welcome back you're watching our tyramine of the top stories today there's a moratorium on cow missing and debate in russia's presidential election a day before voters decide whose to leave the country that falls weeks of campaigning marred by vibrant rallies and protests to. the syrian army reportedly captures dozens of foreign mercenaries some of them from france during fighting in a rebellious city of homs meanwhile rebels are accused by an eyewitness of killing people and committing atrocities on cyprus you forces. some of them

a very very clear message to prove even a week from this forgiveness and towards what makes them. and powerful israeli lobby seeks president obama's blunt answer on whether the u.s. would support a military strike on iran washington isn't the size of it and warnings the move could be at disaster for most of the top stories out next maximizer as they say her look at what's in common between big corporations and whistleblowers. ties are welcome to the kaiser report remember a couple of weeks ago we were talking about the richest towns in america being within an hour's drive of washington d.c. and then most of those towns personalized and essentially spying on americans there is more space max yes this is the data industrial complex otherwise known as

dick and these dicks are in the news this week we have the hackers on one side and the hackers on the other side really strat four is a joke and so is wiki leaks for taking it seriously so we know we have this big data dump from wiki leaks which was data from strat for five million e-mails hacked by anonymous well the atlantic says the corporate research firm has branded itself as a cia like global intelligence firm but only julian a song and some over paying clients are fooled a friend who works in intelligence once joked that stratfor is just the economist a week later and several hundred times more expensive as of two thousand and one a strat for subscription could cost up to forty thousand dollars per year dick's data industrial complex. yes they charge a lot for the rehashing the economist magazine and who are the primary buyer of

this rehashed information of course wall street you know wall street spends billions of dollars a year buying research which is another huge loss. struck anyone can push single up and say they do research and somebody in wall street will buy it if they think that they're getting some. that's why i think this headline is wrong max stratfor is a joke and wiki leaks is a joke for taking it seriously yes strive for is the bimbo of the dick community. but the fact that our publicly subsidized them backed banks like goldman sachs and j.p. morgan take these guys seriously you know obviously the cia you can see in the e-mails treat these guys as a joke that you know these guys who think they're like super high tech spies for googling perhaps are drinking a martini shaken not stirred while googling and that's what they think is like our spy is remember the in the case of wall street who buys the research these are the

views of the wall street banks to get bailed out by the taxpayer exactly so the taxpayer get bailed out of goldman sachs or without without the largest of of warren buffet of the taxpayer and insider crony information voter sites have been bankrupt already but because of all the money that's thrown at them they can use those money their money to buy worthless research but the fact that it doesn't mean anything as worthless as a motorist their money that they're spending their spending our money as you see in this next of a massive insider secret dealings scheme with strat four in g. sachs maybe so the e-mails show that in two thousand and nine then goldman sachs managing director shame moran's and stratford c.e.o. george friedman hatched an idea to utilize the intelligence it was pulling in from its insider network to start up a captive strategic investment fun what strat capital do is use our stratford's intelligence and analysis to trade in a range of geo political instruments particularly government bonds currencies and

the like they said geo political instruments countries are treated like options like derivatives and they use bogus information from clause was a wanna be to put on algorithmic trades and high frequency trades and it doesn't go right to outcomes one they get the sucker type or bell now being they just pull of the country they just destroy the country so to go into iraq and goldman sachs a lot ahead an agenda. side million think they care because it's all priced into the stock price and the other reason why i give for why we should take this bimbo company stratfor seriously is look what happened with m.f. global was john corps lines intelligence that it was a sure bet to bet on portuguese and greek and european debt was that from this boom go company. well yes this is they go to these retreats where as the head of these banks they take off all their clothes to go into

a sweat laws they smoke cigars and they blow smoke up each other strange thing and they pretend to be masters of the universe and exchange inside information the start of the iraq war based on inside information that you can do a leveraged buyout of iraq you probably got that from strathmore and some don't turn around goldman sachs proprietary task and it was the result a million dead innocent people because of these freakin sadist and insider traders on wall street so the fact that goldman sachs is using stratfor we know stratfor source of information is google so we know therefore they j.p. morgan if j.p. morgan were real competitor to goldman sachs could just create an algorithm to trade against the publicly available information on google to trade against goldman sachs exactly and this is where algorithmic trading and i frequently trading is them how big is deutsche borse wants to curtail algorithmic trading high frequency trading what they call capacity restraint trading where you've got these computers

that are programmed not to make a market because lloyd blankfein argues but to break the market so they program the computer to attack the market like a stick attacking opinion and they just attack it with hundreds of millions of trades per second to try to shake the candy out free money that they did not work for whatsoever is beyond even rent seeking it's just it's worse than computerized extortion well max another hacker is in the news we had anonymous hacking strat for here we have. james murdoch quits as executive chairman of news international so just like shaft for the bimbos that were hacked by anonymous here james murdoch has been hacking e-mails and order to get the stories of bimbos around the world and now finally all of this information has come doubt that in fact the trail leads right up to james murdoch he did in fact know about the hacking the eight thousand people on jerry no cares no plug and he was apparently handing over transcripts

every single day of all these phones he was hacking they were gerry mulcair worked for a company called southern investigators kind of like a strat four and it was an x. policeman who is allegedly also an axe murderer and james murdoch is sitting there because he knows that he has data to sell he's basically pushing advertising what's incredible is that of julian a son ran a hedge fund and he used all this data to trade with insider information and algorithmic trading he'd be a billionaire today and people would accuse him of training on inside information but he would buy his way out of any legal problems and he would claim like lloyd blankfein of goldman sachs that he's making a market he's adding liquidity and they would say oh you just do so if you're a hedge fund genius we won a stupid. thing because you are god but of course because he shifted from initial

public like to berkshire of the press he's vilified because he's telling the truth and sharing information with the public these are the enemy for the worse murdoch who truly is an enemy walks around with his big full sea breasts flashing them to his son sunday audience hoping he can score with some transvestite somewhere in some dark alley that if you look like this right here if you're anonymous if you choose to remain anonymous. most likely you're the most valuable of the advertised to audience advertisers want that eighteen to thirty four year old male market that's the price primo thing that's why murdoch is a failed enterprise ok he failed at my space where people willingly give you information and data about themselves and yet he failed at that company so he can't compete in the market where people the participants willingly give them the data so

he has a strong arm or leg break and send the axe murderers to go hack the bones of little murdered children he can't make money even move it's given to him these are the the my space circles it should be made for hundreds of millions then of course as we know from the facebook i.p.o. people giving information is worth one hundred billion dollars or more my space was before facebook people were giving him information he thought was a way to promote his stupid movies at fox he didn't know what exactly what business he was even in the justin timberlake you know a pop singer what i spaced out of bankruptcy for like five bucks in the garden it's already out you know it's already bigger than than than the wall street journal in terms of a business but the point is max. your data as facebook is proving as google is proving its worth something your information is works worth something and here's rupert murdoch his little son james murdoch and their acts murdering hackers that

were stealing your information they didn't want to pay you a fair market price for your information portal dr evil he is not even about getting a fair market price he would people were giving him the information he could lose with it so we're going bankrupt like it is now but he's like who i want to prove. well let's look at how the comparison here is rupert murdoch he's clearly breaking the law that there's no we can't find any information the f.b.i. hasn't arrested him there's clear. your evidence that right now today james murdoch right now today should be in the custody of the f.b.i. who is in charge of arresting people for foreign corrupt practices act the man has obviously brought foreign officials police officers and politicians in the u.k. but he's not arrested was interested because he's connected he's an oligarch listen to how somebody who is not one of these oligarchs is treated suspect and celebrity hacker case sorry for all of this christopher chaney thirty five

a nobody from jacksonville florida is accused of hacking into the accounts of more than fifty celebrities including movie stars scarlett johansson a meal or coonass and singer christina aguilera a grand jury indicted cheney and nine counts of computer hacking for again eight counts of aggravated identity theft and nine counts of illegal wire tapping if convicted of all twenty six counts cheney would face a maximum of one hundred twenty one years in federal prison here's rupert murdoch who has been hacking celebrity accounts for over a decade quite clearly and what does he face nothing absolutely nothing is rewarded is lionized he's considered a pillar of society exactly so and it's all because as long as he's part of the data industrial complex he's a dick he's one of these data industrial complex com and he's allowed to get away

with it because as long as you're selling this data to the advertisers and you you know are part of this game now finally speaking of advertising max i have this graffiti here from the invader famous prison configuring is a closer look at the oh yeah no it's really no. and i have a headline again from another. anonymous stranger i don't know what it is what i'm like in a bank see an advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours people are taking that out of you every day they bought into your life take a cheap shot at you and then disappear they leer at you from the tall buildings that make you feel small they make flippant comments from bosses that imply you're not sexy enough and that all of the fun is happening somewhere else they are on t.v. making your girlfriend feel inadequate they have access to them with sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it they are the

advertisers and they are laughing at you banksy he understood this is ahead of the curve yet or stands the value of being anonymous and telling the truth but that's why i think that anonymous is under attack because they are anonymous they are remove themselves from the advertising grid they are not advertised to though they are the prime audience for advertisers they young male i love it i stated over thank so much for being on the kaiser report thank you all right to what i say right there much more coming your way.

i'm not going to new york city and speak with andy beck obama former executive doubt gelatos and the u.s. chamber of commerce. only as part of the yes man of course you can find his work at the yes man and his latest film the yes man fix the world is available on d.v.d. and the pickle bomb welcome to the kaiser report i think all right any book about for those who don't know for the international audience who are the yes man and what do they do in a word what the yes men try to do is make hoaxes make funny stories to give journalists an excuse to cover important issues that aren't getting covered enough

. so we come up with whatever scheme we can that we think is funny that we think other people think is funny and we do it with the audience being journalists who will then take the information and make a story of it getting more coverage for the issue in two thousand and four when we posed as dow chemical thanks to b.b.c. error we gave a lot of journalists an excuse to talk about the twentieth anniversary of the bhopal contester fee the biggest industrial disaster in history that has never been cleaned up dow chemical never took responsibility for the spill even though it bought the company responsible for the spill and the victims in india meanwhile have gotten practically nothing in compensation for a lot of the thousands of people died and they've gotten practically nothing and the state has never been cleaned up right so the bhopal disaster a famous incident you were on the b.b.c.

they mistakenly went to the web site and just brought enormous attention to this catastrophe in a way that cut through the media chatter it's everyone widely seen sees this as really a remarkable example of i guess what some would call culture jamming as well as you need from journalism but now the yes may have come up recently because according to the latest wiki leaks dump the yes men were monitored by strat for ok. company that you could save in impersonating a global intelligence company they seem to be like a shadow cia so tell us about the fines why you were mentioned in strat for stratfor seems to be a really creepy. there's a lot of really shallow we stuff that came out in the wiki leaks dump you know e-mails with the c o n structuring operatives to control their subjects

sexually psychologically and financially in order to extract information i don't know if that's what turn lists usually do they claim to be a journalist and a media company but they have these incredibly shadowy practices there's also what seems to be a really flagrant nasty example of insider insider trading where stratfor creates a thing called straps kept in collaboration with goldman sachs to capitalize on information that they obtain presumably through psychological sexual and financial control of their subjects. but with us it wasn't nearly so glamorous they were just monitoring public reports that we were putting you know the journalists were writing you know some some students were writing at colleges where we would appear and speak twitter feeds they they just monitored very carefully everything we were doing for years but yeah it didn't surprise us we don't have much of

a security culture we don't really care who reads our stuff we would prefer people not to read our private email although that seems to be a given that they're doing that as well but certainly reading public reports about us and trying to figure out exactly what we're up to is just the height of flattery really and we're very. well any big obama on the same day as these wiki leaks revelations we learn from the leveson inquiry in the u.k. that rupert murdoch's news corporation adding gauged in systemic widescale. bribery of corrupt police officers corrupt government officials in the u.k. so here you have rupert murdoch doing all the bad things that everyone is up in arms about in terms of what is being revealed through with the leaks but somehow through were rupert murdoch's organization there's not that level of outrage your thoughts on the role of the media in maintaining this this dual standard system where murdoch is good given so far

a slap on the wrist for doing things for doing is spying illegal spying corruption where is wiki leaks which is doing actually a public good service is seen as somehow in bed with the terrorists well it's certain certain very big forces are attacking wiki leaks it would seem. the u.s. government for example there are you know people who really don't want we keep leaks doing what they're doing they're a major threat to something and that's why you see blockading in the payments they can't you can't pay you can't donate money to wiki leaks through pay pal mastercard anything like that. all of those companies have mysteriously decided that we can lease must absolutely not receive any money they were getting hundreds of thousands of dollars a day and donations that went down to zero immediately because of this very effective blockade so somebody is very afraid of them and that might have something

to do with you know why there's. not more outrage i don't want to get conspiratorial i don't think that's really the case but there is some something going on there but speaking of systemic fears and systemic. issues you know why is we keep like such a threat it might not be just their immediate targets with us in the e-mail trove that they uncovered it seemed that. the dow. people or at least the stratfor people who were doing work for dell were really obsessed with one question and it wasn't so much were we going to mount a protest against dow for the bhopal issue they didn't seem to be too worried about that at least there isn't that much discussion about exactly what are they going to do i don't know is something coming up it was more are they going to broaden the issue to an overall systemic critique of corporate power they didn't use those

words but you know a broader issue question extending from both paul to other both poles to a bigger question of corporate power a corporate problem the use that word there is lengthy email discussion about that and you have to wonder why why are they so interested not in their clients' bottom line per se but in the question of what kind of critique is this going to. turn into and it's not just us that they asked the question about they asked the question about amnesty for example on the twenty fifth anniversary why didn't they expanded into this big critique of corporate problems why didn't any of the big n.g.o.s they ask these questions again and again and i'm not sure exactly why or what that indicates but it would seem to indicate maybe that that's a threat to them but the idea that the way that the rules committee changed and

that could seriously impact the bottom line of a lot of their clients including would be if there were a real popular upswelling of anger against the corporate system such as we have it that could lead to rewriting of rules and financial impact probably this very tightly issue based focus on on bhopal and specifically doesn't have that kind of possibility to affect anyone's bottom line you know doubt. could technically. as we've said many times they could technically just pay some money and be done with the both polishing once and for all. it's not it wouldn't be that they get an impact on their bottom line but what it would do if they did that would be set a massive precedent that would mean that other companies couldn't do things like this and speaking about that and the big picture issues and how we really have to rewrite the rules of the game and not just go after individual companies anymore.

talking about rewriting the rules of the game i think is is frightening for a lot of people who would rather the rules stay just as they are there might be a way occupy wall street has been so effective and so frightening to so many people and refuse them refusing to adopt a simple list of demands and you know precise targets has been probably the wisest thing that any movement could do to say no there is a serious problem here we have to rewrite the rules that allow corporations to get away with murder quite a little literally and a lot of lesser crimes as well oh it's a racket so you've got whether it's down jones or rupert murdoch they're part of the syndicate they're part of a mafia they're part of a racket and better connected at the hip to goldman sachs and wall street because goldman sachs applies the money the financing to the racket so that's a systemic risk that anybody who is looking at any individual component of the racket is being dirty they look at the the racket of goldman murdoch citi group you

know the real mafia the real terrorists they see there anyone who's challenging that is a snitch and of course if you snitch on the mafia you know that's the worst thing that can happen because then you on around all the entire unholy racketeering and war profiteering and basically you know what they've been able to do is to operate as a as a force and to overthrow and destabilize entire countries like greece for example who's now having to suffer austerity to pay for the the crimes the racketeering the mercenaries the financial mercenaries so it's just you know it's not so much of mentions conspiracy angle as a released a murdoch i think really read them but the bigger question is why wouldn't why is murdoch rewarded for his criminal activity he's allowed to open the sun on sunday you know his press is a failure he just shows women's breasts that's the sum total of his journalistic

ethics but he's reward. for this where is wiki leaks and julian assange which is doing the genuine work of journalism the genuine work of the furthest state they're being penalized now you live in the united states you live in new york is it palpable this this this feeling of a democracy being shattered by corporate interests of course democracy hijacked by corporate interests or are shattered definitely the way you put it the mafia it's exactly right there are very powerful people who want the system to stay the same and will do anything they can to make it stay the same it works very well for them as figures over the last ten twenty years and shown this incredible boon for the one percent and higher than the one percent and stagnating or dropping levels for the rest of us. and you know that is

a very real conspiracy i mean there are these real conspiracies such as you've pointed out and that's why i it's a bit frustrating when when people try to go funding farfetched conspiracies and spend a lot of time inventing scenarios that can't be proved because there's this real conspiracy that is plain as day can absolutely absolutely be proved no one's denying it there's tons of evidence it's everywhere and that's what we've really got to be fighting we've got to change the the rules of the game that allow this conspiracy to exist and there is a lot of. anger and a lot of outrage at this and i think we're just going to see it increasing over the spring and about the bomber time thanks so much for being on the kaiser report thank you all right that's going to do it for this edition of the kaiser report with me max pfizer and stacy herbert and i thank my guest and evicted mom of the yes man if you are seventy now please do so at kaiser report r t t v dot are you

until next time actually i'm just saying.