does the prospect of a palestinian state cross talk it's coming up next. well . bringing you the latest in science and technology from around the world. we've got the future covered. in the. story. hello and welcome to cross talk i'm peter all about meaningless symbolism or

a game changer in the absence of a peace process the palestinians will ask the united nations to upgrade their current observer status to that a full member state world opinion backs this bid but will it change anything on the ground. and you can. start. to cross-talk the prospects for a palestinian state i'm joined by the end of the two in colorado she's a dubai initiative research fellow palestinian human rights lawyer and a former legal adviser to the palestinian negotiating team and in bed to mash we have betty morris he's a professor at ben gurion university and his most recent book is one state two states resolving the israel palestine conflict all right cross talk rose in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i very much encourage it but first marcia many people are calling this a diplomatic tsunami tell us why that's right peter despite months of desperate efforts by the u.s. and israel to head off a move that could become the next tipping point in the middle east the palestinian

leadership is heading to the united nations with a firm commitment to seek right. admission as a state we are going to be with all options open we're going to the security council we'll go to some of the critics are more than certain the general assembly will vote in favor of palestinian statehood but president obama has been struggling to keep israeli palestinian negotiations afloat has been clear about his opposition to the bid and has warned to go any such request at the security council. for the palestinians efforts to deal with utilize israel will end in failure symbolic actions to isolate israel at the united nations in september won't create an independent state obama's fears are not unwarranted the general assembly vote would leave only the u.s. israel and a handful of other countries in the stark minority on the issue sending a message regarding the legitimacy of the palestinian position in the conflict but above all the vote could cause significant backlash in the middle east already in turmoil from the arab spring the stage is being set for calamity the high risk of

palestinian riots to fully claim this state followed by a very tough israeli crackdowns adding fire to the unexpected and unpredictable popular upheavals in the middle east although initially the palestinians decision to go to the un became a fallback option after the negotiations hit a dead end last year israeli government has warned that the un move would halt the peace efforts i don't think that they will it would get them any closer to their desired other country the meaning of such a step is that they are they prefer to go off or provocation side of then sitting to the negotiating table it is also possible however that fears of a fallout are overblown and that the vote could even inject momentum into the stalled talks predictions about whether the bed or even the notion of palestinian statehood can tangibly transform things on the ground remains to be seen in the

upcoming months. thanks very much for that first i'd like to go to diana in toronto it's being called a symbolic vote and even worse it's a you know a lot unilateral act on the part of the palestinians how do you respond to that after twenty years after oslo. well it is in fact a unilateral act which is what israel has been doing for the past twenty years of negotiations it's been unilaterally creating facts on the ground and while i'm not somebody who believes that this is going to change anything in any respect i do believe that it's about time that the united nations be used as a tool and that the this palestine or p.l.o. or whoever it is that's making the bit begin to put into place measures to actually isolate israel for its ongoing violations of human rights and its ongoing violations of the fourth geneva convention international law you know many i mean who can blame the palestinians i mean they say they haven't really gotten anything

out of what's called the peace process i mean this is kind of like the last resort i mean so how do you feel about that i mean they feel like they've got nothing out of the last twenty years since oslo and this is the last card they can play well there is something in the except that then one forgets history in the year two thousand the palestinians were offered a two state solution in almost all the west bank the gaza strip east jerusalem by the american president bill clinton and they would barak the israeli prime minister and they said no the problem with what they're doing now not only is it you know lateral but it also involves non-recognition of israel as a jewish state in other words they're declaring their statehood but not accepting israel as their neighbor and it's not clear whether the even will accept the sixty seven borders this is in contrast incidentally with one thousand nine hundred forty seven when the un decided on the partition of palestine into two states and israel

at the time accepted a palestinian state next to a jewish state the palestinians of course turned down the two state offer in one nine hundred forty seven as they did in the year two thousand ok dan i mean this issue of recognizing israel is a jewish state but what would that negate the right of return for palestinians to palestine. absolutely and this is why palestinians will never recognize israel as a jewish state nor should we be asked to recognize israel as a jewish state in other words what morris and other individuals are saying is in demanding that palace that we palestinians recognize israel as a jewish state were actually were actually demanding that we accept the ethnic cleansing of our homeland and this is something that no palestinian leader including mahmoud abbas as non-confrontational as he is is going to accept but i want to get back to some of the other issues that have also been mentioned which is that of the negotiations i was somebody who was actually at the negotiations and there was no palestinian state that was offered during any period of the

negotiations there was always and idea that israel is going to continue to control the palestinians control their lives control their air sprays their territory their water etc and there's never been this idea that paulsen should be allowed to be free this is what palestinians are seeking now whether it's going to come at the hands of the united nations or in another form what really needs to be cemented is this idea that israel has to relinquish control over our lives in order for us to be able to live but i mean a lot of people would say by by international recognition of a palestinian state is that it creates a level playing field instead of this hopeless peace process that we've seen which hasn't brought peace to israel hasn't given the state to the palestinians and the enormous amount of mistrust that's there why can't another state be very and then you start to go shooting borders i mean maybe we should just do it the other way around well. well we could do that but i am all for a palestinian state and i'm all for

a two state solution the problem is the palestinians in this in this action and in their continuing demand for refugee return in effect the saying we want all of palestine first we will take the west bank and receive international recognition for that on the gaza strip and then from then from there we will use it as a springboard to conquer the rest of palestine and no israel and no jewish state this unfortunately is the fear of most israelis myself included it both in terms of what the bus is doing and what the majority party in palestine the hamas wants they say so clearly a bus doesn't say so clearly doing it in two stages but they're ultimately aiming at the same goal and this is very unfortunate dan if it can do you respond to that because for twenty years the palestinians and the israelis have been working together i mean the there hasn't been a peace process but they've worked together do you believe that the that there's that deep seated plan where we just first get the west bank and we get gaza is

recognized as a state and then the destruction of israel because i don't come across that argument very often but then again i don't live in israel. now look i think it's really important to put this in perspective the first perspective is that the palestinians have repeatedly recognized israel they did it in eighty eight they did explicitly in one thousand nine hundred three in every single agreement there has been a recognition of israel every single palestinian leader has a does address that they recognize israel. going you know you it is a jewish if you may if you may allow me to continue i will answer your question now the problem is that israel has never recognize palestine there is not a single israeli political party in the knesset that has recognized palestine and palestine is right to exist now going back to the issue of the jewish state the issue of the jewish state is something that was recently added to the negotiations and during the period that actually negotiations existed there was no demand for

a jewish state and the reason that this demand is now cropping up is because israel wants to extinguish the rights of millions of palestinian refugees and wants to ensure that it has the right and the legitimacy to continue to carry out very discriminatory measures and racist measures against the palestinian refugees and against their own citizens who happen to have who happen not to be jewish this is why and no palestinian leader will accept that but in terms of recognizing the actual state and the existence of a state every single political leader has come forward and recognized israel there has not been however a reciprocal recognition of palestinians right to exist by any israeli leader hamas hamas is correct hamas has recognized israel you see every political leader hamas represents more than half of the palestinian people and they did not recognize israel under any conditions and they seized say that. benny in fact they have many in fact they have first images records this year of have. seen please if you will

allow me to finish and not cut me off i've given you that luxury first shot in the spiritual leader of hamas before he was assassinated came out in the interview in haaretz which is an israeli newspaper and said that if israel withdraws completely to the one nine hundred sixty seven borders then in exchange for that withdrawal they will recognize israel and so too has every other leader of hamas including most recently khaled mashaal who equally said that palestinians want to establish a state on the sixty seven borders and this is exactly what he would been talking about is that instead of what is really telling us is untrue reasons to actually an interesting is not true now it is true you can actually go to the other try that you are a historian and you can go now to say is the most shows in fact i can tell you what musharraf says you know he was willing to do or at least in the early truce with israel. has said that he's willing to would truly reach a temporary

a temporary truce with israel also this is really it is good if he is willing to accept one of those are going to say no that's true that's true but he says he hasn't done anything that are really serious i'm saying here you jump in here we go to a break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on the palestine both state party. faraway land. where human life is ruled by nature. of planet earth is carefully preserved by the poor. most lie hidden in the deep permafrost. and for those who deal with them. stored times

are still. mission free accreditation free transport charges free. range from and free is free. to tide free. download free broadcast quality video for your media projects free media. tom. we'll. bring you the latest in science and technology from the realms where should . we dump the future.

and you can. welcome back to cross talk on peter lavelle to mind you were talking about what the future holds for the palestinians. and you can. see. ok benny and i could go to you let's let's could do a hypothetical here you know the general assembly the vast majority of the country the general assembly support the palestinian bid for changing its status of the united nations and we know that the united states will veto it but in the hypothetical case how would this change once the united nations takes a vote it will be in favor of the palestinians how will this change israel's position or will it not change at all. ok let me say something first about what was said until now if the hamas says clearly it wants to destroy israel that's what it says in its founding charter that is still the constitution of that organization

and mahmoud abbas the head of the p.l.o. says he will not recognize israel as a jewish state these affects hey you can say whatever you like people can try and sell you propaganda but these are the facts as to what's going to happen on the ground i don't know i don't know how any vote by the united nations general assembly. will change the situation on the ground what it probably will do is it will incite the masses masses of palestinians into violence and masses of arabs outside of palestine to support what they see as the palestinian cause and a we've seen some of that already in the streets of cairo when they vandalized israeli embassy i assume these sort of things are going to happen in the arab world and in this in palestine itself in the west bank in the gaza strip there will be massive demonstrations attempts to breach israeli settlements all of this will lead to violence and where that goes where we go from there i have no idea well i think the

violence will has already started i mean when we look at the arab spring here diana it's very interesting here i mean the u.s. position because the united states again is going to look very lonely on the international stage when you look at world opinion and if we look at the arab spring what's going on i mean you know the united states will come out and say it supports the freedom of some people but it will not do that for the palestinians apparently and it doesn't do it for the people of bahrain also by the way i mean how does this change the dynamic or does it at all because of the position of the united states in the greater middle east the arab world is so poor anyway. well this is where i think the palestinian leadership needs to take a good hard look at itself and take to learn some lessons which is that for the past twenty years the focus has been entirely on changing opinion in washington and changing somehow getting american president to support palestinian statehood and support palestinian freedom that's not going to happen and i think that they should begin to recognize that that's not going to happen and instead i think that the

palestinian leadership should start turning its direction to a completely different direction and start looking towards other countries around the world to isolate israel for its ongoing human rights abuses its ongoing violations of international law and the fact that israel continues to build settlements in the west bank these are considered war crimes under the statute of the international criminal court so one thing that i think that might be positive and come out of this is that if palestine gets to sign on to the international criminal court then i think it's important for palestine to then start taking israel to court for the fact that these settlements continue for as much as an israeli leader may say that they support a palestinian state one thing that they're not willing to do is to actually halt the establishment of colonies settlements and they're not willing to evacuate the settlers who have been residing there illegally on palestinian land for more than four decades i mean what what can be. moving forward their

policy in recognizing a second state as you write about i mean what does that have to do i mean when the international community is saying that the occupation must come to an end a lot of israelis want to end the calculation as well how could it be done in light of this vote this is just symbolism so many people in israel and washington say. i believe that they'll keep patient shouldn't and i think you're being unfair to the americans the americans have supported palestinian statehood and continue to support palestinian state with the problem for the palestinians is that the americans also support israeli statehood and this they find enough them a one perhaps advantage which might arise from a declaration of palestinian statehood an acceptance by the united nations all of palestinian statehood would be that the palestinians could also be taken to court in the international court in the hague say for the promotion of terror for the promotion of terrorism and orchestration of terrorism by people in the gaza strip and maybe in the west bank as well so i have a feeling this may be

a two edged sword well it's interesting to know that you know i was going to ask. yes i see it israel's also taken to the international criminal court for particularly for its actions over gaza and the killing of over fourteen hundred palestinians in the gaza strip half of which were children so i certainly hope that we begin to take this to an international arena and i can assure the israelis that on this level the palestinians will win because international law is on the side of the palestinian cause it's israel that has been and i was not so sure salaam not the palestinians go ahead ben i'm not so sure go ahead i'm not so sure that your his entourage or any israelis have been. yes but i know a little more about the past apparently i don't think the policy israelis have been in violation of international law more moral than the palestinians but yeah but history history knows they have one story the problem the problem is that the palestinians have been offered a two state solution a compromise since one thousand nine hundred thirty seven one thousand nine hundred thirty seven thousand nine hundred forty seven one thousand nine hundred seventy

eight two thousand and two thousand and eight when it would almost all for to begin a two state solution to the palestinians on the right bus and the palestinians have always said no the problem is that this action of going to the united nation that the paper is not. just isn't just that the palestine papers say nothing there are selection of documents from god knows where they're not important we don't really know where the palestinian stand what we do know is when olmert put the package on the table about said no the same as when it bill clinton then it would barak put the package on the table and yasser arafat said no that we know ok danny said i'm glad i'm a kid somebody said more i think in a conversation go ahead. so i'm sure that under that package may well first of all i want to i want to put it pose a question to mr morris which is that let's assume we can go back to the partition plan now would you accept the partition plan now in other words would you accept that that your state be comprised of less than fifty five percent of what it is now

are you talking about the one nine hundred forty seven partition maran of the night of the two thousand yes well i'm about as communalism no i didn't but i'm asking on this nine hundred forty seven no no i'm asking about the nine hundred. what are you now let me roll back here is a quality response and actually our space. let me respond i don't think i would rebel back no because i think history doesn't allow peoples to renege on their mistakes in other words the palestinians in forty seven should have accepted the partition plan as the jews did they said no and you lose when you go to war against an international and then to nationally sponsored settlement and you lose the war then you can say well now i want to go back to the status quo ante that doesn't happen in history and the fast says the situation is i mr morris really doesn't push you have not agreed to give up more nobody made an issue go ahead edition go ahead benny finish up go ahead. you're not you are so you're what happened after

forty eight is that israel retain seventy eight percent of palestine and the arabs not the palestinians we're in a tension of about twenty two percent and that essentially is the sixty seven border so it's not fair let me go now before which international community that's the internet what the international community support let's unless there are. really support this really support the sixty seven border my my point my point in all of this my point in all of this peter is that it's very well and good for people to now in the year two thousand and eleven talk about what the palestinians should have done in one nine hundred forty seven but if we actually look back to what has done what happened in history if now benny morris is in that very same position he would not agree to give up any more of his of of the territory that israel controls even already he's not willing to give up the territory that israel controls in terms of the sixty seven borders so i think it's fictitious to start

talking about the offers that palestinians turn down and i think we should instead start looking towards the future and the future is if the israelis want to have peace they have to begin to recognize the palestinians as equals and this is something that no israeli leader has committed himself to whether it's under the guise of two states or one state all that i want is to be treated as an equal and all that benny morris and all of the other israeli establishment want is to continue to subjugate me their heritage here in lies the problem benny i mean i don't go very nice i don't belong to this i don't belong i don't belong to the israeli establishment my historical works show that quite well. what i say is that the palestinians should ask that i and mr martin's. and accept the equal rights and have a two state solution so long as they refuse a two state solution and want all of palestine there will be no settlement no peace only violence go ahead i think that palaces have already accepted the two state

solution it's the israel hasn't exactly they haven't the fact that we know is one of the no. more than. three housing units being established just last month alone we saw more than six thousand two hundred housing units being established in in the west bank this is clear indication that israel doesn't want to have a two state solution but instead it wants to create bantu stands for the palestinians and this is something that no palestinian leader including the likes of us is going to accept unfortunately benny i have always i've always opposed to the settlement enterprise i continue to oppose the settling settlement enterprise as an obstacle to peace it is an obstacle to peace but it's not the major obstacle to peace the major obstacle to peace is the palestinian desire to wipe israel off the map this is the problem ok i don't i'm going to give you a lot out that you have a lot more you know. what is this going to do she's just going to isolate israel

more and if it isolates israel more doesn't that make israel just put its back up against a wall we don't go anywhere here go ahead i certainly hope it does isolate israel and i certainly hope that spawning from this will begin to see boycotts of israel we begin to see sanctions imposed on israel and we begin to see more and more international activity in an international legal arena rather than through this farcical negotiations that have taken place it's time for israel to be held accountable and i hope it certainly is after this after this u.n. session ok benny and what are you going to be the last word twenty seconds go ahead . i really wish that the palestinians would return to the negotiating table to which they've been invited repeatedly and actually do so seriously in good faith and negotiate the two state solution they don't want to do that there won't be any settlement the palestinians will continue to suffer all right we'll see what happens next week many thanks to my guests today in toronto and in fact thanks to

our viewers for watching us here r.t. see you next time and remember. to take. an issue free could you take three months for charges free. range month free. three stooges free. download free broadcast quality video for your media project a free media oh don carty dot com.

as colonel gadhafi is remaining troops hold out against government forces and nato air strikes in libya the french president faces a legal battle at home over his country's intervention in the war. statehood showdown at the un is the general assembly prepares to vote on the status of palestine with deep divisions bearing to break the surface. plus international efforts being stepped up to border tension in kosovo where neither locals or nor serbs seem willing to back down after recent bloodshed. it's eight am in moscow i'm at treasure good to have you with us here on r t our top story in libya government forces are turning up the heat on colonel qaddafi remaining supporters to.