. yes, and we perfectly understand who we are dealing with. well, it's just that 's why such people are very deceived, everyone will be deceived. all that i'm talking about, uh, and why is it all thanks to everyone . this is to the fact that there is no need to conduct any negotiations. and there is no need to make any statements at all about these very negotiations. in the end , we have to start with this. so when i asked what we need to do in order to to turn the tide, we must finally decide whether we are ready for these negotiations, or we will not conduct any negotiations with them and will seek our own. the goals that were

outlined at the very beginning, because, well, it ca n't be that we're saying the same thing today. tomorrow we say something else the day after tomorrow the big boss says the third. and another big boss, he says, the fourth one doesn't work like that. we must already formulate our own position once and for all. denocification means denocification, a there i don't know, demilitarization. so liberation means liberation and that's it. and you need to be consistent in this direction and of course , of course, all heroic statements. and there in the distance on the distant. as they say in the distant capitals, and hmm, these people in kiev explain all this and are closely connected with the situation that is in the zone of a special military operation, as soon as we transfer this situation, we will take this initiative again with our own hands, so that we each day woke up did not read the news about the fact that we leveled the front line there. we did not let them take

them, they are advancing in two battalions in groups. we are on the defensive, we need to regain this initiative so that we read the news that we approached this population and took this really different twentieth and as soon as we did that, they will stop making belligerent statements. and they will stop telling us that they will deliver something to someone in order to hit crimea or any other russian region there. this is absolutely, so we will be able to do it, of course, if ukraine has any chance of defeating us. no, conquer yourself. we can only do this, yes. to prevent us from preventing ourselves there at all, we are world champions here, but for this it is necessary to actually pull ourselves together and act exactly along the path that i spoke about and ukraine has no chance, neither military nor military mobilization resource component, despite these endless supplies.

she has none of this, and i'm not even talking about nuclear weapons there. let's hope it's just not needed. something like this, meet through week in this studio and remember that all participants in our programs have their own truth, but we will always get to the bottom of the wall. putin's policy certainly has its own style. putin refers to the rational, he himself is rational and refers to the rational in foreign policy in addressing the people in any of his actions and undertakings. he believes that the world is reasonable. putin, of course, is a westerner, like peter the great

they say about putin that he never screams and in a rage, if he is furious, he says, even quieter with putin's policy, of course.

has its own style. putin turns to the rational , he is rational himself and turns to the rational in foreign policy in his appeals to the people in any of his actions and undertakings. he believes that the world is reasonable, what he does when he gets tired. he still gets tired, for example, of the stupidity and baseness of the world, the surrounding partners on the planet, yes, and sometimes we don’t know our subordinates, having lived with our supreme boss, as he is called in the kremlin , for a whole, essentially life. we didn't know much about him. but maybe we don't need the old days. i still stopped it. putin had very big personal meetings with musicians, for example, with milkmaids. there with engineers with writers with filmmakers, when there were big conversations in my life several times, i participated in them, but i would not say about their high productivity, he seems to have

expected a serious conversation, but it turned out to be a leapfrog of opinions and unnecessary fuss. now there are no such meetings . well, maybe this is no longer necessary. they say he doesn't read social networks, all sorts of blogs, but sometimes he watches tv on tv. taking this opportunity, you can say hello to him . whose portrait hangs on the wall in the president's office have you seen? pay attention, when they show it next time on tv, there is peter i putin, of course, a westerner, like peter the great, moreover, he is certainly a liberal, he can be a russian liberal, the last in russia, our other public liberals are not russian liberals. these are the liberals of some other country, like the westerner

and liberal putin gave the western liberal world all possible signals here, we are ours, we are the same as you, we extend the hand of friendship to you and, if necessary, we extend a helping hand to you, ask, and now we are here with our help. we know how to be generous like no one else. well, in response, he was told all these years. give your sovereignty over here. we are the answer. well, no, we're talking about friendship, we're not talking about surrender they and we are about friendship. let's sovereignty here and be friends february 10, 2007 . vladimir putin spoke at the munich security conference. he then offered the world new rules of the game, warning about the consequences of maintaining the old foundations. we see more and more accepted tension, the fundamental principles of international law more than that, individual norms. this is, in fact, almost the entire

system of law of one state. states have crossed their national borders and, in fact, in all spheres, both in the economy and in politics and in the humanitarian sphere, they are imposed by another state. well, who will like it? who will like it putin pointed to the dangerous strategy of the united states of america and nato forces, which came abnormally close to the russian borders, and stressed that russia would pursue an independent foreign policy, it seems, only now we can fully appreciate what and why this speech was about. think clearly the process of nato enlargement has nothing to do with the modernization of the alliance itself or with security in europe, on the contrary. this is a serious provoking factor that reduces the level of mutual trust. and we have a fair right to frankly ask against whom?