zinus israel knows all too well that yahya sinwar understands it better that it understands him. crafted by zinus detention centers sinwar holds a powerful symbolic presence. in the israeli entity psychee. following the launch of operation al-aqsa flood, numerous israeli entity security officials have come forward to share their experiences about senoir. across the board, israeli entity commentators have described sinwar as exceptionally intelligent, remarkably tough, and most importantly, master organizer who deeply understands the israeli entity mindset. in any context, it's impossible to separate the trajectory of the genicidal war on gaza and the... resilience

of the resistance from hamas's decision to appoint yahya sanwar to lead the movement at this very critical and strategic juncture, both in the history of the organization and the palestinian revolution. analysts view this decision as a bold challenge to zianis israel, as if hamas is telling the israeli entity, if you assassinated the man some of your politicians labeled as moderate, we've brought you the toughest, most stubborn, battle-hardened and radical leader in hamas. hamas's decision. also signals that its leadership structure and organizational capacity have been swiftly restored despite the damage caused by hannia's assassination. it sends a clear message that the movement remains united and fully capable of selecting a leader for its political bureau. according to hamas's internal structure, the movement is governed by a shura system with three key regions: abroad, led by khalid mashal, the west bank, previously led by the martered sheikh salih and now by his deputy zahar. and

gaza under the leadership of yahya sinwar. the selection of yahya sinwar, a man zionist israel has failed to eliminate, sends a powerful message. zianist israel's tactics of pressuring the leadership by targeting their families, as they did with haniye, or attempting to weaken the movement by assassinating its leaders, will not break hamas's resolve. now, the most wanted man in tel aviv, whom they couldn't reach during the war is leading the movement right from the battlefield. one of hamas's key messages here is: that the mantle of resistance leadership lies in gaza, placing the military and organizational weight in its hands. yahya sinwar is seen as the most capable leader to guide the movement through one of the greatest battles in palestinian history. welcome to the medies stream.

about a week after the marturdom of ismail hanye, the head of the political bureau of the islamic resistance movement hamas, the movement surprised the world by selecting yahya sanwar as his successor. israeli entity authorities described the selection of sanwanda as message to zionist israel that he is alive and that the leadership of hamas and gaza is strong, resilient and here to stay. to discuss this issue with us from beirot is mr. saleh abuizza, geopolitical analyst originally from g mean in the occupied west bank a pleasure having you with us mr. salh now how does yahya sanwar's leadership and strategic approach reflect a shift in hamas's operational and tactical capabilities, especially in the recent military engagement the ongoing genocide in gaza. firstly, the presence of commander yahya sinwar in the gaza strip specifically, rather than in another region or area designated.

the fourth and perhaps most crucial point is that the palestinian resistance is an integral part of a broader axis known as the axis of resistance. commander does not view this relationship as merely tactical or based on interests. rather he believes that hamas and the palestinian resistance in all its forms. should be genuinely embedded within

the access, his belief in these principles combined with his presence in gaza, affirms a strategy that, while not entirely new, is increasingly robust, there's a very important question that's being asked about the role of mr. yahya sanwar here, what is sanwar's appointment signal about hamas's internal dynamics to begin with, and his resilience in the face of the constant israeli entity pressure, particularly. concerning the ability of hamas to maintain a united front and effective leadership, because we all know how difficult the situation in gaza is at the moment. in my view, hamas structure and its sura based

system play a significant role in maintaining the movement's unity, internal cohesion, ومن جانب اخر يجعلها دائما موحده في علاقاتها. framework not only preserves its internal solidarity, but also ensures consistency in its relationships with allies and in its approach to adversariesات the presence of commander yahya sinwar at the helm of hamas signifies, above all that we are dealing with a formidable negotiator in the face of israeli.

a strong stance against the occupation while simultaneously employing rationality and wisdom in managing the... it with a escalation or a preliminary step toward comprehensive liberation, sinward approaches high degree of capability in confronting the

confrontation is seen as a prolonged occupation and in fostering genuine alliances that support palestine and gaza. will have an impact on the future diplomatic negotiations and the military strategies as well, but how will he be able to balance those two, knowing that he might be assassinated any point? it is essential to clarify that the leader of hamas. is not isolated from the broader leadership of the movement. while yahya sinwar stands at the head of hamas's political bureau, he does not embody the entire political bureau himself. there are other members and deputies both within the occupied territories, such as those managing affairs in the prisons, the

west bank and al quds, as well as in external regions. although sinward leads on the ground and plays a significant role in overseeing both political and military activities. alongside the military leadership of thein khassam brigades and other resistance factions in gaza, there are key figures who align closely with his approach and management of the conflict. for instance, dr. khalil, who was previously deputy before the lighter was elected head of the political bureau, exemplifies this alignment. when it comes to negotiations with the israeli occupation, i believe that israel has come to realize that the palestinian negotiator it dealt with in the early 19. sinad assumed leadership of hamas and gaza. over the course of several wars, i'll be at short rounds lasting only few weeks. sinward has

demonstrated remarkable skill and acumin in managing these conflicts. i believe he will succeed in handling the current struggle, both politically and militarily. the resilience of the palestinian resistance, despite the fact that 10 months have passed since the onset of the israeli entity aggression on gaza, this endurance can be attributed, first and foremost, to the wise leadership of the resistance in gaza, as well as to the support provided by allied military fronts such as hazballah and lebanon, the yemen armed forces and the islamic resistance in iraq. additionally, there are significant political and diplomatic backing from the islamic republic of iran and الاسلاميه. well, i want to thank you very much, mr. j. political analyst. uh for joining us today to talk about uh how the appointment of mr.

yahya sunward will change or impact uh the military and the negotiation strategies in gaza. thank you very much for your time. ladies and gents, please stay tuned because next we are going to talk about the us's grand scheme in protecting zinist israel. the united states of america is intensifying its efforts to rescue ziness israel from a dire situation facing potential violent attacks probably from hisbullah, from iran, from yemen, and from other forces in the region. washington is now promoting a prisoner swap and a temporary ceasefire as

some sort of a step towards ending the israeli entity genocide in gaza. this move aims to undermine the resistances justification for any retaliation, deviously suggesting that any such response could derail the peace process and deny gaza the chance for a cease fire and a relief from civilian suffering. more details in the following report. the united states of america is ramping up its efforts to assist zionist israel which faces the threat of intense attacks from iran, lebanon, yemen, and other resistance states and factions. so far, washington strategy involves three key approaches. number one, facilitating a prisoner exchange and temporary cease fire to help end the israeli entities genocide on gaza. this move aims to undermine the justification for retaliation from regional resistance groups and from the islamic republic of iran, suggesting that any such response could disrupt the peace process and

prevent gaza from securing sease fire and alleviating civilian suffering. number two, intensifying diplomatic efforts with iran and regional resistance groups through intermediaries, using a mix of threats and limited incentives to persuade these forces to avoid substantial retaliation or limit their responses to minor actions. number three: building a military coalition with zionists. israel, western allies and regional arab normalizing partners to prepare for potential attacks. this includes strategies for early detection and interception with a theoretical readiness for preemptive strikes against resistance targets or iran, while currently excluding direct action against iran in the near term. admit the potential for the conflict escalate into a regional confrontation, the united states, egypt and qatar are exploring a possible solution through a swift deal to achieve seasfire. recent developments indicate that the us has been informed by qatar that it can no longer exert pressure on hamas following the

assassination of hamas's political leader ismail hanye in tehran. similarly, egypt has reiterated its position in light of yahya sanwar's election as hamas leader and has informed scientists israel that it will not abandon the rafah border crossing. the new initiative by the us, egypt and qatar is grounded in the shared conviction that ending the gaza genocide is crucial for reducing regional tensions and avoiding further escalation, it also seeks to appease the resistance access by offering a chance to halt the war, presenting this as a preferable option compared to retaliating for the assassinations of leaders ismail hanye and fuad shukr. the us is warning that it will impose additional economic sanctions on iran if the islamic republic follows through its threat to retaliate for the assassination of ismail hanye. this stance sends dual messages, one to iranian president masud bazeshkian about the economic and government. stability costs of any attack on zinast israel, and another to israeli entity prime

minister benjamin netanyahu signaling that washington is not currently considering involvement in a regional war, even if iran launches a significant revengeful assault. instead, the us will focus on defensive measures such as detection and interception, along with political and international support, and additional economic sanctions on tehran. now to discuss this issue with us from beirot is dr. daniel, geopolitical. tatator, a pleasure having you with us, dr. yagich, now how do you think the us strategies including the proposed prisoner swap and the temporary cease fire aims to influence the dynamics of the conflict? between zianist israel on one part and uh gaza on the other and what impact might these measures have on the regional resistance as well which has promised uh a retaliation against israel for assassinating ismail hanye and uh commander faad shukr? so if we look at um the developments over the past more than 10 months, it is very clear that the only strategy that the united states has been

following very aggressively is to shield the israeli regime from accountability and to make sure that it can't continue to carry out this uh genocide without any interruption, so when we look at the um cease fire talks, there is lot of talk about these talks, but actually it hasn't led to any end, while of course the israely regime continues to carry out those massacres and to kill palestinians um as we speak, so the entire premise of these stocks is very much based on imbalanced uh structure, now what could this mean for the resistance of course? resistance has made it very clear that there cannot be any deescalation or sessation of hostilities as long as this genocide uh continues so from that perspective this um sort of diplomatic um discursive level that we've seen um has helped these really regime actually to to gain time and to continue uh to carry out this genocide at the same time the israeli

regime has killed the other side uh involved in those negotiations so making very clear that there is not only not an interest from the israeli side to stop this genocide uh but also no reason to do so because it has been able uh to commit all of these crimes for over 10 months with the full backing of the united states which shouldn't be seen as a um uh which actually should be seen as part of this genocide because it has been enabling it well uh dr. yagid it's it's very interesting for me to see how the negotiation table will look like at the moment because all heard how qatar was saying that i cannot pressure hamas anymore because you killed their leader, egypt saying, "i'm not going to give up that of a border," and now you have new leader of hamas. how do you think the shape of this deal would be, or the negotiating table at least, because sanwar already said that, look, we have set of uh points, you either agree to them, or we're just leaving the negotiations. how do you think that will turn

out eventually? well, it might continues be of course very difficult given these very imbalance. that these uh negotiations are based on, and of course the assassination of haniya has made it clear once again that israelies are not interested in uh finding solution for path towards the cease fire, so it will continue to to be difficult, and at the same time of course the entire conversation about the cease fire in itself should be alarming, because now over 10 months into this genocide there hasn't been any stronger response from the so-called international community, no intervention on behalf of palestinians, no sanctions against the israeli regime, no hal to arms sales, so in the end the ceasefire negotiations in themselves or prospective ceastfire um is also not necessarily an end uh to this genocide, so from this perspective um regardless of the current dynamics of these

talks, it will continue to be very difficult, and of course we need to to keep in mind that hamas had previously agreed to a cease fire which had been rejected by the israeli regime and 11 times in specific they agreed 11 times and israel just reneg exactly because the israeli regime um knows very well it can continue there's no red line and it can continue to kill uh and massacre palestinians while pretending to be interested in a seasfire so the entire conversation within the so-called international community shifting toward the ceasfire is in itself very alarming and just uh allows the israeli regime to continue. well uh there are the implications odaciously if i may that the us wants to impose new sanctions, economic sanctions against iran if it retaliates. this is beyond hypocritical, i believe very honest, and they're doing all of these threats while zinus israel was committing new massacre at the tabin school in the central

uh in center of gaza, taking away the lives of at least 150 civilians. but how do you think that stands from the united states of america might affect the us-iran uh relationship and uh which is obviously not good to begin with, as well as the maybe broader regional landscape. i mean, these threats of sanctions just once again show that the united states doesn't have any other option, and it just adds more sanctions to continuous sanctions that the united states has been issuing against iran as a form of... economic warfare and coersion over the decades, one might even wonder how many more sanctions can there uh be placed at this point, and this is very much part of the us very aggressive foreign policy. uh in this region and of course at the center of the us foreign policy and one could even argue at the center of their political identity is the israeli regime designist entity and its

continuous settler colonial conquest so at the end of course iran which is a leading voice and forest within the resistance continues to post the major uh threat alongside with its allies in the region against israeli regime and so of course it is not surprising that it will continue. to face these sanctions and accusations of terrorism and be labeled um as the enemy, so from this perspective, it is very much expected uh from the united states uh to to continue to exert this pressure, and at the same time of course uh the sanctions themselves are a part of the reason why the resistance throughout the uh region has become so significant and strong uh throughout the decades and we also need to keep in mind that the us um, not only its involvement in western asia, but its global standing a global scale has increasingly uh been uh damaged by the continuous support in

particular by the biden regime uh of this genocide, so i think the power or anyth the say of the us uh is is going to continue to decline in western asia? well, in one minute, the big question, dr. ayage, do you think the region is going towards an all-out war or possibly? the end of the genocide in gaza? it's difficult to predict, but unfortunately the israeli regime has shown that it doesn't have any restraint that knows no red line, so from that perspective, it is clear the israeli regime is going to continue to kill, to provoke and escalate with the assassinations in the last week, being just the latest example of how willing the israeli regime is to risk a broader escalation, the resistance has shown lot of patience and restraint, but at the end of the day uh questions about the region are also answered in washington dc and beyond, so unfortunately it is of course very possible that with the

continuous us zianist aggression that the region might be torn even further into a broader colonial and once again imperialist warfare against the people of the region. well dr. daniel, j political commentator, thank you very much for your analysis uh for the upcoming wave of possible new... violence in the region because of the continuous genocide on gaza by zin is usual aided, ebated and funded by the united states of america and its friends. ladies and gents, thank you very much for watching us right here uh on the midi stream, please do follow us on telegram and on x and we promise to always get you the latest right here from west asia on press tvs the medi stream salam alaikum.

iran, the world holds its breath, when will iran act, what will its allies do, and what... will the israeli state respond with and will the americans join the war, and if the americans join the war, what will russia and china do about that? in other words, dear viewers, are we on the brink of not just a regional war, but world war ii, have it out with gallowe, why don't you?

with each passing hour since the shocking assassination of ismail hany in tehran by israel, global media buzz with predictions of iran's impending retaliation as the drums of war reverberate throughout the region. the stage is already set for dramatic reckoning, but questions linger. when will the curtain rise on this high six showdown and will israel survive the range of tehran?

laadlines of death toll from the usraeli genocide in gaza has surpassed the grim milestone of 40,000. the united nations condemns israel's strikes on schools in gaza as a sign of the regime's blatant disregard for international humanitarian law, and russian and ukrainian troops engage in heavy fighting for second week.