preletarian past bright rich civilized future i myself believed in it, it seemed that a little. and we will overcome everything. one push didn't work. in some ways, i turned out to be too naive rhetoric train of thought. unfortunately, everything is indicative just like that. and it seemed, yes, and still seems to some, gray stagnant totalitarian , it’s all soviet conservative bastard drunken and proletarian rich civilized everything connected with the west of europe usa pepsi-cola progress desire to enter the community or even more to take communion to become part of the western powers, alas, quite symptomatic was

common. unfortunately, for a long time there have been few people in our country who wanted to go along the uneven russian road. however, back in the 19th century, something happened that had to happen, a whole layer of russian philosophical thought was created, which gave ground for its own formulation of the idea of ​​the russian world , now well known not only us and our neighbors, but also a western partner, really. now not everyone understands. what were they in? the scale of russian philosophers is considered by some to be secondary imitators of foreign colleagues. frivolous, they say, schopenhaur, nietzsche hegel schellen, fichte feuerbach. this is real philosophy, and berdyaev solovyov ilyin roznov, something so ephemeral, even secondary. well , let's see what we have there. in order not to pass off wishful thinking, let's say right away

that russian philosophy had a connection with western philosophy, of course, like russian symphonic music and russian literature, russian ballets, russian cinema, there is nothing surprising in this at all, because the west - it's not some. there, a separate country, there are many countries and many they influenced a friend, and we influenced them in exactly the same way as they influenced us pineapples influenced them, rome and byzantium she rome byzantium was influenced by ancient greece so roughly speaking, everything is secondary here, especially america canada and australia because they later to these processes are connected. so the influence was not dependent , it was not independent in the highest sense, this must be understood, if there is a serious desire to reflect on these topics, russian philosophy, we emphasize that it was especially conceptually different from western from the romantic approach of western of our colleagues, you quickly came to the patriological spiritual approach, that

is, based on the cult of the spirit of theology and the unique knowledge of the church fathers, if the western model of integrity is the harmony of all the forces of the spirit of the mind of the will. the faith of love, then according to the tristical one, implies the subordination of feelings and reason to the spirit, as the embodiment of divine power in man. that is why the slavophiles and russian philosophers plunged into the context of our orthodox culture. collected ancient chronicles translated the creation of the fathers in the church polotskets, and largely thanks to them the old russian cultural heritage. it came to life, it started to work, and in the end. even elementary preserved. yes, on the neck days, like everything else. it originated, like much in russia from the war, the formation of philosophy in russia as a form of public activity was caused by an explosive phenomenon of national feeling after the victorious patriotic war of 1812,

almost 20 years later. after these events, pyotr chaadaev wrote the famous philosophical letters, where gorko reasoned that russia lives only in the most limited, present without the past and without the future among flat stagnation. and yet, in order to make ourselves notice, we had to stretch from the bering strait to the odar. yes, again, the empire pyotr yakovlevich chaadaev, a participant in the patriotic war from a limited campaign, was born in the russian army. mr. one of the most brilliant nobles of st. petersburg friendship with which alexander sergeevich pushkin was proud well, it would be more accurate to say that chaadaev is one of the defining people. in pushkin's own formation. due to a misunderstanding, we consider chadaev to be the first liberal. but if today's liberals are forced to chadaev, read aloud. they will fall off their faces and throw this book of his out the window, and the state. russia chaadaev, for example, says, i think that it is a great advantage to be

able to contemplate and judge the world from the entire height of thought, free from unbridled passions and miserable bones, which in other places cloud the gaze of a person and pervert his judgments, moreover, i have a deep conviction, that we, that is, the russians, are called upon to solve most of the problems of the social order, to complete most of the ideas, that arose in the old, that is, european societies, to answer the most important questions. should the russians wrote to chadaev, yes, the most important questions that occupy humanity are taught. let's continue, there were unconditional predictions, for example, socialism will win not because he is right, but because his opponents said so and insisted in relation to world civilization are wrong. we are in a very special position, not yet having any connection with what is happening in europe, we are therefore more disinterested more

impersonal more impartial, on all subjects of dispute than the european people we are, in a way, legal judges on all higher world issues. what , speaking of politics and science, chadaev wrote, we need to separate ourselves and the russian people great and powerful, i think chaadaev wrote to me not to submit to the influence of other peoples, but from his side to influence them. well, where have you seen such liberals, the main thing is often the only thought, which is that russia must obey europe and do as she is told, but if she is put in a corner on peas, go into a corner and not appear. at the center of chaadaev's historical concept is the purely orthodox idea of ​​building the kingdom of god on earth, of achieving an enlightened state of everyday life free from sin. this idea is alien to developed axial cultures, in

particular european, therefore, despite its well-known europe centrism. the idea, chaadaev, is a form of national self-knowledge within the framework of russian orthodox culture, according to the apt remark of nikolai berdyaev after chaadaev understanding the meaning of the history of russia became impossible without answering the questions posed by chaadaev, i didn’t recognize it, apologize rape to a citizen warmly. if you rub our zander's nose, hello honest detective agency justice. only squirrels are faster, i do all the work with high quality. for what purpose did you use access to a closed service database , never before stirlitz with him was there

close to failing you. i already remember i'm afraid of the justice agency, and i'll squeeze your brains out or a soapy investigator. choose the premiere on monday at 20:00 on ntv, the emperor declared chaadaev officially insane after the publication of philosophical ones at that time in russia, unlike the west, there was no philosophy, as a form of national self-reflection of the nation was frightened. but if you think carefully, then chadaev’s thoughts are quite owls. with the arguments of the future slavophil kireevsky in his journal, a european, the first who tried already in the thirties and fifties of the xix century to answer the questions and challenge of

chaadaev were the so-called westerners. the so -called slavophil thinkers who had bipolar views on the future of russia, the slavophiles, whose ranks included aleksey khomyakov. ivan kirievsky, the aforementioned konstantin aksakov, yuri samarin, experienced and perceived the thoughts of a crazy colleague in quotation marks so much that they considered his child’s claims about the absence of history in russia as a slander on russian history from all his ideas, they supported only thoughts about the great future of russia in which saw the happy ending of all human history, the slavophiles believed that the contradictions, their contemporary lives, are not rooted in russian antiquity, and in the petrine reforms, which interrupted the organic development of the russian history of russian culture, they split the entire russian society in two. russian history they wrote is inherent in special historical values ​​that europe does not know the meaning of the history of the west in the unity

of the progressive process of cultural and social development, but this process itself causes the disintegration of consciousness into reason into feelings and will, which begin to act on their own, this is also connected division of society into classes. so they thought in the end in the end, europe comes to a cultural and social crisis, is experiencing the decline of its history, but russia is inherent in it. how did they think such holistic social cultural forms, which, without collapsing, are capable of becoming the basis of higher stages of historical development than those that arose in the west above the braces. now it’s customary to make fun of these different people, but in general, communal relations in russia since ancient times, in essence , were family. that is why, as it was believed in the russian people, power, only then is when it has a patriarchal paternal character, this applies to relations, both the king and the people, and the landowner, peasant,

factory owner of the worker, and so on, and the point here is not at all the triumph of the right to law or freedom, for which the operation is accepted in the west, but in the informal choice of good moral relationships between people of one nation and one faith, the slavophiles could not forgive peter, including the fact that the need for a european understanding legitimately arose after his reform, which destroyed the unity of the russian people, his orthodox of culture and social principles of social life, of course, they were not obscurantist slavophiles, they were people of more than advanced views, not in vain vladimir solovyov was a philosopher. he teased them as archaeological liberals for criticizing harsh radical reforms. peter the slavophils believed that any reforms should be based on a solid foundation of russian history on its civilizational foundations . moreover, the slavophiles had a hand in the abolition of serfdom in russia, prominent slavophiles yuri shamalin was one of the authors of the manifesto on february 19, 1861, about the liberation of the

peasants, and then he was also engaged in organizing the peasant life of the province of the kingdom of poland then, which was part of russia, so aksakov pointed out the difference between the communal and state system of the country and the state of the russian people. in his opinion, he prefers to live according to the internal moral law in communication. they are signed on the legislation of the state in fairness in truth, in which the russian person, according to dostoevsky and balabanov and other smart people, always there was a particular urgent need. in this one. that's true, the highest ideal for the slavophiles was the orthodox church repeats critics. subjected to european cultural influence in russia, it was seen as one-sided rationalism destroying. a higher form of knowledge characteristic of traditional russian culture is the so-called living knowledge. true, this did not force the

slavophiles to deny european culture and love for european education. kirievsky wrote, just as love for ours both coincide in one striving for a living full all human and true christian enlightenment and yet you need to understand the goal of the slavophiles was not the separation of russia from europe , the task was a different restoration of the unity of russian society and culture on the basis of national values. they believed that this would allow russia to take its rightful place in the center of world civilization. at the same time, the country should strive not to become the richest or most powerful country in the world, but to be the most christian of all human societies, what then this is the most notorious slavism, their filstvo , because the united states, as many thousands echo in the statistics table, is the most religious country in the world, and we are their bonds with our reproaches. yes, we have 100 times fewer people going to churches who will tell us something like a table with tables. and faith faith if in catholicism it is customary to carefully

count and weigh sins. and it would be even better to receive an indulgence and, if possible, atone for their repentance by prayer, the fulfillment of the imposed ptimiy with good deeds by deductions to charity, then we have everything is a little different, as i understand it in the orthodox tradition, accounting for accomplished good and evil is generally meaningless in the face of god's providence, any hopes of earning salvation on your own provide at best naive arrogance, and at worst a sin of pride, therefore, you can only rely on the infinity of god's mercy us and the holy intercessors, the orthodox person, who was affirmed and proclaimed by russian philosophers, does not rely on a single act of repentance, but she is the transfiguration poem, by the way, yesenin called it a transfiguration , which we hope will happen before death. let's now personify a little , the russian philosophical trend

, alexei stepanovich khomyakov, can be considered the very first slavophile. more than once we have mentioned a military man, by the way, a man, in addition to this hamster economist practicing landowner, who improved agricultural production, distillation, sugar making, inventor of a new steam engine, received a patent in england, inventor of a long-range gun, by the way, a homeopathic doctor. gifted painter. icon painter. polyglot linguist, therefore music critic. there were people. yes , the main thing is that we didn’t finish his philosophical work khomyakov became notes on world history, the warrior philosopher believed that every nation has a special historical mission, in which one of the sides of the world absolute is the mission of russia, orthodoxy, and its history. the task of freeing the world from one-sided development imposed on western civilization by hamsters believed that every nation

can deviate from its mission, and this is what happened to russia for the reforms of peter i now she needs to get rid of the slavish imitation i forget wrote hamsters and return to her path, the unconditional russian genius. vasily vasilyevich rozanov philosopher, had a habit of writing about the same event , often the opposite thing and under different pseudonyms. so he offered to read the coordinates of reality in his philosophy, he even put himself in the place of a small religious person, facing the most serious issues of distribution, was, according to his colleagues , a creak, a squeal from russian philosophers, descends load history iron curtain. the performance was over, the audience got up, it was time to put on their fur coats and return home, they looked around, but there were no jesters or houses. even before the revolution, naturally, moscow socrates, as he was called nikolai fedorovich fedorov, wrote asceticism and

worked as a modest librarian for almost all his life. he lived in a closet, tried bread and tea, and handed out the remaining money to poor students . fyodor is considered the founder of the doctrine of russian cosmism. his views are set forth in a book with the telling title philosophy of the general affairs. he believed that the main goal of mankind should be the resurrection of all people who have ever lived, then he called the teachings a new pasta, and fedorov understood sunday and subsequent immortality not only in the spiritual, well, in the direct physical sense, based on scientific achievements, similar to fedorov the idea at the same time was expressed by vladimir sergeevich solovyov vladimir solovyov yes, only another, who was looking for ways to free the material world from the destructive action of space. jews, his transformations. you are the uncaptive cosmos quotes and salvation of man through. the divine-human process is also a quote solovyov, for the first time in russia, substantiated the philosophical premise of anthropocasmism, the idea

of ​​unity of the union of all the life-giving elements of the world in the divine absolute, all unity - this is the ideal of being, combining values, truth, goodness, beauty and the ideal of knowledge, connecting reason and feelings, will and faith from the fall of the world from god described the layers. there is his disintegration into warring beginnings, the reunification of these beginnings is the way to achieve perfection under the leadership, and he did not mean only values, but also the direction of knowledge of nature and society solovyov's greatness lies in the fact that he united the scientific religious anthological socio-historical value into a practical paradigm in one doctrine, and he also opposed the russian asceticism to the european one. installation on comfort well, or there for a buzz. solovyov emphasized that it was russian compassion, and not simple western sympathy. is decisive for the category of morality or immorality understand the difference between duty sori and heartfelt compassion

the ability to sympathize is associated with a deep moral feeling, when a compassionate person pleads for his own joy voluntarily shares someone else's suffering philosopher, russian philosopher ivan aleksandrovich ilyin defended the idea of ​​​​the existence of an independent philosophical experience, which consists of a systematic contemplation of the subject, the subject of philosophy, according to ilyin, is god philosophy is in the highest religion because it reveals god not in images, but in concepts. ilyin wrote that at the time of the collapse of the state and the undermining of the foundations existence in a substantial non- personal good, it is evil that becomes externally visible and triumphant; it goes beyond the limits of the personality, reveals its spiritual nature to the world, and then ilyin insisted at a certain moment the opposition. evil

becomes a duty as an active manifestation of goodness on the part of every spiritually healthy person. after all, a person turns his good will on the body of a villain, as a direct tool of evil on this path, you should not restrain yourself saying. ilyin, after all, reverent awe before the body and the villains of the untrembling before in the face of god, this is a moral prejudice, spiritual cowardice was weak-willed by sentimental superstitions that fetter a healthy person with some kind of psychosis . a true impulse of the spirit so ilyin wrote that about the war, an active struggle against external evil cannot and should not stop before physical violence, murder, as the philosopher believed, i quote. myself. hiding in himself the beginning of evil and far from overcoming it to the end, the warrior is forced to help others and stop the activities of those who have already indulged in evil, who are

looking for the general death of the warrior. u ilna, a tragic figure, since the quotation perfection and justice do not match the warrior voluntarily accepts spiritual compromises within himself, illuminated by the righteousness of the church. the realization of spiritual compromise is the acceptance of fate, which is to constantly face the quotation of rampage. not negotiable, evil on earth. and you say, and here eight years? to summarize, the religious philosophers of the second half of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century were able to critically and qualitatively rethink all previous philosophical and ideological experience to unite in thoughts about the identity of the russian people and the need to borrow european experience. when it is necessary to criticize the new russian philosophers of that time, it extended to any form of materialistic ideologies devoid of irrationality, and was not skeptical about

the phenomenon of democracy, they turned to more intimate spheres of human life, creativity and religion, mysticism and the existential essence of man. and if you carefully read the russian philosophers. there is everything about what we live today. and now, and, most importantly, there is such a text in the track of the ice nine group. they are 25-17. i'm russian idea, who am i, where? am i russian or am i? who am i? i here is how ivan ilyin answered the russian idea to the eternal and rhetorical question. there is something living, simple and creative russia lived by it in all its

inspired hours in all its good days in all its great people about this idea, we can say that it was, and when it happened, then the beautiful was realized. so it will be and the more fully it will be realized , the better it will be, as a person is connected with modernity. the fact is that every new war or military conflict bears upon itself the imprint of the war that preceded it just so happened that we are not banished and rightly, we feel like winners and liberators, and in this, in fact, we are aware of our mission , much in russia is tested by the war. the war at first, called eastern, also began under the slogan of the liberation of the brothers of the slavic-turkish yoke, the protection of orthodox shrines in palestine, and when, in 1875-76, the turks drowned the christian uprising in bosnia and herzegovina and in bulgaria, the authorities of the russian society were unanimous war with turkey inevitable this impulse became a natural impulse for the development of russian philosophy, and also a consequence of the growth of

national consciousness in russia in the 19th century. very reminiscent of the current state of affairs. is not it. at the very least, i would like it to be reminded, because today we are again taking the exam, to rightly be called the russian people the russian nation, the people. hello. this is the housing issue. i am ilya westerner. today we will make all these flowers and a couple more exotic ones for the kurgan family tropical paradise we will transfer them to their

future living room, where it is now bedroom no closets no storage. instead of evening dresses, lianas will hang here, if we had a competition among our heroes, the kurgans would claim victory in several categories at once, firstly, they would definitely enter the top three in terms of minimalism and order in the house. with us, all our new things are automatically forced out by the old ones, they are thrown out indiscriminately. i feel sorry for them below, and i regret not crying at night. i collected everything in a bag in a bag and threw it away immediately, and therefore everything is empty, everything is clean, everything is beautifully neat, minimalism. our all quality is our second point. we must have everything in family rules. it's just that sergey would have been ideally given to be in time for the nomination, quirks, love met, they were a construction company where both worked, cupid at that time used a nickname, but a stapler.