and what do you want it? you know that the russian post was like that, we are lost, you understand, we can’t understand what russia wants. and you think you could talk or talk over. uh, negotiate on the subject. now because, and putin is so high in the exhibition. yes, it’s so cool when it’s a referendumonex, now it’s impossible, because ukraine will never agree to the return of this territory of the kherson region of the zaporozhye region. this is completely, uh, excluded, therefore, on the contrary, on the contrary, and ukraine with the support of the west, but continue here is the congress attack on the kherson region. maybe the offensive there is tu-tu-tu, therefore, tomorrow we exclude this option. just here, let's try to simulate the situation there. and you exclude the option that it will pass, let's say for some more time. that's how much has already passed there since these turkish negotiations, well, six months. yes, here's another six months,

let it pass, and we will actually talk again on the same topic, but at the same time, referendums will be held, for example, there in nikolaevskoye, odessa, dnepropetrovsk regions. eliminate this option, then only worse, of course, worse, therefore, therefore, it may make sense, as they say, now put an end to this, or still we will drag it out. it’s not worth it until those same results, like and this question has never been raised, neither in the russian empire, nor in russia and ukraine, the leadership, the same principles that aggression came to the territory of ukraine is the only return. it is to drive this aggression out of ukrainian territory, and they argued from this point of view. yes. from what point of view are they come out? yes, listen, nikolai, you wanted to say, you know, you asked if the ground for negotiations and, in my opinion, is the main ground, that is, for the

sake of what. in order for politicians to meet, and the head of state to discuss the existing territorial disputes. it is obvious that at the moment, today, friday, october 14, it is impossible. that's all now you understand, especially direct negotiations. but the question the fact that the shootout was stopped killing people, this is absolutely relevant very er, well, let's just say a sad task. this is, of course, biden's answer about what he does not plan. meet with putin, among other things. this is happening, because, in my opinion, there is, uh, the idea of ​​very many that it is impossible, uh, the use of nuclear weapons and uh, it will not come to this under any circumstances. in no way is this an erroneous idea, because that the risk and intensity are so high that in general the main task now is the negotiations. this to move away from the threat of the use of nuclear weapons. and here in this. that is, just the leaders of the world's largest powers, i understand. look, you are talking, here, but you can agree

without discussing it. bye. here are some other territorial and non-territorial issues, you can agree on a ceasefire, it's just pointless to go on without it. yes, i remember. you probably also remember that this happened repeatedly before february 24 more than once. it was and was even introduced there, observers there were various organizations of the osce not the osce, and how it all ended. and you know what everything is. this ended with the fact that it was ukraine that did not withdraw from there, for example, heavy weapons systems that were supposed to be withdrawn under the agreement; according to this, it was ukraine that entered those very gray zones that could not be touched at all. and they were supposed to be a buffer. and they are creeping creeping there. these are the captures of these very gray zones, and each time they talked about what it was, by and large, victory and shelling and shelling shelling. so how do you talk to them? that's why? team so we need to come up with such a pharmacy, no one has ever been in the world in such a configuration in which we are.

now. so, it is necessary to come up with such guarantees of such intermediaries of such participants in these negotiations that everyone knows, because everyone really understands and thinks about the danger, for example, from the same zaporozhye nuclear power plant everyone understands. well, should it be a responsibility. i understand, well, i also understood that they, whether you understand it or not, must understand. we must be guarantors and intermediaries. in this case. here's the negotiation. yes , sergeych, so, uh. let's turn to history, dear friends. e french invite historians. uh, so for centuries, all these conflicts. oh, uh, settled under the same pattern. at first , nikolai is absolutely right; first, a ceasefire as a condition for meaningful negotiations. well, uh negotiations to accompaniment uh, volleys of cannons and scorers there. we are often with her, they will break at any moment, which means they have ceased fire so that

meaningful negotiations could be conducted, therefore, as soon as a signal sounds from the other side. we are ready for meaningful negotiations. let's cease fire further. uh, hmm, in general, all the centuries of war, if a peace treaty was concluded, then it is always the same model. this world in exchange for territory was not a single exception in the history of mankind. i think that in this case the first precedent will not be the formula of peace in exchange for territories in all peace treaties. open any now in the archive everywhere she yes, that's even elon musk not being a historian, he proposes a formula exactly for this business model. god be with him, the president of france, there is a macron's statement. let's see what the president of france has to say. at some point and i wish it is as soon as possible, it is necessary that all parties return to negotiations. ukraine will simply be obliged to

do this zelensky asks me to send a certain amount of weapons. i must leave some of them for us to defend ourselves and nato's eastern flank france helps ukraine to resist on its soil, but not in order to attack russia, we are not a party to this conflict. yes. that's any scheme you're talking about, even if it works. you see, this is why i have doubts, because i look at these guys who offer us all these negotiations and who i see there. look, i see erdogan. turkish president, and who seems to be today, no matter how he spoke with vladimir putin on the topic of ukraine although i have big doubts, it means that erdogan all the time says, let me organize this meeting there. we will agree. this bad world is just erdogan's story. yes, diplomatically , all these conflicts must be resolved there, and what does erdogan do

? erdogan supplies bayraktar to ukraine so that it kills our soldiers. and what's more, they make another statement that we won't do it for any money . uh, in fact, to cooperate with russia in the production of drones never in my life, they deliver there. these traits are hedgehogs. these are armored vehicles. they supply everything they can they deliver to ukraine and make statements even there, starting, as they say from the crimean times about their support for ukraine, france , another peacemaker see, what songs did my favorite macron character sing? it turns out that ukraine, as he said, will be obliged to sit down at some point. yes, at the negotiating table the question is why ukraine will have to sit down at the negotiating table, if you supply it with everything that you can supply novice leaders. i don't have one for you. that's why that's why sergei borisovich i have big

doubts, vladimir vladimirovich and i have a question about the streets, swindle, what will he tell us on this topic. he also owns the left hand for negotiating the delivery of the rim. cunning. that's not all. there is no one who is for negotiations? this is not even for internal use. this is such a round word is cunning and let's leave the usual normal human word. lie. more how they lie. here's how the rod and macron, for example, lie, because he needs not only macron's weapons there for his own use, greece, they are allies and turkish-greek tension already. excuse me, last month 200 times the turks sec. the space of the air space of greece and the greeks 130 times the air space of turkey is the planes barrage the military constantly and i can. it seems to me that this is not an obstacle conflict, azerbaijan does not see the picture of the macron. you probably also saw this is worth macron and with all the health with the president of azerbaijan from the president of turkey with the

prime minister of armenia is normal. everything is fine. here he will cope, just like that about the scholz. here is a direct question, a direct answer, so in germany is supplying a flight with these air defense systems, which seem to be there for 20 km by 40 km, but in fact these supplies that come from germany this is only part of the supplies that nato supplies and these german air defense systems that seem to be for low-flying short-range targets there are 40 km away. yes, yes, they are designed specifically to work with the american system. no, there is not, six countries have developed this system, and they always work in the park, that is, the following. by code, they will now send another air defense that is already closing for 300 km, and then it turns out that the ukrainian sky will be completely closed from the point of view of what i have now heard in the west, there is no scheme for negotiations. this is no. i'm sure he generally says we're closing the sky. that's what ukraine says, you scolded. uh, i'm sorry, you

scolded the turkish leader. and meanwhile the worse sensible thing he said is that e inevitable negotiations, if they are, yes, they must be two-story. and that first you need to get together without kiev, first going. e, uk states germany france plus russia so they see how big the conflict is, because it is geopolitical because it concerns the security structure in general in europe, the munich agreement the two they made. and how can they agree without zelensky’s ukraine in the reception? and in the waiting room, how is it already? they observed their time, yes, they will quickly decide everything there. you want territories, take these territories, take them too. take these too. these here, probably, are not needed in their entirety, and then he will be told, come here. so, yes, practical understanding is achieved at this level, they i have already seen the president of the zelensky house,

this is not my proposal. i already remember erdogan. here is what sergei borisovich listed - this is the leadership of nato in essence. yes? their position is december 21. we say, give guarantees not the entry of ukraine, our doors are open. and now the doors of nato are open, closed, weapons are rushing from there, what is it with the doors that we have nato open or not? there is no open for everyone, then what to talk about, if we were refused in december, we will return now, besides, the question is more open doors there now finland sweden shoved herself in. well, yes, but the only thing i'm talking about them is about their version of the negotiations. well, i understand, and here it is. hmm. i agree with vadim vladimirovich who says that they are lying, but they are trying to lull our activity. but there are no others , i can’t find other versions yet. there is a version of erdogan's plan . and where the plan of russia is one tough plan , i can start, i will briefly say there is one tough plan of

negotiations. perhaps if there is a humanitarian catastrophe in ukraine, then everything will be on the side, the humanitarian catastrophe that has now led after the bombing of the infrastructure. right now in europe they are clearly talking about if a humanitarian catastrophe approaches the crisis, for example, 5 million refugees from ukraine to europe within a week, they are ready to put pressure on ukraine so that ukraine starts negotiating not capitulation. namely , to stop the fire, that's all. well, this is just an illustration of that, here. uh, how the peacekeepers act although these guys are just a peacemaker. yes, the t-shirt is here, only the west is seeking its own, which means allies. uh ramping up the production of armaments to transfer kia to increase their arsenals, tam and so on and so forth. yes, with regard to the humanitarian catastrophe, but look at another statement by president putin yes, where do i have it, that we are not going to destroy ukraine yes, and about the blows that we inflicted, there is this synchronism. let's run. massive strikes now uh,

other tasks are worth it, because uh out of my opinion. in my opinion, there are seven 29 objects there, which means that it was not hit, as it was planned by the ministry defense, but these objects are getting about them gradually and there is no need for massive strikes, but in any case, for now, but it will be seen there. and there was a phrase that it will be seen there, but the mood found the president is understandable, they all take advantage of his kindness, in general, do you have a feeling like that? yes , he says, they delivered these blows. well, this is enough for now, each time michael gives a chance to stop a ceasefire, but at the same time, none of this happens, and vice versa, the requirements. that's how your secretary of defense turnaround. it causes an absolutely opposite reaction from the west. and if

, for example, the russian president would speak and say, i made a decision to command, and to wipe everything that is there in ukraine from the face of the earth would be different, it would lead to peace faster. what do you think, on the contrary, it was only worse. and what does michael need to do to make the world happen? it is necessary to stop this disgrace to stop the disgrace. i think that how the president would talk about readiness for negotiations. he only had one. a variant of views is a variant in which the situation at the front, when it will change not in the ukrainian side and ukraine will begin to suffer a military catastrophe, then in this case we will be ready to talk with it. why because right away. yes, in this case, why do we need to negotiate with someone now, uh, you just found out, no one is ready to negotiate. why because all those who could have a talk with us all e september, seeing some

success in ukraine, hope that it will go further, but the british in general are already writing that now it’s not there today. tomorrow 35,000 people. this means that they go over to the offensive in the kherson zaporozhye direction, and they will return all these territories in just a few days. they have hope that it will go if it doesn’t work, and everything will go in the opposite direction, that is, ukraine will again begin to rub the territory of ukraine, it will begin to suffer military defeats in this case, of course, it will be necessary with ukraine. and, of course, in this case, everyone will immediately become ready for negotiations. uh-huh, the soil will immediately appear. uh-huh, i’ll repeat, bye, uh, they have ukraine for it, yes, they have there will be a question we will want to negotiate, when everything will be in our favor to say that we are always ready for negotiations, when there is something to negotiate the question in this case, again , what will we negotiate if we we will what is called own the initiative. now that's interesting. we will return to this fate in

just a few minutes and continue the conversation with our guests. and i'll show you the results of a survey that we conducted on the ntv website with interesting results. strive to become winner. turn any game in your favor, hone your skills and take records. we know that you cannot be stopped, because the same betting company, one of the official partner of hockey clubs, lokomotiv yaroslavl and dynamo moscow, are the same betting company. do not miss the events and people of the week on central television. range matters west still hesitant to give ukrainian military missiles that will reach kirov and voronezh but it seems kiev has found a way to push the leadership nato to a decision that may turn out to be fatal infrastructural, a world war is already on the verge of following the northern stream, everything that makes this world convenient and

modern can be under attack from gas storages, then the power lines of the internet, while the infrastructural saboteurs do not even hide, exactly where they plan to make their next strike. heat and light will be released on the cards, while brussels is discussing the price ceiling for russian oil the price of the energy crisis for europeans is growing every day, how europe will save electricity and gas, and will the coming winter be able to cool the hot head? this will be your central television tomorrow at 19:00 on ntv , watch fascinating, reality-turning avata shows. believes it's my last day on the titanic every time. you surprise with all the technologies of special effects. i missed the genie

on stage, thanks to cutting-edge technologies , unique avatars, hosted by show business stars, about a wonderful holiday, pinocchio host is performing with your virtual wedding sergei lazarev premiere of the new original musical show avatar tomorrow at 22:20 on ntv this program is true, we continue to talk with our guests about the situation in ukraine, and what is happening in belarus is also very interesting, what they have announced. at the beginning there was information that they had some kind of counter-terrorism. uh, the operation is starting. then, it seems, like a regime, it’s just that terrorist pay is increased there, what’s going on there, well, uh, belarus is under constant pressure, pressure is not diplomatic

military, because ukraine, on its e, as if on its border, is constantly raising, what is called and e, its group is constantly reconnaissance, because they, and all the time, are afraid that some kind of strikes will be inflicted from the territory of belarus. and, of course, it cannot but cause. but what is called the border conflict, while they are local, but it cannot be ruled out that ukraine , and at least lukashenka, is talking about this, that the hand is that ukraine will begin to move on to more radical actions. well look vladislav, i’m here. to figure it out, it’s being created. you see, there is an allied group of troops, the basis of which is this army of belarus, yes, and i tried to figure it out and mmm belarusians themselves. the actual leaders. they say that from the side of ukraine towards the belarusian border. there are no military units that are there, mainly those defenses that they are engaged in provocations are constantly shooting towards the belarusian one. and well, border guards there and so on and

so forth. and that they mined some roads, it turns out, look, kiev says that they they expect, but an attack from belarus and belarus says, no, i expect an attack from ukraine well, this is exactly the same stalemate where the incident was beaten, maybe even a shot for a hunting rifle, relatively speaking, one of the lads went over a little vodka fired in the direction of, uh, a border post earlier or killed a border guard and it started and, in principle, it started at the same time. eh, again, you need to understand that not always. it will be someone's team. i repeat very often. it's u love beautiful syndrome performer. to put it simply, blow, you see, we know a lot of examples of the beginning of very large conflicts that started around this. well, by the way, half of the conflicts until recently, before the great war between armenia and azerbaijan, began with something like this, when one checkpoint started shooting differently, and then everyone started to connect. and what is called went out

for a whole, say, a week of war there, then they began to figure out who, why, and no one could figure it out. why is it clear there is another a moment that also needs to be said. well, this is just a discrepancy between the words of the minister of foreign affairs. and uh, lukashenka it is, oddly enough. now it is being interpreted, also in the astrological sense, because for a long time rumors have been constantly circulating that both americans and europeans. all the time looking for in the immediate environment. lukashenko people who do. situations x if anything, they will be ready to intervene. and what is called to save belarus from tyrants. and just now, these are some such hard discrepancies. agree that mode and what is called boost - these are completely different things. and again, knowing about the vedans of the current minister of foreign affairs, and again our difficult relations with him at the level of russia and belarus , for whom he always sawed before, so to speak, it

is quite possible that there is content under these rumors. well there is a good statement. he gave interviews to lukashenka, yes to the americans. by the way, yes, they are from him according to the americans, in my opinion, yes, they asked him. where is it? where is it? where we have it synchronously. let's listen to lukoshenko. yes they he was asked about nuclear weapons. the most important thing is your interlocutor. and don't even corner the enemy, so don't, uh, cross those lines like the russians say the reds. you can't cross the lines, but nikolay how do you think in general, in principle, very many experts. now they are saying that, mm, that's exactly what will be done now. actually the rate of the ukrainian side. they can blow up some nonsense. well, like some kind of dirty bomb and they will blame us for everything , and here you are, please, the beginning of all this. well, such a scenario was clearly visible, but it seems to me, the first provocation. well, the conditional scenario is being

imported. a certain nuclear device from the territory of germany, the americans, in general, from russian intelligence, data from a warehouse where all kinds of weapons are located, i emphasize a rocket with a conventional warhead. all this is furnished and they themselves initiate a nuclear explosion. they say, look , the rocket has taken off. here she got. here is the atomic bomb. what other evidence do you have that russia allegedly used this provocation this week. well crossed out put a fat cross on them. first, putin then lavrov clearly said, we will not be the first to use nuclear weapons and there is a nuclear doctrine on the territory of ukraine. it means that there are completely different cases there, so this provocation can be considered, so to speak, worked out, but i think that the statement hmm by nato leaders that they are starting to rearm the ukrainian industry of the military-industrial complex was very dangerous . we are not talking about the

minister of defense met from stoltenberg and the statement that ukraine is de facto already in nato. here you go and rearmament danger. why are ukrainian scientists now in quotes inventing a dirty bomb? they will invent a dirty bomb, in fact, under the guidance of western curators, they will give it to them. and then the question arises purely hypothetically , the kiev regime is in a difficult military situation, they use this dirty bomb, because russia should react to this michael how should russia react to it react it is excluded. you see, it's out of the question again. why is it excluded why the americans don't need it, because they believe that ukraine is doing a good job without this option without. and if she starts, that is. well, deal with it. yes now he is reading that the counter-offensive is proceeding effectively. wait, mikes, because they put the question to you a little differently, if everything is bad, they don’t

say in ukraine that here it will feel wonderful there, it captures 28,000 cities a day. and at the same time, she will detonate a bomb, but this is not what we are talking about, that everything will be bad in ukraine, but she will do it, then what. you should react. well, of course, russia should react, and that's it. well, tough, but tough. that is why the united states will not do this, so as not to provoke this reaction from the russian side. you are aware that ukraine periodically does something like this. from which even the americans, in fact, come to be bewildered that they themselves were not made, a leak, a leak into politics, in my opinion, that they, as it were, pulled back by the us special services. e koreans because of attempts above the level that it should not have been done, that is, they scolded them ukrainians. yes indeed. and what are the consequences of this abuse? here, look michael. you didn’t

listen to me, you did something terrible, while i continue to give you money and weapons to say that i will support you without urgent. what is my condemnation of the mikes in a newspaper article or in deeds? by their deeds you will recognize them, they give weapons money unlimitedly, lead the fighting. he's a friend showing cnn clips there, uh, an officer firing a highmars in english, the team is also open, yeah, so what's the condemnation? stop giving money to weapons and it'll all be over in a week. yes, yes, but not in favor, ukraine yes , it ended for you, that in favor of ukraine ended. yes, on the contrary, it is necessary that it ends in our favor and we will quickly agree on everything else likes, but this is unacceptable for not for ukraine, not for the west, but. well, indeed, yes, your mistake is the usa, usa a will be transferred, and it is precisely this air defense a

and maybe the patriots of this kv- system so that, and there were no repetitions of these massive beavers, like those we saw on monday and tuesday. although a must say it uh, western war experts. they believe that ah, there were very few purely military poses. and how so intimidating, but yes, a good driver, fireworks, this is it really. ah. this impressed when the war, for example, hit the iraqi olympic committee. there was also no sense of the military, and then you applied just wiped off the face of the earth. just every 100 meters. and you hit on this territory, where there was, uh, the palace of adam hussein and the working offices of the vice-presidents of iraq and the residence of the tariq of asia for the vice-premier iraq and so on, you know, the government quarter roman was beaten by billy what was the military meaning of absolutely everything, if you take all

these stories, these cases are most often this history this solution does not work does not work does not work. look at the israelis, all these acts of intimidation when they bomb, when they are amgi. they don't bomb. take for example, when during the korean and vietnamese, and the vietnamese war, when the united states did what russia did to ukraine, it was simply cooler. this is what it did to the koreans and to the vietnamese. no, on the contrary, it provoked a sharp reaction from the sponsors of north korea and north vietnam, i mean, beijing and moscow, they supplied even more weapons, the same as in the united states. this caused a backlash, that is, the united states will supply borscht weapons to ukraine as the soviet union eventually reacted when the us thank you michael here is one replica.

look, as soon as the united states left vietnam, vietnam immediately united and there were no problems between the northern and southern vietnamese. before so far it has not been observed, as soon as the united states leaves ukraine there will be a unification of the russian people and there will be no problems, then you bring it, you finance, of course, anti support ukraine we will close this topic. and then we will quickly agree on everything with you. everything will be well assured that you are now a reality. say yes, i don’t know sergey, i reason like that. you think it's unrealistic. e. well, i think it's very unlikely what you're saying. you go away, you stop. and we then uh, very unreal some scenario. well, let's talk about another scenario then. let's have a statement by dmitry anatolyevich medvedev let's see how he sees the solution in general. it is this problem that the ukrainian state in its current configuration with the nazi

political regime will pose a constant direct and clear threat to russia, therefore, in addition to protecting our people and protecting the country's borders, the goal of our future actions. in my opinion, there should be a complete dismantling of the political. the regime of ukraine and i also have volodin's statement to the speakers state duma let's see what the swamp thinks on this topic nowhere in the world do they negotiate with terrorists, if the attacks by the kiev regime continue, the answer will be even tougher all the organizers. the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks must be found, who will be destroyed by the resistance, that is, such rather tough statements, in contrast to the statement of vladimir putin yes, who says that we are not going to dismantle ukraine there at all yes, but what do you think? here sergeevich but what is your personal position? here is a more difficult question for me like, yeah, a peacemaker and a christian pacifist, i consider everyone a poseidon, yes, like everyone else, actually

pacifists. yes, i believe that all conflicts must be resolved with great love, that at some point we must all see the light. yes, we must take to the streets with the pressure of psalms and banners. e. the script will return your question to you. this is reality from my point of view, the best scenario, which is closer to me, but, unfortunately, since i would like little to happen, therefore, most likely, there will be another scenario and or more love, but it is in this case until it works or great fear. that's a big fear that can stop further escalation. in the meantime, there is an escalation towards the third world war. and why is the escalation stage by stage closer to the third, because there is no great fear. i understand. here is the big fear they said, instead the big kazakhs stance. medvedev is closer no, well, no, that's fear.

wait, this is a separate genre. well, i don't compete. volodya uh, big fear. they must know that great fear will be destroyed, respectively, we are talking about something else. here. shui fear, uh, he helped overcome the slide into the third world war during the cuban missile crisis since then, unfortunately, he has retired from uh, global geopolitics, he has. and if not, if there is no e such a powerful regulator as a great fear, then everything is allowed , you can supply any type of weapon, anywhere. can you help? uh good. and what we do negotiations need to return, and fear. uh, about the third world war, that this is not some kind of bluff well, this is real, let's get closer sergeyevich how to do it? i ask good question very good. i all questions one better than the other. well

, to be honest, we are all for peace for negotiations, but we cannot understand how to negotiate and in what , in fact, there can be a compromise, which means that i want what i want not to lead us to a grandiose grind, roughly speaking. we know how to do it. i really know. here's what i want. i already said. and now the forecast. what i don't want so i don’t want to, but this is likely to happen in the near future, nuclear weapons tests will be resumed. uh, they have not been conducted for decades. and no one really knows. is it possible, uh, will some kind of nuclear charge work. now there is a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty of 1996 . uh, here, most likely, uh, russia will have to, uh, signed and ratified to withdraw from this treaty and resume nuclear weapons testing at the northern test sites. i do not want. but this is my prediction. here, look sergey will happen. the nearest one as soon as possible. you are just a cosander. here, look sergeevich, about 14 countries will need to participate in

these teachings. in what teachings means if you say you see me this story. so, there is no need to prepare for strategic attention, sergey, nuclear exercises, nuclear, this is what it is about. he says look around. it is strange, then, that the blocs will participate in these exercises, which will take place 600 miles 600 miles away, just from russia, these exercises are not connected with any real world events, but they are not connected. well, of course, they are generally on their own yes , or with what russia is doing in the exercises they will fighter jets are involved. however, they will not carry warheads, that is, training with imitation nuclear bombing every year. do you believe in general, i understand that i follow this, they are held annually near the border of russia, which means that these exercises are not connected with any real world events, annual regular routine. we learn lost near russia every year. but

for some reason it seems to me that as they say vladimir vladimirovich, look, and then what happens to toltenberg there tells, look we have. is there. yes, we have let's russian exercises are held annually. they check and test their nuclear forces there. we will keep an eye on it as always. we are good at gathering information. we have been monitoring russia's nuclear potential for many decades. we will continue to monitor them closely and remain vigilant. it remains only for us to make a statement that these exercises are in no way connected with what ukraine is doing, and in no way connected with what is happening in general, in principle, both in the world and not pay attention to it. and in general, in these exercises, ours will not have anything there, but in general there will be nothing and the machine guns will be wooden , and then we will all believe each other. we will believe kirby they will believe us here you are, the return of this very fear that you are talking about, another side is conducting nuclear

exercises for a second, that fear has nothing to do with anyone at all. uh, in those who are not in real life, because everyone has long forgotten that after the second world war after the great patriotic war passed so many years that everyone forgot in real life what it is, to our great regret, they did not learn real lessons from how much peace should be protected. everything, i say, of the nuclear threat, indeed, everyone has already forgotten, what is it? well, people very often perceive what is happening now as an element. e series that is happening you have computer games in the news you have 10 lives there. here you have one two left. well, there are still eight left. let's go further, let's see what here seems to many to be war can be played, and therefore this is exactly what vladislav said that there is a very high threat of accidental conflict e various programmatic conflicts at different points in the

soviet space. this, unfortunately, is true, because on the one hand there is a low degree of fear, and on the other hand a very high degree, the intensity of the relationship of hatred and do not trust each other, yes. and the threshold of application hate huge and mistrust quite right. yes , that's right, so by the way, here's, uh, what it's about. e, he spoke. uh, sergei uh, stankevich at the beginning of the talks, well, let's say russia's largest u western powers. at least they are needed so that everyone can tell each other everything that is happening, all relationships understand each other's position. let it not come no decisions, but at least say everything we say. so each other has accumulated, you know, already . wait in public. and here publicly

or not publicly, what they are there no publicity macron didn’t come, he told him about it for two hours , then he called macron 44 times. and it was not public on our part. it was public from this macron when he called someone there and they put him out. there it is, what was it? yes, but we've seen it all. he explained everything , and moreover, he explains it, you know how. well, in my opinion, just an idiot and he was ready to understand, he was so insinuatingly intelligible. all this explains explains explains, then chtols, and came and called, and we are 8 years old. they were explained 8 years they showed, and in the end they do, that they talk about what kind of russian barbarians inflicted some, and attacks on civilian objects in cities killed a huge number of people there , they illustrated the attention than the burning crimean bridge or before that they did the same. they

took the illustration from where from donetsk where the killed people in donetsk whom they do not see point-blank, but they illustrate exactly. so here is our supposedly barbaric actions. well, how to talk to them now the conversation, because going through media through the public. wait, well happens they never met macron with putin well six months, probably back. well, yes, but we have a real threat of a third world and nuclear war. well, you should probably meet more than once every 6 months all the time, if you want, an official invitation, the best city, please, let him come. yes , but i don't understand. why shoot about something to talk about now vladimir vladimirovich let's get the result of the question that we had on the site of this. and we formulated the question as follows way. what to expect such you know a tricky question , what to expect from ukraine in the near future? i understand that the first thing that comes to mind is anything. yes, but nonetheless. these

options mean 82% of terrorist attacks and sabotage. 14% new counteroffensive attempt 3% surrender and 1% negotiation here is 1%. here i love. i ca n't take these people with me. well, here we have 90. and 6%. in my opinion, these are the people who do not expect anything good from ukraine. where are you, eugene? what to expect, yes, everything can arise, but only ukraine will not be the subject of negotiations. and that is negotiations. you do too, right? and this will be negotiations again, but not between putin and zelensky, that is, here is the scheme that sergei borisovich spoke about, wait. yes, if anything, she will bring you. there, actually states have been in this world on numerous occasions plus the false flag theory. for some reason, none of those present here

considered the goal of the goal in the united states of america through ukraine to achieve the industrialization of the european union, namely the federal republic of germany here, let's put a comma here, and we'll be back in just a few minutes in this studio. we will continue the conversation with our guests and you will end it so that the stars invest in concrete and walls. please to the person who paid the mortgage. why does tatyana bulanova need another mortgage loan for another 24 years, the same amount for me until retirement. how much did the former tattoo, lena katina, spend on the renovation of the new house ? bought boxes. you didn't build like me from the

foundation pit and who will fix the roof of mitya fomin. they are so busy. that is, everything is impossible in moscow. the stars agreed to find roofers, because repairs are worse than a natural disaster. wanted to hang the door. so we have analyzes. your analyzes are good, but being checked, as you understand, is not cancelled. more than 420 outpatient cancer care centers throughout the country free of charge and close national projects in russia what is important here and now is the program we continue our truth

continue to talk with our guests about the situation around ukraine, yes, about the goals and why ukraine is not a subject ukraine in this case is an object in order to accordingly break the economy of the european union. it was obvious to many, by the way, recently. i had a conversation with an italian acquaintance who, as a businessman, laid it all out. he says guys you don't see the obvious says bubbling. uh, the gas in the baltic sea is a symbol of the destruction of this foundation that you built with the european union for 50 years and the americans have always been against it. accordingly, the outflow of investments from germany from italy well, france is different there, but the flow of brains there, because the german industry is becoming uncompetitive due to very expensive energy resources. now , accordingly, since we had pain points from ukraine for many, many, many years. this is a way

to divert attention there, so that at the same time try to talk russia out, but it really was obvious. that is, you can, but pursue several goals, but the key is the destruction of the economy of the european union, and this is the foundation on which our relations were built, and we remember vladimir putin’s plans from lisbon to vladivostok for a single economic space, which the states did not like plus, but history with, respectively, with goals, what is it barbaric, as michael says barbaric bombardments and so on, but the strikes on well, what good ones were there, what were they? well, i don't know tough, so i said. barbaric , too, i remember, it's just a headline in the time you remember when serbia was bombed. uh, there was some kind of explosion it was written these strikes will drive a series of serbia into the world. there was something like that or they will bring humanitarian to serbia. for the first time in my life, it was the first time in my life that such a formulation of a

humanitarian bombardment. well , whatever you want to call it, the term is a whole operation. the american field staff is readable, as if everything had already been written there. well, here is the macron, who says yes, well, nuclear weapons, sort of, well, sort of no. this is an attempt, of course, to remove a little bit of this hysteria, because they got worried, rather total. this brings us back to the topic of negotiations after these uh mass bombings of uh strategic infrastructure facilities. europe understands perfectly well, and the refugees are in large numbers , and b one movement of the finger and the switch does not work anymore, like people without water, without electricity, without cheap gas. the same waistline of the price for a 100 meter house, the price for electricity is 500 euros for august instead of 100 and uh, 130 for gas instead of 30. this is only august, so we understand perfectly, but returning to this the italians, having revised their policy, have already given there

for another person who will now deal with foreign policy with them. and, of course, they will stop helping ukraine the way they now have this girl who will lead italy, there will be a bright future. that's just i do not know, but the embodiment of the front. of course not. no, i don’t think it will be a front, because ursula vonderlein is practically standing with a syringe with poison saying that we will deal with the topic, hinting at this italian woman who is not with us. 82% terrorist acts of sabotage of 14 attempts do not exclude one another, maybe this way and that and that and that , yeah, that's why ukraine is pursuing its own goals. we are pursuing our own goals, the americans are pursuing their own goals through ours, this conflict with ukraine . and when they are reached, we can assume that, well, as if the song will be sung, and then, probably, the process of negotiations will begin. when it will be. this is a big question. i see it this way, what you said 2 weeks ago directly contradicts what eugene said about

said you said the scariest michael you just perspective everything i say, it's blunt because i didn't like it. that is, every time you write all the time, incomprehensible phrases. the most terrible dream in the economic sense of the americans. this is an economic downturn. e of the european union because the european union as a bloc, it is the largest trading partner of the united states, so the united states is not interested in nord stream two may i was very happy about this, because it's true. this contradicts all the myths, in russia, which i often hear that this is the blue dream of the americans, it is to destroy the european union, i really said so, i also called the numbers the numbers called that 35 trillion american money from american pension funds invested in the european concert companies of the corporation 35 trillion for a second and in securities . it would appear it would seem. well, well, well,

the americans cannot be interested in the european union from an economic point of view, but we live in such an interesting time, mike, when vladimir vladimirovich didn’t let me lie germany was the benefit of the acquirer rose economically developed the tank, the structure of the car, the structure and some other structure there, and so on and so forth. why because she had? opportunities for access to cheap russian gas, then they suddenly decided, sitting on this own branch, to cut this branch. who did it? neither biden nor macron made god with their own hands. i'm just saying, we live in such an interesting time on this, when when everyone goes crazy in their own way, and therefore i already admit the very option that the americans really now, and let down the economy of europe, it will go bankrupt. although, although it seemed that the americans should not be interested in this. and

it is absolutely unprofitable. yes, vladimir vladimirovich , who did it? it's easy to remind you that the acting head of the cia is green. this is exactly the person who openly began to blackmail german business into sending out a threat letter. that's how it all started. he was the last random plenipotentiary of the usa. remember, and he sent out how they sent out, and this he sat taking notes, what companies were there? yes? no, a special team arrived there. your guys in these white shirts in ties, who clearly figured out who is the director, where does he live? what accounts where is his wife? where his children study, they came or said, so you want to work with russians. look, you're in trouble, you're in trouble. you understand who we are, you are gone, you came to the european world with one goal to destroy. not just a checkmate from lisbon to vladivostok , you will definitely launch the marshall plan and help pointwise. here belgium is here

you are the masters of germany here in italy, you have succeeded great. you guys are really doing well, but it's not yet, yet. i want to agree that he knows what will be tomorrow with a phrase, and everything works out for you. it turns out, really the korean crisis is you alone at night. that's when you crap, that's right you, when you feel your fear in the congressional elections, when the missiles are in cuba , the white swan will fly somewhere submarines will surface. when there will be 600 miles from your shores, the teachings of the nuclear triad are double or even something, when your first satellites begin to fall to the ground, then you will ask for mercy and then you will be destructive of your foreign policy. and before that, you feel like gods and unfortunately, you don’t give us the right to negotiate, because you are forcing us against each other, you did everything perfectly, therefore, i personally can’t wait, the devastated europe will never protest there. chaos will be in paris in berlin. no, it won't work . you won't care about europe. you'll be glad

that there is something to eat? you're the only one when the nuclear weapons will be, here are 600 miles, not declared against you just work out. i'll watch you pay and get on your knees and immediately there will be peace. here we are returning to the theme of fear and this very fear will immediately appear. i can answer. yes , please, first, michael why russia does not . and here i am this question of yours for the past eight years. when we talked about the fact that ukraine could begin at any moment and russia would intervene, you said it many times. why don't you do it when will do moreover, he still argued to us explained why we had to start already. yesterday you remember, this is when it all started, it turned out to be horror horror for everyone horror for you too, because you apparently expected everything differently. and what is happening with europe, i will just say my opinion, the whole problem of germany was that in building a united europe, she sacrificed

her video as a real leader. she began to create a european bureaucracy, which, in fact , is educated around everything. she was absolutely over national economy, it descended on european soil, where such national economies were very carefully cultivated and grown a lot, slowly growing together. she eventually sank like an american and fell asleep the foundation, which, so to speak, is a former gynecologist. it just became the whole of europe now would be dancing to the americans' puffs. services and professional activities and accordingly, in this case, you need to understand that, of course, now is the time for europe. uh, you know such a half-life half-life and uh to the question of fear. what is the danger of michael i to you too i answer. what is the danger of the danger that all current policies? i'm not talking about generals. i say, all of the current politics, they really do not really understand what is the mechanism for the development of nuclear war. you know, they believe that this thing, in which you can intervene at any moment, even at the level of how they intervened in the

caribbean crisis, there were phones , they talked, they decided then there were those missiles and those ranges that the watch gave in reserve. understand the hours before it all began, after shot down, two over cuba had several hours to make a decision with the american president today, and if a reaction begins, in which nuclear missile forces are included on both sides, they are no longer possible. stop the green moment. here, even if you want, the president will pick up the phone and say. well, well , but since you have a signal in front of you that the covers have been removed there and there is a countdown to the launch of the rockets. you will never believe anyway. the problem is that this game is weak, which is now coming from the side. you know it's called in the west. uh, playing russian roulette with a gun, you know? not because we are russians. but he simply says that this is a game of roulette with a different attitude to strength, and dmitry medvedev. but he wrote exactly about this, in fact. yes, he

says, you say that in case the russians suddenly use some kind of tactical nuclear weapon, we will respond with no, not with nuclear weapons. we will strike at russia with some kind of weapon, so russia says further, says, we continue this chain of scattering will immediately inflict an answer on your all these cities and countries with nuclear weapons. and this will end. everything is fine. here i will explain. uh, russia will not. and i would like to reassure everyone. russia will not use tactical nuclear weapons. firstly, we have indeed taken upon ourselves the obligation not to use tactical nuclear weapons at all against countries that do not have them. we will fulfill these obligations, but it makes no sense for us to use tactical weapons in ukraine in this case, because not there for that purpose. for this, our usual conventional weapons are enough. but just to break into a nuclear missile war at the pace that we are moving towards it. we have every chance. and this will concern, not ukraine. and this will concern the united states and europe, you understand? this is the

whole problem, ukraine does not hit the kuleb on the brakes. here i talked to the pranksters, and openly and said that everything that explodes, all these sabotage attacks there, it's all of us there. yes, we have. let's yeah, let's put it on. is not the nearest operational target, but if, for example, you ask me who blows up something in crimea or belgorod, but in private in private communication, how private can it be in zoom. i'll tell you that yes, it's us, yeah. there was also a small continuation, but this is not for the air, but. you don’t hide it, he thinks that he is talking to this same smartphone by the former ambassador. yes, he thinks that he is talking to him, so he speaks openly, but what he did in kazakhstan today, let's listen. most

likely, this so-called cargo, to be more precise. e explosives explosives were sent by sea from odessa but it is not exactly established. uh, is this done with grain trucks or not? this is a question of answering it not yet, but if the humanitarian corridors for the supply of grain to the poorest countries although it does not go there. well, under this pretext was organized. this work on it turns out that humanitarian corridors are used to commit terrorist acts, then, of course, this is a big question. uh, further functioning of this corridor. this is for grain now a second sergeevich is for a grain deal for one day only one day. so we fsb detained three three terrorists, ukrainian intelligence officers who were going to carry

out some terrorist acts here. and most importantly - one alone. i liked it through the estonian border in a car cache i spent two and the igla complex . i have a question. in connection with this, well, complexes are the head. we understand why portable anti-aircraft missile systems are needed. they are in the first place, why in order for helicopters to be airplanes? here he was taken to the suburbs in the suburbs, i wonder . and what kind of helicopters could he destroy in the moscow region and the first thing that comes to my mind? you have all seen these endless cars, where boys and girls come there in the sheremetyevo area and watch the romantic, yes, romance, how airplanes land, civil planes take off in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bany airport. that is, here, please, two or two manpads in the cache of the car. i have a question. how is it in general, in principle, it is possible to bring here two

manpads question number two, that is, we clearly understand that anything can be expected from these people, maybe it already makes sense sergey here or let's no let's, okay, okay sergey maybe it makes sense already more tough tough somehow now to strike at ukraine to change targets, which i spoke about at the very beginning. no need to touch the energy objects. yes, let's get there, i don't know any others, because it's impossible to stop these guys. that is, the blows that we inflicted do not stop them. it's all already after our strikes for one day. and most importantly, it is difficult here to determine where the limit is, where is the boundary of this rigidity of rigidity, as far as you understand, with what kind of non-existent instrument to measure all this. and here is the question. in fact, it rests on but this, as it were, insoluble dispute, which is not only here, but everywhere we go

in all studios, in general, in all media are needed. negotiations do not need negotiations. what negotiations with whom negotiations? where are the negotiations, when are the negotiations will you get around? yes, with whom yes, look, and kuleba is the minister of foreign affairs. so he says, yes, this is us and we will continue to continue in this very one. here is a conversation, there is the minister of foreign affairs with the pranksters. here his position is clear, behind the crimean bridge stands on the sbu is also understandable. here they are these guys them here. here are these manpads and the rest there are two terrorists who were detained by our fsb. this is the main intelligence department. this is also sudak, that is, here they have absolutely absolutely. they are all in a bunch, that is, there are no people who would keep would, there, i do not know in doubt the course, let's say politicians. or someone there, i don't know, would try to somehow stop the politicians. there, these very military or intelligence officers are nothing of this.

no. they are calm about the production of sabotage on our territory by terrorist authors. you know, i will continue a little forgotten here, er, a quote from our president, who, well, at the beginning of his term in office, but announced no negotiations. do you remember that was his phrase? yes, now ukraine is behaving like a terrorist state. yes, then the question arises, and how can negotiations with terrorists go on, then, in order for negotiations to begin, but something must happen to the terrorists, they must cease to exist or cease to be a terrorist. yes? but the most terrible thing is not even that. and what , in addition to these terrorist attacks, in general, is a generative system put in place. and the question is, what does zelensky say as long as there is power in russia? that 's power. this president is not at all, and there can be no negotiations, what does this mean, then yes, you and i must completely

reformat here, so that zelensky deigns to negotiate with us those who are involved. that is, that is, some shocks must take place here. so she's told maybe it's time to reformat them. yes and look, look here in this situation. no need to argue about when and where and what you need to understand one fundamental thing. why are these negotiations impossible now, because there are two irreconcilable strategies, a and in each strategy there is an inner core, there is our strategy, which was stated at the beginning of the special operation. uh, the de-demilitarization of genocification and so on is well known to us. there is a strategy, and ukraine and the collective west defeat russia, and it also has its own inner core. if you now get into, so to speak, the ukrainian telegram channel and the media and listen to what they say in the audience in the studios. you may be surprised, or maybe not, but you will see that they say

that we are ukrainians one step away from victory yes , they say that we are a step away from victory a little more it’s completely left for us to do so, why should they negotiate if they believe that they are one step away from victory sergey what conclusion from this and the conclusion from this is the following in order to be possible? so you need to remove the inner rod. you see, for us, from this whole structure , that's exactly what i'm asking you about. just in other words, so that it collapses this entire structure of the collective direct ukraine plus. west, as soon as you are in the instructions, just like a person has, his backbone breaks ridge. that's it, is he immobilized or do you understand the machine? she jammed behind the engine engine. they cannot move. here, as soon as this structure ceases to exist, everything will fall apart. that's when negotiations will be possible, because there are no eternal wars , you understand, yes, any war ends with a question, when at some point this is the point. yes , look, so there is no need to talk about when and

where it should break down, this whole structure determines the shift mode, but in russia, you understand when it becomes clear that it is useless to implement this strategy. somehow i'm talking about plan b here. you see, here's the plan no. that's just ahead, only the defeat of putin, only the infliction of irreparable damage, but this does not work, of course, as there can be no talk of any negotiations here, but the situation is on the battlefield. it will change, we understand it, yes, we understand it, and ukraine believes that it will win. we are convinced otherwise. well, as soon as she changes. and as soon as it becomes clear that one of strategies do not work completely. it's broken. well, then there will already be a subject for this huge gap that exists now and makes negotiations impossible, so that it is eliminated, and then it will really be possible to talk about something. well, just categorical

negotiations. actually needed. now i will say. shut up need need, immediately and possible and talks about e with urgent measures to prevent a critical escalation. i'm under this world war. and as part of the five e states permanent members of the un security council plus germany, here are the six states should come together and immediately agree. how to avoid at least a third world war. why not? guys , here there are no more arguments to give about immediately collecting. you know why, probably not for this, because these same countries can’t do anything, they still can’t at least tell the ukrainians not to touch the kursk nuclear power plant, the zaporozhye nuclear power plant. so here are the northern streams. they, on the contrary, they support and inspire

and guide and also correct, you understand what that’s why no sergeevich, we will now turn around, we will return to this story, literally in a few minutes and you will answer sergey yes, you will return in a few minutes and continue the conversation. a family of dangerous terrorists with ukraine, the father of a militant who hates russians and now you are still offended that they loved you to the tree, would swipe you with a knife, the eldest son of a murderer from zelensky’s entourage, washed in the blood of our good people weak joker and daughter olesya, who they managed to neutralize. terrorists in the service of zelensky i repeat once again, those who understand only russian on

sunday at 6:00 pm on ntv to repel the enemy with the power of their cultural weapons, with such an appeal already on june 23, 1941. the trade union of art workers turned to singers, musicians, dancers and actors, russian writers, and russian front-line culture, while a special military operation is underway. in the field of culture, mild schizophrenia continues, the vast majority of stars, as it were, are absent. do i need to send a request for their return of course not. it's time to build a beautiful city ourselves in the vacant wasteland of show business zakhar prilepin russian lessons tomorrow immediately after his truth on this. this program is true, we continue to talk with our guests, and we listen to the situation around ukraine. yes, but i'll

put the question a little differently. i agree with you that negotiations are needed and immediate. well , you, as an expert, do you think that it is possible to really start negotiations immediately when provided that the west does not abandon this maximalist strategy of russia's withdrawal from ukraine and the departure of president putin, can this be married? is there at least one chance that if this approach continues, negotiations will begin immediately? how do you say even one step? what are their approaches? this is what needs to be clarified without television cameras in the course of these negotiations, that this is not clear. this does not need to be explained not on a tv show, it is necessary to find out, but in the course of negotiations. that's because you have questions. what questions? what do you want? you personally do not understand. let me try you. is that what you doubt? what are their actual nuances you do not know their position. i don't know much about

their position. well, for example, how they relate to the issue. about the future existence of the state of russia and the state of ukraine as they see the future existence has long meant, of course. i don't parties so they don't portray themselves. let's get everything back within the boundaries of the ninety-first year, you understand, because they will say this on the podium, but there without a television camera. they will say something else. i am i think that you will not say to react to react. yes? uh, so let's clarify, what is immediately answer. what is the subject of war for the west, uh, no one expects some distant military advances of ukraine and, moreover, no one expects her to take moscow but the main thing is expected from her is non-stop wars, which even now designate her main goal here to return russia to the situation of the ninety-first year, that is, for them

the goal is not to defeat the military, because it is impossible, but just a challenge to the political economic crisis, which should end with what ended the ninety-first year for the soviet union, this is the main main military-strategic goal, as long as they bring them together , hope that they will achieve it. they will help to participate whatever you want and that means prolonging the war without negotiations. we help them achieve this and the main goal brilliantly. thanks, the problem lies elsewhere. that's why let's renew and renew you are told no, i'm done. everyone says negotiations - it's good. always better than war. sergey well , they just don't conduct negotiations, they don't want to negotiate. that is, they are not even ready to compromise. so, we will work on your plan, which you just outlined, you are proposing that we stop, actually take

a big big table, there, i don’t know, on the one hand. let him carry it. putin on the other side shoigu on this side medvedev on the other side. there, i don’t know, volodin take out this table somewhere there, put a gray area to sit down and say we and also laurel, of course, you need to take with you. we are ready to start negotiations. it 's great, with whom i can finish collecting a big five-rubber. i finished you i was interrupted this is not very correct. yes, finish it, then i repeat. i told you what the americans and their allies want. now, what is our answer, our answer is to wage war to such a state that the political military-economic existence of ukraine is so threatened. what in order to save you need to sit down urgently negotiate with russia this is our military-political goal, that is, negotiations. later, not now, there are no negotiations when it will be beneficial to us and when the military machine of ukraine will be defeated then yes until this

moment by the whole country, what is called straining? but they say that we are open at any moment, so this will be the very moment when it becomes clear to the west that either they are trying to save ukraine through immediate negotiations, or after some time from ukraine in general there will be horns to the legs. then there will be time for negotiations and a real conversation. but how long is the peer review. how long will it take? e until the moment when we are at this turn, that's just indicated to you. what time is the year two three five? how much sergey boris is, probably, this question is not for vladislav, the very moment when sergey borisovich finally gives him a listen to me, please. at the very moment when the supreme commander gets tired of giving a chance to that side. then, perhaps, the situation will change. look, it means that he says that they do not stop and

are even going to nuclear terrorism. there , from time to time, they wanted to arrange something at the zaporizhzhya station, they wanted to commit a terrorist act in the area of ​​​​the kursk station there, and the northern streams blew up, which means, and about the northern streams hmm, he said, so that there is no doubt this is international terrorism, the purpose of which is to undermine the energy security of the whole continent. now listen to zelensky what to say zelensky about moreover, the gas pipeline that goes through ukraine well, let's see. they will blow up something they don't care at all. and this is their style. they will blow up something and accuse us in order to hit our gas transportation system, because in this case they will say, we simply reacted. after that, he will tell europe that you are looking, well, there is no way. we urgently need to launch nord stream 2. you are germans. you must

give us this opportunity because you must lobby for the sanctions to be lifted. why europe will be left without gas because of ukraine here i am, when i listen, i understand what they will do next. as they say step is exactly. that's what he said, he'll do it. they can blow up their own gas pipeline at any moment and say that they did it. we roman that freeze the fuck germany already, to germany quickly nord stream. he says that first there must be a terrorist attack in russia, that is, they will first try to ukraine. they will blow it up themselves, he says. they will blow it up themselves, they will say that they did it. we did it we yes and they they will blow up their gas transportation system and say that everything that happened was done by russia, but they will add explosions at nord stream 1, nord stream 2 there, and they will say, but in general, all the evil in the world from time immemorial, it is all from russia vladimir yes. let's, let's take a look, it means

that i have seen a map of the strikes that we inflicted on the territory of ukraine on these energy facilities. let's show. yes, please, the cities are there. almost the entire territory. yes, but the substations were beaten. e kyiv uh, yes no dnepropetrovsk krivoy rog odessa there and so on and so forth there were video cameras, but they yes, please, yes, but they don't stop. they do not stop them sergeevich do you think, perhaps, after all, this kind of thing, as experts say? yes, this kind of attack, let's say massive attacks should be regular , practically systemic. they are there once every six months in order to demonstrate something to someone, and then and then experts say the situation will change. well you heard yeah things are about to change, and then there will be a desire to negotiate. well

, i'm not a military expert, so i advise the general staff. how to fight. i will not immediately say that we have amateurs to advise the general staff. where to strike, how to enter from the right, how to enter from the left, there is more than enough telegram channel. open this, that, yes, all the experts how to fight, only the generals do not know how. we have already learned this. so. i understand military affairs worse than generals. i say right away, but here you need to take into account something else, in my opinion, here you need to take into account that ukraine is nothing more than a tool. here, i completely agree that ukraine is intended only for one thing in order to inflict as much damage on us once and twice, to provoke chaos aside, like the ninety- first year and the dismemberment of russia, and so on and so forth, but here further the next question arises. if we are this tool, now how do the same military experts grind down?

will the dangers disappear for us and will there be a possibility of negotiations that will lead to peace? here i am just a big pessimist. why because the west, uh, is going to inflict a strategic defeat on us, not because , uh, the villains, they gathered there, uh, they can’t live, just let them destroy russia, the president told us several times. let's believe, nevertheless, the president, what is the stake in this struggle, the stake in this struggle is the preservation of the five-century hegemony of the west and, accordingly, the rent of the behemons, which they gather around the world only by destroying russia, the only country that is militarily . can resist the west. they are provide themselves after russia destroyed no one in the world will peep. there it will be possible to enter any prices for energy resources for any resources, and everyone will gladly run to give. accordingly,

this can be stopped not by eliminating the tool, but by creating a threat. here, i agree here. absolutely, when it was said here about fear fear yes, but what kind of fear wait in the caribbean crisis, then there was fear, we really organized the caribbean crisis in response to their deployment of missiles near our territory created an equal threat to them. they have there was panic. world war iii, they first felt themselves in danger. now we need to repeat the caribbean crisis, but not in a mirror image, because we will spend the sarmatians or something else there. uh, teaching next to their shores. it does not act on this fear in life then this fear. they no longer have. because they are well aware that we are not crazy and will not unleash a third world war in the same way

as we understand that they will not shoot at us with mimicry and trading now. you know that the answer will be, accordingly, we need now to create a danger for the united states , namely the united states of europe how it should look, but this is a question for politicians , if i knew the buyback, i would live in sochi but aha i emphasize until the united states is in the position we are in now when we are forced to fight. when we are forced to waste resources, and when our people are dying, this is the situation we should now find ourselves in, the united states is one of ways is to pump up all the enemies in the united states with weapons so that american military bases abroad begin to explode. we didn't hit them. and when someone says, if somewhere the base explodes with our weapons, they will start the third world war. sorry, when they fire american weapons, belgorod, we do not start

the third world game. this is a game you know for a long time this is a game, and the questions need to be addressed right now. and you know, and this needs to be understood, because everyone loves a stick like a dog. yes incentive sit down at the negotiating table for the united states now is not, they are in chocolate in full they have no losses europe bears the damage. yes, we are hurting. nobody takes ukraine into account at all. and the united states only profits until they are in danger. they won't negotiate. it's clear let's say so to nikolai's remarks then evgenia yes, there is plenty of chocolate. it's just unhealthy. and it could end badly. if once again i say that i almost read carefully what putin says because he says he will used to protect any mechanisms, and he does not say that with the exception of nuclear weapons. if

everyone finally understands that this is a real threat and this is the basis for those negotiations that are possible, about which you are just talking about, it is possible for these negotiations. this discussion is not about the distribution of weapons. and how can the borders in the world change, there are a huge number of unresolved issues, and recently he clearly said 2 days ago that putin is a sane politician, and he absolutely does not believe that putin can apply nuclear weapons from our side, for sure, everyone is also sure that there are sane politicians there. i wouldn't be anyone i'm a serious statement. we are, as they say. yes, what will happen? unfortunately man. can see what's up? yes, they are on a statement with a canoe, briefly, yes, friends, because the logic of the united states of america is the logic of the islanders, the mess is all happening in eurasia and we won’t deliver us far from our side, we won’t take two oceans. small dionysus

big dionysus yes, there are close islands here but if you look at the border of russia and the distance between russia, the states are another matter. i think that the problems are still the next people who resolved the cuban missile crisis. people understood this very well, they were not going to flirt with each other. these are two normal people, adequate people. yes, they remembered the catastrophic consequences of the second world war and understood what was the value of what was happening and they agreed for 30 years, for 30 years the russian federation tried. well, roughly speaking, some eats let's say so in basically to play. please accept us here, what do you need to give away for the nuclear zone, but excuse me, we will leave it, what else do you need to destroy the industry? well, ok here it worked out, but not like at the moment when the logic is finally, and the thought will strengthen, the following is that in this case these are our strategic opponents now, but not before the war, but because how to live on, then perhaps there will be

words, and shishkin has just explained to us and them why the americans left afghanistan because the logic is to support the enemies of my enemy. now would led to the fact that russia would support the taliban, who are fighting the americans and the americans left, so that the taliban would not have man-portable anti-aircraft missile systems, so that american planes would not fall, and not leave in advance and let's say, well, we fairly perceived this departure then, as their public weakness. i think it's time to reevaluate. it was a military trick in preparation for the kiev regime to unleash a war on the territory of the donbass of crimea and all of ukraine briefly, please, i would suggested, then, peace talks with what needs to move the dollar. this is very hard to do. but, if we say europe has agreed to a joint fund, the restoration of the entire european economy. i mean in a geographical context. here

is the lisbon of vladivostok then, thus, the dollar would have to move. and maybe here is really the root of evil in the dollar. as a currency, as in the management system of buying up the entire planet. and so far i see no progress. that is, we talk about the war all the time, no one talks about the fact that after the war it is necessary to restore the economy of the same europe, and if we continue to say, well, our doors are openly open, for which only the neutral status of ukraine is only cybersecurity. just to prevent ukrainians from engaging in terrorism on the territory of russia, it is too little to enter a little there for 5-10 years ahead and see what we can do there. and here, here, try to buy, by the way, this is a happy future in which we don’t shoot and this is an economic component, it is very important, because evgeny from europe is simply in insolent top-managers transportation of capital throw shop. now europe is in a local position. and it needs to be played. i think let's listen to the president's statement on mobilization. this is a very important statement. let's listen. now to form

222,000 people mobilized. out of three hundred thousand. uh, i think that within, well, within about two weeks, all mobilization activities will be completed. and another 2 weeks of mobilization activities will be completed, but you know, what question. here is vladislav. perhaps you should answer this for me. here i am watching this whole process and i see that somewhere there they didn’t work out in the military registration and enlistment offices, somewhere there are agendas. there, just like that, as they say, they sowed with these trips, from left to right, everything is clear, then others joined in, as they say, institutions in order to correct all these roughnesses smooth out all these corners, but i am now observing a different story, no one take now any industry. here you take any there, i do not know the profession all apply for deferrals. and we already got ahead of schedule. well, listen, tourists get into it people get into a book, publishers get into it. tomorrow there

will be someone else, someone else, someone there teachers. now there is a queue and so on. they will turn out in the summer. so we actually have this mobilization resource that shoigu spoke about at the very beginning of 25 million people. at this rate, we will simply reduce to zero, where this one will be mo. he's a resource of 25 million. if everyone goes, uh, everyone goes through these delays. there is such a danger. well, i think that rather there are some threat of danger no, uh danger. no why, because as the conscripts are adjusted. uh, as if the groups of the draft contingent will be adjusted, of course, and deferrals. and if now we can afford it, as you say, there are delays for tourists for it people for even a whole group of people, then if a decision is made to increase it, while it is not there, in this case it will not work. yes, in this case, let's say you can understand that the last postponements, which no one will change. it will. well, what is called a

life support system. vc is clear. this is as always, and everywhere with any owner. it's clear so far. we can afford it, because even with these delays 300.000. we got it very quickly. at the same time, the flow of volunteers continues, which is very important. despite the fact that a lot have already been taken. there is still a stream of volunteers and me. i think that we can do without this for now. thank you all for what i want to say. here you reassured me, because i observe this process and i understand that this is the second extreme. this is the second extreme. here is the most incomprehensible one, and at the start, work there in the military registration and enlistment offices, and some other structures there, when give me a reprieve, give me a respite. and we are also a strategic story. and give us a delay and in the end it will turn out that there is absolutely no one to call, and this is the wrong story in the current situation. but you reassured me what i want to say. this is the most mobilization. and this is so that we are really now on the line of combat contact. in fact, on the field battles turned this situation around. but, and now we are

seeing a statement, in my opinion, an alarming statement. there, the head of the kherson region that they are asking people there to be evacuated from the kherson region and already some actual versions there, as they say, do not sound up to the point that we are now evacuating. people and we will use nuclear weapons exactly in these very territories. i am sure that this will not happen, but i am convinced that we need to change. changing the approach directly and limiting ourselves to these infrastructure objects is not enough this is not enough you need to persuade, the ridge, as one of our experts, in my opinion, sergey, and then we will be surprised to find that exactly a minute after we broke their back, they became so accommodating and ready for any negotiations on any conditions, and even without any preconditions at all, with regard to the terrorist acts that they are going to carry out on our territory. i return to these three, and cases only for one day. i don't understand at all why? well you can imagine

to imagine, for example, a car with a russian license plate on the street of any ukrainian city is impossible, but we have a second. they drive calmly, cars with kiev numbers, and the designation of these cars is just a huge amount. why do we allow these people with cars to enter our territory so that they can import man-portable air defense systems so that they can then shoot down our civilian planes. why are we doing this? i am convinced that it is necessary to tighten the procedure for allowing people to cross our border, two out of three cases this is an estonian checkpoint on the border with estonia for all borders. it is necessary to strictly monitor who crosses the border, especially if they are citizens of ukraine . well, i don't know this should be done by a professional. but this is absolutely absolutely. and exactly what needs to be done. otherwise, otherwise, god forbid, we are with you as they say, we will teach situations when the fsb cannot stop someone in time.

see you in exactly one week at the studio. remember that all participants in our program have their own truth, but we will always get to the bottom of the truth. fight back the enemy with the power of your cultural weapons with such a call already on june 23, 1941. the trade union of art workers turned to singers and musicians as a dancer and actor together with the red army. artists, in fact, went through the whole war. you can imagine iosif kobzon with suitcases on the border with mongolia, and i can't. no , it's not that the guys will not do their job without songs and without this other thing . where he was, even if by their misfortune.

while there is a special military operation. while our the guys continue to go to the front, i will show and the mothers are desperately waiting and praying in the country in the field of culture , mild schizophrenia continues loudly from russia . here, even without quotes, the most popular are the most famous, defining the cultural agenda of the individual, which, according to the boors, maxim galkina andrey zvyagintsev is the producer of a huge number of films and tv shows alexander rodnyansky. and also those whom the youth today is equal to yuri dud mimiron markin stern zemfira bloggers transverse madison hasanov