the delay in say hasan nasrullah's appearance was not ordinary, while it is true that there is aspect related to intentional ambiguity aimed at unsettling the enemy, there's another aspect related to reaching a decision regarding the course of action for the resistance in lebanon and the region in defense of palestine and in the face of israeli occupation on one hand and its western. especially american supporters on the other. what the leader of the hizbullah resistance in lebanon announced largely reflected the common perception of the entire axis of resistance. nasrola is known to be the most influential figure within the axis, possessing detailed information about all the arenas. it was his task to re-explain the reality in light of what happened in palestine from the al-aqsa flood operation to the ongoing battles in gaza as well as the american and western military build-up supporting the israeli. entity in the region.

what sayid nasrullah said on november 3rd can be described as the political preamble to new path of the resistance in lebanon will take, one that the rest of the access forces will follow. when he explicitly talked about the two goals of stopping the aggression on gaza and working to achieve victory for hamas and the resistance there, he practically set a high political bar. this means that the resistance has entered a new phase at the military operations level, which is expected in the near future. is anticipated that sayid nasrullah's second appearance later this week on the occasion of the marters day will provide an opportunity to discuss this path, the nature of the threats within it, the mechanism of action and preparing public opinion for the requirements of this stage on multiple levels. however, the most important part of his speech was spinning the us as entirely responsible for the ongoing war in gaza, stressing that america is the one preventing the cessation of aggression on gaza and rejecting any seasfire resolution and it's the americans who are running the

war, which is why as sayid nasarlah explained, the decision of the islamic resistance in iraq to attack american bases in iraq and syria is a wise and courageous decision, increasing his own resistance level of threats against the us forces, reminding them how they left beirot in the 80s with their tails between their legs. welcome to the mid stream, i'm mar osman. of popular and political reactions to the speech of hisbullah secretary general say hasan nasrullah range from those who welcomed the fact that the resistance leader did not act emotionally despite the harshness of the palestinian moment to those who acted with of disappointment because they believed or bet on more harsh positions against the occupation. let us be clear, the people.

people of gaza strip are the only ones who have the right to demand more from hizbullah of and its leader, but the matter turns into a sick joke when comments are made by people or entities that historically represent the anti-resistance line. to discuss this issue with us from beirot is dr. ibrahim musawi, member of the lebanese parliament in the loyalty to the resistance block hizbullah a pleasure to have you on with us dr. musawi. now hizbull secretary general sayan nassullah's first speech since october. seventh, the al-aqsa flot operation in gaza was described as a difficult moment speech far from emotions. do you think that this is accurate description of hisbullah's chief's speech? yes, of course, actually, thank you for giving the opportunity, first of all, of second, i mean, yes, when you are in a very sensitive and tough juncture of history, of time, of events, you depend on leaders, to

have the full judgment, the full wisdom in order to handle such matter. my understanding, which many share me, i mean is that the kind of speech that has been given by say allah after three or four weeks of the gaza aggression by the israelis, was this kind of a speech was historical, was remarkable and i'm not saying this because i want to praise say, he he does not like any praise and he is not wait. for me to praise him or anyone else, we are talking here and we have to focus a very important sensitive juncture of history and time that has to do with all of the sacrifices of the resistance, with all of the achievements of the resistance and with all of the aspirations and future plans of the resistance. say nasrallah was very clear, and the kind of threats, the kind of man is that he's directed to the israelies, which they read very carefully and thoroughly, i believe is enough. to give a full image about the kind

of events that will unfold in the future, the kind of a threat that he managed to give to the israelis and very delicate and very thorough. and in a very precise way is very important as well, and i believe those who are sitting there in their offices, taking sips of coffee or whatever, and then delivering speaches or making comments, i believe they should be respectful enough as to respect the sacrifices of the resistance everywhere. now we are talking about one resistance, we are talking about gaza, we are talking about lebanon, we're talking about all those who believe in the resistance against the operation, against the tyran. and against the world arrogance, that's why because we are in a such very sensitive moment, we should focus only on the things that should be done, secondly and most importantly, they should understand that there is a complete and continuous reaction

and coordination between the different factions and the different wings of the resistance in palestine and lebanon, in different areas, they know how to manage this, i mean we cannot leave the... for the commentators, not for myself, not for anyone, we are talking about an arena of struggle against the israelis, we are talking about an ongoing war, and when it's that leave the things to be decided to the leaders to decide it, and they know better what to do, once you have this trust, once you have this credibility, i mean we should be at ease, but dr. musasawi, as we said, the reactions were someho were with, somehow were disappointed. what were they disappointed with? what is it that they wanted hizbullah to do that would satisfy those people, whether it's in lebanon or elsewhere, despite the fact that we already said these people usually are anti-resistance, but what is the disappointment with? what do they want? look, the same people who don't want the resistance

to fight, who don't want the resistance to exist, are the harsh critics on the resistance, and they want the resistance to wage a full fledge war against the israeli. actually this is not something that could be left to the temperament and to the mood of people, here we are talking about issue that has to do, as i said earlier, to the history, achievements and to the future and aspirations and plans of the axis of the resistance, and this is not should be, it shouldn't be in any way kind of temperamental decision for this and that, the the kind of expectations that they put, why do... people feel frustrated, why do they get disappointed? because they make expectations according to their own calculations, we cannot put the resistance in a position that is according to someone's calculations or to someone's, if you want aspirations, it should

be the calculation, the precise calculation the resistance, the leaders of the resistance and the ocordination between the different parts of the resistance being very clear, what has the resistance so far? detur the israeli entity from doing the lebanese resistance? well, of course, i mean, it's evident, you can see it every day, after only one day of the resistance operation against the israelis after the 7th of october on the 8th of october, the resistance started this kind of engagement, military engagement with the israeli outposts all over the lebanese, palestinian border, you're talking about a front which extends. from nakura up to thefarchuba and shibha farms, we are talking about more than 120 kilometer length of of front and you are talking about engagements with all the different military outposts there, you're talking about having one third

the israeli army in the lebanese, palestinian front, you are talking about killing tens of israelis officers and army soldiers. and you are talking about destroy destroying lot of the equipments and targeting lot of the artillery and the tanks of the israelies that they have always bosted it is the miracle of the israeli army, so we here we are talking about an engagement that has listened the pressure on ghaza, here we are talking about a continuous battle that is taking a place and it's open for all choices and for all options any time. well um dr. musawi said nasrullah said in his speech that all options are on the table in lebanon. how do you think the uh white house or the biden administration took that? because most of his speech was against the us regime and not the israeli tool as he explained. how do you

think they responded to that? well it's very evident you know that the the americans are the one who are using israel as a tool. the israelis, mean if you talk about the seventh of... october, it took them two days to come to their senses, to have any kind of sense of judgment, to take decisions or whatever, maybe the is the american warships, the american fleet have come to the... area before the israelis made their decisions to respond or to re to to to rebattle the whole thing that happened to them on the 7th of october, here we are talking about the upper hand, the upper hand in this is for the americans, had it been for the americans, the israelis, i mean with this what's happening now would have been actually dealt another and another and another devastating blow from the palestinian and from the axis of the resistance, the kind of... the kind of hurry that and the speedy intervention of the

americans in the region in palestine in the mediterranean where they sent most of their warships here tells you lot about how fragile weak and how feeble is the israeli army and the israeli entity as a whole and the decision has been made by the americans we remember the 2006 war when the israelis wanted to stop the war in the 10th day and and the americans didn't allow them and they kept postponing this, the same is happening now, they are playing, they are making a play and in the eyes of the people that the americans are trying to seek kind of truce in order to pass certain humanitarian aid or whatever, but it seems very evident that the americans are pressing on the israeli army on the israeli military personnel in order to make any kind of achievement on the ground before the... they go into anything else, the americans are the ones who are not accepting kind of seasfire, and i tell you, these are

information, a week or 10 days ago they were about to go into a truce and to make this kind of sweep, i mean in order to free the prisoners, to free the captives, palestinian captives and to make this kind of swap, what happened is that the american intervention stopped this and freeze it, that's why... i believe, i mean sasrlallah was very clear that what we are doing here is that we're not only fighting the israelis, it's not about the israelis anymore, it's about the americans and the western alliance that has hurried in order to give a hand of aid to the israelis, definitely, which is uh why i'm i'm going to need you to stay with us, dr. musawi, ladies and gents and you too, stay with us, because right after this transition we're going to see how the us threatened to destroy lebanon.

now the white house stated that the united states does not want to see the conflict between. amas and israel expand into lebanon, this is what they said, however the u.s. escalated its own that it is unimaginable to imagine the potential devastation that would befall lebanon and its people if the conflict expands, in a direct threat to lebanon, in the event it keeps up the open confrontation with sionist israel. more details in the following report. تخيفنا ولم تخفنا في يوم من الايام وانا اقول لكم بكل صدق وصراحه ان

اساطيلكم التي تهددون بها لقد اعددنا لا عدتها ايضا. this was clear enough for the us regime to understand that all possibilities of the lebanese front escalating further are on the table. walling into a broader war is a realistic scenario that can happen in lebanon and the enemy is now taking this. into account. we must all be prepared for all forthcoming scenarios. this is how said nasrullah threatened the us regime in response to their deployment of warships and aircraft carriers in the eastern mediterranean as a way of supposedly detering hizbullah from further escalating the confrontation with israeli occupation forces at south lebanon. the uss ford carrier for instance includes nuclear reactor can hold more than 75 military aircrafts including fighter aircrafts like the f-18. for harnet jets and the e2 hawk eye, which can act as an early warning system. it has an arsenal of

missiles like the evolved sea sparrow missile, which is a medium range surface to air missile used to counter drones and aircrafts. meanwhile, the dwight isenhower carrier strike group, also known as the ike, has 500 sailors and can carry up to nine squadrons of aircrafts like fighter jets, helicopters and those capable of carrying out intelligence, surveillance and rec'. operations, much like the ford, the ike carrier will be accompanied by other ships like the guided missile cruiser philippine sea, guaded missile destroyers gravely and the mason. the us sayid nasrullah's threats seriously that they sent in their top diplomat secretary of state anthony blincon to meet with west asian leaders in amman jordan on saturday. sharp divides persisted between the united states and the arab states on their response to the israeli occupations war against gaza. blincon then concluded his short visit to tel aviv late on saturday leaving behind endless questions about what

he said to israeli entity officials behind closed doors meetings and what negotiations and agreements were reached. however, it can be estimated that the stumbling of the ground operation in gaza and the departure of the goal to crush hamas from the realm of possibility imposed itself on the visit, with some believing that this set back along with open threats from hizbullah secretary general said hasan nasrullah were two of its most significant causes. blincon's visit appears to be more of a reaction to the field results, most notably the resilience of the government. resistance, which prompted the israeli entity to freeze the ground operation in its initial phase. it also appears to be driven by the factor of time which has become pressing for the us administration, especially as there is no clear strategic horizon or results for further fighting. now we continue from beirout with dr. ibrahim musawi, member of the lebanese parliament in

the loyalty to the resistance block hizbullah. thanks again for your time dr. musawi, now before the speech hasan nasrullah the pentagon actually deployed two aircraft carriers, along with their supporting ships to the eastern mediterranean to the eastern mediterranean to supposedly support the israeli entity, yet most of the group of battleships is docking facing the coastal line of lebanon and not occupied palestine. now after the speech one us official as we heard said that the level of destruction that lebanon will see will be immense in the event hizbullah. escalates the confrontation, how seriously do you and hizbullah take those threats? well, first of all, we have to understand that when they try to wipe out ghaza from the map, when they make this kind of genocidal war against the palestinians, when they wipe out total neighborhoods with all of the families there, when they kill more than like 4000, now they are going to be

around 4000 children when they could kill 10,000 people, two thirds of them or maybe the majority of them, the sweeping majority them are children and women, this tells you how covered and how creepy they are and what kind of enemies the we are fighting, they didn't and weren't in any position to fight the palestinians like man to man or they come to ground, they are only carpet bombing gaza strip, they are only using two ton weight bombs against the residential areas and against the hospitals and this is very telling about what they want to send of message, but i'll tell you, we not be threatened, we're not, we're not going to be intimidated, we're not going to be threatened by this kind of escalation by the israelis, the existence of israel is escalation in the face of humanity, when they say that hizballah escalate or not escalate, we are

talking here about one access, they give themselves the right to come from 1000 mile abroad, bring just what you said the... craft war carriers in order to bombard the area and they put them in the mediterrean in the mediterranean, i mean close to lebanon, not to palestine, in order to tell the israelis, you go do your job against the palestinians, we will handle hizballah, this is what they said from the beginning, and they threaten. i tell you, it's not a matter of threat or whatever, we make our calculations in a very precise way, we have a leadership that has always been keen, that has always been precise, that has always been wise in order to take the... decision in the right time, the timing of everything should be in the hand of the resistance, and the kind of fight against them is miticulously and precisely calculated in the head of the resistance, and that's why we're going, we have this kind of facing, and has put all options on on the table, and they should understand very well

that they have no guarantee that things will not unfold into more escalation anytime, anywhere, that's why i believe this kind of reaction by said against the threats has been very strong and has echoed and resounded in very strong way in their ears and in their lobbies and in their offices that's why we we we pin the hopes we pin the hopes that and we are very sure that the resistance in palestine itself has not been touched we we should understand that gaza and hamas they are there and the different palestinian resistance fighters there factions they are in very strong position, what what the only thing that we see and you see and everybody is seeing is the bombardment and wiping out annihilating of civilians, the genocidal world against the children. but when you talk about military achievements, they have none, none of the achievements have been, well, as you said, the the speech of say did echo lot

in the hallways of the western decision makers, but us, which is why they actually sent in their top diplomat, us secretary of state, anthony blincon with the lebanese uh prime minister or k taker, prime minister najib miqati in jordan on saturday, and blincon stressed the importance of... ensuring that the israeli entity/hamas conflict does not spread elsewhere. now you and i, we both know that this is not why he made najib miqati fly all the way to jordan so he could meet with him. what was the message that he sent back with miqati specifically to you in hezbullah? well, look, i mean, they know very well, made it very clear that many messages have been sent through everybody, i mean everybody, you won't believe who. the people were handing the messages, but hizballah has decided not to listen to any message, you know, hizballah is in a position to calculate the things in very good way, they know well the lebanese

domestic interest, they know very well that this kind of defense is is saving lebanon that if hamas won the war in gaza, if the palestinians won the war in gaza then lebanon is victorious, is going to emerge victorious, if if hamas loses god for. and they are not going to lose and i can assure you will emerge victorious, if they if they lost the war, got forbid, you know, i mean, this is gonna be a great loss for all of the surrounding, all of the arabs, all of the muslims, all of the humanity, and more importantly importantly and particularly the surrounding regions to palestine, i mean egypt, jordan, lebanon, syria and other countries, so i mean, it's not a matter of listening to the messages or whatever, the... position is very clear, is very strong, and it's very clear, and at the same time, being amigous a little bit, the kind of constructive ambiguity that says talked about, this is a strategy by the resistance

that will keep the enemies busy, minding and managing and calculating, making their own calculations and they should continue to do it any time, but i can tell you things are very open for all options any time, well but we have seen as well throughout these three or four. weeks the us occupation bases across syria and iraq being targeted by specifically the iraqi resistance factions and some syrian resistance factions as well uh because of their support to uh zionist israel, but what is the red line that hizbullah will not allow to see us and israeli entity troops cross before fully escalating the current confrontations into a full-fledged war. what is it that might break the balance that would push hizbullah into a big war? we are. not any position to tell anything about this, all the intelligence apparatuses are in a continuous, they are seeking to understand,

to understand what is it, what's the red line? i believe they understand it and we have to let them, if you want to drawn in their calculations and not understand, the resistance, the leader of the resistance, the leadership of the resistance, has done everything in order to make the preparation for any escalation for any full fledged war that would happen or erupt in the region and they have the decision and they no want to take the decision and when they no want to carry out this religion. if we are ambiguous about this then this is because it will help in the fight that is taking place that is going on. we don't want to open up and i'm not part of the leadership, the military leadership or the leadership that takes the decision, but i understand very well that our leadership is wise enough as to clarify or not clarify the steps and the things that would be better and best suit the ongoing war

now. we have no doubt in that dr. ibrahim musawi, member of the lebanese parliament in the loyalty to the resistance block hizbullah. thanks million for your time for joining us and and i know that you gave us this exclusively after being not able to uh to join uh media uh outlets. so thank you for trusting press for your first. appearance on media after the october 7th al-aqsa flood operation. ladies and gents, thank you for watching press tv, do follow us on uh telegram and on twitter x. we promise you to always give you the latest updates from here, west asia, especially with the escalation of possible war with the zionist entity and its makers in the west. thanks again for watching and hopefully, inshallah we'll see you all next week on the midy stream.

they think they've done a good thing because they don't have to look in the eyes of these mothers who know they are going to die, who are going to die before their children's justices delivered the truth about their child who was not a gun man or a gun woman who was not someone that the british army could just take away and snuff out their life and then cover up the files and hide them away for until 2064 or 2070 those women know they're going to die without having any of truth and without any justice. chris heat and harris doesn't have to look into any of their eyes and it doesn't matter if it was the british army or the rc or the ira or loyalist that took those lives. those loved ones mattered and those families matter and what this is doing is inhumane in in an extraordinary way that no one in a developed country in 2023 should even be cognicent of.

israels the gaza's largest medical facility al shafah hospital, the fatalities from more than a month. bombardments of this street tops 10,300 two american military bases in iraq and syria come under fresh attacks atmit growing into us sentiment over its complicity in israeli atrocities. bahraine's national assembly is pressing to reverts the normalization of its relations with israel in reaction to the regime's genocide in gaza.