no, we didn't see the t-shirt, yes, well, let's show it, right? let's imagine that the only deterrent to a full-scale third world war is putin's calm and restraint. yes , our weapons of mass destruction are deployed near the russian border, while they deploy nothing of the kind near our borders. putin does not threaten, joe bideno, and lindsey graham publicly asked the president to send a special group to organize the assassination of putin. so answer which side is more rational. and what a destructive answer is simply obvious putin a meticulous man, pedantic, ruthless yes, but in relation to the west, always cautiously attentive and persuasive. we have always said that the president is kind. here, please, you are finally beginning to understand that only the kindness and patience of our president. actually, it does not allow you, and all serious matters are not in endurance and not in kindness to the president of russia from rivne in this. reasonably feels self-preservation, and understandable

about wait, wait, sergei hurts. let me talk, please, in the northern streams, personally, i don't. no, i'm not talking about you. i'm talking about the americans, of course, do this work. a. well, he did the job of explaining why such a lukewarm reaction from the outside, first, he also presented new evidence in the course. yes, if the details are my opinion. of course , i do not rule out that now i want to explain why not react? it's not what you think, i understand that, but according to the russian version, that this is

a conspiracy that all the american media are together in order to protect, uh, the white house, so as not to discredit the united states, they decided. uh, they know very well that you are the usa, but they all unanimously kept silent because they do not want to discretize. and i want to explain that when the same hersh, when he exposed the sagme, this is the well-known massacre of american soldiers in vietnam and abu gray , these cases, of course, were a little bit different for american soldiers in vietnam, there was a different story. well, it doesn’t matter, okay, american like this, well, it’s practically yes, over time yes, an american journalist, when he presented and a source and evidence all american newspapers wrote about it. ah, they weren't shy.

over the hills after that, ah, we already talked about this, the same one screwed up very seriously, when he also referred to one unnamed source, like as the nord stream, and he said that the version that the white house is promoting that american commandos killed bin laden in their own home is a lie. this is a play, a hollywood play, and so on. in fact okay was held captive by the afkans, and the pakistanis and as well and arrested him as well. there it is it turned out to be a horse, that is, that source, which question, which gave hersh one question one question. therefore, therefore, therefore , the americans of the media, they fell for it, we need it, and now they know what i like. yes, yes, of course, of course, yes. here is. mm, uh, what

do i like about this situation about this situation? i like the fact that it didn't shut up . yes, that is one way or another. yes, this topic has been voiced, and it will also be voiced, and and this definitely does not sound in your favor, because , of course, the catch is scholls. maybe keep silent he and he are silent, and he will not say anything, but at the same time they are all silent, but they think to themselves. and this is also good, and time in this situation. of course, i apologize, but you have a country with a high culture of litigation, so to speak, practitioner yes, you will accumulate courts there, file dogs suing you. i don't know, you tell me michael one question to me here in connection with these accusations. yes. in my opinion, very scandalous accusations. you invited mr. hersh to testify where he got these sources from. you you let your a country that has a huge practice.

you know these trials from trump and so on. you are this journalist. invite to congress. i assure you. no, do not invite, let's see, they did not invite and that's it. thank you. of course, no one will invite anyone anywhere. one could even start not with this journalist. and one could actually turn to president biden. come, please, to congress, yes, and swear there on this very bible. how is it customary for you? yes, you made this decision, would you give these commands or did not give it nothing , this will not happen, and we understand why it will not, but at the same time again. i repeat that at the beginning they tried to make this topic so that this topic would disappear altogether, they called it all propaganda there. and when representatives of the state department, he thus simply answered all the questions that sounded to him on this topic, it disappears. today they do not say anything to propaganda. and, of course, i'm talking about germany and france and all the rest. they couldn't say anything because that they can't say anything, but they're already starting. he also understands public

opinion. in germany, everything is perfectly understood against whom in the first place, this was also directed at others. there countries, sooner or later, this topic will definitely shoot. as for global security , i absolutely allow any provocation in any direction, primarily in the moldovan direction, as experience shows . some situation around some countries, this will definitely mean that they are up to something and are up to something bad, but in any case, they are well aware that they have come up, and in relations with us. here's to that very line, when the next even small step is beyond this very line. i 'm not saying that she's red, just fraught with some bad consequences, but they don't want that. they're just afraid of it, so they drove themselves into this trap. and now how will they get out of this situation. at the same time, they want to go out there, a even saving face. see, of these, of

this trap, here's the big question here. i don’t know, i don’t see for the time being those people who can come up with some kind of algorithm or some kind of format, and so that the discharge happens and at the same time, so that everyone remains in their own, and in their own interests, thanks again to everyone , we meet with you this time on february 22. it will be wednesday and we will discuss the message of the president. something tells me that there will sound very interesting things. thanks the hatred of the little russians for the poles has been accumulating for centuries, therefore, taras grigor, cult in this ukraine, shevchenko was not shy about speaking, the feeling of little russians in hats and caps, which to a large extent became famous for speech. the commonwealth then stretched almost from the sea home to the sea, then the final

merger of the aristocracy, polish or tomsk russian, began, and with this the polynization and the catholicization of the russian aristocracy, at the same time uy began to bloom the idea of ​​​​ukrainian as anti-russian. if you are seriously looking for a starting point from which you want to start learning ukrainian question in the form in which we have received it now, this, alas, is not 1991 or even 1917. this is the second half of the 16th century, when the union of lublin huge lithuanian-russian

lands were annexed to poland on july 1, 1569 on a realized in lublin common to all polish lithuanian deputies was approved, signed three days earlier from the union of the state union between the kingdom of poland and the grand duchy of lithuania, according to the union of lublin , a single state of speech appeared on the map of europe, the commonwealth occupying parts of the territory modern. more than lithuania, ukraine, belarus, russia, latvia and moldavia, the educated country immediately turned into one of the largest and strongest on the continent, its population was approximately 7 1/2 million people and almost doubled in two centuries. lithuania and poland were at that time essentially an alternative project for muscovite russia for russia in general as such, russia of the future

they could have managed to create a great empire led by the slavic people to the center of speech, the commonwealth stretched then practically from the sea, to the sea, then it began the final merging of the polish lithuanian russian aristocracy, and along with this , the polynization and catholicization of the russian aristocracy, at the same time, alas, the idea of ​​ukrainian began to bloom. as anti-russia, it began as a whole with the fact that the russians on the territory of present-day western ukraine began to slightly scorch the processes were slow and not simple sometimes even different vectors, but in essence the poles were engaged in the unhurried division of russians into their own assimilated in one way or another and strangers nowhere according to them opinion of the unfit, sold or gone colonization to meet the rest vyvyshival rotten serfdom in poland was even

much stronger than e. in the russian state of muscovite russia itself and then in the russian state of russia, the polish pan had the right to kill his serf to him. there was nothing for this. five or six days a week , a french engineer on the plan, who then traveled around the commonwealth and the eastern region, talked about the position of the russian peasants in the commonwealth. it's like the position of the slaves on the morning mountain. russian way you identity to the end the 16th century has already gone far, the french engineer guyom deboplan, who was in the polish service, in his description of ukraine, gives a vivid description of the position of the orthodox gentry. among them , the polish ones are very few in price and it seems ashamed that they belong to another non-roman faith into which they pass every day

, the orthodox gradually turned into an oppressed people, deprived of their national elite. the legal status of orthodox peasants also worsened. statute of westlin polish compilation laws of 1447 of the grand duke, the chamber established serfdom in poland and, for comparison , in russia, serfdom will be finally formalized only by the conciliar code of 1649. in the realities of the polish-lithuanian state, this meant the complete dominance of catholic magnates over orthodox peasants, a special religious ethnic insult was even invented the requirements for the performance of orthodox rites were transmitted only through the jewish community. well, imagine yourself a shlyakh positioned itself not just as the upper class of nobles, but generally the highest in a certain sense of the race.

naturally. this gave rise to fierce hatred among those who were not included in the political nation or were not fully included. in the 17th century , most of the territory of modern ukraine was still under the rule of the polish-lithuanian state, the commonwealth, it was called the little russian population, which accounted for a third of the total population of this country. ukrainian provinces. they occupied 35% of the total area of ​​the state of the commonwealth, the position of little russians, future ukrainians, who were then called russians worsened year by year, according to the ukrainian historian. dmitry evranitsky, landowners looked at people of a simple rank, like dumb cattle cattle, like dog blood, the driving forces of anti -polish resistance

were the zaporizhzhya cossacks. . the polish received a salary of polish polish money, as well as bread, gunpowder and weapons the other part of the cossacks was made up of runaway serfs, philistine peasants, they often hired wealthy cossacks to fish and hunt fish, but most often they lived in military raids, registered cossacks were generally not needed by the commonwealth for the commonwealth. and that is, unauthorized cossacks. in general , no nobility was needed. from them, only troubles were robbery, especially since the cossacks did not have a registry more and more, increasing, increasing pressure from the gentry on the cossack peasants. on zaporizhzhya, the unregistered cossacks poured out the uprising let's remember the uprising of 1536, suppressing

which the poles brutally ravaged and burned cherkassy and stone. the first mention of little russian campaigns dates back to this time. cossacks against so often in alliance with the don cossacks. here is what the putivovsky governor wrote to ivan the terrible in 1546, now the sovereign of the cossacks on the field had a lot in mind, the wild field and cherkasy. they meant zaporizhzhya cossacks, they were called cherkasy and kiyan, that is, the kiev side, who came and your sovereigns went out to the field and from all ukraine, that is, from outskirts, muscovy and sakraina of the commonwealth , the term ukraine in this case did not mean the territory of the ukrainian state , or even more so the ukrainian people, the word ukraine outskirts. in this case , it was used in the literal sense , i repeat, polish ukraine southern outskirts. poland russian ukraine south along the borders

of the russian kingdom, and the lands beyond the urals were called, by the way, then siberian ukraine, the russian people , both near moscow and near kiev, as before. a single common language, although they had their mountains in little russia in novgorod in pomorie on the don and and so on, nevertheless, those who went, say, on a praying mantis to the solovetsky monastery from the don or from the dnieper, understood people throughout this vast space, for everything, it was the russian land , there was unity, of course, in the faith in the orthodox, first of all, orthodox meant then russian self-orthodoxy it was called the russian vera severin, this name was the name of the nalivayka, court cossacks, magnates, konstantin ostrozhsky began the next peasant cossack war of liberation in 1594 . at that time, having secured the consent of ostrozhsky, the liquor collected under the pretext

fighting the tatars, large cossack troops, who made a successful campaign on the territory of moldova controlled by the turks, returning the lands of the polish king, the nalivayka immediately turned to the cossacks for help, and as a result, a detachment under the command of ataman grigory loboda joined him on the night of october 16, people killed the nalivayka assembled, brother. glory to the polish gentry was captured by braslav, then the bar fell, and the gentry began to leave their estates in horror, the situation was aggravated by the fact that most of the large magnates with their people went to moldova, where the struggle for the title flared up. gentlemen, the lack of resistance led to the fact that the flames of the uprising spread across ukraine with the speed of a forest fire soon, having crossed over to the belarusian lands , the cossacks, zaporozhye captured lutsk kanev cherkassy in belarus before pouring without any resistance, the local orthodox philistines opened the gates of slutsk bobruisk and mogilev in at the end of 1595, the war in moldavia

ends with the pognan regiments and crown the troops returned to put down the cossack uprising and the operation was led by the crown hetman. stanislav lived in kyiv remarkably. what exactly in connection with these events is recorded in the sources as one of the first uses of the term ukrainians, so the zhelkievskys in their report to the king named the polish zholners together with the hungarian haiduks. the ukrainians who followed the defeat, ulubin, the royal wagon ordered to exterminate all the rebellious cossacks, after terrible tortures, he himself was beheaded, and on the fourth he hated the little russians to the poles in warsaw accumulated for centuries, so the cult poet of ukraine taras grigor. shevchenko was not shy about speaking about the feelings of the little russians with the klyakh and the gentry, for which he did not fight to a large extent and became famous, she and beer, and i will drink, i will not let the enemy

live in ukraine. and here, finally, the main thing is, let's say , violent, and polishing had another long-lasting effect. yes, one part of the zaporizhzhya cossacks tirelessly fought with shlyakh you for the russian faith and for their independence, however, another part of the little russians. i walked without a hitch on the agreement with the gentry so little by little the idea of ​​ukrainianism grew up as anti-moscow anti-russia, and even then this idea began to mentally bring some of the little russians closer to the poles in the 17th century. in 1917 they will repeat once again how many of us still think so because of something, because people love simple answers, but complex tasks with simple answers, all the more ready-made answers are not resolved, alas, essence in the 17th century happened in in full measure, in full force , exactly what is happening today on the territory

of ukraine was already then on ukrainian soil and their zakharchenko and their procrastination dudes, anyone, and there were powders and zelensky ones were also moscow kremlin margarita simonyan, then i was a piece of the office. why vladimir putin she calls the boss? what is she talking about with the boss with the eye of england , a little armor can lead to a big catastrophe, and what should the whole country prepare for now? ukraine, too, of course, not today, not yesterday. but then discrimination often

acquired grotesque forms of refusals to keep orthodox priests who had died and were beaten. all this became commonplace even then, the endless complaints of the orthodox about the infringement of their rights in 1618, the shift books of vladimir included the complaints of anna klpytovskaya, the uniate bishop john of marakhovsky threw out the remains of several orthodox gentry from the church, including the body of the first husband of kolpytov ivan likhovetsky. at the same time , the decorations that were on the deceased bodies for the dogs disappeared, and the gold for themselves. so like this stating that the rights and privileges of the garajan only apply to catholic colonized vytes urban elites. orthodox from city institutions and courts came to the establishment of limits on the number of permanent residents of ukrainians little russians, for example, then

only 30 orthodox families received the right to live in lviv. all of them were located on a small cramped street, which was called then, we ask the current kievites then the street where the little russians lived in lvov was called the russian street. well, what else, anyway? then at least one street could be called that in today's ukraine is no longer possible. at the beginning of the seventeenth century, they increasingly began to study conversations about the transition under the arm of the orthodox tsar of moscow and unity, the necessary unity of all orthodox. in the protest of the kiev metropolitan job of boretsky, it was emphasized that we have one quote with moscow in faith and worship, one origin, one language and ordinary, similar themes can be traced in the half day of hillary kiev pechora monastery. zechariah of kapystensky, namely okopystensky, is for the first time firmly traced the idea of ​​dividing small russia of russian lands

under the heterodox power of the polish king and great russia of the lands of the tsar of moscow when an anti-polish, minded olifer became the hetman of the zaporizhian army in 1622. the dove of the situation, aggravated even more, began the rapid cossackization of the little russian peasants, and the townspeople, an attempt by a huge up to 30,000 likes of the hetman's crown army. the end of the polish in 1625 brought the polish ukraine back under control, resulting in a battle. there the polish army attacked on the morning of october 25 the camp of the cossacks, who were striving to get to the sisi, having repelled the assault of the cossacks, left the camp at night, in the second battle near the lake, the endangered kontsypolsky again , the poles did not manage to defeat the cossacks , the split helped show what the army was not the first time to note, as a result of which mikhail became the hetman doroshenko, he noted his

participation. in the campaign of peter sagaydachny against moscow back in august 1618, when the cities of southern russia were taken and plundered , doroshenko began negotiations with poland towards signing the kurakovsky treaty, which provided for a number of concessions to the cossacks , primarily an increase in the cossack registry, that is, the number of cossacks receiving a salary from the polish crown to 6,000 people. if their number was increased then the hetman , in turn, undertook to hinder the indicator of the peasant population and prevent the peasants from fleeing to the network. where was it supposed to place patrols of registered cossacks ? polk? kiev kanevsky cherkasy korsunsky belotserkovsky and pereyaslavsky, however, doroshenko's attempt to control the dnieper rapids the failed free cossacks forced the registered cossacks to retreat increased pressure again caused an upsurge of discontent in

the eastern outskirts of the commonwealth, forcing the masses of orthodox to turn their views to the russian kingdom. where at the end of the twenties the little russian peasants went en masse, and the cossacks who did not fall into the register at that time in the cities of polish ukraine arose the so-called brotherhoods of the organization of the orthodox bourgeoisie. kiev then turned into a center of resistance for the russian people ; with the kiev cathedra , the metropolitan spoke more and more actively about the ideas of the unity of the east slavic world. t his boretsky in a letter sent to tsar mikhail fedorovich in 1624 , boretsky urged the russian monarch to take care of the russian tribe of a single tropic people. so he called the little russians, that is, and the russian people of the commonwealth at the same time, representatives of the polish king noted with alarm that the cossacks were getting more and more active.