when dead bird. and pacific predator a double shark attack on russia's eastern seaboard has experts baffled by the rare incident and while local authorities are offering a bounty for the fish some tourists are demanding a refund from holiday companies fearing that they may become the next victim. back to washington for part two of the only on the show. all right it's time for tonight's told time award and tonight it goes to everyone's used to be favorite before she was completely forgotten about tea party or christine o'donnell you know the i'm not a witch lady and the former senate candidate she's now written a new book called troublemaker so to promote her book she went on piers morgan tonight for an interview however when piers decided to grill her about one of the topics that she wrote about in her book gay marriage christine generally character

talk about it right now i'm curious about whether you support me you're borderline being a little bit you know i really i obviously want to talk about the issues that i choose to talk about in the book well don't you think as a host if i say this is what i want to talk about that's what we should address. not really your answer should yeah ok i'm being pulled away you know we turned down another interview for this where you you go. that's right christine declared it's over and just walked out and i can't say that i'm surprised that another tea partier dodge the issue of gay marriage and a one on one discussion but let's get back to christine's reaction obviously this abrupt ending to a talk show interview was enough to get the media talking so when she went off as a show to discuss what happened she didn't leave she said that she didn't leave

because of the questions on gay marriage you know you see according to the former candidate piers it went too far making her uncomfortable with his creepy line of questioning. as i said in another interview when they're sitting there pressing you on personal intimate questions and you're saying i don't want to go there he could have said you know what's your mother's name and i would have been like come on let's stop i wanted to stop that borderline sexual harassment that was going on. borderline sexual harassment is she kidding me now we just showed you the clip from the actual segment and yes piers was asking her questions guess what christine that's what happens when you agree to the interview i love her she makes it seem like he was asking her stuff that was just so wildly out of line and inappropriate he was asking about a subject which she wrote about in her book which she went on his show to be interviewed about and a subject which happens to be a very important political debate in today's country those are not creepy questions that's called an interview oh you know there is just so much material on her

dabbling in witchcraft and masterbating rhetoric claiming that school shootings happen weekly because there's no prayer in school she got off easy with the questions that piers asked her but for her then to go on t.v. say that his questions about gay marriage that was borderline sexual harassment that's just pathetic because you can't handle answering a simple question you cry sexual harassment it's embarrassing it be little's the cause of the women who are actually sexually harassed every day in this country and women who fought long and hard for protections against sexual harassment which you seem to think is just a made up idea that you can throw around for sympathy in public city well let me say i have no sympathy whatsoever for you it's high time that you stop playing the victim card because right now you're embarrassed meant to win it so for falsely claiming that she was sexually harassed by piers morgan because he asked about her position on gay marriage christine o'donnell is tonight's tool time winner. yesterday the obama administration announced

a new policy when it comes to deportations of undocumented immigrants according to homeland security secretary janet napolitano the cases of three hundred thousand people currently in deportation proceedings will be reviewed on a case by case basis or the goal of providing relief to those who are in the country illegally but who pose no threat to national security or public safety and many expect young people those who were brought here as children and grew up and went to school in the country and who would who would have been helped excuse me by the dream act which failed to pass last year they are expecting those people to be at the top of this list see if we look at obama's record thus far last year almost four hundred thousand people were deported and while the claim is always been that they focus only on the worst of the worst the statistics prove otherwise only half of those reported were so-called criminals seven percent were based on traffic violations twenty three percent were drug violations fourteen percent drunk driving violations so this new move is a welcome one for those fighting against tough deportation policies but is it enough how many millions will still live in fear without comprehensive immigration

reform and joining me from our studio in new york is immigration attorney michael wildes managing partner at wiles and weinberg law offices mike i want to thank you for joining us tonight and for starters or you i'm good thank you let's start with the legal aspect here right so three hundred thousand cases which are already within this deportation process here are going to be reviewed on a case by case basis what does that actually mean are these people already in the system it's not like they've already been deported there in the court system. this is merely a band-aid on a cancer alone there better eleven million plus people here in the awfully there are seven thousand ice agents about two hundred something immigration judges not enough airplanes and coughs or beds to house and deport these individuals and this is merely a band-aid on a growing cancer it's an affront to law enforcement who worked very hard to get those three hundred people into the system to say we're going to be lenient and

it's really a lot of hogwash to believe that they're going to give this entitle me to the dream act candidates even one district director i think in atlanta said earlier today that they're going to ignore it as far as they're concerned it's business as usual in the going to deport people as handily as they need to four hundred thousand people were deported in the last two years the president does not have enough initiative officers or resources to remove the eleven million plus and we're going through in the extraordinarily excruciating economy where these individuals not only contribute billions of dollars on to the tax role in the treasury but help remind us of the very d.n.a. that made america special and that is our immigration heritage now why do you think it is that the obama administration announced this policy now i was just ranting the other day about the fact that there were protests across the u.s. protesting about his deportation policy protests in a secure communities program and nobody was covering it and the media but does this mean that the obama administration actually paid attention because they are

protesting in front of his campaign offices. i'm a i'm a former federal prosecutor a former mayor and a democrat and i'm disappointed democrat in this administration and particularly on this policy the government now says they want to clear the docket from the traffic resources and focus on getting hardened criminals and felons out of this country no this is not the right message to citizens and law enforcement with our homeland preparedness in jeopardy and our economy held in the bands were immigrants can contribute from the hospitality to the agricultural hubs this is the wrong way to cure the deafening silence in washington i'm about ready to teach immigration law in a law school where my father taught for thirty two years and i'm a second generation immigration lawyer we all know that the powers vested in congress and just because they can't get their act together for politics doesn't mean the president should be excused on the eve of an election to put

a band-aid on this issue certainly not when he goes to you know he goes to challenge governors and courts saying that they have no right to protect their financial treasuries and interests because it's a federal issue and then when given the authority does nothing again let's put the camera on the on the subject here we're talking about three hundred thousand people in the system the leniency that they're promising is nothing more than cosmetic and it's not going to address the porous borders we have the fact that we have a departure system that is broken and nonexistent and the fact that students clerics diplomats and others have guys themselves historically and have insidious terrorist cells in this country still a decade from these attacks where are we in this war on terrorism where are we on treating people you mainly they've removed people over traffic stops you have no idea how many times we get phone calls in the middle of the evening from a wife or a husband who's stopped at a red light is this what america is like these ice officers these customs border

patrol. are in jeopardy their lives are in jeopardy with drug cartels in the southern border and all sorts of other challenges that they have this is the wrong imperative for them to europe and the wrong cure to a broken system i'm just curious though so you mention of course of the power here lies within congress right we're still waiting for a comprehensive immigration reform to come from congress but the interesting thing is is that when the dream act was being debated last year in congress the president said that he had already used all the administrative powers that he had and yet here we have what seems to be an administrative power where the president just goes around congress and announces this new program how far could he actually take that if he wanted to i mean you call this a band-aid but how much could he do on his own. excellent question you know the president and congress have the capacity when. japan and haiti before it had all sorts of natural calamities to give authority to individuals the president and

congress each have authority in the immigration act with the operations instructions the foreign affairs manual through its agencies through u.s. c.i.s. through state department to issue all sorts of relief to the millions upon millions of people that are here i'm not advocating for amnesty we don't want to create the next generation of people that will ignore laws because we are a nation of laws but we have to remind ourselves that the tools that are available to our president to our congress should be used and right now there is a debate between the two of them where they're kind of not being each other in the eyes rather than doing the people's work and the reason they're not doing it is politics and that's the reason on the need of an election we're going to appear lenient but these officers these well intended law enforcement ice agents and otherwise are now getting mixed directions from their commander in chief and that again is a bad message when we have a war on terrorism afoot and economy that's fledgling and a great tool in our arsenal that would help us on both fronts and that is

immigration our mike i want to thank you so much for joining us tonight and you know definitely seems like there are a lot of people that don't think this is enough some people are happy by could just be an election will see how long that there's you know i actually in the right direction alone it's a step in the right direction but fortunately it's way too late and way too small all right michael thank you so much. now still to come tonight fireside friday and on tap and happy hour one g.o.p. candidate earned the title of maverick because he trusts scientists on climate change and michele bachmann reveals one of her enemies rest of the night that. i. to. get to. the bucket.

it. took a while to. say. this street still keeps its secrets it's time to reveal the truth to the soviet files on the way. it can hit doctors' wives policeman's wives ministers wires and i just prayed that if you couldn't find me if i could just live through the night that i would get my kids out of here because i knew that what was going to happen was that he was going to kill me many victims don't understand that domestic violence includes verbal abuse psychological abuse physical abuse and sexual abuse at least four million women are affected by abuse every year those are only two options that i saw at

that moment either i'm going to kill him i'm me in jail or he's going to kill it says. the old coot bringing you the latest in science and technology from the realm. we dumped the future covered. it's nice fireside friday is with you. there needs to be a very serious and very public discussion about the crackdown on social media and cell phone service that we've seen over the last few weeks now we've covered here on this show the british prime minister threatening to shut off social networks for those they believe are using the tools to participate in riots the bar transit

authority shutting down cell phone service proceeding a planned protest to supposedly keep commuters say this is all a sure sign of where things are going it's a very good indicator of how of the result react to what they consider public disturbances and it's a threat to freedom of speech to the freedom of assembly and of the ability to communicate what's most disturbing here as it is being done in the same countries which just months ago berated leaders in the arab world for doing the same thing what egypt or tunisia shut down social media as their people rising up it was considered an affront to democracy our secretary of state gave speeches launched initiatives worth millions of dollars to create programs for those dissidents to be able to circumvent the restrictions put in place by authority to leaders the freedom to communicate to organize on the internet those are spoken about as universal rights and yet when people use the exact same tools to either organize for riots in the u.k. or for peaceful protests like they did in san francisco suddenly the same tactics

those dictators used those became ok now the truth is yes technology can be used for both good and for bad for riots or for peaceful protest but it's become more reliant on these tools governments or law enforcement they're going to take it upon themselves to decide when it's good and when it's back forget about overarching principles this situation or that situation will be considered different they'll be an exception but exceptions dangerous precedents exceptions are the first steps to an erosion of civil liberties and we've already experienced this firsthand and here in america over the last ten years nine eleven has been used as an excuse by the government to systematically strip us of our rights and create. exceptions in emergency situations and the fear of our national security being at risk to pretend to make it all ok how about the patriot act how about the obama administration's continuous push to make warrants court orders i think the past they don't want them to be necessary when all thora to strap a g.p.s.

device to your vehicle without you knowing it they don't want them to be necessary when they want to obtain your internet records and just to make it a little easier to excuse themselves congress is now trying to force i espied to store your data for up to a year by law so i thought he's can access more and with fewer restrictions were disposed to accept it all because they know better what a dangerous world it really is it's for our own good ole bennett the other hand if you dare speak out if you act out against any of it for example the egregious brutality of the bart police we've heard building to fight for the people security is then going to be stopped in its tracks by whatever means necessary does that seem like a fair deal to you because it definitely doesn't to me now thankfully i'm not the only one noticing this is why we've seen activist groups organizations like wiki leaks make a mark but it's time for this kind of fight for transparency for the freedom to share information and communicate to become mainstream so stop being scared into submission stop thinking that exceptions were made just exceptions stop being

distracted by politicians who want you to focus on our divisions rather than what's actually in our mutual interest and that's our access to technology our ability to communicate which are now intertwined with our rights to speech and assembly so if we don't hold on with the clenched fist they'll be more than happy to take all of that away. ok friday and it's time for happy hours and joining me this evening as our tea. correspondent christine and david cat nice reporter at politico thanks for joining me guys going to be with you. ok our starting story tonight is not what i was going to start with but we're just going to end up starting with it and this is. higher no it's just a really sad state of affairs take

a look at this woman who is an arizona mother who is consuming twenty three twenty thousand calories a day and in attempts to reach her goal of weighing one thousand six hundred pounds . is what i would use and how much normal big meals with the family and the. computer was. i smacked almost constantly. so she's doing this all in order to break the record to be the fattest person in the world i don't even know what to say that's true and she is obviously she's like blogging all of this and putting it online and recording her experiences for people to watch but. somebody stop her this is america i am come out for all shapes and sizes we all need to be represented the same like to see their issue with. two children one of whom says he's worried his mom is going to die he says i'm only twelve years old i don't want my mom to die yet if she was smoking a six packs of cigarettes would you want her to be able to tell you know of course

not but the bigger point i mean i was joking obviously but i think i think the very point here is you know the lengths people will go to get just a little amount of attention this country you know and this woman who's doing this and you know now she's got a blog i mean it's all records and you want to break re-added being the fattest person in the world i was amazed that i was no one would go for yeah because well so many times i've seen people who you know who can't walk and have to have everything brought to them but she was still walking around and stuff really little fifteen minutes of fame remember this is her fifteen ok well let's talk about many people to get a little too much attention and michele bachmann obviously yesterday we dubbed her the gift that just keeps on to give. because he really doesn't it's going to be a fun campaign season with her yesterday she was explaining why she spent a little time working for the i.r.s. take a listen. i

am. really that's why she worked at the i.r.s. because she wanted to know her and i mean i bet if i mean i just kind of don't believe it at that time maybe she just wanted the salary a paycheck maybe but it makes you think why is she want to work in the white house she is always talking about smaller government is that why she wants to come to washington so she can know her enemy so she can take it down to europe who if she's going to be you know the leader of the free world who is really her enemy right are we all her enemies. politically she has to see this she's the tea party queen her entire campaign is based on smaller or no government at all or for the i.r.s. become the tea party queen right but so she she's going to hear way out of it she is going to say this is her best excuse and it's a lame excuse at best that she was i mean she didn't know what she was going to be running for president how many years ago as a tax but it totally contradicts her mrs so she has to give an explanation and this

is her best answer i mean whether people buy that that's for the g.o.p. primary ok so is it is that a creative answer we giving her a parable answer like we can't hear it i have somebody affairs because i love my country so it was working so hard to run a country that is still by far my favorite and you're going to embarrass him it's a great. ok let's keep on with the presidential campaigning there seems to be another little trend within the republican party and that of course is not necessarily believing in science and of course above all questioning evolution take a look at something that rick perry said to a young kid the other day. what. we're hearing now. is that. texas. so i don't know if you heard there at the end saying in texas we teach both creationism and evolution and then we let you decide. and it's not

a that's not that kind of an answer for rick perry in the state of new hampshire in a republican primary this is a southern governor who has very conservative beliefs so i don't really see that as a gaffe he sort of laid it all out there and said you know we let people decide which is not saying i don't believe in evolution i mean i think he's pretty careful there in came out ok because you work on the campaign trail all decide if you were so cynical as sitting here in this studio and you're you're better at monitoring these things and how they're going to be perceived on the campaign trail i mean i have to say when i was in iowa a lot of people talking even though rick perry wasn't even there a lot of people saying they really perceive him as the front runner and he is playing to his base a whole lot of people you know believe that creationism is the right answer i think he was careful i think it's interesting too to see sort of what happened as a result with jon huntsman coming in thing i believe in evolution you know like well we actually have jon huntsman what he tweeted there and shoot i totally didn't

write it down but let's put it out on the screen to be clear i believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming call me crazy and that to me is what really i understand all this playing to your base but it's actually scary to me that he's the crazy one of the bunch because he actually believes in evolution and believe scientists on global warming i mean look the world i mean it has been obvious though at the debate talked about how being in favor of civil unions obviously he is a voice that is not playing you know to the ultra right wing but it's an important voice i think nonetheless he says hold that jon huntsman is trying to be the grown up in the room when you will bachmann screaming you know rick perry saying these thing. he is trying to be the grown up republican the back and win the general election the problem is that is not what the base the people that give money and vote want to hear from their candidates they want to hear the most harsh red meat rhetoric that says we're going to take down obama so that's where you see john how about a two percent love how do we do it you know i do not agree with me here the fact

that people don't want somebody who believes in science to the president of their country i think that's a problem the fact that media organizations are describing john huntsman as the maverick maverick for believing in science that's been confirmed to be at least the last hundred years you can toggle evolution as being like a theory that the all scientists most scientists ninety nine percent except for maybe there are some random people that decide to mix evolution does that mean creationism that they ascribe to and that might be the problem but you might be right that that would be the problem republican party has if they nominate a candidate that is so far outside the mainstream of americans in the general election of matter how bad the economy is they'll go with obama let's really quick just play our last clip here this is something that was overheard being said to rick perry. thank. you. another problem you could say in politics there's just too much money involved here's a guy that goes from bank of america we've got your back we'll help you out i think

this is one of the most scathing examples that rick perry is going to have to deal with moving forward i know it seems crazy but both sides left and right keep saying you don't want somebody in the white house that's too friendly with large corporations and bank of america one of the most corrupt one of the largest corporations and here's evidence well you're going to call me a cynic on the campaign trail but i think this is very innocuous and not a big deal people get to sit here the one that's just like i would say you know when you realize they do more work for someone for a president or a bank or an interest group all of that we're going to help you out i mean there wasn't any promise of money if you read the whole statement the bank says we want to you know we're talking about policy is bank of america going to give to rick perry probably but they give everybody these banks you look at campaign cards you get are going to obama to do so to me that this was i think when you see i think i sorry but no but it's true they get to everybody and if you look at the new super committee republicans and democrats their biggest donors always have been the banks thanks for joining us and thanks for tuning in tonight and make sure to come back

on monday david sirota is coming back on the show and meantime don't forget the fan of the a lot of show on facebook and follow us on twitter if you missed any of the night's show or any and i think you know he's catching you tube dot com slash the a lot of show and it coming up next is adam vs the. song was sixteen years old when he committed these murders that's not the same song so it should not be punished for his crimes song. no rational person in the ninth song. on this will be. honestly. i sours must be executed for the brutal crime committed this is a punishment this is not even. imagined.

since dirt. because he's. been immersed know me whatsoever. how i didn't come here for justice. and heard the first. star of this man. ronald martin. and my thought is now.

thank. you. the. just so. we.

global markets end the week one up by massive sell off as investors panic of a full cost of recession in the u.s. and europe. the middle east is inflamed once again in some mass pulls out of a cease fire after the israeli air force targets gaza. and the anniversary of a crucial turmoil be a failed coup by. communist hardliners in the bloody resistance of democratic activists twenty years ago opened the era of a new post soviet russia our top stories. international news and comment live from moscow this is r.t. with twenty four hours a day in.