the whole orthodox world is praying by and large . well, nevertheless, we have what we have, as far as pacifists are concerned , some pacifist sentiments among those who can come to power. trumpists are not trumpists. i do not believe in any zepists at all, but of american origin, because we have already seen trump, in fact. and this is the same person who, well, i don't know, he's so very easy. you know, he called one leader of the state a man a rocket of another today, the next day he said that he was good the guy called another. there is still somehow an earthworm, and then again i say that he is a good guy, but a man who is ready to do anything and at the same time unpredictable, at least predictable. we understand perfectly well what we are dealing with, as to whether they will fly or not. i think that they will fly a different matter, which may be a little more careful and not as much as now. but what we do will depend on this, including a lot. and most importantly, will they finally believe that it's time to hit the brakes and somehow.

it's not time to lead the world away from this global catastrophe, we meet exactly in a week in this studio remembers that all participants in our program have their own truth well, we will always get to the bottom of the truth. today, sometimes one hears, if it weren't for the bolsheviks, there would be no ukraine. well, yes, ukraine might not exist, because if the bolsheviks ukraine would have been entirely part of poland, in fact, the soviet leaders nurtured all the small nations, all and if they tell us now that this is bad. we are calm answered no, not bad. this is good, because thanks to this, today we still have a huge russia, the largest country in the world, where 190 peoples live.

after the february revolution of 1917, the self-proclaimed central rada arose in ukraine, which took a progressive course towards independence in january 1918, the rada declared the independence of the ukrainian republic and unilaterally determined its territory, these were nine provinces. kyiv volyn podolsk chernihiv poltava yekaterinoslav kharkov kherson and tavria without crimea there is evidence that the chief of staff of the eastern front, general hoffman hoffman , of course, takes a lot of responsibility for declaring independence to representatives of the rada, but the participation of

the germans in the creation of the ukrainian project and the first version of ukrainian statehood does not come to be denied, on the other hand, to deny, ukrainian self-consciousness that developed during the 19th century is also impossible for 100 years. huge ukrainian literature was not created; the ukrainian theater named after taras and grigoryevich shevchenko became a cult, determining the attitude of the people around him. it had an almost religious connotation. he was perceived by the vast masses of the population as a prophet of ukrainians. in this sense , the bolsheviks faced a problem that already existed and covered both a part of the little russian political elites and a huge part of the priests of ukrainian origin, as well as ukrainian students. well, other segments of the population happened during the civil war. not everything is as good as planned. well, nowadays, too, not everything turns out right away as planned through the fault of all the same european partners, as and so on april 25, 1920 . let me remind you of the polish troops. we crossed

the western ukrainian borders throughout. having started the soviet polish war , the plans of the polish leaders were to capture the whole of ukraine and, as soviet diplomats expressed it, to transform it. in the colony of poland already created by it, that is, the government of poland eventually ceded the western regions of ukraine and belarus to poland . we got the left bank, the riga treaty, which ended the soviet-polish war on march 18, 1921, a joint russian-ukrainian delegation the fourth congress of soviets of ukraine adopted a decision on the entry of ukraine into the russian federation recently it was also said that the ukrainian republic and ukrainian nationality are an invention of the germans, meanwhile it is clear that the ukrainian nationality exists and the development of its culture is the duty

of the communists. you know who said this, comrade stalin at the tenth congress of the rpb, held in 1921, was held from march 8 to 16. today, sometimes one hears, if it were not for the bolsheviks, there would be no ukraine and no, it wouldn't. well, yes, ukraine might not exist, because if it weren’t for the bolsheviks, ukraine would have been entirely part of poland , ukraine, i repeat, would have been a polish colony, as it was before, by the way, which is why the foreign ministry is now comparing ukraine more with african banana republics. it is their subconscious that the poles see themselves as white colonizers, and these ukrainians. nigers, in fact, how else can they see the local population, if the local population worked hard for the gentry for many decades, the bolsheviks literally lured, dragged and stick and carrot the ukrainian population into the composition of the large russian population. far away,

not calmed down by march 1921, and local ukrainian comrades, realizing the moment actively bargained for their ukrainian preferences , this is the strength and weakness of russia russia is huge. and to keep the outskirts. russia from time to time goes to find or other cultural or political concessions. this is absolutely inevitable in april 1923, the 12th congress of the workers 'and peasants' party of the bolsheviks. declared indigenization as his official course in the national question in general in the national question. at the same time, the conference park of soviet ukraine makes personal decisions on the policy of ukrainization ukrainization in the 1920s in the early thirties was carried out, among other things, in the kuban and in the stavropol territory and in the kursk and voronezh regions of the rsfsr, and even in one of the regions of kazakhstan where they lived compactly in their ukraine yes, there was such a story

there is no need to hide it. they and we will tell today, including it is worth remembering. due to the fact that from ukraine incessantly there are voices about how they were oppressed. yes, by the way, ukraine was then given such a will, which they had never had before . what goal did the bolsheviks set for themselves, if you call a spade a spade, their goal is called expansion, they quickly drew most of the russian empire into the soviet union. and then they made, however, not always successful attempts to attack the neighbors, iran, turkey and, as we already remember, poland, that is, lenin in this sense. he wanted to go even further than the emperors and repair in moscow even those lands and cities that they never entered the russian empire, but in order to continue expansion, it was necessary to show other people the great attractiveness of the soviet project, the world then, if you forgot, consisted of colonies in

the world there were many times fewer states than today, let's say the british empire then occupied most of the modern india bangladesh pakistan and their pits. but if only the british empire were such a huge soviet one, the leaders wanted to lead the anti-colonial processes around the world, and they gave the world a sign. here, look how we we protect and nurture, for example, ukraine in fact, the soviet leaders nurtured all the small nations, all and if they tell us now that this is bad. we will calmly answer. no, not bad. this is good, because thanks to this , today we still have a huge russia , the largest country in the world, where 190 peoples live, but when the soviet power is young. undertook these unthinkable tasks, mistakes were, of course, inevitable, so in ukraine they tried their best so that the civil war would not happen again. and such

there was a danger and the stylish gang itself continued to roam the ukrainian steppes, that is, the soviet leaders wanted to take the little russian population as accomplices, we mov you, and you can blame the loyalty of the bolsheviks and stalin and the kaganoviches for mistakes, but at the same time you need to understand their motivations . they blinded the country again. they didn't separate it. and how could they? or her using improvised means, and they, of course, were no dumber than us long before the muscovite, the nagilyak, the slogan arose, goethe's view of moscow away from moscow, the slogan was widely used among the ukrainian intelligentsia even then that is why the multi-layered and deep, bolshevik ideology and political practice. all this worked to unite the incompatible and ukrainization and at the same time fight against ukrainian chauvinism. and this is where the fun begins. they hate

everything russian beautiful. but they did not grow up among us. well, of course, the traitor is the most natural murderous confession of the mother of an ordinary nazi in life, in short. in moscow, while her son is shooting at the defenders of donbass what happened in general, so that you can go shoot your own man comes up with thoughts of betrayal of the motherland when he considers his homeland something for himself, what will the father of the nazis answer? the head of ukraine

, lazar kaganovich, was subordinate to the bolshevik from volyn, alexander yakovlevich shumsky, who served as people's commissar of enlightenment of ukraine to soviet ukraine , relations between kaganovich and shumsky , to put it mildly, did not work out, shumsky wanted full and inevitable ukrainization. but kaganovich no, shumsky did not want to, realizing that he could not cope with kaganovich, he achieved authentication, stalin and complained to him about kaganovich , comrade, insek, stalin on april 26, 1926. written by the head of the ukrainian party organization. a letter to lazur onevich, in which he spoke in detail about how he sees the situation in the communist party of ukraine stalin, in a letter to kaganovich, reported that shumsky was dissatisfied with musk's attitude towards ukrainization at its pace. he believes stalin wrote that ukrainization is going hard . he looks at ukrainization as a duty

that is reluctantly performed with great delay at that time, stalin saw the problem as follows, i quote, it is possible and necessary to ukrainize observing. i wrote at a certain pace, stalin, but you can’t ukrainize the proletariat from above, you can’t force the russian working masses to abandon the russian language and russian culture and recognize ukrainian as their culture and language. this is contrary to the principle of the free development of nationality , stalin wrote that it would not be national freedom but a peculiar form of national oppression. he wrote, stalin it seems to me that comrade stalin described that comrade shumsky misunderstands ukrainization and does not considers this last danger, stalin was well aware that

, despite the naturalness of the process of ukrainization on the territory, what is happening must be observed most carefully, otherwise they will do this as an example, to put it mildly, excesses, stalin cited the works of the soviet ukrainian poet and publicist mikulakh, a strong-willed brightest supporter ukrainian kharkiv resident and strong-willed was actually a wick. nikolai grigorievich filev. he was the son of a nobleman. grigory alekseevich fitilev in the family, fitilev spoke v language well, this happens when russian people go crazy and change their identity to some other one, starting, while all russians dislike the most famous now-strong-willed ukraine or malarus with a question mark, the nation, in his opinion, only then can culturally manifest himself, if he finds his own way of development, and until recently he did not write, the laudatory ukrainian intelligentsia. she followed the russians culturally and praised, believed that

ukrainian culture should not be guided by russia, it should be guided by europe i quote from russian literature from its style and ukrainian poetry should run away as quickly as possible. here is what he wrote. then their strong-willed , namely laudatory, was the author of the slogan away from moscow, children are in moscow, and now stalin met the requirements of strong-willed. they are slow de-russification of the proletariat in ukraine, its opinion that ukrainian poetry should run away from russian literature from its style and as soon as possible. his statement that the ideas of the proletariat are known to us even without maskov’s art, his passion for some kind of messianic the role of the ukrainian young intelligentsia is its ridiculous and non-marxist policy to tear culture away from politics. all this and much like it in the mouth of the ukrainian communist. sounds more than strange now. he said that stalin had not yet curtailed ukrainization.

by july 1926, in state institutions of ukraine , the percentage of office work in the ukrainian language reaches 65%, while at the beginning of the previous year there were only 20% of office work in ukrainian. the lower school was 80% ukrainianized. press by 60%. nevertheless, by that time the language of tarasov shevchenko ivan franko was unknown to most ukrainian officials. in kiev, a test of knowledge of the ukrainian language showed that in 26 institutions out of 6,000 employees, only 28% of employees knew the ukrainian language, there were those in ukraine who openly called the ukrainization of petliurism or counter-revolution and categorically refused to learn the native language , stating that in case of pressure, we would stop working on ukraine and move to moscow, everything was difficult. it infects, tears the voice and nerves

, beats per minute cannot be counted, leads to a creep give goosebumps for a fever. we are all sick of football, fill the stadium with football, meet the new season on the form of a fan card for public services. common crawl en the pastor's last word unique footage from the personal archive of an adept in the siberian sect, where people were turned into obedient puppets of combat nlp techniques and dominant hypnosis . no, i will already wash his lord's testicles secret video experiments in a self-taught hypnologist on his followers. footage

of the collapse of the last sect in modern russia andrey kunitsyn’s author’s project, a person with rights on sunday at 16:20 on ntv let’s repeat once again that the corinization was carried out not only in ukraine, it was carried out everywhere , this does not mean that the disenfranchised ukraine with all its diverse population was taken and began to format no complex processes were going on all over to the soviet union, just in ukraine , korinization was called ukraineization for obvious reasons. in general, the idea was to provide all peoples with the opportunity to learn to read periodicals and books in their own languages, to communicate in official authorities also in their native language. the people who did not have a written language, mainly in the caucasus in central asia in siberia, this song was created

by total ukrainization, let alone russification. stalin did not plan the main idea for the organization. it consisted in the fact that everyone could interact with the authorities in a language understandable to him to receive education and develop his national culture. alas, in reality, it turned out that most of the ukrainianizers were nationalists; the ukrainian most moderate did not object to further to remain part of the soviet union, while desiring to receive maximum benefits for ukraine and ukrainian culture , the most radical saw their goal, not only the separation of ukraine from russia, but also a merciless struggle against the masks of ukrainization was for them a convenient way to spread their ideas, one way or another, ukrainization was intensively carried out in life for 10 years from 1923 to 1933 was completely stopped only in 1938 when they saw how local russophobes seized the moment and began to use the ideas from

the film adaptation as an opportunity to destroy everything russian stalin process began to slow down from 1929 to 1933, a wave of arrests of ukrainian party leaders swept and a variety of creative very active. some intellectuals, like mikhail grushevsky , did not begin to arrest, but simply recalled to the center away from ukraine, the bulk continued to talk softly, and sometimes even went forward, for example, on february 12, 1929 . stalin had a historic meeting with a group of ukrainian writers, very influential and prominent figures, mykytenko and tesnyak. head of the head of art petrenko levchenko, the head of the agitation industry, the head of the writers' union of ukraine, ivan kulik, is actually. however, israel south lievich. kulik , instead of the expected conversation about literature , the content of the meeting was reduced to two requirements that were not entirely literary. the first is to give

ukraine the kursk and voronezh regions. the second is to ban the play. bulgakov not a vanity for what, because, according to the visitors, the play was anti-ukrainian and covered in a caricature where the struggle of ukrainians for independence under the leadership of hetman skoropadsky and then petliura to admit that bulgakov really ridiculed the forced film adaptation. remember how i would have shouted at your hetman senior turbines, for the organization of this pretty ukraine i would have hung the first high live vilno ukraine vitkiev half a year before berlin. he mocked the russian officers, mocked all of us. who banned the formation of the russian army. a hetman who terrorized the russian population with that infamous language, which hetman does not even exist in the world. who spread all this scum with tails on the heads of the hetman. end quote the persecution of bulgakov's colleague was very fierce,

then ukrainians or, let's say, professional ukrainians. like, israel lyudovich. kulik was played here, and meanwhile , stalin fought off bulgakov from the delicacy from ukraine as best he could, and i’ll tell you - stalin answered, from the point of view of the viewer, i’ll say the days of turbines are the greatest demonstration in favor. all the crushing forces of bolshevism, excuse me, i cannot demand from a writer that he must be a communist and must necessarily carry out the party point of view for fiction. need other standards, non-revolutionary and revolutionary soviet not soviet proletarian not proletarian now this is not suitable to demand that it is impossible to have a communist literature. well, wasn't steel a democrat. he wanted the best, but people are such people, and if they only wrote denunciations, if they only poisoned bulgakov. they treated the entire russian-speaking population of ukraine and in 1933 these

processes were resolved. suspend. sometimes this is associated with collectivization, they say, too many mistakes were made in ukraine and therefore they decided there is no stopping ukrainization either. no, it has nothing to do with collectivization. we are sure that this was due to the coming to power of hitler in january 1933. stalin clearly understood. how the flirting with ukrainian nationalists can end, and moreover , i guessed it in this direction that they will subsequently be pulled, alas, to fight the excesses of ukrainian nationalism. stalin began extremely hard. we mentioned here several names of shumsky, we will cite them as an example of how their fate turned out. on may 13 , 1933, shumsky was arrested on charges in belonging to the ukrainian military organization and on september 5 he was sentenced to

the collegium of the gpu for 10 years in the solovetsky camp in 1935. the imprisonment in the camp was replaced by exile to krasnoyarsk in september 1946 by the nkvd under the leadership. pavel sudoplatov. he was taken out of krasnoyarsk on september 18. in saratov, on the way to kiev, he was killed at the suggestion. all the same lazarus, kaganovich makkolakh, strong-willed back in the late twenties , was rigidly worked out, as a quote , a representative of the counter-revolutionary bourgeois nationalism, the literary organizations of the valerists were dispersed by the hounded painfully, experiencing the arrests of ukrainian violent nationalists like him. in 1933 . volevoy committed suicide in a suicide note. he wrote, for which i do not understand anything terribly painful. long live socialist construction long live the communist party. well, why nikolai grigorievich, because you didn’t understand the most important thing, it was the russian socialist revolution, russian communism.

he gave all rights and all opportunities to everyone peoples, but this did not mean at all that it was necessary to trample on russian culture and humiliate it, as well as to humiliate the russian language, as such , in the final one cannot but recall those mastodons of russophobia, to whom we today owe a special military operation, and about whom stalin is already understood in the mid-thirties, namely the ukrainian nationalists, who suffered a complete defeat in the civil wars. they left the soviet state and mastered in western ukraine those who fell under the rule of pan poland. there they collected the basis of the structure was named in the late twenties by the organization of ukrainian nationalists ; now it is banned on the territory of russia. the leader of the mind, a former colonel of the austrian army yevgeny konovaltsev. or konovalets, an old german spy with many years of experience, after hitler came to power, the aunesses began to enjoy the official support of the german authorities. in the early thirties,

the auun people committed several terrorist attacks against the employees of the soviet consulate in lvov in 1935 by the soviet security agencies. we decided to inflict on the terrorists. counter attack. wow, he infiltrated the secret officer of the nkvd , the same pavel anatolyevich sudat, he managed to achieve a friendly disposition of the power end and during one of the secret meetings in a cafe in a dutch city. rotterdam here. platov planted a time bomb on the godfather of ukrainian nationalism . after the death of konovalets , a serious struggle began between his followers, but two deputies andriy melnyk and the direct organizer of the un military structures, a former student of lviv university stepan, claimed the leading role. bandera what was next? do you remember bandera immediately set about organizing ukrainian auxiliary units under the fascist army, then bandera created a special-purpose battalion called nahel nightingale commanded by bandera’s faithful associate sotnik roman shukhevych, then the battalion took the oath, probably from