extension or revaluation or reformulation of things we've done often successfully in the past so there's nothing super bowls are unique about this it doesn't break the mold it doesn't think outside the box and it doesn't propose anything five standard deviations from the norm economically it should be fairly easy to do it we should be debating whether or not it's big enough whether or not it's targeted in the right places and whether or not it might be another daily and another dollar short politically it may not be possible but that has something to do with the fact that we do have one of the two major parties more or less beholden to a strategy that the democrats form something a little bit like a cult of personality around president obama and the republicans have built a strategy that they feel is working for them and some of the polls suggest they might be right of a sort of anti cult of personality or a cult of personality and that gives our polity this strange dysfunctional format it's been following within which it's almost a world upside down to borrow

a phrase from eduardo galliano a much more poetic speaker on such subjects than myself and so i don't really know how you'd characterize it yes certainly it will be interesting and i think a lot of all eyes will be on sort of how this plays out especially in the come the coming days the politics of it all but i want to talk about some of the specifics here i mean next to what extent do you think that regulations could slow down some of these projects president obama laid out a lot of projects and it seems this day and age every project needs you know an environmental impact study surveys i think it was george well he said the other day you know you couldn't build the hoover dam today because they discover a snail darter in the colorado river and the e.p.a. would stop it you know and let's compare for a second the plans that we have here in the u.s. to china people you know people would be displaced animals would be killed and trees would be cut down but whatever it is that needed to be built in china most likely would get violent so i'm wondering what you think you know if we want to get

these dogs going will there need to be a drastic change in some of these regulations. sure i mean often it feels like i think it could be a low over done it often feels like the one thing that everyone can agree on and united states right left and center is to stand in the way of a good project that we obviously need on the other hand we are capable of getting things done we want to get them done even if they do a lot more than damage some snail habitats etc we are fighting multiple wars with real human casualties every day we do it live with fifteen million unemployed people twenty five million on him under employed people we live with a situation of one in eight of our people one in five or six in many disturbed populations economically disturbed populations on food stamps we live with a new literacy rate that is not the envy of the first world and we live with a high school dropout rate in many parts of the country that it's heard of in the developed world so i think we should be a little careful about saying we're

a shangri-la of political correctness when we want something and we need something and enough people get behind it we can get it done and i'd be the first to admit your question has a real basis you know unfortunately it's a good question and that is we have been alarmingly and shockingly poor at moving mountains when it comes to the structural changes our economy or our economic misadventure absolutely screams out for our i let me ask you this you know if you were a betting person let's advise investment i mean ten years ago people who invested in armored humvees and made some good money with all the wars that we got involved in so what do you say i mean if you listen to president obama's speech do you take it as a cue to invest in construction equipment. oh destruction equipment business has done pretty well on the rest of the world including caterpillar and large american construction businesses maybe not so much recently where the markets are in a massive turmoil i think we may have reached an unusual interesting point where we've gone as far as we can with the price of companies going up without macro

economies being a lot stronger than they have been so probably to keep asset prices even investment speculative asset prices up going forward we need to see some economic recovery there are those asset classes that people historically associate with doing well in bad times they're sometimes called the vice plays things like tobacco and alcohol and porn shocks and that kind of thing and there certainly is more than a little bit of evidence that as people lose confidence in various developed country governments gold is a place that a lot of people are comfortable hiding out that being said the real investment we need is to invest in our collective future with a functioning economy that has inclusive growth and wages on which people can hold their head up have some dignity support themselves support their family and invest in the dreams that they need as individuals and we need as a society all right make sure a lot of come true right now spread wealth economist with the new school in our new york studios thanks so much well the face of freedom in libya not overly

recognizable to so many who live there and fear for their lives and their safety on a daily basis now i'm sure you've seen it lots of celebrations around some parts of the country but despite that fighting between libyan rebels and progress off the forces continues in other parts of the country now with the deadline for gadhafi to surrender just hours away r.t. correspondent maria for notion is on the ground there and shows us that in the wake of revolution there is more fear confusion and ironies. the. a city sort of rates for more than ten days the even capital has been rejoicing in the dictator's fall where the. he wanted to meet his orchard here in the central square players who for the second anniversary we put our flag instead we were so happy without him. that it seems in the last two weeks rebel fighters have fired. the shot during this whole entry point early august

oh maybe a fifteen hour it's very variable with. mr gaddafi. duffy's. he told the people love me with the people love me no you see the very. right of freedom is only going to get that good and were then all right with that ok but away from jubilant crowds we were not so pleased at the hollies in tripoli is slim district historically pro khadafi by the rebels arrived his sister was badly injured she's still in hospital in tunisia other one doesn't want to show his face on camera and seized on a hidden location for the interview he says revolution has brought much fear and its wake. there is no peace there is no safety in the city we don't let our

children outside when it's dark we are afraid we always wait for something bad when gadhafi was here at least we didn't have to sleep a wink but you know. the rahman says he also wanted change and a brighter future for his country but not base way i like gene and people are dying on both sides of the cities destroyed and no one cares do they seriously think that it changed it for the better yourself just look around is that what you wanted. and what is around is a scene of right spread destruction and social chaos of badly damaged buildings matched by the rising stink of garbage and decomposing bodies junctures roam the streets barely old enough to understand that what they carry are weapons not toys many shops schools and hospitals are closed while the city's symmetries are growing bigger and bigger. shortly after tripoli fell into rebel hands the national

transitional council it is new authority claimed it was moving here from benghazi it weeks have passed and there is still no sign of its presence on the ground or order being restored the city is functioning by itself and treading a fine line between freedom and anneke. r t tripoli libya and that is going to do it for now but for more on the stories we covered go to r.t. dot com slash usa or you tube got home flash r.t. america i'm christine for sound. if. he is easy he.

says. download the official location and show i phone the i pod touch from the i choose our. life on the go. video on demand copies of mine. and r.s.s. feeds now in the palm of your. question on the hot seat all calm.

i've. i've. a bold move for me here the relationship between the media and the military develops on a technical level where it's not a very important relationship actually there are ways to use the media for example the media can show a selected situation to convey a particular image out of it what is more relevant is how the other levels of misinformation can affect the different media because the media always belong to

someone and the media there is always a bit a lot of money and someone that decides he. could come up with something new is happening and it was a development of neurosciences no go sees the new sciences are different to misinformation for your so called doesn't format see it as the soviets used to call it. the neurosciences study the values of social fantasy. that helps gives us a certain meaning rather than another to the same event it will seem to be in this context we could experience some alarming scenarios for the freedom systems inside democracies and fit in.

in some of the training courses i held in security and military environments and i talked about a technique that already exists but now it's called imagining the unimaginable a genetic navy no one has yet been able to imagine the unimaginable from a ship. the unimagined has already been conquered problems for we can move from a fax and arrive to the unimaginable or even proceed on the other way around and turn the unimaginable into a fact i am a preacher just think of the use of radio frequency weapons or other non conventional weapons which are hardly imagine a bull think about all the modifications to the jet stream to alter the high flight air streams and the climate's get it.

unfortunately there are plenty of banned and non conventional weapons again on conventional means that before the war starts should carlie's enter into an agreement with the opponents or tolstoy the use of weapons with a huge impact on the population on the environment and so on the show can appear paradoxical but that's how it is. up to the top but as an example you can think about the anti landmine campaign because when you do there are some agreements to try to limit the use and the abuse of certain weapons unfortunately when a war starts where everybody ignores these agreements if a war starts attacks have already been broken still it will be the international courts responsibility to judge but the main goal pool was involved in a war as to when it bought it. i think so. listeners it was the in the probability

of affecting the territory and the environment negatively is very high and it's our main risk to go mostly because. all of this lead when you bomb something you don't bomb in retail. that you drop the bomb on an oil refinery factories on chemical tax rates. course for the courts in that circumstance you pollutants are created if you feel it is that electical invisible bullets that invisible bullets are capable of heat in any body at any moment and can persist in the environment that is so even when a war is over they conclude that the bills and it grows species to feed animals so even after some time looking still have these ability to remain so for inside our bodies for example our dreams go on as. we have seen agent orange in vietnam

what happened there with the foley and the other things is that with what has changed there isn't just the weather the whole environment has been altered forever captive. for a lot of that in mind the borat area i had a pack of cigarettes molten sunrise on our drum and another bomb in baghdad broke over iraq and there are found more of pollution residue even if we took depleted uranium shipped from just a particle but i have found it. by way of the reason is that during a war i think tobacco cultivation containing its and as a tobacco has a large leaf collects all the pollutants. even i can smoke them or residue you even after some time this is why it's a never ending war. in. the way of the outlet.

we have today for the military and a scientific perspective the opportunity to use some technologies or discoveries to generate events in order to heavily and almost permanently alter the environment for the whole environment or so will feel that. the world in. most of us have got it i am convinced that we. i don't need to look for anything else because general needs experience is more than enough. nevertheless if someone from abroad one some further proof even though many as one of the greats military figures he just needs google which is a search engine accessible to everybody if you type in the search bar the word whether by two thousand and twenty five separated by blanks you know what the result is. you come upon a pentagon document hosted by an. m i l website to me and see this

extension stands for air force and military documents states that by the year two thousand and twenty five the conquest of the weather is planned this morning the weather literally or so the meteorological war is the first of these phenomena are going to. go before the name is really interesting but it was created in one thousand nine hundred five so it was around the mid ninety's before it's not too recent but what was the purpose of this program initially. it was to see if it was possible locally within a region to modify it to alter the weather conditions to make the airplanes fly to improve the visibility a good bit it was also trying to achieve the complete opposite by scarce visibility and no chance for the others to fly while we can still operate and i say us i mean that we belong to that system it's just that when someone starts to study the

methods to alter the weather a range of options becomes enormous obviously out of the case. when we say that a mild seasons do not exist anymore we get the point because the concept of season is going to disappear altogether. the reason is because it is possible to interfere with by a large. processes to changing the climate but i. think this particular environmental war we've got is one made by altering the climate or the productivity of soil is technically already possible. but we mustn't forget that during the fifty's there were already some rockets that could be launched by farmers to generate hail or rain for sure what i mean is the technology was ready when i was a child to go on

a much reduced scale at least. so it's surely possible to overturn the climates or the structure of the soil and as such change high production area is we don't have to imagine tsunamis caused by electromagnetic waves or by undersea explosions . to say that it will get it so i can turn the agricultural areas where there is no state control or there's limited responsiveness into desert in those areas if you want to eat if you are forced to buy my seeds. make me something i am not saying this happened systematically but as the states have lost their surveillance powers while there are super national structures that don't need states because they

already have scientists technologies and even armies. well in this scenario the dynamics of splenda both are already plausible with that thank you for secrets. about the environmental war it is a heavy legacy that we have to carry with us it's a good legacy for the ones eager for war and for those who like peace surely rejected and look at it like the worst thing that compete. they happen before all the conventions used to ban such death tools encounters a lot of obstacles. the environmental war materially affects our daily life and can even alter the cosmic order. when i talk about a global environmental the war i talk about tools that technically already exist a matter in the hands of people who are willing to use them. for wanting to use

these tools is part of the concept of war. exist and can alter the environment almost permanently it is a global war because the earth is a closed in tropic system we'll go away a modification of the ecosystem in a certain area generates another alteration somewhere else to see if that is why if someone wants to create a tsunami along the open coast we surely realizes that this will affect the earthquake faults from burma to the himalayas. nowadays when we see the sequence of earthquakes and see quakes for instance in china seas one region ok we think of these events unconnected. to look under the sea surface in the depths of the earth's crust but if there are lines connecting these points.

for the people familiar with this military piece of hardware is considered a sort of top ten extract sure it's a point of reference. there are methods to materially generate rayon or to alter weather conditions. these come from important research made in the course of time to improve living conditions. i mean if someone uses the same tools for the opposite purpose and decides to complete the parchin area it can be unimaginable consequences. for the scientists affirm that cuba's hurricane disasters were caused by horrible. haarp is a big entry university project from

a scientific perspective of the red shouldn't have any link to the military for usage of these technologies. studies high and low frequency waves budget of the most recent applications concerns the high frequency. it was born as a scientific project but there is a small issue with it with the since the beginning i mean financier of the project is the pentagon that as we used to say in the international intelligence convention if the cia is involved in something stinks. so what is the purpose of haarp. its purpose is to research the high frequency waves transmission to see how they affect the rockets and the satellite systems and some natural systems such as the eye on a skier and stratosphere in order to control the influence caused by these waves because. we have to consider that the whole american area is liable to

hurricanes and tornadoes so it's liable to the most extreme weather conditions. if it were. before you just had to dump some silver nitrate or any other agent from an airplane into a band of tornadoes cone as if you were steering a vehicle obviously that the problem was that these experiments carried out with good. attentions didn't generate any profit. which is the only industry with enough resources to help the development of these research projects called the war industry when i. think about the staggering progress is made by medical science to base hospitals it may appear a paradox but like in a cycle the war comes back to the starting point of little fockers just like it happens in a game of monopoly when you pass go you bring something important on the other hand

the price paid was too high so maybe it wasn't necessary. the problem with the climatic war case is that haarp became a reference point that can be unleashed upon someone like an opponent. what really happens inside this fabulous laborde tree is hard to say because it's always the covered with the utmost secrecy. some people claim it to pleats the ozone layer because the electrical generators used inside it would be able to affect the ionosphere and cause huge damage but. it isn't easy to simply condemn it it is understandable that there are political demonstrations that tend to criminalize certain experiments. that. it was an american scientist that accused the russians of permanents climatic modifications in the central states of the us money up there for. just about there is an experience that

suggests something to us if the americans assigned to the russians a terrible power means they already have it close to achieving it. as the ongoing climate changes worry us we are inclined to assign it something of great importance. if. i consider this as the big door that could lead in any sort of in. ideology i would call it terror because it sounds to terrorism. closer to the word fear because we are moving towards a world that will be progressively more afraid. as fear a weapon. if

we consider weapons everything that can produce fear we cannot automatically inserted in that list. the emotional impact caused by a sky marked by these unknown trails is increased by the fact that they can be interpreted in a lot of different ways. as all the hypotheses made until now are valid. concerning chemical trails i'll tell the truth. try to study this phenomenon in depth. now i'll say something that could ball or someone else or she's got a book or a low i used to think it was a swindle too. there are in effect

a different look at the pictures we can find online are really dreadful because the trails intersect regulatory. will look. pretty good. from what is sure is that it's not a mysterious phenomenon like some people may think these trails are produced by the airplanes of the especially the military ones and in the course of time they have changed their appearance. that's why i've said this phenomenon is real and it strongly concerns the citizens therefore the citizens need to be informed who has to do that the government through the appropriate ministers both the environment and the defense. on this if it was such a trivial issue it wouldn't have been raised throughout the world. for instance i know that in the us the government made an investigation concerning the subject in there the conclusions were an exhaustive either. probably there is something

related to military activity that i think isn't shocking the real problem is that when there are experiments and phenomenon of this type the government of the country is the first to be aware of the sort of phenomena in any case the citizens should be reassured by saying they are experiments or whatever they are or they are not a concern for the health of the citizens. here know so i cannot say the difference between the ones caused by the condensation and the ones left up there on purpose so they are called speak on the ones left there on purpose or what the purpose is i mean why are they left their big watch out. because of. the most worrying thing for me is the fact that we didn't receive convincing answers. will basically what they want us because it is all stated i think that often exhaustive answers are not given because.