we collected a database of information about our citizens, then they live there and register them in the system of the so-called personalized registration. yes, we have such a system, and we have already actively engaged in this for more than 3 million people, our citizens have registered there. and then , gradually , the world of social support began to appear as soon as the regulations were adopted, for example, from january 1 of the current year. we got up there to assign a single allowance to families, and now in new regions in our four subjects, already 115,000 children receive such an allowance. this year alone , about 16,000 certificates have already been issued. this is where the maternal cadet is born, and since march 1. pension legislation has already entered into full force there, and we have begun to assign russian pensions at the current time as well. you know, for a month and a half it is literally possible to assign 70,000 pensions there in our new russian regions and we will gradually. there is a transitional period in the law during the year to appoint them and transfer them to russian canadianism. this is very important for us so what are the social measures support is supposed to what is called the families

, uh, participants in, uh, special military operation participants in the social military operation are also, of course, a very important circle for us , people, yes, whom we provide and with whom we work. here i would like to note that, of course, a larger world of social support is provided through the line of law enforcement agencies, this is understandable. logically. well, the social fund appoints the most. the main thing from our point of view. these are the so-called monthly cash payments to war veterans. these are our duties, we assign them, and also in some cases. we provide, and citizens with means of rehabilitation with technical means of rehabilitation, and here, of course, we have an unequivocal attitude, and for each family for each such participant in a special war operation. we have a personal person fixed in the region where he lives, in order to fully, and to monitor and help him get what is also necessary for us unconditionally. priorities sergey thank you very much for the conversation always kirill thank you very much.

hello in russia decade of science and technology the ntv television company and the state corporation rosatom present a program on how science will change our lives in the next 10 years. i am vladimir antokhin. i am ekaterina shugaeva. in 10 years, the rules of the road will not be needed happily said, she finally had to add more. yeah well, i don't know. i still invited optimists who believe that in 10 years the rules of the road . they really won't be needed. this is sergey shugaev, by the way, a lawyer. good evening. morph systems and artificial

intelligence i imagine how we will drive without rules. here i am somehow for a motorist against. well, according to tradition, skeptics denis zagarin - car testers are visiting me. good evening and maxim kobyakov is a journalist. good evening at the end of the program our guests and optimists will make a forecast of what probability in 10 years the rules of the road will really not be needed about the history of the rules of the road, our expert professor kapustin of the road will tell. this is the basis of civilization. one of the most ancient roads has been preserved in egypt already 5,000 years ago, according to blocks were delivered to it for the construction of the great ones, the pyramids were preserved and the roads and india built too thousands of years ago at first , sadness was dragged along the roads, harnessing not only animals, but also people. the invention of the wheel increased the speed of the road paving increased the comfort of communication with

the absence of vehicles, the track gauge was constantly changing the romans were the first to legalize the width of the roads, the road should be two horses' asses wide. well, this is about 2 meters with a tail. the romans for the first time introduced the rule of one-way traffic the ban on driving around the city in the morning and in the evening had its own rules, and for the park the first modern rules were adopted in europe in 1893 , after 3 years they appeared in russia at the very beginning of the 20th century. international rules and road signs similar to modern ones were established, the main unresolved problem today is versatile traffic, 2/3 of motorists use right-hand traffic, the rest are left-hand traffic, and the most common

traffic violations are speeding and aggressive driving. well, here i have the question is about the most common violations. confess a lot of fines for the past month paid. not a single one, but the truth is, of course, i try to ride the subway, but i also try not to break the story when i go. and you, well, i also prefer public transport, but uh, i also use a navigator, and it tells you very well where the speed limit is. yes, that's why it's just a speed limit in moscow within the garden ring. many places have reduced to 50. and km. i know that there is little in the car, denis noticed aleksandrovich i know that you are interested in the history of traffic rules. in general, when the first rules of the road appeared . and why exactly? this is fucking horror. well, as already mentioned by professor e, it is customary to count the appearance of traffic rules from julius caesar in the fiftieth year bc, and when due to

collision problems. uh, according to the age of transport on the streets of the city, some basic rules were introduced, at the same time, just one-way traffic was introduced. not a number of restrictions. well, there was only this one. a non-climbing policeman, but a lying legionnaire well, for example, in order to ensure priority when passing through an intersection, it was necessary for wealthy people to hire a special person, who was a so-called walker, who could run in front of the chariot and provide. uh, unhindered crossroads. well, yes, everything as it is now can also sometimes be hired. escort. yes, in principle, they didn’t go far, and then hmm , you can probably look at the middle ages, when e was declared during the time of chivalry the rules for the knights' departure were declared, and there we also got right-hand

traffic. however, in a number of countries such as the left side has appeared. and perhaps these mistakes, just so that they are not quite to each other, because in irony because you are in your left hand with a shield. you are afraid of the oncoming one yes, in a number of countries such as the uk japan australia india that's where the left-hand side just appeared and it was borrowed and shipping. so, uh, he goes here, so, well, that's how it actually happened until now. well further we can mention in russia, peter the great issued decrees on how to ride a sleigh correctly, and catherine issued interesting acts on how to punish those who do not follow the rules of the road . well, the rules really began to appear with the advent of cars, uh, in the 19th century. and each country approached this problem in its own way. well, for example, an interesting story happened in england when a

for more than a dozen years. uh, such a rule was adopted when, firstly , the speed of the car was limited to six kilometers now, and secondly in front of the car. i had to run to warn a person, yes, with a flag and warn about the approach of this iron monster, which could harm society and this story often cites an example of how, when, regulation of activities harms the development of technology. well, you can take the twentieth century further, a series of events happened in paris and in vienna about the end point, you can probably consider, uh, the convention that was adopted at the general assembly in 1968, if i'm not mistaken when 68 countries signed up to some unified system of rules that gave rise to each of the countries to develop in their own way

. yes, well, but the last few decades have been this, and the rules have evolved somehow. absolutely in the continuation of the story of denis alexandrovich's story , in fact, modern rules are the history of modern technical progress. this and cars absolutely true to this road and elements of the technical arrangement of roads and starting in paris in 909 literally with the number of signs that can be counted on the fingers of one hand. we gradually grew in the thirty-first year of 26 characters, and then they no longer fit on one or more pages, and in the sixty-eighth year, by the way, everything was not over, and the convention was further improved in the seventy-fifth year and so on, because new technologies appeared security in the car itself, which is also it was necessary to take into account the rules and this process, you know, signs

were unified all over the world, if i'm not mistaken, until the age of 31, respectively, somewhere they were in text format, somewhere they were in the usual graphic format. but after that now everywhere in the world they are unified. that is, they are clear to everyone. and what is the beauty of these conventions of problems is not only in difference. extraneous or right-hand traffic this is a solvable question that if in one country the driver is taught to recognize one set of rules and the other another. we will have an international movement. this is the importance of unified rules of unified approaches, on the basis of which national traffic rules are then formulated and the process does not stand still. yes, for now the same vienna convention, despite all the iterations. the following changes are now being considered, which just happened due to a technological leap. we once considered unmanned movements here in this studio, but unmanned movement in the same way requires changes in the vienna convention, because now according to its provisions, the car must always go under the control of the person driving. that is, yes, the driver, so that

artificial intelligence is introduced. it is necessary to make an exception, it is necessary to write, the corresponding new rules and a new paragraph, to allow him to participate on the road was riding. uh, right here for the shoot . here the sidewalk is going fast enough from this bug, apparently, the delivery man. e. with wheels and he rides alone and he doesn’t have a rides quite high in the pedestrian zone, he rides on a pedestrian, but he clearly reduces me as a pedestrian. here i also have a question. he told her quickly enough he is massive. he weighs 40 kilograms. well, we are talking now after all about cars, road traffic , pedestrians. we are not so regulated, but in a different pedestrian. is not included in traffic. yes, but you and i don’t have a rule on pedestrian passages for the fact that i crossed incorrectly. it's completely different. it was you who stood on the roadway on the roadway , this is different, respectively, the mountain. these are the rovers that you see now are known for these russian company. these are indeed pedestrians, but on our roads in the same south-west of moscow yes, very often you can

see an unmanned vehicle of the same company that is already moving on public roads. so this is the experimental legal regime. that is, it is an exception to the law. this is an experiment. they do not comply with international requirements. now every side is going on. it's exactly like this. such a movement, that is, everyone is accumulating statistics so that later, on the basis of the united nations, to come to something single. we in russia have already gone further than modern iterations of legal regimes that allow remote control, that is, a dispatcher without a person driving, by the way, technology. we'll be back, but after the commercials. advertising on ntv who is hiding under the mask of a charming beautiful hamster? i myself personally went on stage in her mask , show mask, and they dance, this name is forbidden to pronounce. the long-awaited, people's

artist of russia and they dance who will be the next mask on sunday 22:20 on ntv the main premiere of the year, the nevsky new season tomorrow at 20:00 tinkov credit card up to 700.000 rubles. kopeyli and compensate the name of the air ticket. fly free maintenance forever.

star sale on the hardens tv zone for 15.99 in nepic club panty diapers for 499 tommy hilfiger t-shirt for 1999 favorite chmoni who controls the universe screws maria is the hostess, or olya tolivera sanya sanya return the mower vik wool no matter who you transfer or pay it is important that without commission and restrictions, alpha-bank was the first in russia to cancel commissions for all transfers and payments. order a free debit alpha-card alpha-bank the best mobile bank for the family 249 rubles.

convenient to listen to music music all i want to have here is the sound of a new handy app with music foot pain swelling expert. troxevasin is obviously the symptoms of varicose veins, it is important to treat and from the inside we present a new tablet troxative from troxevasin

druga active acts on the veins from the inside against edema, cramps and more in the legs. an expert look at the treatment of varicose veins. meet the new card for life from vtb get cashback up to thirty percent and 1,000 rubles. after the first purchase. get a free card for life on vtb.ru. do you want to know what benefit is the mega power of your free mobile operator? and tens of thousands of them are sold only on auto.ru. at first i did not believe the question. why are you not on auto.ru yet? get started,

install the sportmaster mobile application choose your bmx bike and buy for a 15% discount on the first online gas sportmaster - the most sporty application pay with one touch of your phone with save. enjoy living design. check your balance on the payment screen. get a cashback bonus for every purchase. connect the world in the sberbank online application. pay by phone, creativity can be different artistic applied creative research constant work on yourself allows you to reach heights, everyone can discover talents in themselves to fight with the best, only by competing we grow. from april 21 to april 26, saratov is the 22nd youth delphic games of russia, creativity is always a competition. on air program about how

science will change our lives, in the next 10 years, in 10 years, traffic rules will not be needed, and our expert professor kapustin is talking about the difficulties of observing traffic rules when there are a lot of traffic rules. this means that there are no uniform rules, which is good. if the rules are, well, uniform across the country, but not so rare, there are rules for the provinces of regions and even for various villages. in thailand, the one who blinked his headlights first passes first. in india , the larger vehicle passes first, somewhere studded tires are allowed, and somewhere they will punish me for this, when i start my car, the headlights turn on by themselves in some countries. this is not at all necessary. the most confusing situation with radar detectors was once you

could even go to jail for them, plus the confiscation of a car in luxembourg. the car must have wipers, even if its car does not have windows, in china it is forbidden to stop and slow down before pedestrian crossings in colombia i was driving along the highway lanes, which were separated by centimeter-high spikes. five no one tried to overtake us. well, the craziest of all the rules of the road in the united states, they differ in each state, but americans also follow the rules of the road. where better. and yet i hope that in 10 years the rules of the road will be the same around the globe. i'm not sure what it is, perhaps, you travel in india , there these tuk-tuks are everywhere they have their own rules and i'm not sure that we will be able to comply with them, but they came, yes sergey yuryevich and who today

is compiling the change rules of the road to unify them and in general, how does science help? today, our traffic rules are approved by the government of the russian federation , a proposal that comes from citizens, public organizations, and scientific organizations. but now when i move on, that is, if we take people specifically, yes, who are engaged in changing the rules. we have, in principle, two main departments. this is the ministry of internal affairs and the ministry of transport, which means that the ministry of transport has a special unit and even a university where there is a department of road safety, and accordingly, there is an internal affairs department, but a scientific institute. e, too, road safety. so, in principle, these people, who are directly related to science, they develop the norms of the rules of the road, which then go to the government, and then the process itself and the approval procedure itself is quite complicated, because including you and i can participate in this, if we are not too lazy and get into the government portal, where the draft

regulations are published. we can quite see what is offered to us. uh, the government that offers us just these institutions and we can, but quite ourselves, issue our own proposals for, so to speak, change and improvement, of course. unfortunately , today it also happens that, uh, i would say that it is not random people, but sometimes some kind of camaraderie that leads. uh, including the approval of the rules of the road. it's difficult here too. the question is the administrative code. yes, where it is indicated that a person is not held administratively liable if he exceeded up to 20 km / h, and this speed is set does it apply to the rules of the road or not? does it apply to you yes, we are like people who rule, we understand that yeah. here we can drive a little faster and we won’t get anything for it. thus, in principle, any deputy and any senator , for example, can carry a proposal and cut off this indicator there with you, so to speak, and we will be more afraid, yes , because we will , so to speak, see 10 km / h there, so to speak,

god forbid, if we find out about it, yes, we may not find out. and we can find out already from the employee the police, who will stop us and say no or even yes, and when we get the receipts home from the robot, which is soulless, so to speak, which is generally related to us, so to speak, with him. e, no one can say, here. but basically, of course, the government puts the main things, but i will say that today, and in the nineteenth year , a certain moratorin was imposed on changing the rules of the road. why because there were a lot of changes from 2010 to 2017, especially in the seventeenth year there was a whole bunch, there 46 change they won’t let me lie, and in the nineteenth year, we, in principle, sort of realized that a lot now depends not on the rules, on the technology , corrected, it needs to be suspended and disassembled properly. yes pay attention already to the motion technology. here, uh, what we are talking about is that you can lead to the fact that after 10 years of rules this will not be needed in

moscow, a lot of people have appeared, and m delivery people who ride bicycles, and with salts, it’s just a huge iron bike with electric motor, and it is no longer bike. he's already a moped. thank them very much. they deliver. we have loads of food there, but they rush along my sidewalk to their children. already broke a few. and they knock down such a bike. he's all there already under 100kg and he's going fast and knocking him down. well, now you can not collect the bones. that is, i can write proposals on the government website to somehow restrict this movement. i understand correctly, do you really understand? hot topic because, well, bikes. okay, these cases are rare, but uh, people who ride scooters. yes, these are the cases when someone knocked someone down, they are really very common. here, uh, this year has already brought, the results are such that, uh, serious bodily injuries were inflicted. yes, in such accidents. this is already sad enough, but i will say so on

the first part of the question. i answer positively. really. we can influence this. yes. we can e through various public organizations, for example, the public chamber makes its proposals and distributes its proposal on the website. we can accommodate your suggestions. yes, so to speak, by way, and the exchanges that are provided there, but for the second part of the answer. i will answer in the negative. why because in fact this rule already exists, that is, they cannot. they don't drive on crosswalks. yes, not on the sidewalks of the rules of the road. this is provided, unfortunately, just these people violate this rule of the road. yes, and here the question is, as we have for the most part the question is not in the law, but in the right of application. how to make sure that they don’t go there, because we’ll talk, right? you uh, it turns out agree that the rules of the road are lagging behind, or still not lagging behind. and you know, i agree with everyone a little bit, because professor kapustin is absolutely correct in saying that there are many rules and they are

slightly different, this is true. so i agree. e, sergey yurievich. just in the part that the rules, probably need to improve and change something there, yes, and yes, and at the same time, you are asking the right question. why? but because we drive according to the rules, but judges us according to the code of administrative offenses according to the codec on administrative offenses. we have ecoap rules don't match each other don't always match and there are weird things. for here, for understanding, so to speak, in an ordinary person, you leave the secondary road to the main one. ah. you understand that you can drive on the main road at a speed of 90 km/h. i am exaggerating the simplest example of an understandable seven. you look, yes, there is a car over there. well, it's like it's already far away, you are taxiing onto this road, and he is not going at a speed of 90 conventionally on the main road. and even if he rides on his lane, he will even

go the other way. you still drove onto the road, and on the main road you didn’t let the transport pass what it violated there. this is how he should answer for this. but you should have skipped it. here we have a lot of casuistry that does not reflect. quite, understandable and things are for everyone, but in europe they have long moved to the next stage, when, when considering such a case, and this is a real case in judicial practice, when the judge really looks and says, dear. should have traveled with at a speed of 90 and then the person who calculates the distance and time you would calmly leave and drive everything manually, which is also inconvenient, by the way, in the traffic rules that worked in the soviet union, even the norm was such that the driver who follows the rules himself traffic has the right to rely on the observance of the rules by another person, and i will tell you, so even now there are no rules. this ruled out a very rare jurisprudence . yes, here i am. e. recently, as a student unearthed, he found one solution, only one

throughout russia where this phrase was indicated and i think it is correct, but we have no precedent in this case, unfortunately , yes, that's why i would do something with our traffic rules. it is clear that they will not disappear in 10 years. i don't believe in it. even even here is a zero percent probability. wait a chance. if you talked more, i would simplify them, because we have many of us why the moratorium was imposed, because all this has come to light. it waits at some moments until such a casuistry, in which it is difficult to understand a lot of words. very wordy simple things we have about traffic controllers in the rules. open look at this paragraph. although the traffic controller is this official who is endowed with the right to regulate traffic. you can put a point. well, it's understandable . yes, we have a leading one of the leading programs. it regulates our conversation, and there it is separated by a comma. if the director says, then and so on. why do we already understand that yes or parking, what is

parking? it is clear that parking is a place, yes, marked for recreational transport for parking lots and there, separated by commas, which can be located under overpasses. for what? it's the same rule of the road rules. these are specific things that can be written somewhere in by-laws in some specific rules, and so on. after all, we are not writing this rule for those who arrange, uh, paid or free parking, but for drivers and so on. and i would have many such places. this garbage is superfluous, but informational verbal, i would remove, but add those things that denis spoke about, and which requires time, modern in connection with autonomous driving in connection with new security systems and so on, that is , some things have simplified the possibilities of simplifying yesterday's things and modernizing them. uh, get to leave a place for modern things alexandrovich what technical means are used today to comply with the rules of the road? well

it's exactly the same as evolution, usually for the growth of the movement. that is, having passed from a simple traffic controller, who could not be without partiality. we switched to technical means of flow delimitation, traffic light barriers and so on. here is the camera camera. now it's artificial intelligence. this is exactly what the idea should be, as they say. yes, without prejudice to assess fine to regulate. but so far, here we have questions. yes, we constantly see you on the gazelle internet now with speed. 30 km/h, well, of course, this unit is fun. here in general, yes the system works. it is much more efficient and all-weather, and around the clock. that's much. in my opinion , another question disciplines more, what exactly are the places we still we will discuss technologies, but after advertising, advertising on ntv habitual actions no longer help. afobazole helps to cope with anxiety and insomnia afobazole 4 weeks for the most pronounced effect, and the corridor of discounts in

the active phase. and what does it mean to be sold out, that at the ozone star sale a smartphone of technocommunes for 10.990 rubles. and a bayson-bakte mattress for 7.690 rubles. music music sound is a new handy app with music. remember what you were told when you decided to open a business, custom jewelry. yes, who will buy it, but you did not listen, because you do everything not this way. continue registering your business with alfa bank and open an account with free

service alfa bank is the best bank for business. you want to know? what is benefit is the megapower of your tariff for free, which you need in the megafon application , the number one mobile operator? of these, they are sold only on auto.ru.

open an fsb savings account and count the interest, and not your father. fsb savings account is not only reliable, but also profitable nine nuggets for 69 rubles. kfc at least stop, at least order a discount corridor in the active phase rasprodams, expensive so not the season for sales venus ozone with a full basket see for yourself 17 to 30 april star sale for 1999 rubles. more cargo nord-layer for 1999 rubles. and it's all a good

app. paid service forever tinkoff, he is the only one now sold in russia. in a tens of thousands of them are sold only on auto.ru. at first i did not believe the question. why are you not on auto.ru yet? wind it up, it infects, tears the voice and nerves beats per minute can not be counted, it leads to creep to goosebumps. yes, fevers, yes tears, we all sick of football. get down to football in the stadium. meet the new season. apply for a fan card

on gosuslugi.ru on the air, a program about how science will change our lives for the next 10 years , traffic rules will not be needed. and how the organization of traffic will change in the next 10 years. you know what worries us on the road, when we drive, drive or sit next to us, we care about our own safety. so there are two factors that affect this safety, including the consequences of this first is the exit into the oncoming lane of traffic. and second - it's pedestrians. yes, when a driver knocks down pedestrians, or maybe, so to speak , change their places, but look. here i can give an example of this. in the ninety -third year, everyone remembers that the mkad was built, dividing boards once the number of fatal traffic accidents decreased. true unfortunately, then this figure still jumped due to

the speed limit, but the result is still there. it's still less than it was. yes, if now, probably, there are about 100 such accidents in year was 200 at least. and what should we remove all the roads? imagine such a uh, drowning picture, when all the roads of moscow are removed in tunnels, they are all separated, so to speak, according to the movement, but you and i are a children's car in the groove. you let her in, where will she go in front of the system to arrange. this is without and movement without is much better. yes, because the enclosed space makes it easier to install these sensors. er, well, that is well, nothing can be done. that is, you just need to do something special to get into an accident there. pedestrians. well, let's build pedestrian crossings. even now i already know some places. here is the moscow region. the driver himself traveled the most there, when the balashikha ends such a dark place, i remember there, probably in the late nineties there were accidents almost every day, and unfortunately, once in transitions. i have not seen such accidents there for a long time. and that is, it is possible, in

principle, with technological solutions, and unleash a lot of problems in traffic, and the correct traffic will become an instruction on how to get into the car it just turns out, if the technical commit, uh, the offense is impossible, you don't need the rules. yes, theoretically it is. e, well , we know how life is, how it goes we read fiction, yes, then we see, remember in the eighties. yes call from the forest, tell someone, or we are now calling, from anywhere. yes, but it's the same situation here. yes, our science fiction writers draw, and we will see what kind of films yes, when a car moves through the air, so to speak, everything does not move, uh, it is controlled by robots or artificial intelligence and no accidents occur. perhaps we are still moving towards this question in one. will 10 years be enough for this? but we see perfectly well that sometimes there is an explosive development of science, when science solves these problems faster. denis aleksandrovich well , indeed, technologies do not stand still.

so maybe artificial intelligence will completely take over the provision of road safety, but there according to its own internal algorithms and rules, and in general, so that people do not interfere in this at all and do not fit in. i am convinced that artificial intelligence will radically improve road safety, and by implementing many interesting concepts. here, i’ll try to talk about a few, firstly, i see a promising direction in predictive analytics, when using artificial intelligence you can create decision support, which during the operation of the car can determine how the state of the car says that your wheel will fall off soon you need to drive in for a gas station. so the condition of the driver. are you tired you need to stop and another promising direction. here i am adding a colleague. this is traffic optimization management. well, here, uh, you can remember the concept of a smart city, or you can collect statistics, and traffic from all kinds of sensors

that are installed in the city and make management decisions on creating an optimization of the road network, managing traffic light modes, and so on. this also leads to a reduction in accidents. another direction was also mentioned. this is actually the control of compliance with the rules of the road. successfully used here computer vision technology we all know these cameras that send us fines. and this also leads to the fact that not smart enough, if another driver is driving my car, and he violates the fine, it comes to me because i am the owner of the car, but already artificial intelligence. can determine by the person to whom to send this fine that scenario, when he comes to the address, yes , they determine the picture in the form of a living person. yes, for now. well, that is, the face is visible, but it is clear that i am not sitting there, in principle, it seems to me that can imagine already use. uh, face id. and these show

that technology is already an administrative code. it's just written right there. why , it is the owner of the car who is held liable. although here i am as a lawyer, i think i don’t understand, it’s coming to me , so to speak, and i’m just according to the rules anyway, i’m guilty, it doesn’t seem like the movement should, namely the administrative code. if , god forbid, the car was stolen and the rules were violated on it, they still differ completely and you will never prove your innocence in court, because there is no litigation until this moment, when you that's until you have filed a claim that the car was stolen from. and if it happens, for example, my autopilot and it violates something, it’s to blame. in any case, we have it i have no answer to argue. yes, another direction. look, it is possible to optimize the development of roads and, in general, monitor their condition so as not to shift the asphalt every year in the same place to ensure

road repairs according to condition. here artificial intelligence can be engaged in the creation, and machines with the help of mathematical modeling, where artificial intelligence technologies are also applied, providing, well, different technical parameters, uh, avoiding full-scale experiments. well, for example, in my opinion. the most interesting direction is unmanned vehicles. they. it may also have been mentioned. and here i see great prospects, maybe not in terms of a complete transition to unmanned vehicles. here is an example of urban transport, quite. could be unmanned different trucks can be unmanned. and such projects are already all over the world is being launched with might and main, but at the same time i want to note, answering your question directly, no, artificial intelligence will not allow us to forget about the problem of road safety . we will always have. uh, malicious intent randomness unpredictable events, and road users are both pedestrians and passengers. uh, this will all lead to inevitable

traffic violations. it turns out, no matter how technical means, artificial intelligence people help us. well, as if the human factor is to blame for everything, in fact, yes? well, we can go demonstrate clearly. oh well, he thinks that we have wonderful cars that would drive very well without us. yes, ready quickly 1 2. well, of course, yes, but quickly next. yes , the blonde behind the wheel is called. yes, i was driving well, i broke it a little, it doesn’t matter on this optimistic night, we’ll go to advertising on ntv . the liberals began to say that it was lenin’s fault, that he divided the country into

republics. and so it broke up russian writer on the role of lenin in history. it was not he who created them, invented and divided them, he already as republics. lenin thrust ukraine back into the country, returned great russia, and that's exactly what he did. lenin was the first to defeat all-ukrainian separatism. he managed, he managed, ntv's zahar the main premiere of the year, the nevsky new season. tomorrow at 20:00 day after day anxiety restlessness, and with them insomnia habitual actions no longer help to cope with anxiety and insomnia four weeks for the most pronounced in actions. in the active phase and what does it mean migo packaging of moomin diapers for 959 rubles. and gel for washing jackets and sneakers active at a discount

50%. alfa-bank was the first in russia to cancel commissions for all transfers and payments. order a free debit alpha card alpha bank best mobile bank. music music sound is a new handy app with music do you want to know? what is benefit is the megapower of your tariff for free. activate the mega powers you need in the megafon app , the number one mobile operator tinkov credit card with a limit of up to 700,000 rubles. save a mile and compensate them for airfare. fly for free

i will have time to issue on the thirtieth of april and get free service forever tinkoff he is the only one now sold in russia. only on auto.ru the largest base of new buildings and reliability of the sphere look for an apartment on the house click service of new buildings number one future in which you don’t have to choose between form and content between complete control and absolute freedom we don’t imagine it like that we create it fastback crossover amoda , c5 with intelligent four-wheel drive system, choosing the path you choose the future looks great sauce from i love to cook will

cooler catch bro. with brand new sauces. i like to cook brighter taste brighter mood i did not believe the question at first. why are you

not on auto.ru yet? are you starting? with alpha-bank and open a business account with free service alpha-bank is the best bank for business music is a new convenient application with music. forest fires are caused by humans. stop and defeat the fire. vocation of strong forest firefighters of the rosleskhoz guard, 90 years guarding the forests of russia

i love you scorpio mask, the second semi-final on sunday at 22:20 on ntv on the air of the science and we program is a program about how science will change our lives in the next 10 years, if the human factor is to blame for everything. believed traffic was irrelevant. i just listen to opponents, and especially denis , i generally want to say. yes, everything is great. it is possible in some city, probably, but in one separately taken scale of the country, our

ideas. we have kamchatka we have siberia we have i don’t know, kola peninsula. moscow south of the country. uh, science hail. we are an optimist and about the good , of course, yes, that is, you can do something , you can put cars in the gutters and so on , all this already takes time and money and, of course, we will not do it. not in 10 years, nor in maybe even 20 to introduce some elements. we can improve safety, but in such a way that everything is beautiful, but in some countries they just determine the person of the driver, and they told me a funny story when a person drove alone in a car. he always had a tennis racket, on the right, we will not be able to do this for one simple reason, because we have road users, including pedestrians. we mentioned here that unmanned vehicles drive around moscow, studying, for example, in machine thinking teaches what to determine? now imagine a car. you drive up, yes, a pedestrian crossing behind a car along

a pedestrian crossing is a person, and in a winter hat with a pompom. if you are a person it is a teenager and you see only a hat. you understand that the hat cannot walk by itself, and this man, apparently, is walking, but right here in front of a car, behind which a person is not visible, a pedestrian crossing. and you understand that when you drive up to the pedestrian crossing, apparently, this person, he can jump out impossible. right now, machines and thinking, which are precisely our scientists who are engaged in and who are engaged in our drones. they teach this thinking machine to distinguish that if such a triangular thing with a pom-pom moves, this hat may be a person. but this is still only at the learning stage, and there are a lot of moments at which we will not be able to teach or train artificial intelligence. i can draw some things. well, an example that i never knew that artificial

intelligence will not understand that this person is wearing a hat. well, it's obvious that i'm just an optimist who says that everything can be taught. two simple examples that everyone, both pedestrians and motorists, understand. here is the road and the exit. e from the road from two wounds, for example, here the car wants to go here, if we are in the city and in a traffic jam , here we have a million cars going to many, many, many and no one usually skips. yes, according to the rules , one must be passed through, but this is not written according to the rules. and if you really move according to the rules, then the car has never been seen, yes, and we must somehow magically register some rules or a violation of the rules with a drone, or even more like that. well, maybe a little more complicated. but everyone understands the example on the base, which i also explain obvious things, again we have

a simple road, but suppose that we do not have discontinuous separating, yes, continuous there is a car with emergency gang. that's how she got fined. one day i was waiting. yes, they survived, i did not come. so i got fined. why did they go around? because because here is a pharmacy. pharmacy and apparently, something happened overnight and apparently, well, there are different situations in life, a person ran to this pharmacy. something urgently needed child sick, bad person. you came up behind. the autopilot will stand here with a red flag until the second coming. that is, it will never pass. we looked around, seeing that no one no, like a traffic cop's hare. no. we will most likely unite, here, but bad is bad, because this is a violation of traffic rules. but, if we imagine the real situation,

starting a pharmacy, 2 o'clock in the morning, there is no one at all. well, you're unlikely to stand. and even if you do this in america , they said there, yes, we discussed that in america they observe the sale of the movement very strictly. you are an inspector. there are no traffic police at all. i had quite a similar experience. can you explain it, well, i tried. but there were still many, many cars, many, many, and they were not fined. naturally me, because i'll be the first to do it. i say that they would all stand behind me all the people at home want to teach. and if we take a person who is either trying to cross the road, or doing something else, or road workers, in all this construction, in all this construction, in any of the examples. here they opened the hatch and they are doing something to protect. this is a different story. again , it's good that if they fenced, yes, that's why the autopilot is not a solvable task. and therefore, the rules are certain rules of the road or the rules by which in the car in

the brain will be laid. here are the departure rules. they still have to be, someone must prescribe them so that engineers use them, and when teaching a car to make certain body movements of the road. good, then. my question to the optimists from the skeptic is very simple. let's imagine for a second that the rule of the road is followed by everyone , absolutely everyone follows the rules of the road and drivers and pedestrians, that's all, and even cats and dogs, and this guarantees the absence of an accident. no, no, firstly, there is a technical factor, a car can break down, and yet, if a person is driving, then something can also happen to a person, and this factor from a poor state of the unexpected. sometimes people even die while driving. such cases, too, unfortunately, happen to be corny. i was distracted , i thought. uh, i got into a conversation with a

beautiful girl who sits next to me, stared , read an advertisement, which we have full of, and so on. that is, this is art, and no one has canceled the human factor. i would i would like to ask, i would say that in the current conditions, probably not, but i think that it is still possible to achieve such security with technological solutions? yes, most likely, only malicious intent will remain, and even that one can be 90% chosen. absolutely correctly support this movement to zero accident statistics and also the technical condition of the car. it now more and more falls under the predictive things that are available in modern cars. security, which often takes control if a person has become ill, therefore i believe and i think it will be so, and the average age of a car in our country is 14 years old, and now she is listening to a person who has an old tattered six zhiguli plane tree, and it has been patched. he sits thinking, yes, in a day in 10 years, and you are 24. the right to dream no

, this is a good thing, science does not stand still. anyway, dear guests, optimistic skeptics, i have all the questions for you. with what probability in 10 years the rules of the road will still not be needed sergey yuryevich let's know. so i specially studied before the transfer, and materials of the work of the project committee on road safety and i will say this, it is not aimed at changing the rules of the road today. it is aimed precisely at creating e technological conditions that will not allow this, but violations of the rules. for example, an experiment was conducted in bryansk. e at 21. so, which, well, i won't talk about the subtleties, but it was a technological experiment, including luminous pedestrian crossings, but these, uh, blue flashing lights, so to speak, and so on. that is, the presence effect is 63% decreased, and accidents on the roads. that is , we, in principle, really have reason to believe that sooner or later the rules will not be needed, and we will be given such technological conditions that we will not be given. possibility a to drive in an emergency, well

, 10 years is enough for us, what is the probability that this will happen in 10 years? i think 10 years is enough. this is quite a lot of question here, of course, a complicated one, but with sufficient, uh, development of technology. they are going fast with us now. yes, they are fast. and i think that after 10 years. we can achieve this with 100% probability, as an optimist, i cannot say otherwise. in my opinion the probability is 100% 100%. thank you a large percentage understands the pace of development and production of automobiles and the development of the road network. now we have more than 40 million vehicles; in 10 years, 40 million vehicles in the russian federation have been registered, and it is impossible to replace this entire fleet with unmanned vehicles overnight to make the infrastructure appropriate. that is, it is a gradual process, when we have will be replaced, yes, perhaps, by unmanned technologies, but they will still interact with those cars

that are controlled by a living person, so rules will be needed. in any case, moreover, the rules of the road . they will become the basis for writing algorithms for drones, so anyway, in one form or another, i am sure that they will be. well, in general, 0%. thanks a lot. it seems to me that in the horizon of 10 years such areas will inevitably arise such technological zones, there may be cities in which the rules exist, but the need for their use and application will be minimized. well, i would estimate probably, let it be 60%, meaning the decline, and bearing in mind the appearance of these cities and the decline in the decline in them, er, the need. yes , the use of rules, as such, through the use of different technologies 60% by the way, not necessarily unmanned vehicles. and a bunch of other 60%. thank you very much even on

the railroad. and where are these trains from the track, and there are rules of the road. have their own semaphores on one-knee e, roads there are some nuances of my own there, there are and so on, and in this sense, of course, i agree with denis alexandrovich, and he is the only practitioner among all those present here. , so of course, and the rule will not disappear the probability of 0%, but i believe that we should spend these 10 years trying to simplify them in those places where they can be simplified and add what you need to add a simple example. what's happened safe distance we still don’t define the rules, we don’t know what a safe distance is, and in some other german countries it is expressed in meters, if you drive at a speed of 100 km / h, the german knows he divides 50 m in half - this is it turns out and

get 50m, the minimum distance he has to keep in the uk is expressed in seconds, for example, how much do you drive? here, yes, and so on. in america , i know if you can distinguish the sign uh in the previous license plate - it means, it's kind of already somewhere on the roads, there are special assistants. yes, the markings that say, here, if you are less than one one distance, you have this one before the car. this is already dangerous , and so on and so forth, and we must expand, and that spectrum corrects the articles in the traffic rules that regulate the behavior of pedestrians. and those who are used by means of individual mobility. this is what we are able to do in 10 years, and it seems to me that this will lead to positive results, but on the whole it is still zero. thanks a lot. well , as expected, but only with a probability of 40 percent of the rules of the road.

in 10 years they won’t be needed, if we didn’t break it ourselves, maybe the rules wouldn’t be needed, but so the rule, firstly, was created in order to protect us, yes, as road users, of course, we would like so that science moves forward faster, so that autopilots are introduced that do not violate the smart autopilot, so that smart roads are introduced. and all this we want let's hope. if there is a style, perhaps 10 years will not be enough, but i would like to hope that they are already beginning to take root and will be full of holes, as as quickly as possible and each road user on his six 14-year-old. one day i could even make this fourteen-year-old six without a pilot that does not violate the correct safety, but whether you have it or not, we will find out pretty quickly in the next 10 years. it was a program about how science will change, including that life is with you for the next 10 years, do not violate the rules of the road. they are not just created. let's be safe, see you in a week bye.

keep in mind the discounted price but promotions until the end of the week only until the end of the week, so hurry up. she was orientated this morning, now

they say, like, no, i didn’t see it for sure. i have been wanting a smartphone for a long time. yes, i would love to, but i invested everything in my old woman, i installed a new engine. there they are schmid for you, vova , press the pedals, let's not catch up. and we 'll see this. come on, let's cut the road repair to the left.