body the only surviving locomotive player on the plane rigs and they believe all from a conscious self to the crash insisted on seeing his relatives play still in intensive care was conditions critical but there's also another player who can get on that plane after being told to stay behind by the coach on our web site r.t. dot com you can read all about the full story of mike seem just yet here. but at least but this is a very terrifying to me. it's like a family of i lost if i don't know very few people i was close to for such a long time most of the world. and in the by the russian capital main square the locomotive team was heading on that fateful flight a special commemoration ceremonies being held thousands of fans packed into the stadiums remember those who perished in wednesday's disaster. and we look into the preliminary results from flight recorders of the tragic flight which suggest the engines were intact at the time of the catastrophe we've also got these are coming up now the c.c.t.v.

pictures capturing the very moment the huge ball of smoke rose into the air as the plane burst into flames more analysis more pictures online of course. president barack obama's presented its much anticipated jobs act to congress the ambitious program aims to reverse the country's troubling unemployment statistics it also calls for almost half a trillion dollars in funding and came with a blunt warning to republicans to stop the political circus and pass the measures before the proposal and possible to save let's talk to robert lyman he's a policy director at the just foreign policy think tank thanks for joining us tonight in a recent article you argue did you that bringing u.s. troops home from afghanistan and iraq would do much more jobs than what obama proposed last night take us through it briefly if you could what you're proposing that well i didn't argue that it would do more well i argued. this is means ceding jobs there would cost the government

a giant additional revenue or deficit spending president obama's promise to propose this jobs back it's a question of who are you know it's what you can get through congress and you need . you know hundreds of billion dollars that we can afford that would increase the nation's debt when i was there which would increase the nation's dog question approving the money from the military budget to the domestic budget and every time poured into the research and university of massachusetts using the standard input output model of u.s. economy every time you move the billion dollars from the military budget to the mystic you see. two thousand jobs and. simple estimate the pentagon's plans for afghanistan and iraq the pentagon wants to keep some ten thousand troops in iraq indefinitely. the pentagon wants to keep twenty five

thousand thirty five thousand troops in afghanistan indefinitely after twenty fourteen after foreign congo troops would be withdrawn so based on the current numbers for the cost of keeping u.s. troops in afghanistan in iraq this would cost at least billion dollars if you move if you move just one more said to if you move two hundred billion dollars in the military budget to the domestic budget by withdrawing all u.s. troops. in iraq you would save more than corker thousand jobs talk a i mean i'm sure you think with some stock out there of course the counter-argument to that is isn't it but if the u.s. economy to keep those troops there i mean the u.s. defense budgets absolutely huge well the colony that surrounds it an enormous labor force people package food court logistics transportation even the contract says but the huge economy the those jobs would be lost also do something different thank you for asking that very important point the point is well military spending

creates jobs compared to nothing it's the least efficient. compared to other government spending including tax cuts in the context that we're in now with the united states is that there is a ten year window poor creature who are reducing u.s. government step to the point you control act in the supercommittee it's all about one point two trillion dollars in reducing. over ten years so you see it's like a baseball game or a hockey game you prefer where you reported the score just by talking about one side or the you know money dropping down from or to spend on the military that's not of the table every dollar spent on the military. it is a dollar taken out of us on and so cutting that your theory would avoid domestic and that's why cutting the military will save jobs you see money spent in your

interest in iraq is not being spent in u.s. economy food. all that stuff that's not being produced by american it's not helping u.s. economy compared to spend money and you know i know you're lobbying strongly for your plan let's just assume let's just assume that president obama picture up on your proposal how do you think the republican congress would react to the president saying two hundred billion into the economy to create jobs thinking back the last stimulus which kind of failed no matter how you look at it well again this is all happening in a context and if you look at president obama's proposals he's including a lot of things the republicans are traditionally supported like extending the payroll tax cut that's already there. in the past the question is how is this going to be paid for in the long term in the short term in order to have stimulus that. creates jobs you have to increase the deficit in one term there is an agreement now to reduce the debt over ten years so that's going to have to be

paid for and while some republicans might not like cutting military spending there's other things that most people who can take more like can actually increase that. the president and the congress have to sit at home how they're going to pay for this and maybe the republicans in congress with her ending the wars to other means of paying for it like increasing taxes so this is a very pro-american proposal based on where washington is very rugged knob and policy directly just foreign policy think that both joining us on the program to be with you. but we up in just a few minutes ago a special report for you on an illness that holds soldiers and officers alike even after they leave the battlefield start coming up after a short break in an update of the headlines.

luke.

this is our team from moscow thanks for watching us review our children around the world tonight my name's kevin irwin it's no half past nine pm moscow time top stories address which sparked the u.k.'s national riots is a funeral processions held people are still questioning whether he was a victim of the police brutality. keeping face palestinians rallying for statehood ahead of un vote vowed to stay peaceful in spite of possible israeli attacks saying their recognition rests on their image. moscow is not taking sides of a syria saying that we know peace through bloodshed and calls on both the rebels

and the regime to lay down arms turds of dialogue. present a partner avails is half a trillion dollar jobs act accompanied by stern warnings that has no time left for political bickering. next we explore the deadly legacy of war and the illnesses that can hit servicemen even long after they've come home from the front line. oh that he was of course with. the relationship between the media and the military develops on a technical level where it's not a very important relationship actually there are ways to use the media for example the media can show a selected situation and convey a particular image out of it what is more relevant is how the other levels of misinformation can affect the different media because the media always belong to someone one hind the media there is always a bit

a lot of money and someone that decides to be a. part of the country but that was something new is happening and it was for the development of neurosciences no go sees the new sciences are different to misinformation the or so-called doesn't formats as the soviets used to call it. the neurosciences study the values of social fantasy. that helps gives us a certain meaning rather than another to the same event people seem to be in this context we could experience some alarming scenarios for the freedom systems inside democracies that fit in.

in some of the training courses i held in security and military environments and i talked about a technique that already exists it's called imagining the unimaginable a genetic navy no one has yet been able to imagine the unimaginable swishy. the unimagined has already been conquered capable as far as we can move from a fax and arrive to be unimaginable or even proceed on the other way around still and turn the unimaginable into a fact. hamilton future just think of the use of radio frequency weapons or other non conventional weapons which are hardly imaginable think about all the modifications to the jet stream to alter the high flight air streams and they claim it got it because. unfortunately there are plenty of banned in non conventional weapons again on conventional means that

before the war starts cheap parties enter into an agreement with the opponents the use of weapons with a huge impact on the population on the environment and so on she can appear paradoxical but that's how it is. as an example you can think about the anti landmine campaign because when you go there are some agreements to try to limit the use and the abuse of certain weapons unfortunately when a war starts everybody ignores these agreements things if a war starts the packs have already been broken to see and it will be the international courts responsibility to judge but the main goal of who is involved in a war is to win it by their. i think for. literature to. be in the probability of affecting the territory and the environment negatively is very high it's our main risk critical issue to record.

all of this leave when you bomb something you don't bomb in retail it's something that if you drop the bomb on an oil refinery one weapons factories all around chemical tax rates. well for the record in that circumstance you pollutants are created if you pollutants that electical invisible bullets that invisible bullets are capable of heat in anybody at any moment and can persist in the environment that is so even when a war is over they can pollute that is the bills and the grass is used to feed animals and so even after some time we can still have these filleted tremaine so for inside our bodies for example i gave go on the gift shop for example we have seen agent orange in vietnam what happened there with the defoliants and the other

things the civil war has changed there isn't just the weather that's a whole environment has been altered forever but if there is. a lot of that in mind the borat story and i have a pack of cigarettes martinson rival powder and another bomb in baghdad local iraq and there are found more of pollution residue in the bag even a bit of depleted uranium shit that i'm just a particle but i have found it. that way or the reason is that during and war i think to model cultivation continuous and as the tobacco has a large leaf the face collects all the pollutants. even i can smoke the warres if you even after some time this is why it's a never ending war. but we have got reports that we have today the military and the scientific perspective the opportunity to

use some technologies or discoveries to generate events in order to heavily and almost permanently alter be environment for the whole environment big or small people that. were in. mortal fear that of us are going to i am convinced that we. i don't need to look for anything else because general mimi's experience is more than enough. nevertheless if someone from a broad one some further proof even though many is one of the greats military figures he just needs google which is a search engine accessible to everybody who watches t.v. if you type in the search bar a word whether by two thousand and twenty five separated by blanks do you know what the result is. you come upon a pentagon document hosted by an. m i l website domain. this

extension stands for air force a military documents states that by the year two thousand and twenty five the conquest of the weather is planned that morning the weather literally so the meteorological war is the first of these phenomena the. moment the name is really interesting but it was created in one thousand nine hundred five so it was around the mid ninety's before it's not too recent but what was the purpose of this program initially. it was to see if it was possible locally within the region to modify it to alter the weather conditions to make the airplanes fly on to improve the visibility to be good it was also trying to achieve the complete opposite what it was ability and no chance for the others to fly while we can still operate it when i say us i mean that we belong to that system when someone starts to study the methods to alter the weather

a range of options becomes enormous obviously count these. days when we say that the mild seasons do not exist anymore we get the point because the concept of season is going to disappear altogether. but the reason is because it is possible to interfere with by a lot. processes to changing the climate of. this particular environmental war we've got is one made by altering the climate or the productivity of soil is technically already possible. but we mustn't forget but during the fifty's there were already some rockets that could be launched by farmers to generate tail or rain for sure what i mean is the technology was ready when i was a child still be though in a much reduced scale kind of thing at least. so it's surely possible to overturn

the climate or the structure of the soil and as such change how productive an area is we don't have to imagine tsunamis caused by electromagnetic waves or by undersea explosions. it's a good look at it so i can turn the agricultural areas where there is no state control or there's limited responsiveness into deserts in those areas if you want to eat if you are forced to buy my seeds you. make this up they are not saying that this happened systematically but as the states have lost their surveillance powers while there are supranational structures that don't need states because they already have scientists technologies and even armies. well in

this scenario the dynamics of splenda both are already plausible philippic if you pull secrets. about the environmental war it is a heavy legacy that we have to carry with us it's a good legacy for the ones eager for war but those who like peace surely rejected and look at it like the worst thing that could. possibly happen before all the conventions used to ban such death tools encountered a lot of obstacles. the environmental war of materially affects our daily life and can even alter the cosmic order with. the feeling. of the fall. apart when i talk about a global environmental the more i talk about tools that technically already exist a matter in the hands of people who are willing to use them. for wanting to use these tools as part of the concept of war while these tools exist and can alter the

environment almost permanently it is a global war because the earth is a closed in tropic system a way a modification of the ecosystem in a certain area generates another alteration somewhere else the sea of the life that is why if someone wants to create a tsunami along the open coast he surely realizes that this will affect the earthquake faults from burma to the himalayas. nowadays when we see the sequence of earthquakes and see quakes for instance in china sees one region looking we think of these events on connected but if you look under the seas surface down in the depths of the earth's crust there are lines connecting these points.

for the people familiar with this military piece of hardware the park is considered a sort of totec structure it's a point of reference. there are methods to materially generate rain or to alter weather conditions. these come from important research made in the course of time to improve living conditions. if someone uses the same tools for the opposite purpose be undersized to complete the parchin area there can be unimaginable consequences. for these scientists affirm that cuba's hurricane disasters were caused by haarp. about. haarp is a big entry university project from a scientific perspective but it shouldn't have any link to the military for usage

of these technologies. haarp studies high and low frequency waves of the most recent applications concerns the high frequency that it was born as a scientific project is wrong but there is a small issue with it not for the since the beginning i mean financier of the project is the pentagon that as we used to say in the international intelligence convention if the cia is involved in something stinks. so what is the purpose of horror that its purpose is to research the high frequency waves transmission of it or to see how they affect the rockets and the satellite systems and some natural systems such as the eye on a sphere and stratosphere in order to control the influence caused by these waves coming because. we have to consider that the whole american area is liable to

hurricanes and tornadoes so it's liable to the most extreme weather conditions a little bit of. before you just had to dump some silver nitrate or any other agent from an airplane into a band of tornadoes cold as if you were steering a vehicle assembly that the problem was that these experiments carried out with good. intentions that didn't generate any profit. which is the only industry with enough resources to help the development of these research projects called the war industry and. think about the staggering progress is made by medical science to base hospitals it may appear a paradox like in a cycle the war comes back to the starting point just like it happens in a game of monopoly when you pass go you bring something important on the other hand the price paid was too high so maybe it wasn't necessary. the problem with the

climatic war case is that harper became a reference point that can be unleashed upon someone like an opponent. what really happens inside this fabulous tree is hard to say because it's always the covered with the utmost secrecy. some people claim it depletes the ozone layer because the electrical generators used inside it would be able to affect the ionosphere and cause huge damage that. it isn't easy to simply can damage it is understandable that there are political demonstrations that tend to criminalize certain experiments. it was an american scientist that accused the russians of permanent climatic modifications in the central states of the us many of them. just so there is an experience that suggests something to us if the americans assign to the russians

a terrible power that means they already have it or close to achieving it. so that as the ongoing climate changes worry us we are inclined to assign it something of great importance. i consider this as the big door that could lead in any sort of the. influence or ideology i would call it terror because it sounds to terrorism closer to the word fear. we are moving towards a world that will be progressively more afraid. of. weapon .

if we consider weapons everything that can produce fear we cannot automatically inserted in that list. the emotional impact caused by a sky marked by these on no one is increased by the fact that they can be interpreted in a lot of different ways. as all the hypotheses made until now are valid. concerning chemical trails i'll tell the truth. i try to study this phenomenon in depth. now i'll say something that could alter someone else or she was. a loner i used to think it was a swindle to. better in effect if up at the pictures we can

find online are really dreadful because the trails intersect regularly. will look. good for. what is sure is that it's not a mysterious phenomenon like some people may think these trails are produced by the airplanes especially the military ones and in the course of time they have changed their appearance. that's why i've said this phenomenon is real and it strongly concerns the citizens therefore the citizens need to be informed who has to do that for the government to the appropriate ministers both the environment and the defense. on this if it was such a trivial issue it wouldn't have been raised throughout the world. for instance i know that in the us the government made an investigation concerning the subject in there the conclusions weren't exhaustive either. probably there is something related to military activity that i think isn't shocking the real problem is that

when there are experiments and phenomenon of this type the government of the country is the first to be aware of them. in any case the citizens should be reassured by saying they are experiments or whatever they are but they are not a concern for the health of the citizens. so i cannot say the difference between the ones caused by the condensation and the ones left out there on purpose. i can't speak of the ones left there on purpose or what the purpose is i mean why are they left their big watch out. because i get. the most worrying thing for me is the fact that we didn't receive convincing answers. he'll basic a book about us because in his will stephen i think that often exhaustive answers are not given because the knowledge of these phenomena is very limited.

companies are more to give you a look at this situation increases the number of suspects but also when i understand the authorities approach much more not to give any explanation rather than totally tonight my they got that i think about the u.f.o.'s they have never been categorically denied by anyone roger got if ever there was a huge fraud but can be used at a macroscopic level it is u.f.o.'s. the chaos or the told why isn't there appropriate research financed by a corporation or company let's do serious research.