sinus roll knows all to well that yahya sanwar understands it better that it understands him crafted. by zinist detention

centers sinwar holds a powerful symbolic presence in the israeli entity psychee. following the lunch of operation al-aqsa flood, numerous israeli entity security officials have come forward to share their experiences about sanwar. across the board, israeli entity commentators have described sinoir as exceptionally intelligent, remarkably tough, and most importantly master organizer who deeply understands the israeli entity mindset. in any... context, it's impossible to separate the trajectory of the genecal war on gaza and the resilience of the resistance from hamas's decision to appoint yahya sanwar to lead the movement at this very critical and strategic juncture both in the history of the organization and the palestinian revolution. analysts view this decision as a bold challenge to azinis israel, as if hamas is telling the israeli entity, if you assassinated the man, some of your politicians labeled as moderate, we've brought you the toughest, most stubborn,

battle-hardened and radical leader in hamas. hamas's decision also signals that its leadership structure and organizational capacity have been swiftly restored despite the damage caused by hannah's assassination. it sends a clear message that the movement remains united and fully capable of selecting a leader for its political bureau. according to hamas's internal structure, the movement a is governed by a shura system with three key regions: abroad, led by khalid mishal, the west bank, previously led. by the martered sheikh salih and now by his deputy zaharbarin and gaza under the leadership of yahya sinwar. the selection of yahya sinwar, a man zionist israel has failed to eliminate, sends a powerful message. zionist israel's tactics of pressuring the leadership by targeting their families, as they did with haniye, or attempting to weaken the movement by assassinating its leaders, will not break hamas's resolve. now, the most wanted man in tel aviv, whom they couldn't reach during the war is lead. the movement right from the

battlefield. one of hamas's key messages here is that the mantle of resistance leadership lies in gaza, placing the military and organizational weight in its hands. yahya sinwar is seen as the most capable leader to guide the movement through one of the greatest battles in palestinian history. welcome to the mid stream, i'm mar osman. about a week after the marturdom of ismail han, the head of the political bureau of the islamic resistance movement hamas, the movement surprised the world by selecting yahya sinwar as his successor. israeli entity authorities described the selection of sanwar as message to zionist israel that he is alive and that the leadership of hamas and gaza is strong, resilient and here to stay. to discuss this issue... with us from beirot is

mr. saleh abuizza, geopolitical analyst originally from jane in the occupied west bank. a pleasure having you with us. mr. saleh, now how does yahya sinwar's leadership and strategic approach reflect a shift in hamas's operational and tactical capabilities, especially in the uh recent military engagements and the ongoing genocide in gaza? firstly, the presence of commander yahya.

most crucial point is that the palestinian resistance is integral part of a broader axis known as the axis of resistance. commander does not view this relationship as merely tactical or based on interests. rather, he believes that hamas and the palestinian resistance in all its forms should be genuinely embedded within the access. his belief in these principles, combined with his presence in gaza. affirms a strategy that, while not entirely new, is increasingly robust and resolute in confronting the new reality post 7 october. well, mr. saleh,

there's a very important question that's being asked about the role of mr. yahya sanwar here. what is swar's appointment signal about hamas's internal dynamics to begin with and his? resilience in the face of the constant israeli entity pressure, particularly concerning the ability of hamas to maintain a united front and effective leadership, because we all know how difficult the situation in gaza is at the moment. in my view, structure and its sura based system play a significant role in maintaining the movement's unity, internal cohesion and resilience.

so you're telling us that uh mr. senward will have an impact on the future diplomatic negotiations and the military uh strategies

as well, but how will he be able to balance those two, knowing that he might be assassinated any point? it is essential to clarify that the leader of hamas is not isolated from the broader leadership of the movement. while yahya sinwar stands at the head of hamas's political bureau, he does not embody the entire political bureau himself. there are other members and deputies, both within the occupied territories, such as those managing affairs in the prisons, the west bank and al quds, as well as in external regions. although leads on the ground. plays a significant role in overseeing both political and military activities alongside the military leadership of them brigades and other resistance factions in gaza, there are key figures who align closely with his approach and management of the conflict. for instance, dr. khalil, who was previously

senar's deputy before the lighter was elected head of the political bureau, exemplifies this alignment. when it comes to negotiations with the israeli occupation, i believe that israel has come to realize that the palestinian negotiator it dealt with in the early 1990s is not the same as the one it faces in 2024. zionist israel has had experience in negotiations. over the course of several wars, i'll be at short rounds lasting only few weeks, sinward has demonstrated remarkable skill and acumin in managing these conflicts. i believe he will succeed in handling the current struggle, both politically and militarily. we are witnessing the resilience of the palestinian resistance, despite the fact that 10 months have passed since the onset of the israeli entity aggression on gaza. this endurance can be attributed first and foremost to the wise leadership of the resistance in gaza as well

as to the support provided by allied military fronts such as hazballah and lebanon, the yemani armed forces and the islamic resistance in iraq. additionally, there are significant political and diplomatic backing from the islamic republic of iran and the syrian arab republic. المتمثله بالجمهوريه الاسلاميه في ايران والجمهوريه العربيه. yeah, well, i want to thank you very much, mr. salh abuzza, j political analyst uh for joining us today to talk about uh, how the appointment of mr. yahya sinward will change or impact the military and the negotiation strategies in gaza. thank you very much for your time, ladies and gents, please stay tuned because next we are going to talk about the us's grand scheme in protecting zinist israel.

the united states of america is intensifying its efforts to rescue zinus israel from a dire situation facing potential violent attacks, probably from hizbullah, from iran, from yemen, and from other forces in the region. washington is now promoting a prisoner swap and a temporary cease fire as some sort of a step towards ending the israeli entity genocide in gaza. this move aims to undermine the resistance's justification for any retaliation, deviously suggesting that any such response could derail the peace process and deny gaza the chance for sease fire and a relief. from civilian suffering. more details in the following report. the united states of

america is ramping up its efforts to assist zionist israel which faces the threat of intense attacks from iran, lebanon, yemen, and other resistance states and factions. so far, washington strategy involves three key approaches. number one, facilitating a prisoner exchange and temporary cease fire to help end the israeli entities genocide on gaza. this move aims. to undermine the justification for retaliation from regional resistance groups and from the islamic republic of iran, suggesting that any such response could disrupt the peace process and prevent gaza from securing sease fire and alleviating civilian suffering. number two, intensifying diplomatic efforts with iran and regional resistance groups through intermediaries, using a mix of threats and limited incentives to persuade these forces to avoid substantial retaliation or limit their responses to money. actions: number three: building a military coalition with zionist israel, western allies and regional

arab normalizing partners to prepare for potential attacks. this includes strategies for early detection and interception with theoretical readiness for preemptive strikes against resistance targets or iran, while currently excluding direct action against iran in the near term. admit the potential for the conflict escalate into a regional confrontation, the united states, egypt and qatar... are exploring a possible solution through a swift deal to achieve seasfire. recent developments indicate that the us has been informed by qatar that it can no longer exert pressure on hamas following the assassination of hamas's political leader ismail hanye in tehran. similarly, egypt has reiterated its position in light of yahya sanwar's election as hamas leader and has informed siinius israel that it will not abandon the rafah border crossing. the new initiative by the us, egypt and qatar is grounded in the shared conviction that ending the gaza genocide is crucial for reducing regional tensions and avoiding further

escalation. it also seeks to appease the resistance access by offering a chance to halt the war. presenting this as a preferable option compared to retaliating for the assassinations of leaders ismail hanye and fuad shukr. the us is warning that it will impose additional economic sanctions on iran if the islamic republic follows through its threat to retaliate for the assassination of ismail hanye. this stance sends dual message. one to iranian president about the economic and governmental stability costs of any attack on sign israel and another two israeli entity prime minister benjamin netanyahu signaling that washington is not. not currently considering involvement in a regional war, even if iran launches a significant revengeful assault. instead, the us will focus on defensive measures such as detection and interception, along with political and international support, and additional economic sanctions on tehran. now to discuss this issue with us from beirot is dr. daniel yagich, geopolitical commentator, a pleasure having you with us, dr. yagich,

now how do you think the us's strategies including the proposed prisoner swap and the... temporary cease fire aims to influence the dynamics of the conflict between zionist israel on one part and uh gaza on the other and what impact might these measures have on the regional resistance as well which has promised a retaliation against zinanis israel for assassinating ismail hanye and uh commander fuad shukr. so if we look at um the developments over the past more than 10 months uh it is very clear that the only strategy that the united states has been following very aggressively. is to shield the israeli regime from accountability and to make sure that it can continue to carry out this genocide without any interruption. so when we look at the um cease fire talks, there is lot of talk about these talks, but actually it hasn't led to any end, while of course the israeli regime continues to carry out those massacres and to kill palestinians

um as we speak, so the entire premise of these stocks is very much based on an... balanced uh structure. now what could this mean for the resistance? of course, the resistance has made it very clear that there cannot be any deescalation or sessation of hostilities as long as this genocide uh continues. so from that perspective, this um sort of diplomatic um discursive level that we've seen um has helped the israely regime actually to to gain time and to con to carry out this genocide. at the same time the israeli regime has killed the other side, involved in those negotiations so making very clear that there is not only not an interest from the israeli side to stop this geneside uh but also no reason to do so because it has been able uh to commit all of these crimes for over 10 months with the full backing of the united states which shouldn't be seen as um uh which actually should be seen as part

of this genocide because it has been enabling it well uh dr. yagij it's it's very interesting. me to see how the negotiation table will look like at the moment, because we all heard how qatar was saying that i cannot pressure hamas anymore because you killed their leader, egypt saying, "i'm not going to give up that of a border," and now you have new leader of hamas. how do you think the shape of this deal would be or the negotiating table at least, because swar already said that, look, we have set of uh points, you either agree to them, or we're just leaving the negotiations, how do you think that will turn out eventually? well, continue to be of course very difficult given these very imballent structures that these uh negotiations are based on, and of course the assassination of haniya has made it clear once again that the israelies are not interested in uh finding solution for path towards um the cease fire so it will continue uh to to be difficult and at the same time of course the entire conversation about um the

ceasefire in itself should be alarming because now over 10 months into this genocide, there hasn't been any stronger response from the so-called international community, no intervention on behalf of palestinians, no sanctions against the israeli regime, no how to arm sales, so in the end the ceasefire negotiations in themselves or prospective cease fire um is also not necessarily an end uh to this genocide, so from this perspective, um, regardless of the current dynamics of these talks, it will continue to be very difficult, and of course we need to keep in mind that hamas had previously agreed uh to a cease fire which had been rejected by the israeli regime, and 11 times in specific, they agreed 11 times and israel just reneng, exactly, because the israeli regime um knows very well that it can continue, there's no red line and it can continue to kill uh and massacre

palestinians while pretending to be interested in a cease fire, so the entire conversation within the... so-called international community shifting toward the cease fire is in itself very alarming and just uh allows the israeli regime to continue. well uh there are the implications audaciously if i may that the us wants to impose new sanctions, economic sanctions against iran if it retaliates. this is beyond hypocritical, be very honest, and they're doing all of these threats while zinus israel was committing new massacre at the tabin school in the central uh in centr gaza taking away the lives of at least 150 civilians, but how do you think that stands from the united states of america might affect the us-iran uh relationship and uh, which is... obviously not good to begin with, as well as the maybe broader regional landscape. i mean, these threats of sanctions just once again show

that the united states doesn't have any other option, and it just adds more sanctions to continuous sanctions that the united states has been issuing against iran as a form of economic warfare and coersion over the decades, one might even wonder how many more sanctions can there uh be placed at this point, and this is very much... part of the us very aggressive uh foreign policy uh in this region and of course at the center of the us foreign policy and one could even argue at the center of their political identity is the israeli regime the zionist entity and it's continuous settler colonial conquests so um at the end of course iran which is a leading voice and forest within the resistance continues to post major uh threat alongside with its allies in the region against israeli regime and so of course it is not surprising that it will continue to face these sanctions and accusations of terrorism and be labeled um as the enemy, so from this perspective, it is

very much expected uh from the united states to to continue to exert as pressure, and at the same time of course uh the sanctions themselves are a part of the reason why the resistance throughout the uh region has become so significant and strong uh throughout. the decades and we also need to keep in mind that the us, not only its involvement in western asia, but its global standing a global scale has increasingly been damaged by the continuous support, in particular by the biden regime uh of this genocide, so i think the power or anyth the say of the us uh is is going to continue to the quine in western asia, well in one minute the big question dr. yage, do you think... the region is going towards an all-out war or possibly end of the genocide in gaza? it's difficult to predict, but unfortunately the israeli regime has shown that it doesn't have

any restraint and that knows no red line, so from that perspective it is clear the israeli regime is going to continue to kill, to provoke and escalate with the assassinations in the last week, being just the latest example of how willing the israeli regime is to risk a broader escalation, the resistance has shown lot of patience. and restrained, but at the end of the day uh questions about the region are also answered in washington dc and beyond. so unfortunately it is of course very possible that with the continuous us zionist aggression that the region might be torn even further into a broader colonial and once again imperialist warfare against the people of the region. well, dr. daniel yagich, geopolitical commentator, thank you very much for your analysis. for uh the upcoming wave uh of possible new violence in the region because of the continuous uh genocide on gaza by zin a sisual aided, ebated and funded by the united states of

america and its friends. ladies and gents, thank you very much for watching us right here uh on the media stream, please do follow us on telegram and on x and we promise to always get you the latest right here from west asia on press tv is the medies stream salam alaikum. the kingdom of morocco and the israeli aparthy regime agreed on december 10, 2020 to normalize. relations in a deal broker with the help of the administration of former us president donald trump, now this deal was betrayal of morocco's historical commitment

to the palestinian cause. despite chief opposition by moroccans, the monarchy is entrenching this betrayal by signing military and security deals with the israeli regime. in the most recent move, this north african kingdom plans to acquire a satellite from the israeli genocidal regime in a shameful one billion dollar deal,

press tv headlines this hour israeli occupation forces kill more palestinian women and children across the gaza strip and the west bank. iran's leader warns the nation about the enemy's psychological warfare that is aimed at intimidation and submission to pressure. also the iranian un envoy warns that israel aims to weaken the palestinians a struggle for freedom and independence by itself.