essay or check out our you tube page at you tube dot com slash r t america you can also follow me on twitter i'm at christine for zero now to go right now but we'll be back here in a half hour. in canada and the us that it is legal for you to use a bubble bath on your baby that contains a known carcinogen something that causes cancer most of the shine through right most put in different they are sponsored by things but it and most of the crime rate on the plates is a cough with a few of us today an average cancer drug prescription costs nearly one thousand six hundred dollars a month a month but nobody with cancer and my father and therefore i prefer to focus because ninety to ninety five percent of cancers her people with health funding history of cancer and pharmaceutical industry spends about fourteen percent of

their budget on research and development and about thirty one percent for marketing and administration. in fact there are more pharmaceutical industry lobbyists in washington d.c. and members of congress. you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so for langley you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else and you hear or see some other part of it and realized everything you thought you knew you don't know i'm sorry welcome to the big picture . he.

i've. i've. i've. i've mission and frigidaire credits they should be free. for charges free. maintenance free. grief still child free i've done little free blogging as a plug in video for your media projects for free media and on the hard t.v. dot com.

leaflet. it. would. ruin. in two thousand and two the top ten drug companies in america made more profits than four hundred ninety of america's wealthiest companies combined helping raise profits are cancer drugs which in two thousand and five alone rose nearly sixteen percent compared to three percent for other prescriptions. today an average cancer

drug prescription costs nearly one thousand six hundred dollars a month. the pharmaceutical industry spends about fourteen percent of their budget and research and development and about thirty one percent for marketing and administration. in fact there are more pharmaceutical industry lobbyists in washington d.c. than members of congress food and drugs act in the united states and in food and drugs and canada are not being a budget. this is a very serious problem this is been the fight that i have fought for now for the last twenty years in canada and together with my colleagues and my union and a lot of other people and as a result of these three of us our committee were fired by health care that for years the took to build up this clears and ultimately failed us and saying we

should pass everything that america passes and you saying we cannot we are a country with a sovereign country we have to solve or not none of us refused to conduct their work if this insubordination to pass drugs of questionable safety or harmful products then of course we want to be in support if that's the way it is let the canadian government see that that this is what they're fighting us for the companies pressured to get this fired this weary the longer the weird the more time they get to continue doing what they're doing. they have caught at least ten years it may take longer to keep selling the same stuff and damaging the health of people to make profit on the backs of people's health that was the insubordination to

him . to escape the same chemical companies that produce pesticides chlorine and dioxin and known barked on a new frontier biotechnology. this new technology has been used to transfer genes from one organism to another and has subsequently enabled companies to patent and own the organisms that they genetically modify that means that seeds plants and even trees which are modified using this technology can be privately owned by corporations for the first time in history. all right i'll

sleep with her much i want to and as for some city. they said well yeah we got some but they made that expensive seat so how much all that a lot got what it was now but they was quite a bit over and. i didn't silo graeme wood and they didn't ask me styling because somebody else at the bar met somebody had them bottom and killed them out and bought a mat so i down and plant less and you can quite blast right on top of our you know as i want at the end of the plant and then i did. with brass flake i don't i don't like colorado bass because most solace. they all. but anyway i tried to sleep and that was when most i worked on them that. you know

i said i got a patent on that there's no you can't have a patent was the cause mother nature bottom line so the guy that sold you the seed he for much to have you sign a license just said here's a new vegas he didn't know the slave was brought back by somebody else somebody does sound out on he want to get rid of those eighty one people no matter what most a lawyer when he got a deposition or they do you really get back to sleep as a star. that i don't never read a bag say because i'm be too busy working and stuff like it and then trying to keep it running here and he's the most a great that was forged by one of most are represented that's not my hand right now i say now is my hand right now. this is my hand right now right here. that's my hand right is that look he thanked it cost me five thousand dollars to prove that

that was not my hand. and judge wright is simple would not allow this debate and the cool prestigious our justice system lately sucks a lily sucks it's just a corrupt company perfectly. mr rolfe was fined over two point nine million dollars for patent infringement in regards to seeking seats. the district judge in mr ross case was rodney simple a former attorney who worked at the law firm that represents monsanto and who is listed as one of monsanto's attorneys in one thousand nine hundred ninety seven class action lawsuit. from two thousand two thousand and eight right he said who was the judge in eleven cases of which monsanto was the plaintiff or defendant eleven cases were ruled in one sense his favor.

i found that the original research grants came from the new york foundation and that was the rockefeller foundation and that they had spent over one hundred million dollars of their foundation money to finance scientists around the world to do research to genetically modified some of the basic food seeds in the human food chain in the animal from change and the more i researched into this the more i found that three maybe four companies a few clued the swiss sent into up to three main companies and one among them was dominant and that's monsanto but these are what i call in the book the four horsemen of the apocalypse these private seed companies they were originally chemical companies stupid poised within five or ten years at the rate they were going to dominate the basic seeds and patent those scenes that much power concentrated into four corporate entities three of whom have decades long track

record of fraud deception lying to the public about the dangers of dioxin the dangers of agent orange and the vietnam war and for and so for. that really set off the alarm bells for me. i got involved in the g.m. issue because you know it was a new technology and bringing up obscene things and i still see them as officers and. i was the only discipline there that she took part in four years of trawling. they were the monsanto to get a great president and i mean they were all in this group in the greens to the farm the trial work which all told the two hundred sixty odd different i mean

not just canonical three did spring and winter nodded both on the farm collector a gross spring right occasionally when i have to when i have a failure in the winter so i did both of those draws on the farm for three years did the first year as a winter protocol the over they decided exactly how they are with us at the trial in zero. eight they didn't like me long to realize at least walls a potentially simpler way to fall and therefore it was cheaper therefore we could the benefits that could be seen to be bad had been passed on before he's chafer me to grow and if the price of the end product carried down i could still juicy after the end of the doubt got to make a knowledge of whatever i'm doing as it happened because of the technology we were also following through the g.m. crop yield a bit more when the convention called in the same field under otherwise similar management because i was doing the. that's dear what

now thirteen years of crops in the field the theory is that. we have a herbicide tolerant tree that we use the demand for herbicides and we have and a trait that will protect farmers predict props from some does some tests that's the theory. even that can't be proven finally at this stage and there's a still a constant battle union yang going on between researchers and the companies distant show whether or not this really does work or not. we're not seeing increase food production we're not seeing increased benefits to farmers in terms of their pression costs we're not seeing improved nutritional qualities in our in our table so there really isn't a clear benefit. everywhere

you go this is seem to be the worst that is surgeons have to apply for grants. from the phone companies are on the the campuses. students

from beginning. can do a ph d. and in what subject and whether they can publish those materials because they're not warned by the us so it's wherever you go there is this kind of corruption going on this is not science. people who want to administer the falklands are not competent or even qualified or educated in science these are accountants these are lawyers these are m.b.a.'s is that anything but scientists this interesting since i have become part of the uk. what do you think about genetically modified food it's interesting john yeah i think it's definitely safe but as long as there's a regulation there's been research and everything there's. no research showing that

it's not safe or that there's any difference between it and regular not modified food and scholarships they give us gosh oh yeah there's lots yeah lots from it cardio some go. better than yeah all the different chemical companies and everything like that for sure. so yeah they're getting involved in there's definitely have. a presence on campus for sure. it is the first time in the history of mankind that we have been able to engineer the genetic inheritance of living beings a man it would be wise to ask if there are side effects and to check on them when you insert artificial genes anywhere by bombarding an organism or plants general metabolism can be affected it could be terrible. if somebody could prove it is dangerous or really good. for us. very possibly because he would have arguments that there would be elsewhere but as long. as nobody has the argument.

it's better to go on thinking. there is no reason why this should be. monsanto made p.c.p. is that they were a huge chemical company and they own ninety percent of the biotechnology patents so we took some of those g.m. corn i was part of the commission which was assessing this corn. and we said where are the blood tests firstly the tests on rats didn't go beyond three months which was crazy they concealed the results not from the commission but from the public there were affects many others on the commission said no it doesn't matter we said we must at least start over but we didn't so we asked it to be made public we had to go to a court of appeal monsanto went before the court to stop the world scientists and

the general public from seeing the blood tests on rats who ate their genetically modified corn for only three months. as you can you imagine. the world's largest company which sells the most herbicides and which sells virtually the most g.m. seeds in the world goes to court to prevent disclosing blood test results of rats who ate their g.m.o. foods for only three months and that's crazy. so we published the effects that we had observed there was a forty eight percent increase in fat a ten percent increase in sugar in the females an increase in liver with an increase in body which. resembled a pre-diabetic symptom the rats urine samples were abnormal particularly in the male rats the rats lost wit and their livers were affected by. it in the past thirty years there have been no government tests. all the world's drugs

are only tested by pharmaceutical companies the same goes for pesticides. in the late one nine hundred ninety s. cutter to go but see that his local organic supplier the seeds turned out to be contaminated with dmoz so he filed a complaint to uncover where the contamination originated but in two thousand and one the case was dropped mr pickard who was then contacted by a group of american farmers to join them in a class action lawsuit against months santo dupont dow chemical astra zeneca and novartis international accusing them of engaging in anti trust activities and failure to test for human health and environmental safety coincidently the judge was rightly simple the same judge as in mr ross case a case was ruled in favor of the chemical company.

gene in my field was a paid intense monsanto gene which was sold to me in seeds by as a girl which is a monsanto subsidiary i agreed to take part in a class action lawsuit in the united states so in two thousand i went to washington d.c. to testify and to answer the questions asked by monsanto's lawyers all day they asked questions such as do you know your neighbors names i much tax do you pay and where nothing to do with g.m. seeds. are made tended to meetings up in ministry of agriculture recently during which they tried to impose on a bill for a ministerial order for coexistence determining a twenty five yard distance between two fields of corn. that means that my neighbor g.m. crops twenty five yards away from my field and yes we officially proved in two thousand

and six and two thousand and seven that land three hundred yards away was contaminated. maybe there's not much organic corn today. maybe there is someone with five acres of organic corn surrounded by people with by five hundred acres of g.m. corn. so he's not important you can just die out that's the situation if you're small you don't matter any make room for those who will feed the world. farmers in my group managers will feed the world having poisoned it for years it's unbelievable their objective is obvious they want to sell the seeds and the herbicide with the same company makes them both the objective is to liberate the farmer or to make them independent it isn't to make a better product for the consumer. the problem is pesticides and g.m.

knows. what does eating g.m. food do to our d.n.a. chin yourselves and to our children cells we don't know. for the past twelve years genetically modified crops have been growing on a large scale around the world they feed both us and our animals we haven't observed any problems due to g.m. consumption either direct or indirect this french farmer is completely self-sufficient along with four hundred fifty million other farmers worldwide the practices are again it probably cultural farming compared to conventional chemical agriculture this type of farming produces soil with three times more earthworms produces eighty percent more yields in developing nations and fruits and vegetables that are up to forty percent more nutritious studies even show that this type of organic farming could feed today's population and more so why do governments still

give the majority of subsidies to conventional chemical farming companies claim we need g.m. crops to feed the world. if this is the case then why in america where g.m. crops have been commercialized the longest are thirty five million americans still food insecure. see on next thing if you experiment with something without any follow up it's almost criminal off it pesca to me now because what we're doing isn't very serious remember stamp your feet and yet that's what every government has done because biotechnology is their religion sheet they think it will develop so that it will be goods while but that's just a belief because of it would yeah it's just like when we were told the earth was flat or you could rather than the reality of e.g. you're in a handy thing. there's

someone from the european union commission that explained it to my wife at the time they didn't know that she was my right she doesn't carry my name say she's a professor rather though it's not a professor of history they explained it to her that. if if they had repeated the study they found similar things that we thought they would be able to hush it up again as runs it was bad enough. twice is sort of still possible what i had he got it or so as the most important thing father studies is that there is an immune response. and in each case since then whatever the jihad was they looked at the indian status of the other wars they always

felt that it was jeopardized when we looked at the rat who had been having with g.m. then the clip that was illuminated and that we wouldn't have expected if the g.m. is substantially equivalent and the same then the length of the should be identical but they weren't so open all at the sternal tract really lining was growing it was thick and so we thought this was evidence that there was a growth factor at work i was your ply that to transition lesion in the human for example with the lower end of your surface if you apply the growth factor of the vera then you might histon the development of malignancy at the lower end of your saw for those and similarly in the stomach those once again transitional

lesions there which are normally able to time to develop into cancer the gut and its image system the gars this as for the material it's almost like i think it's not an infection and that the immune system just sees something coming in as strange for it and it has to be act to it i just think that. it was highly irresponsible. forced on us something that was not properly examined. and we are all made to be exposed to it that's highly irresponsible or infact i would say that it's probably criminal but they have this sense to

be monsanto. bayer dupont dow chemical. and ask is and i declined to be interviewed for this. a six six. six six six. six.

six. six. six thanks. to fix it. wealthy british scientists. time to.

market finance come to find out what's really happening to the global economy with much stronger for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines tune into a report. download the official seattle acacias phone on pod touch from the i choose ops to. watch on t.v. life on the go. video and among all keys mind rules costs an r.s.s. feeds now in the palm of your. question. you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else you hear or see some other part of it and realize that everything is.