clash during fierce fighting the only sense. as the lines coming up next the second part of our special report about the deadly legacy of war and how it can come come back to haunt military personnel it will long after they've returned home. a relationship between the media and the military develops on a technical level where it's not a very important relationship but actually there are ways to use the media for example the media can show a selected situation to convey a particular image out of it what is more relevant is how the other levels of misinformation can affect the different media because the media always belong to someone and the media there is always a bit a lot of money and someone that decides he's.

going to talk of something new is happening with the development of neurosciences the new sciences are different to misinformation feel or so-called desert as the soviets used to call it. the neurosciences study the values of social fantasy if you did that helps gives us a certain meaning rather than another to the same event it will seem to be in this context we could experience some alarming scenarios for the freedom systems inside democracies.

in some of the training courses i held in security and military environments and i talked about a technique that already exists it's called imagining the unimaginable genetic navy no one has yet been able to imagine the unimaginable. unimagined has already been conquered problems for we can move from the facts and arrive to the unimaginable or even proceed on the other way around and turn the unimaginable into a fact by how much just think of the use of radio frequency weapons or other non conventional weapons which are hardly imaginable think about all the modifications to the jet stream to alter the high flight air streams and the climate. unfortunately there are plenty of banned and non conventional weapons again on conventional means that before the war starts parties enter into an agreement with the opponents are told void the use of weapons with

a huge impact on the population on the environment and so on so it can appear paradoxical but that's how it is. but as an example you can think about the anti landmine campaign because when you get there are some agreements to try to limit the use and the abuse of certain weapons unfortunately when a war starts everybody ignores these agreements things if a war starts the packs have already been broken to see and it will be the international responsibility to judge but the main goal of who is involved in a war is to win it. i. really appreciate it but. in the probability of affecting the territory and the environment negatively is very high it's our main risk to go much further.

when you bomb something you don't bomb in retail. you drop the bomb on an oil refinery one weapons factories all run chemical factories. in that circumstance new pollutants are created pollutants that i like to call invisible bullets that invisible bullets are capable of anybody at any moment and can persist in the environment that is so even when a war is over they can pollute the bills and the grass is used to feed animals so even after some time looking is to have peace military man so from war inside bodies to god james go on and. yell that we have seen agent orange in vietnam what happened there with the defoliants and the other things you see what has changed there isn't just the weather whole environment has been altered forever.

there are a lot of that in my the borat area i have a pack of cigarettes bolton. and another one in baghdad photos are out and there are found more of pollution residue and even a bit of depleted uranium but i'm just a particle but i have found it. that rare of the reason is that during the war. and as the tobacco has a large leak like collects all the pollutants. i can smoke through warres it even after some time this is why it's a never ending war. we have today from a military and a scientific perspective the opportunity to use some technologies or discoveries to generate events in order to heavily and almost permanently alter b.

environment the whole environment of. the world. i am convinced that we. need to look for anything else because general experience is more than enough. nevertheless if someone from abroad one some further proof even though many is one of the greats military figures just needs google which is a search engine accessible to everybody if you type in the search bar. by two thousand and twenty five separated by blanks do you know what the result is. you come upon a pentagon document. website. this extension stands for air force and military documents states that by the year two thousand and twenty five the conquest of the weather is. holding the weather

literally so the meteorological war is the first of. the name is really interesting but it was created in one thousand nine hundred five so it was around the mid ninety's it's not too recent but what was the purpose of this program initially. it was to see if it was possible locally within the region to modify the weather conditions to make the airplanes fly the visibility it was also trying to achieve the complete. visibility and no chance for the others to fly. when i say us i mean that we belong to that system when someone starts to study the methods to alter the weather a range of options becomes enormous obviously the case.

when we say that the mild seasons do not exist anymore we get the point because the concept of season is going to disappear altogether. the reason is because it is possible to interfere with by a lot. as to changing the climate. of this particular environmental war that is one made by altering the climate or the productivity of soil is technically already possible. but we mustn't forget that during the fifty's there were already some rockets that could be launched by farmers to generate hail or rain yeah what i mean is that technology was ready when i was a child to go on a much reduced scale at least. so it's surely possible to overturn the climates or the structure of the soil and as such change to an area is we don't have to

imagine tsunamis caused by electromagnetic waves or by undersea explosions. i can turn the agricultural areas where there is no state control or there's limited responsiveness into deserts in those areas if you want to eat if you are forced to buy my seeds you know. they could be something i am not saying but this happened systematically as the states have lost their surveillance powers or supernational structures that don't need states because they already have scientists technologies and even armies. well in this scenario the dynamics of splenda are already plausible.

the environmental war is a heavy legacy that we have to carry with us it's a good legacy for the ones eager for war but those who like peace surely rejected and look at it like the worst thing that could. possibly happen before all the conventions used to ban such death tools encountered a lot of obstacles. the environmental war material effects our daily life and even the cosmic order. when i talk about a global environmental or i talk about tools that technically already exist in the hands of people who are willing to use them how to use these tools is part of the concept of war. exist and can alter the environment almost permanently it is a global war because the earth is a closed system away

a modification of the ecosystem in a certain area generates another alteration somewhere else. that is why if someone wants to create a tsunami along the coast realizes that this will affect the earthquake faults from burma to the himalayas. when we see this sequence of earthquakes and see quakes for instance in china sea region we think that these events unconnected. to look under the sea surface in the depths of the earth's crust there are lines connecting these points. with the people familiar with this military piece of hardware is considered a sort of totemic structure it's a point of reference. there are methods to

materially generate or to alter weather conditions. these come from important research made in the course of time to improve living conditions. if someone uses the same tools for the purpose. to complete the parchin area. unimaginable consequences. these scientists affirm that cuba's hurricane. were caused by haarp. big into university project from a scientific perspective shouldn't have any link to the military or usage of these technologies. studies high and low frequency waves but. the most

recent application concerns the high frequency. it was born as a scientific project but there is a small issue with it. since the beginning. of the project is the pentagon. as we used to say in the international intelligence convention. volved something stinks. is the purpose of harp. its purpose is to research the high frequency waves transmission to see how they affect the rockets and the satellite systems and some natural systems such as the. stratosphere in order to control the influence caused by these waves. we have to consider that the whole area is liable to hurricanes and tornadoes so it's liable to the most extreme weather conditions.

before you just had to dump some silver nitrate or any other agent from an airplane . as if you were steering a vehicle. experiments carried out with good. tension's didn't generate any profit. which is the only industry with enough resources to help the development of these research projects the war industry. think about the staggering progress is made by medical science to base hospitals it may appear a paradox but you know like in a cycle the war comes back to the starting point just like it happens in a game of monopoly when you pass go bring something important on the other hand the price paid was too high so maybe it wasn't necessary. the problem with the climatic war case is that harper became a reference point that can be unleashed upon someone like an opponent. really

happens inside this fabulous laboratory is hard to say because it's always the covered with the utmost secrecy. some people claim it depletes the ozone layer because the electrical generators used inside it would be able to affect the. huge damage but it isn't easy to simply condemn it it is understandable but there are political demonstrations that tend to criminalize certain experiments. it was an american scientist that accused the russians of permanent climatic modifications in the central states of the us. just out there is an experience that suggests something to us if the americans assigned to the russians a terrible power means they already have it close to achieving it.

the ongoing climate changes worry us we are inclined to assign it something of great importance. if. i could lead in any sort of the. call it terror because it sounds to terrorism. are moving towards a world that will be more afraid. if we consider weapons. we can automatically. list.

the emotional impact. is increased by the fact that they can be interpreted in a lot of different ways. are valid. chemical trails tell the truth. try to study this phenomenon. now i'll say something that could be someone else or she was. i used to think it was a swindle to know. better in effect if i look at the pictures we can find online are really dreadful because the trails intersect regular.

when looking. for. what is sure is that it's not a mysterious phenomenon like some people may think these trails are produced by the airplanes especially the military ones and in the course of time they have changed their appearance. that's why i've said this phenomenon is real and it strongly concerns the citizens therefore the citizens need to be informed who has to do that the government through the appropriate ministers both the environment and the defense. put on this if it was such a trivial issue it wouldn't have been raised throughout the world. for instance i know that in the us the government made an investigation concerning the subject there the conclusions one exhaustive either. probably there is something related to military activity that i think is in shocking the real problem is that when there are experiments in phenomenon of this type the government of the country is the

first to be aware of them. in any case the citizen should be reassured by saying they are experiments or whatever they are but they are not a concern for the health of the citizens. cannot say the difference between the ones caused by the condensation and the ones left out there on purpose so i called speak on the ones left there on purpose or what the purpose is i mean why are they left there. because. the most worrying thing for me is the fact that we didn't receive convincing answers. that's because. i think often exhaustive answers are not given because the knowledge of these phenomena is very limited.

more to people at that this situation increases the number of suspects i understand the authorities approach much more not to give any explanation rather than totally deny they got the u.f.o. they have never been categorically denied by anyone you got if ever there was a huge fraud that can be used at a macroscopic level. why isn't there appropriate research by a corporation or company let's do serious research tell me where the. it was an airplane will fly there to analyze these trails is that so difficult.

there isn't anything to hide i don't understand why not to say to the citizens you don't have to worry because these visual trails don't affect in any way the health nor the climate. no one does this it's probably because there is the answer that it is better not to properly discuss the issue or that it is better not to give any answer at all. that but a military machine is similar to the mechanism of an organization unfortunately everybody becomes a number in this combination but i mean obviously an algebraic variation cannot change anything where the algebraic result is hardly variable that the wishes to find wise and conscientious people in high command are rules people who are able to

accomplish their mission in the best way. i do. about it where tragedy is that in war time the leading principle. where to use a french expression concerning ethics and any other value is doomed to be put aside it's like a football match that has to be won any cost. would be an act of heroism made by someone who is not in harmony with the rest of the scenario as a romantic appeal but it is not in the conditions to modify anything. an act of passion from those in command would be necessary for so much of me every person has his own will every commander has his own autonomy that every commander has to be responsible for his own men good commanders are able to achieve a goal keeping an eye on the loss of good commanders able to oppose an order or

even to change it it's basically people's autonomy as one of resistance i also think that when you are really involved in a conflict the reactions can be quite different it's them but. when we find something able to dissolve the concept of four and we see it in daily relationships each one of us decides not to make war to all the people around us probably this thing could become contagious i don't know how many of us. thank you.

but. probably. didn't. they could.

wealthy british. margetts why not. find out what's really happening to the global economy cause a report on. today's

news and this week's top stories of the day that divided the world remembering the terror attack the problems that america to launch a global policing mission that manny aspirants claim has made the world more dangerous. for every young russia. it's farewell to the players of a top national ice hockey team who perished in a plane crash that killed forty three. and moscow is to send a fact finding mission to syria as president the good news is to take sides in the conflict saying talks are the only way to peace. this is r t coming to you live from moscow i'm marina joshie welcome to the program it was the day that changed history.