dangerous. demand pushes the limits to catastrophe. is the price. is it possible to prevent such disasters. and the off to must be dealt with quickly defectively. oil spills and thrills. ots available in international her tone for. her to lose the intercontinental one only westlake otoh sure. sedona sweet. tour of. hotels in the middle. of a little in a resort and spa. welcome

back here with our top stories up to thirty people have been injured in a terror attack in southern russia as a car bomb exploded near a cafe in the bustling center of the. investigators believe in the tory is chechen militant with links to al qaida is behind the attack. facing up to the global drug threat the russian president meets the leaders of afghanistan and pakistan to thresh out ways of tackling trafficking experts say a regional approach is vital to combat the fuelling of the afghan heroin which kills tens of thousands of people each year. and a growing number of u.s. nationals are choosing to renounce their citizenship last year alone over seven hundred people gave the american dream three times as many as a year before. they had lived here in our t.n. next ahead of the baits in cross talk with hospital bill and his gas discussing

what's been achieved during the four year long war on drugs. the united states of america is waging war within its own army. till now no advantage is on no one side. and human losses are quite significant. is it possible to win the war against sexual assault in the us armed forces sex in the army on r t. if you. follow me and welcome to cross talk i'm peter lavelle after forty years the so-called war on drugs has achieved preciously little nonetheless governments

around the world continue to pursue remarkably similar policies is it time to completely rethink the entire illegal drugs equation from production to consumption . can you. discuss measures to fight drug pandemics i'm joined by even needleman in new york he's the executive director of the drug policy alliance in edinburgh we go to dr ian all over he's a consultant for the united nations office on drugs and crime and in london we have sebastian seville the executive director of release the u.k. center of expertise on drugs the law and human rights and another member of our crosstalk team on the hunger or a gentleman crosstalk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime to respond to a panel member first of all i'd like to go to ethan in new york after forty years a trillion dollars has been spent and hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost

during what has been called the war on drugs is that war a complete failure or a sliding scale here. well let's call it about a ninety five percent failure you know it may it may be the case that treating a variety of drugs is illegal has reduced the number of people who use it by a modest amount but as with alcohol prohibition the united states is generated extraordinary levels of crime and violence and corruption in the u.s. and all around the world it's responsible for massive incarceration rates the united states and russia and many other places is responsible for many overdose they tally is responsible in significant ways for the spread of hiv aids around the world among people who use drugs and among the people who come into contact with them it has as you pointed out peter cost over a trillion dollars there may be more casualties in this war on drugs the united states than any war in our history except possibly the civil war so there's no question that we need to head in

a new direction and fortunately there is evidence that that's beginning to happen well if and it's and if i could stay with you then but a lot of people are very critical of the obama administration's policy on the war on drugs even they don't like to use that term anymore there's a lot of disappointment is that a valid thing to say. it's partially fair and partially not i testified before congress last month and when i pointed out was that on the one hand the obama administration is pointing in a new direction on drug policy different from the prior bush administrations the clinton administration nixon administration what have you they have they are for example speaking about drug problems as health issues rather than criminal issues they are pushing to reduce the very harsh mandatory minimum sentences which have had an extraordinarily disproportionate impact on african-americans in america they did finally support federal funding for needle exchange they have allowed the states that have legalized medical marijuana greater freedom to implement those policies so in all those respects the obama administration is

a breath of fresh air on drug policy but on the other hand if you look at the federal drug war budget the same two to one ratio in favor of throwing money down the drain on enforcement and interdiction remains in place you don't see the increase until rehabilitation right they are resistant to speaking the language of harm reduction so there's a real mix story right now ok sebastian if i can go to you are you satisfied with them first of all why did why is it such a catastrophe ok ethan said ninety five percent ok i mean wow after a trillion dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives and we're still doing more or less the same thing maybe slightly different but i mean why was it such a catastrophe. well i would i would agree with probably everything. props. up to about ninety eight percent i mean prohibition has really been a complete abdication of responsibility by governments politicians to regulate substances like they do with everything else in the world. their response to drugs

and outlaw all three plants. and the outcomes of that weren't so tragic it would probably be funny i mean ethan alluded to some of the outcomes but when you think of the rich while it's that's going on the rivers of money which a flurry into gangsters coffers align them to do stabilise countries i mean it's it's really ridiculous and the time has come to take a fresh look at this and politicians know this but they're very frightened to speak out about it because for so long they've been in the same drum about how they're going to stamp out drugs and that's not possible well you know if i can go to you i mean we have a sitting president of the united states and a sitting prime minister in britain that have admitted to using illegal drugs i mean is it really time to really completely rethink this i mean there's difference of opinions and to what degree you decriminalize some of these drugs ok and it can be a big argument about that but is it finally on the agenda where we have to start talking

about that and very openly and not being it's it's almost as if it's taboo still. well there's one or two things that ethan said that obviously are patiently true in fact he missed out on the saying that much of the international terrorism international organized crime is funded by drugs money and you've got so many interrelated problems that it's difficult to separate out the criminality of drugs from the problem of drug abuse given that what i would also say is that over the last hundred years we've had drug control if you went back to the early twentieth one thousand nine hundred century the problems of drug abuse illicit drug abuse then or even drugs that were illicit at that time were enormous and so to say the i don't like the term war on drugs and i concede without doubt that many countries failed to implement an adequate policy and the reason for that very often in the

case of america in south america they talk about we had the plan colombia we had the counter-narcotics efforts in colombia but mixed up with all of that is the reality is that what america is concerned with addressing is the counterinsurgency because they're now dependent on south america for oil so you can not throw out little bit statements and say everything's failed because it hasn't the international conventions have provided all thoughts of ways of providing for treatment and rehabilitation which very often have been ignored and i agree that we don't want to turn every drug user interest criminal but neither do we want to go down the road of legalization because apart from anything else that's demonstrably impossible no government in the world could legalize drugs and control a defectively because the end result of all of that would be a much worse health problem than we've got at the moment sebastian do you think that's true i mean you do what do you really do we do you like it. or bashing

a little first of all good effect on our heads i should i'll just point to as we're often happens is people do take the position is that they describe drug uses two things either either as criminals or people who need treatment now the vast majority of the router drugs of course. besides the drugs are not criminals and most of them don't need treatment recreational drug users so i think we go look at that as well one third of the population of this country has taken illegal drugs in their lifetime so it's not some believe you i'm sorry to interrupt sebastian but the problem with all of these things is that this testicle information about illicit subjects is enormously difficult to get hold of the best we can say is that the information that we're talking about is informed guestimate but you can't you can't throw out a statement like that the majority of people that use drugs have no effect and it's

recreational look at the abuse of cocaine look at the abuse of cannabis for many people there's mental and heart problems you don't know how many people who die from heart attacks a cocaine you hear when you. know just a minute let me finish if you look at admissions to london hospitals on a saturday night friday saturday night the forty year olds many of them with heart conditions have actually been using cocaine and you cannot just say well this is all right because people here is here a clear story or even you want to jump in there go ahead. i just want to point to three mistakes that he and it's made the first is that he refers to a global drug control system that has evolved over the last century there's elements of truth to that in dealing with pharmaceutical drugs but with respect to the three drugs from plant products to sebastian put it the the coke a cocaine the opium heroin the marijuana in fact we haven't had a control system we've had a global prohibition regime people sometimes make the mistake of assuming that

prohibition represents the ultimate form of regulation i think in makes that mistake when in fact prohibition represents the abdication of regulation in fact when you have a prohibition system anything you don't control effectively is controlled by the criminals the second mistake he makes is to say that change will never happen reminds me of a senator more a shepherd in one nine hundred thirty one was asked if alcohol prohibition would ever come to an end and he said i think the chances of alcohol prohibition ending in america are about the same as a hummingbird carrying the empire state building on its back to the moon and two years later a national memo was repealing alcohol prohibition and i think the same is very much true certainly with respect to the probation of marijuana and thirdly it makes the third mistake yes the statistics are unreliable but would you look at the hundreds of millions of people who use marijuana to argue with sebastian when he says the vast majority of those have been recreational users is simply flat out false the same is true with respect to cocaine there is abundant epidemiological evidence

from all around the world that the vast majority of people who use cocaine or other stimulants were not addicted were recreational users so it's got three core mistakes in the argument he's making and quite frankly when you look in my country we're now will have a marijuana legalization initiative on the ballot in california this november where you look at the growing movement towards the decriminalization or at least legal regulation of cannabis in many countries i think we're definitely headed a new direction in the twenty first century and you want to reply to some of those comments yes i do because i'm putting arguments that i have made a merely pointing out the fact. that it's not possible to generalise in the way that this conversation is going to go i think that the conventions the international conventions do make treatment and and rehabilitation and help for those that need it high priority and the problem historically has been and we all know in many many mistakes has been turning far too many people into criminals and depending too much on law enforcement to deal with

a major problem that problem has gone so far. that it's idle to pretend that drugs don't have an impact on the society at large and there are all right even or for them to have it just point one after a short break we'll continue our discussion on drug trafficking and other problems stay with us. and you can. still. keep. the total team has been to the kaluga region where the qantas tree is rapidly developing an economic argy goes to the area where the first russian fleet was more to where the indigenous people were the first arctic sees

navigator and where russia's glorious history is still visible. welcome to the priests. should look sharp. extracting black gold dangerous. the worldwide demand pushes the limits to catastrophe. is the price too high. is it possible to prevent such disasters. and can the aftermath be dealt with quickly and effectively. oil

spills and thrills on r.t. . odds of getting. to. the big. one the be welcome back to cross talk i'm peter about the tree mind you were discussing whether countries around the world are doing enough to fight drug addiction. the beginning. before let's see what russians think about this. the scorch of the modern world illegal drugs this problem is as destructive as it's pervasive with governments all over the world grappling to find solutions and recent public opinion research center survey gauge the russians attitude towards drug addiction thirty seven

percent saw drug addiction as a symptom of wider social problems twenty nine percent view drug addiction as a disease which they believe should be treated in hospitals some say drug addicts represent a threat to social order and should be isolated from the rest of society and then that the six percent take a libertarian view believing drug abuse and its consequences is a matter of personal choice the russian government has a clear view of the problem president dmitry medvedev sees drugs as a threat to russia's national security and has committed huge resources to combating drug trafficking and addiction. ok before we went to the break we were talking about elements of criminalization of some drugs you want to continue your thought before the thought you were hearing before you into the break no out just continue briefly with that because of course there are massive problems associated with the with drugs regardless of where they're legal or illegal and the first one

is it's already been alluded to is major public health problems globally aids hiv hepatitis c. all blood borne diseases are exacerbated by needle used in sharing of needles and this kind of thing many of the prisons around the world are nothing but incubated for these diseases second one we've referred to is is international organized crime and the majority of domestic crime in most countries is probably in one way or another drug related you've got money laundering which has a major impact on finance it isn't just the american subprime mortgage problem it is money laundering and the flight of capital around the world and then you've got the issue of too. there is imminent threat to oil and gas supplies in central asia i could go on but we implicit in what ethan is saying anything title to his view is that drugs should be legalized and people should be able to get on with it and make their own choices my argument is that if you do that you will end up with a greater public health problem you will still have criminal that will undercut

legalisation and taxation and all of that and you will not alleviate the problem at all and so wealthy thins free to say what he wants and so is sebastian and have their opinions surely what they should be saying is let's have another look at it and let's do this and i for one would be the first person to say that i think it's time for a new u.n. convention obviously countries aren't complying ok sebastian what if there were this decriminalization and legalization of some if not all these drugs would create a greater public health risk than we have now. i don't think there's any evidence to support that i mean the simple analogy is to look at that kind of misuse in holland where it's at all intents and purposes available through the regulated bodies and kind of its use amongst young people in holland is lower than amongst young people in the u.k. but i want to disco on to talk about something else about about really following

through with strong prohibition policies i mean even if we could catch say the thirty forty biggest kingpins in the world to people to margin for one moment the drugs would cease to exist and the places would be immediately taken by less experienced younger potentially more violent people because the amounts of money the reward this work so enormous and so significant that people are always going to be replaced and the idea that somehow i'm measuring use of drugs is an indicator is this really not very useful sort of of the pond i mean the harm the drugs cause is a much useful indicator i mean take if you had say in the u.k. if you had five million people who smokes a little bit of cannabis a line occur every three months would that be as bad as having five hundred thousand people who smoke crack every day clearly not ok ethan what do you think

about that. well i mean i have to say and i appreciate even saying we're entitled to our own opinions but we're not entitled to our own facts and many of the arguments he's making are remarkably similar to the arguments that were made against repealing alcohol prohibition the united states in the early one nine hundred thirty s. the claim that the criminals are just undersell the market sold cheaper booze and this sort of thing in point of fact if you have a sensible public health policy which taxes some of these drugs taxes these drugs keeps the price high enough to discourage consumption but low enough to rent a black market from coming in that moralist deals with that issue i mean some years ago the united nations office on drugs and crime to consult an estimate of the global value of the black market in drugs and roughly four hundred billion dollars a year or seventy eight percent of global trade that's a massive thing remember it's not drugs that are filling our prisons drugs that are empowering terrorists and creating crime and corruption violence it's not drugs pre-sale that's doing that it's drug prohibition it's a failed prohibitionist policy so we have

a choice when it comes to drugs we can continue with the failed policies of the past we can continue with the militarization of criminalization policy that empowers criminals all around the world from afghanistan to jamaica from russia to the united states that generates vast black markets and that is singularly unsuccessful in reducing drug abuse or we can move in the direction of allowing these drugs to be taxed controlled and regulated in a responsible way as we're trying to do with other substances ok subash and i both agree they give it the incredibly evident failures of past policies we do need to head in this direction ok why can't some of the things that ethan is been saying be incorporated in that because i think everyone agrees these drugs are not going to go away no matter what we do they're always going to be out there and someone is always going to try to make money off it under current conditions i mean i'm just trying to imagine even the reason we had some sort of magic power that you could click your fingers to my cease to exist. would the world be

a better place still be a great demand for stimulus and possibly we would move to something worse like methamphetamine so i think this idea of getting rid of substances is really not the way to go it's how to effectively regulation control it like we do with everything else ok a thing i mean one of the things you were saying earlier i think is really interesting is that there are different numbers about how large the illicit drug trade in the world is but it's remarked the number of the you use the i came across a slightly smaller one but that's almost exactly the amount of money that is being used to fight this so-called war on drugs i mean it's remarkable that the value of it and the cost of of trying to confront it is almost equal again i mean there must be a different way of approaching this because you know it's employing cynical on the other side it's really funds these huge judicial systems and police systems and all of this here i mean it's almost an industry on both sides they both thrive on each other. well peter i think you put it exactly right that if you look at who's really

benefiting from the current global war on drugs is prohibition the system it's really two elements one is on the one hand it's the traffickers it's the politicians who make money from this it's all the people benefiting from the illegality of the drugs combined with the market and on the other hand it's these prison industrial complex is these law enforcement complexes it's people getting more and more jobs and money both as part of their legal salaries or through corruption who are also profiting and you would you seen of the last thirty or forty years is that each of these two groups the traffickers on the one hand the enforcements on the other keep getting bigger and bigger and wealthier and more powerful and the victims are essentially all the rest of us they're all the rest of us who use drugs all the rest of us who don't use drugs none of whom are really getting much benefit at all from the current system so i want to say we're speaking here as an advocate for different policies i'm speaking here as a former professor who's an analyst but i'm also speaking here is a parent and when you look at this policy which you realize is that the current

policies are doing nothing to protect our children if anything the people have the greatest access to illegal drugs in my country most others are young people so the whole notion that we need to continue with this failed prohibition this policy in order to protect the kids that's the ultimate liable all subash and if i can go to you is it institutionally driven i mean is this is this the inertia that we're facing is that everyone says it's really really bad but there's a lot of people that are. producers i mean you have the police on one side of the border buying what guns and then you have illegally illegally people buying guns on the other side of the border and it's just good business i mean it just keeps going on and on it's amazingly cynical. yes that is i think i agree with what you think about and also there's been so many myths perpetuated the drug user over the last forty years but somehow to talk a new language

a new ways of doing things can seem sort of counter-intuitive to people they've been sort of misled by politicians for so long so the only way to deal with this is to stamp it out to suggest anything else makes you sound somehow like you're encouraging drug use and not something else which is perpetuated by by the by the drug war is that people like us who want to see change somehow pro-drug years of course we're not in fact probably one tighter control on drugs on the prohibition of screws. right now there's absolutely no control on drugs whatsoever ok even if i go to you i mean one of the things is that all of this the prison populations in the united states and the u.k. this is a by changing this approach to drugs we could see quite a few of the prison cells emptied. but i think that's exactly right i mean united states we've gone from a half a million people behind bars in one nine hundred eighty to two point three million

people today in bars and the number one thing driving that is the war on drugs united states we have less than five percent of the world's population but almost twenty five percent of the world's incarcerated population i should point out is not just in the u.k. but second only to the united states when it comes to incarcerating its fellow citizens is russia russia is second to the united states where it comes to rates of incarceration it's also filling its prisons with nonviolent drug offenders who are put in contact with much worse criminals and in a way the attitudes in russia are almost like the attitudes were in the u.s. a decade ago still pursuing the same old failed policies without thinking clearly and gentlemen when it is we've all run out of time here many thanks to our guests in oliver ethan nadelmann and sebastian seville and thanks to our viewers for watching us here darkie see you next time and remember cross talk rules. if. you could if you.

signed up to fill in the military because i thought that it was my duty not that it was something that i could do to help my country. my government i thought that it was necessary for americans to feel known there was a lot of drug abuse there was a lot of murder of american officers by american soldiers there were a lot of moves. to go out and buy. before the war i always thought i wanted to win a lot of medals and to have a lot of desperation. but afterwards i realize that they they don't mean anything they're not that important. i don't i don't i never kept the medal.