increase rapidly in this summer heat wave also want to use a urging people to use insect repellent to come about as much as possible. they found the time of the recent u.s. russia sponsor on the chop and is exposed again based on a sexy photo shoot for a glossy magazine on its first public appearance since the people take home the united states in a major sky sports but the magazine is now suing the child and for breach of contract on the ship posted on the rise pictures on the web. discrimination on the basis of cost is a negative media but in calls of the country it remains the main plot set when choosing a line on this point this is growing number of couples in the country are facing rejection behind is that communities as they turn their back on british some households even while kidnapping charges to provide that children breaking with historic obama. it's time for aussies debate crosstalk and little about his guests

discuss what that reality shows give t.v. a bad name all if they possess some social value that's coming your way in just a moment. take. a low and welcome in rostock time peter lavelle reality t.v. wonderfully popular in commercially lucrative but just how realistic are these programs are they the ultimate form of spontaneous expression or are they merely evidence of how modern values are centered on the most banal common denominators. you can. discuss modern t.v. i'm joined by stephen reese and columbus he's the executive director of the world

society of motivation scientists and professionals in glasgow we go to brian mcknight our he's a professor of journalism and communication at the university of strathclyde and we go to london to study molly she's a lecturer of media and communications a bernal university and another member of our cross talk team yell on the hunger all right folks cross talk rules in effect but first i'd like to make a few comments about some of the research i did making this program because i am i do not actually watch reality t.v. programs quote this is what i found some my research reality t.v. makes us feel dirty and cheap and if we didn't we probably wouldn't bother turning turn tuning into it never have so many watch t.v. with so little good to say about it and also critics call it gutter t.v. and humiliation t.v. reflects a culture that worships vanity and wealth rather than virtue and humility so if i go to you brian why do people watch reality t.v. programs. i think that reality t.v.

gives people in and say into us as banal as ordinary and what it doesn't shed a light on the ordinary and it makes the ordinary so more extraordinary we all live ordinary waifs. we really get an opportunity on mainstream t.v. to watch interpersonal dynamics personalities developing all of it done in a relatively spontaneous manner and i think it is genuinely fascinating you know we are human beings we're interested in other human beings this kind of form of t.v. always has access to one dimension of human experience that we rarely actually experience it was of our own families of course and it was of our own friendships so this isn't a place of your but it is of lawyers and i think is quite healthy in quite a reflection in nature ok stephen you think it's healthy being a voyeur. i don't know how much boy or. is involved in reality t.v. i have a little bit of a different take on it go right ahead in the research there in the research that we

did the number one reason the most important motive for watching reality t.v. is that it reflected the values of a person concerned with status and other words it was about fame and fortune and so i think the audience can see ordinary people getting attention attention is a primal indicator of respect and importance and they can imagine themselves doing that and they sort of having their lives and the things that they see in their life being validated as important and the values the of the audience are the values of wealth and fame or what i call a high status person they're not the values of intellectuals they're not the values of people who want to learn about anything they're the values of people who want to

be rich and famous yeah but stephen vanstone with you is be humiliating yourself in front of millions of people is that a value. is that something that we should think is a social positive good well i don't know if they. were to do is two different things here there's the audience and then there's the people who are going on t.v. i'm not sure that the people who are actually on t.v. . think of themselves as being humiliated they getting famous they getting attention and even negative attention is better than being ignored it it's a very primal thing you pay attention to things or people who are important you ignore everybody else most of the audience is ignored the people on a television program they are getting attention they getting fame and they're being paid they know probably don't see it is you really a ok city how about you or is it all of these programs truly reflect the values of

society because i guess maybe i am a snob i would like to think society has higher values than a lot of these programs not all of them but some of these programs that have come out that are still very very very popular. they are very popular i think it's very easy to make these kind of sweeping generalization about reality t.v. being representing some kind of moral decline and the audience is sort of mindlessly kind of consuming what's put out by reality television and i think actually the story's a lot more complex than that of course there is a sort of sort of huge plot of reality television today and audiences clearly find a lot of pleasure in it there's this whole idea of the pleasure principle of audiences actually forgetting the pain in life the difficulties of the every day and actually enjoying watching reality television for the pleasures that it brings in as different motivations for people being fascinated with reality television but there's also something else which kind of accounts for the popularity of reality

television and that's a financial factor which doesn't mean mentioned here and that's obviously institutional issue which is about why actually reality television is so successful today and that's to do with the market the media market single formats being able to be cloned globally and you know production companies be able to actually really get some sort of high revenue low cost material which the public seems to be very much in favor of and go back to you brian i mean. if we if we program to repeat the question. do they reflect the value of society or a large proportion of society they are fabulously popular. yes and i we do they are popular because they clearly appeal. to human interest you know they're often it's often dismissed as it's just human interest media it's just human

interest journalism but actually of course human beings are interested in themselves and in the societies and in their and their groups and as i said before reality t.v. at least as it started off with big brother and so on ten years ago was an opportunity presented an opportunity for people to kind of be flies on the wall of groups of individuals or relationships watching them develop in change i don't think it was wealth and fame to be honest nearly in the early days of of big brother and other reality formats that mediate that may have may of developed i mean as all successful formats on t.v. do becomes becomes more complicated more contrived more game show focused that happens certainly to big brother and great britain and in other countries are you saying i see a sign of these are very expensive you know are you saying you know you could go ahead you know if there's been an evolution here and i could touch upon that go ahead steven. finish your point i just want to see it and it's basically just point

about expensive it's true that it's true that it can be cheap t.v. and that's why it's popular with with with production companies that doesn't explain its popularity with audiences though and it's also the case that programs like big brother are actually quite expensive to make the not as cheap as sometimes is regarded as thought that saves in that art plenty of cheap imitations much much cheaper versions of some of these big shoes but the idea that all reality t.v. is just cheap t.v. that is produced mass marketed across the world is slightly i think. too simplistic is it can be very expensive i think and very very same place to me to make her jump in go ahead if i if i can just build on my point really which is that it's obviously reality t.v. has been. the way in which global formats have kind of thrived and flourished and certainly i wouldn't say that all reality television is cheap t.v. if anything actually i'm kind of quite adverse to speaking about reality television

if it's one thing we know that actually encompasses many different kinds of programming you know from docu soap to talent shows to surveillance shows such as big brother to talk shows so it's certainly not one thing we shouldn't talk about in blanket terms at all. and i think there is an important connection there between the public society and reality television as is shown or it goes way back sort of before big brother many decades before when you know we had to tell even television could have been said to start with sort of candid camera back in the forty's there's always been this kind of connection there between the social and. self in fact the early kind of notions of reality television were very much about the production of social knowledge and if we think about social documentaries the fifty's and sixty's and i think there's still that kind of connection today so i certainly wouldn't be the first person to say that actually you know it's cheap or lazy programming and i'm. generally very supportive of reality television even

though i do think it does throw up a set of critical concerns which i think i think we're all aware of make we can talk a bit more about ok stephen if i go to you i mean i think we've all we've all touched upon one issue here in common in the evolution here we've seen an evolution of this type of programming because it makes me question i mean how much of it really is reality t.v. now because it's more and more scripted more and more controlled more and more outrageous for some people's tastes i mean we went from something that. made a connection to people and now it's charged to really go find. the you know the consciousness or whatever i mean are you concerned about how that's been changed over the five years. well i mean the whole culture keeps changing and it's it's hard to keep up with it sometimes you know things that were considered maybe inappropriate thirty forty years ago you

know they just keep pushing the limits and pushing no limits in terms of culture. i think that comment a little bit about the money part of it go and i don't really know them much about the business about the business but the fact that it may be inexpensive something it is isn't going to attract anyone to watching it no one wants to watch a show cares about what what this show actually cause and what we study and we've studied probably forty fifty thousand people now including a fair number in europe and including russians we study values and the values we know how values go together so for example what i call a high status person the values that go under that are attention wanting to get attention ok so you can i'm going to jump in here real quick after

a short break we'll continue our discussion on reality t.v. shows stay with our team.

just. tragedy. these still feel the fear they. will remain in their memories and hearts. wealthy british.

market. find out what's really happening to the global economy with. no holds barred the global financial headlines kaiser reports.

welcome back to crossfire i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're talking about what stands behind the popularity of reality t.v. programs. but before let's see what russians think about them so this reality shows first appeared on t.v. screens they have sparked a lot of debate and the issue of censorship is high on the agenda the russian public opinion research center conducted a survey and ask citizens what should be censored on the t.v. fifty seven percent said it was necessary to ban sex fifteen percent wanted censorship of reality t.v. programs and the same percentage of people call for a filter on the use of bad language and the five percent say they want to see the coverage of tragedies and terrorist attacks censored however eight percent believe

there should be no censorship at all on the russian t.v. back to peta ok stephen i'd like to go back to you on that beef because i want to talk more about values and that's what you were talking about again another comment i'd like to read about what i came across in preparing for this program a car a community of more materialistic morons who don't think blink twice about running around naked while swallowing live cockroaches if it means being cool and winning a million dollars to do so again i go back to the values because i've always believed and i like how documentaries educated people made people aware of things about how people live and maybe i'm old fashioned in that respect but stephen you were talking about values i mean is it a value to do that kind of thing just for money is that a reflection of our society today. well it's a reflection of the values of some people in this society you're also expressing

different values you're you're basically expressing a negative view towards those values by saying you know why isn't society have a higher values notice also yes you said you don't watch reality t.v. so it's perfectly consistent and you're an example of what i'm saying that the people watching have the other values the the one thing about values to make two quick points a common opposites so there are some people who value wealth and fame and there is some people who don't and people who are on the two ends of the pole motivated to trash each other you can't understand someone who has an opposite value to you so if you're one who likes the shows because they project wealth and fame and you're someone who and someone else doesn't value wealth and fame they're going to tranship the person who doesn't value wealth and fame they're going to say that's low values what's wrong with you for wanting to do that that's true not only

in regard to reality t.v. in the values in al explaining why people are criticizing it you're basically saying intellectual values are better than status values and that's for you that's how that works out for you but i can assure you there are millions of people who are the other way around oh i can see signs of life family wealth and in time i value wealth and fame but you know i don't go on reality t.v. shows i do it to television shows where you know i come in there and. you make. a study to said there are many different kinds of reality t.v. show in the one nine hundred ninety s. we had to join a new one as docu source in the country in britain. to be done a lot of research on the motivations of those who participated in those programs and they often say things like i want to share my experience of you know difficulty or tragedy with others. as i want to develop myself personally and so forth and many of those programs were very educational and intentionally hard what's really

to call their social knowledge function so we learn about people who worked on cruise ships or in airlines or we learned about driving instructors and how they function a bit brighter and you know he's on point very clearly a quick question i mean where we were when strangers never was money at all was money the agenda and i guess you just answered it was money at the center of all of it because a great deal of it today is go ahead it wasn't it wasn't that and in many of the current programs i would say it's no at the center but you're right to say that. john has evolved to the former has evolved in the last decade the very success of big brother and other formats in attracting media coverage from from the tabloid press in particular has meant it that emerges as a vehicle if you want to be famous very quickly and you don't have much talent then one may do is to go onto reality t.v. that is true and that has happened. and as a result of some of those four months i think have lost their educational function

and how become a boat wealth and theme and what people are prepared to do in order to achieve it and it becomes a game show and the audiences enjoy as a game show it's like pop idol x factor reality reality sure how t.v. has morphed into a. kind of game sure type of sorts of liberty culture in which ordinary people are you know and celebrities are a way to participate and possibly become celebrities well once famous for thirty million just really to rag on head right to jump right in there go ahead. i think it's really interesting what brian's saying and i think one of the things that we do academics we're trying to do is read try and sort of historic reality t.v. look at the ways it's changed in the last decade and it's definitely been tonal shifts one might argue that actually now sort of post in the u.k. the celebrity big brother race around there's been a shift in some of the sort of manifestations of some of the talent shows and some

of the kind of cruelty has actually changed and we've seen a kind of more gentle approach towards the public so the ways in which reality television itself is changing the nuances is really the way we should be approaching it rather than talking about a decline in valleys per se and i would also want to say it's an area that i'm interested in researching is actually some of the social good that potentially has come out of reality television and i'm thinking specifically about the way in which reality television more than any other shown on television has actually platform the range of social types and in many ways can be seen as being responsible for showing a kind of more modern conception of the world that we see different people in terms of ethnicity in terms of sexuality ability intellect you know social background and actually i would say that we are to television is doing a lot more in that sense then some of the other sean or even those there are claim to kind of work in the public interest so if i get you i do use it it's breaking

down certain stereotypes you might have about. gender or ethnicity about sexual orientation and things like that i mean if you mean example what you mean by that we're in example where these reality programs can actually help what i would argue this is a progressive agenda. yes i mean i think you know if you look at the big brother in the u.k. which has just just been launched launched last week you know you've got such a huge range of people in there and there's very little space elsewhere on television where you get that diversity so i think there are there are sort of really important developments in the area that's not to say that reality t.v. has the power to eliminate all stereotypes because because of course in many ways it's quite a conservative schoener in many ways it does hold certain definitions of what citizens are and those who belong and those who do not but i think what's important

to look at just not what we are t.v. kind of doing to society but also how society is reflected in reality television and so i think it's a two way process and there is a dialogue going on stephen what do you think about. the street there a dialogue going on between the two. skeptical about. i think everybody has the same values every you know the same the same things we care about but we care about them differently we prioritize the same things differently so everybody is going to say oh i like wealth and fame or i would like to be rich or gay or almost everybody will but we all work we asked people stream questions searchers wealth was the most important thing to me so we can we can differentiate how motivated by money how motivated you are and you yourself may not know the answer to that these things don't change very much what would people

who like attention and what people who like money do is they select the programs that agree with with their values now intellectuals do not watch reality t.v. people watching reality t.v. like attend. and that's why these shows are going to get more and more extreme because if you look at something you paying attention to it after a while you get bored with it so they have to get more extreme or outrageous to attract you ok so i'm skeptical about people learning think a bright ality if i go to brian it sounds like stephen is saying that we're just going to go down the line of spreading circuses ok more and more extreme. i'm afraid i think stephen is all over simplifying was a very complex set of t.v. genres. sure that are people who are interested in meat and wealth and fame and

that is their motivation to go on but there are also people who wish to test themselves who wish to push the boundaries a little but who wish to educate the british surely american of the great russian public you know there are many motivations good motivations for appearing on reality t.v. and audiences i think is i think it's wrong to say that they're not intellectual i think they're sort of slightly dangerous. i mean i would regard myself i'm not snobbish at all as an intellectual but i mean i've enjoyed reality t.v. through across the last decade i've learned a lot from i believe enjoyed watching real people and kind of slightly yes it's not it's not it's not an unmediated reality by any means but it's a form of spontaneous social observation made possible by the internet made possible by digital technologies and cameras that we simply didn't have access to back in the ninety's or the teaser even before ok when we were almost running. was running out so we don't like to give you the last word where are we going with

reality t.v. and about forty seconds well well i think now we can just talk about reality television let's talk about reality culture look at you chibi is reality without the t.v. . and people are voluntarily are asking to be watched through to twitter through you know through facebook or other social networking sites so really we're talking about a new kind of public which producer and that's something to be applauded in terms of access. ok well thank you guy i wanted i could a had you know what i mean and seconds go ahead their heads now you say we look at every motor every one curiosity has no correlation with watching reality t.v. none whatsoever just as many people intellectuals watch as you know. it's not watch all right people values dad is overwhelmingly white ok i want to thank my guests a day in london a glasgow and columbus and thanks to you our viewers for watching us here at r.g.p.

see you next time and remember cross talk rules. and you can. still.

her. mother. in law. the one on. the street still keeps its secrets but now it's time to feel that the soviet silence mickey johnson's job between black and white and obsolete. hungry for the full story we've got it first hand the biggest issues get a human voice face to face with the news makers. the headlines from all stay at home are there like west nile virus a southern russia at a fixed people have done with it it's a hundred back to the tropical viruses spread by mosquitoes this population.