thousands of people will go to the front as volunteers if something happens to the lavra. this is what they want. that's the church - this is what is now happening around the church. this is actually a separate topic, i won't have time for replicas in any case, but about space and red lines. you know, i served in the rocket and space defense back in the late eighties, and i remember that even then we had methods, well, how to say, creating interference, to put it mildly, with an enemy satellite without launching missile strikes and using the most modern types of weapons. and uh, where did these interferences come from. none of our opponents knew, i say again, it was the end of the eighties. i am sure that now we have gone far ahead in these technologies, which is why even now you see, as soon as all of a sudden the satellites of stalink, some problems arose. i don’t know, probably by accident, of course, by accident, but musk immediately changed his policy regarding the use of these satellites

in ukraine and became worried. that is, i believe that we have the ability to withdraw the enemy infrastructure in space without direct collision crossing red lines. margarine, there is even before any space. i will simply voice the proposal, not mine, but the proposal of those officers about whom i spoke, with whom i spoke a few days ago. they even gave me the coordinates of 15-20 objects of railway junction bridges, which , if they are destroyed by us, will stop all possibilities of further supply of weapons to ukraine. these people are sitting opposite me in my office and came to visit and ask. can you explain to me why we do n't do it. i can’t explain, maybe someone can explain simply with coordinates, that is, they say that if we disable this , this, this, then all supplies will end. and on this. actually, the war will end, because we are at war with these supplies,

and not with any kiev for a very long time. yes, here mr. stoltenberg is doing it paradoxically, the only way in the long-term world is global peace, and is to continue military supplies to ukraine and since this is the only way russia realizes that it will not achieve victory on the battlefield, it will be forced to sit down at the negotiating table. all thanks to everyone. this is what the bet is being made on, that they will continue to pump them pump up pump pump up, that we are still inertia by inertia, by inertia from one side to the other. and we are kind, kind, kind on the third side, we will continue to make such fairly serious statements, but no more than that, exactly this is the bet, and then as they say. at some point, we will suddenly realize that we have only one single option left so that we are not destroyed, as this bandit from the nineties, nicknamed the ball, promises us, in my opinion, yes, the ball yes, and for in order to prevent this from happening with us, there will be only

one and only trump yes, about which we will have to use. that is why we must always bring it to the last to the last, because you can really work systematically, you need to break the situation at the front. need to be tough on all sorts of shri, where marches of various baltic and non-baltic states must be sent from here, these diplomatic missions, which are completely incomprehensible. why do we need here to minimize our participation in various international organizations ? this is what concerns the russian side. until we start doing this. they will think that, and not today. tomorrow they will succeed, and they are at victory. we need it, we don’t need it. everyone met exactly one week later in this studio, remember that all participants in our program have their own truth, but we will

always get to the bottom of the truth. we will talk about the russian decembrists sincerely, but unsuccessfully trying to change the course of history in 1825, while most of the decembrists did not want any comparisons with liberal europe at all, this is important , moreover, by today's standards, the decembrists were not westerners. but just anti-reserves russophiles, or, as the decembrists would say today, were military men, and of course, any warriors led by russia were considered the norm. if they were told that russia is bad, because it is at war , they would not even understand what we are talking about in general, in this understanding there is a difference between you and the decembrists who suffer them.

the decembrist uprising in st. petersburg in 1825 lasted only six hours. however, hundreds of books, thousands of scientific works, hundreds of poems and poems, dozens of films in people, will be devoted to these six hours. those who organized the uprisings fell in love, then girls women admired their names raved pundits dedicated them. for a whole life, their names were familiar half a century ago. every inhabitant of our country. lunin ryleev is a bunch of brothers, without the hard ants of the apostles, annenki. we will talk about the russian decembrists sincerely, but unsuccessfully trying to change the course of history in 1825, who are they? why and

why they did this traitors freemasons not far- sighted adventurers or seekers of justice can say why they did them at all to say, they lost achieved nothing. i must say that the word lost in a historical context does not mean, in fact, sometimes defeat weighs no less than victory, you know, spartak also lost and stepan timofeevich razin lost and che guevara certainly lost their names weigh no less than exactly those to whom they are you lost them for sure and don’t remember nicholas ii lost by the february conspirator and his own general. the soviet union lost to gorbachev and yeltsin. christ was crucified, well now not only victories are measured by history. if we now start talking about the decembrists in any honest

company, then if this is not a historical circle, the question is, who are these same decembrists ? was reading. long live the constitution, the star was accepted for his happiness, do not promise the young maiden, whom did you hang pestle there, woke herzen at the depth of the siberian ores, the wives of the decembrists, in general, they were all exiled to hard labor, seems to be forever, and buried there. but the decembrist uprising of 1825, friends. mine is one of the significant events and turning points. recall briefly emperor alexander i did not have a male heir, and therefore his brother was considered the official heir, the second son of paul i, prince konstantin pavlovich konstantin pavlovich refused to reign, therefore emperor alexander i officially notified the third brother nikolai pavlovich in advance that he would reign, then

alexander i died suddenly because constantine did not make any public renunciation according to the laws of the empire. he was supposed to automatically become emperor nicholas i, who had only a verbal notification of alexander i, proved to the governor-general of st. petersburg miloradovich his rights to the throne, but here he was inexorable. as a result, konstantin pavlovich nevertheless confirmed the renunciation in writing, then nikolai pavlovich signed a manifesto on accession to the thrones, in which he declared himself emperor ; between the kingdom and decided to take advantage of the decembrists' plan. they had such a leader of the speech, the conspirators elected prince sergei trubetskoy, colonel of the hero of the patriotic war of 1812, the headquarters of the officer of the fourth infantry corps of the decembrists, planned to capture the winter palace and the peter and paul fortress, arrest

the imperial family and force the senate to proclaim the destruction of the former government with the parallel appointment of a provisional government. in russia, it was planned to introduce the constitution, one of the decembrists, alexander bestuzhev, came to the barracks. the moscow regiment, already ready for the oath, began to assure the soldiers that they were being deceived, that tsarevich konstantin had never abdicated and would soon be in st. petersburg, that he was alexander bestuzhev , his adjutant and purposely sent by the emperor forward. the soldier bestuzhev would entice them in this way and led them to the senate. square, believing this deception, other regiments entered the square at the same time. there, near the embankment of st. isaac's cathedral, thousands of people gathered with ordinary people; petersburg from warsaw and was taken under the arrest of the baubles, but soon the troops would liberate him, soon the excited crowd was screaming. hooray, konstantin, one way or another

, the decembrist was taken to the senate square, the soldiers of the moscow and grenager regiments, who had given in to their call of the guards, as well as the sailors of the guards naval crew, according to various estimates. the uprising was attended by from 2,350 to 3,000 military personnel, but not all participants in secret societies supported the idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe forceful overthrow of the emperor, the future emperor nikolai pavlovich was warned in advance about the conspiracy, therefore, senators. they swore allegiance to him early in the morning and managed to disperse part of the troops that were supposed to teach. the uprising in the street did not come out to potential leader sergei trubetskoy for the senate. ploschad didn't show up i watched what was happening from the window of the main headquarters. petersburg military governor-general, hero of the patriotic war of 1812. mikhail miloradovich tried to persuade the conspirators to surrender voluntarily, but the retired lieutenant, who distinguished himself in the caucasus, pyotr kakhovskiy, mortally wounded the miloradovichi, who went out to the rebels. nikolay behaved himself

reservedly. although in fact he did not know how to be a metropolitan in such a situation. st. petersburg seraphim of glagolevsky persuaded the decembrists to lay down their arms, but nothing came of it, having exhausted the possibilities for negotiating, nikolai , who was then 29 years old, ordered to open artillery fire on the remaining artillery and hit the winter palace, the artillerymen made seven volleys of grapeshot , one over the heads of the remaining, and the rest on to suppliers soldiers and onlookers gathered around the square turned to flight officially , 1271 people became victims of the uprising soldiers sailors and residents of st. petersburg that were in the area of ​​​​the square several hundred guardsmen were immediately or soon arrested in the case of the uprising 579 people were officially arrested decembrist leaders pavel pestel sergey muravyov apostle mikhail bestuzhevyumin kondraty ryleev and pyotr kakhovskiy were sentenced to quartering, which

nicholas i replaced by hanging the sentence was executed on july 25, 1826. the indecisive actions of the decembrists during the outbreak of the massacre, and also the strange behavior of some rebels predetermined the failure about trubetskoy, we have already said relief did not even join the marchers, but the hero of the caucasian war stood aside. captain alexander yakubovich, the appointed commander of the moscow regiment, referred to the main pain and disappeared from the square, then returned. he approached the emperor and asked for permission to personally persuade his comrades to surrender. then he went to them as a truce and said to the guselber. keep you afraid and retired the remaining officers

to the senate. you wouldn't even have his experience, had excellent combat experience. the real hero , a participant in the war of 1812 of the borodino battle of the foreign campaign, pavel pesteln, he led the southern secret society, and by that time the decembrists had already been arrested, they were doomed to defeat in advance, not only because of organizational issues. the very case when one of the unconditional trump cards, surprise, became the main disadvantage. the plan was developed in just a few days , there was no single leader, which, of course, was necessary, there was no single program, there was no homogeneity. well yes, the power of the emperor was proposed to be abolished according to the constitution of the ants. russia was supposed to become a constitutional monarchy, in which the tsar would have purely representative functions ; it sounds european when it comes to the views of the decembrists and they want to belittle and discredit them; most often they refer to pestel

; he said the song was a villain in all the power of the word without the slightest hint of remorse. with a brutal expression and the most audacious denial of courage. i suppose that it is rare to find such a monster. song was indeed the most radical of the decembrist ideologists of the border of a single and indivisible state of the russian pestel planned the arctic sea to the north to the east a large ocean to the south of china sayan and altai mountains, turkestan bukhari impassable sands between the caspian and aral seas persia turkey black sea danube and wallachia to the west, hungary poland prussia the baltic sea the gulf of bothnia and sweden poland was to be in close alliance with russia and tied to it bialystok and the grodno region, if poland decided for itself that it was not an ally of russia, then i quote pestel will not exist at all, then the

state border between poland and russia will exist poland will then remain a region of the russian state and russia will maintain its current borders with austria throughout the space and prussia. and pestel also had a list of lands that russia needs and needs to be attached to firmly establish state security among the land, we quote, moldova, those lands of the mountainous caucasian the peoples of russia not subject to russia, which lie to the north of the borders with persia and turkey, the lands of the kyrgyz garden ord and, finally, part of mongolia so that the entire course of the amur, starting from the lake downstream, belongs to russia. and, of course, pestel was a staunch supporter of a unitary unified state, generally speaking , he was by today's nationalist standards, despite his german origin. his ancestors came to russia in the 17th century. pestel considered himself russian. the russian truth

of pavel pestel divided the peoples inhabiting the country into ranks first. that is, this is a native russian, the second of the tribes attached to russia, the third of the foreigners who have come to visit him. naturally, he did not attribute the peasants. according to the project, they simply freed them and gave them land. by what principle did the pestil not describe at the same time the constitution of nikita muravyov assumed two ten on the ground per peasant, in fact. this is at the estate plot of the state structure of the decembrists. seen approx. at the same level of unity. nikita ants. his like-minded people went to install, limited monarchy, the song fought for the republic , however, not only for the destruction of the autocracy, but, alas, the extermination of members of the royal house. and according to the truth of pestel and according to the constitution of muravyov , women and the illiterate were also deprived of the right to vote, while most of the decembrists did not want any comparisons with liberal europe at all, this is important, moreover, by today's standards, the decembrists were not westerners. and

just anti-western russophiles, or, as they would say today, quilted jackets, you need to understand that at that time, the russian empire was a huge part of the russian aristocracy , barely able to speak russian, the french and the polyakovs considered to be recognized as much more worthy peoples than their own men, in fact, no interest in russian national culture, russian song, russian fairy tale epic, russian icon painting to russian architecture practically did not manifest itself in our aristocracy, the only thing that was considered best and worthy was that there was europe. these are not the decembrists, they considered russia backward. she's the opposite of power the state considered. i got them in the decembrists, they sang russian songs, dressed up in russian caftans , arranged russian breakfasts. the so-called, where they ate cabbage, drank vodka, sang of yermak and the ancient princes and heroes and wished to give at least part of the people will this information for those who still

believe that in 1825 russia turned down the path of democratic reforms and again turned away from the federal bourgeois europe yes, the decembrists did not see europe no model. they wanted a russian and, to the best of their ability, a free states. it's a sin for me too. she went against zelensky and did not worry that i would not cross the border. i was worried that i would be raped in prison in order to find my classmate in our host. she was told that i was dead and threatened him ukraine although we will kill. we will stab you and bury you, but we could get through from donetsk there, your heads will not be unscrewed. you are traitors to marina who lasted. husband of a poodle and i refuse a name day. i do not want to return to ukraine sunday on ntv when they talk about the decembrists

they immediately remember about the masonic lodges, that is, if the decembrists were freemasons, they, as it were, automatically become traitors to the motherland, then it is more and more difficult, of course, the passion for freemasonry. at that time, it had nothing to do with the transfer of secret data to a secret lodge or a direct conspiracy against the tsar, and so on, general matvey aleksandrovich dmitriev mamonov, one of the favorites of catherine the great and the chief, gendarmov alexander khristoforovich, benkendorf and count alexei anatolyevich orlov davydov, they were all masonic and official government let me remind you that the husbands of the unconditional elite of the state to the freemasons were alexander sergeevich pushkin, at least for a very short time, father. pushkin sergey lvovich pushkin's uncle vasily lvovich were famous and were masons in high masonic ranks, as people did not represent any secret for him. these were essentially his masonic relatives. the famous lyceum, which pushkin graduated from, and the teachers and graduates of pushkin, gorchakov and khlebakers, were their

freemasons, who was in the masonic lodge and the brother of alexander i konstantin pavlovich when just 3 years before the decembrist uprising in 1822 , the russian emperor alexander i finally. signed a riskscript on the closure of masonic lies it turned out that only in the guards members of the masonic lies were 517 people. among them are two generals, seven lieutenant generals and 52 major generals. so it's not so primitive with these lodges. you never know who was freemasonry in them, did not make them secret agents of western intelligence services. this format of organization was used as a means of conspiracy. yes and sharm closed fraternal society the union of some inaccessible majority of the community captivated the stars of the russian officers of young romantic idealists. and most likely, this was precisely the key problem in the naivety of their views and the unbridled desire to change everything for the better at once. it is understandable, but it must be recognized as a fatal

aspiration. if we compare the decembrists and the current liberal oppositionists, then we should note two main differences between the decembrists, in contrast to the current survivors under ngos. no help from the west would be accepted or even considered. these options, the decembrists, were military and, of course, any warriors led by russia were considered the norm. if they were told that russia is bad, because it is at war, they would not even understand what we are talking about in general, in this understanding there is a difference between you and the decembrists who suffer them. they wanted a different motherland, but they did not change the very idea of ​​​​the motherland. in essence. it has always been obvious. only now, alas, with political goals, the decembrists are sometimes portrayed as demons and placed. a number with the current fugitives in israel to georgia is the difference again let me remind you that

the decembrists sent to hard labor and exile did not just run away from the war already following there, but begged them to be sent to any war that their state is waging and some of them received this right, because apparently and the sovereign secretly knew the instinct of warriors and statesmen is the most important among them. and when we begin to evaluate the decembrists condescendingly for the needs of time and the latest market conditions, we must remember that we, together with them, evaluate pushkin with the same condescension. after all, it is not only in depth siberian ores sent a message, but also wrote these poems about the decembrists, there were a lot of boats, others, the sail was strained, others together rested deep into the powerful oars in silence for the role, bowing our smart pilot in silence. terrible bees ruled, a. careless faith is full of swimmers, i sang, suddenly the bosom of the waves crumpled onto the ice the noisy whirlwind died and the

feeder and the swimmer, only i the mysterious singer was thrown ashore by a thunderstorm. i sing the old hymns and dry my wet robe in the sun under the rock, i sing the old hymns. here is what pushkin wrote in the past, he did not disappointed in the truth that his dead comrades were carrying, because according to pushkin, that truth of the decembrists did not contradict the idea of ​​the russian state. it must be remembered that even the most radical decembrists did not rule out a peaceful scenario. in 1820, pavel song was going to taganrog to offer the emperor zilka, who was resting there, to refuse revolutionary actions on their part in response to the beginning of long-planned reforms on the part of the emperor. if successful , the decembrists were going to become loyal supporters of the authorities and actively participate in the implementation of reforms.

that is, they both served the state and wanted to continue to serve it. changes have long been suggested by the authorities and many decembrists themselves did not deny it, and were completely against revolutionary mechanisms. i have never been lovers of the revolution or riots, but on the contrary, i have always wished true peace and good for my fatherland, a sacrifice to whom i am ready to offer everything that i have and my very life, if it were necessary to admit the midshipman. disk crew pyotr belyaev , the decembrist, we note that these were the most delicate educated people who, unlike modern pseudo-liberal pseudo-intellectuals did not consider it possible to take the responsibility to draw conclusions from the whole people from the whole vast country. although they had dozens of times more rights to this than other current rivermen now, they disagree, we read the decembrists of yevgeny obolensky , an active participant in the uprising, do we have the right,

as private people, who make up a barely noticeable unit in the vast majority of the population of our fatherland, to undertake a coup d'etat and own way of looking at the state devices to impose almost forcibly on those who may be content with the present not looking for the best. if they seek and strive for the best, then they seek and strive for it through historical development. this thought haunted me for a long time. why did we start this conversation at all, but to the fact that, firstly, the figure of the decembrists is still largely underestimated, and secondly, conversations about them are often limited to events at 17, at best, with a link. well, often, perhaps the most important honest services in their lives motherland and redemption by blood happened to them before or after the decembrist uprising. those who did not go to war or were not allowed to go to war even worked in exile, who arrived in chita ostrog at the end.