that i was in power, he still hoped to be completely legalized, to make everyone forget about their past and live the life that they had always dreamed of, but the fsb officers drove the ural leader into a trap. imagine right away, to understand more often all the time palych was born in 1973. for what it was detained no idea, that is, you don’t know your vehicle took a trip very nice than making a living this way for almost 20 years. they collected evidence of involvement will dodge by all possible means, but they smiled, arraigned, and more often in the court

session he explained that he understood the accusation. he fully agrees with him, admits his guilt in full in committing all the incriminated acts, an application for concluding a pre-trial cooperation agreement with him was filed by him voluntarily, cooperation more often with the investigation contributed to the collection of evidence of fully incriminating leaders and participants in the criminal community, as well as rodoyevsky at the time of the incriminated acts and detention of the head of administration miass city district , and also contributed to the investigation of the crimes of the past lion, committed in conditions of non-obviousness in court, more often he behaved calmly and judiciously handed over accomplices, so the term received more than a mild 13 years in a strict regime colony. criminal division quite often qualifies us as the leadership of a structural unit that is part of a criminal community, a criminal organization created to commit grave and especially grave crimes, banditry, that is, leadership. gangs created by an unarmed group for the purpose

of attacking citizens and organizations, intentional actions are directly aimed at committing murder, that is, intentionally causing death to another person, committed by an organized group for hire associated with banditry. at the same time, the murder, that is, the deliberate infliction of death on two persons of a completely organized group for hire associated with banditry, was not brought to an end due to independent, desperate circumstances , in 2025, on the fact of the murder of sidorov's student. chashchin should be released. his return is fearfully awaited by the inhabitants of not only meat, but the whole of the chelyabinsk region, however, the fsb officers are sure. their battle with the turbazovskys is not over yet, and no matter how often he hides the traces of his crimes. he will be held accountable for everything he did, regardless of the statute of limitations. gentlemen from the right

world want to rein in russia harsh language against moscow will become. uh, bad in order to make it even worse later, this is how the world works behind the scenes. i received an offer from the president of the united states for the west i will not discuss what exactly i heard from whom i hear, especially since i forgot all this, dmitry comrade does not deny participation in the belberts service. well, what kind of new world order are they preparing for us. now, in principle, there is not and cannot be, and now there is a war, a world tragedy and mobilization. one should never mix in the ability of mankind to make mistakes, including fatal ones. hello this is info shield program. i am vladimir chernyshov who owns the information, owns the world. well, the world is now controlled by fakes and manipulations today from world trends, the news is that scattering is breaking the world order, however, russia is breaking it. and what kind of order is this in our program, we will

separate the fact from the fakes in order to remain on the bright side and not succumb to the false. so russia breaks the world order, so gentlemen from the right world want to rein in russia and restore order. but what we see is, in fact, the gentlemen are talking about the true goals of no russia. there simply should not be. that's the main task with regard to ammunition stocks. a why do we need these stocks? if you are a european country, against whom will you defend yourself? why do you need them, if they help to destroy russian tanks, then for this they do not need

these ammunition. well, we are with you the goal of our tankette is simple to remove russian competitors so that the girls do not interfere with profits. well, the truth is, do you guys really feel like roman barbarians that live on the outskirts of the world once the british writer orville 1984 perestroika naive soviet people all the time said, he wrote it. soviet totalitarian system which i have never seen in reality. yes, not about the soviet system. he wrote. and about what he knows well about his own, about how it works, western propaganda is washing our citizens and the whole world declaring that war is peace. now we hear this from every second western politician war is peace. and from the secretary general. nato, too, hear some worry that our support for ukraine could run the risk of escalation. let me put it clearly there are no

options no risk but the biggest risk is if putin wins it will make the world a better place dangerous, and we are more vulnerable, so supporting ukraine is in our common security interests at the munich conference, at which in 2007 vladimir putin first pointed out to the west that it was overly confident that the polar world alone is a threat to humanity. now they definitely believed in their exclusivity. arrogance of the west it just pisses off the rest of the world. yes, who are you to establish the rules the world after the second world war was regulated by the rules of yalta under the lock, when the leaders of the victorious states established such red flags, for which they promised not to enter, however, quickly a year later, the former allies planned nuclear attacks on the ussr, but nevertheless several times the world, which was on the verge of a new war, taxied out, because

the authorities in both the east and the west were responsible people who calculated their steps subsequently had an idea about the elementary laws of geopolitics. well , in general, they still remembered the second world war. well, new generations of gynecologist ursula have grown up , leftist socialists barrel and schultz are now arming ukraine by warming up the military conflict. well, now let's see how what is happening about the information space is presented. any war to death is murder or revolution. they are held according to the words about the defense of democracy. the procession of democracy is the gallows for saddam bombs for belgrade overdue crowd decadafi democracy, in the western sense it is such a way of governing the world, which is convenient in ukraine, the nazis are zigzag. well, we'll still call it democracy, because they obey us. well, what kind of new world order is preparing for us in this world order, it will again to dominate the world, the western minority is enough to look at the map to understand the western world - it's such a small

shrunk already from europe's own sanctions and well, perhaps the usa and canada, even that south of texas - this is no longer the western world, their task is to clap their hands from the gallery obey orders, moreover, the rules of international relations, which worked with difficulty, but were effective and stubbornly destroyed the united states itself , reveling in its victory in the cold war . along with stopping the transformation of ukraine into hotspot us deployed missile defense systems eastern europe to grow or there military contingents withdrew from key treaties in the field. armament agreements on medium-range propo missiles are shorter, but moscow’s attempt to negotiate and take into account our wishes on mutual security guarantees was refused by the elite, the west does not hide their goals to inflict russia as they say, this is a direct speech strategic defeat of russia what does this mean for us what it is? it means ending us once and for all. so some of us are so bleak.

there is no picture, not even an opportunity for a constructive dialogue, but it is clear that the world order will no longer be the same. but will it look like a terrible dystopia or are there options to reformat the world in order to avoid global conflicts. that's what we'll talk about now with vladimir kobyakov. well, vladimir yuryevich, what hypothetically looming options do we have? so, what does all this lead to? let's discuss. for the sake of interest, i propose to recall the report on us intelligence community for 21 years. this is before the fighting. in ukraine, it presented five scenarios for the development of the world order for the next 20 years. it is interesting , after all, to compare with the current situation, what comes true and what does not? well, what does all this lead to? yes? let's put this cia report in there in this scenario report. well, this is not only the cia , this is a joint report of 17 departments and the cia and the state department and the nb and the fbi and other intelligence agencies. it is called global trends.

2.040 emphasized that this was all before the events in ukraine, well, look, here, uh, the first scenario of world development analysts of the us national intelligence council called the renaissance of democracy. it's the sweetest for your tonal year. the states retain their position as the by far dominant number one leader in the military's number one economy. what happened to the competitors? post -pandemic problems plus tightening the screws inside the country leads to stagnation in china and then to the fall of china from the tops, the active population, scientists flee from authoritarian china , about the same thing is happening with russia in another scenario is world bunkers. it is called in 20 years the world is divided into closed blocks in their report, and they call the bunkers with their closed economy their military alliances, even their cyber sovereign spaces, that is, the us national intelligence calls the five largest bunkers in the world in 20 years. actually, the date of china, the european union, russia and india , there are still small bunkers. these are such regional powers that will be forced

to join large systems. here is vladimir viktorovich, how do you like two of these the first scenario, the united states remains the hegemot, or everyone disperses to their bunkers. well, it seems to me that everything is going to the bunkers, because the first option is too complementary for the states it seems to me less realistic, because the united states is significantly losing, as it were, at least authority, well, the fact that there are three more scenarios ahead of the last month let's listen carefully to them here is the third scenario from us intelligence it is called a global tragedy and mobilization in 2030, the prerequisites are formed, global, catastrophes, increase temperature. marked climate change reduced crop famine in many countries, riots begin. often this leads to the overthrow of the ruling regimes, the situation in china and the united states are significantly destabilized, the role of the leader, after the global crisis, the european union takes over calls for adherence to new standards for industrial emissions, distributes products and

financial assistance, weakened by one and a half billion. china is forced to support europe in 2040 , the united states of america gradually joins the new rules a new world organization appears the security council of a person for violation of climate standards and rules is expelled from this organization by another pole that does not want to obey. becomes an oil-bearing state of russia iran and the persian gulf. well, please note that in this scenario, the americans allow the leadership of the european union. yes, hmm yes, it does, but it seems to me that such an interesting development of events in this case. let's also consider it as one of the scenarios. just out of politeness she needs an upcoming two us intelligence scenario so here's one called the drifting world. the short plot is that in 2040 china bursts into clear leaders in the economy of the military sphere in science in the united states remains in second position

, they can no longer dictate their conditions and dominate, but the political ties of the european union resist china and the united states is weakening europe is forced to take into account interests. china is the same situation with other american allies in asia moving away from japan south korea in their game resisted china but not counting on the support of washington begins play, india all in these hands are moving closer to china, analysts say over the us intelligence so. uh, vladimir ivanovich, now i have a question for you. here it is, similar to the current situation somehow. oh. what should i say volodya ok, let's move on to the fifth scenario. then we'll discuss everything. this is the latest us intelligence scenario it is called competitive coexistence. and now we will see the chinese of the united states by 2040 go head to head, with each other all the other states. they are trying to somehow maneuver between them, removing all their trading

barriers. on general terms. in this scenario , russia is said to be weakened due to low energy prices. here we are now once again remembered all five scenarios. here is the intelligence of the united states. although the report indicates that there may be black swans of our own, but we look like them, we probably already received them and the speed of events is increasing. ah, our guest is dmitry vitalyevich, a training political scientist with a very interesting biography , dmitry vitalyevich immediately asks him where are we heading? what scenario where are we going? where do we run we go? on the way it is very difficult and difficult. the internal transformation of russia and this process has long been necessary , but the impetus for it was the war in ukraine, a special military operation , what happened after it began, that war that

does not take place in ukraine and in the economic and finance in the information spheres, and so on between russia and the west . this is not only a test of russia's ability to survive and remain one of the centers of world politics, but it is also an incentive for russia to move into a new quality. in my opinion. the first post-soviet, the model of russia has exhausted their resources around the end of the tenth years, when everything will be closed or what will happen. the foreign policy lesson of the last 30 years is that russia cannot join anyone and there will not be an attempt to join the west to europe, this attempt was unsuccessful for reasons. we can discuss them. for russia

, the only and, in fact, natural way for it remains. uh, building a state of civilizations is the foundation. for this there is. i would like this and the slogan has already been proclaimed in the concept of russian foreign policy on march 31, approved president since february 22. you assumed that everything would begin to change so quickly in general in the world in february 22. i assumed i saw the scenario that i could, which was realized, but i considered it less likely than the other. but it happened the way it happened, we found ourselves in a completely new and unprecedented situation for ourselves, a country that, it turns out, is under the most powerful external pressure that we have never experienced in our history, but at the same time, we have opportunities that we also never in history was not, except for the west, there is the east and the south, and unlike the times of the cold war. not east

south lean on us. and to a large extent we will strive to develop relations with the east and not only to resist the zakud, but also to build this, the state civilization call it northern civilization, as you like, that is, we are the north, we are not the west not the east. and let me now propose to recall the biography of dmitry vitalyevich because it is very interesting, as we said, let's see. dmitriy trenin graduated from the military institute of the ussr ministry of defense at the age of 5 served as a liaison officer in the group of soviet troops in the gdr in the second half of the eighties an employee of the soviet union delegation at the talks with the united states in geneva on nuclear and space weapons in the nineties collaborated with the american analytical center carnegie foundation worked in the military nato college in rome as well as at the institute of europe of the russian academy of sciences in 2008

became the first citizen of russia that period was led by william burns, now director of the cia, now dmitry is a training researcher at the institute of world economy and international relations named after fun, and my partner vladimir gennadievich, when i refreshed your biography of his memory. in general, he was mildly surprised, you managed to work both here and there. touched new backstage. in general , as here, and then left in the biography. i'm lucky. in my opinion. i really looked, uh, at the world from different angles and probably the most in the west and here, but after february 22, and your colleagues in the center of the karna, where they, in principle, left, and you stayed. why contracted servicemen receive regional measures to support the status

of a combat veteran, exemption from land tax, compensation for payment for the service of a voucher to a sanatorium, vacation twice a year, and other benefits from the state. it's not easy here, but here everyone is united, everything is here for the sake of a common cause, everything is honest here. after february 22, and your colleagues in the center of karna, where did they, in principle, leave, and why did you stay? so why did they leave? it's their question . it's their business. yeah well, when i have my colleagues the american asked a question about what i think i'm going to do. i told them that first of all i and i am an officer of the soviet

russian army. secondly, i was and remain my people in my country. and as a matter of fact, it was all your leader directly. when you worked there, now he is the director of the cia, you are with them, by the way, you are now supporting some kind of this no , now he can’t get up, he doesn’t keep in touch. well, as you understand, in accordance with the secrecy regime in the united states, he cannot even maintain contact with many american colleagues, probably with almost all of my american colleagues, when we communicated quite often at work with him, the last time he called and told me that ah. you may be more surprised. i received an offer from the president of the united states to enter the government, he did not say. what kind of proposal, but said impossible after all.

many say it's too late. here russia has begun, and here is the path to its self-sufficient self-sufficiency to reach a new level. when did you work, in all these structures interacted with the future and current director of the cia, you felt that, uh, in fact, we have , uh, a fork has already developed from these, or there. uh, how to become in the nineties, and something like a vassal, or still a movement towards independent quotes from an interview with burns 5 years ago. he was not yet the director of the cia , he worked with you at the foundation. and putin believes that russia has the right to its own spheres of influence. well, realpolitik shows that the us cannot perceive russia as equal partner. that is, he really adhere to such views that, as it were, a split, how deep. yes

, if you want something like moscow to declare itself, then you do not have the right to do so at a time when we talked with him quite often. he was at the beginning in moscow. i met him at the moment when he was going to moscow as an ambassador, we talked a lot with him at the time when he was an ambassador, i even read his reports on these meetings in the vitilix materials. and then he became my boss, which hmm uh was some a surprise to me, but in any case, it made the communication even closer uh, you know the americans uh, they don’t consider anyone and can’t consider, uh, equal partners in their current state, well, not a single thing is strange of the cold war yes, the soviet union was equal in size adversary of the united states, but it did not become an equilibrium partner in the form

of the russian federation, therefore, the current after the end of the cold war is, uh, the current mainstream of american american foreign policy of foreign political thinking. you the same were respected among the western elite among political scientists. even, maybe still, probably, you were secretly invited to the meeting. even belberg, yes, it turns out in quality. let's just remind what a bilderberg club is for those who don't know, if we forgot now the whole masonic essence my uh everything, pull out the essence. let's see what a bilderman club is. perhaps the most famous most mysterious and most influential political club of the transatlantic elite for 3 days annually. he's gathering some incumbent presidents and prime ministers of former heads of state, top managers of transport companies such as google microsoft shell general motors , as consultants, invite experts from the world's leading think tanks to

the territory where club meetings are held. the first persons are forbidden to carry security and assistants with them. the main rule is never to say what you have heard from inside the bilderberg. some believe that this is the most closed conference of the powers that be, others believe that bezdelberg is the prototype of the western world government, which once a year run in the nearest global scenarios and discuss with closed doors oil prices, armed conflicts, new digital technologies and the global banking system. many politicians, billionaires. bankers analysts prefer not to mention, either at all. they deny their participation in the meetings of the belderberg club. here dmitry vitalievich does not deny his participation in the klubelbert. we just learn first hand how the world behind the scenes works. what kind of politics is there or is it just such a closed conference where everyone can say whatever the backstage

that rules the world thinks. tell us how there is a bookkeeping report on transport there, how it all functions. that is , i will probably tell you about them. this is always the secret question. i always know this, which is what i think it's a conference. hmm and much more exclusive, right? and where are the people of high rank, with great influence, either as acting or as former, but not retired from politics, e figures discussing what to do with the world? eh, well, here it is such a political lesser extent in the economic key, although the economy and climate and other things. e, of course, they cannot but be condemned, but first of all it is politics. first of all, it is international relations. it's not the government to discuss something you can do

whatever you want. here we are also discussing all the powers they have, they can discuss further. no. here's how much. well, of course, i will not discuss what exactly i heard, whom i heard, especially since i forgot all this. it has long been. with her , gentlemanly, as it were, yes, then be sure you still have some respect in vegas, yes, yes, but it doesn’t sag, in fact, because the west is acting, not in the way we used to think and not in the way the soviet union acted or in the central committee, where it was clear. here the central committee decided something, and the west did not go further. he operates these differently. the west

he e represents a large number of cells, e at different levels, which are connected with each other by numerous not these, and they far from all act, they do not all blow in the same dudu, they they can blow into different ones, so to speak, they succeed, yes, but they get a certain orchestra of elphony polyphony to arrange such a melody, but it’s important for them to hear important things with him. uh, what do they think? colleagues, what do people invited from outside think that bilderberg is needed so that, on the one hand, it is a club in the broad sense of the word like-minded friends, well, in the political sense of the word, friends. although they may be competitors in some areas, but uh, this is still not uh a club of people who depend on each other or on one some squatter, and in this. i think the big value of bilderberg. you talk to a nasty club, everyone hears each other, despite

the differences. the west has learned to negotiate among themselves between these cells of its large organism, but we are on the periphery. they don't even seem to want to hear from the foreign minister anymore. he made long speeches, but it felt like he was talking to the wall. they us. eh, they really don't want to listen at all. you can honestly enter into some sort of mutual relationship with them. at least we had a dialogue and some connections remained. that's what westerners say so, yes, or they only understand when the conversations are what we hear media you know the dialogue. now, in principle, there is not and cannot be, and now there is a war on the outcome, which will determine the one based, which will someday be formed. the new normal of relations with the west is the outcome of the war. i am confident that we will overcome difficulties and

problems and achieve our goals, not only in ukraine but this will not happen automatically, and we know that this is very difficult hard dangerous work that requires constant sacrifice. this is serious. this is a very serious test for us. and a biologist in these conditions. well, in principle, it is inappropriate, what actually to talk about. on the other hand , there are people who for many years. uh with each other were in a professional relationship exchanged their views on the situation, some connections. here, some channels have been closed, some connections have been broken, some connections remain. i think it's good to keep connections, but you have to understand that these connections don't represent

is not a dialogue, not the beginning of a dialogue, because today it is premature to talk about how to end the conflict in ukraine . can you talk about your goals and listen? what goals the opposite side pursues, you can exchange different scenarios, and at the same time, if you want, both sides conduct intellectual intelligence in such conversations. that's what 's happening is not dialogue. is this intelligence is very important intellectual intelligence. it is in many respects more important than such operational intelligence. yeah so what is it these conversations are going on, but this is not a dialogue. moreover, this is not a political dialogue. well, such a question directly forehead. yes, russia is now breaking the world order.