we feel pain, who said that we don't feel pain? we bear the difficulties, we confront any hardship, any loss, we confronted with patience, with good patience, we confronted by submitting to the will of god almighty, and being satisfied with god's. will by relying on god almighty, because we are people who believe in god and the aftermath, the next word, but this doesn't mean that we don't feel pain, in the incident of the of assassination of the commander, the marty, ismail hannah, you notice in the statement of of his eminence, the leader, he uses an expression, this assassination, made us feel

pain, and it had very big impact on the axis of resistance, meaning that when the marties and the mujahidin and the women and children are marted, we indeed do feel pain and sorrow, however, this is a different feeling, because we're human beings, because we have sympathy, 'i'm sorry, i have the flue even before the incident, now i've improved, but because we are people, normal people who have sentiments, so for this reason wst we consider hussein, may peace be upon him, the great martyr of islam, we also weep for him for more than 1,300, almost 1,400 years, and we will continue to shed tears for him until the day of resurrection'. hence, first of

all, with the families of the maries, we extend condolences over the loss of their loved ones, at the same time we congratulate them for this great end, because everyone in the end will meet death, you will die and of they will die, so if death will happen, and if the end comes, the most honorab. form of death is being killed in the cause of god, as i said in the evening lectures of ashura, that's number one, number two, regarding the incident, the enemy, i'm gonna say this of before i speak about syd fo'ad, the enemy described the aggression on southern bayrut, because what happened in southern beirout was an aggression, it wasn't only assassination, it was an aggression. let me say this from

now, number one, an aggression in southern bayrut, the southern suburbs of the capital, that's number one, number two, striking civilian buildings, not a military base or military baracks, number three, there was death of civilians who were women and children. number four, targeting a senior commander in the resistance, we have to describe this because that is related to the stats, what was the way they described this aggression, because it's an aggression, they said it was a reaction and in the days before the aggression, "they were talking about an

israeli reaction and we all have to await the israeli reaction or retaliation, and many countries interven, many of these countries are hypocritic countries, that there will be a retaliation, you have to accept the retaliation, you have to absorb the retaliation etc. and they have the right to retaliate, to what, to an allegation, which i'll speak about, we don't accept this assessment and this suscription at all, this is..." part of the current battle, ever since the establishment of this entity, ever since the first massicers in 1947 and 1948 in occupied palestine and in south lebanon and elsewhere in other locations in south lebanon, this is part of the israeli zionist american war on palestine and lebanon and syria and the region and the people this is

part of the war, part of the battle, so they describe it as a retaliation which i'll talk about, this is... deception and hypocrisy and these are lies, that's number one, number two, and i'll go back to this in detail when i speak about the sayid, number two, they said this is a retaliation and they described our senior commander the described him as the person there was a missile which landed in that village. we categorically

denied any responsibility regarding this incident, and we have the courage to say that if we bombedd any place. "we take responsibility, even if it was by mistake, because some people said maybe they made a mistake, even if we did make a mistake, we would admit to it, and we've done this on various occasions in the past, past, however, our internal investigation, our accurate investigation led us to this conclusion, we didn't issue the statement immediately, we waited for hours until we made sure" on our side, however, it's very unfortunate that the enemy quickly pointed the fingers and appointed themselves as a judge and also as the person or as the party that inflicts punishment and didn't provide any evidence,

and of course the americans and the west and some of the arab media outlets, the ugly outlets went ahead with them and promoted this allegation and and this allegation had a goal because the second assumption which was clear and many strategic military strategic experts and also they relied on it and relied on the denial of the accusition by the resistance. the second assumption is that an interceptor missile landed in? actually israel cannot accept this, bearing in mind that we have lot of proof whereby interceptor missiles landed in haka and infa and in

various places and led to israelis being wounded and to burning israeli markets. they didn't deny here, when they saw that there were children, there's golden heights and drews, this is also important, they quickly accuse the resistance, in any case, first of all, it's my duty to underscore today that this accusation is unjust and unacceptable and rejected, and it has a goal, and it's deceatful, of course, it aims not to provide a cover. to kill say or to launch an aggression on the southern bayrut, they don't need excuse, no justification, however they took advantage of this accusation, but the main goal behind the accusation, first of all is to make the enemy's army look innocent,

because at that time there were confrontations on the border, and the large number of interceptor missiles were launched, the large number, number two: sedition, sedition, between the people of the golen heights along with all of their beloved from the honorable jews sect and the resistance and especially the shiah sect, this was a goal, and of course the israeli enemy and those who stand behind this enemy. "they look at the region today because one of the most important results of storm and the supportive battlefronts and the honorable stances taken by leaders and by parties and political and religious leaders and various other figures is that they contributed to very large extent

to overcoming the sectarian divisions which they tried to magnify over the..." they have to revive this sectarian conflict. and i said in ashhura that they will focus on this now and especially after the end of the battle in al storm, but thank god almighty, and due to the vigilance, the vigilance on the one hand, and the wisdom and the decisive stances which came from a group of political and spiritual leaders, senior figures from the... drews from the honorable sect in lebanon and in syria and in the golden heights itself, the

syrian occupied gollen heights, these stances and these statements, in addition to what was expressed in many occasions, the popular stance in the golden heights, the expulsion these zinest killers, there's those officials who came to the gollan heights, this helped to prevent sedition, to obstruct, sedition, it also helped in defending against the unjust accusation made towards the resistance, and here it's my duty to extend my thanks to these political and spiritual leaders from this honorable sect for this stands. in the same framework, on behalf of all of you, it's my duty also to extend my condolences to the families of in this

painful incident, and we pray that god gives them patience and to have mercy on them all. actually, the aggression on southern beirot was not a retaliation as the israelis alleged, as i said, it's part of the war, number one, number two, yes. "it comes within the framework of making us pay the price or response to the lebanese supportive battlefront, they said it again, they want to take advantage, it's not enough for netanyahu to take advantage of killing a leader, as senior and sayid just for majd al shams, he wants to take advantage of this in the northern front and in the public opinion, in his society who is holding him responsible for the failure, so he wants to present achievements, so for this reason then..." yes, here we are paying the price for our

support, our supportive battlefront for ghazza, we are paying the price for our support for gazza and for the palestinian people, and for us embracing the palestinian cause, and for us defending the sanctities, that's true, and that's not not the first price we've paid in this battle. we've had up until now hundreds of marties, the mujahidin, the civilians, and some of those marties were senior commanders whom i spoke about before, and i said, this is a price which we accept, and we pay, and today and the is with him in, they are a price which we accept and which we pay, because in this battle... we enter this battle stemming from faith, faith in the

human cause, in the ethics of this battle, in the righteousness of it, in the legitimacy of it, and all dimensions, and when we enter this battle, all of us, not just the martes on the frontlines, everywhere now, for us. we're in lebanon now in syria, all of us, the most senior figures and the others, our leaders, our fighters, our families, our supporters, these masses, all the supporters of resistance, all resistance movements, hasballah, the amal movement, the nationalist party, the jamah islamiah and all of the others, we all when we decided to enter and when we coordinated in the... battle, we were sacrificing our blood, putting ourselves at

risk, as i said, when the martin of place, this applies everyone, they put their lives on the line, they put their lives on the line, so we were not surprised, and we will not be surprised with any price we could pay, and deserves such heavy prices, some people up until now, up until this moment, after 10 months of fighting, discuss and they haven't understood the essence of this conflict, the real nature of this battle, the true nature, they haven't understood the horizon of the battle yet, its dangers, its results, its repercussions, it strategic great historic repercussions, which will lead to the entity

or palestine lebanon, which will draw the draw the future course for these players, either in defeat or victory, they... still have narrow-minded approach, but actually no, we are witnessing major battle, it's no longer about supportive battle fronts, there's a battle in gaza, there's a battle in south lebanon, there's an open battle in yemen, and even in iraq, because all of this is taking place simultaneously. yemen and also yesterday or day before in iraq was bombed and the leader ismail was killed in tahran and the commander was killed in southern bayrut, so these are no longer fronts, it's an open battle on all fronts,

and it's entered a new phase, no doubt that the aggression. the unique heroic operation carried out by unsar allah and the yemani army the drone and after the assassination of the leader ismail these people are stupid the zionists really they can't see in front of them this arrogance which the quranic verses referred to this leads to one no longer thinking straight so they think that they kill the leaders in tehran and they expect that iran will be silent, the tone of the statement of his eminence, the leader, may god preserve him, is stronger and more stern than his statement and his speech on the day the aggression on the iranian consult in damascus and the marinum of the command, it's

more stern iran, the islamic republic. what we heard from his eminence, the imam, the leader in the statement and in the speech, and from his excellency, the president of the republic, from the leaders of the orary guards, from the foreign ministry, from all the iranian officials, the iranians believe that it's not only about their sovereignty, in the iranian consulate in damascus, they considered that their sovereignty. has been attacked because the consulat and the embassy is part of iranian territory, but when they speak about an assassination of the leader, the mati haniah, they speak about their sovereignty, and number two, their national security, and number three, their prestige,

and number four, and this is what the israelis must understand, who still don't understand the... honor has been attacked and you know what honor means now the west and others they don't understand honor and these other concepts but let them understand these terminologies now one time they say you attacked our sovereignty that has a certain approach our security our national security our prestige but what are they saying now now they're saying you attacked our you assaulted our honor because the leader the... was our guest and you killed our guest in the east and especially in the islamic world, this is a completely different story which requires a completely different approach, so this is really mindset, and for the society of this entity which was joyful for few days, no doubt, now they're in a state of joy, and

they're proud of themselves that in a few hours we called. and so they can't see in front of them because they're so proud, okay, laugh a bit and you weep lot, because because you don't know what red lines you have crossed and what kind of aggression you carried out and where you've taken the... we for the enemies and the friends on all of these supportive battlefronts, now we've

entered new phase, different than the previous phase. and "the escalation depends on the behavior of the enemy and the reactions of the enemy, today they are the ones who have to wait to w to await the rage the honorable people, the revenge of the honorable people in the ummah, for all of this blood, it's a pressed blood, that's on the one hand, now i'll speak about this." in the end, on the other hand, we have to underscore that any goal of assassination, we prevent this goal from being achieved in the

end, the imati got what he wanted to, but we obstruct the goal usually the goal behind assassinating a commander, whether it be a military commander, security, political leaders, jihadis, intellectuals, etc. is to try and undermine the determination of the wider group to undermine its decision making, the aim is to intimidate, to weaken so that they would back down to stop, to weaken, to go into a state of submission, that's usually the case when they kill our leaders or the leaders of resistance movements and others. up until now, in any case, even in the entity, many people told netanyahu, okay, you're happy now, but if you continue, will

they stop resistance? no, will it weaken the resistance? according to experience, it won't, and we'll pay the price. so what i want to say is that even some of the observers and the analysts and the zionist commentators understand this fact? this is fact, for example, if we look at hamas today. now hamas, its founding leader leader was mari, sheikh ahmed yasin and leading figures in it. and other maries and the marties, jihadies, yahyash and others. and now, they're depending on killing the leading commander or they putting their hopes on killing muhammad, the leader. in order to also make an achievement. so hamas, it's always, what is it trajectory, it's always upward, it's strengthening more and more the

islamic jihad, the commander who founded the first secret general, doctori, they killed him, what's the trajectory of the islamic jihad, it's upward, so here we have, they killed our leaders, our secretary general, they killed our great. they killed many people, what's the trajectory, what's our trajectory, it's upward, so history tells us that this goal will not be achieved, why? because these parties that were targeted, believe in god and the next world and the general approach and the message, and these parties are ready sacrifice with what is most valuable? to them and belong to a historic legacy, a great legacy which provides it with spiritual and moral energy, great energy and

the great capability to put up with the hardships and difficulties and sacrifices and pains. otherwise, how can you explain the families of the marties? and how do you explain this legendary steadfasters of the people of gazza and south lebanon and the people? of our region for 76 years, that is the explanation, the same applies to us, as i said, we felt great pain over them of say, however, this will not undermine our will or determination or our decision making or our determination and continuing on the same path, on the contrary, this will only, as i always said with the previous leader. leaders, this will increase our determination and commitment and will, and our proceeding forward and will not change anything whatsoever, on the contrary, this makes us

more strongly cling to the decision which we took here in this location because they haven't seen the saying haven't seen his face like many other marties our martes from the jihadis you get to know them after their martim sayid sometimes used to come at some nights to this location or to the place where the... and today as we speak and as we gather around him, he stood with you and raised his hands with you, when we used to say to hussein, may peace be upon him, if we knew that we would be killed and then burnt and

then hang in the air then be brought back to life and then killed. if this is done to us 70 times or 1ous times, we will not abandon you. sayid was with you, his voice was raised high with you, saying i wouldn't abandon you hussain. they say that you indeed chanted slogans from your heart and you have wished hussein may peace be upon him and we are with you continuing on that same path committing to this pledge they say this would disrupt the structure we thank god almighty we have leaders and we have generations of leaders

now because we got all together, i speak with some brothers, maybe we feel that we're still young, but many of our leaders are now in the 50s and the 60s, etc., those used to be young, the sayid, he started, he started fighting the enemy when he was 20, 21 years old, and the same applies to our leaders, any, i want to reassure especially this the students of those commanders, these students of and the others, we have an excellent.