what dmitry just talked about, if they really need such a war in order to solve their own economic problems. and then, of course, nothing will convince them, nor our placement. our tactical weapons are there. there they will try to bring belarus to this matter anyway, but they cannot but understand that if they say, or rather plan to unleash some kind of nuclear war with tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of europe, this does not mean at all that they will succeed. and where is the guarantee, who can to give a guarantee that this war will not turn into a war with the use of strategic nuclear weapons, they will not be able to sit out there somewhere, i don’t know, across the oceans. no one today, in our time in our world , can give such a guarantee. therefore, if i were them, and if i were in their place , i would still think very strongly about what is happening in lavria. i don't know. i'm pessimistic. i think that it will not be possible to defend. i believe that they will do what they planned anyway. i mean. here

these demons who are now in charge of ukraine well, this is a must and it will backfire in a different way , it simply cannot be. all. thanks again. everyone see you in a week in this studio. remember that all participants in our program have their own, the truth will forever get to the bottom of the truth. unlike today's kiev in the 17th century, everyone in ukraine understood that in moscow , the heirs of vladimir yaroslav and the russian authorities are sitting there in moscow. but who cares about their own mythology in ukraine now. now they have everything, on the contrary, national heroes, they throw it in the trash, and judas magnify the kingdom

of crooked mirrors so, in 1654, that same great reunification of ukraine with russia took place , in fact, to be more precise, the transfer of the registry of the zaporizhzhya army and part of the territories of modern ukraine under its control of the ghetton. the so -called russian citizenship. in our country , sometimes it’s not entirely correct to begin to draw maps of what has reunited with russia and say that they say this was ukraine , just nothing. in this case, we are deceiving ourselves, of course we are reunited with what we were able to reunite with then, and little russians lived, but in much larger areas just to the rest of the territories. we could not reach then, and this process has grown for us for many many decades, the attitude of the small-born elite to reunification was

not always unambiguous. no. they did not yet know that they were a representative. and that the ukrainian people , moreover, did not know about this in the world, no one at all. the inhabitants of ukraine were then russians and were considered russians and considered themselves russians, but these inhabitants of the future ukrainians had already formed their own cossack elite top. and so difficulties arose with it, because any elite at all times begins to break away from its people and consider itself superior to the people and pass off its desires as the desire of the whole people, which is why a huge long russian-polish war was started then, in which they fought against moscow not only the poles, but the future ukrainians themselves, as well as the crimean tatars and european mercenaries, ukrainian modern historiography puts in the list of glorious

ukrainian historical events, of course , not our great reunification, but the battle of konotop, which happened just 5 years after the reunification on june 28, 1659, near the city of konotop, besieging the fortress of the russian army under the leadership of prince alexei trubetskoy, opposed the arriving coalition troops, which was organized by hetman ivan vyhovsky, who was oriented towards the commonwealth , were part of the coalition, which constituted the main strike group of the crimean tatars , loyal to the igovsky part of the zaporizhzhya. cossacks, polish detachments and mercenaries from different european countries well, almost like now, only now the crimean tatars are for us. so the coalition is under konotop defeated the russians in present-day ukraine , some are still happy, how did the muscovites get sick at the great battle of konotop.

they are now ready and just forget leningrad forever and about borodino but he remembers this fight, but what is important for us to understand here ? ukrainian, pobeda poltava colonel. pushkar wrote such a surname, then in moscow about the attitude towards vyhovsky in the cossack environment, vygavsky did not they want and do not believe him in anything psalm, because he is not a natural zaporozhye cossack, but taken from the polish army. end of quote bykovsky, who had already won under the konotop, did not become a favorite among the cossacks and was considered a legend because of a stranger he was considered an enemy, and he tried to assert his power by repressions against the cossacks, he executed the famous zaporizhzhya colonels, and nikienko suleymenko and the gunner above named, and you the state committee also wrote then that where he executed and

hanged everyone who was against him, and further a quote from many cossacks with their wives and children. gave in crimea tatars end date, however, the will of the zaporizhzhya cossacks judas vygovsky did not break it was then that the legendary ataman spoke on the side of moscow. zaporizhzhya ivan serko, which we talked about not so long ago , is characteristic that in ukrainian national mythology serko was a hero for many centuries, but vyhovsky was not. well, who cares about their own mythology in ukraine now. now they have everything, on the contrary, national heroes, they throw it in the trash, and judas magnifies the kingdom of crooked mirrors already on september 11 1659. vygovsky, the very winner of the russians, was displaced by the zaporizhzhya cossacks themselves and fled today any ukrainian. ask when they first beat, and the children are under the pump, but i think most do not know that they themselves are zaporozhye.

the cossacks hated the triumphant vygovsky, because he brought the crimean tatars and killed the legendary colonels, and for that he was deposed a month and a half after that, as it were , legendary victory, he fled in the same family , according to the sources of that time and his current follower wish the same. but let's just introduce a fair one and hide nothing in this complex conversation of problems . why, for a variety of reasons, under the blow of the horde, the russian lands disintegrated several hundred years before the reunification yes, not all ties were broken. yes, people moved from place to place, had fellowship and the church prayed to one saint and orthodoxy strengthened, split into several parts of the people, but

yet 400 years have passed, think 400 since the bots took kiev, not even 30 years, as today 400 and 200 years have passed since the ukrainian lands were occupied. lithuania was then, however, quite a russian-speaking lithuania and 100. it has passed since ukraine became part of the commonwealth during this time, certain changes in character and language have been developed, some differences of which, under vladimir the red sun and under yaroslav the wise, of course, were not on the one hand by itself. this past was the strongest magnet. unlike today's kiev in the xvii century. in ukraine, everyone understood that the heirs of vladimir and yaroslav are sitting in moscow and the russian power is there in moscow, that is , no one stole anything from the little russians of the 18th century, just the dynasty following the ruriks, but

their relatives sat in moscow and ruled from there. and if the russian spirit has been preserved in you and has not been blown away by the steppe winds, then you will come to your russian tsar, because it is your tsar and your dynasty that was then understood on the territory of present-day ukraine. but these are high categories. and on the other hand, there is life, there is life, and in life and in everyday life it was difficult to tell that there were class boundaries in little russian society by the 17th century. haven't settled yet. remember, there were registered zaporizhzhya cossacks, real, serving the polish king and not registered fake at first the gentry suffered with non- registered cossacks who did not obey her. and now, after the reunification , moscow's turn has come to suffer with the spawning rune of the cossacks, moscow since it has accepted malarossia into russia under the lan of the russian tsar decided to conduct a census there, little russians began

to conduct a census, and little russian peasants. everyone strove to enroll in the cossacks. it turned out that there, in general, only solid cossacks, the cossacks, after all, need to pay a salary, and the peasants feed the state, and the peasants ended up in little russia, few solid cossacks, in addition, the new hetman of moscow, the approved ivan bryukhovetsky, collected. under these, first on yourself, and then on the russian tsar. well, such a ukrainian says, they came to the russian tsar in their will to work hard as a result, twice as much as before and on bryukhovetsky, in order to work hard on the russian tsar, the russian tsar most likely did not know about these circumstances , there were questions for bryukhovetsky, but no matter how they went on the territory of little russia, the unrest of some in the cossacks is not recorded, but in others three skins are pulled in 1667. after a long war with the poles for the ukrainian lands, we concluded the andrusov truce, the cunning poles immediately began to spread rumors that after the census , moscow ordered a quote from the initial people to be whipped about

all of them, but to bring captivity. well, that is all to cross the zaporizhzhya foreman, and to temper the rest of the inhabitants and the small-born, the population believed all this, the russian sagittarius put there for service complained about the unsteadiness of the local population. in the morning, the locals love muscovites, and by the evening they start a new rumor, and they are all upset already. however, i repeat once again, while there was no purely ukrainian ideology at that time, people who had fallen out of the russian world were concerned that they would be returned to the russian world on an equal footing. it would be better if they paid extra for the return well, what's wrong with that, meanwhile , the russian diplomat alone on shchekin wrote to the russian tsar alexei mikhailovich that the cherkassy cities taken from poland did not give any profit, and the losses from them were large. please note that the russian diplomat called the same, in order

to be immediately clear, these cities are cherkasy , not russian, but not ukrainian, of course, and even more so not polish cherkasy cherkasy. that is, those where they lived, cherkassy , ​​that is, little russians, that is, the future of ukrainians. well, that is, ukrainians, well, the hetman of bryukhovetsky during the next unrest, the zaporizhzhya cossacks, literally torn apart and killed. the very form of the subordination of ukrainian society to the tsarist power grabbed its head and demanded an understanding of a huge amount of work. so, in any case, the attempt of direct voivodship control at that time failed after the death of bryukhovetsky over the left bank, the power of the right-bank hetman petro doroshenko was practically established, who played his complex game trying not to surrender to the power of the commonwealth and somehow unscrew with moscow, in short, doroshenko tried to pursue a multi-vector policy, but at the same time, you know, what was especially exciting then for future ukrainians was that the russian tsar, who had come to us under the andrusov treaty

, would give up cues. calm down dear brothers. at that time, russian governors were sitting in five ukrainian cities in kiev, pereyaslavl; now it is the city of pereyaslav, borispol district, kiev region of ukraine in chernihiv, in nizhyn, this is a city in the chernihiv region of ukraine and sharper than oster is another city in the chernihiv region, but powers reduced their materiality and so on. well, in terms of the hetman's powers. at the same time, the majority of the population did not even think about leaving moscow; they returned home, they took root in the new state body. this process is not easy, but it went on and on. generally. successfully it infects, it tears the voice and the nerves cannot be counted beats per minute, it starts to creep up to goosebumps for a fever. we are all

football wars. valei football at the stadium, welcome the new season. apply for a fan card at state services.ru evgeniy markulis vs. anatoly wasserman whose erudition is limitless and whose teeth are victorious, he turned out to be a normal person. it's just not bad, i know how to guess a lot, whether it's saving me this question, i'm pretty hesitant. i'm taking the money of the game of minds the premiere of a new intellectual show tomorrow 15:20 on ntv and the most important thing at that time for 1.669 years , no

ukrainian and ukrainian separatism was listed in any document from the zaporizhzhya kazakh foreman. in general, they still didn’t think in these concepts and categories, whether they liked moscow or not always i liked it just didn't think. they quite calmly and consciously understood their rus, and on the left bank and to the right, more carefully, they bargained for preferences, but this was not a trade of the ukrainian sub-ethnos with another ethnic group. it was a policy of social trade, and even doroshenko, who was waving his tail in all directions to moscow until he entered the clinic, was zealously writing off the forms of management and interaction. i wish in my heart the long-standing intention that little russia be bought. like great russia, one font brothers. useless love and a fraternal union always led on that there was a single font brotherhood, even doroshenko called russians and

little russians. i even repeat doroshenko with whom we had very big problems at that time, because no matter how that doroshenko twirled and twisted his tail. he still was not an idiot, and how things really were in history. he knew, then he knew, unlike the current ones, they were not wild people, they remembered their history, although there were almost the same number of years about those times of the dardyn invasion. how many now from us to the 17th century, but one should not think that then people were forgetful without remembering them today. it is in today's ukraine that their cretins manage to prove that there are fair-haired and rus with one s and there is russia with two with this. as they say, different things are utter nonsense, which i repeat once again, even for doroshenko did not exist in those days. yes, the moscow governors

sometimes irritated future ukrainians against the moscow governors, they even rebelled, but the russian tsar was an authority, indestructible gogol about this wrote, taras bulba, and he did not come up with these passages about the loyalty of the zaporozhians to the russian tsar , these passages were components of the little russian self-consciousness of gogol's childhood, wait , he wrote. gogol the time will come, the time will come to know, you already know what the orthodox russian faith is and now people far and near are smelling their king rises from the russian land and there will not be a force in the world that would not submit to him in google and he himself lived this paradox, which is a paradox and not is gogol mercilessly scoffed at the russian governors and governors. and the king is true loved and here the key question arises. and who then did the same doroshenko want to be when, in moments of crisis, he wanted to fall away from the russian tsar.

here, of course, he didn’t want to be any ukraine and didn’t know how to think about it and didn’t even know such words, he dreamed of being the head of the russian republic as part of the commonwealth well, in order to maintain power and not obey the russian governors, but also the russian name to keep his own too, because without the russian name , the orthodox little russians at that time would simply be russians doroshenko to him and would not obey became, because doroshenko himself didn’t have any other name then , yes, and there will never be doroshenko, as you know, he also later recognizes the russian tsar and dies in russia and then an interesting moment arises, because not all cossack hetmans were, in fact, russian , for example, bogdan khmelnitsky was an orthodox gentry and , in fact, was a representative of the gentry sarmatian people, as it was then called, but the paradox, speaking to the polish government or sim, bogdan khmelnitsky spoke on behalf of the russian people, so he is called back in 1649, responding to the claim

of the polish senate, who demanded that khmelnitsky not protect the serfs. khmelnitsky replied with a quote i'll beat the russian people out of izlyash. captivity in 1649 in the xviii century, not some such speeches could not surprise anyone, because russian rus, russians in relation to the future ukrainians are full of historical documents, and then not only in moscow documents. they appear as russians, but also in polish and in internal zaporizhzhya correspondence, yes, the farther, the more kazakh elders have. nikolai feeling that moscow russians and they are little russian and russians are kindred russians, having one tsar and one faith, but, as it were, slightly different russians, they sing differently and dress differently and even think a little differently. yes, this will not offend anyone in russia , otherwise many of us here just rush to be offended about and the demon felt

the cossack foreman in the 17th century, and in some way. we admit they were right 400 years after the capture of ikeev and a hundred years as part of the commonwealth. well, this is not a joke. true, this is not even the current 30 years, i repeat the independence of ukraine is a serious period. we have children of russian immigration of the first wave of russians from russians after 100 years in russia, in fact, to return. for the most part, they couldn’t when perestroika began, remember, they are russian, but something inexplicable here in russia has changed habits, manners of voice, something else has changed, and they didn’t come here, most of them, i don’t say that this is the difference. with ukraine it is insurmountable, we have come to terms with this difference. and even became related to her in the end. this is our wealth people the same root with us, and who developed their own mythology, partly, partly their own costume. partly my kitchen my song my mind. this must be taken into account. yes, we russians were lucky , the russian tsar then chose first vladimir then moscow and began to rule from there. and we are

russians by right. and they were in the center before coming. the hordes have found themselves on the periphery of those times. it was early they had joined to be. maybe it even overgrown with burrows, it was one thing when we were hemmed to them, and another thing when they were hemmed to us and driven to them from moscow of the moscow voivodeship administration and began to appoint during the census. here you will go to the cossacks, and you will go to chern and to chern. well, and so on and so forth, it must be taken into account. it is not necessary to hush it up with this , the one who works must work, he corrects the situation, corrects both illness and misfortune. pain, and whoever says that there is nothing of this and never was, he will never win. as for the newest ukrainian mythology with these russians, with one of which are actually ukrainians and russians with two, with which moskans are actually muscovites, then these are the people who came up with this simply do not

want to work with their own historical sources, firstly, dear brothers and non-brothers of kiev. remember in the correspondence of the ukrainian hetmans and petitions of the second half of the 18th century, the word rus meant both the ukrainian belarusian lands and all the territories of ancient russia, including moscow and novgorod lands. and others too in your own documents. i say that's what the word means. russia was called the whole territory, secondly, natives of moscow russia in your own documents of the 18th century is called both russians with one of them and russians with two of them in general. a mirror situation is also observed in the papers written by the moscow administration. they could name cities. a local resident behind the defeat could be called karkassky, but even more often it was said about the inhabitants of the future ukraine, it was in the papers. just like about russian people, moreover, with one s, then with two s, all these,

invented in the 20th century. in kiev, back in canada , supposedly the same patterns - this is ukrainian two of them are russian - this is anti-historical bullshit, which is not confirmed by anything in 1657 . the ambassador of the zaporizhian army, losing, repeated to the russian tsar, pursued your royal majesty jacob the second great tsar and equal to the apostles vladimir not exactly honors, but also prefers it, he felt the first, actually russian tribe deep into the depths of nasty idolatry and darkness. anciently immersed in saints. enlighten baptism now translate into modern russian. we wrote he prefer your royal majesty because you are the heir of vladimir who is still in ancient times. our russian tribe was led out of idolatry into baptism by the motive of returning from vladimir’s lost in litvinism and shlyakhin possession to another russian tsar alexei mikhailovich

. she was the very zaporizhzhya side invited to moscow , they themselves explained why they came under the power of moscow and this theme is repeated from the documents of the documents. they wrote. we went back there where we're supposed to be. they themselves thought so of the generation of the russian application. this is how the little russians called themselves in petitions, from document to document there was a constant emphasis on orthodoxy more than the single faith and the single cross. in this context. it should be mentioned that the most powerful neo-pagan trends, which have already embraced the current ukraine latently, seem to tear up a possible meeting with the memory of the truth of ukraine. true ukraine laruse, once sewed itself with russia anew through ethnic and religious indisputable kinship, where orthodoxy begins. there reunification inevitably follows, so

now they are being undertaken. whatever attempts to break all these ties, pagan attempts, sectarian nazi anti-soviet whatever, but no matter how hard you try, alas, and oh, what is written with a pen cannot be cut down with an ax in a letter from alexei mikhailovich of 1654, hetman bogdan khmelnitsky calls the inhabitants ukrainian lands. bend your fingers with the people of russian pious christian times , the orthodox russian world two with two, by the way, the christian russian world three bogdan khmelnitsky and all the russian zaporizhzhya cossacks insisted that when little russia was accepted into russia , the title of alexei mikhailovich appeared that he was the tsar of not only great russia but also small russia, this was certainly a request for tribute, but it was also an installation that the removed part was special , deserving special mention and

included in no way an accidentally lost piece of land. how about on your own?