it is sometimes claimed that in russia they themselves do not know what they are building. what kind of ideology we do not know what kind of system is not true until recently. here they knew very firmly that they wanted to build our authorities sincerely wanted to build a civilized world, european values, and all that. they were serious about what the market was. if not everything, then a lot of the main decides no, western saber-toothed companies. they squeezed the oligarchs from the throne a little bit far from the domestic market and not completely, but in the field of culture in the field of media in the field of show business the authorities decided otherwise, but that's all there, let the market decide

. so they decided about culture. we will talk about economics below. the case went, by the way, more or less successfully. we have a country that, to hide, was getting rich slowly, along with the country , some part was getting rich. society oh, not all, but a fairly serious part of society - a quarter of the population lived very decently for another quarter, more or less. tolerably another quarter hoped for the best let's say. so a quarter. yes, she lived below the poverty line. but 1% lived because no sheikhs live anywhere. everything it would have gone that way, but then it turned out that it is on this whole folder of russian ideology, where all the necessary documents on civil institutions of democracy and on the market from above are posted. on this folder. someone wrote a colonial regime, how about a colonial regime about us. that's how it is inside. we could adopt any kind of laws, but by the supreme anglo-saxon orbiter. we were

still perceived as colonies and our democracy could actually be called democracy. only if we passed its basics to the director for annual. replace and if they didn’t retake it, the overseas director believed that he had the right to punish us and even kill us, but alas, we can firmly say that other previous installations were canceled by the market. nothing decides to spit. they wanted to water this whole market, in which we are so active with them, trade, and to water all the civil institutions that we diligently built, if they felt that we were out of hand. so all these european values ​​and other nonsense. we need something more reasonable to replace since no one in these european values ​​with us. he doesn't play barbarians anymore. and how to replace the soviet union we seem to have passed the monarchs, no one is going to establish. yes, this is

impossible. so, too, we then go unconfirmed rumors that the kremlin is talking about the creation and finally. the ideologies of the future call for all sorts of smart people, for example, they called and say dugin alexander gelevich. and prokhanova alexander andreevich maybe not only they were called, but they are not spoken too much, i believe. i think it's all rumors, but i'll say a couple of words about it anyway dugin and porokhanov would be an option close to ideal, but i will say right away that, in general, our state is not in anyone's councils. never needed and does not need to this day, roughly speaking, no one was summoned to the kremlin in the old days. they simply knew and occasionally took into account the opinions of all sorts of thinkers and talkers, if quite directly tretyakov derzhavin zhukovsky pushkin chaadaev. dostoevsky tyutchev ilyin mayakovsky did not create silks for the ideology of our country. although we could, with a very big stretch, we can talk about a certain influence on the ideology of the lomonosov karamzin

gorky, but in fact, and they are not, not the ideologists of our country. did ideologists create in this case, for example, the monk philathia or, say, victorious. it's closer. wall, but in general it must be admitted that the ideologist. we have always had one tsar, the ideology of russia was created by vladimir the red sun yaroslav the wise ivan the terrible peter the great mother ekaterina lenin stalin personally man-made. so it doesn’t matter whether or not our fathers of thinkers are invited to the kremlin, it is important that, judging by on all the latest speeches of the commander-in-chief. he himself thought about the direction of our ideology , one word patriotism in order to understand where we are going turned out to be small. it is too big and does not explain anything in a difficult situation

. it is stretched to ugly candice, it is necessary to narrow down the ideology. the commander-in-chief formulates his words to us, listens to the rumble of guns in for military correspondents, with whom, as they say several times, bypassing everything protocols met in order to have the most honest information about the situation on the fronts. and on the one hand, the gait of the russian soldier is the idealism of courage, and on the other hand. the same market, the market has not gone away, in the sphere, the show business culture of the cinema of the media theater still reigns, as it were, a market, in fact, those who seized control in 1991 reign there, but they unanimously pretend that got there due to their unheard of competitive advantages. you will say why. i suddenly went to talking about culture. if you just talked about ideology. well of course the answer is obvious.

although the ideology is formulated in our country, the king is born, it is still in the sphere of culture in the broadest sense in painting and architecture in poetry and philosophy, the most complex ideas were tested and competed there. and moscow, the third rome, orthodoxy , autocracy, nationality, all power by council. these ideas were first boiled in the soup of culture, and then they were already served to the sovereign on the table, and he made his tsar's choice and led the country. not miss the events and people of the week on central television. the polish crisis of the ukrainian missile that hit nato territory almost provoked the third world war. but what was it really, an accidental shot or a deliberate provocation and what conclusions will the west draw from the missile incident? will there be no winter breaks? why military experts are sure that with the onset of cold weather, offensive operations in the special military operation zone will not subside, but, on the contrary, will intensify where to expect new strikes

and how can we figure it out from the winter company? amanita fever, in order to make a multi-million dollar business on poisonous mushrooms, the russians decided to convince me that small doses are harmless, as under the guise of dietary supplements for correction, health, poisonous hallucinogens are also sold. from which article amanitas suddenly became edible. this will be your central television tomorrow at 19:00 on ntv and now remember that we entered the year 2022 in the month of march with a sense of disaster, but not the military, but cultural culture, at least its noticeable some suddenly raised their paws, paws, claws and claws and hurried to surrender to georgia, israel, the usa, italy anywhere, a significant part, of course, remained here and from here speaks to us through the

lip. but there is one simple thing that our non-positives will not understand in any way. as they call being in a real party of the world, in fact, you could just easily find yourself in it already in 2014. to do this, it was only necessary to take a breath and say out loud, let the residents of the donetsk and luhansk regions vote where they want to live. well it it’s just that our peace party instead confidently sang a different song in the donbass, putin’s stalinists live. both the prisoner and the place in the ukrainian prison rashka are evil russian lackeys. may all your motorolas die. well, the attitude towards this party of peace in russia has developed accordingly, you are not the party of the world, sorcerers, pharisees and russophobes. in the most direct, most concrete sense of the word. when the first shock has passed. we began to think. how did it happen when they broke down all

these people whom the country loved so much from pugacheva and khamatova, before grebenshchikov and shevchuk, pugachev called for putin to vote quite recently, and khamatova, too, grebenshchikov met with medvedev 's gnaw, surkov mocked everyone who called him to go into the liberal opposition to power. he did not want to join the opposition at all, but yuri yuliant. shevchuk for example, the newspaper arguments and facts, 2004 . and i won’t tell you the way, so one warrior in the field sees square him of patriotism over putin, not everyone, probably, knows the round skies of people who died square living no malicious intent. putin no. thirst for enrichment, too, i'm convinced he serves russia putin cuts. so he said, why did shevchuk fall out of love with putin so suddenly, along with the entire main mass of the people, which some of them call only serfs. it doesn’t

seem that the answer is simple, while putin was perceived as the leader of the liberal conservatives, as a marketer, as a westerner, as the builder of european values ​​in russia, even for shevchuk, and even more so for pugachev and makarevich and for everyone else. he was the father of others, but, in the extreme in the case of the godfather, the returned soviet anthem is a bit of imperial rhetoric. the pacification of the caucasus , they even forgave georgia to putin, including as a result of the total europe-centrism of our liberals. the caucasus is sad for them, but in general, that there is this caucasus whose not london 2014 turned everything upside down they all sharply fell out of love with our guarantor of our president the guarantor dared to go across the west also offend a ukrainian woman who was half a step closer on the path to civilization than russia 2022 the year just drove them crazy in their understanding. no a sane person will not challenge. the united states, after all

, the united states is a city on a hill, shining anat and what is needed, we, like little pronata, tell our artists and singers all the time by a liberal writer and director, saying that nato would come to crimea nato would come to kiev donetsk to kharkov, but they are for the fact that everything was nato is what we scare them with. their dream. they want everything around us to be nato at some point it became clear. we need a different culture. it is clear that the people involved in the new year's lights do not want to go anywhere. they are like 30 years old they sat there, they will sit there for another 30 years. they just learn a song about donbass in chorus, and they will continue to sit, people seem to have resigned themselves to this and expect that another culture will grow in parallel on its lawn away from the new year's light and other this mess, more, perhaps, an honest culture, a tragic human culture, which has the right to

inherit that yesterday's culture, where vasily shukshin was mikhail sholokhov claudia shulzhenko alexander vertinsky georgy sviridov and tikhon khrennikov helium, korzhik and all moiseenko where it was incredible generation of veterans. in the end. now the popular idea has arisen that the veterans of their new russian culture will create a new russian culture. they say we will be created by our non- warriors after the victory in our war of liberation or after the premiere. it seems to me that, alas, this is a misconception, yes, our modern culture in russia is permeated not just with westernism and liberalism, but with imitation of colonial feeling, and most importantly, with secret hostility towards the russian people and certainly towards the russian army, but will the new culture be created by the soldiers and officers who have returned from the front, i will say right away, sorry for the harshness. no, they won't, don't get angry. i will explain now, if everything remains as it is, if all

institutions arrive in their places, no one will create any new culture for us. speak so they will create a new culture the same as saying the warriors. they will come and build a spaceship, because they are good men and we will all fly to mars together. we have a virtuoso violinist piotr lundstrom and a world famous pianist. valentine foxes. they constantly act in the zone of their own. we have a world-class violinist , a researcher of medieval russian music , andrey reshytin, who asked to volunteer for the front. all of them love and support our army, but they are strangers in the musical environment and we don’t have to say that it will end and their own and the warriors will create new symphonic music and compose new famous orchestras, become virtuosos and glorify the fatherland to write music from poetry, to make films and create the philosophy of new times. need to study warriors have a different profession for this, they studied to be warriors. the mobilized studied for their

civilian professions, and not for philosophers, not for artists, not for musicians. here is a simple example. for 8 years we had the most brutal war in the north caucasus - terrorists. watches, all the scum of the world slipped, sponsored by our, as usual, sworn partners. how many people fought there for russia and our russians fought, there were the buryats and the chechens and dagestanis themselves, then they swept all the terrorist pony from their land, and that these people then created a new culture in russia no, while they were fighting there, it frolicked and intensified, liberal and mass culture were all these laughers and jokers, and the veterans returned from the front and went home, so the song about the earring with malaya bronnaya and the song about cranes, no one wrote to us in these years, but did the donbass begin yesterday? no, 8 years, the militia fought there, and not only they speak directly, and not a single major poet or director, artist or philosopher. so

that the whole country recognized them from among them, alas, not came out. it didn't work out. rather, this is how a wonderful poet appeared from among the militias. grigory yegorkina from among the military correspondents magnificent poet, semyon pegov but this is because the yegorks are actually professional playwrights who went into the militia. and pegov are professional journalists. they had basic philological skills. you will say, but what about the prose of the great patriotic war, but i will tell you now about the officers of the patriotic war who wrote the great lieutenant's pose. yuri bondarev graduated from the literary institute in 1951 year, and entered it in the forty-fifth immediately after the war. that's how he ended, and then grigory baklanov began to write in the fifty-first year in the same year he graduated from the literary institute of viktor astafyev from fifty-ninth to sixty-first he studied at higher literary courses in moscow viktor kurochkin, who in the war, as in the war, graduated in the fifty-ninth year by correspondence branch of the literary institute front-line poets. konstantin simonov evgeny dolmatovsky graduated from the literary institute. and even before the war. paratrooper

konstantin vanshenkin in 1953. graduated from lid who wrote it. i love you life. i hope that it is for him that yevgeny vinokurov is the one who wrote poems about the earring with malaya bronnaya vitka and mokhova in the fifty-first year he graduated from the same institute, and another front-line soldier wrote the music for this song. andrey shpai, but he wrote the music not because he volunteered for the war not because he bravely fought, but because after he met in berlin on may 9 he went to study as a composer, and graduated in the fifty-third year. pskov conservatory in the class of compositions, and another front-line soldier yan frenkel, who was seriously injured in 1942 and after the war wrote music for the great song cranes. to multiply these endless examples, but let me just say, yes, great culture was created by professionals of the highest level, or

composers. according to this, musicians already having an education went to the front, either in compulsory studied well after the front. including film art painting philosophy literature. it was a gigantic system that lenin began to create, stalin made it incredibly, branched, effective, penetrating the whole of society. we now have a situation where radical artists and poets go to the front, as a rule, do not go in any capacity, even as volunteers. we do not have a system of literary military correspondents under the mini. two defenses similar to the one that stalin created by attributing almost the entire union of writers to military printed publications giving writers military ranks and, as a result, having received a whole plast of brilliant war correspondents who went through the entire patriotic war and not only it, finally. can you seriously assume that thousands of veterans will go after the war to study as poets and painters. well, no, of course, in russia it is not very clear how to live for these classes and who needs it at all. but most importantly, these institutions are controlled by completely different people

who, as a rule, have seen all these of your own in the coffin . i still imagine myself as a veteran of this war will be, say, the union of cinematographers or, for example, in their journalists and ask. well, learn me a soldier for a start, he is not an egg, but if the eggs are on him, they will look there from under shaggy eyebrows in such a way that he would prefer to take mariupol again, but never deal with these people again. they will tell me now that we need to shake up these institutions and put other people there. well shake it up, i'll tell you a secret. it's called the cultural revolution. nobody will do it. that old culture arose not because here it is took and arose, but because the state had an order for this when the offensive exams at vgik. in the forty-sixth year, grigory chukhrai, a newly demobilized lieutenant with a fragment in his lung, was asked what you did in the army, and what you want to do in art are different things.

he answered firmly. if someone in battle did not justify our hopes, it was not because he did not know the methods of combat or the handling of weapons, but because at a critical moment he lacked a sense of duty and dignity. i tried to support these feelings in art will do the same. with such an attitude, they came from the front to art through cultural institutions through soviet universities, institutes, workshops of thousands of names. they came from the front, in the system which they were waiting for was interested in them. i wanted to teach them and learned them or gave institutional forms for creative realization, and military experience in itself, alas, does not write pictures and does not make films. do not reassure yourself, either the state needs it or not. i remember in the program of ivan urgant was

such a joke. they showed the school class of the future and on the walls in the form of classics of russian literature. portraits of morgenstern face hung. noise oksimiron rappers are like that and then it was not fun, but rather disgusting, because poetry existed in those days, russian modern poetry, but even talking about it out loud was zapadno then, but how did it change in one year, funny by historical standards situation, firstly, it seems that none of those whom ivan hung on the wall is already in russia today. yes, and he himself banned something, secondly, a huge part of the country, especially reading countries, now you know the names of the poets anna debt vlad malenko semyon pegova anna and revyakina alexander pelevin igor karaulov, these names sprouted on their own for the most part, blamed for eight years since february looking at the scattered intelligentsia of the state. stoloska, whom to call on tv from among the

people who support our army and suddenly saw these poets, made out, finally began to invite them. yes, the country is experiencing a tragedy, it is we we remember every second, but the country was returned the poets in the country were returned along with the painted, roosters, which you can’t drive the musicians from the perch. they returned, who can formulate the most important ones to sing about the most important yuli chicherin, even the honored artist was finally awarded. and after all , there is alexei dzhang-like and the group, st. john's wort, completely new discoveries. akim apaches recited stupid tales to us, put on dirty dirty plays, drugged us with living towers, pumped us up with obscene songs. we swam in the river and slaughtered and forgot about native images on the channel began to go paid her against the look of the eye, but the time has come for other breeds to us and how else we go. deep jazz of the people feeling through purgatory to whom heavenly places, to whom

cauldrons? we don’t have to live here to grieve, in a new way you ca n’t hide here anymore, brooms. we hungry headlines , i don't know how long all this has come, but it happened at least now it happened with joyful surprise. i look, now, how anna dolgorev is giving in, all over the country alone or in the company of the poets named above, collecting huge platforms, real concert halls. circulations of poetry books with poems dedicated to the donbass, which began to be published little by little, diverge even at the pre-order stage. before our eyes, russia is returning to the era after the revolutionary twenties of the 20th century or the post-war 60s of the 20th century, when the names of poets, including singing ones, could therefore compete with the names of artists or singers in popularity, if anything saddens. it is painful not the rootedness of these changes that surprise. in a way , no institutionalization of ongoing processes in 8

months of war did not happen to a whole galaxy of patriotic poets, philosophers, musicians, and not a platform appeared. although in moscow there is not a single room, where these poets could be based and have a bookstore. there is no publishing house. there is no radio station. there is no magazine. we do not have a single objectively patriotic university where about their beliefs. you can say out loud and not run into the rudeness of classmates brought up by sobchak and specialists from the journalism faculty of moscow state university or higher schools economics, the lack of institutions, alas, entails inevitable consequences, as soon as all this trouble with the war ends with the lights barely turned on in the poetic musical patriotic world. immediately cut down and at best they will say, this is the most. well, thanks for helping out. you got to sing about it. this is our earth, we will not leave. well sang for the soul burst right, well, let's goodbye. that's not how it should happen, you

hear, these people were cut for their army for their country, when nine-tenths of the cultures, sparkling with their heels, ran in all directions, but these, about which i am talking, did not leave the country. know how to be grateful to them, no one asks you for a revolution in culture since you are not ready for it. no one asks for everything, no one asks, even half of them ask for a corner where you can put the guitar and stand on the edge of the stage to read a rhyme poem, comrade ministry of culture, i'm turning to you .

hello everyone today's release. we decided to start an arboretum. this is the favorite place of our heroes. they spend their weekends here, which is no wonder. not enough air at home. the family living room, for example, looks more like a gymnasium being attacked by the grandchildren of the owner of the apartment, tatiana, three come to visit, two live in the next room. here he likes to attract dogs and alabai breeds, while the room is also the bedroom of oksana, the mother of three of these young tomboys, asking for help and waiting for gifts. oksana is not used to the application to our program was written by her eldest daughter irina she is the main zhivchik in the family, introduces everyone to an active lifestyle. well, how i envy you and such a large arboretum with such activities across the road.