russia close up on. russia to help. from viewers of war once western forces withdraw from the troubled country meeting with that its promise comes during president called lon nol visit to moscow roots a pledge to clamp down on the vols flow of drugs. a russian born woman crowned norwegian over the year faces being booted out of the country norwegians are angry in reality means being deported while the law un wants a terrorist to stay. on russian business for every bit of it is set for a new pretrial hearing on charges of smuggling weapons but the alleged almost dida

says a growing media hate campaign is convicted him before he's had a chance to step inside. up next be developed his cross to gas argue whether that is in crisis or cools the sand to shift across the middle east when it comes to democracy. and you can. still. follow and welcome the cross talk guy people about shifting sands in the greater middle east events in tunisia have inspired similar demonstrations elsewhere in the region often at the risk of violent crackdowns is there now hope for more homegrown

democracy in the arab world. and you can. discuss democracy in the greater middle east i'm joined by stephen zooms in san jose he's a professor of politics and international studies at the university of san francisco in london we have the below ramdani she is a journalist an academic who specializes in the middle east and north africa and in philadelphia we go to daniel pipes he is an author and director of the middle east forum and another member of our cross talk team in the hunger all right cross talk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want i to go to you stephen first events are still unfolding in tunisia and there is the possibility of violence is always there as they go through whatever transition they're going through right now what do you looking at these events here and demonstrations and other partner countries in the region is there a glimmer of hope now that more homegrown democracy can be is part of can be

possible in this region because it's quite you stronger narry what has happened in tunisia. there certainly is hope. both in terms of consolidating democracy in tunisia other that's far from complete and perhaps inspiring a similar approach to the uprisings elsewhere in the arab world not imminently but . over the next few years i think what we've seen you seen in tunisia is what we've seen in places ranging from philippines to serbia from chill eighty crane from from now dives to mali that is you know people who recognize that democracy doesn't come from foreign intervention doesn't come from sanctimonious statements from western capitals or from the people themselves very interesting if i go to you know bill in london here you know you all often hear in common discourse that democracy does

system work in the arab world because they're not ready for democracy and and if democracy is going to be there it has to be guided by others ok i mean we've seen these stereotypes types being broken now because the people of tunisia with very relatively little violence on the side of the people shown that they can get rid of a very vicious dictator a dictator that was praised in the american white house when he when ben ali visited the united states so you know what kind of message are we seeing now would be a different discourse now about what can happen in the arab world. well it's a very important message that we're getting from tunisia and the situation there is demonstrating that it's very much the street which is calling the shots now you know thousands of demonstrators clearly are asking for the old faces of the old regime to resign and they are determined to bring about political reform and indeed democratic change to the country but it has to be emphasized that the situation in

tunisia is still very volatile and what the situation is telling us is that any sudden regime change. rarely is followed by stability and that is in any country and tunisia in that respect is no exception if so we have to keep an eye on on the situation very closely because yes the corrupt president and his family have gone. lately the latest news is that eight cabinet ministers india interim government have quit the former. constitutional democratic party bentleys party but they are still holding on to their munisteri old jobs and that is unacceptable for the tunisian people find out if you mean we could switch the the equation here do you see that the other dictators in the greater middle east i mean are they going to be obviously going to be afraid of what's happening in tunisia because it could happen to them do you

think they're going to tighten their grip even more or using the security forces in one thousand cracking down any kind of dissent because you can change things we like we have i think we all agree is that we don't know what the outcome is it for tunisia but there are certainly change going on so the dictators crack down even more when they start thinking twice about what they're doing. excellent question peter before getting to it let me make a couple of points first the extraordinary thing about what happened to nisha is that it was not ideologically driven the key event was a young man with a college education who kept on getting busted for selling fruit and vegetables because he didn't have a permit and couldn't get a permit and he was abused each time he tried to get a permit it from there on it was not ideological it was about corruption it was about free enterprise it was about freedom of expression but it wasn't driven by islamists it wasn't oh my communists was driven by and him pearl ism or any of these other for a grander scheme she was against

a lousy regime that was stealing and and so forth which is remarkable in the very few such instances and very encouraging and secondly what so far in the days of past we have not seen any ideology come in and swoop in and take over maybe that's yet to happen but it hasn't so far the the third point would be that it's not the regime that fell it's the ruling family the president and his wife and her extended family and preciousness of this group but the regime still stands now again it might fall but at this point you know the structure is there the army the police the politicians are still there so it's a limited it's a limited it's quite a ton more than than a revolution at this point so looking looking beyond tunisia to the other states i think there's some deep soul searching taking place first of all in north africa the literal of the mediterranean morocco algeria libya egypt all four of those have presidents for life as the tunisian or roughly the same not terribly ideological

this point yes mama gadhafi carries on about one thing in another but life in libya is not quite so strange as it used to be and the other countries not optically strangest repressive regimes what are they going to do i can't predict but i think i have a lot to do with each individual circumstance somewhat ease up others will too will will close down it will be fascinating to watch and i think we could go one by want to make a. addictions but as a whole i don't think we can reproduce very stephen let's do you think you know when we ask the question you think these that despots will tighten up and and crack down even more but what about the united states i mean the united states really just got red in the face here i mean he ben ali was treated as a great ally against terror and invited to the white house and what not i mean if you think these dictators are going to say wooed they did they didn't go in and save ben ali did they will will they say for me and i think that you know do you think these dictators now are going to have a look twice at how what kind of support that they can count on from the united states because of those look like there's not much right now. well done much the

united states could do not much any outside power could do and you have a general strike shutting down the country when people were fusing to a baker a few orders when the entire legitimacy of the state was being defied by the masses i mean it's interesting to see how u.s. policy shifted just three days before the fall of the regime hillary clinton was praising the u.s. cities in relationship saying oh we're not taking sides you know we're. we're not interview and i are fearing one way or the other in fact you know just a couple weeks before that when the uprising began and congress voted for an additional twelve million dollars in security assistance for the regime but then on friday you have president obama making these very very positive statements supporting the pro-democracy forces and criticizing the regimes or oppression and i think this is indicative of something that despite the fatalism here in the arab

world about what washington decides controls what's happening on the arab streets we see the arab streets essentially you know controlling what happens to washington's policies and the bill and you know it's very interesting i mean we had hillary clinton come immediately out after these events started unfolding and and really had this kind of bombastic speech about how we need to have democracy in the middle east when one of her allies was you know it deposed i mean i mean explain to me how maybe north african see that i mean you have a country and a secretary save a conversation we need to support freedom and democracy and at the same time you know we still see you know we look at you name the country egypt isn't easy when it comes to mind i mean where you know it all the artists utter rhetoric that doesn't make any sense because the united states is defending the its strategic interests with a leader it can count on that with the egyptian people for example. well absolutely i mean hillary clinton's statement illustrates absolutely and evidently the

hypocrisy of american foreign policy especially in what they call the greater middle east well let's remind our listeners or viewers that the grow to middle east is an expression which was coined by the bush administration to refer to a wide spectrum of countries ranging from pakistan in the to morocco in the west they bear no relation to each other and it just shows that america is looking at this part of the world the most and the broader muslim world in the turbo versity as a monolithic block it doesn't want to take into account the differing differences in the social economic political and indeed cultural. variations of the region and it's looking at this part of the world purely in security terms and in militaristic terms. i mean the u.s. administration has supported corrupt regimes like the egyptian government and

indeed tunisia and other such countries in the region and it's now a changing it's changing course because it would be a blow to america to say otherwise you know if go to you i mean the rhetoric and the reality on the ground i mean do you think the united states should be a little bit more nuanced in now i mean because if you put so much priority prioritizing security you get these kind of despotic regimes don't you. well there's a a. a a paradox at the center of american foreign policy these are the the middle east the greater middle east and it's the following it's quite simple actually united states has represented democratization for over two centuries now united states was the second country to become democratic or arguably even the first before britain depending how one defines it but it was one of the very very very few in the world netherlands britain united states and over the twentieth century especially since

woodrow wilson hundred years ago the united states government has made it its policy to enhance democracy to encourage democracy and has done so with extraordinary success russia as an example we we were part of the process certainly was i did a lot of russian are able would disagree with that very sort of feeling very strongly when you have the question that there is a forum or dictators that you can question all you like. excuse me i'm talking all right gentlemen states and i've been in that mode if we were assad did to stop here i'm going to have to go to a break and we'll go back to daniel when we get back from the break after a short break we'll continue our discussion on the middle east state. and.

the place of taking this team to the home straight. to the land developed by cossacks in ancient times. now watty goes to the center of russian defense production. live christianity and shamanism existed side by side for centuries. people in remote villages a cut off from the basics please take for granted. the republic russia close up on. otty. repairing a broken ancient. highway construction and humanitarian aid. has shady officials talking to spoils of war it's the people who pay the price. profiteering here is no longer just down to drug trafficking. afghanistan the dollars.

will. bring you the latest in science and technology from around russia. the future covered. kicking. and. welcome back to cross talk i'm here a little to remind you we're talking about change in the middle east. but before let's see whom russians blame for the region's instability. tunisia lebanon israel the greater middle east in general this own stable region is consumed by violence crisis and gravely comic and social realities and even israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu admitted the region's instability citing the

allstar of tunisia's president is a good illustration the public opinion agency lot of us and also who is to blame for the middle east instability twenty percent see the united states being at fault fourteen percent think we should blame islamic fundamentalists six percent also cite western countries still the question remains when will there be quiet insecurity in the region back to peter ok daniel before we went to the break you were saying that basically america is a beacon of democracy in the world in the bill and stephen i just almost want want to jump in there they did jump in there but we ran out of time so could you do so i will repeat your point oh i'd like to go to the bill and stephen on this issue go ahead. united states has been the motor force for democracy now there have been two major exceptions one is when faced with the taliban as of whether it be german or russian or chinese the united states has worked with non democratic countries to

find allies and the second has been the middle east in the middle east the problem has been even before islam as a became a major force the problem has been that in the middle east there is a inherent radicalism and so over and over again when tempted to go the democratic route american governments i found that this would bring our enemies to power and so there has been a hasn't see now that was changed in november two thousand and three when george w. bush that they had said and see is over we're going for democracy we're going to three years it became clear that what everyone feared which was that there would be this surge of our enemies coming to office coming to power getting stronger that policy was somewhat abandoned and now we have administration and obama that's not interested in democracy i believe that we united states should be pushing for democracy it is it is our it is what we do and we do it well but we should do it slowly the problem with bush is he did it too quickly he wanted elections now right

away within twenty months after the ouster of saddam hussein there were elections for prime minister in iraq no no no you go slowly you take years you start with da catcher you start with local municipal councils and weak you build up and up and up in other words democracy is counter-intuitive you can't just have democracy have to have an understanding that there's a rule of law and loyal opposition and freedom of speech and so forth and you don't just you know people just don't have that they're not born with it they have to learn it and therefore this is a slow progress probably the need to slow progress and i hope that this series of events in tunisia will lead to the u.s. government picking up again and bombing the station going back to what bush did but more so. only and consciously i'm honestly in the way bush did so we can help to build a base for democracy in the middle east such as has never existed before ok and if you inherently radical. now i mean i totally

disagree with what daniel pipes just said i mean to say that america has always been a driving force for democracy to make sure that democracy triumphs around the world is disingenuous and mean that the track record of. america supporting corrupt dictator and dictatorships around the world is well documented and the list of countries such countries is is endless and it has to be said that after nine eleven america has looked at the arab world and indeed the muslim world and the populations within muslim countries as potential terrorists and they have been investing billions and billions into countries like egypt or tunisia to make sure that religion is indeed suppressed and kept in check so that they don't have any problem with muslims anymore and that's the reality and to say otherwise these are not only in the general views right stephen you want to join me in their images

they make you feel very lesions even. go ahead stephen you know the united states has been deprived united states of their primary supporter of dictatorial regimes in the middle east and elsewhere in the world for many many decades we've even overthrown democratic governments like a mohammad mosaddegh in the fifty three right in the shard with his brutal socks secret police we armed and trained you know that this is a no for in a democracy even during the bush era that was just window dressing their image of iraq was about oil and empire it had anything more to do or democracy than it did about the so-called weapons of mass destruction. that the bush administration's allies fabricated you know the reality the reality. i mean he talked bush talked about spreading democracy for damascus to tehran well i think we all agree that syria and iran could use more democracy he didn't talk about spreading democracy from riyadh to cairo and in fact under bush we increased our security assistance to

oppressive regimes which. which use these security assistance to suppress civil society organizations struggling for democracy and then we turn around and say oh there's no democracy because it's not part of their culture we got to go slowly this we've got to go slowly line is what you know virtually every tyrant you know in left right and center has used for. forever to try to justify their rule people deserve their freedom and it's not the united states to offer it to them it's for them to claim for their own this very difficult when we are probably one of these days dictatorships and giving in the means of repression to suppress such pro-democracy movements don't you want to go in there and respond reply go ahead so go ahead daniel fascinating pop career contradiction it's a fascinating pot pourri of contradictions we've just heard let me make a few points first united states is not government under bush in particular was not

suppressing sloan was in fact and answering it i can't tell you how much money and i'm i'm looking to find out how much money the u.s. taxpayer has has spent on building mosques and madrassas in the muslim world it's hardly the actions of some insane thing about islam it's also about religion secondly i didn't know you didn't miss. completed and secondly. the in terms of democracy now well that's what you've got in iraq as i said twenty months was very fast between a stalinist dictatorship and voting for prime minister it didn't work it's not working it needs the historical record shows that democratization is a slow process i'm sorry if you're impatient bush was impatient you and bush. and patience and look what you get it's got to take some years give it time. but i think the point is here with the arsenal there's a point is hearing the problems in iraq are from the invasion not from the problems in iraq or from an invasion not for democracy though the problems in iraq are

because of a foreign illegal foreign military occupation which stirred up this extremist kind of reaction if democracy is a. natural leader in that country if we hadn't ported. saddam was a very very big struggle. we americans former i don't know why i never let me go to you i mean what tell me you know i know that it's a mythical thing but i like the term anyway the arab street here i mean what kind of example has been set what kind of events are being put into play because of tunisia and we again we all agree we don't know where it's going to go but i mean it must all across the mediterranean for sure people my saying there is hope out there now that you see how people will start building upon it in a way that is constructive if the united states just keeps its business its nose out and the european union leaves the. you know doesn't support these governments

anymore i mean there there is the wiggle room might there why are we talking about government support why don't we just leave them alone yes i mean the arab league summit is taking place at the moment in the chief of the arab league has said something very important about the situation in tunisia and indeed in the wider region he said the soul of the break of the middle east is broken because of deteriorating economic conditions and i think that's a very good point to make. the social economic conditions in north africa and the wider region. i mean they need to be looked at very closely. the the the riots basically in the region started off because of social you. in tunisia but also in neighboring algeria where people started demonstrating because of the soaring. prices of basic food basic commodities like bread butter and flour and it spread to other countries like egypt sporadically and the wider region and

there has been a shift then from so. riots and demonstrations to in an attempt to improve those social economic conditions and circumstances to demonstrations aimed at reforming the whole political system and introduce democracy which indeed goes hand in hand with improving social economic circumstances because it. fundamentally has to do with ending corruption and introducing fair political system which involves a redistribution of wealth daniel i mean you in the beginning of the program you were you were happy with the events that are being played out in tunisia doesn't have an ideological angle to it and i suppose you're referring basically mostly to islam but i mean why can't the united states not be so ideological in exporting democracy at least how we don't just stand there. because they just really

basically just reinforces it strategic interests that it's not for ideal interest here i mean can we just focus more on this socio economic to help these people and maybe that will help bring democracy about in the slow way that you mentioned. well i think we on this panel have much more harmony we talk about tunisia and we talk about the united states. enjoy talking about tunisia more than on states but to answer your question. i saw the obama statement last week congratulating me on the street as ambiguous that it's not indication that we're going to support others so for example of egypt it's not a rejection of what's happened it's saying that we need more time to figure out what we're doing here and so far as i can tell there has been no formulation of policy no figuring out what we do in tunisia nor in the in the in the wider middle

east so i think this is very much in flux but a lot has to do i think with how things turn out in tunisia if there is a smooth transition to i'm sorry i'm going to have to jump in here folks we've run out of time here hopefully the events in the tunisia will bring about a better life for them and maybe others in the greater middle east many thanks to my guest today in philadelphia london and in san jose and thanks to our viewers for watching us here darkie see you next time and remember a profitable.