joyce leave it to some of those figures who took the grand imperial. to tortuously to school until you can a little closer to the job it's a duty to go on a clear road to the colonel was a photo as a retreat. it's all passed down or this is a senior person amounts on the first prime minister who gets a grilling of paul events over his toys with disgrace news corp executives cars and songs played the song of the plane scandal that's already that's a step or the rest of resignation is that for the. last remaining hope problem something wanted by the u.n. on the balkans conflict discounted a savvier reference fugitive commander brought on how it is a problem for companies lasers it's having to overcome obstacles to it the new membership is. on too much in journalistic usual thorazine is

a false impression to talk opposed with spying for russia they could set a clear message to the rest of george's need you can use. while the us is running out of time to deal with it debt crisis policy speech in the bell also is whether it's all about politics while the new color me cost talk is next. can. you please. logan welcome to cross talk i'm hearing about dead deadlock as a deadline for the u.s. to increase its debt ceiling looms would appear to be more about politics and upcoming elections than fixing a crippling problem as the u.s. courts financial disaster do americans have an appetite for asperity. plan can. start. to cross not to get

an impasse i'm joined by my guests in new york now ken which he is editor and publisher of left business observer and howard gold he is a columnist for market watch and founder of the political blog the independent agenda all right gentlemen this is crossfire that means you can jump in anytime you want but first let's have a look at the debate unraveling on capitol hill. just under two weeks this is how much time washington has left to raise the federal debt ceiling set at fourteen point three trillion dollars and it's the u.s. that steadily creeps towards its legal limit democrats and republicans agree that if they were to avert a default would trigger an economic catastrophe a catastrophe that would not only hit the u.s. but would also undermine an already fragile global economy clearly that's what so far as to default on that it would be a major. crisis because the treasury securities viewed as the safest most liquid security in the world it's the foundation for most of our financials for

much of our financial system. and the notion that it would become suddenly unreliable illiquid would throw shock waves of the entire global financial system current u.s. public debt amounts to fourteen point two trillion dollars and is more than ninety eight percent of the country's two thousand and ten g.d.p. if the debt ceiling is not raised the administration has warned it will not have the resources to honor its external debt obligations as well as internal entitlements such as social security benefits i cannot guarantee those checks go out on august third if we haven't resolved this issue because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it however short the default may be it will undercut the credibility of the u.s. financial system in the world damage the value of the dollar and drain investor confidence major credit agencies such as moody's and standard and poor's have threatened to downgrade the u.s. rating and what we're looking for is a raising of the limit it doesn't matter the process that they get. the debt limit

has already been raised almost one hundred times and doing it now shouldn't pose a serious challenge if it weren't for partisan friction over ways to slash the budget democrats have put forth several deals that are have to spending cuts and they struggle to get republicans on board over their opposition to tax increases everything's on. table it's raising taxes on americans the american people well analysts continue to issue warnings president obama has been adamant about hammering out an agreement has called the debt ceiling crisis a unique opportunity to do something big there is little doubt that a deal will be reached by the august second deadline though so far tackling america's that and reforming its the school policies has been a political football and many want to take advantage of you want to be responsible for my chair and i for cross talk our team. ok dave if i can go to you first in new york what is this all about because we just

we just heard in that report the debt ceiling is any increase over and over and over again but all of a sudden this time it's a huge political event is sidelined everything else why is this time. well it's interesting you suggest the other day we have policy that's going on to get exactly pretty good idea but i think the republicans would like to use this they're playing a game of chicken they want to use this as an excuse to manage impose deep cuts in medicare and social security programs that are very popular very successful and that kind of agenda could not survive the normal political debate polls repeatedly show that americans don't like the idea of cutting medicare and social security because they benefit scores of millions of people and everyone in the society will presumably benefit from the eventual so there's just no appetite for the kind of agenda they are trying to sell. their product blackmail the president to giving way on this and the president has demonstrated in the past that he is a master of preemptive compromise so i think they're hoping that he will just blink

and give way and they'll get far more than they could through a normal political debate when you think about that howard is this is all just politics because. everyone i think assumes there's going to be some kind of deal again with what everyone wants to see is someone caught holding the bag and that's what the republicans want they want obama to blink and to cave in well because we do you they're going to have to have this ceiling raised. well i think i agree partially with doug but i think we have to specify what part of the republican party we're talking about in two thousand and ten republicans won the house there were eighty seven freshmen representatives in washington never served before who represent the tea party which is adamantly for cutting spending and these people are aleck did on that basis and they've come to washington with what many say is a religious zeal to cut spending to the exclusion of almost everything else i

personally think this is both a spending problem and a revenue problem for fifty years from one nine hundred fifty to two thousand we averaged about eighteen percent of g.d.p. came in from tax revenues twenty percent went out from spending a very manageable two percent gap that persisted more or less through the two thousands on till two thousand fiscal two thousand and nine when the recession and the in the fiscal cry in the financial crisis caused it to go to fifteen percent of revenue and twenty four percent of outlays a nine percent gap that's really what explains the problem so i personally think that you need to address both sides of the issue revenues and spending and there are different ways to deal with it but what do you think obama uses the term grand bargain what would be the grand bargain in your opinion. well i think what's eventually going to urge is that there will be some cuts to medicare social

security more than the democratic base we happy with and that could cause a vamose of problems down the road. then maybe closing some some kind of tax loopholes you know the private jet loophole which is more about posturing than actual revenue the carried interest we pull for private equity guys. the i.m.f. at least on a review of debt reduction packages or deficit reduction taxes around the world with a generally have about a four to one ratio of spending cuts to tax increases i presume that's the kind of . bargain that we'll see come out of this but. the tea party who represent less than a quarter of the house of representatives they are a minority view. nonetheless want to push it up to one hundred percent spending cuts that you know it's just not some compromise that's not bargaining that's just they want to get their way in there they're willing to push the economy over a cliff to get their way out of it go ahead how did it but it's very interesting is because the republicans what the what the republicans want to bad economy going

into the election cycle go ahead. well i don't know about that but i do know that the tea party people are now really have really it's the tail wagging the dog in the republican party and even the leadership is very very worried about their influence for one simple reason in america we have primaries where in each party they vote the candidates get chosen and and if the tea party people or any of the congressmen republican congressmen vote you know for a big deal that includes tax increases they're guaranteed to get a primary challenge next year that's the first electoral challenge they will face and that's what's on their minds that's what they're really worried about doug is it all about ideology i mean this is extreme i think howard's got a really good point there i mean they just want to get reelected again i'll go back to my earlier point if they don't really care about the economy is not affected the worse the better for the republicans i want to challenge obama in two thousand and twelve go ahead oh i actually think i think some of the people i would agree

welcome so how he's going to go go go ahead ahead go. but yeah they'll face what i may challenge quite possibly i think that the tea party people have been elected from very conservative districts in less conservative strict they might not win a challenge but you know polls show that the public insofar as understands this issue doesn't like the idea of raising the debt ceiling but realize that you have to do something about getting the deficit down over the longer term and want some kind of mix of tax increases and spending cuts now if you ask the question very specifically do you would you like to see taxes rise on people with six figure incomes or would you would rather see medicare and social security cut there's no question that people would like to see rising taxes on the upper brackets that's in the sixty to seventy percent range this is the polling that is pretty strong but that this is not what the true believers in the tea party want they want you know a very dramatically smaller government they've had it out for the new deal and the

great society for generations really great we can go back to the night or early one nine hundred fifty s. to hear some of this new deal rhetoric they've just achieved a kind of salience in american politics that they didn't used to have it used to be very much a minority fringe you and now well though it's still a minority fringe you it's more like a quarter of the population and somehow are really dominating the discourse partly because the president is not not a tough gardener i think partly because he would like to see some of these cuts himself he's not the radical socialist of tea party fantasy he is very much a centrist deal see market friendly democrat and wouldn't mind seeing some cutbacks in medicare it's most security and maybe even partial privatization of social security although that would be quite a dramatic blow to the right of people and the democratic party when you think about how it is because you know balmy i would just a call to my house or you had to jump in here i would disagree with todd on one thing i mean i think there are more than a fringe i think they represent

a substantial part of the republican party and more importantly they turn out big in elections. they turned out in two thousand and ten and obama supporters didn't obama does have a problem with his base if he agrees to cuts in some of these programs these the social programs that are at the core of the democratic amission a lot of people are going to sit home not work for him not give money not given the kind of enthusiastic support that helped him win comfortably in two thousand and eight whereas the tea party people are likely to turn out because they're angry they're upset they're frustrated even if they get some of what they want they want all of what they want because that's their vision of a country we have two different visions of a country in a way facing off against each other. doug you want to jump in there and actually you know i think yeah i think the democrats would actually welcome a tea party take over the republican party to some degree you know if we survive the debt default the world that we're barrels a year from now the i think i would like to run against

a radicalized republican party his dream would be you know michele bachmann because these candidates you know i think probably represent twenty five percent of the american electorate they are enthusiastic and obama is going to suffer from some kind of good moralization of his base but if the republican party is seen as rabid in saying that just goes against the american grain the american states are going to jump in here we're going to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on the u.s. debt stay with our team. can. we go see. the biggest issues get a human voice ceased to face with the news makers on the. wealthy british

scientists. market. scandal find out what's really happening to the global economy for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines to cause a report card. suz .

discover is. communicate with the wild. they come free to. see what nature can give you. slept and you can see. the same. song on peter lavelle to remind you we're talking about america's debt crisis. and

you can say. ok if i go back to you all through this debate a heated debate on capitol hill. we hear a lot of numbers coming out what could happen if there is a default and i do the republicans say obama and his people are playing so using scare tactics is not a fair thing to say. well i think they can manipulate you know that we hear this august second deadline i think they can manipulate for weeks maybe months and play games and keep things going for a while so it's not a hard deadline by any means but you know if there is a default that is very really really dangerous you know u.s. treasury securities are going to rock the world financial markets and some things that nobody's really talked about but i think could be a problem is that there are a whole lot of rivet of contracts and such that depend on cash flows from treasury interest payments we don't really know what happened that would be interrupted it could be quite disastrous as we found out in the mortgage securities crisis we didn't know how vulnerable we were to what actually all blew up so we could see

something very similar should should it have all come to pass how and why what about this idea of just maybe like three months you know extend the the ceiling in three months then three months is that just a way to keep this topic in the in the as a debate a debating point and not talking about unemployment and talking about other problems of the u.s. economy has. well that's a good point president obama has ruled that out he said he would not agree to that one thing that's being discussed in washington now is a proposal by the senate minority leader mitch mcconnell republican from kentucky who saying ok we will raise the debt limit in three installments before the election give the president the authority to do it apparently so it's on his head and that's one thing that's being discussed of the kind of ugly stupid kinds of things that come out of washington that people hate i do think though your point about unemployment is really really key because republicans won the last election saying democrats hadn't focused enough on jobs that was true they haven't either

and there's a reason for it i believe that public policy there are no real public policy remedies for the kind of employment situation we face right now nine point two percent official unemployment maybe sixteen percent employed or underemployed maybe many others that aren't even counted we're seeing structural changes in the economy that neither the pump priming of keynesianism the monetarism up the monetary spending of the fed of milton friedman nor the tax cuts of the supply siders have been able to address and that's the underlying issue and that's the thing the politicians won't tell the public they're good do you think about that that's very interesting what howard had to say i mean the tool box is empty as i want is that what's happening here. well old fashioned and i think actually some sort of old style keynesian programs would would have an effect but i think there is a serious structural problem the u.s. economy there's no doubt about that we've. seen for the last three decades really

stagnant and falling real wages and stagnant or falling household incomes whole lot more instability and volatility in people's economic fates and for many decades that instability was somewhat papered over by a lot of borrowing we saw a lot of credit card use and especially mortgage use you know from during them from the mid ninety's to mid two thousand and then it all fell apart and i think now the u.s. economy is really just kind of limping along because there is just no dynamism to it at this point there's no leading sector it's not like you know the one thousand nine hundred we had steel and railroads in the early twentieth century we had on the deal. you know after world war two it's been stationed there was there was a feeling maybe in the ninety's that technology could do that but that didn't really pan out so there's no dynamism anywhere and i think we could develop some dynamism in a real beating sector if we fostered clean energy environmentally friendly

technologies which would require government action which be a long term growth strategy but we're not really talking about that republicans don't like things like railroads because i think they're pansies in europe because it's seen as being a thing of european pansy's like so there's just there's no dynamism there's no leaving sector and i think what we're seeing now is the underlying structural pathology of the u.s. economy the polarization the instability really. and i think our day in the sun perhaps is past and we're now suffering from from really really long term problems that we can't even have a grown up conversation about i'm always positively defeat to make tragic and embarrassing go ahead go ahead our diet. let me jump in and make one very interesting example and yet in monday's wall street journal they reported that the wireless industry which is having record revenue record numbers of people being drawn in by smartphone employment is actually down twenty percent from the peak in america and they've lost twenty thousand jobs since the recession ended why is that

because a lot of people with sma starting smartphones are technologically savvy they don't need call centers they don't need service reps companies are cutting those people technology and product has increased productivity and cut the need for workers this is a global phenomenon the second part of that of course is that a lot of the things that used to be made in the united states are now being made in china in indonesia in malaysia cambodia eastern europe plenty of other places we're seeing a lot of these structural issues of as the economy evolves a lot of people are not prepared to work for facebook and and linked in and twitter and all the new startups who are hiring ph d.'s and masters graduates in computer science and m.b.a.'s from stanford but the vast majority the public does not have those skills now what you know shouldn't the united states be taking caring a page from the european script from the euro zone script because. that's what's

the reality there are really going to be eurozone may have by ten years just five growth you know austerity increased taxes that's the only way they're going to get out of their mess why doesn't the u.s. do it. i think for one thing american working class has been experiencing austerity for several generations now so you know it's not it would not be a novelty but if we look at the european example of the countries that have cut their budgets have not seen their economies turn around if they had their problems if you could britain now is on the leading edge of an austerity program and we've seen investment fall off and retail sales weaken their very dramatically so the british economy is not strengthening in response to the budget cutting as a lot of budget cutters claim it would it's doing quite the opposite greece and ireland are sinking deeper as they cut i think we may see in similar things happening in spain and italy coming up it's that's the economics one hundred thirty

s. that's the vicious cycle of deflation and depression and i would hope that we don't follow that route but we may as specially if we have some kind of debt crisis and funding crisis and then god knows where would it go ahead our campaign but yes i do keynesianism works only to a certain degree in the united states in the one nine hundred thirty s. it was really only world war two which got us out of the crisis when we were we had when we had deficits went up to thirty percent of g.d.p. i mean nope no domestic outlook is going to support spending at that level. you know what we know i think what i'm saying is what i'm saying is that the pump priming doesn't really work after a certain point. ok well we had a very very strong growth between one hundred thirty three and thirty seven i mean we had. very close to ten percent growth between one hundred thirty three one hundred thirty seven the unemployment rate fell by ten fifteen points it was very successful the w.p.a. put a lot of people to work all that sort of thing and did

a lot of useful work i mean it's not it's a commonplace now that yes the new deal stuff didn't work but then roosevelt under the advice of morgan thought as treasury secretary said business is suffering from a lack of confidence so if we just cut the budget at the top of the sturdy program then business will will shake off its bad feelings and start investing like the opposite happened and we entered a second wave of depression after nine hundred thirty seven i'm afraid we're going to repeat that mistake it is not right you know we're not experiencing making thirty's levels of unemployment but if we repeat that. brace more through the nine hundred thirty seven i think we're really going in trouble and it looks like we're heading in that direction howard is the you we keep in with this world and we just were talking about the debt ceiling but let's talk about the debt i mean what does it take for the united states to start paying off that huge mountain of debt i mean it's almost impossible to imagine that number ok and most calculators can't use that number it's too big. well it is so huge i mean i suppose i am last week which

is saying that if you if you look over a long long period of time medicare alone has fifty trillion dollars that's right fifty trillion dollars of obligations going off over the next say twenty years or with thirty years this is a huge huge problem and i think the debt ceiling the last year's election the debt ceiling is only the beginning of a discussion that needs to take place here in the united states because the public i think i think doug pointed out correctly that the public supports these programs is not onboard to some radical surgery and i also agree with him that it needs to be planned carefully over the next few years but there is a debt problem all the major industrial countries have this problem simply because the population is aging is going to be bet is to need to rely on government benefits and the number of workers is not growing in fact it's shrinking so that the ratio between the number of employed and the number of people they support you know is getting to a point where it's really not sustainable so we're going to need to have this

conversation we're going to need the public is going to need to be educated and discuss it and make up their minds but ultimately we will have to approach this long term spending problem very seriously what about that it's a conversation i had. it's a conversation it's a conversation we need to have over a long period of time it's not something we need to do with a gun to our head like the way it's going on now. b.o.'s aggression budget actually with the actions of the deficit or. that most of that most of the deficit we're experiencing now that's nine ten percent of g.d.p. deficit we've had for less a couple of years as a result of the recession and should the economy recover which is certainly not proven but should it recover the congress does nothing under current legislation according to cabo but deficit will shrink to just over three percent of g.d.p. in the coming years and doesn't really become a problem for another five or ten years so we have the time to have a serious conversation about what kind of society we want what kind of economics

that has and how we want to pay for it had our ok howard last work the business when i look that way howard you got the last word is ahead right. well the last word basically is i think as i said this is the first the first of a long series of discussions of this i think are right we should not be deciding this with a gun to our head we should go ahead raise the debt ceiling and then have a serious debate in this country about how we're going to deal with the debt problems long term and the different solutions for it ok ok gentlemen let's see what happens on the on august third many thanks to my guest today in new york and thanks to our viewers for watching us here r.t. see you next time and remember rostov.

from.

people. in india because he's afraid of the movie goer.