three. three stooges free. and free book to mediocre for your media project and free video dot com. before the first ballots are cast in russia's presidential campaigning and political ads are already off the airwaves as voters shake off their apathy and prepare for what's expected to be the highest election turnout in decades. yet another suicide bombing strikes in syria the latest in a chain of attacks against government supporters as the syrian national council for . a few. close u.s. prisons called between those for and against a military strike on iran's nuclear facilities to face the mighty israeli lobby for

. big corporations and what they might have in common with. ties are welcome to the kaiser report remember a couple of weeks ago we were talking about the richest towns in america being within an hour's drive of washington d.c. and then most of those towns specialized and essentially spying on americans there's more. max yes this is the data industrial complex otherwise known as dick and these dicks are in the news this week we have the hackers on one side and the hackers on the other side really strapped for is a joke and so is wiki leaks for taking it seriously so we know we have this big data dump from wiki leaks which was data from stats for five million e-mails hacked

by anonymous well the atlantic says the corporate research firm has branded itself as a cia like global intelligence firm but only julian a song and some over paying clients are fooled a friend who works in intelligence once joked that stratfor is just the economist a week later and several hundred times more expensive as of two thousand and one a stratfor subscription can cost up to forty thousand dollars per year fix industrial complex. yes they charge a lot for the rehashing the economist magazine and who is the primary buyer of this rehashed information of course wall street you know one street spends billions of dollars a year buying research which is another huge wall street's strength anyone can pushing all up and say they do research and somebody in wall street will buy it if they think that they're getting some. that's why i think this headline is wrong max

stratfor is a joke and wiki leaks is a joke for taking it seriously yes strive for is the bimbo of the dick community. but the fact that our publicly subsidized them back banks like goldman sachs and j.p. morgan take these guys seriously you know obviously the cia you could see in the e-mails treat these guys as a joke that you know these guys who think they're like super high tech spies for googling perhaps are drinking a martini shaken not stirred while googling and that's what they think is like how a spy is what a member of the in the case of wall street who buys the research these are the days of the wall street banks to get bailed out by the taxpayer exactly so the taxpayer pay to get bailed out of goldman sachs or without without the largest of of warren buffett of the taxpayer an insider corney information gold the size of a bankrupt already but because of all the money that's thrown at them they can use those money the money to buy worthless research is the fact of it doesn't mean

anything as worthless as another start their money that they're spending their spending our money as you see in this next said i had massive insider secret dealings scheme with strat four in g. sachs maybe so the e-mails show that in two thousand and nine then goldman sachs managing director shame moran's and stratfor c.e.o. george friedman hatched an idea to utilize the intelligence it was pulling in from its insider network to start up a captive strategic investment fund what struck capital do is use our stratford's intelligence analysis to trade in a range of geo political instruments particularly government bonds currencies and the like they said geo political instruments countries are treated like options like derivatives and they use bogus information from quasi cia want to be put on algorithmic trades and high frequency trades and it doesn't go right to outcomes one they get the sucker touch her bell now be they just blown the country they just

destroyed the country they'll go into iraq and goldman sachs a lot ahead and a gentle. million dead you think they care because it's all priced into the stock price and the other reason why i give for why we should take this bimbo company stratfor seriously is look what happened with m.f. global was john corps lines intelligence had it was a sure bet to bet on portuguese and greek and european debt was that from this bimbo company. oh yes this is they go to these retreats where it's the head of these banks they take off all their clothes they go into a sweat laws they smoke cigars and they blow smoke up each other strange thing and they pretend to be masters of the universe and exchange inside information there are chalabi the start of the iraq war based on inside information that you could do a leveraged buyout of iraq you probably got that from strat four and some don't train ron goldman sachs proprietary task and it was a result a million dead innocent people because of these frickin sadist and insider traders

on wall street so the fact that goldman sachs is using staffer we know stratfor source of information is google so we know therefore that j.p. morgan if j.p. morgan were a real competitor to goldman sachs could just create an algorithm to trade against the publicly available information on google to trade against goldman sachs exactly and this is where algorithmic trading and i frequency trading is that how big is deutsche borse wants to her tail algorithmic trading high frequency trading what they call capacity restraint training where you've got these computers that are programmed not to make a market as lloyd blankfein argues but to break a market so they program the computer to attack the market like a stick attacking opinion or they just attack it with hundreds of millions of trades per second to try to shake the candy out free money that they did not work for whatsoever is still an even rent seeking it's just it's

a computerized extortion when max another hacker is in the news we had anonymous hacking strap for here we have. james murdoch quits as executive chairman of news international so just like stratfor of the bimbo's that were hacked by anonymous here james murdoch has been hacking emails and order to get the stories of bimbo's around the world and now finally all of this information has come doubt that in fact the trail leads right up to james murdoch he did in fact know about the hacking the eight thousand people on jerry no cares no plug and he was apparently handing over transcripts every single day of all these phones he was hacking they were jerry hare worked for a company called southern investigators kind of like a strat four and it was that x. policeman who is allegedly also an axe murderer and james murdoch is sitting there because he knows that he has data to sell he's basically pushing advertising what's

incredible is that of julius own ran a hedge fund and he used all this data to trade with insider information and algorithmic trading he'd be a billionaire today and people would accuse him of training on inside information but he would buy his way out of any legal problems and he would claim like lloyd blankfein of goldman sachs that he's making the market he's adding liquidity and they would say oh you just do so if you're a good slogan genius we won a stupid. thing because you are god but of course because issues information the public. share of the press these vilified because he's telling the truth and sharing information with the public these are the enemy for the worse murdoch who truly is an enemy walks around with his big breasts flacid on sunday audience hoping you can score with some transvestite somewhere in some dark alley

that could make you look like this right yet if you're anonymous if you choose to remain anonymous. most likely you're the most valuable of the advertised to audience advertisers want that eighteen to thirty four year old male market that's the price primo thing that's why murdoch is a failed enterprise ok he failed at my space where people willingly give you information and data about themselves and yet he failed at that company so he can't compete in the market where people the participants willingly give them the data so he has a strong arm or leg break and send axe murderers to go hack to the phones of little murdered children he can't make money even move it's given to him these are the the my space of causation he may for hundreds of millions then of course as we know from the facebook i.p.o. people giving him information is worth one hundred billion dollars or more my space

was before facebook people were giving him information he thought was a way to promote his stupid movies at fox he didn't know what exactly what business he was even in now justin timberlake you know a pop singer what i spaced out of bankruptcy for like five bucks in the garden it's already out you know it's already bigger than than than the wall street journal in terms of a business but the point is max. your data as facebook is proving as google is proving its worth something your information is works worth something and here's rupert murdoch his little son james murdoch and their acts murdering hackers that were stealing your information they didn't want to pay you a fair market price for your information dr evil he is not even about getting a fair market price he would people were doing in the information economy blues with it going bankrupt like it is now but he's like who i want to prove your love. well let's look at how the comparison here is rupert murdoch he's clearly breaking

the law but there's no we can't find any information the f.b.i. hasn't arrested him there's clear. your evidence that right now today james murdoch right now today should be in the custody of the f.b.i. who is in charge of arresting people for foreign corrupt practices act the man has obviously brought foreign officials police officers and color titian's in the u.k. but he's not arrested was interested because he's connected he's an oligarch listen to how somebody who is not one of these oligarchs is treated suspect and celebrity hacker case sorry for all of this christopher chaney thirty five a nobody from jacksonville florida is accused of hacking into the accounts of more than fifty celebrities including movie stars scarlett johansson a meal or coonass and singer christina aguilera a grand jury indicted chaney and nine counts of computer hacking for again eight counts of aggravated identity theft and nine counts of illegal wire tapping if

convicted of all twenty six counts cheney would face a maximum of one hundred twenty one years in federal prison here's rupert murdoch who has been hacking celebrity accounts for over a decade quite clearly and what does he face nothing absolutely nothing is rewarded is line he's considered a pillar of society exactly so and it's all because as long as he's part of the data industrial complex he's a dick he's one of these data industrial complex scum and he's allowed to get away with it because as long as you're selling this data to the advertisers and you you know are part of this game now finally speaking of advertising max i have this graffiti art here from the invader famous prison configuring is a closer look at her oh yeah well it's really much. and i have

a headline again from another. anonymous transit i don't know what it is but i like it banks see an advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours people are taking that out of you every day they butt into your life take a cheap shot at you and then disappear they leer at you from the tall buildings and make you feel small they make flippant comments from bosses that imply you're not sexy enough and that all of the fun is happening somewhere else they are on t.v. making your girlfriend feel inadequate they have access to them with sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it they are the advertisers and they are laughing at you banksy he understood this is on the set of the curve yet or stands the value of being anonymous and telling the truth but that's why i think the anonymous is under attack because they are anonymous they are remove themselves from the advertising grid they are not advertised to though

they are the prime audience for advertisers the young male and look at it. states never thank so much for being on the kaiser court thank you all right don't go away stay right there much more coming your way. we all make choices sometimes it's tough. but it can be an easy call. choice can be left to fate. or it can be. limiting. each of the cold.

chums and. it's always personal. except for one day when choice matters to everyone. time now to get a new york city and speak with andy barack obama's former executive doubt tell it all in the u.s. chamber of commerce. only as part of the yes man of course you can find his work at the yes man dot org and his latest film the yes man fix the world is available on d.v.d. and the pickle bomb welcome to the kaiser report thanks alright any bickel going for those who don't know for the international audience who are the yes man and what do they do in a word what the yes men try to do is make hoaxes make funny stories to give journalists an excuse to cover important issues that aren't getting covered enough . so we come up with whatever scheme we can that we think is funny that we think

other people think is funny and we do it with the audience being journalists who will then take the information and make a story if it's getting more coverage for the issue in two thousand and four when we posed as dow chemical thanks to b.b.c. error we gave a lot of journalists an excuse to talk about the twentieth anniversary of the bhopal contest or for you the biggest industrial disaster in history that has never been cleaned up dow chemical never took responsibility for the spill even though it bought the company responsible for the spill and the victims in india meanwhile has gotten practically nothing in compensation for a lot of thousands of people and they've gotten practically nothing and the site has never been cleaned up right so they're both all disasters payment says events you're on the b.b.c. they mistakenly went to the website and just brought enormous attention to this

catastrophe in a way that cut through the media chatter it's everyone widely seen sees this as a really remarkable example of i guess what some would call culture jamming as well as unique form journalism but now the yes men have come up recently because according to the latest wiki leaks dump the yes men were monitored by strat for a to. helping me that you could say impersonating a global intelligence company they seem to be like a shadow cia so tell us about the fines a la you were mentioned in strat for stratfor seems to be a really creepy entity there's a lot of really shadow we stuff that came out in the wiki leaks don't you know e-mails with the c o n struct and operatives to control their subjects sexually psychologically and financially in order to extract information i don't know if that's what your lists usually do they claim to be a journalist and

a media company but they have these incredibly shadowy practices there's also what seems to be a really flagrant nasty example of inside insider trading where strapped for creates a thing called straps kept in collaboration with goldman sachs to capitalize on information that they obtain presumably through psychological sexual and financial control of their subjects. but with us it wasn't nearly so glamorous they were just monitoring public reports that we were putting you know their the journalists were writing or the you know some some students were writing it at colleges where we would appear and speak twitter feeds they they just monitored very carefully everything we were doing for years but yet it didn't surprise us we don't have much of a security culture we don't really care who reads our stuff we would prefer people not to read our private email although that seems to be

a given that they're doing that as well but certainly reading public reports about us and trying to figure out exactly what we're up to is just the height of flattery really and we're we're very flattered well any big obama on the same day as these wiki leaks revelations we learn from the leveson inquiry in the u.k. that rupert murdoch's news corporation adding gauged in systemic widescale. bribery of corrupt police officers corrupt government officials in the u.k. so here you have rupert murdoch doing all the bad things that everyone is up in arms about in terms of what is being revealed through weekend leaks but somehow through word rupert murdoch's organization there's not that level of outrage your thoughts on the role of the media in maintaining this this dual standard system where murdoch is getting given so far a slap on the wrist for doing things for doing is spying illegal spying corruption

where is wiki leaks which is doing actually a public good service is seen as somehow in bed with the terrorists well it's certain certain very big forces are attacking wiki leaks it would seem. the u.s. government for example there are you know people who really don't want we keep leaks doing what they're doing they're a major threat to something and that's why you see the blockading any payments they can't you can't pay you can't donate money to wiki leaks through pay pal master card or anything like that. all of those companies have mysteriously decided that we can lease must absolutely not receive any money they were getting hundreds of thousands of dollars a day and donations that went down to zero immediately because of this very effective blockade so somebody is very afraid of them and that might have something to do with you know why there's. not more outrage i don't want to get

conspiratorial i don't think that's really the case but there is some something going on there but speaking of systemic fears and systemic. issues you know why is we keep like such a threat it might not be just their immediate targets with us in the e-mail trove that they uncovered it seemed there. the dow. people or at least the stratfor people who were doing work for dell were really obsessed with one question and it wasn't so much were we going to mount a protest against for the bhopal issue they didn't seem to be too worried about that at least there isn't that much discussion about exactly what are they going to do i don't know is something coming up it was more are they going to broaden the issue to an overall systemic critique of corporate power they didn't use those words but you know a broader issue question extending from bhopal to other bowl polls to

a bigger question of corporate power a corporate problem they use that word there is lengthy email discussion about that and you have to wonder why why are they so interested not in their clients' bottom line per se but in the question of what kind of critique is this going to. turn into and it's not just us that they asked the question about they asked the question about amnesty for example on the twenty fifth anniversary why didn't they extended into this big critique of corporate problems why didn't any of the big n.g.o.s they ask these questions again and again and i'm not sure exactly why or what that indicates but it would seem to indicate maybe that that's a threat to them but the idea that the way that the rules can be changed and that could seriously impact the bottom line of a lot of their clients including would be if there were

a real popular up swelling of anger against the corporate system such as we have it that could lead to rewriting of rules and financial impact probably this very tightly issue based focus on bhopal and dow specifically doesn't have that kind of possibility to affect anyone's bottom line you no doubt. could technically. as we've said many times they could technically just pay some money and be done with the bhopal issue once and for all. it's not it wouldn't be that they get an impact on their bottom line but what it would do if they did that would be set a massive precedent that would mean that other companies couldn't do things like this and speaking about that and the big picture issues and how we really have to rewrite the rules of the game and not just go after individual companies anymore. talking about rewriting the rules of the game i think is is frightening for

a lot of people who would rather the rules stay just as they are they may be why occupy wall street has been so effective and so frightening to so many people and refuse them refusing to adopt a simple list of demands and you know the precise targets has been probably the wisest thing that any movement could do to sink no there's a serious problem here we have to rewrite the rules that allow corporations to get away with murder quite a little literally and a lot of lesser crimes as well oh it's a racket so you've got whether it's down jones or rupert murdoch they're part of a syndicate they're part of a mafia they're part of a racket that is connected at the hip to goldman sachs and wall street because goldman sachs applies the money the financing to the racket so that's a systemic risk that anybody who is looking at any individual component of the racket is being dirty they look at the the racket of goldman murdoch citi group you know the real mafia the real terrorists they see there anyone who's challenging

that is a snitch and of course if you snitch on the mafia you know that's the worst thing that can happen because then you on ravel the entire unholy racketeering and war profiteering and basically you know what they've been able to do is to operate as a as a force and to overthrow and destabilize entire countries like greece for example who's now having to suffer austerity to pay for the the crimes the racketeering and the mercenaries the financial mercenaries so it's just you know it's not so much akin mentions conspiracy angle at which as relates to murdoch i think really read them the bigger question is why wouldn't a wise murdoch rewarded for his criminal activity he's allowed to open the sun on sunday and you know his press is a failure he just shows women's breasts that's the sum total of his journalistic ethics but he's reward. it for this where is wiki leaks and julian assange was is doing the genuine work of journalism the genuine work of the fourth estate they're

being penalized now you live in the united states you live in new york is it palpable this this this feeling of a democracy being shattered by corporate interests of course don't democracy hijacked by corporate interests or are shattered definitely the way you put it the mafia it's exactly right there are very powerful people who want the system to stay the same and will do anything they can to make it stay the same it works very well for them as figures over the last ten twenty years have shown this incredible boon for the one percent and higher than the one percent and stagnating or dropping levels for the rest of us. and you know that is a very real conspiracy i mean there are these real conspiracies such as you've pointed out and that's why it's

a bit frustrating when when people try to go finding far fetched conspiracies and spend a lot of time inventing scenarios that can't be proved because there's this real conspiracy that is plain as day can absolutely absolutely be proved no one's denying it there's tons of evidence it's everywhere and that's what we've really got to be fighting we've got to change the the rules of the game that allow this conspiracy to exist and there is a lot of. anger and a lot of outrage at this and i think we're just going to see it increasing over the spring ended by the bomber time thanks so much for being on the kaiser report thank you all right that's going to do it for this mission of the kaiser report with me maximizer and stacy herbert and i thank my guests and if we could bomb all of the yes men if you are seventy now please do surprise report at our t.v. that are you until next time x. guys are saying i go.

from.