at five thirty pm moscow time these are the headlines on r t nato's implementation of the resolution on libya undermines the un's authority and international war russia's foreign minister called on the alliance to stick to the original document or lose months once trotsky. a major breakthrough in the i'm not really good case as of recently arrested traction fugitive is officially charged with the journalist murder investigators claim the evidence they have proved the one carried out the

killing five years ago. and russia imports are fresh threats to both from the e.u. due to the deadly outbreak of the cole why bacteria across europe the complications from the infection has already claimed eighteen lives in the garden in germany. next war and peace in the middle east israel's vice prime minister give spotlight holes al gore know the inside track of the country's long term plans calling president obama's call for the country to roll back its one nine hundred sixty seven borders that's next.

hello yellow welcome to spotlight the info plan i think. today my guess is the hour. president obama called on israel to roll back to the half century old borders and start peace talks with the palestinians that this offer infuriates to the jewish state tell of the it is that guiding its territorial gains and blaming other regimes for the instability in the region its self what israel's long term policy here's the israeli vice prime minister moshe ya'alon. the israeli policy towards the palestinians has long been criticized in the world as inhumane but the country's politicians seem determined to stick to the tough line. before coming to moscow vice prime minister of israel moshe ya'alon says he didn't see any use for a peace agreement with the palestinians he blames the palestinian authority for not

being responsible enough and hinted there will be known peaceful solution or an end to violence soon. thank you very much for being with us in the studio thank you for inviting me well first question is about gives it to moscow some say that this israeli delegation that's in moscow now and that this visit is sort of a response to the visit of a joint palestinian delegation that week or so go. no not at all this is a to have been scheduled long ago as. we celebrated recently you can join us and you. can share between. we have many interests and commons and i'm here to discuss this interest especially interest of the korean well and fortunately this twentieth anniversary of relations

was marked by. the. expelling of israel's military pressure from moscow he was accused of our best peanuts and we have any consequences on russia's relations is it already having some cause and no consequences and now we have the proper channels to discuss what was it exactly is here is a case and there is a relation ship hasn't been harmed as a result of it it is all. ok another question that i think we. will be discussed here in moscow is the claims by israel that russian weapons are trickling to gaz and being used by those who launch rockets at israel russia says there is not enough evidence that a russian produced missiles could be used by the militants will you continue

discussing this subject and have you brought any any any proof to try to prove your point this issue is still discussed and for sure. israeli bus. was targeted by hamas to always it was in case of cornet like you tango do weapon or should i mean. so. we discussed. what we called the security channels on social government and i believe this issue will be settled because the world is awash of weapons stored in a boeing campus like syria and iran we believe that torture doesn't so we know russia doesn't sell this kind of weapons needle to kids while on the open hamas or other dog and usually reclaiming their claims. the problem. we believe that syria is an example of why these weapons to the tell all they always organisation is and you are of course we are not ready to accept it but you are not

only you but everybody in the world is accepting that terrorists around the world are using kalashnikov machine guns i mean so so so so what's the use trying to. make kalashnikov sufferable and other types of russian military equipment unacceptable if russia isn't selling them well i mean directly to terrorists i mean you might say that kalashnikov is not acceptable as well but you know you can't control it anymore what it can start it i do weapons or defense and all markets only source and argue orcutt's it's not their professional core which are thousands of them are spread all over the world and this is killing people we should control we are the three parties in the world we should control all the weapons flow otherwise you two of us might be harmed russian airliner might be

targeted by your use to buy russian made in defense. and this is a case where he's reading about this so philip reeves isn't think using russia out of providing the weapons to to to militants interests it's accusing russia of having not enough control over it so weapons is there the point we've got accused of not accusing probably one thing no more completely past the russian government along from his regime. and to not open to no. where near russia weapons to lead or syria or iran then the us is not there so. he believes as awesome government has to consider sending weapons to zero countries is russia is russia accepting except in this case to discuss it as probably your nose or some government console bit as the year s.

so you hardly it's. weapons deal a defense system to provide to talk to you on it has been canceled by the russian government you've really got only to push it very much and we sanction very much for you the russian government so we have to open channels to discuss such a mission speaking about he ran for i'm not mistaken these really really give and considers iran a potential enemy number one well i think that this issue is discussed with your russian opposite numbers with russian diplomats and politicians what do you expect from russia in respect of your relations with iran we believe the iranian regime we're not talking about going around be a religious leader on energy because he said tel aviv mean this is he winning he's governed as we don't consider the iranians or the enemy or for you but the analogy of course to wipe israel over the map of the us. we can't ignore it as you have

a geometric surely he's has become to be the main generate or instigator of instability in the middle east you can find it on a figure preaching in a negative manner. in any conflict in civilian in afghanistan in iraq in lebanon on in the policy of you know in what khomeini in yemen by providing weapons and money to because islamists challenges the games so it can't be ignored so you run energy claims for had your money in the middle east and you know that's true chill and the strait of reason is a challenge for the civilized world i would say and in this regard we call all our allies to include us. put the pressure on the surging first of all to stop the slow captivities like providing look at still hizbullah and hamas. in so many simular to kill each other and so forth and so forth they're not talking about stopping the

million to a new club what wrecked their emily to the no clearly you are no we can be a knight male not just full slate of for any civilized society this noncommercial logy i'm calling to impose that i bitterly said on first of all you know region and then all over the world it isn't a say only couple political team we should deal with it so we have the opportunity to discuss anything to call our allies to pressure and i be political pressure because normally personnel there this kind of pressure which we put on this logy you consider russia to be one of your airlines yes. now let's talk about relations with hamas you have been criticizing most who you call your allies for its relations and contacts with comments but the the the a policy of isolation of hamas has proved to be counterproductive venture.

you know even among friends there are differences it is very clear allows that we have differences in some ways. as a u.s. administrator and as your communities and i will be so busy to reason it's not suddenly where we show it is the last two years we have differences we although we share the same interests as we believe talking about us fighting to always in dealing with radical islam economic interests and so forth we might have differences and it's us regard yes we we argue was a calm us and still organization is a radical islamist movement calling actually for the destruction of the state a phrase that can't be tolerated and by anyone now we don't. you know we don't control anymore the gaza strip and it had become as a result of a mystery turn a situation to be the second dislike entity in the region the first is in iran and the second is in gaza sleepover started by hamas and i believe that all civilized

parts of the world should follow the quoted criteria which is russia is a member of the quantiles thomas should be master one should look overnight is were thought to exist and of course to be committed to all the former agreements between oz and feel which is not the case so we call to to isolate hamas politically speaking you go to recognizing israel's right to exist well fattah has recognized israel but as we see didn't get much in exchange i mean politically and that made hamas even less willing to key than discuss this issue don't you think that that here we see one of the i would say rare but mistakes of israeli foreign policy. you know it's very important question. hamas and fatah. both of them

are not ready to work organize and use the us right to exist as a nation state of the jewish people even mahmoud abbas and according to all still. signed by of they recognize easily this is a fact but they say we have to resist it by all means we have in our body killed the coa which means to resist the zionist entity in the state of his life and even what about us is not only to recognize israel as a jewish state he said julie something as a response to openness to speech he's not thirty two to say that any truly tauriel compromise which is talk now based on what is called the sixty seven line might be considered as the end of course you can find out your rights as they have claims all to haifa tel aviv they call each morning us so we don't have the ground media to discuss it with the fatah role of course to discuss it with hamas what we ask

and talking about the political options first of all for mahmoud abbas to goody two with organized is those who live through this to the jewish state in any final settlement and to consider it is the end of conflict the finality of claims this is not the case will fall so we are stuck in the political process says moshe ya'alon the israeli vice prime minister spotlight will be back after we take a short break we'll continue this interview in the last stand in the mid south stay with us then that. well. bringing you the latest in science and technology from the ground.

we've got the future covered. and welcome back to spartan mind i'm older now than just a reminder that my guest in the studio today is going to share ya'alon the israeli vice prime minister. let's talk about american proposals the recent the recent initiatives coming from washington sounding concerning the

settlements which is pretty controversial already mentioned the the new states of relations between tel aviv and washington is really what's furious about that barack obama's suggestion that that the palestine borders should be considered in the borders of nine hundred sixty seven and well gee accept a two state solution in principle first of all do like the principle and just so our policy is very clear for us we don't want to govern the palestinians now according to austin or we thought about having two states for two peoples and one of us in egypt. people say even to people as he denies the existence of jewish people who claims judaism being diligent it's neither nationality and all people who would so why should a religion have a state and this is a problem so when there has been obama or paul doing initiative we are furious

because he put first of all the issue of territories when we have to negotiate territories as a policy and has just to get there not to give anything and this is a case it's also what deed is a as quote from the palestinians is the last twenty years. as a response for giving in the territory instead of land for peace we got planned for terrible with more than one sells and casualties and what gets him more thousand of them so this is a case no not now to put at all posen can we trust a full release gusto italy we are not ready to make it we would like to hear what i mentioned earlier our ease up a muslim who got us the police still you do is ready to work all night is allowed to go to the jewish state yes or no he said never so what are we talking about and if anything at all compliment in my eyes again only good lines will be considered

at the end of counting the finale of claims so you know we have that if you just issue to the end of the days it's not the end of claims this kind of proposal is not acceptable you said you said that the palestinians according to a balanced plan will be only gaining in not giving but if it would be a policy of our swapping territories one in exchange for their would you be ready to please consider that it was considered will be giving and getting. it's not giving and getting swap is giving. the end they get territorial either form is the west bank or from the state to freeze or they just get they don't give any sink this is a case for about twenty years or seventeen years since it seems also and we have to explain to us. yes why lead us of it and it can be a good thing and annapolis failed in all the cases israel was ready to go to the two states for two peoples solution which will in which waters would you would you

consider and independent person states i'm not going to go shoot it now i have to negotiate with the palestinians but prime minister netanyahu in his speech said we would be very generous and of course the sixty seven lines. are not defensible borders this is our experience in sixty seven years old perience as we delivered perito it was a palestinians after all still any thirty two in which will deliver to the posting us had become to be he to kill all unjust homicide bombers launch of orcas launchers so we have to take it in a car you can't ignore it so we have to consider ever seeing but it should be bleak but folklore and not just to give the palestinians tell it we said it was netanyahu is trip to washington and his negotiations were unquestionably a failure but the question is was it a failure of israeli policy of american policy or of palestinian helps.

i don't think that it was a failure of things or no so coarsely move the process i believe i believe that it was and moment of clarity we claim that the israeli palestine conflict he's nominated in the international arena to include among our allies but too many misconceptions what a conflict is of is about those those who claim vidia israeli palestinian conflict is a call for instability in the middle east it is nonsense how many conflicts and village of shia sunni we are not involved in it persian are what we are we don't take part in neat sectarian violence in ins are countless we are not zero it is not because of our even the operating now or in the of cantons is. because of islam so we unite and we have to compete very clearly in front of all allies and those who believe that the conflict started in sixty seven it's a game it's a lie the reject the outside egypt is the idea of the jewish state even before the

creation of the story jew state it didn't start in sixty seven it's not going to be added in the lines of sixty seven so this guy the response action was the opportunity for a family still and a plan you know to apply fight it was a moment of clarity we believe in the speech and i believe that it will want to feel and it's unquestionably smooth and a little bit the fact of a balanced speech on the borders that it's it's very clear as are three we have disputes we obama's administration is the light of what again we should be that we shouldn't be ludo said we should speak frankly and i believe that that was one of the achievements of prime minister's visit to the washington post is going to and. you mention the regimes and the unrest in the region in the middle east israel the reaction to revolutions to treat your popular uprising was was

pretty cautious why because because it's easier for you to deal with a tater's or because you don't believe in democracy in the arab world as it is iraq says very good question we would like to see democracy as. we would like to see democracies around us we believe that if we really have more democracy assad and the only one in this region. it would be a better future for them against having said that we identify as a positive elements in our society and those who have been exposed in the last couple of fields to the serialised i. just like freedom human lives we minimize and so forth. but they are not the dominating power in any conference they initiated the op wising in egypt about the dominican political power is muslim

model and again logical islam element so that this. kind of pollution will be exploited biological elements and its it might bring about instead of. spring it wanted to bring about winter so we have to deal with these very carefully we believe that there are societies on or like for democracy democracy doesn't start by elections as many western policies believe we don't believe in it and should start by education and education it's a long process and i think generation so we have to look at these very carefully cautiously as you mentioned and to try to approach those moderate pragmatic element to our job and if the extremists. it's not going to be a stimulus situation in the middle east anyhow and you have to follow it as we live

in this tough neighborhood you seem to understand more about the genesis of democracy than people washington because for them it was it was a very long time ago i was you know i said years ago this was one of was a dispute with the four administrations they talked about democratization and by elections they allowed hamas to participate in the political process in the palestinian i mean hamas ones elections impose immediately non-democratic the dream islamist regime this is a case where to believe that israel's reaction if the state of palestine will be recognized and what may become the be a member of the united nations how would you react to the evidence or or or or you know a common thing about you know me of course. we claim and we have to warn all for m's. that any you want to call a porch and the palestinian easily protestant conflict is going to be very dangerous for western interests or similar good and tell us that what you claim why

because if the palestinians don't have the option to not only go sure to find a settlement they would prefer it what will come out of it we believe a second hamastan in the west bank i find an australian tempting good result it's not going to serve me that easily the worst will jordanians to us not even american or we will pin or russian interest it is we believe to have another hama stand in in the west bank so we reject we strongly object zedillo for bringing this issue with tools in the united nations security council level and to approve it. seventy percent of palestinians according to the latest polls i believe strongly believe that that there will be a new intifada if the deadlock in may get to see asians contain yours what will be israel's reaction first of all did you agree that this possibility exists and what may be your reaction. we should be ready for any development but this is the

best and the most reflection for to me claim you know i sailed as a don't lead good intelligence on the elite we still have been an equal force and i claim to be informed of history of being in some in ninety five in typical forcible . the tough part of it i didn't plan is even for conciliation coexistence from the state or from the encounter really prepared them for jihad in the sense that i didn't know it i opened the palestinian textbooks and you creational coequal watching zone media and they educated young generation to hate us and you see old kids were explosive gets to kill whom it is not done to people nomads and i'm not talking about a three year old cancer yes no educated people will explosive dance and only side goers as all moderates this is a case for peace and so there will be little any new longer facilities

islam should be ready to be from its thank you thank you very much for being with us and just reminds that that right yesterday was moshe ya'alon the israeli vice prime minister thanks that's it for now from all of us here if you want to have your sound spotlight or have someone in mind for you think i said to me next time it's not feline at calgary not after. our year let's give the show answer x. move that with more and then they are out he can take care. thank you. for the full song we've got it for. the biggest issues get a human voice face to face with the news makers on.

in indonesia oh geez available in the ground you heard tom sure it's a media hotel the ritz carlton hotel the hotel the film millennium hotel in china you can see.