cancerian fears whining with police and the city. coming up next we'll look into the deadly legacy a war and how it can hit military personnel even long after they returned home safe for our special report right here on alt.

has changed. has changed both in a practical and in a motivational sense. than anything else the impulses for change. is one of the most difficult concepts to do today more than. still classifies using time. from one thousand fifteen thousand one hundred eighteen from one thousand four hundred forty five. and people have ignored it when it started. but i think the real problem is that it is not even if it is going to come to an. absolute future will be one with those soldiers the troops will still exist but it will be an invisible.

the war has evolved substantially in terms. the war has been. on the mainland and in the sea. the first gap in the war evolution can be compared to a few. evolution of the upright position. the upright position in the evolution. of the conflict when the airplane became a weapon it starts to become possible to materially turn the. day that people have to go to war. like a football match in a stadium. the people play football in the streets. we don't need to wait for. someone to get close to a car to start opening fire. we just need someone clicking with the mouse able to give the first of the impulse.

until the end of the whole chain. we just have to think of the energy supply. communications and the transport system. in a while it will be possible to apply. the terrorist attack. of the terrorist attack to the purpose. deeply into it.

to see them and to catch them to us. the same as a toaster. eight hundred casualties at present i think that there are around seventy thousand workers on the health. affected by cancer just in the municipality of manhattan. additionally you have over one hundred fifty thousand citizens affected by different illness sense is a never ending. leukemia lymphoma and the sickness is. i hope that the person that calls that spirit will realize the.

skyscraper's. explosion of two airplanes. case with the main. and the dust generated from these explosions. the facts of the original explosion. they generated. and new york citizens are still suffering because of it. when the first plane hit the first twin tower i was in a military environment in a high command place. as a matter of fact the first attack immediately followed by the second one being seen as the beginning of world war three.

it was something like a vent of fear. fear that found in the form of a stereotype. three. if it ever happens. world war three will probably not be a clash between two armies. to take. ologies. perhaps world war three has already begun and we didn't even notice it because it's not a traditional war on the battleground. of the we'll let's start by saying that by my reckoning this is the fourth war not the third like we already had a third conflict and we call it the cold war. in my opinion the fourth world war is already in progress but it isn't fought with the aid of weapons it is a mistake to fight using weapons if you always loose all the participants loose. am especially now we have such powerful weapons that could be dragged into

a foolish war with hundreds of thousands of casualties this is the main risk we are playing we are assuming enormous risks and we aren't even aware of it is it a big. bad. nuclear weapons have surely marked a strong revolution in both military and security affairs in the mideast that before their creation had always been a shortage of firepower in relation to the wishes of strategic. nuclear weapons provided firepower greater than any political purpose rationally prosecutable. therefore nuclear weapons specially during the cold war be known war weapons. what is happening now adays is the normality there is no order a great change with a continuous redefinition of the international order that can lead to unexpected

results have a redefinition of new roles and a change where we ignore what is useful what is useless and what is harmful to new subjects are emerging almost every day and it is unknown if these subjects will be good or evil. just. you just have to think about the international finance and so yesterday we thought that that would have been the universal solution to all the problems you are as now it has become one of the enemies to fight against. cancer. what has changed in the war concept is not just its definition or its idea the war changed in the way it is fault in its motivations more than anything else what

changed is the. affair between sovereign states though the nowadays it is not a war or a confrontation between sovereign states anymore period is a confrontation between wills between different interests. not just between organizations but also between organizations. look at. what has modified the concept of war from the traditional one to a current one is the fall of the agreement established during the westphalia treaty by the treaty implied that wars are an affair between states when a country was defeated on the battlefield except in the political defeat and turned into an ally of the winner but nowadays the war is not an affair between states anymore because it became more expensive and the profits had reduced. to

a present it depends on the relative productiveness of the different economies that in other terms on the competitiveness of the different countries take in a system. in an era where the states lose power we see on the other hand the growth of the corporations it is easy to think about the american corporations because they are the most powerful ones but we could also talk about the swiss ones that aren't under the spotlight as much as the americans but they still exist they are strong and can determine the future of the whole world. states. aren't subject.

states. states. of connection between the economic and the political power. of the people. state. the state. services. services. citizens. are intended for the people economic power. in this particular historical context. is the power.

is the interests is the. subject. is not the state. is the state. with the state. we aren't talking about the. people from. states here we are talking about corporations that can influence several states to have states have their disposal.

and we have to think that we just experienced a case that can be key to understanding what a corporation is and what a state is that if it is true that the head of the italian military secret service is. under the control of an italian corporation it while i'm not going to mention the name of this corporation but it is easy to figure out. and this is symbolic of the loss of the importance of the state. status of the state has changed since it lost almost all its. because into the void is always filled by something that is why the corporations are progressively taking the place of the state. in american comic books and movies the theme of a world led by the corporations is nothing new. as the state is going to withdraw even in that which concerns military and intelligence affairs the corporations will

be progressively more capable of producing events which events that could result in a war after all and the last wars fought in the middle east the importance of troops back in the day would have been called mercenaries and at present are called contractors is evident. but where nowadays the war really has an asymmetrical dimension what i mean is that war is not a clash between two different armies. more a clash between two different will to a certain idea or to deny something from the. assertion and denial are nowadays the inputs for the war. they may experience. interruptions to a large extent they carry on being the same war. so nowadays there are three different approaches to war three different types of war

which firstly there is the classic war with an open frontal clash between two armies and so on. secondly there is the stabilisation in destabilization war between countries with one of the opponents attempting to stabilize a country or an area and the other one doing the opposite of destabilizing. and the third is the concept of war against terrorism a concept introduced in the last few years by the us government and then brought a classic war scenario such as the iraq invasion which is the proof of the intimate connections between these three different types of war backlash. in the fight against terrorism the relation between the attacker and the defender is neither equal nor cimatron. it is unclear who is attacking and who is defending all the boundaries ethical spatial temporal and technological have vanished.

now adays an opponent using archaic tools like the taliban in afghanistan seriously harm super advanced forces and this is really happening now to us british and even italian troops in that scenario. or weakness in the fight against terrorism consists of the fact that the terrorists especially the suicide bombers are ready to die while we aren't due to this fact we already started in a losing position. let's take a person that is not afraid of dying. another one that maybe is part of a voluntary military service because he needs a better wage the person that went back home is surrounded by comforts and another

one that isn't scared of dying because he doesn't have anything to lose again a person with a strong ideology and another one considering the battle as an ordinary job. in the physical clash begins one of them will surely experience more troubles the sequel. will. not only different motivations different technologies different tools but also a different idea of what the war is to make this phenomenon of the war phenomena to be highly balanced and balanced not in favor of the stronger side but in favor of who has less to lose. because let me keep.

does not need to exist we are using these terms in a negative way in forcing the al qaeda ideology. it gives us the us products of death products under the al-qaeda brand it works exactly like a super market an agency or any other economic entity that wants to be recognized under that particular brand. what causes the real damage is not the terrorism itself the real damage comes from us from our fear of terrorism. if you look into the terrorist attacks that we. experienced this may sound incredible but the number of casualties that appeared so great to us is still well below the casualties caused by car accidents during a normal weekend for example. nevertheless the real strong impact comes from

people's reaction to terrorism the economic damage the obstacles to our a possibility of freely traveling and so on. everything that affects our daily life is damage that we create ourselves it doesn't come from terrorism. we are more afraid of the things we are told rather than of the real happening. find out that the most important war is the one made for the media. now a days it's not information warfare limited exclusively to some professionals. information warfare is fought by everyone it's this warfare around the year two thousand

lebanese israelis used. the israelis couldn't stand the images broadcast by hezbollah's website and so they decided to shut it down and have been able to rescue those who were calling for help the hezbollah decided to repay this with a denial of service attack their servers completely. at that point we discovered that the hezbollah have the same capabilities as the israelis they can attack the television. they can hit the knesset or the bank of israel in a war that could be never ending. how could one of the principles that are important is to always keep in mind that when we talk about communication the first one to arrive has a a huge. vantage. if you give an announcement and this announcement isn't immediately followed by some kind of counter information to the people accept some ideas and afterwards it is really hard to

change them. to. you and i create in the event and with this event i modify reality it is true times past the states always followed this principle by murdering a political opponent using a hired killer a well known story. cases they provoked a riot or encourage terrorism in a certain area but now a days this event theory has been imported into the civilian sphere from the political and the military wants. communication companies which employed marketing. today there are too many communication tools to figure out what is truly happening in reality it is progressively more difficult to realize what is really going on.

is becoming more relevant for two reasons it became global and most of all it is in real time. as in the democracies reaches the audience in real time and so the t.v. audience anticipates the governments because the governments need to follow along. to know the news. in terms of strategy and politics provokes a more direct influence of the public opinion in the management of the conflicts he compared to the past. along with the representation of the war there are changes about the concept of war

in the audience at this stage we do not talk about people anymore we talk about the audience in this context it is normal to raise adults about the possible manipulation which can be either intended or not it can be intended when for instance a scene is shot on purpose in order to influence the audience's ideas but it can also be an willed for some reason a fact is selected on the news and for everybody it becomes the expression of everything happening in a certain context who looks back at the facts no one does that first of all we cannot broadcast a fact. representation. before communications were closely tied to human relationships there were many more forms of defense she said there was less space for fabrication. as social control fates information is being turned into something different from reality something in between reality and imagination

this is what information is virtual pending world. to invent a piece of news diffuse it on the web massively no one can know whether that piece of news really is on the websites because the websites use it or because someone puts it there. so our enemy is the news. the power of the real weapon is the news and the influence that it can. be shot in the back with information in certain situations this is one of the biggest issues. the new weapon is information and the war is in progress. five percent of the broadcast of information comes from the same subjects that are also. information just think of the press agencies they give us information about their employers the companies they work for. justice we have to consider but t.v.

news papers are not stakeholders are not the audience nor the consumers are. the ones deciding the political approach of media are the advertisers but if a piece of news does not have to be spread the subject involves a whole page of a newspaper and that piece of news disappears. there is another thing the possibilities of misinformation increase enormously the audio visual media is a juxtaposition of very short spurts one minute. thirty seconds and so on. your. smart effect. is to lead the perception of the audience then get a political reaction out of them. worldwide

manhunt for him love stood for fifteen year. one million year old war and was

promised for a. political smirk for the one. materials from an engine. general of the service. archie. soon which brightened a few new songs from some stupid. stunts on t.v. dot com. the commercial get a lot of that on its hokey stadium becomes a place of the morning with a hundred thousand including prime minister vladimir putin paid tribute to the

forty three victims of wednesday's plane crash which claimed the lives of most of the team and he stopped. a nation gone to new security threats emerge on the eve of the tenth anniversary of the nine eleven attacks which unleashed the war on terror and now feared by some to have been uneven and because threat to the world. in truckee relations between israel and egypt but rather strained this protest the story today israeli embassy in cairo but the ambassador and almost all his staff forced to me. and a very warm welcome from all of us here in moscow this is as he was me you know thanks for joining it's the home arena for jaroslaw.