i don’t know with the army, it’s natural . generals to manage the criminal world during the term of shakro the young planned to appoint the thief in law shishkan oleg medvedev now with the plus that supposedly in the criminal world decided while you are in prison, huh? choose your name shishkanov. what are you, do you know him or not? however , an investigation is underway against medvedev, as a result of which he can retire for a long time and, most importantly, the task of the security forces today is to prevent a new war for the criminal throne. there will be a nuclear strike coming term, well, just in case, you never know the fans of nuclear weapons have gone bang. oh this is an ocular nuclear war

in real we have. and where are we going then horror horror. guys, what's wrong with my face? hello this is info shield program. i am vladimir chernyshov who owns the information owns the world, but the world is now managed by fakes and manipulations. remember, for example, how a test tube of washing powder caused the americans to invade iraq . we will separate facts from fakes so that we remain on the bright side and not succumb to false promises today in world

trends there is news that russia is an aggressor and they are preparing a nuclear strike on the west. that being said, you've never heard anything like it. and here again, the truth is blackmailing the peace-loving notebook with nuclear weapons. now let's figure it out. here is western society, as if preparing for a nuclear war more and more often. they say that citizens should somehow get used to this, and even nice and kind american townsfolk begin to believe that that the russians are preparing to press the button, a new round of hysteria began after putin's statement that tactical nuclear weapons would be deployed in belarus at the request of its authorities. well , note, only posted not transferred posted. well, just in case, you never know what?

first, the united states has been doing this for decades. they have long placed their tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of their e, allied countries of nato countries in europe, and have not placed and are even proud of this, they do not hide it at all. but they can do it with them jellies of bright thoughts are pure. they are out of love for the world out of the same love persuaded ukrainians to die to the last russian to kill, and there territory why so many people on it? well, they have moved their arsenals for peace and goodness to our borders , obviously, and here we are in response. well, they moved too. and suddenly this kindness will be with fists. we need to respond with something. why do the americans do this with their allies on their territory, by the way, speaking, even the crews of their pilots use these weapons if necessary. we agreed that we did the same without

violating. i would like to emphasize this without violating my international obligations on non-proliferation. uh, nuclear weapons. we are normal people, we understand that the game on our part goes according to the rules, but the enemy has long given up on all the rules and the cards he has marked with the ball with his hand beats on the legs with boots. and when the judge whistles him to the side, he just throws up his hands. well you don't understand, this is another dangerous conversation causes concern. he generally understood what he was talking about, well, of course, grandfather is old, but after all, he completely forgot , the concern is that your troops around the world are worried that you start wars with the regularity of maniacs, all over the planet it causes concern that without he bombs sanctions, for example, the european city, belgrade , you overthrow the elected presidents, which prevent you from making announcements by dictators. this is what causes concern.

what are you like an overgrown hooliganro in his yard the younger ones obey, because they will beat, but the younger one will someday grow up and pump up. well, here someone has grown a little, or rather, returned part of the previous growth. well, he asks the bully. you are not insolent to wave your fists here. we, too, can now answer. and here again he explains to the neighbors in the yard. this is different. we condemn this statement. this is the latest example of irresponsible nuclear rhetoric that we can see in russia, no other country does such damage to arms control and does not seek to undermine strategic stability in europe yes , no other side. which side has nuclear weapons in six european countries. it is there why take schoolchildren on excursions? sorry, the question is still not decent. and who was the only one in the world who used this weapon, destroying two whole cities in japan, sort of like in the united states, probably, right? here

is wikipedia. well, the aggressor, of course, is russia, here is the reaction of the western press. freedom of speech is like that, if you commanded, then there are a lot of headlines in the channels of publications, for some reason it seems to everyone. i love you, well in general, you understand. in general, horror horror. horror, suddenly one sensible voice and from whom the same liberal-american press until recently accused of militancy , inadequacy, bloodthirstiness arrived, as i predicted. now we are playing with dangerous things, the nuclear word is now used absolutely everywhere around the world and we caused this situation here is what happens when incompetent people run the government

all i can tell you is right now get on your knees and pray and at the same time nato stubbornly reduces the flight time of nuclear missiles to russian cities is the same. it was during the caribbean crisis that the americans put a missile on our borders in turkey. in response, at their borders in cuba, the world was already on the verge of a nuclear war, but kennedy khrushchev was able to agree. both were in the second world war and remembered that the war is, of course, pitch hell, the americans then removed the missiles from turkey and we from cuba. then, in the seventies , a period of détente began altogether. now, in the western press, a new generation of experts refutes former fears, they say, there will be no nuclear winter. well, humanity will not perish. well, well, several million, only such lovely democratic humanists. however , suddenly healthy comes to them. here is a british analyst rzhals column for cnn writes that putin knew how, he delivered, a preemptive informational strike hit nato with nuclear weapons without using it, how putin's words

about deploying nuclear weapons in belarus were interpreted in the west may come as a surprise to moscow but no , without any doubts in fact, it will be a very pleasant surprise, because russia has already used nuclear weapons. she used it very successfully, without firing, talking about potential nuclear strikes, in order to very effectively keep the west from fully supporting ukraine. well, that is , they understood everything, we only had to show the gun, because they don’t want to understand the words of a bully, everything must inevitably return. we hope to discharge. although some in europe seem to still not understand anymore, happily declares that she is ready to accept herself the us nuclear arsenals, that is, to voluntarily make themselves a target to which the very first retaliatory missiles will reach. poland is the closest . but will the informational nuclear war still turn into a real one, we will talk about this with vladimir kobyakov

yes, the risks that everything will go wrong , these risks are always greater when there are correspondingly fewer transparent and generally accepted control mechanisms, well, one thing is clear that the main players want some new security architecture. here, let's see. is it possible now, at least in the nuclear sphere, forms of security architecture. cop wars tomorrow at 18:00 on ntv cartazonbank with free service it is profitable to pay here and there-there-there cashback

pay azone bank cards with cashback up to 25% open for free in the ozon bank application. the only thing that saved the relationship of my heroes. watch only in online cinema. yandex and then weave the rest without interest on yandex.market diclofenackes in a package with a man contains a maximum concentration of the active substance of 5%. 5% gel. diclofenac alternative quality patriotic leon tickets.ru

ice cream pearl of russia 39 99 magnet price, what should you leave lathered? book your accommodation

on the daily.ru website, and i will give you cashback. rent even cheaper so quickly booked, where to stay? how to become these professionals from scratch practice practice practice and practice. go to the yandex website and start learning for free. meetings the right choice of millions of women one tablet in the morning two components three actions is protected with free service pay

promotion raffle 50 trips around russia a super prize of 100 million tickets at the post office and on inlota.ru circulation already this sunday he and dream on a large scale national lotteries sber megamarket opens the price of the park festival of discounts and the carousel of goods for the whole family, for example, the ninebot electric scooter. for only 23.990 rubles. sber megamarket lyusya has been in yandex for a long time. well, if you don’t know about films in the know, watch kinopoisk subscription yandex.plus until the end of summer for free. in this city, show the cop wars tomorrow

at 18:00 on ntv what the parties wanted until recently when extending the agreement on strategic offensive weapons, as they saw the contours with the main players. as a condition for extending the start treaty, it was proposed in moscow to pull up the china agreement, they say, you are negotiating with beijing, moscow then made it clear that it would not do this. but if china is needed, then washington, in russia's opinion, should pull the other two nuclear powers into the treaty. c and the uk in the trump administration answered him no, this is a complex design and france uk is not building up a nuclear arsenal and here is china a special case from beijing then answered several times that the agreement is such and uninteresting, because russia and the united states have a number of warheads incomparable to china. but from

the point of view of geopolitics, there was such a version that it was just beneficial for the time being that the two largest nuclear players limited each other. now already here in the current crisis. some faces have changed, but the biden administration speaks chinese again, and the kremlin believes that the case with ukraine confirmed that in the current conditions, a large nuclear the treaty must include all western partners and the united states and france, great britain, while if china agrees to enter the treaty on common nuclear arms control, then in beijing it will definitely indicate that it is necessary to include its main continental competitor india, and if india is involved nuclear deterrence, most likely, will name its condition to connect the contract with the nearest rival. stan, let china put pressure on him, it turns out. this is such a complex design, of course, if you don’t take his attention is also to north korea, which is under sanctions, which israel does not actually confirm, but does not officially refute the presence of nuclear weapons. and here is a question for you, vladimir ignaevich.

here is a real model for you, it seems, of such a new global nuclear weapons treaty. here at least with seven participants. by the way, this could become a prototype of such a stable polycentric world, or, after all , this is very cumbersome. this whole structure will not survive. well, it's all in the ward, of course, such proposals are pragmatic. well, in the current conditions, this is more and more reminiscent of such idealistic dreams that everyone will agree everything with each other, somehow turn on the mind, but for now, judging by the events called there, the mind is still very few who turned on at the moment, really this construction looks rather cumbersome and unviable, so we discussed strategies here. introductory armament strategic weapons treaty, that is, nuclear warheads and carriers for long distances. but there is also tactical does everyone understand nuclear weapons vladimirovich? what is the difference? well, you and i understand this, but still they don't understand. let's explain yes strategic treaty. the cis

of russia does not affect tactical weapons, these are usually aerial bombs and fighter carriers there for short distances. and this question here again becomes relevant. well , look, by the mid-eighties, europe was divided like this into nato in blue and the warsaw pact in red, in addition to european nato countries with their nuclear weapons. that is it france and great britain conditionally foreign american nuclear weapons were located in the federal republic of germany belgium holland italy germany turkey and at the american base in britain and the nuclear charges of the soviet union were located at about 10 bases of the gdr hungary more than czechoslovakia was a ready base for delivery, but without deployment in bulgaria ninety-first. the shaft here is a bloc of the organization of the warsaw pact and the soviet union and the countries of eastern europe soviet nuclear weapons were already withdrawn in the nineties russia takes all nuclear weapons from by the end of the nineties , the first east european wave of nato expansion begins in belarus from ukraine, but the americans promise to remove their nuclear warheads from the greek base.

then another wave of nato expansion and the americans promise to remove their nuclear warheads from britain. as a result, before the current crisis, american nuclear bombs remained on the territory of five european countries and russia annually reminded that in this way the states did not comply with the spirit of the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. here they say on their territory military allies of the organization of the road accident russia has not previously deployed its tactical nuclear weapons. and now the statement, at least nuclear bombs can return to belarus brought them out of there . the question of this program is sergei karaganov, a political scientist who has been in the top for 30 years in the nineties and two thousandths for 30 years, and he led analytical centers that prepared studies for the administration president for the meade, and that's surprising, despite getting into the sanctions lists,

some. yes, sergei alexandrovich, you are in demand, uh, the foreign press gives interviews and the new york times. so the bbc invites you to their programs. yes, recently you were on the bbc there you saw, we seemed to be vehemently, we spoke was called a tough conversation. i asked the host pretty. i am also a journalist. is he afraid of me, and then we laughed will be a nuclear strike, coming run in some place regardless of the probability of starting nuclear conflict. once there was no e for the last 56. well, 50 years, probably, yes, 45-50 years. er, this is true, but nevertheless intuition trained on your experience. you can still predict what will happen. here is something so terrible or in general, so i wanted to add that

you see the word, as they say, it is material. and so we see the rhetoric of late. it shifts to the fact that in general, nothing terrible happens. yes, if earlier it was such a sacred topic that nuclear war is something terrible, now we see what they say about it, well, quite possibly things. and here you also see some danger for perception. that is now uh, well, work on this is happening. more precisely, the phenomenon that my colleagues call me strategically is called logical parasitism. uh, 70 years without a war without a big war, but led to the fact that, and especially the population. by the way, they have lost their sacred fear of e, a nuclear war and are cutting with a knife what they openly support, and ukraine is actually fighting on the side of ukraine in the zone of

vital nuclear interests superpowers before, and it was considered absolutely impossible many things that used to be considered absolutely impossible. uh. now it becomes possible. i, uh, we are dealing with blocking and rita if the population is partially lost. it's a pretty tough situation, so uh, a very tough and subtle policy is needed right now in order to restore nuclear uh, the effectiveness of a big thermonuclear war, and secondly preventing war in general, now it doesn't work for me question oh oh, it's an eye from above . we have a voice over. there is an eye of the people, what is happening there. and what can become a red line, which here and during which gives rise to the use of nuclear weapons, either

the west or russia, but we are already very close to northern armageddon, the question is simply to move away from this red line. we also went off scale in modern russia stalin is an active political figure, the russian writer stalin for the russian man is god from a man of all the gods from a man, he is the most terrible, and the horror of stalin’s figure to the soviet leader it’s just that everything can be blamed on him that he will serve his hell for all of us that we will be justified at the expense of him zakhar sticking the hands of a russian today at 1:35 on ntv cop wars tomorrow 18:00 on ntv cartazone bank with free service pay here and there in the dress pay card up to 25%

open the free app. meet the whole month of music and drive is expanding. now the five cities of the country have even more favorite artists. waiting for you at the main event of the summer bc test meeting place with ber megamarket the stage opens with a park festival of discounts and a carousel of goods for the whole family, for example, t-shirts from 229 rubles. sber megamarket is the right choice for millions of women. one tablet in the morning two components, three actions protects blood vessels reduces capillary fragility increases vengen tone. just like one two three oh, remember, the legendary syrniki. a bright moment remains in memory. trust persil technology. its enzyme works not only on the surface of the tissue. once persil

always persil card halva opens the door to a fantastic shopping experience. even during discount periods and sales, any purchases will become even more pleasant with an installment plan for 10 months and a cashback of up to 10% the word of the relationship of my heroes will not take this chance from you. watch only in the online cinema okko tuk-tuk-tuk. these are sales knocking on the zone, and with great beauty , a sweatshirt of scientists for 399 rubles is very profitable. sports trousers for 1.499 rubles. a set of tools for the face knives academician for 299 rubles. paragraph deluxe at a bargain price in tasty and point, and

also in delivery now and in our application. vtb from a free debit card without commission and more than 10 countries of the world you can find a hotel on tutu and buy tickets for a plane, train or bus tutu, break out for a vacation. yandex.plit split split split prices

immediately, and the rest later without interest. sergei alexandrovich, for three decades, uh, you have been a prominent

political scientist, a prominent consultant and the presidential administration of various prime ministers. mida ah. so let's have prepared such a small cut of your statements, there the end of the nineties, the beginning of the two thousandths. let's listen to any military wants to have reserves, and i fully understand him and support it is another matter that this reserve can break, and sit the neck of any state, so we sat for a long time, we will not succeed, or we will be quietly pulled towards china india iran or we will try everything -to jump in the opposite direction, realizing that we do not need to surrender. so to speak, the core interests of extensions. uh, it's getting noticeably weaker every year, and it's weakening a lot in general as a result of the current expansion, because it's absorbing security consumers. i did weapons, unfortunately. it remains the central factor in world politics. and even despite the fact that it is written off for one

reason or another very often in order, for example, to reduce our influence in the world policy of nuclei, it already remains the main trump card. it's bad on the inside, but it's 2004. it was a fragment from 2004. you came to the conclusion that nuclear weapons are the last argument of kings. and now we see that there was such a fragment that dragged us, really towards china, iran and india. but you were saying what needs to be weakened. here is whether it weakened and why we ended up here at this point after all these uh, and in principle, this is not very effective, then we are strongly poddevaetsya exists on the basis. the united states of america will never, under any circumstances, practically come to

the aid of its allies if it threatens to retaliate with a nuclear strike on the territory of the united states of america, all nuclear deterrence is so deep. uh, theology means the american nuclear ones don't work before the problem is that uh there were no political reasons to wage war in europe, these political reasons have now appeared, and thanks to the deep crisis, and in the west, uh, which they cannot solve , the multi-layered peasants will now blame them and ride. and yes, probably on their problems, but uh, out of this crisis. they are trying, and to get out, including what turned out, appeared politi. t a reason for starting a big war on this cause

is that for a very long time you did not show my speeches from twenty-five years ago when i warned us that if we let's say the further expansion of nato, sooner or later, the turn of ukraine will come, and then there will be a big war. it's been going to this all the time and i deeply regret that it got there. e hmm now we need to think about how to win this war, not by allowing, but by a large thermonuclear, and if possible, not allowing any use of nuclear weapons, because, well, maybe yes, in quotation marks, successfully. i imagine that it is possible, ah, that is, to break opponents.

the use of nuclear weapons is doing, maybe this is a monstrously difficult problem for all uh people, even for me, a person who is relatively irresponsible when i think, speak, and advise. now i advise you to use nuclear weapons. even if it's rational, it might seem, uh, right. e morally , it seems almost unpleasant, but nevertheless, one must think that if the situation is not resolved now in one way or another. yes, we will have a situation in five years. the rector is even worse. uh, the movement of the west is quite obvious, it loses the completely obvious ones, if there is no severe crisis. his positions will continue. quicker

of all, it may be, mind you, it may slow down in two more, we will falter and retreat , but then it will resume anyway, india china , all the rest have already received freedom for their development due to the fact that first the soviet union and now again russia has knocked out of - under uh 500-year dominance of economy policy culture and uh, the west of the western world it. uh, deep foundation foundation superiority. it's not just nuclear weapons. this is military superiority. on the basis of this , the entire system of international relationship 5 hours. this system is now collapsing well. and where are we moving then, if now everything is collapsing the old world order,

the world order is collapsing, we are going to some e. a polycentric e polycentric system, yes, conditionally, there will be several centers of combination of centers, perhaps, which are combined depending on their tactical tasks, and when there are centers, there are outskirts, there are pockets of chaos, perhaps a stable polycentric system or not? no, yes, and these opportunities are quite stable, uh, we lived uh, a unique period uh human history when the system was relatively stable. why can't it be stable, but stabilize it. uh, maybe uh, in 15-20 years. i think based on uh, there's a balance between a number of centers. there will be a lot of peace in these centers, and most of them are next to us, and as a result of the fact that

the americans are on, well, i will partially forget, of course, people cannot for a very long time for decades they will not be able to forget about their short period of dominance, first in the the world of the nineties and two thousandths. and then it will be one new balance hmm but it will be big eurasia somewhere there will be the united states of america as before. powerfully, the power of europe, it will be, uh, unfortunately for me, europe, culturally close to us , will be marginal. uh, the new eurasia eurasia will be 5-6 cents, which will partially balance each other and all together. ah, glory to china. now the country was friendly to god. she is 20. it also needs a system. eh, the benevolent balancers

suit this body, and i'm all in all a situation that we find very much like a problem. how to live these 20 years. can you imagine that in 20 years. we will have a completely new fit world 620 years of turbulence, and then some kind of happiness yes, for real, and russia is the most multicultural, most multinational country in the world, civilization in its affairs will be e. uh, in general, the embodiment of this wonderful new world but live uh live. before this world, it is necessary, the world is going in this sense to the narrow side in the good sense of the word, polishing it, like the outskirts, the outskirts of the new world, yes, that is, ukraine is moving behind us, you know. i would like that and this must be understood, this must be understood if we get stuck in ukraine beyond the average in the west. this is a very big danger of the current conflict.