mission accomplished after almost two decades of negotiations russia is welcomed as a member of the world trade organization joining the prestigious club to strengthen state countries global ties and provides an incentive for business with the russian economics ministry saying consumers can look forward to price council around ten percent but others fear there could be trouble ahead for some sectors warning of rough times in agriculture and car making. a u.s. court has ruled that scene a rainy and political figures including its supreme leader provided help to the nine eleven hijackers for their attacks in america ten years ago none of the rain politicians have appeared in court critics say it's part of a build up campaign against iraq. truthteller traitor a u.s. army private accused of leaking state secrets to weaken me appears at

a pretrial hearing in court after spending eighteen months in solitary confinement if found guilty he could face the death penalty or life in prison. and norm bradley manning in our debate crosstalk next on our city. hello and welcome to cross talk i'm carol about hero or traitor these are among the labels to describe bradley manning and he's a legend involvement in the week in weeks three weeks of hundreds of thousands of classified state department cables can he get a fair trial in the u.s.

and what is the future of whistleblowers. to cross-talk bradley manning's alleged involvement in the release of classified cables i'm joined by seton motley in washington he is the president and editor in chief of less government in oklahoma city we have james brown he is the co-chair of the military law task force of the national lawyers guild and in berkeley we cross to bob meo he is a peace and justice activist and a commissioner on the peace and justice commission of the city of berkeley gentlemen this is crosstalk that means you can jump in anytime you want and i very much encourage it but first let's have a look at some of the issues surrounding p.f.c. bradley manning. the case of wiki leaks suspect bradley manning today it's the first step in a legal process that could end with a life sentence for a u.s. soldier accused of leaking a trove of military and diplomatic documents private manning who turned twenty four

tomorrow a superior in a court martial in maryland in an intense debate over the merits of the allegations that we recognize as having done the right that manning was apprehended in iraq in two thousand and ten on suspicion of giving without permission thousands of classified documents to the whistle blowing website we can wait. the documents were subsequently published worldwide and led to the controversial revelation of diplomatic and military secrets including possible war crimes for the last eighteen months the soldier has been held in pretrial detention much of it in solitary confinement under conditions that have drawn the attention of amnesty international and the american civil liberties union i have actually asked the pentagon whether or not. the procedures that have been taken terms of his confinement are appropriate and are meeting our basic standards they assure me that they are in response pentagon has assured that the conditions are appropriate given the seriousness of the charges but the growing list of manning supporters insist on

the contrary saying the conditions are out of proportion to the accusations and recently more than fifty european parliament members moved an open letter to the us government questioning the whistleblowers treatment in custody and the justification for possibility of the death penalty and life in prison proceedings against many are expected to last around five days followed by a decision of whether the case will proceed to trial russia china may for cross talk r.t. . ok so you can if i go to you in washington first is manning a freedom of information idealist or a national security threat you know well if he's killed as you said allegedly if he's done what he's been accused of doing he's a national security threat you know it's not his job to make that decision that's not how the military works that's not how top secret information works and i would prefer he's guilty of all these things i would certainly want to i sense there's not in fact the death penalty ok that's pretty strong there james if i go to you in

oklahoma city how do you stand on this is is many a national security threat and should he go to prison for the rest of his life. if the allegations are correct and we don't know if they are yet but if they are i believe he's a whistleblower he deserves protection he revealed information that showed that the us troops committed war crimes he gave accurate information healy allegedly leaked showed accurate counts of civilian casualties which had previously not been reported that information important the american people deserve that information the world deserves that information bob what do you think about this i mean it's interesting is that it is since the release of the of these cables the u.s. government has said well you know. the they're not that bad they're just an embarrassment i mean no major secrets were released and anyone in the press corps covering these illegal wars could have found a lot of this information out of the actually the weekend leaks just confirmed a lot of things that people already knew. right if bradley manning did what he's

accused of he's definitely an american hero and this one is a certain you mentioned top secret nothing bradley manning allegedly released was classified top secret now daniel ellsberg good point during the time of the pentagon papers everything he released was top secret and yet what ok let's analyze his analyze it's lesser ways he has me less or less or that's lesser classification secretively it's not his fault i'm actually hundreds of thousands and it's not his call to have access to the same thing if you're twenty one you know it's not his call to make he evidence of your government committing war crimes we told them at nuremberg we told the germans that they had a duty to not obey illegal orders was over that point what he tried is no way a little bit of history man is us not bradley manning is called a may ok the us constitution by binds us to international treaties and us law so if he is guilty of what he is accused of he was trying to uphold the constitution

ok seaton you want you have an answer go ahead yes who authorized the private in the army to release this information how do you think the president of yemen feels when bradley manning outed the fact that he's helping americans against al qaeda you think you think he's thrilled about that release if you want to get in a ticky tack of whether or not it's top secret that the president of yemen may very well end up dead because of bradley manning for helping the united states against a terrorist enemy who wants to destroy us how is that helpful how is that uploading an ideal actually go ahead bob actually the government has admitted it oh let's go to bob that nobody has been harmed by anything released by by wiki leaks that at this point and that you want to be so bad to garnish your that's all garbage have gone to the packets the pakistan taliban. got to pakistan and had the money turned around and given to pakistan the. then in afghanistan to fight u.s. troops i think the american people want to know that and whoever released that is

a hero ok but james if i go back to you and i'll call you answer my question about you have more answer my question about yemen how we're going to get allies to help us if we want to help them out of a private first class is going to help them for helping the united states. gentlemen you know hillary clinton has already admitted you know and gates secretary of defense gates also. what has been released the cables were embarrassing but they have both admitted that there has been no risk to national some of their role in embarrassing for the yemeni president in the case is it you shouldn't the hands of all right gentlemen gentlemen ok judy it is embarrassing for decades in oklahoma city you want to jump in there going to the hundreds of thousands of people who have been killed due to the illegal war just the i would gentleman i'd like to go to james we have all james is also a guest on the program james go ahead that's. the fundamental one of the issues that keeps coming up scene keeps arguing that is

a private first class at least in this matter what gives him the right to a leak this the truth is that every soldier of every rake has not just the right but a duty to stop work crimes whenever possible nuremberg principles and make this very clear it doesn't matter what his rank is certainly it's been to the top the generals know so someday if you choose generation it's very very likely that high ranking officers possibly presidents could stand to stand trial for war crimes trials that future may come but right now the one guy that will not be standing trial charges for trials and that is p.f.c. bradley manning so you don't you want to. feel bad smashingly and go ahead you you you you you accuse me of improperly using top secret i think you're blatantly abusing the term war crimes what he released was damaging to national security was damaging to our allies not just not just yemen but any ally that's helping us for instance jordan and other countries that are helping us against the terrorist threat and by outing one you are damaging our relationships with all of them and

that's that to me is a war crime james go ahead. if you want evidence of war crimes all you need to do is do a google search look up in youtube collado murder you can see in the video what us troops did so slaughtering innocent civilians from several hundred feet up in the air it's there you can see it see it with your own eyes and that we would not have information that weren't for bradley manning bob do you want to jump in there he should be you to video yeah i do thank you not only is collateral murder evidence of atrocities war crimes but it's not an aberration it's typical of what soldiers have told us happens every day in recent years it is going to get us today didn't god doesn't appear to be there and everybody knows that it didn't contact is the person the military talking there had by not making any sense because i was trying i was talking go ahead bob please don't interrupt me go ahead. there are there are

many videos besides collateral murder footage from both afghanistan and iraq that show atrocities and war crimes we know that soldiers called in an airstrike to cover up evidence of shooting point blank five month old to seventy year old people families with their hands handcuffed behind them and shot in the head the airstrike was covered in called in to cover the the evidence of the shootings. so is this is true in the. military chain of command private first class to wiki leaks or is there is there a chain of command to which you should have well here to which you should have reported which he didn't do well i mean if you if i could jump in here see if i use general here gentlemen here she did i mean i mean but that's the whole point of this isn't it i mean he would never been allowed to release this information because he'd gone through the chain of command that's how do you suppose that's why

he made it very hard to believe and we know well how do you how convinced are you of that it would happen it's very strange i mean you because you thought i was in her i don't think i could ninety nine percent of the military are war criminals and i think if you reported it up the food chain they would have dealt with it properly and it wouldn't have damaged international security risks you're saying don't realize kerry is going on you're saying the gentlemen i'm sorry said usa had no choice so i listened went to the merry ways please please please bob this is a seat and you're saying the military can police itself yeah let's give it a charitable bradley manning did not give it a chance and he did not give it an opportunity and he bypassed it all and damage international security for our troops and our allies even though the president even the secretary of state says that's not the case for all we know he may have the obama secretary of state keep that in mind for all we know at this point he may have ok i don't know what bradley manning shared with the screen and we don't know

all right bob before we go to the branding is. bradley manning is supposed to have gone to his superior to say that iraqis were being turned over for torture and was told to shut up go back to his desk so if that happened he had no choice but to obey a higher law saying something instead of the water launches and torture would just take a tap to double tap of the head is that what you're saying that's obama solution to not waterboarding is a double tap to the head and drone missile we're not is that better than bomb i think you have to say you know that i mean sure we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on bradley manning stay with our king. and.

just keep.

lists a bit. and

you can. start. welcome back to cross talk on your live else too mind you we're talking about the bradley manning case. and you can. start. ok seat and i go back to you in washington i don't want everyone to be beating up on you including myself ok but you know one of the interesting things is that we

can leaks they didn't release information to of to an enemy government to a terrorist group release it to the media and the wash in the way the new york times the new york times let me finish the new york times i think was the guardian and your spiegel they were all part of it too should they be put on trial as well for releasing this information i mean they're just as culpable not just bradley manning. you're no no because we first of all america we have a first amendment once they get the information they're aware of what they can print if i want they shouldn't but the new york times did i mean they did let you finish your time certainly time and time again is put national security at risk to run a story but we have the first amendment that's the there is not a first amendment and to speak all in germany but we have a first amendment here the fact of the matter is you want to bypass bradley manning who some reason for all this i mean he released information he absolutely had no right to release and he should be if he's guilty i think certainly sort of life in

prison and at the very least ok james if i can go to you i mean there's ample amount of evidence that bradley manning should have never been in the position that he was put into while he was in the military because of his psychiatric background and we number of people around him have been. been reprimanded and even lost their job i mean isn't the military just as much as responsible for what happened here because he certainly was they wouldn't give him a gun because they didn't trust him with it so they gave them all of this thing again you know you know you're giving him all this access to information i mean isn't the military culpable as well here. well i mean that in a way yes but i would argue that that i don't want to focus on bradley manning the sanity issues because i think arguably he did the most sane thing a person can do in a horrible situation he stood up for what is right he found a way to push back against against unthinkable atrocities and he pushed back that i

think is really point we have to come back to and then to say that bradley manning is not going to get a fair trial in our current system and there's really three main issues that i see there that relate to that one is the issue of unlawful command influence president obama has already pronounced him guilty on camera he can't get a fair trial unlawful command influence often court martial get kicked out of the ground secondly we have major major major violations of article thirteen of the uniform code of military justice in that bradley manning was effectively tortured for months after months after months of being locked in solitary being denied clothing it's just completely an excusable finally bradley manning will be denied a jury of his peers we know that because of the military system of justice which has a lot of good aspects the one thing that is atrocious about it is that you were never tried by a jury of your peers you instead tried by a jury handpicked by the convening authority high ranking military officers or if you're enlisted you can request enlisted but guess who they're going to pick they're a high ranking handpicked noncommissioned officers in other words the jury is here

and picked the people bringing the charges that is unconscionable ok and because of that we know we know bradley manning so i can get a fair trial ok james if i'm going to see james is describing a kangaroo court. well what he's describing isn't a pluggable to a military tribunal and in a court martial trial you don't get a jury of your peers it's not a constitutional civil trial first of all second of all he's disease dismantle the definition of the term torture just like he's demand to dismantle the term war crimes. being in solitary confinement is not torture especially considering the guy is a set of and they want to keep him away from other people as much as possible which i sort of understand given the fact and third i want to point out i love the fact other part of his defense is is he a hero or is he violently insane you know i think i don't think i've always said if i only play and say no ok we haven't gotten that far yet ok ok what we touched in

the head and therefore once again you're bypassing culpability for manning by saying he's touching the head it's the military is fault it's the press is fault the fact of the matter is he did this if he didn't do this none of the others to you're trying to. guilt would would be in this discussion ok when we negotiated maybe we should be put on trial to bob what do you how do you feel about all of this do you think manning's way to get a fair trial i passing manning again well we can't leaks was the conduit come out of the secret is that i had said it's not going to buy a big new side of manning hadn't done what he did wiki leaks would have had nothing to publish ok bob go ahead and ok i want to follow up on what james said about undue command influence. everybody should be clear that we're talking about a jury of career military officers who want to advance their military careers and how could they hear the evidence and possibly say not guilty when the commander in

chief when their boss has already said quote he broke the law unquote it's impossible that it was a tragedy running down just like the eleven were asked to mr running down the entire military and. as evil war criminals and incapable of properly judging they're going to i really crosses you there and i don't blame the military except bradley manning in this conversation everybody in the military is guilty to you except bradley manning believe in due process we're talking about now don't go in there not evil ok this is a court martial this is not a constitutionally billion draws a big seat and i mean i guess what really makes them look to be about military we'll see if i can go gentlemen please constitute lease gentlemen marshal right everybody constitutional military law says no participant before trial he's been punished for nineteen months now before trial ok seat and i mean really what's at stake here is ok i can see how you want to punish bradley manning ok because he

didn't follow the chain of command but really what's what is really what hurts the military so much nicer so much of let me finish a question please is it the cables reveal that the military's involvement in these wars has been less than honorable you have to at least admit that or you believe that the cables or false. does that change a single thing about what bradley manning did no no but i think you're changing the subject to disguise the route of the united states and where does the united states foreign wars and this is the way the military wanted and it's a chilling effect is i want to talk about whistleblowers now never talk about the atrocities that u.s. soldiers commit in foreign wars this is what this trials all about is it was first of all i don't think i think the description of what's what he revealed is way overblown and overwrought and gnashing of teeth and pulling of air second of all this is about bradley manning i was told the segment was about bradley manning and none of this conversation would be occurring if bradley manning had violated his oath to the military and violated the law and released these documents period we've

had to the other two guests it was certainly bob and berkeley has condemned as evil everybody in the military except bradley manning bob you want to jump in there go ahead i said anybody was evil don't misquote me you said that you said that they were that they were the he couldn't report to anybody in the military because they all would have covered up war crimes and then you said they're incapable of getting a fair trial because every single you know something he went to the sort of ira officer and his superior didn't want to hear it ok james you want to jump in there from and also in the city go ahead james. who you know what a couple things one is we don't know what bradley manning reported to chain of command he may very well have a pretty short change that he may very well if it were part of the office the inspector general he may have done other things we don't know that so i guess you know i'm assuming that he has done those things but even if he didn't i want to go back to the issue of the jury because because see and you've been bringing up this issue that the court martial is not a constitutional civil trial i agree it's not

a civil trial because it's criminal but it is still constitutional still bound by the u.s. constitution and still bound by international norms of international law and my argument by the rats as about international law really you know it's morsel general well that's fine but i do my own ride on the issue of joanne's lane abortion is illegal since laws for abortion i think you're going to international law oh ok you want to go around saying the same words you know i when it comes to. you want to pry your shoes which international law i don't want to know that you know why do we want to do i mean i find gentlemen going you know we're going nowhere we want to hear national laws yes go ahead james continue with your legal perspective go ahead . but the standpoint of the issue of jury money argument is that the idea of appears as something from the very beginnings of our nation's history and even going back to back to back to british history the common law tradition where part

of it is the idea that you should be judged by your peers and by people that are disinterested at the very least can we at least agree that the members of the jury pool not be picked by the convening authority be picked by another chain of command from or picked randomly from the military why don't we do that but no we have to have a system where the jury pool is hand picked by the accusers that i'm sorry that is a kangaroo court that is not fair and that is not just and it has to change and not just for bradley manning the for all the other other soldiers who are facing charges in the military justice system there's a lot of good things about the military justice system as far as right to counsel is much better in the civilian world there's a lot of good things i can tell you to but the negative we have to fix the jury ok you should be tried by a real jury of your book a seat and i mean i can ask you a question here i mean there's a lot of commentary that without these weekly leaks and without the key role it legibly because we'll find out later bradley manning's involvement in this is that

we wouldn't have the arab spring because of so many people on the ground realised what kind of relations terrible family let me listen to a lot of people on the ground realised how much their governments were involved at the united states and committing legal acts and governments are very very embarrassed again i know how you feel about keeping the focus on our bradley manning but you know he's in the middle of a huge storm ok and a lot of people thank you for the arab spring even though you don't like the idea yeah the muslim brotherhood is taking over in egypt that's fantastic that's democracy you know that's democracy what that's democracy who. monkee voting is democracy it doesn't mean it's a good thing if you don't like the outcome don't you know get angry with the concept. why first of all we're republic we're not a democracy what they're doing over there it isn't given for a dictator oh i said i'd go for a constitutional for. them. i'm asking you what is your ideal national the international law for the ok bob i'm going to be the last one here bob has got the last word in berkeley guide. bradley manning filed his

conscience we told the nazis the soldiers have a duty to obey a higher law bradley manning did the right thing if he did what he's accused of doing so the military the knowledge that you ok he's an american i don't mean fascinating conversation we've run out of time many thanks to my guest today in washington oklahoma city and berkeley and thanks to our viewers for watching as you are to see you next time and remember prostate. cancer. the close up team has been on the black sea coast for future developments depends

on the good way. our team goes area or a place to many find champions and most ambitious. has ruined the lives of many innocent families across the region. where the oldest city in russia is found clocking in more than five thousand years. to dodge a stunning watch a close up on our t.v. . well. it's technology in.