people who were removed from youtube at the request of the uk secretary of defense on demand, that is , the uk secretary of defense for homeland security became a letter to youtube with his signature. there, even in this letter, he drew youtube and indicated that with the rest of the distributors of information. we agreed. we hope you will be prudent. here is a simple example of what they want to do there we did nothing. those were his words. we didn't spoil them. let's see what happens in general, in principle on youtube what various invasions of privacy are going on there. what kind of videos are there, which, let's say, where secret data is disclosed, which also threatens russia's national security, nothing is deleted. let's have some conversation. so to put it mildly, an idiot who spills secrets on his own in a car. they

decided to delete. well, well, we'll quickly say. that's how they reacted. we moved the entire archive to the domestic rutube hosting and is now stored there, uh, you read the comments. uh, uh, on the site i have vkontakte here. yes, they just offer to reward you there. as soon as possible, we have been offered for many years to reward everyone, in my opinion, who is not too lazy to go there, until no one has implemented this invitation. we do for us. exactly this. the main thing is that the same comments contain calls to you or the lexus. play keanu reeves. sean erdogan. pugachev was erdogan. yes, but it happens, yes they do. we read. we even if the opinion of these

people match with ours, then, why not. if there is a request, then there are suggestions. i mean, it was relevant. yep, that's what it is. that's what is called long-term. uh, no planning. yes , there is no foam there. no, of course there is no such thing. we also need to say here that people, and so far , how many interviews we have given, how much we have said, people believe that somewhere, almost out of thin air, we take a phone number, we call in any business and at night. well, on the other side, of course, immediately yes, yes, yes, yes. let's discuss this now. let's not. this is very difficult and long work. even here uh hmm choose who to call for? this is also a very big difficulty. the same macron prank in 2018. it really took us 2 years to find this dot. the story with the macron was interesting, because at that time

zelensky was just being elected. he met with the macron while still a candidate and we realized for ourselves that, well, we had a macron number that he would never take, but let's explain where the macron number came from, because they gave him the macron number, the fsb officer or somewhere else the macron was a member of the french parliament, his mobile was practically in the public domain. find contacts of deputies to the state duma for journalists, but let's say federal media - this is not a problem, yes, but calling a deputy is the majority, probably there are 90% who have public macrons. in france, it was a public person, and you could talk to him , but how did we not try there? it is clear when, despite the fact that the president is on whatsapp, he has a whitelist there. that is he does not let any calls from uh, unknown numbers like that, that is, it was practically impossible and let's say even if you have a direct mobile phone in most cases , well, how would it be so easy calling is

almost impossible. it's best to call. coordinate everything through the offices with advisers. by external relations through the environment. it's much more reliable. but with the macron there was, so to speak, an exception, so we wrote from zelensky because we realized that zelensky did not have such official relations with the palace and simply understood that now we would write a message to him. thanks for the meeting. well, it’s logical yes, because zelensky met with him and macron, i thought. well , where is the mobile phone from? maybe i left him so casually in the ambassador gave the ambassador. maybe someone gave, yes, and we knew that now he should answer. now. we got there, just at the time when he can believe it, and we just waited for a day, he needed some kind of answer. thanks , it was a pleasure talking to you too. and here with at this point, we realized that contact had been made. then it is ours, uh, but now we have uh, the whole country is

actively moving along the path of import substitution. well, in this sense, vovan is fine, but lexus, yes, that is, as it were, it seems not very patriotic. you know, there is a parallel import, as they say, but maybe vovan and aurus are there. yes, there, well, at the crossing there they don’t change their pseudonyms. unfortunately. at least, i can say that here i dress only in clothes of russian manufacturers, and what to ride the subway? that's it, that's it, you guess that you will be engaged in political prank all your conscious conscious life, or someday the time will come, what is called tying up, or maybe this time is still very far away. we didn't originally plan to do political prank at all, because it was more like some kind of joke entertainment and hmm when it all started. well, at all there were no uh, thoughts, even, well, such a foresight into what could it

result in? how do you say this is a joke? went too far, we'll see. here, well at least some common common path. maybe there is something, uh, the society has a request for this information that we , uh, supply to it. i think that we will deal with this, and then we'll wait and see and yes, really the most important thing is to be flexible in this complex world and do what society needs, guys. thank you very much for the conversation. thanks on the field in the newspapers they will write only tomorrow the debriefing will be tomorrow conversations at the cooler. now

bet play now rest hello next 10 years. i am vladimir antokhin. i'm ekaterina or there are no judges. still volodya judges. let's make a deal right now. well , if suddenly we get confused, then it's okay to ask, in general, well, i invited wholesalers who i think that in 10 years, but really, at least judges will be canceled. these are dmitry sytnik , an expert in artificial intelligence and digitalization good evening, and konstantin shurunov, an expert in the field of information security.

hello, good evening. traditionally, my guests are skeptics leonid kaloshin an expert in the field of refereeing and football competitions, for example, yuriy boykovsky is an expert in sports psychology. good evening. at the end of the program of our guests, optimists will make a forecast. what is the probability that in 10 years science will cancel sports referees about the history of refereeing, our expert professor kapustin will tell in many sports there were no judges at all for a very long time. it's just that the players themselves agreed on the duration and sent their games. well, the controversial moment was decided jointly. to be honest, i even remember that when we played football at school. we just agreed, we play up to three goals and amateur sports by mutual agreement have been preserved in our time. but competitions for prizes and awards have turned into professional sports, and in order to avoid scuffles in controversial moments, judges appeared, they zherefili

orbits, but judges are never impartial. well, they are people and refereeing problems arose even before the ancient olympic games, violations were punished, both financially and physically. well crooks. just publicly sometimes rome greece judges were usually kings of tyrants, but modern judging begins at the end of the 19th century, when a referee armed with a whistle entered the football field. armed with a whistle, but i have a personal question for you. here you have a child who is engaged in figure skating, and you always agree with the marks that the judges themselves give at competitions. yes, but i, as a mother of a professional athlete, but i think that not an athlete, not a mother should not interfere in sports refereeing, and therefore i agree or disagree. it

doesn't matter at all. and by the way, you agree. you are in boxing. but when you are judged very simply yes fell, it means that yes dmitry alexandrovich lost, and sports judges appeared simultaneously with sports. right away. as far as i understand, almost simultaneously and quite well. we already know this from ancient greek. uh on history related to the olympiads. yes, the paralympic games. there it has already directly acquired the form of an institution. that is, they had very powerful rights as judges. they had assistants who, in fact , were practically how the police could remove athletes there. the judge had his own apparatus. they had they had purple cloaks. they had the best seats in the stadium and, accordingly, they determined the correctness of the introduction of the competition. and who won one way or another, but even then, even then, despite the fact that, perhaps, one

might think that then everything was honest and everything was transparent. it wasn't quite there so the judges were also incompletely possessed. there was a sidekick’s advice that could challenge their decision if something was completely wrong and there were cases when athletes were punished and judges were punished for colluding with them, because it was very honorable for the time of the olympics, wars were stopped and the answer that won. he, in fact, until the end of his life received, but not explicitly, as if the pension of his region of greece, so to speak, and all that. and therefore, if you fight, if such cases surfaced, then you will be guilty if you had to put a statue of zeus cast in bronze and on one of the statues there was an inscription that help, that is? prove the strength of your e muscles, and not with money, that you really deserve victory, then they tried to prove something with money, and lenina sergeevich in general, the appearance of sports judges somehow influenced the realization of sports,

or it doesn’t matter at all. no, it did not, but the fact is that the appearance of the judges itself goes without saying. and it’s like, uh, well, the evolution of sports, that is, we are talking about justice. who is able to bring this justice to life should be a special person or a special group of people who, uh, have the necessary knowledge, authority and trust from the participants in sports competitions , but we understand that in itself the evolution of sports. she is consists of several parts of very important mechanisms, yes, and fair refereeing, uh, based on regulations, based on rules and based on common sense as well, this is really what people wanted them to see. they

want to see now, so uh, once again there are sports that are subjective there are sports that are, uh, which are, well, let's say, so objectively subjective. these are mostly playing sports. although there are, for example, such individual, but sports. how is it, for example, artistic gymnastics, artistic gymnastics, where there is conventionally ski jumping. yes, this is where, too, well , after all, the level of subjectivity rolls over whether this is a good or bad rhetorical question, because it must be perceived. as a given, it is clear that people now in the 21st century are trying, uh, to minimize this human. eh, the component here, but again, you know how to try, but the question is, er, the main one. is it possible to achieve this, so i think. i think

that is the topic that we are touching on today. it is quite relevant and process of various blocks. yes, we, respectively, then we will come to a conclusion. what can be done? can we replace humans with robots? or is it allowed? uh deal, yeah deal. eh, what is some very, very distant future? well, we will discuss this more, but after the advertisement we will go on a time-out advertisement on ntv do not miss the events and people of the week on central television. moscow accuses kiev of intending to use a dirty bomb. is the ukrainian crisis already one step away from the nuclear level of escalation, what is this dirty bomb, and why its explosion can be many times more dangerous than the use of real nuclear weapons the establishment of the democratic party calls on the

baytan to sit down at the negotiating table with moscow and the republicans. in the event of their victory in the elections, they are going to cut military financial assistance, and is washington really tired of the ukrainian crisis? in britain, the new prime minister for how long and why did boris johnson refuse to take the helm? is it really good for the former captain of the ship called great britain? it is known that the wind of history carries this ship straight to the rocks. this will be your central television on saturday at 19:00 on ntv on ntv air the final of the international vocal show you are a super incredible final of the sixth season