that youth activist spirit appears to have stalled the military rulers who replaced mubarak seem to be exploiting opposition splits and popular fears of chaos to shore up their power and confine the extent of change is a counter revolution now managing egypt. and. cross-talk change in egypt a year after the revolution i'm joined by bradley blakeman in washington he was a senior staffer in the administration of george w. bush and currently a professor at georgetown university in chicago we have david faris he's an assistant professor of political science at roosevelt university all right gentlemen this is crosstalk that means you can jump in anytime you want and i very much encourage it but first let's see what's happened in egypt a year on. the iconic séance of the egyptian revolution shook the middle east and the west by the magnitude of the events and the dramatic changes that followed it tolls started with

a day off rage when thousands suffer gyptian took to the streets of cairo with a very clear intention to end of the thirty year rule of their leader hosni mubarak the most fail is stood their ground in the thick of the deadly clashes until their primary demand was met the political turmoil cost egypt hundreds of lives and an economic turndown however didn't give vent to mubarak's reforms rhetoric the crowd made it clear it could no longer accept the status quo and it took them eighteen days of protests to get this message across finally mubarak stepped down never the less overt song leader left the country in the hands of the military so many people think nothing has changed in egypt one year since the revolution but the whole society is different the state however and its policies haven't changed the country now is no longer governed by power those who held power in the past are now trapped in defensive oppression imprisonment murder. all of this is evidence of the

confusion fear and horror they are feeling the critics agree it's very unlikely that and it's serious reforms which take place while the council is there even after the parliamentary elections the muslim brotherhood's freedom and justice party the two of them may try to say it's is predicted to have a hard time addressing social and economic problems under scaf none the less the country's domestic and foreign policy will change going to be a much more religious conservative place and much more hostile to the west well some experts convinced shari'a law will be forced in egypt others believe in the rise of moderate islamic parties whatever all of the parties that have long been marginalized will now have to be dealt with so far egyptians have demonstrated exceptional determination to build in egypt and elbowing their way towards them are just society but once you're on the revolution isn't saying it's may take another

hero for uprising to really own the change and whatever it does will be closely watched and exemplified in the region even though the consequences yet unknown illness of the trauma cross-talk r.t. . ok bradley fine go to you first i mean one year on what has changed in egypt because you could make the claim that it's the mubarak regime without mubarak that's really the the biggest difference between now and a year ago would you agree with that. well it remains to be seen i think they had a raucous start to their parliament. you know it was reminiscent really of the birth of america took us to leaven years to get our act together after our revolution so it's going to have to take some time to shake out the muslim brotherhood is in charge we still have presidential elections to be had and the military needs to step down and the west should really come to the aid of

the egyptians now when they need it the most especially on the economic front and give them the kind of a that will help their people get on their feet that's what they need now and let's give it some time to shake out but a lot of changes have already taken place a lot more have to do and i'm cautiously optimistic that the egyptian people will find their way ok david if i can go to you i mean in light of what just bradley had to say it seems to me and i'm going to be a senator that's my job here is that the u.s. the west and they feel very comfortable working with the egyptian military they have been partners for decades right now and they're still having the same kind of relationship minus mubarak so the status quo is is quite convenient for the west right now and the military doesn't really want to go i mean when they're putting up roadblocks at one after another we'll see you have we have a presidential election and people say that they the candidate will be chosen by the military they'll get their man in will be business as usual what do you think about that. you know i think there's the there's something to that but i also think

we need to take the long view here and think about what egypt looked like a year ago today before the revolution you had a regime in power for thirty years that employed something along the lines of two million internal security members and that was swept away by a by a popular uprising and i do think that there are been enormous political changes in egypt i think i don't think it's fair to say that the status quo reigns because a year ago you wouldn't have had free elections you wouldn't you would never have had a parliament led by the muslim brotherhood the freedom and justice party being seated absolutely and. and going to the parliament and having this rockets debate on the first day and it was a ruckus but i mean democracy is a ruckus so if you look at any particular day on the house of commons in the u.k. you see a kind of similar ferment so i don't think that we should be that we should be frightened by what's happening in our lives and i don't think we should be

frightened i think and no intent it's not being frightened i mean is it going to have an effect ok because if i go back to bradley i mean if we have this very strong president and again this is we'll see what's written in the constitution the writing and the constitution before the presidential election if it's going to be a very strong presidency then it's still going to be the same more or less what we have right now and i'd like to point out what another huge change since a year ago is the economic situation is very poor so again i mean the military just is not going to want to leave we all know that they have a huge vested interest in the economy are they going to divest themselves from the economy that seems very unlikely. well it's a good idea but now there's going to be also have to say i don't want to live well it's up to the newly elected president who had bradley to get their economic house in order and we can help in that regard they need about three billion dollars of capital immediately but we should do it like a millennium fun and not just give it out right we need to watch it we need to

treat it as trust money to make sure that it's being spent properly and gets to the people it's intended use we've we've been down this road before with pumping up governments that we thought would be friendly giving the money outright and the money was used against us so i think we'd have to join partners with the second with the european union with our friends in the middle east and we have to use our best efforts now to help the people of egypt and let the government make the changes they need to make and also put pressure on the military to stand down and hopefully the presidential elections will be one that will be free and fair but they were off to a good start i think i don't think we should be too pessimistic with a raucous parliament starve i think that that in a way in a way was a good thing i mean you don't expect things after thirty years of dictatorship to be. lockstep you need you need that give and take of government we see it in our government all over the world and in free societies it's a good thing ok if i go back to david what about the muslim brotherhood is that you

know there are a very powerful force now at least politically in egypt and and if there's a free and fair election in the military doesn't get in the way too much we may have a candidate from the same organization and now if we look very carefully at what they have to say they're not particularly friendly towards the west or not particularly friendly to the united states because they back to dictatorship for thirty years i mean what kind of relationship would a muslim brotherhood egypt and the west have particularly the united states well i mean it was first i don't know i don't think it's quite fair to say but the brotherhood back to the dictatorship for thirty years i mean no no i said no it's a western t.v. and i don't know that it's a lot of but you know to. isn't i know the united states supported the dictatorship not the muslim brotherhood they were actually sure by the way and i'm sure that the us administration is not i'm sure the us administration is not as not happy by the share of the seats one by the brotherhood party and by the newer party which is the vehicle by salafist. but i think that we've known i mean if we had

a clear look at what was going to happen from the first day of the arab spring we knew that the brotherhood was going to be the group that inherited power and post mubarak egypt and they haven't given any indication so far the they're going to pursue. for a tarion party is in fact they're playing this sort of more moderate for oil to the to the nor party and i think it would really benefit the united states to work closely with with the freedom and justice party and its leadership to try to hammer out some kind of a loose consensus about foreign policy goals and things like that it will be a more contentious relationship there's no question because there's nothing easier then than working with an authoritarian regime that you support to the tune of i mean windows and i don't think there's any and that's changed but there's no indication that they're going to be authoritarian why is there assumption that they're going to be authoritarian i mean they will played a very positive role during the revolution they've played a very moderate role since then but everyone every gets the jitters in the west you know when they hear this organization could be calling the shots real soon and

we're looking at foreign policy as you pointed out and of course israel is brought up. sure well i mean we have a we have a thirty year discourse that was actually you know propagated by the mubarak regime that it was effectively you know it's us or it's the crazies leninists you know and so that's been the discourse in the u.s. and because the brotherhood is a bit less accommodating on foreign policy issues like israel there is there's a great fear i think in policy circles in the west the brotherhood is going to sweep into power overturn the peace treaty and pursue a much more aggressive foreign policy but i do think that as long as the military is kind of lurking in the background which which they've given every indication that they're going to continue to do that they want to maintain a set of privileges extra-constitutional privileges that they're not going to give up at least not this cycle i do think those fears are a bit overblown. in terms of what might actually happen once the brotherhood takes

power assuming that they even win the presidency right which is not which is not a foregone conclusion but only what do you think about that you are more afraid of the egyptian military or the muslim brotherhood. i'm wary of both the military does have a very good track record go ahead but the military does have a really good track record with the people as you pointed out the massive security apparatus in the last thirty years the intelligence services the police the military what the real wild card here is how when the gyptian parliament the new president the military be dealing with israel it's not so much how they're going to be dealing with the united states are they're trading griezmann agreements on the peace agreements going to be honored that's that's really a more concern to me because i believe the main job here we're going to want to start with you go to a short break and work and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on egypt state org.

and. you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else you hear or see some other part of it and realized everything you thought you knew you don't know i'm tom parker parker the big picture. with. this month's supply particles that make up the fabric of the universe find what you're looking for in the deep siberian forests prevent a fire with the help of lasers in fibers plug your tablet of a new gaming religion and let the teacher begin all of that here in dover severe

sputniks knowledge you update here on. the future covered. and you can see. the.

welcome back to cross talk i'm peter lavelle to mind you were talking about the revolution in egypt one year on slim. and you can see. in its case very interesting john i know in reading some of the media coverage of the revolution when you're on the up and not really american but more like british and european is it to instead of this kind of dichotomy be have the muslim brotherhood in the military it looks more and more like they were in cahoots with each other ok and particularly when writing this constitution now do you think that the the the democratic element of this revolution is being swept away by these two major forces because they're going to make a deal and it's not necessarily a deal it's going to be very public because the military doesn't want to be very open about it because we all know about their privileges so if i go to you on that

david i mean so maybe it's just the cut you know it's not the extremes it's two different groups together that are very different they're going to make a deal with each other and it doesn't necessarily mean it has to be democratic. well i think that i think that there are actually great tensions between the brotherhood and the military on a number of issues including how much power the parliament will actually have so that i think to say that they're in cahoots with another might be a little bit premature because i think that there are going to be very significant issues you know after the parliament is seated and starts to try to pass legislation. the may drive a wedge between the military and the brotherhood the second thing is i think if you take the long view on this a lot of revolutions a lot of democratic transitions take several cycles to kind of shake out the authoritarian elements so i don't think that we should be surprised or even that alarmed if the military does remain retain some of its privileges because what we've seen again and again over the past year is that social forces will take to the streets to press the military on some of these issues if you if you think back

to when the military said it was going to turn over power to a president until two thousand and thirteen people took to the streets and then very suddenly the military regime said ok ok we'll have elections in june of two thousand and thirteen so i think even if there is this sort of tacit alliance between the brotherhood and the regime which i'm not sure we can really say i also think there's still a lot of space in egyptian society for people to go back to tahir and some of the other squares across egypt and press the regime and if necessary press the brother or the press the brotherhood on some of these issues in zero eight and bradley if i can be kind of change gears here i mean i was reading some interesting analysis about the revolution when you're on and one writer put it this way is that you know the people that started this revolution they have themselves to blame because all they had one demand is getting getting rid of mubarak and that was more or less that and once you got that you didn't have any leaders you didn't really have an agenda and this is one of the reasons why the revolution has drifted because you

have other forces that have come into play waiting out departure and then they can fill the gap because as we know the muslim brotherhood was supportive of the protesters but they weren't really and. all of them they made sure that there were no religious banners on the square and things like that they played a very low profile. role in all of this and now we see things have changed very differently the liberal parties did very badly in the election so it's still very much a wild card where this can go and with maybe more than anything else we'll see a form of islamic democracy and not a liberal democracy well look you can fool some of the people some of the time if if there is a deal being made by the military and accommodation it's got to be one that the people except the people have tremendous distrust of the military and if the military doesn't stand down and not to let the political parties and the and the power of the political parties and power rise to the occasion and the people feel

that they're being governed by a survey and authority i think they're going to be more protests so i think the muslim brotherhood are fooling themselves if they can make an accommodation with the military that the people will reject they have a golden opportunity now they had free and fair elections to get where they are today if they have free and fair elections for president they're well on their way to having a stable secure and friendly government not just to the west but to to all freedom loving countries and so the ball is in their hands but the military cannot be the person behind the curtain the people of egypt won't stand for it. david you know in looking at it and one public opinion poll result after another one of the most unpopular countries in egypt today is the united states because of its role in dealing with the dictator ship dictatorship for thirty years that's not changing either that hasn't changed since the the revolution a year ago if the muslim brotherhood and other islamic that were elected if they

follow the people's will it will be a very chilly relationship with the united states and as we brought up earlier possibly revoking the peace treaty with israel. sure well i mean you know some of the most iconic images from from the revolution are protesters picking up tear gas canisters and seeing you know the made in america and that sort of emblematic of the kind of military support that the u.s. gave to egypt over the years i think if you step back from public opinion and you look at what happened after the revolution started you could make an argument that american leverage played a role in getting mubarak to step aside but i don't think we should expect that to be the sort of like dominant paradigm in egypt where the we do have a very we are held in very low esteem our foreign policy not americans themselves the foreign policy is held in very low esteem and i don't think that really going to change until something changes on the israeli palestinian front. and that's not

something that the u.s. can control in egypt it's not something that the brotherhood can really do anything about that's a larger geo strategic issue that's really dragging down american popularity throughout the region because we are i think rightly seen as backing the israelis even though i mean there's a much chillier relationship between the obama administration and israel right now still the sort of basic contours of that relationship are still there it's very obvious to egyptians in the big thing is that egyptians no longer want to be complicit in forcing this bargain you know they don't want to be complicit in shutting off the gaza strip and blockading it they want to see their leadership take a bit more of an independent stance towards the united states and towards the israelis . and i think if that happens you might see some i mean i resent the offer to you know i'll stay here dissipated just a bit go ahead bradley jump in. ok number one is the egyptians have to realize they have enough problems of their own they shouldn't be straying into

bilateral relations and causing fights and disruptions beyond their own borders they have an internal struggle now and they should they should work within before looking with out number two is how are they going to react with iran and their threats to close the straits of hormuz are they going to inject themselves in matters that are really extraneous to their own position and number three if the united states wants to ingratiate themselves with the egyptian people what they've got to do is we've got to offer humanitarian aid we've got to offer loans and services to the egyptian people and not so much you know up the government but i very much you think on their side you know they and we wish nothing but the best for them but well i don't i think most egyptians don't believe that ok after thirty years it's hard for them to believe that the last twelve months hasn't changed and i think that's why we've got a lot of work to do now

a lot of them believe what are these rule intentions if you just leave egypt alone completely and let them decide for themselves let them decide their own foreign policy if they want to tear up the peace treaty with israel i should be very i mean you're saying there is an object ourselves it should be there it is politics but there's a lot of humanitarian relief that we can help on and that's the kind of work we should be doing ok well i mean if i could stay with you bradley i mean the eight i think you are i think nobody has the right right now it's david jumping ahead so i didn't know the reality is right now it's not it's not going to be strictly humanitarian aid because there's a real there's a real concern about what's going to happen with the peace treaty and things like that and i think if the brotherhood were to take power and win the presidency of this would be a real test of the degree to which the military is still exerting its control through some kind of invisible hand in the background and i think any extent to which the us the scene is cooperating with the military behind the scenes. to prevent elected leadership from making foreign policy changes is definitely not

going to do anything for our popularity i think no matter how much humanitarian aid we send the reality is that these larger issues related to israel palestine are always going to trump whatever we do on the ground because those will be more micro-level initiatives and they won't get the same kind of press attention so i agree that we should be doing that but on the other hand i think that we do have to allow the new elected leadership to kind of steer its foreign policy maybe not into a into a direction where we're going to have a confrontation over israel but in a way to allow that government to flex its independence to show the egyptian people that they are in fact in charge of their own affairs and that they're not like the u.s. as a lackey and so some way shape or form i think that's really important just for the just for the optics just for the theatricals to allow the egyptians the space to control their for their foreign policy because this is not just about the u.s. this goes back to british control this goes back to two hundred years of feeling like the egyptian people don't have control of their own foreign policy radley

thank you go to you what do you think about that because if we go back to the peace agreement with that with israel it seems to be either logic it's the other way around because of hard times because of the economy it be very easy for any government to say you know look over there you know let's help the palestinians and that would you know focus people's attention and in and release of frustration and again helping the palestinians in gaza is a very very popular issue among the average egyptian that's how it could turn out. well look if they decide to look beyond their own borders and not solve their own problems we're going to have a lot of problems because we're going to stand united states four square with israel that's the way it's going to be and if we have to deliver any message to the military or the new political leadership is that message is that if egypt has a choice to make are they going to start to solve their old problems are they going to get involved in other people's problems or have their own get nor have their own

foreign policy clear three values to indians to have their rooms and where israel says that they're going to have a real problem with us well maybe the average egyptian wouldn't have a problem of having that kind of problem ok david i'm going to give you the last word although you know the way things were they've done it before i mean i think that with a rock and a hard place here go ahead. the rock and a hard place here right is that the u.s. i think does have an interest in not allowing egyptians to exert some control over their own foreign policy but if if if they go too far in the eyes of the united states administration in the eyes of the west you might see some of this the funding that's desperately needed in egypt that might dry up you know so the elected leadership of egypt is going to have this a real difficult choice to make about how far to push this independence and foreign policy i do think that you're going to see a change in tone i think that elected leadership is going to push back against american foreign policy and israeli foreign policy and he's going to say you have run out of time you'll see many thanks to my guest today in washington and in

chicago and thanks to our viewers for watching us here are to see you next time and remember. we have seen the damage it has done to our environment mark chemicals what the poor props we do not want any more and no deal molds. our core systems just so that was abysmal experience and i'm just just appalled that that's allowed to go on in america. we are getting this unfortunately

because we don't know what's in it there's no labeling there for it being used like a board to experiment to be used as guinea. pigs oh now we have more questions than we have had three words. like. the observed nature and discover it's. the communicate with the wild and learn. to test yourself and become free. and. see what nature can give you an aunty. an emission

free accreditation free transport charges free. range months free risk free studio time free. download free broadcast quality video for your media projects a free media oh don to our teeth dot com. using a comment line of a broadcast in the heart of moscow haplessly hour and here are your headlines one year down the line egypt the celebrating the beginning of the revolution that at that altitude president mubarak tens of thousands of people are now on top or a square broad breast ration over the slow pace of change is cast a cloud over the party atmosphere. and the state of the union president obama pledges to fix the economy and create millions of new jobs and

a speech widely seen as the start of his reelection campaign critics of his address say his agenda leaves the white house open to accusations of double standards and his upbeat tone doesn't reflect reality. and julian a song known for spilling the world secrets online is going on air exclusively exclusive interview program is set to premiere here on our t.v. . next we bring you the story of one farmer who stood up against a massive multinational corporation to defend his rights and property stay with r.t. for that. in japan i met with a lot of scientists consumers and processors and importers and this document here is to convince version of the all the scientific studies the japanese have done.